home.social

#user — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #user, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The agonizing slow death of the power user

    This is a fascinating article to read. The facts are nailed to the wall in clear and easy to comprehend jargon, even for the non-grey beards

    Some quotes

    Ask a twenty-two-year-old to connect to a remote server via SSH. Ask them to explain what DNS is at a conceptual level. Ask them to tell you the difference between their router’s public IP and the local IP of their laptop. Ask them to open a terminal and list the contents of a directory. These are not advanced topics. Twenty years ago these were things you learned in the first week of any serious engagement with computers. Today they’re exotic knowledge that even a lot of working software developers don’t have, because you can go a long way in modern development without ever leaving the managed abstractions your platform provides.

    And that’s the real damage. It’s not just end users who don’t know this stuff. It’s developers. People who write software for a living who’ve never had to think about what happens between their API call and the response. Who’ve never had to debug something at the network layer. Who’ve never had to read a full stack trace and understand every frame of it. Because the frameworks handle all of that, and the frameworks are good enough, and figuring out how things actually work is optional.

    iOS set the template. Apple shipped a device in 2007 that was, by any reasonable technical measure, a computer. It had a CPU, RAM, persistent storage, a network stack, and a real operating system descended from BSD Unix. By every cultural and legal measure, however, Apple treated it as something else entirely: an appliance that you licensed rather than owned, that ran software only Apple approved, that couldn’t be meaningfully modified, and that communicated only through channels Apple controlled. No filesystem access. No inter-app communication beyond what Apple chose to expose. No background processes without explicit, limited, grudging permission. No ability to install software from any source other than the App Store — which Apple created, controls, taxes at thirty percent, and can pull your app from at any time for any reason with no meaningful appeals process.

    Some facts

    Power User

    A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices who uses advanced features of computer hardware,[1][2][3] operating systems,[4] programs, or websites[5] which are not used by the average user. A power user might not have extensive technical knowledge of the systems they use[6] but is rather characterized by competence or desire to make the most intensive use of computer programs or systems.

    Term use

    The term came into use in the 1980s, as advocates for computing developed special skills for working with or customizing existing hardware and software. Power users knew the best ways to perform common tasks and find advanced information before the arrival of the commercial Internet. On PC platforms, power users read magazines like Byte or PC Magazine, and knew enough about operating systems to create and edit batch files, write short programs in BASIC, and adjust system settings. They tended to customize or "supercharge" existing systems, rather than create new software.[7]

    Notes

    This is systematically done by the factories of technology. I am baffled that a 41 year old litterate person, with secondary school and partial tertiary school, cant tell the difference between an email account, a FB account, a local machine account, a table, notebook and Android phone, from the basic technological perspective. This happened a couple of hours ago, which makes this article very relevant to me.

    This person was born two generations ago!

    WTF happened to reading manuals!?

    I read all manuals I get with hardware I buy, go online to fetch and read, PRINT IF I HAVE TO!

    Power Users are a sub-species of homosapiens which is in the greybeard stage.

    Eventually we will drop our current corpus and move on to other energy levels of existence

    Power users will become extinct in the next generation or two

    A bleak future for those left

    Z

    sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Us

    fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the

    #Power #User #Death #Vigil #Eulogy #Abstraction #API #IDE #programming #DNS #networking #File #System #FileSystem #sadness #bleak #future #lisp

  2. The agonizing slow death of the power user

    This is a fascinating article to read. The facts are nailed to the wall in clear and easy to comprehend jargon, even for the non-grey beards

    Some quotes

    Ask a twenty-two-year-old to connect to a remote server via SSH. Ask them to explain what DNS is at a conceptual level. Ask them to tell you the difference between their router’s public IP and the local IP of their laptop. Ask them to open a terminal and list the contents of a directory. These are not advanced topics. Twenty years ago these were things you learned in the first week of any serious engagement with computers. Today they’re exotic knowledge that even a lot of working software developers don’t have, because you can go a long way in modern development without ever leaving the managed abstractions your platform provides.

    And that’s the real damage. It’s not just end users who don’t know this stuff. It’s developers. People who write software for a living who’ve never had to think about what happens between their API call and the response. Who’ve never had to debug something at the network layer. Who’ve never had to read a full stack trace and understand every frame of it. Because the frameworks handle all of that, and the frameworks are good enough, and figuring out how things actually work is optional.

    iOS set the template. Apple shipped a device in 2007 that was, by any reasonable technical measure, a computer. It had a CPU, RAM, persistent storage, a network stack, and a real operating system descended from BSD Unix. By every cultural and legal measure, however, Apple treated it as something else entirely: an appliance that you licensed rather than owned, that ran software only Apple approved, that couldn’t be meaningfully modified, and that communicated only through channels Apple controlled. No filesystem access. No inter-app communication beyond what Apple chose to expose. No background processes without explicit, limited, grudging permission. No ability to install software from any source other than the App Store — which Apple created, controls, taxes at thirty percent, and can pull your app from at any time for any reason with no meaningful appeals process.

    Some facts

    Power User

    A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices who uses advanced features of computer hardware,[1][2][3] operating systems,[4] programs, or websites[5] which are not used by the average user. A power user might not have extensive technical knowledge of the systems they use[6] but is rather characterized by competence or desire to make the most intensive use of computer programs or systems.

    Term use

    The term came into use in the 1980s, as advocates for computing developed special skills for working with or customizing existing hardware and software. Power users knew the best ways to perform common tasks and find advanced information before the arrival of the commercial Internet. On PC platforms, power users read magazines like Byte or PC Magazine, and knew enough about operating systems to create and edit batch files, write short programs in BASIC, and adjust system settings. They tended to customize or "supercharge" existing systems, rather than create new software.[7]

    Notes

    This is systematically done by the factories of technology. I am baffled that a 41 year old litterate person, with secondary school and partial tertiary school, cant tell the difference between an email account, a FB account, a local machine account, a table, notebook and Android phone, from the basic technological perspective. This happened a couple of hours ago, which makes this article very relevant to me.

    This person was born two generations ago!

    WTF happened to reading manuals!?

    I read all manuals I get with hardware I buy, go online to fetch and read, PRINT IF I HAVE TO!

    Power Users are a sub-species of homosapiens which is in the greybeard stage.

    Eventually we will drop our current corpus and move on to other energy levels of existence

    Power users will become extinct in the next generation or two

    A bleak future for those left

    Z

    sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Us

    fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the

    #Power #User #Death #Vigil #Eulogy #Abstraction #API #IDE #programming #DNS #networking #File #System #FileSystem #sadness #bleak #future #lisp

  3. The agonizing slow death of the power user

    This is a fascinating article to read. The facts are nailed to the wall in clear and easy to comprehend jargon, even for the non-grey beards

    Some quotes

    Ask a twenty-two-year-old to connect to a remote server via SSH. Ask them to explain what DNS is at a conceptual level. Ask them to tell you the difference between their router’s public IP and the local IP of their laptop. Ask them to open a terminal and list the contents of a directory. These are not advanced topics. Twenty years ago these were things you learned in the first week of any serious engagement with computers. Today they’re exotic knowledge that even a lot of working software developers don’t have, because you can go a long way in modern development without ever leaving the managed abstractions your platform provides.

    And that’s the real damage. It’s not just end users who don’t know this stuff. It’s developers. People who write software for a living who’ve never had to think about what happens between their API call and the response. Who’ve never had to debug something at the network layer. Who’ve never had to read a full stack trace and understand every frame of it. Because the frameworks handle all of that, and the frameworks are good enough, and figuring out how things actually work is optional.

    iOS set the template. Apple shipped a device in 2007 that was, by any reasonable technical measure, a computer. It had a CPU, RAM, persistent storage, a network stack, and a real operating system descended from BSD Unix. By every cultural and legal measure, however, Apple treated it as something else entirely: an appliance that you licensed rather than owned, that ran software only Apple approved, that couldn’t be meaningfully modified, and that communicated only through channels Apple controlled. No filesystem access. No inter-app communication beyond what Apple chose to expose. No background processes without explicit, limited, grudging permission. No ability to install software from any source other than the App Store — which Apple created, controls, taxes at thirty percent, and can pull your app from at any time for any reason with no meaningful appeals process.

    Some facts

    Power User

    A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices who uses advanced features of computer hardware,[1][2][3] operating systems,[4] programs, or websites[5] which are not used by the average user. A power user might not have extensive technical knowledge of the systems they use[6] but is rather characterized by competence or desire to make the most intensive use of computer programs or systems.

    Term use

    The term came into use in the 1980s, as advocates for computing developed special skills for working with or customizing existing hardware and software. Power users knew the best ways to perform common tasks and find advanced information before the arrival of the commercial Internet. On PC platforms, power users read magazines like Byte or PC Magazine, and knew enough about operating systems to create and edit batch files, write short programs in BASIC, and adjust system settings. They tended to customize or "supercharge" existing systems, rather than create new software.[7]

    Notes

    This is systematically done by the factories of technology. I am baffled that a 41 year old litterate person, with secondary school and partial tertiary school, cant tell the difference between an email account, a FB account, a local machine account, a table, notebook and Android phone, from the basic technological perspective. This happened a couple of hours ago, which makes this article very relevant to me.

    This person was born two generations ago!

    WTF happened to reading manuals!?

    I read all manuals I get with hardware I buy, go online to fetch and read, PRINT IF I HAVE TO!

    Power Users are a sub-species of homosapiens which is in the greybeard stage.

    Eventually we will drop our current corpus and move on to other energy levels of existence

    Power users will become extinct in the next generation or two

    A bleak future for those left

    Z

    sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Us

    fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the

    #Power #User #Death #Vigil #Eulogy #Abstraction #API #IDE #programming #DNS #networking #File #System #FileSystem #sadness #bleak #future #lisp

  4. The agonizing slow death of the power user

    This is a fascinating article to read. The facts are nailed to the wall in clear and easy to comprehend jargon, even for the non-grey beards

    Some quotes

    Ask a twenty-two-year-old to connect to a remote server via SSH. Ask them to explain what DNS is at a conceptual level. Ask them to tell you the difference between their router’s public IP and the local IP of their laptop. Ask them to open a terminal and list the contents of a directory. These are not advanced topics. Twenty years ago these were things you learned in the first week of any serious engagement with computers. Today they’re exotic knowledge that even a lot of working software developers don’t have, because you can go a long way in modern development without ever leaving the managed abstractions your platform provides.

    And that’s the real damage. It’s not just end users who don’t know this stuff. It’s developers. People who write software for a living who’ve never had to think about what happens between their API call and the response. Who’ve never had to debug something at the network layer. Who’ve never had to read a full stack trace and understand every frame of it. Because the frameworks handle all of that, and the frameworks are good enough, and figuring out how things actually work is optional.

    iOS set the template. Apple shipped a device in 2007 that was, by any reasonable technical measure, a computer. It had a CPU, RAM, persistent storage, a network stack, and a real operating system descended from BSD Unix. By every cultural and legal measure, however, Apple treated it as something else entirely: an appliance that you licensed rather than owned, that ran software only Apple approved, that couldn’t be meaningfully modified, and that communicated only through channels Apple controlled. No filesystem access. No inter-app communication beyond what Apple chose to expose. No background processes without explicit, limited, grudging permission. No ability to install software from any source other than the App Store — which Apple created, controls, taxes at thirty percent, and can pull your app from at any time for any reason with no meaningful appeals process.

    Some facts

    Power User

    A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices who uses advanced features of computer hardware,[1][2][3] operating systems,[4] programs, or websites[5] which are not used by the average user. A power user might not have extensive technical knowledge of the systems they use[6] but is rather characterized by competence or desire to make the most intensive use of computer programs or systems.

    Term use

    The term came into use in the 1980s, as advocates for computing developed special skills for working with or customizing existing hardware and software. Power users knew the best ways to perform common tasks and find advanced information before the arrival of the commercial Internet. On PC platforms, power users read magazines like Byte or PC Magazine, and knew enough about operating systems to create and edit batch files, write short programs in BASIC, and adjust system settings. They tended to customize or "supercharge" existing systems, rather than create new software.[7]

    Notes

    This is systematically done by the factories of technology. I am baffled that a 41 year old litterate person, with secondary school and partial tertiary school, cant tell the difference between an email account, a FB account, a local machine account, a table, notebook and Android phone, from the basic technological perspective. This happened a couple of hours ago, which makes this article very relevant to me.

    This person was born two generations ago!

    WTF happened to reading manuals!?

    I read all manuals I get with hardware I buy, go online to fetch and read, PRINT IF I HAVE TO!

    Power Users are a sub-species of homosapiens which is in the greybeard stage.

    Eventually we will drop our current corpus and move on to other energy levels of existence

    Power users will become extinct in the next generation or two

    A bleak future for those left

    Z

    sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Us

    fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the

    #Power #User #Death #Vigil #Eulogy #Abstraction #API #IDE #programming #DNS #networking #File #System #FileSystem #sadness #bleak #future #lisp

  5. The agonizing slow death of the power user

    This is a fascinating article to read. The facts are nailed to the wall in clear and easy to comprehend jargon, even for the non-grey beards

    Some quotes

    Ask a twenty-two-year-old to connect to a remote server via SSH. Ask them to explain what DNS is at a conceptual level. Ask them to tell you the difference between their router’s public IP and the local IP of their laptop. Ask them to open a terminal and list the contents of a directory. These are not advanced topics. Twenty years ago these were things you learned in the first week of any serious engagement with computers. Today they’re exotic knowledge that even a lot of working software developers don’t have, because you can go a long way in modern development without ever leaving the managed abstractions your platform provides.

    And that’s the real damage. It’s not just end users who don’t know this stuff. It’s developers. People who write software for a living who’ve never had to think about what happens between their API call and the response. Who’ve never had to debug something at the network layer. Who’ve never had to read a full stack trace and understand every frame of it. Because the frameworks handle all of that, and the frameworks are good enough, and figuring out how things actually work is optional.

    iOS set the template. Apple shipped a device in 2007 that was, by any reasonable technical measure, a computer. It had a CPU, RAM, persistent storage, a network stack, and a real operating system descended from BSD Unix. By every cultural and legal measure, however, Apple treated it as something else entirely: an appliance that you licensed rather than owned, that ran software only Apple approved, that couldn’t be meaningfully modified, and that communicated only through channels Apple controlled. No filesystem access. No inter-app communication beyond what Apple chose to expose. No background processes without explicit, limited, grudging permission. No ability to install software from any source other than the App Store — which Apple created, controls, taxes at thirty percent, and can pull your app from at any time for any reason with no meaningful appeals process.

    Some facts

    Power User

    A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices who uses advanced features of computer hardware,[1][2][3] operating systems,[4] programs, or websites[5] which are not used by the average user. A power user might not have extensive technical knowledge of the systems they use[6] but is rather characterized by competence or desire to make the most intensive use of computer programs or systems.

    Term use

    The term came into use in the 1980s, as advocates for computing developed special skills for working with or customizing existing hardware and software. Power users knew the best ways to perform common tasks and find advanced information before the arrival of the commercial Internet. On PC platforms, power users read magazines like Byte or PC Magazine, and knew enough about operating systems to create and edit batch files, write short programs in BASIC, and adjust system settings. They tended to customize or "supercharge" existing systems, rather than create new software.[7]

    Notes

    This is systematically done by the factories of technology. I am baffled that a 41 year old litterate person, with secondary school and partial tertiary school, cant tell the difference between an email account, a FB account, a local machine account, a table, notebook and Android phone, from the basic technological perspective. This happened a couple of hours ago, which makes this article very relevant to me.

    This person was born two generations ago!

    WTF happened to reading manuals!?

    I read all manuals I get with hardware I buy, go online to fetch and read, PRINT IF I HAVE TO!

    Power Users are a sub-species of homosapiens which is in the greybeard stage.

    Eventually we will drop our current corpus and move on to other energy levels of existence

    Power users will become extinct in the next generation or two

    A bleak future for those left

    Z

    sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Us

    fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the

    #Power #User #Death #Vigil #Eulogy #Abstraction #API #IDE #programming #DNS #networking #File #System #FileSystem #sadness #bleak #future #lisp

  6. Heritage Foundation Leak

    source: ddosecrets.org/article/heritag…

    Includes "full names, #email #addresses, #passwords, and #usernames" of people associating with the #Heritage #Foundation between 2007 and November 2022, as well as the organization's blogs and material related to The Daily Signal.

    #hack #hacker #leak #heritagefoundation #politics #security #cybersecurity #internet #ddos #bigdata #user #password #emails #fail #problem #news

  7. Heritage Foundation Leak

    source: ddosecrets.org/article/heritag…

    Includes "full names, #email #addresses, #passwords, and #usernames" of people associating with the #Heritage #Foundation between 2007 and November 2022, as well as the organization's blogs and material related to The Daily Signal.

    #hack #hacker #leak #heritagefoundation #politics #security #cybersecurity #internet #ddos #bigdata #user #password #emails #fail #problem #news

  8. Heritage Foundation Leak

    source: ddosecrets.org/article/heritag…

    Includes "full names, #email #addresses, #passwords, and #usernames" of people associating with the #Heritage #Foundation between 2007 and November 2022, as well as the organization's blogs and material related to The Daily Signal.

    #hack #hacker #leak #heritagefoundation #politics #security #cybersecurity #internet #ddos #bigdata #user #password #emails #fail #problem #news

  9. Das Fediverse im Stadt-Modell erläutert

    Im #Fediverse ist die Rede von Instanzen, die zusammen kommunizieren und gemeinsam das föderierte Universum bilden. Da kommen technische Begriffe ins Spiel wie Server, Software, Protokoll usw. usf. - und Produkte wie #Mastodon, #Friendica, #Pixelfed und viele mehr sowie Protokolle wie #ActivityPub... und viele Details mehr.

    Wie kann man sich das vorstellen, wenn wir mal davon ausgehen würden, daß Instanzen Städte auf einem Planeten sind?

    Nehmen wir also mal an, eine #Instanz bzw. ein #Server bzw. ein #Knotenpunkt im #Fediversum wäre eine Stadt auf einem Planeten. Inklusive Bevölkerung. Diese Stadt kann auf einem Eigenbau basieren oder sie nutzt einen Bauplan für eine spezielle Art von Stadt. Dieser Bauplan wäre dann eine Serversoftware wie Mastodon oder #Firefish oder eine andere.

    Leute können sich in einer bereits gebauten Stadt ansiedeln oder eine eigene Stadt aufbauen. Da viele Baupläne für speziell ausgerichtete Städte frei verfügbar existieren (Open Source!), kann diese neue Gemeinschaft auf Basis eines solchen Bauplans eine neue Stadt errichten. Oder etwas eigenes bauen, weil... und hier kommen wir zum nächsten Punkt.

    Die Städte auf diesem Planeten sind durch Wege verbunden. Diese Wege sind genormt, damit die Städte sich untereinander austauschen können und die jeweiligen Stadtverwaltungen wissen, wie sie mit Informationen und Botschaften, die über diese Wege übermittelt werden, umgehen und nicht wie ein Ochs' vorm Berg dastehen. Viele Wege nutzen die Norm "ActivityPub". Dies erlaubt dann auch komplett neue Typen von Städten, sofern diese über standardisierte Wege an vorhandene Städe angeschlossen werden.

    Soweit so klar?

    Instanzen entsprechen Städten, die #User der Instanzen der jeweiligen Stadtbevölkerung, die #Administration einer Instanz entspricht der Stadtverwaltung einer Stadt, unterschiedliche Arten von #Serversoftware bzw. Baupläne regeln die Art des Stadtaufbaus und Protokolle entsprechen genormten Wegen zwischen Städten.

    Was passiert nun, wenn ein Bewohner in Stadt A einer Bewohnerin in Stadt B folgen will? Im Hintergrund wird die Stadtverwaltung von Stadt A tätig und schickt über den Weg (zwischen den Städten) eine Botschaft zu Stadt B. Dort nimmt die Stadtverwaltung von Stadt B den Folgewunsch entgegen und bearbeitet ihn. Akzeptiert die Bewohnerin von Stadt B Folgeanfragen ohne manuelle Überprüfung ihrerseits, kann ihre Stadtverwaltung gleich im Hintergrund eine Bestätigungsbotschaft über den Weg zu Stadt A zurückschicken. Die Stadtverwaltungen der Städte A und B kennen nun die Folgebeziehung zwischen den beiden Bewohnenden und können gewissermaßen einen Vermerk im Stadtarchiv vornehmen. Wenn nun die Bewohnerin in Stadt B einen neuen Beitrag verfaßt, weiß ihre Stadtverwaltung, daß sie eine Botschaft mit diesem Beitrag über die Wegeverbindung zu Stadt A schicken muß, weil dort ein Bewohner Interesse angemeldet hat bzw. folgt. Die Stadtverwaltung von Stadt A weiß auch Bescheid und kann den Beitrag aus Stadt B für ihren Bewohner präsentieren.

    Immer noch klar?

    Macht dieses Städtegleichnis den Aufbau des föderierten Universums nun verständlicher, ändert es nichts oder wird es noch komplizierter? ;-)

    Achso, die Fediverse-Adresse entspricht gewissermaßen dem Namen und der Anschrift der jeweiligen Bewohnenden der Städte. Die Adresse beinhaltet den Namen und die Stadt. Innerhalb einer Stadt reicht der Name aus, aber bei Botschaften zwischen Städten muß Namen und Stadt genannt werden. Und ja, das ist einer Telefonnummer mit Vorwahl nicht unähnlich.

    Völlig verwirrt? Oder bestens ins Bild gesetzt?

    Viel Spaß im Fediverse!

  10. «Weil KI-Modelle absichtlich schlecht arbeiten — Forscher suchen Wege aus der Sandbagging-Falle:
    […] sogenanntes "Sandbagging", bei dem ein Modell seine wahren Fähigkeiten absichtlich zurückhält und scheinbar adäquate, aber unterdurchschnittliche Arbeit liefert.»

    Wann begreifen die online User*innen endlich, dass sie das Produkt sind und dies bei jeglichen Angebote die "nichts kosten"?

    🤨 the-decoder.de/weil-ki-modelle

    #ki #sandbagging #aislop #user #arbeit #produkte #unterdurchschnittlich #aitools

  11. «Weil KI-Modelle absichtlich schlecht arbeiten — Forscher suchen Wege aus der Sandbagging-Falle:
    […] sogenanntes "Sandbagging", bei dem ein Modell seine wahren Fähigkeiten absichtlich zurückhält und scheinbar adäquate, aber unterdurchschnittliche Arbeit liefert.»

    Wann begreifen die online User*innen endlich, dass sie das Produkt sind und dies bei jeglichen Angebote die "nichts kosten"?

    🤨 the-decoder.de/weil-ki-modelle

    #ki #sandbagging #aislop #user #arbeit #produkte #unterdurchschnittlich #aitools

  12. «Weil KI-Modelle absichtlich schlecht arbeiten — Forscher suchen Wege aus der Sandbagging-Falle:
    […] sogenanntes "Sandbagging", bei dem ein Modell seine wahren Fähigkeiten absichtlich zurückhält und scheinbar adäquate, aber unterdurchschnittliche Arbeit liefert.»

    Wann begreifen die online User*innen endlich, dass sie das Produkt sind und dies bei jeglichen Angebote die "nichts kosten"?

    🤨 the-decoder.de/weil-ki-modelle

    #ki #sandbagging #aislop #user #arbeit #produkte #unterdurchschnittlich #aitools

  13. «Weil KI-Modelle absichtlich schlecht arbeiten — Forscher suchen Wege aus der Sandbagging-Falle:
    […] sogenanntes "Sandbagging", bei dem ein Modell seine wahren Fähigkeiten absichtlich zurückhält und scheinbar adäquate, aber unterdurchschnittliche Arbeit liefert.»

    Wann begreifen die online User*innen endlich, dass sie das Produkt sind und dies bei jeglichen Angebote die "nichts kosten"?

    🤨 the-decoder.de/weil-ki-modelle

    #ki #sandbagging #aislop #user #arbeit #produkte #unterdurchschnittlich #aitools

  14. I'm seeing this #ad a lot on #Telegram right now, and I'm just like, #WTF?

    Unfortunately, it’s become the norm that online #advertising and #marketing are nothing but a complete rip-off. It seems like they’re just trying to fleece the most gullible users out of their #money. An #AI #bot that gives you true love and attention—exactly what our lonely #society needs.

    #technology #news #advertisement #economy #internet #online #user #customer #loneliness #men #care #love #attention #fail #humanity #future #friendship #friend #conversation #computer #software #business #businessmodel #mental #health #omg

  15. I'm seeing this #ad a lot on #Telegram right now, and I'm just like, #WTF?

    Unfortunately, it’s become the norm that online #advertising and #marketing are nothing but a complete rip-off. It seems like they’re just trying to fleece the most gullible users out of their #money. An #AI #bot that gives you true love and attention—exactly what our lonely #society needs.

    #technology #news #advertisement #economy #internet #online #user #customer #loneliness #men #care #love #attention #fail #humanity #future #friendship #friend #conversation #computer #software #business #businessmodel #mental #health #omg

  16. I'm seeing this #ad a lot on #Telegram right now, and I'm just like, #WTF?

    Unfortunately, it’s become the norm that online #advertising and #marketing are nothing but a complete rip-off. It seems like they’re just trying to fleece the most gullible users out of their #money. An #AI #bot that gives you true love and attention—exactly what our lonely #society needs.

    #technology #news #advertisement #economy #internet #online #user #customer #loneliness #men #care #love #attention #fail #humanity #future #friendship #friend #conversation #computer #software #business #businessmodel #mental #health #omg

  17. I'd like to see A|B #testing of an online call-to-action with/without the phrase "We value your privacy".

    If you're outside Europe and aren't sure what this means, it's this. Countries in the EU are required to get #user #consent before their websites can track personal and private online data.

    The General Data Protection Regulation or #GDPR has caused many websites to endlessly bug European visitors for consent, claiming, "Your #privacy is important." Are such phrases persuasive?

    #UR #ABTest

  18. I'd like to see A|B #testing of an online call-to-action with/without the phrase "We value your privacy".

    If you're outside Europe and aren't sure what this means, it's this. Countries in the EU are required to get #user #consent before their websites can track personal and private online data.

    The General Data Protection Regulation or #GDPR has caused many websites to endlessly bug European visitors for consent, claiming, "Your #privacy is important." Are such phrases persuasive?

    #UR #ABTest

  19. I'd like to see A|B #testing of an online call-to-action with/without the phrase "We value your privacy".

    If you're outside Europe and aren't sure what this means, it's this. Countries in the EU are required to get #user #consent before their websites can track personal and private online data.

    The General Data Protection Regulation or #GDPR has caused many websites to endlessly bug European visitors for consent, claiming, "Your #privacy is important." Are such phrases persuasive?

    #UR #ABTest

  20. I'd like to see A|B #testing of an online call-to-action with/without the phrase "We value your privacy".

    If you're outside Europe and aren't sure what this means, it's this. Countries in the EU are required to get #user #consent before their websites can track personal and private online data.

    The General Data Protection Regulation or #GDPR has caused many websites to endlessly bug European visitors for consent, claiming, "Your #privacy is important." Are such phrases persuasive?

    #UR #ABTest

  21. I'd like to see A|B #testing of an online call-to-action with/without the phrase "We value your privacy".

    If you're outside Europe and aren't sure what this means, it's this. Countries in the EU are required to get #user #consent before their websites can track personal and private online data.

    The General Data Protection Regulation or #GDPR has caused many websites to endlessly bug European visitors for consent, claiming, "Your #privacy is important." Are such phrases persuasive?

    #UR #ABTest