#personalitytraits — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #personalitytraits, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: May 12, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Are the benefits of psychedelics exaggerated? A new study highlights the problem of selection bias
A study comparing psychedelic enthusiasts and people from the general population (who also had psychedelic experiences) found that the enthusiasts tended to report much greater positive quality-of-life effects. The enthusiasts also showed higher openness, extraversion, and agreeableness. This indicates that recruitment strategies in psychedelic research that lean towards including enthusiasts may shape the outcomes obtained in those studies. The paper was published in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs.
Psychedelic drugs are substances that can strongly alter perception, mood, thinking, and the sense of self. They may change how people experience colors, sounds, time, memories, emotions, and the meaning of events. Classic psychedelics include LSD, psilocybin from “magic mushrooms,” DMT, and mescaline. These substances mainly act on serotonin receptors in the brain.
In research settings, psychedelics are being studied for possible therapeutic use in conditions such as depression, PTSD, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Their effects depend heavily on dose, personality, expectations, mental state, physical setting, and social support. Psychedelics can also carry risks, including panic, confusion, dangerous behavior during intoxication, worsening of some psychiatric conditions, and legal consequences where they are prohibited.
Study author Jonathan Bendz and his colleagues noted that many studies of psychedelic users report extraordinarily positive self-reported effects. However, they suggest that this might represent an exaggeration of the real effects caused by biased selection, or even self-selection, of study participants. The issue is that the effects of psychedelics can only be tested on individuals who agree to use them. These participants tend to be individuals who have already had especially positive experiences with psychedelic use.
To examine this hypothesis, these researchers conducted a study comparing whether the self-reported quality-of-life impact of psychedelic experiences differed between a convenience sample of psychedelic enthusiasts and a group of people from the general population recruited via Prolific. They also wanted to see whether the difference between the two groups remained after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation to use psychedelic drugs, and personality traits.
The enthusiast group consisted of 583 individuals recruited through an anonymous survey posted on the Facebook and Instagram pages of a Swedish nonprofit organization that disseminates information about psychedelic science (Nätverket för Psykedelisk Vetenskap). A snowball sampling approach was used to reach more participants. The general population group consisted of 599 individuals recruited via Prolific (an online survey platform). They were required to have prior psychedelic experience, but were not recruited from a specific psychedelic community.
Study participants completed assessments of the quality-of-life impact of their psychedelic experiences (e.g., “How has your most meaningful psychedelic experience affected the quality of your relationship with… family, friends, yourself, society, and nature?”). They also answered questions regarding their mindset and physical setting during the experience (“To what extent did you experience your mindset/environment to be optimal?”), their motivation (“What was your motivation for using a psychedelic substance?”), and their personality (using the IPIP-NEO-30 assessment).
Results showed that the psychedelic enthusiasts tended to report a much higher quality-of-life impact from their psychedelic experiences compared to the Prolific group. The enthusiast group also reported having a more optimal mindset and setting during their trips, and they were more likely to report taking the drugs for personal growth rather than for fun. Finally, the enthusiasts tended to be more open to new experiences, extraverted, and agreeable than the participants from the Prolific group.
Even after using a statistical model to account for these differences in personality, mindset, setting, and motivation, simply belonging to the enthusiast group remained the strongest predictor of reporting a high quality-of-life impact.
“As expected, participants recruited from an enthusiast-leaning channel reported considerably greater benefits [of psychedelic use] than those recruited from a general-population platform. Even after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation, and personality, sample membership remained the strongest predictor of quality-of-life impact,” the study authors concluded.
“The persistent effect of sample membership suggests that the two groups differ in additional ways not captured by our measures, for example in cultural expectations, social context, or demographic composition, shaping reported outcomes. These results underscore the need for caution when interpreting findings from psychedelic studies that rely on highly engaged user populations.”
The study sheds light on important methodological issues that studies of psychedelic effects face. However, the authors note some limitations. For example, the two groups had demographic differences; the general sample was overwhelmingly from the United States, while the enthusiast sample lacked country-of-residence data for most participants (though a portion resided in Sweden). This introduces the possibility of cross-cultural differences influencing the results.
Additionally, it should be noted that the Prolific sample likely included many psychedelic enthusiasts as well. Because of this, the difference between the two groups in this study likely underestimates the true difference between the general population and psychedelic enthusiasts.
The paper, “Selection Bias in Psychedelic Research: Comparing Self-Reported Quality-Of-Life Impact Between Enthusiasts and a General Population Sample,” was authored by Jonathan Bendz, Linus Schäfer, David Sjöström, Sverker Sikström, and Petri Kajonius.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Psychedelics #SelectionBias #QualityOfLife #PsychedelicResearch #StudyBias #OpenMindedness #PersonalityTraits #MentalHealthResearch #TherapeuticPsychedelics #ScientificCaution
-
DATE: May 12, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Are the benefits of psychedelics exaggerated? A new study highlights the problem of selection bias
A study comparing psychedelic enthusiasts and people from the general population (who also had psychedelic experiences) found that the enthusiasts tended to report much greater positive quality-of-life effects. The enthusiasts also showed higher openness, extraversion, and agreeableness. This indicates that recruitment strategies in psychedelic research that lean towards including enthusiasts may shape the outcomes obtained in those studies. The paper was published in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs.
Psychedelic drugs are substances that can strongly alter perception, mood, thinking, and the sense of self. They may change how people experience colors, sounds, time, memories, emotions, and the meaning of events. Classic psychedelics include LSD, psilocybin from “magic mushrooms,” DMT, and mescaline. These substances mainly act on serotonin receptors in the brain.
In research settings, psychedelics are being studied for possible therapeutic use in conditions such as depression, PTSD, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Their effects depend heavily on dose, personality, expectations, mental state, physical setting, and social support. Psychedelics can also carry risks, including panic, confusion, dangerous behavior during intoxication, worsening of some psychiatric conditions, and legal consequences where they are prohibited.
Study author Jonathan Bendz and his colleagues noted that many studies of psychedelic users report extraordinarily positive self-reported effects. However, they suggest that this might represent an exaggeration of the real effects caused by biased selection, or even self-selection, of study participants. The issue is that the effects of psychedelics can only be tested on individuals who agree to use them. These participants tend to be individuals who have already had especially positive experiences with psychedelic use.
To examine this hypothesis, these researchers conducted a study comparing whether the self-reported quality-of-life impact of psychedelic experiences differed between a convenience sample of psychedelic enthusiasts and a group of people from the general population recruited via Prolific. They also wanted to see whether the difference between the two groups remained after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation to use psychedelic drugs, and personality traits.
The enthusiast group consisted of 583 individuals recruited through an anonymous survey posted on the Facebook and Instagram pages of a Swedish nonprofit organization that disseminates information about psychedelic science (Nätverket för Psykedelisk Vetenskap). A snowball sampling approach was used to reach more participants. The general population group consisted of 599 individuals recruited via Prolific (an online survey platform). They were required to have prior psychedelic experience, but were not recruited from a specific psychedelic community.
Study participants completed assessments of the quality-of-life impact of their psychedelic experiences (e.g., “How has your most meaningful psychedelic experience affected the quality of your relationship with… family, friends, yourself, society, and nature?”). They also answered questions regarding their mindset and physical setting during the experience (“To what extent did you experience your mindset/environment to be optimal?”), their motivation (“What was your motivation for using a psychedelic substance?”), and their personality (using the IPIP-NEO-30 assessment).
Results showed that the psychedelic enthusiasts tended to report a much higher quality-of-life impact from their psychedelic experiences compared to the Prolific group. The enthusiast group also reported having a more optimal mindset and setting during their trips, and they were more likely to report taking the drugs for personal growth rather than for fun. Finally, the enthusiasts tended to be more open to new experiences, extraverted, and agreeable than the participants from the Prolific group.
Even after using a statistical model to account for these differences in personality, mindset, setting, and motivation, simply belonging to the enthusiast group remained the strongest predictor of reporting a high quality-of-life impact.
“As expected, participants recruited from an enthusiast-leaning channel reported considerably greater benefits [of psychedelic use] than those recruited from a general-population platform. Even after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation, and personality, sample membership remained the strongest predictor of quality-of-life impact,” the study authors concluded.
“The persistent effect of sample membership suggests that the two groups differ in additional ways not captured by our measures, for example in cultural expectations, social context, or demographic composition, shaping reported outcomes. These results underscore the need for caution when interpreting findings from psychedelic studies that rely on highly engaged user populations.”
The study sheds light on important methodological issues that studies of psychedelic effects face. However, the authors note some limitations. For example, the two groups had demographic differences; the general sample was overwhelmingly from the United States, while the enthusiast sample lacked country-of-residence data for most participants (though a portion resided in Sweden). This introduces the possibility of cross-cultural differences influencing the results.
Additionally, it should be noted that the Prolific sample likely included many psychedelic enthusiasts as well. Because of this, the difference between the two groups in this study likely underestimates the true difference between the general population and psychedelic enthusiasts.
The paper, “Selection Bias in Psychedelic Research: Comparing Self-Reported Quality-Of-Life Impact Between Enthusiasts and a General Population Sample,” was authored by Jonathan Bendz, Linus Schäfer, David Sjöström, Sverker Sikström, and Petri Kajonius.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Psychedelics #SelectionBias #QualityOfLife #PsychedelicResearch #StudyBias #OpenMindedness #PersonalityTraits #MentalHealthResearch #TherapeuticPsychedelics #ScientificCaution
-
DATE: May 12, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Are the benefits of psychedelics exaggerated? A new study highlights the problem of selection bias
A study comparing psychedelic enthusiasts and people from the general population (who also had psychedelic experiences) found that the enthusiasts tended to report much greater positive quality-of-life effects. The enthusiasts also showed higher openness, extraversion, and agreeableness. This indicates that recruitment strategies in psychedelic research that lean towards including enthusiasts may shape the outcomes obtained in those studies. The paper was published in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs.
Psychedelic drugs are substances that can strongly alter perception, mood, thinking, and the sense of self. They may change how people experience colors, sounds, time, memories, emotions, and the meaning of events. Classic psychedelics include LSD, psilocybin from “magic mushrooms,” DMT, and mescaline. These substances mainly act on serotonin receptors in the brain.
In research settings, psychedelics are being studied for possible therapeutic use in conditions such as depression, PTSD, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Their effects depend heavily on dose, personality, expectations, mental state, physical setting, and social support. Psychedelics can also carry risks, including panic, confusion, dangerous behavior during intoxication, worsening of some psychiatric conditions, and legal consequences where they are prohibited.
Study author Jonathan Bendz and his colleagues noted that many studies of psychedelic users report extraordinarily positive self-reported effects. However, they suggest that this might represent an exaggeration of the real effects caused by biased selection, or even self-selection, of study participants. The issue is that the effects of psychedelics can only be tested on individuals who agree to use them. These participants tend to be individuals who have already had especially positive experiences with psychedelic use.
To examine this hypothesis, these researchers conducted a study comparing whether the self-reported quality-of-life impact of psychedelic experiences differed between a convenience sample of psychedelic enthusiasts and a group of people from the general population recruited via Prolific. They also wanted to see whether the difference between the two groups remained after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation to use psychedelic drugs, and personality traits.
The enthusiast group consisted of 583 individuals recruited through an anonymous survey posted on the Facebook and Instagram pages of a Swedish nonprofit organization that disseminates information about psychedelic science (Nätverket för Psykedelisk Vetenskap). A snowball sampling approach was used to reach more participants. The general population group consisted of 599 individuals recruited via Prolific (an online survey platform). They were required to have prior psychedelic experience, but were not recruited from a specific psychedelic community.
Study participants completed assessments of the quality-of-life impact of their psychedelic experiences (e.g., “How has your most meaningful psychedelic experience affected the quality of your relationship with… family, friends, yourself, society, and nature?”). They also answered questions regarding their mindset and physical setting during the experience (“To what extent did you experience your mindset/environment to be optimal?”), their motivation (“What was your motivation for using a psychedelic substance?”), and their personality (using the IPIP-NEO-30 assessment).
Results showed that the psychedelic enthusiasts tended to report a much higher quality-of-life impact from their psychedelic experiences compared to the Prolific group. The enthusiast group also reported having a more optimal mindset and setting during their trips, and they were more likely to report taking the drugs for personal growth rather than for fun. Finally, the enthusiasts tended to be more open to new experiences, extraverted, and agreeable than the participants from the Prolific group.
Even after using a statistical model to account for these differences in personality, mindset, setting, and motivation, simply belonging to the enthusiast group remained the strongest predictor of reporting a high quality-of-life impact.
“As expected, participants recruited from an enthusiast-leaning channel reported considerably greater benefits [of psychedelic use] than those recruited from a general-population platform. Even after controlling for mindset, setting, motivation, and personality, sample membership remained the strongest predictor of quality-of-life impact,” the study authors concluded.
“The persistent effect of sample membership suggests that the two groups differ in additional ways not captured by our measures, for example in cultural expectations, social context, or demographic composition, shaping reported outcomes. These results underscore the need for caution when interpreting findings from psychedelic studies that rely on highly engaged user populations.”
The study sheds light on important methodological issues that studies of psychedelic effects face. However, the authors note some limitations. For example, the two groups had demographic differences; the general sample was overwhelmingly from the United States, while the enthusiast sample lacked country-of-residence data for most participants (though a portion resided in Sweden). This introduces the possibility of cross-cultural differences influencing the results.
Additionally, it should be noted that the Prolific sample likely included many psychedelic enthusiasts as well. Because of this, the difference between the two groups in this study likely underestimates the true difference between the general population and psychedelic enthusiasts.
The paper, “Selection Bias in Psychedelic Research: Comparing Self-Reported Quality-Of-Life Impact Between Enthusiasts and a General Population Sample,” was authored by Jonathan Bendz, Linus Schäfer, David Sjöström, Sverker Sikström, and Petri Kajonius.
-------------------------------------------------
DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Psychedelics #SelectionBias #QualityOfLife #PsychedelicResearch #StudyBias #OpenMindedness #PersonalityTraits #MentalHealthResearch #TherapeuticPsychedelics #ScientificCaution
-
PsyPost: New research links personality traits to confidence in recognizing artificial intelligence deception. “A study published in the journal F1000Research in 2023 suggests that specific personality traits, particularly honesty and agreeableness, can predict how confident young adults feel in their ability to spot deepfake videos.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/04/17/psypost-new-research-links-personality-traits-to-confidence-in-recognizing-artificial-intelligence-deception/ -
Word of the day: Irascible
Irascible is a word used to describe someone quick to anger or easily irritated. Whether in everyday interactions…
#NewsBeep #News #Economy #ADJECTIVE #anger #Business #characteranalysis #easilyirritated #emotion #irascible #Literature #personalitytraits #quicktoanger #temperament #UK #UnitedKingdom
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/439430/ -
Loyalty to Trump Characterized by Personality Traits, Analysis Suggests
Studies look at personality traits of Donald Trump supporters. Some people show strong loyalty, like in a personality cult. This affects politics.
#TrumpSupporters, #PersonalityTraits, #PoliticalLoyalty, #USPolitics, #Analysis
https://newsletter.tf/trump-loyalty-personality-traits-study/
-
New research suggests that Donald Trump's strongest supporters have certain personality traits. These traits might explain why their loyalty is so strong and lasts a long time. This loyalty is seen as different from normal political support.
#TrumpSupporters, #PersonalityTraits, #PoliticalLoyalty, #USPolitics, #Analysis
https://newsletter.tf/trump-loyalty-personality-traits-study/
-
What Really Makes Someone Cool According to Science and Why Most People Aren’t
https://wp.me/p84YjG-abC
#whatmakesyoucool #popular #psychologyofcool #confidence #personalitytraits #authenticity #independence #selfgrowth #living #socialconfidence #mindsetshift #2026goals #zsoltzsemba #cool -
Psychologist explains 7 personality traits of people who walk fast
-
Expert on high-intelligence shares 9 'unspoken' signs someone might be a genius
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://www.upworthy.com/signs-one-has-high-intelligence
-
PsyPost: Personality traits predict students’ use of generative AI in higher education, study finds. “Students who are curious, organized, and outgoing may be more likely to incorporate generative artificial intelligence tools into their learning, according to new research published in Scientific Reports. The findings suggest that personality plays a significant role in how students engage […]
-
"What personality trait in people raises a red flag with you?" There were plenty more possibilities I could've chosen for my response to Daily Prompts QOTD, but I chose this one...
#personalitytraits #redflags #pink #tuesdaythoughts #mindfulness #bekind #dontbeadick #writerslife #goodreads #bekindhttps://rickollie.com/2025/09/09/what-personality-trait-in-people-raises-a-red-flag-with-you-2/
-
PsyPost: AI’s personality-reading powers aren’t always what they seem, study finds. “Researchers found that some models achieve high accuracy by spotting obvious hints — such as writers explicitly mentioning their personality type — rather than interpreting subtle linguistic patterns.”
-
PsyPost: Dark personality traits linked to generative AI use among art students. “The research found that students who scored higher on personality traits like narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and materialism were more likely to engage in academic misconduct, experience academic anxiety, procrastinate, and ultimately rely more heavily on tools like ChatGPT and Midjourney.”
-
PsyPost: Extraversion, narcissism, and histrionic tendencies predict the desire to become an influencer. “A new study published in Telematics and Informatics has found that certain personality traits—particularly extraversion, narcissism, and histrionic tendencies—are linked to a greater desire among teenagers to pursue careers as social media influencers. The research, which surveyed […]
-
ABC News (Australia): How to find out your TikTok personality – and become a ‘citizen scientist’. “It’s no secret that TikTok collects data about its users, but it can be hard to know exactly how it’s being used. Do you know what your data says about you? Finding the answers to that question — both for individuals and as a society — is one of the goals of the For You Research […]
-
The Emotional Symphony: Unraveling the Neural Tapestry of Feelings
#Emotions #Neuroscience #LimbicSystem #Psychology #MindBodyConnection #EmotionalIntelligence #SelfDiscovery #SomaticExperience #MentalHealth #EmotionalAwareness #CognitiveScience #PersonalityTraits #HumanExperience #EmotionalWellbeing #Neurobiology #Psychophysiology #EmotionalHealth #EmotionalTapestry
-
𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝘿𝙤 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙏𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙖𝙮 𝘼𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙔𝙤𝙪?✨👣
Did you know that your 𝘁𝗼𝗲𝘀 hold secrets about your personality? 🤯 From 𝗥𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗘𝗴𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗲 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲𝘀, each shape reveals unique traits that mirror your psychology, behaviors, and even your destiny! 🔮
🧐 Are you the analytical type? The natural leader? The dreamer? A simple glance at your feet might have the answers! 🏛️✨
👉 𝙍𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙪𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙮𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙩𝙤𝙚𝙨? 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙗 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙘𝙤𝙥𝙮 𝙣ow
🔖 #ToesTellTales #PersonalityTraits #FootReading #KnowYourself #FunRead -
Maladaptive personality traits linked to hypersexual disorder in men, study finds https://www.psypost.org/maladaptive-personality-traits-linked-to-hypersexual-disorder-in-men-study-finds/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #HypersexualDisorder #MentalHealth #EmotionalInstability #PersonalityTraits #MenMentalHealth
-
Narcissistic traits shape the relationship between depression and suicide risk, study suggests https://www.psypost.org/narcissistic-traits-shape-the-relationship-between-depression-and-suicide-risk-study-suggests/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #Narcissism #MentalHealth #Depression #SuicidePrevention #PersonalityTraits
-
Women exhibit less manipulative personality traits in more gender-equal countries https://www.psypost.org/women-exhibit-less-manipulative-personality-traits-in-more-gender-equal-countries/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #GenderEquality #WomenEmpowerment #Machiavellianism #SocialPsychology #PersonalityTraits
-
New psychology research confirms a troubling fact about Dark Triad personality traits https://www.psypost.org/new-psychology-research-confirms-a-troubling-fact-about-dark-triad-personality-traits/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #psychology #research #DarkTriad #personalitytraits #empathy
-
New study examines personality profiles across 263 occupations https://www.psypost.org/new-study-examines-personality-profiles-across-263-occupations/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #personalityprofiles #occupations #study #research #personalitytraits
-
Of all the dark personality traits, this one shows the strongest link to crime https://www.psypost.org/of-all-the-dark-personality-traits-this-one-shows-the-strongest-link-to-crime/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #DarkPersonality #CrimeLink #PersonalityTraits #CriminalBehavior #Machiavellianism
-
Researchers test machine learning’s potential to reveal personality traits through eye tracking https://www.psypost.org/researchers-test-machine-learnings-potential-to-reveal-personality-traits-through-eye-tracking/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #MachineLearning #PersonalityTraits #EyeTracking #Machiavellianism #Extraversion
-
New psychology research reveals how one’s own personality predicts long-term relationship satisfaction https://www.psypost.org/new-psychology-research-reveals-how-ones-own-personality-predicts-long-term-relationship-satisfaction/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #psychology #research #longtermsatisfaction #personalitytraits #neuroticism
-
INTJ Women: Navigating the World as a Rare Personality Type
The INTJ woman is one of a kind. She’s smart, independent, and loves to think ahead. While she may seem quiet, her mind is always working. She plans for the future and values personal growth.
But being an INTJ woman isn’t always easy. She can face challenges in relationships and social situations because of her logical nature. In this post, we’ll explore what makes the INTJ woman so unique, and how she handles life with her strategic mind.
READ HERE: https://innermasteryhub.com/intj-women/
#intjpersonality #personalitytypes #psychology #personalitytraits #personalitytypes
#mentalhealth -
INTJ Women: Navigating the World as a Rare Personality Type
The INTJ woman is one of a kind. She’s smart, independent, and loves to think ahead. While she may seem quiet, her mind is always working. She plans for the future and values personal growth.
But being an INTJ woman isn’t always easy. She can face challenges in relationships and social situations because of her logical nature. In this post, we’ll explore what makes the INTJ woman so unique, and how she handles life with her strategic mind.
READ HERE: https://innermasteryhub.com/intj-women/
#intjpersonality #personalitytypes #psychology #personalitytraits #personalitytypes
#mentalhealth -
INTJ Women: Navigating the World as a Rare Personality Type
The INTJ woman is one of a kind. She’s smart, independent, and loves to think ahead. While she may seem quiet, her mind is always working. She plans for the future and values personal growth.
But being an INTJ woman isn’t always easy. She can face challenges in relationships and social situations because of her logical nature. In this post, we’ll explore what makes the INTJ woman so unique, and how she handles life with her strategic mind.
READ HERE: https://innermasteryhub.com/intj-women/
#intjpersonality #personalitytypes #psychology #personalitytraits #personalitytypes
#mentalhealth -
INTJ Women: Navigating the World as a Rare Personality Type
The INTJ woman is one of a kind. She’s smart, independent, and loves to think ahead. While she may seem quiet, her mind is always working. She plans for the future and values personal growth.
But being an INTJ woman isn’t always easy. She can face challenges in relationships and social situations because of her logical nature. In this post, we’ll explore what makes the INTJ woman so unique, and how she handles life with her strategic mind.
READ HERE: https://innermasteryhub.com/intj-women/
#intjpersonality #personalitytypes #psychology #personalitytraits #personalitytypes
#mentalhealth -
On the cult of #personality and #PersonalityTests that abuse #psychology:
"Sorting The Self", The Hedgehog Review (https://hedgehogreview.com/issues/missing-character/articles/sorting-the-self).
#PersonalityTraits #MBTI #MMPI #Hiring #Pseudoscience #FakeScience #Charlatans
-
Forget the proverbial wisdom: Opposites don’t really attract, study finds - What draws us to choose romantic partners? A sweeping new meta-analysis... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1992842 #behavioralgenetics #12daysofchristmas #personalitytraits #humanbehavior #psychology #science
-
Forget the proverbial wisdom: Opposites don’t really attract, study finds - What draws us to choose romantic partners? A sweeping new meta-analysis... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1992842 #behavioralgenetics #12daysofchristmas #personalitytraits #humanbehavior #psychology #science
-
Forget the proverbial wisdom: Opposites don’t really attract, study finds - What draws us to choose romantic partners? A sweeping new meta-analysis... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1992842 #behavioralgenetics #12daysofchristmas #personalitytraits #humanbehavior #psychology #science
-
Forget the proverbial wisdom: Opposites don’t really attract, study finds - What draws us to choose romantic partners? A sweeping new meta-analysis... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1992842 #behavioralgenetics #12daysofchristmas #personalitytraits #humanbehavior #psychology #science
-
Forget the proverbial wisdom: Opposites don’t really attract, study finds - What draws us to choose romantic partners? A sweeping new meta-analysis... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1992842 #behavioralgenetics #12daysofchristmas #personalitytraits #humanbehavior #psychology #science
-
On a "typical" day, outside of work or school, would you say that you are more serious than fun or more fun than serious?
#pleaseboost #polls #poll #question #temperament #psychology #identity #human #nature #humannature #humanbehavior #behavior #mastodoncommunity #mastodon #community #personality #science #personalityscience #traits #personalitytraits #humor #fun #serious #emotion #intellect #mental #disposition #attitude
-
Conscientiousness may matter less if you’re a lawyer than if you’re in sales - Enlarge (credit: Thanee Hengpattanapong / EyeEm)
Personality tests are two a penny, and most of t... more: https://arstechnica.com/?p=1593975 #behavioralscience #personalitytraits #psychology #science
