home.social

#datasheets — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #datasheets, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @jakmende ich finde den klugen Ansatz von @SarahOberbichler gut, dass sehr viel Arbeit seitens der Forschung und Finanzierung seitens der Förderinstitutionen für qualitätsgesicherte KI-Daten aufgewendet werden muss. Dazu an die Dokumententation mittels #datasheets und #dmp zu denken, ist in dem Kontext wichtig. #Dhd2026 #KI Panel

  2. @jakmende ich finde den klugen Ansatz von @SarahOberbichler gut, dass sehr viel Arbeit seitens der Forschung und Finanzierung seitens der Förderinstitutionen für qualitätsgesicherte KI-Daten aufgewendet werden muss. Dazu an die Dokumententation mittels #datasheets und #dmp zu denken, ist in dem Kontext wichtig. #Dhd2026 #KI Panel

  3. @jakmende ich finde den klugen Ansatz von @SarahOberbichler gut, dass sehr viel Arbeit seitens der Forschung und Finanzierung seitens der Förderinstitutionen für qualitätsgesicherte KI-Daten aufgewendet werden muss. Dazu an die Dokumententation mittels #datasheets und #dmp zu denken, ist in dem Kontext wichtig. #Dhd2026 #KI Panel

  4. @jakmende ich finde den klugen Ansatz von @SarahOberbichler gut, dass sehr viel Arbeit seitens der Forschung und Finanzierung seitens der Förderinstitutionen für qualitätsgesicherte KI-Daten aufgewendet werden muss. Dazu an die Dokumententation mittels #datasheets und #dmp zu denken, ist in dem Kontext wichtig. #Dhd2026 #KI Panel

  5. @jakmende ich finde den klugen Ansatz von @SarahOberbichler gut, dass sehr viel Arbeit seitens der Forschung und Finanzierung seitens der Förderinstitutionen für qualitätsgesicherte KI-Daten aufgewendet werden muss. Dazu an die Dokumententation mittels #datasheets und #dmp zu denken, ist in dem Kontext wichtig. #Dhd2026 #KI Panel

  6. In the introduction, we propose interviews as a method for documenting data provenance and making contextual information of cultural heritage data available.

    Through interviewing data editors, archivists, and project managers, we aim to shed a light on their work, which often remains invisible but nevertheless has a major impact on film historical information infrastructures and thus on knowledge production.

    doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17234097

    #DataProvenance #DataSheets #Interviews #DigitalMethods #DH

  7. Pour vous #retrouver #techniquement plus #facilement, #comprendre mieux les #activités proposées par #electro-robot et vous faire #familiariser avec la #lecture des #documents #techniques, electro-robot vous propose une #nouvelle #page dédiée qui vous #regroupe l’ensemble des #fiches techniques, qu’on appelle #datasheets dans une #seule page : electro-robot.com/datasheets

  8. This post is probably only for the intersection of the #Venn diagram with circles labelled "#guitar player" and "#electronics hobbyist". I'm not on fora like #diystompboxes and such, so here it will have to be.

    Like many others, I've built delay / echo #pedals / circuits using the ubiquitous #PT2399 digital delay IC. They're dirt cheap and simple to use. But the lowest delay period you can use them for is too long for some things, like #flanger / #phaser effects, or even some types of #chorus effects.

    But I haven't seen much discussion of alternatives. I've been playing around with one I've built using the #M65831 digital #delay chip. It's not quite as cheap as the PT2399, but you don't have to look very hard to be able to get them for a couple of bucks (Canadian). But it seems to be so much better in this application.

    First, it's designed and documented so that you can use a crystal to set its clock OR drive it directly with a CMOS-type square wave. No fiddling with drain currents and on-reset latchup problems.

    Secondly, it sounds (to my ear) far better than the PT2399. The #datasheets I have for the PT2399 don't state a sampling rate; the M65831 uses 500 ksamples/s for lower delay times.

    Thirdly, the range of delay available is larger. The shortest documented for PT2399 is ~31ms. For the M65831, it's 12.3ms using the default clock of 2 MHz. But the one sample I've tried is happy to run at 6 #MHz, for a delay of ~4ms. That's short enough for #flanging!

    1/2

  9. This post is probably only for the intersection of the #Venn diagram with circles labelled "#guitar player" and "#electronics hobbyist". I'm not on fora like #diystompboxes and such, so here it will have to be.

    Like many others, I've built delay / echo #pedals / circuits using the ubiquitous #PT2399 digital delay IC. They're dirt cheap and simple to use. But the lowest delay period you can use them for is too long for some things, like #flanger / #phaser effects, or even some types of #chorus effects.

    But I haven't seen much discussion of alternatives. I've been playing around with one I've built using the #M65831 digital #delay chip. It's not quite as cheap as the PT2399, but you don't have to look very hard to be able to get them for a couple of bucks (Canadian). But it seems to be so much better in this application.

    First, it's designed and documented so that you can use a crystal to set its clock OR drive it directly with a CMOS-type square wave. No fiddling with drain currents and on-reset latchup problems.

    Secondly, it sounds (to my ear) far better than the PT2399. The #datasheets I have for the PT2399 don't state a sampling rate; the M65831 uses 500 ksamples/s for lower delay times.

    Thirdly, the range of delay available is larger. The shortest documented for PT2399 is ~31ms. For the M65831, it's 12.3ms using the default clock of 2 MHz. But the one sample I've tried is happy to run at 6 #MHz, for a delay of ~4ms. That's short enough for #flanging!

    1/2

  10. This post is probably only for the intersection of the #Venn diagram with circles labelled "#guitar player" and "#electronics hobbyist". I'm not on fora like #diystompboxes and such, so here it will have to be.

    Like many others, I've built delay / echo #pedals / circuits using the ubiquitous #PT2399 digital delay IC. They're dirt cheap and simple to use. But the lowest delay period you can use them for is too long for some things, like #flanger / #phaser effects, or even some types of #chorus effects.

    But I haven't seen much discussion of alternatives. I've been playing around with one I've built using the #M65831 digital #delay chip. It's not quite as cheap as the PT2399, but you don't have to look very hard to be able to get them for a couple of bucks (Canadian). But it seems to be so much better in this application.

    First, it's designed and documented so that you can use a crystal to set its clock OR drive it directly with a CMOS-type square wave. No fiddling with drain currents and on-reset latchup problems.

    Secondly, it sounds (to my ear) far better than the PT2399. The #datasheets I have for the PT2399 don't state a sampling rate; the M65831 uses 500 ksamples/s for lower delay times.

    Thirdly, the range of delay available is larger. The shortest documented for PT2399 is ~31ms. For the M65831, it's 12.3ms using the default clock of 2 MHz. But the one sample I've tried is happy to run at 6 #MHz, for a delay of ~4ms. That's short enough for #flanging!

    1/2

  11. This post is probably only for the intersection of the #Venn diagram with circles labelled "#guitar player" and "#electronics hobbyist". I'm not on fora like #diystompboxes and such, so here it will have to be.

    Like many others, I've built delay / echo #pedals / circuits using the ubiquitous #PT2399 digital delay IC. They're dirt cheap and simple to use. But the lowest delay period you can use them for is too long for some things, like #flanger / #phaser effects, or even some types of #chorus effects.

    But I haven't seen much discussion of alternatives. I've been playing around with one I've built using the #M65831 digital #delay chip. It's not quite as cheap as the PT2399, but you don't have to look very hard to be able to get them for a couple of bucks (Canadian). But it seems to be so much better in this application.

    First, it's designed and documented so that you can use a crystal to set its clock OR drive it directly with a CMOS-type square wave. No fiddling with drain currents and on-reset latchup problems.

    Secondly, it sounds (to my ear) far better than the PT2399. The #datasheets I have for the PT2399 don't state a sampling rate; the M65831 uses 500 ksamples/s for lower delay times.

    Thirdly, the range of delay available is larger. The shortest documented for PT2399 is ~31ms. For the M65831, it's 12.3ms using the default clock of 2 MHz. But the one sample I've tried is happy to run at 6 #MHz, for a delay of ~4ms. That's short enough for #flanging!

    1/2

  12. This post is probably only for the intersection of the #Venn diagram with circles labelled "#guitar player" and "#electronics hobbyist". I'm not on fora like #diystompboxes and such, so here it will have to be.

    Like many others, I've built delay / echo #pedals / circuits using the ubiquitous #PT2399 digital delay IC. They're dirt cheap and simple to use. But the lowest delay period you can use them for is too long for some things, like #flanger / #phaser effects, or even some types of #chorus effects.

    But I haven't seen much discussion of alternatives. I've been playing around with one I've built using the #M65831 digital #delay chip. It's not quite as cheap as the PT2399, but you don't have to look very hard to be able to get them for a couple of bucks (Canadian). But it seems to be so much better in this application.

    First, it's designed and documented so that you can use a crystal to set its clock OR drive it directly with a CMOS-type square wave. No fiddling with drain currents and on-reset latchup problems.

    Secondly, it sounds (to my ear) far better than the PT2399. The #datasheets I have for the PT2399 don't state a sampling rate; the M65831 uses 500 ksamples/s for lower delay times.

    Thirdly, the range of delay available is larger. The shortest documented for PT2399 is ~31ms. For the M65831, it's 12.3ms using the default clock of 2 MHz. But the one sample I've tried is happy to run at 6 #MHz, for a delay of ~4ms. That's short enough for #flanging!

    1/2

  13. Les opérateurs de RansomExx diffusent des données relatives à :

    • 🇹🇼 [5.15GiB] Walsin Technology Corporation, Ltd. (walsin.com)

    The world's leading manufacturer of passive components with one-stop-shop product portfolio and worldwide delivery platform. The company's product lineup includes multiple-layer ceramic chip (MLCC) capacitor/array, chip-resistor/array & networks, RF . Walsin Technology Corporation, membre de l'alliance Passive Systems Alliance Taiwan, est une société taïwanaise dont l'activité principale est la fabrication, le traitement et la vente de condensateurs multicouches à puces céramiques (MLCC), de résistances à puces, de dispositifs à haute fréquence (HF) et de dispositifs à radiofréquence.

    #TAIWAN #RANSOMEXX #RANSOMWARE #SIGNAL #DATABREACH #COMMUNITY #TELECOMMUNICATIONS #COMPONENTS #NETWORKS #CERTIFICATIONS #SHOPS #FILTERS #MARKETS #RADARS #THREATS #COMMUNICATION #MOBILE #ENDPOINTS #RESISTORS #FIRMS #TECHNOLOGIES #INVERTERS #PLATFORM #WAREHOUSE #ROADMAP #POWER #MEDICAL #MICROELECTRONICS #TELECOM #NUMÉRIQUE #DIGITAL #CORPORATE #SCHEMATICS #DIODES #DELIVERY #MEASURING #RETAILS #COMPUTING #BROADBAND #INVESTORS #DEVELOPMENT #SHAREHOLDERS #CHIPS #FUTURE #PROFESSIONALS #SEMI-CONDUCTEURS #CUSTOMERS #MAINTENANCE #TELEPHONY #BRANDS #ENERGY #CONSUMERS #SEMICONDUCTORS #CAPACITORS #PRODUCTS #RADIO #ELECTRONICS #FREQUENCY #INSTRUMENT #ANTENNAS #COMPLIANCE #COMPANIES #DISTRIBUTION #ECUADOR ##SUPPLYCHAIN #CHAIN #DEVICES #DIAGRAMS #INTERNATIONAL #FREQUENCY #INDUSTRY #BUSINESS #INNOVATION #GOVERNANCE #AUTOMOTIVE #SALES #WIRELESS #SERVICES #SUPPLY #DATASHEETS #MANAGEMENT #CIRCUITS #CAREERS #INNOVATIVE #MANUFACTURING #SPACE #SUPPORT #BLUEPRINTS #PROFESSIONAL #INTERNET #TECHNOLOGY #ROHS #CYBER #SOLUTIONS #CORPORATE #RELATIONS #INDUCTORS #ELECTRONIC