#darktriad — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #darktriad, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: July 21, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Narcissists are actually less likely to endorse left-wing authoritarianism, study finds
New research published in the journal Current Psychology suggests that narcissistic personality traits are actually linked to lower levels of left-wing authoritarianism. The findings contradict previous claims that individuals with dark personalities are widely drawn to left-wing activism simply to feed their own egos. The study provides evidence that the relationship between progressive political aggression and dark personality traits is highly complex, requiring advanced statistical techniques to fully understand.
Interest in the psychological roots of political attitudes has grown significantly in recent years. Media reports and public commentators often question whether high-profile political activists are driven by genuine moral concerns or hidden narcissistic motives. This public curiosity aligns with academic research exploring the connections between political extremism and the Dark Triad of personality traits.
The Dark Triad encompasses three distinct but related personality types. Narcissism involves grandiosity, a sense of entitlement, and a deep need for admiration. Psychopathy is characterized by impulsivity, thrill-seeking, and a profound lack of empathy. Machiavellianism involves a cynical worldview and a tendency to manipulate others for personal gain.
A specific concept known as the dark-ego-vehicle principle proposes that people with dark personality traits are attracted to certain forms of political activism. According to this idea, these individuals use ideological movements as a convenient vehicle to satisfy their own ego-driven desires, such as gaining social status or dominating others, rather than striving for actual social justice. A 2024 study introduced this principle to the scientific literature, suggesting a positive link between left-wing authoritarianism and traits like narcissism and psychopathy.
Left-wing authoritarianism, sometimes abbreviated as LWA, generally refers to a rigid, aggressive enforcement of progressive moral values. The construct involves three main dimensions. Anti-hierarchical aggression describes a willingness to challenge, oppose, or overthrow established power structures, sometimes using force. Anticonventionalism involves an absolute rejection of traditional moral values and societal norms. Top-down censorship is the preference for using governmental or institutional authority to suppress speech that the individual deems offensive or intolerant.
Alexandra (Sasha) Cook, an assistant professor of work and organizational psychology at the University of Amsterdam, noticed theoretical inconsistencies in the previous research linking narcissism to left-wing authoritarianism. Authoritarianism typically requires an individual to submit to the established norms of their specific social group. Narcissism, on the other hand, involves an inflated sense of self-importance and a desire to dominate others. Submitting to group norms seems entirely at odds with the narcissistic need to stand out and feel socially superior.
Cook and her colleagues also identified methodological issues in the 2024 study that originally proposed the dark-ego-vehicle principle. They pointed out that the previous paper relied on standard linear regressions, a basic statistical method that they claim could not adequately model the complicated, simultaneous relationships between all the sub-dimensions of the Dark Triad and left-wing authoritarianism. The researchers asserted that in standard regression models, the shared variance between multiple related traits is often obscured, leading to potentially inaccurate conclusions.
“Curiosity and possibly my own personal need for closure” led to the new investigation, Cook said. “I read the original paper and noticed that the second study did not examine two of the three LWA subdimensions, which seemed worth checking, since they are all relevant subdimensions of the same higher-order construct.”
To get a more accurate picture, the authors decided to reanalyze the original data using a more advanced statistical approach. “Also, since many of the variables are significantly correlated, it seemed relevant to assess whether the results would be robust to a method that accounts for these correlations,” Cook explained. “Since the authors made their original data publicly available, we decided to run the analyses and take a look.”
The researchers utilized the original dataset from the 2024 study. This dataset included 375 participants based in the United States. The sample was roughly split by gender, with 50.7 percent identifying as female. Additionally, 53 percent of the participants reported an affiliation with the Democratic Party.
To measure dark personality traits, the participants had completed the Short Dark Triad questionnaire, which assesses narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Left-wing authoritarianism was measured using the Left-Wing Authoritarian Index. The survey also included measures of virtue signaling, social justice commitment, age, and gender. Virtue signaling refers to the habit of expressing opinions primarily to demonstrate one’s good character and moral superiority to observers.
Cook and her team analyzed this data using structural equation modeling. Specifically, they employed a structural-after-measurement approach. This advanced statistical technique separates the estimation of the measurement models and the structural models into two distinct steps.
This method reduces complexity and increases stability, particularly when dealing with relatively small sample sizes. By accounting for how all the Dark Triad traits and authoritarian dimensions interact at the exact same time, the scientists could isolate the specific influence of each individual trait.
The analysis revealed that narcissism was negatively related to overall left-wing authoritarianism. Higher levels of narcissism actually predicted lower levels of anti-hierarchical aggression and lower levels of anticonventionalism. Narcissism showed no relationship at all with top-down censorship.
“It was a surprise that the results showed a picture that, to a large extent, was at odds with the conclusions of the original paper,” Cook told PsyPost. “Firstly, we found negative relationships between narcissism and two of the left-wing authoritarianism dimensions, which is directly opposed to the authors’ original hypotheses.”
This finding directly contradicts the prior claim that narcissistic individuals are highly attracted to left-wing authoritarianism. In fact, the data provides evidence that the exact opposite tends to be true. The researchers suggest that the previous study’s positive association between narcissism and left-wing authoritarianism was a methodological artifact. The earlier statistical method failed to account for shared overlaps between different personality traits, leading to an inaccurate conclusion about narcissistic behavior.
Cook and her colleagues did find a positive association between psychopathy and left-wing authoritarianism. Specifically, higher levels of psychopathy were linked to higher levels of anti-hierarchical aggression and anticonventionalism. But Machiavellianism, the third Dark Triad trait, was completely unrelated to left-wing authoritarianism or any of its sub-dimensions.
The researchers also looked closely at the psychological motivations behind progressive attitudes. The original 2024 paper suggested that some left-wing activists do not actually care about equality, but merely use politics to express their own antisocial needs. The new structural equation modeling analysis paints a very different picture of progressive activism.
“We also found that social justice commitment was consistently and positively associated with left-wing authoritarianism, which contradicts the original paper’s conclusion that some activists ‘do not actually strive for social justice’,” Cook said.
The data suggests that individuals who score high on left-wing authoritarianism are indeed driven by a commitment to equality and social justice. The presence of some psychopathic traits in the data does not erase the foundational role of genuine social justice motives among left-wing individuals.
“The relationships between personality and political ideology (or activism) are complex, and psychological research does not provide straightforward answers,” Cook explained. “However, our results do not support the idea that left-wing authoritarianism (as a form of left-wing ideology) is structurally driven by narcissism or egotistical needs.”
Several important limitations provide context for interpreting these findings, particularly regarding the concept of psychopathy. “When we talk about narcissism and psychopathy, we do not necessarily talk about the everyday understanding of ‘narcissist’ or ‘psychopaths’,” Cook pointed out. “There is a difference between the common understanding (and interpretation) of these words and the definitions and measures in psychological science.”
The overall levels of psychopathy reported in the sample were quite low. “In this research, we are not comparing pathological psychopaths to ‘non-psychopaths’, but we are looking at (often small) differences in agreement with statements about aspects such as high impulsivity and a tendency to want to get revenge,” Cook said.
“In the sample, the average psychopathy scores were on the lower side, which means that higher psychopathy can reflect a tendency to choose the answer option ‘slightly disagree’ or ‘neutral’ rather than ‘disagree’,” she added. “In fact, most people do not score the lowest score on a psychopathy scale (everyone can take the questionnaire for free here: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SD3/).”
The phrasing of specific questions on the psychopathy survey also presents potential issues for interpreting the data. Some items ask if a person avoids dangerous situations or gets into trouble with the law. These questions might inadvertently measure participation in political protests rather than actual psychopathy.
Other survey items present similar risks of circular reasoning. The survey asks participants if they enjoy having sex with people they hardly know as a measure of psychopathy. The researchers note that this question might simply reflect anticonventionalism or the more permissive sexual behaviors sometimes associated with progressive attitudes.
“I think it’s important that people are aware of these methodological details, and I think it is our responsibility as researchers to communicate them in a clearer way,” Cook said.
Future studies need to examine these relationships in populations with a much wider range of psychopathy scores. Scientists should also evaluate the specific wording of survey questions to ensure they are not confusing political behavior with dark personality traits.
“Personally, I am interested in investigating further why people are so ready to believe that political activism is inauthentic or driven by ulterior motives, especially when others’ views do not align with their own political beliefs,” Cook said. “I think this blocks us from truly engaging with others’ opinions and motivations.”
A comprehensive understanding of political behavior requires looking past a single focus on authoritarianism and accounting for the complex realities of human motivation.
“I think psychological research can and will offer important insights into how we can deal with political differences, but I don’t believe that looking at stable, negative personality traits of people on a specific side of the political spectrum is a particularly useful approach, because it doesn’t offer any solutions,” Cook explained.
“Beyond the specific content and findings, I think that this paper and how it came to existence show again that open science and data transparency are very relevant for psychological science,” she concluded.
The study, “The whole picture: looking, again, at left-wing authoritarianism and its associations with dark personality traits,” was authored by Alexandra (Sasha) Cook, Bertolt Meyer, and Frank Asbrock.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Narcissism #LeftWingAuthoritarianism #DarkTriad #PsychologyResearch #StructuralEquationModeling #SocialJustice #PoliticalPsychology #DarkTriad #LWA #OpenScience
-
DATE: July 21, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Narcissists are actually less likely to endorse left-wing authoritarianism, study finds
New research published in the journal Current Psychology suggests that narcissistic personality traits are actually linked to lower levels of left-wing authoritarianism. The findings contradict previous claims that individuals with dark personalities are widely drawn to left-wing activism simply to feed their own egos. The study provides evidence that the relationship between progressive political aggression and dark personality traits is highly complex, requiring advanced statistical techniques to fully understand.
Interest in the psychological roots of political attitudes has grown significantly in recent years. Media reports and public commentators often question whether high-profile political activists are driven by genuine moral concerns or hidden narcissistic motives. This public curiosity aligns with academic research exploring the connections between political extremism and the Dark Triad of personality traits.
The Dark Triad encompasses three distinct but related personality types. Narcissism involves grandiosity, a sense of entitlement, and a deep need for admiration. Psychopathy is characterized by impulsivity, thrill-seeking, and a profound lack of empathy. Machiavellianism involves a cynical worldview and a tendency to manipulate others for personal gain.
A specific concept known as the dark-ego-vehicle principle proposes that people with dark personality traits are attracted to certain forms of political activism. According to this idea, these individuals use ideological movements as a convenient vehicle to satisfy their own ego-driven desires, such as gaining social status or dominating others, rather than striving for actual social justice. A 2024 study introduced this principle to the scientific literature, suggesting a positive link between left-wing authoritarianism and traits like narcissism and psychopathy.
Left-wing authoritarianism, sometimes abbreviated as LWA, generally refers to a rigid, aggressive enforcement of progressive moral values. The construct involves three main dimensions. Anti-hierarchical aggression describes a willingness to challenge, oppose, or overthrow established power structures, sometimes using force. Anticonventionalism involves an absolute rejection of traditional moral values and societal norms. Top-down censorship is the preference for using governmental or institutional authority to suppress speech that the individual deems offensive or intolerant.
Alexandra (Sasha) Cook, an assistant professor of work and organizational psychology at the University of Amsterdam, noticed theoretical inconsistencies in the previous research linking narcissism to left-wing authoritarianism. Authoritarianism typically requires an individual to submit to the established norms of their specific social group. Narcissism, on the other hand, involves an inflated sense of self-importance and a desire to dominate others. Submitting to group norms seems entirely at odds with the narcissistic need to stand out and feel socially superior.
Cook and her colleagues also identified methodological issues in the 2024 study that originally proposed the dark-ego-vehicle principle. They pointed out that the previous paper relied on standard linear regressions, a basic statistical method that they claim could not adequately model the complicated, simultaneous relationships between all the sub-dimensions of the Dark Triad and left-wing authoritarianism. The researchers asserted that in standard regression models, the shared variance between multiple related traits is often obscured, leading to potentially inaccurate conclusions.
“Curiosity and possibly my own personal need for closure” led to the new investigation, Cook said. “I read the original paper and noticed that the second study did not examine two of the three LWA subdimensions, which seemed worth checking, since they are all relevant subdimensions of the same higher-order construct.”
To get a more accurate picture, the authors decided to reanalyze the original data using a more advanced statistical approach. “Also, since many of the variables are significantly correlated, it seemed relevant to assess whether the results would be robust to a method that accounts for these correlations,” Cook explained. “Since the authors made their original data publicly available, we decided to run the analyses and take a look.”
The researchers utilized the original dataset from the 2024 study. This dataset included 375 participants based in the United States. The sample was roughly split by gender, with 50.7 percent identifying as female. Additionally, 53 percent of the participants reported an affiliation with the Democratic Party.
To measure dark personality traits, the participants had completed the Short Dark Triad questionnaire, which assesses narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Left-wing authoritarianism was measured using the Left-Wing Authoritarian Index. The survey also included measures of virtue signaling, social justice commitment, age, and gender. Virtue signaling refers to the habit of expressing opinions primarily to demonstrate one’s good character and moral superiority to observers.
Cook and her team analyzed this data using structural equation modeling. Specifically, they employed a structural-after-measurement approach. This advanced statistical technique separates the estimation of the measurement models and the structural models into two distinct steps.
This method reduces complexity and increases stability, particularly when dealing with relatively small sample sizes. By accounting for how all the Dark Triad traits and authoritarian dimensions interact at the exact same time, the scientists could isolate the specific influence of each individual trait.
The analysis revealed that narcissism was negatively related to overall left-wing authoritarianism. Higher levels of narcissism actually predicted lower levels of anti-hierarchical aggression and lower levels of anticonventionalism. Narcissism showed no relationship at all with top-down censorship.
“It was a surprise that the results showed a picture that, to a large extent, was at odds with the conclusions of the original paper,” Cook told PsyPost. “Firstly, we found negative relationships between narcissism and two of the left-wing authoritarianism dimensions, which is directly opposed to the authors’ original hypotheses.”
This finding directly contradicts the prior claim that narcissistic individuals are highly attracted to left-wing authoritarianism. In fact, the data provides evidence that the exact opposite tends to be true. The researchers suggest that the previous study’s positive association between narcissism and left-wing authoritarianism was a methodological artifact. The earlier statistical method failed to account for shared overlaps between different personality traits, leading to an inaccurate conclusion about narcissistic behavior.
Cook and her colleagues did find a positive association between psychopathy and left-wing authoritarianism. Specifically, higher levels of psychopathy were linked to higher levels of anti-hierarchical aggression and anticonventionalism. But Machiavellianism, the third Dark Triad trait, was completely unrelated to left-wing authoritarianism or any of its sub-dimensions.
The researchers also looked closely at the psychological motivations behind progressive attitudes. The original 2024 paper suggested that some left-wing activists do not actually care about equality, but merely use politics to express their own antisocial needs. The new structural equation modeling analysis paints a very different picture of progressive activism.
“We also found that social justice commitment was consistently and positively associated with left-wing authoritarianism, which contradicts the original paper’s conclusion that some activists ‘do not actually strive for social justice’,” Cook said.
The data suggests that individuals who score high on left-wing authoritarianism are indeed driven by a commitment to equality and social justice. The presence of some psychopathic traits in the data does not erase the foundational role of genuine social justice motives among left-wing individuals.
“The relationships between personality and political ideology (or activism) are complex, and psychological research does not provide straightforward answers,” Cook explained. “However, our results do not support the idea that left-wing authoritarianism (as a form of left-wing ideology) is structurally driven by narcissism or egotistical needs.”
Several important limitations provide context for interpreting these findings, particularly regarding the concept of psychopathy. “When we talk about narcissism and psychopathy, we do not necessarily talk about the everyday understanding of ‘narcissist’ or ‘psychopaths’,” Cook pointed out. “There is a difference between the common understanding (and interpretation) of these words and the definitions and measures in psychological science.”
The overall levels of psychopathy reported in the sample were quite low. “In this research, we are not comparing pathological psychopaths to ‘non-psychopaths’, but we are looking at (often small) differences in agreement with statements about aspects such as high impulsivity and a tendency to want to get revenge,” Cook said.
“In the sample, the average psychopathy scores were on the lower side, which means that higher psychopathy can reflect a tendency to choose the answer option ‘slightly disagree’ or ‘neutral’ rather than ‘disagree’,” she added. “In fact, most people do not score the lowest score on a psychopathy scale (everyone can take the questionnaire for free here: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SD3/).”
The phrasing of specific questions on the psychopathy survey also presents potential issues for interpreting the data. Some items ask if a person avoids dangerous situations or gets into trouble with the law. These questions might inadvertently measure participation in political protests rather than actual psychopathy.
Other survey items present similar risks of circular reasoning. The survey asks participants if they enjoy having sex with people they hardly know as a measure of psychopathy. The researchers note that this question might simply reflect anticonventionalism or the more permissive sexual behaviors sometimes associated with progressive attitudes.
“I think it’s important that people are aware of these methodological details, and I think it is our responsibility as researchers to communicate them in a clearer way,” Cook said.
Future studies need to examine these relationships in populations with a much wider range of psychopathy scores. Scientists should also evaluate the specific wording of survey questions to ensure they are not confusing political behavior with dark personality traits.
“Personally, I am interested in investigating further why people are so ready to believe that political activism is inauthentic or driven by ulterior motives, especially when others’ views do not align with their own political beliefs,” Cook said. “I think this blocks us from truly engaging with others’ opinions and motivations.”
A comprehensive understanding of political behavior requires looking past a single focus on authoritarianism and accounting for the complex realities of human motivation.
“I think psychological research can and will offer important insights into how we can deal with political differences, but I don’t believe that looking at stable, negative personality traits of people on a specific side of the political spectrum is a particularly useful approach, because it doesn’t offer any solutions,” Cook explained.
“Beyond the specific content and findings, I think that this paper and how it came to existence show again that open science and data transparency are very relevant for psychological science,” she concluded.
The study, “The whole picture: looking, again, at left-wing authoritarianism and its associations with dark personality traits,” was authored by Alexandra (Sasha) Cook, Bertolt Meyer, and Frank Asbrock.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Narcissism #LeftWingAuthoritarianism #DarkTriad #PsychologyResearch #StructuralEquationModeling #SocialJustice #PoliticalPsychology #DarkTriad #LWA #OpenScience
-
8) My advice to any #woman, especially #autistic #ADHD #audhd #neurodivergent is to know you are #vulnerable. I did not.
Learn #RedFlags & what healthy relationships look like. I was love bombed & experienced sexual abuse in my relationship long before we were married.
Share the full truth with trusted people outside your relationship.
Learn what #PityTrips & #DarkTriad personality traits are & avoid those who use them!
If anything feels wrong, say no, even if you have to call the police.
-
Several studies over the last few years have looked at personality features that are common to 'dark triad' and other related traits: egoism, Machiavellianism, moral disengagement, narcissism, psychological entitlement, psychopathy, sadism, self-interest, and spitefulness. The commonality is referred to as the 'D factor'.
You can assess your own dark traits here:
-
Several studies over the last few years have looked at personality features that are common to 'dark triad' and other related traits: egoism, Machiavellianism, moral disengagement, narcissism, psychological entitlement, psychopathy, sadism, self-interest, and spitefulness. The commonality is referred to as the 'D factor'.
You can assess your own dark traits here:
-
DATE: July 2, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Narcissism and psychopathy linked to lower physical stress responses under pressure
A recent study suggests that people with higher levels of certain socially aversive personality traits, specifically narcissism and psychopathy, tend to experience lower physical and psychological reactions to acute stress. These findings provide evidence that these personality traits might offer a form of biological resilience when facing high-pressure situations. The research was published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology.
Psychologists use the term Dark Triad to describe a group of three overlapping personality traits that involve callousness and a tendency to manipulate others. These three traits are narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of self-importance, grandiosity, and a strong desire for dominance.
Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of empathy, impulsive behavior, and a tendency to ignore rules. Machiavellianism involves a strategic, calculating approach to social interactions. People high in Machiavellianism often manipulate others for personal gain without feeling remorse.
Adam O’Riordan, an assistant professor of psychology and director of the Psychophysiology, Health, and Stress Evaluation Laboratory at the University of Texas at San Antonio, wanted to understand how these traits interact with the body under pressure.
“My line of research focuses on how psychological factors influence stress coping and cardiovascular health,” O’Riordan told PsyPost. “The Dark Triad was of particular interest in this study, as recent evidence suggests that under certain circumstances, traits such as psychopathy and narcissism may confer resilience, despite their well-established maladaptive interpersonal consequences. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether Dark Triad traits (narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism) were associated with cardiovascular and psychological responses when we exposed them to stress.”
To understand how the body responds to immediate pressure, scientists look at cardiovascular reactivity. This concept refers to the physical changes in the heart and blood vessels that occur during a stressful event. For example, a person’s heart rate might increase, or their blood vessels might constrict to raise blood pressure. High cardiovascular reactivity means a person’s heart is working much harder when they feel anxious or threatened.
Over time, exaggerated physical responses to stress tend to increase the risk of developing heart disease and other health issues. A major issue with past research into personality and stress is that the three Dark Triad traits share a lot of psychological overlap. People who score high in one trait often score high in the others because all three share a common core of antagonism.
The researchers designed this project to look at all three traits at the same time to account for this overlap. Modeling the traits together allows scientists to separate out the independent, unique effects of each specific personality dimension. The researchers recruited 139 undergraduate students for a controlled laboratory experiment. The sample included slightly more women than men, and the average age of the participants was about 19 years old.
Before the testing began, the researchers screened out participants who had existing cardiovascular conditions or took medications that affect heart rate. Participants first completed a series of questionnaires to measure their baseline levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. They then sat quietly for a ten-minute resting period so the research team could record their baseline physical metrics. The scientists measured systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate at regular intervals during this resting phase.
After the resting period, participants completed a highly demanding mental arithmetic task designed to induce acute psychological stress. They were asked to start with the number 1022 and continuously subtract the number 13. They had to calculate the math in their heads and speak their answers out loud to the research team.
If a participant made a math error or took longer than ten seconds to provide an answer, the researcher forced them to start over from the very beginning. To make the situation feel even more uncomfortable, the researcher wore a white laboratory coat. This detail was intended to create a sense of formal social evaluation and psychological distance between the participant and the observer.
Blood pressure and heart rate monitors continuously measured the participants’ physical responses throughout the five-minute math challenge. The researchers calculated cardiovascular reactivity by subtracting the participants’ resting baseline measurements from their stressful math task measurements. The researchers also accounted for factors like age, gender, smoking habits, and body weight to ensure these outside variables did not skew the results. Right before and immediately after the task, participants also rated how stressed and anxious they felt on a numerical scale.
The mental math task successfully caused significant increases in both physical and psychological stress across the group. Heart rates went up, blood pressure spiked, and participants reported feeling much more anxious than they did before the task began. However, how strongly the participants reacted depended on their specific personality traits.
Participants who scored higher in narcissism reported feeling significantly less anxious after the task compared to other participants. Higher narcissism also predicted lower increases in systolic blood pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats. Additionally, highly narcissistic individuals showed lower increases in mean arterial pressure, which represents the average pressure in the blood vessels during a single heartbeat.
Psychopathy also influenced how participants responded to the uncomfortable math challenge. People with higher psychopathy scores reported finding the task significantly less stressful overall. These individuals also displayed a much smaller increase in their heart rate during the difficult math problems.
Machiavellianism did not show a strong connection to physical stress responses in the initial tests. To make sure their findings were accurate, the researchers ran additional statistical models that included all three Dark Triad traits at the very same time. This statistical step helps separate the unique effects of each trait from their shared manipulative characteristics.
When looking at all three traits simultaneously, the link between narcissism and lower mean arterial pressure remained significant. The connection between psychopathy and a lower heart rate response also stayed strong. The association between narcissism and lower subjective anxiety remained consistent in these stricter models as well.
A few of the initial findings lost their statistical significance during these stricter tests. The relationship between narcissism and lower systolic blood pressure became too weak to be considered a robust effect. The link between psychopathy and lower self-reported stress also faded in the adjusted models. Interestingly, when all traits were combined, Machiavellianism actually predicted slightly higher levels of subjective anxiety.
O’Riordan summarized the primary takeaways from the experiment. He noted that the findings offer a new perspective on these typically negative personality types. “Our findings reveal that individuals high in narcissism and psychopathy report lower levels of anxiety, experience less stress, and exhibit lower blood pressure and heart rate responses when exposed to psychological stress,” O’Riordan said.
“Therefore, while these traits have a ‘dark’ side and are often viewed as maladaptive due to their antagonistic core, there also appears to be something about these traits that may help individuals cope with stress more effectively,” O’Riordan said. “Whether this is driven by a sense of superiority, a belief that one is better than others, or a more callous and emotionally numb mood, remains an open question for our future research to address.”
While these findings are informative, the authors point out a few limitations to the current study. The questionnaires used to measure the Dark Triad traits were relatively short and did not capture every subtle dimension of the personalities. For example, the survey mainly measured grandiose narcissism but missed vulnerable narcissism, which involves insecurity and defensiveness.
The statistical reliability of the personality surveys in this sample was also somewhat modest. This means the questions might not have measured the traits as perfectly as a longer, more detailed survey would have. Another limitation involves the specific group of people who participated in the experiment.
The sample was entirely made up of healthy young college students. The physiological effects might look different in older adults or people with existing health conditions. The laboratory task also represented just one specific type of acute stress. Real-world stressors involving more intense social judgments or personal threats could potentially trigger different physical reactions.
Some scientists suspect that a low physical response to stress might actually be a sign of emotional blunting. Emotional blunting happens when the brain fails to process important emotional information properly, which can lead to maladaptive behaviors. However, because highly narcissistic and psychopathic participants reported feeling genuinely less anxious, the authors suspect their low physical reactions reflect a protective form of biological resilience.
This resilience might help explain why some socially aversive traits are linked to better long-term cardiovascular health in certain situations. The ability to keep one’s heart rate and blood pressure stable under pressure offers a physical advantage. This suggests that traits like narcissism and psychopathy, despite their negative social consequences, provide an internal buffer against the physical wear and tear of daily stress.
The study, “Examining the association between the dark triad personality traits and cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress,” was authored by Adam O’Riordan, Tyler L. Minnigh, and Aisling M. Costello.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Narcissism #Psychopathy #DarkTriad #CardiovascularReactivity #StressResponse #Psychophysiology #MentalMathStress #StressAndHealth #EmotionalBlunting #Resilience
-
DATE: July 2, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Narcissism and psychopathy linked to lower physical stress responses under pressure
A recent study suggests that people with higher levels of certain socially aversive personality traits, specifically narcissism and psychopathy, tend to experience lower physical and psychological reactions to acute stress. These findings provide evidence that these personality traits might offer a form of biological resilience when facing high-pressure situations. The research was published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology.
Psychologists use the term Dark Triad to describe a group of three overlapping personality traits that involve callousness and a tendency to manipulate others. These three traits are narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of self-importance, grandiosity, and a strong desire for dominance.
Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of empathy, impulsive behavior, and a tendency to ignore rules. Machiavellianism involves a strategic, calculating approach to social interactions. People high in Machiavellianism often manipulate others for personal gain without feeling remorse.
Adam O’Riordan, an assistant professor of psychology and director of the Psychophysiology, Health, and Stress Evaluation Laboratory at the University of Texas at San Antonio, wanted to understand how these traits interact with the body under pressure.
“My line of research focuses on how psychological factors influence stress coping and cardiovascular health,” O’Riordan told PsyPost. “The Dark Triad was of particular interest in this study, as recent evidence suggests that under certain circumstances, traits such as psychopathy and narcissism may confer resilience, despite their well-established maladaptive interpersonal consequences. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether Dark Triad traits (narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism) were associated with cardiovascular and psychological responses when we exposed them to stress.”
To understand how the body responds to immediate pressure, scientists look at cardiovascular reactivity. This concept refers to the physical changes in the heart and blood vessels that occur during a stressful event. For example, a person’s heart rate might increase, or their blood vessels might constrict to raise blood pressure. High cardiovascular reactivity means a person’s heart is working much harder when they feel anxious or threatened.
Over time, exaggerated physical responses to stress tend to increase the risk of developing heart disease and other health issues. A major issue with past research into personality and stress is that the three Dark Triad traits share a lot of psychological overlap. People who score high in one trait often score high in the others because all three share a common core of antagonism.
The researchers designed this project to look at all three traits at the same time to account for this overlap. Modeling the traits together allows scientists to separate out the independent, unique effects of each specific personality dimension. The researchers recruited 139 undergraduate students for a controlled laboratory experiment. The sample included slightly more women than men, and the average age of the participants was about 19 years old.
Before the testing began, the researchers screened out participants who had existing cardiovascular conditions or took medications that affect heart rate. Participants first completed a series of questionnaires to measure their baseline levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. They then sat quietly for a ten-minute resting period so the research team could record their baseline physical metrics. The scientists measured systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate at regular intervals during this resting phase.
After the resting period, participants completed a highly demanding mental arithmetic task designed to induce acute psychological stress. They were asked to start with the number 1022 and continuously subtract the number 13. They had to calculate the math in their heads and speak their answers out loud to the research team.
If a participant made a math error or took longer than ten seconds to provide an answer, the researcher forced them to start over from the very beginning. To make the situation feel even more uncomfortable, the researcher wore a white laboratory coat. This detail was intended to create a sense of formal social evaluation and psychological distance between the participant and the observer.
Blood pressure and heart rate monitors continuously measured the participants’ physical responses throughout the five-minute math challenge. The researchers calculated cardiovascular reactivity by subtracting the participants’ resting baseline measurements from their stressful math task measurements. The researchers also accounted for factors like age, gender, smoking habits, and body weight to ensure these outside variables did not skew the results. Right before and immediately after the task, participants also rated how stressed and anxious they felt on a numerical scale.
The mental math task successfully caused significant increases in both physical and psychological stress across the group. Heart rates went up, blood pressure spiked, and participants reported feeling much more anxious than they did before the task began. However, how strongly the participants reacted depended on their specific personality traits.
Participants who scored higher in narcissism reported feeling significantly less anxious after the task compared to other participants. Higher narcissism also predicted lower increases in systolic blood pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats. Additionally, highly narcissistic individuals showed lower increases in mean arterial pressure, which represents the average pressure in the blood vessels during a single heartbeat.
Psychopathy also influenced how participants responded to the uncomfortable math challenge. People with higher psychopathy scores reported finding the task significantly less stressful overall. These individuals also displayed a much smaller increase in their heart rate during the difficult math problems.
Machiavellianism did not show a strong connection to physical stress responses in the initial tests. To make sure their findings were accurate, the researchers ran additional statistical models that included all three Dark Triad traits at the very same time. This statistical step helps separate the unique effects of each trait from their shared manipulative characteristics.
When looking at all three traits simultaneously, the link between narcissism and lower mean arterial pressure remained significant. The connection between psychopathy and a lower heart rate response also stayed strong. The association between narcissism and lower subjective anxiety remained consistent in these stricter models as well.
A few of the initial findings lost their statistical significance during these stricter tests. The relationship between narcissism and lower systolic blood pressure became too weak to be considered a robust effect. The link between psychopathy and lower self-reported stress also faded in the adjusted models. Interestingly, when all traits were combined, Machiavellianism actually predicted slightly higher levels of subjective anxiety.
O’Riordan summarized the primary takeaways from the experiment. He noted that the findings offer a new perspective on these typically negative personality types. “Our findings reveal that individuals high in narcissism and psychopathy report lower levels of anxiety, experience less stress, and exhibit lower blood pressure and heart rate responses when exposed to psychological stress,” O’Riordan said.
“Therefore, while these traits have a ‘dark’ side and are often viewed as maladaptive due to their antagonistic core, there also appears to be something about these traits that may help individuals cope with stress more effectively,” O’Riordan said. “Whether this is driven by a sense of superiority, a belief that one is better than others, or a more callous and emotionally numb mood, remains an open question for our future research to address.”
While these findings are informative, the authors point out a few limitations to the current study. The questionnaires used to measure the Dark Triad traits were relatively short and did not capture every subtle dimension of the personalities. For example, the survey mainly measured grandiose narcissism but missed vulnerable narcissism, which involves insecurity and defensiveness.
The statistical reliability of the personality surveys in this sample was also somewhat modest. This means the questions might not have measured the traits as perfectly as a longer, more detailed survey would have. Another limitation involves the specific group of people who participated in the experiment.
The sample was entirely made up of healthy young college students. The physiological effects might look different in older adults or people with existing health conditions. The laboratory task also represented just one specific type of acute stress. Real-world stressors involving more intense social judgments or personal threats could potentially trigger different physical reactions.
Some scientists suspect that a low physical response to stress might actually be a sign of emotional blunting. Emotional blunting happens when the brain fails to process important emotional information properly, which can lead to maladaptive behaviors. However, because highly narcissistic and psychopathic participants reported feeling genuinely less anxious, the authors suspect their low physical reactions reflect a protective form of biological resilience.
This resilience might help explain why some socially aversive traits are linked to better long-term cardiovascular health in certain situations. The ability to keep one’s heart rate and blood pressure stable under pressure offers a physical advantage. This suggests that traits like narcissism and psychopathy, despite their negative social consequences, provide an internal buffer against the physical wear and tear of daily stress.
The study, “Examining the association between the dark triad personality traits and cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress,” was authored by Adam O’Riordan, Tyler L. Minnigh, and Aisling M. Costello.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Narcissism #Psychopathy #DarkTriad #CardiovascularReactivity #StressResponse #Psychophysiology #MentalMathStress #StressAndHealth #EmotionalBlunting #Resilience
-
DATE: July 2, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Narcissism and psychopathy linked to lower physical stress responses under pressure
A recent study suggests that people with higher levels of certain socially aversive personality traits, specifically narcissism and psychopathy, tend to experience lower physical and psychological reactions to acute stress. These findings provide evidence that these personality traits might offer a form of biological resilience when facing high-pressure situations. The research was published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology.
Psychologists use the term Dark Triad to describe a group of three overlapping personality traits that involve callousness and a tendency to manipulate others. These three traits are narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of self-importance, grandiosity, and a strong desire for dominance.
Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of empathy, impulsive behavior, and a tendency to ignore rules. Machiavellianism involves a strategic, calculating approach to social interactions. People high in Machiavellianism often manipulate others for personal gain without feeling remorse.
Adam O’Riordan, an assistant professor of psychology and director of the Psychophysiology, Health, and Stress Evaluation Laboratory at the University of Texas at San Antonio, wanted to understand how these traits interact with the body under pressure.
“My line of research focuses on how psychological factors influence stress coping and cardiovascular health,” O’Riordan told PsyPost. “The Dark Triad was of particular interest in this study, as recent evidence suggests that under certain circumstances, traits such as psychopathy and narcissism may confer resilience, despite their well-established maladaptive interpersonal consequences. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether Dark Triad traits (narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism) were associated with cardiovascular and psychological responses when we exposed them to stress.”
To understand how the body responds to immediate pressure, scientists look at cardiovascular reactivity. This concept refers to the physical changes in the heart and blood vessels that occur during a stressful event. For example, a person’s heart rate might increase, or their blood vessels might constrict to raise blood pressure. High cardiovascular reactivity means a person’s heart is working much harder when they feel anxious or threatened.
Over time, exaggerated physical responses to stress tend to increase the risk of developing heart disease and other health issues. A major issue with past research into personality and stress is that the three Dark Triad traits share a lot of psychological overlap. People who score high in one trait often score high in the others because all three share a common core of antagonism.
The researchers designed this project to look at all three traits at the same time to account for this overlap. Modeling the traits together allows scientists to separate out the independent, unique effects of each specific personality dimension. The researchers recruited 139 undergraduate students for a controlled laboratory experiment. The sample included slightly more women than men, and the average age of the participants was about 19 years old.
Before the testing began, the researchers screened out participants who had existing cardiovascular conditions or took medications that affect heart rate. Participants first completed a series of questionnaires to measure their baseline levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. They then sat quietly for a ten-minute resting period so the research team could record their baseline physical metrics. The scientists measured systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate at regular intervals during this resting phase.
After the resting period, participants completed a highly demanding mental arithmetic task designed to induce acute psychological stress. They were asked to start with the number 1022 and continuously subtract the number 13. They had to calculate the math in their heads and speak their answers out loud to the research team.
If a participant made a math error or took longer than ten seconds to provide an answer, the researcher forced them to start over from the very beginning. To make the situation feel even more uncomfortable, the researcher wore a white laboratory coat. This detail was intended to create a sense of formal social evaluation and psychological distance between the participant and the observer.
Blood pressure and heart rate monitors continuously measured the participants’ physical responses throughout the five-minute math challenge. The researchers calculated cardiovascular reactivity by subtracting the participants’ resting baseline measurements from their stressful math task measurements. The researchers also accounted for factors like age, gender, smoking habits, and body weight to ensure these outside variables did not skew the results. Right before and immediately after the task, participants also rated how stressed and anxious they felt on a numerical scale.
The mental math task successfully caused significant increases in both physical and psychological stress across the group. Heart rates went up, blood pressure spiked, and participants reported feeling much more anxious than they did before the task began. However, how strongly the participants reacted depended on their specific personality traits.
Participants who scored higher in narcissism reported feeling significantly less anxious after the task compared to other participants. Higher narcissism also predicted lower increases in systolic blood pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats. Additionally, highly narcissistic individuals showed lower increases in mean arterial pressure, which represents the average pressure in the blood vessels during a single heartbeat.
Psychopathy also influenced how participants responded to the uncomfortable math challenge. People with higher psychopathy scores reported finding the task significantly less stressful overall. These individuals also displayed a much smaller increase in their heart rate during the difficult math problems.
Machiavellianism did not show a strong connection to physical stress responses in the initial tests. To make sure their findings were accurate, the researchers ran additional statistical models that included all three Dark Triad traits at the very same time. This statistical step helps separate the unique effects of each trait from their shared manipulative characteristics.
When looking at all three traits simultaneously, the link between narcissism and lower mean arterial pressure remained significant. The connection between psychopathy and a lower heart rate response also stayed strong. The association between narcissism and lower subjective anxiety remained consistent in these stricter models as well.
A few of the initial findings lost their statistical significance during these stricter tests. The relationship between narcissism and lower systolic blood pressure became too weak to be considered a robust effect. The link between psychopathy and lower self-reported stress also faded in the adjusted models. Interestingly, when all traits were combined, Machiavellianism actually predicted slightly higher levels of subjective anxiety.
O’Riordan summarized the primary takeaways from the experiment. He noted that the findings offer a new perspective on these typically negative personality types. “Our findings reveal that individuals high in narcissism and psychopathy report lower levels of anxiety, experience less stress, and exhibit lower blood pressure and heart rate responses when exposed to psychological stress,” O’Riordan said.
“Therefore, while these traits have a ‘dark’ side and are often viewed as maladaptive due to their antagonistic core, there also appears to be something about these traits that may help individuals cope with stress more effectively,” O’Riordan said. “Whether this is driven by a sense of superiority, a belief that one is better than others, or a more callous and emotionally numb mood, remains an open question for our future research to address.”
While these findings are informative, the authors point out a few limitations to the current study. The questionnaires used to measure the Dark Triad traits were relatively short and did not capture every subtle dimension of the personalities. For example, the survey mainly measured grandiose narcissism but missed vulnerable narcissism, which involves insecurity and defensiveness.
The statistical reliability of the personality surveys in this sample was also somewhat modest. This means the questions might not have measured the traits as perfectly as a longer, more detailed survey would have. Another limitation involves the specific group of people who participated in the experiment.
The sample was entirely made up of healthy young college students. The physiological effects might look different in older adults or people with existing health conditions. The laboratory task also represented just one specific type of acute stress. Real-world stressors involving more intense social judgments or personal threats could potentially trigger different physical reactions.
Some scientists suspect that a low physical response to stress might actually be a sign of emotional blunting. Emotional blunting happens when the brain fails to process important emotional information properly, which can lead to maladaptive behaviors. However, because highly narcissistic and psychopathic participants reported feeling genuinely less anxious, the authors suspect their low physical reactions reflect a protective form of biological resilience.
This resilience might help explain why some socially aversive traits are linked to better long-term cardiovascular health in certain situations. The ability to keep one’s heart rate and blood pressure stable under pressure offers a physical advantage. This suggests that traits like narcissism and psychopathy, despite their negative social consequences, provide an internal buffer against the physical wear and tear of daily stress.
The study, “Examining the association between the dark triad personality traits and cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress,” was authored by Adam O’Riordan, Tyler L. Minnigh, and Aisling M. Costello.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #Narcissism #Psychopathy #DarkTriad #CardiovascularReactivity #StressResponse #Psychophysiology #MentalMathStress #StressAndHealth #EmotionalBlunting #Resilience
-
DATE: June 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Authoritarianism acts as a psychological bridge for dark personalities, study finds
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
People with antagonistic personality traits often express their self-centered tendencies through rigid, authoritarian political beliefs, which can act as a bridge to managing their self-control. A recent study suggests that these harsh personality characteristics rely on a strict adherence to authority and tradition to justify punishing others, rather than operating through a direct desire for social dominance. These findings were published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.
Psychological researchers have proposed that aggressive and prejudiced social attitudes stem from two main motivational pathways in a framework known as the dual process model of prejudice. This approach separates ideological motivations into two distinct trajectories. One path is driven by a preference for social hierarchy, while the other is driven by a need for social order.
The first pathway is characterized by a preference for group-based inequality and social status. Psychologists call this social dominance orientation. People who score high in this area view the world as a competitive arena where certain groups naturally deserve to hold power over others.
The second pathway centers on strict obedience to established authorities and traditional norms. This is referred to as right-wing authoritarianism. Individuals with these tendencies perceive the world as a dangerous place, reacting to perceived threats with moral absolutism and a desire to punish those who break the rules.
Both of these ideological pathways have been associated with aggressive personality profiles. Recent psychological frameworks have identified a unified core for these antagonistic characteristics, termed the dark factor of personality. This core represents a general tendency to maximize personal gains at the expense of others while justifying the resulting harm.
This dark core encompasses several well-known traits, including narcissism, psychopathy, and sadism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of superiority, psychopathy entails low empathy and impulsivity, and sadism involves deriving pleasure from the suffering of others. Rather than operating independently, these traits manifest as different expressions of the same underlying disposition.
To understand how these dark traits translate into behavior, researchers examine self-regulatory processes like emotion regulation and self-control. Emotion regulation involves the ability to manage and respond to emotional experiences gracefully. Self-control is the capacity to override impulses to achieve long-term goals or adhere to social standards.
Psychologist Fernanda Otoni at the Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná and her colleagues set out to investigate how these elements connect. They designed a study to see if authoritarian beliefs act as a psychological bridge between antagonistic personalities and a person’s ability to regulate their emotions and impulses. Their goal was to integrate personality, ideology, and self-regulation into a single explanatory model.
The researchers recruited 498 adult participants from various regions of Brazil. The volunteers ranged in age from 18 to 71, with an average age of about 33. The group was relatively balanced in terms of gender, and participants represented a wide spectrum of political affiliations.
Each participant completed a series of psychological questionnaires designed to assess multiple dimensions of their personality and behavior. One survey measured the dark factor of personality, asking respondents to rate their agreement with statements reflecting callousness, deceitfulness, and vindictiveness. Other surveys measured their levels of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
To evaluate self-regulation, the team used two additional scales. The first measured general self-control, capturing the respondents’ perceived ability to resist temptation and maintain discipline. The second assessed difficulties in emotion regulation, identifying issues such as emotional impulsivity and an inability to accept negative feelings.
The researchers analyzed the responses using a statistical technique called path analysis. This method allows scientists to examine the directional links between multiple different variables simultaneously. They looked specifically for indirect pathways, where authoritarian beliefs might connect a dark personality to specific self-regulatory abilities.
They found that the dark factor of personality was entirely connected to self-control through right-wing authoritarianism. In this sample, individuals with highly antagonistic dispositions reported stricter adherence to traditional authorities and a greater willingness to punish rule-breakers. This authoritarian rigidity, in turn, was associated with their reported levels of self-control.
The results suggest that self-control is not always an adaptive, positive force. In people with high levels of dispositional antagonism, the ability to control impulses might function as a strategic tool rather than a purely protective capacity. They might use disciplined rule-following and punitive authoritarian beliefs as a socially acceptable way to express their hostility.
A surprising pattern emerged regarding social dominance orientation. A desire for hierarchical group relations did not act as a bridge between the dark personality factor and self-regulation. The statistical models showed no mediating effect for this variable on either self-control or emotional difficulties.
This lack of a relationship might be explained by the specific cultural context in which the study took place. In historically unequal societies like Brazil, social hierarchies are often sustained by traditional institutions and ingrained cultural norms. In such environments, individuals might not need explicit, self-serving personality traits to endorse anti-egalitarian beliefs.
The study also revealed insights into how emotion regulation operates. The researchers noted that difficulties in managing emotions had a direct, inverse relationship with self-control. This connection persisted even when accounting for the dark personality factor and authoritarian ideologies.
These emotional deficits did not appear to drive adherence to right-wing authoritarianism or social dominance orientation. The association between ideological beliefs and emotional dysregulation was very weak. This challenges the assumption that authoritarian individuals simply lack the capacity to cope with negative emotions.
Instead, the data support the idea that emotional regulation and self-control operate as distinct, relatively independent domains. People with maladaptive regulatory strategies, such as constantly suppressing their feelings, often struggle to maintain basic self-control. This regulatory failure seems to happen apart from their political or social worldviews.
The researchers detailed a few limitations to their investigation. Because the data came from self-reported questionnaires, the responses might be influenced by social desirability bias. Participants might have altered their answers to appear more favorable, especially regarding sensitive topics like prejudice and aggression.
The study relied on observational data gathered at a single point in time. This design means the results cannot prove that a dark personality alters someone’s authoritarian beliefs or diminishes their self-control. The associations only highlight how these psychological traits tend to cluster together in the population.
The statistical model used by the research team explained only a modest amount of the variation in the participants’ responses. This indicates that other unmeasured factors likely play a role in shaping how people regulate their emotions and form ideological beliefs. Socioeconomic status, childhood environments, and other personality traits might fill in the missing pieces.
Future investigations could expand on this framework by incorporating different cultural backgrounds and measures of social inequality. Including data that tracks individuals over many years would also help clarify the developmental timeline of these traits. Expanding psychological research beyond Western, industrialized populations remains an essential goal for the broader scientific community.
The study, “The dark core and the dual process of prejudice: When self-control and emotional dysregulation serve antagonistic ends,” was authored by Fernanda Otoni, Ariela Raíssa Lima-Costa, Antônio Silvério da Rocha Neto, Victória Sobreira Gonçalves, Ligia Ziegler Samuel, and Bruno Bonfá-Araujo.
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DarkCoreOfPersonality #RightWingAuthoritarianism #SelfControl #EmotionalDysregulation #SocialDominanceOrientation #PrejudiceResearch #PsychologyStudy #DarkTriad #AuthoritarianBeliefs #SelfRegulationBridge
-
DATE: June 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Authoritarianism acts as a psychological bridge for dark personalities, study finds
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
People with antagonistic personality traits often express their self-centered tendencies through rigid, authoritarian political beliefs, which can act as a bridge to managing their self-control. A recent study suggests that these harsh personality characteristics rely on a strict adherence to authority and tradition to justify punishing others, rather than operating through a direct desire for social dominance. These findings were published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.
Psychological researchers have proposed that aggressive and prejudiced social attitudes stem from two main motivational pathways in a framework known as the dual process model of prejudice. This approach separates ideological motivations into two distinct trajectories. One path is driven by a preference for social hierarchy, while the other is driven by a need for social order.
The first pathway is characterized by a preference for group-based inequality and social status. Psychologists call this social dominance orientation. People who score high in this area view the world as a competitive arena where certain groups naturally deserve to hold power over others.
The second pathway centers on strict obedience to established authorities and traditional norms. This is referred to as right-wing authoritarianism. Individuals with these tendencies perceive the world as a dangerous place, reacting to perceived threats with moral absolutism and a desire to punish those who break the rules.
Both of these ideological pathways have been associated with aggressive personality profiles. Recent psychological frameworks have identified a unified core for these antagonistic characteristics, termed the dark factor of personality. This core represents a general tendency to maximize personal gains at the expense of others while justifying the resulting harm.
This dark core encompasses several well-known traits, including narcissism, psychopathy, and sadism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of superiority, psychopathy entails low empathy and impulsivity, and sadism involves deriving pleasure from the suffering of others. Rather than operating independently, these traits manifest as different expressions of the same underlying disposition.
To understand how these dark traits translate into behavior, researchers examine self-regulatory processes like emotion regulation and self-control. Emotion regulation involves the ability to manage and respond to emotional experiences gracefully. Self-control is the capacity to override impulses to achieve long-term goals or adhere to social standards.
Psychologist Fernanda Otoni at the Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná and her colleagues set out to investigate how these elements connect. They designed a study to see if authoritarian beliefs act as a psychological bridge between antagonistic personalities and a person’s ability to regulate their emotions and impulses. Their goal was to integrate personality, ideology, and self-regulation into a single explanatory model.
The researchers recruited 498 adult participants from various regions of Brazil. The volunteers ranged in age from 18 to 71, with an average age of about 33. The group was relatively balanced in terms of gender, and participants represented a wide spectrum of political affiliations.
Each participant completed a series of psychological questionnaires designed to assess multiple dimensions of their personality and behavior. One survey measured the dark factor of personality, asking respondents to rate their agreement with statements reflecting callousness, deceitfulness, and vindictiveness. Other surveys measured their levels of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
To evaluate self-regulation, the team used two additional scales. The first measured general self-control, capturing the respondents’ perceived ability to resist temptation and maintain discipline. The second assessed difficulties in emotion regulation, identifying issues such as emotional impulsivity and an inability to accept negative feelings.
The researchers analyzed the responses using a statistical technique called path analysis. This method allows scientists to examine the directional links between multiple different variables simultaneously. They looked specifically for indirect pathways, where authoritarian beliefs might connect a dark personality to specific self-regulatory abilities.
They found that the dark factor of personality was entirely connected to self-control through right-wing authoritarianism. In this sample, individuals with highly antagonistic dispositions reported stricter adherence to traditional authorities and a greater willingness to punish rule-breakers. This authoritarian rigidity, in turn, was associated with their reported levels of self-control.
The results suggest that self-control is not always an adaptive, positive force. In people with high levels of dispositional antagonism, the ability to control impulses might function as a strategic tool rather than a purely protective capacity. They might use disciplined rule-following and punitive authoritarian beliefs as a socially acceptable way to express their hostility.
A surprising pattern emerged regarding social dominance orientation. A desire for hierarchical group relations did not act as a bridge between the dark personality factor and self-regulation. The statistical models showed no mediating effect for this variable on either self-control or emotional difficulties.
This lack of a relationship might be explained by the specific cultural context in which the study took place. In historically unequal societies like Brazil, social hierarchies are often sustained by traditional institutions and ingrained cultural norms. In such environments, individuals might not need explicit, self-serving personality traits to endorse anti-egalitarian beliefs.
The study also revealed insights into how emotion regulation operates. The researchers noted that difficulties in managing emotions had a direct, inverse relationship with self-control. This connection persisted even when accounting for the dark personality factor and authoritarian ideologies.
These emotional deficits did not appear to drive adherence to right-wing authoritarianism or social dominance orientation. The association between ideological beliefs and emotional dysregulation was very weak. This challenges the assumption that authoritarian individuals simply lack the capacity to cope with negative emotions.
Instead, the data support the idea that emotional regulation and self-control operate as distinct, relatively independent domains. People with maladaptive regulatory strategies, such as constantly suppressing their feelings, often struggle to maintain basic self-control. This regulatory failure seems to happen apart from their political or social worldviews.
The researchers detailed a few limitations to their investigation. Because the data came from self-reported questionnaires, the responses might be influenced by social desirability bias. Participants might have altered their answers to appear more favorable, especially regarding sensitive topics like prejudice and aggression.
The study relied on observational data gathered at a single point in time. This design means the results cannot prove that a dark personality alters someone’s authoritarian beliefs or diminishes their self-control. The associations only highlight how these psychological traits tend to cluster together in the population.
The statistical model used by the research team explained only a modest amount of the variation in the participants’ responses. This indicates that other unmeasured factors likely play a role in shaping how people regulate their emotions and form ideological beliefs. Socioeconomic status, childhood environments, and other personality traits might fill in the missing pieces.
Future investigations could expand on this framework by incorporating different cultural backgrounds and measures of social inequality. Including data that tracks individuals over many years would also help clarify the developmental timeline of these traits. Expanding psychological research beyond Western, industrialized populations remains an essential goal for the broader scientific community.
The study, “The dark core and the dual process of prejudice: When self-control and emotional dysregulation serve antagonistic ends,” was authored by Fernanda Otoni, Ariela Raíssa Lima-Costa, Antônio Silvério da Rocha Neto, Victória Sobreira Gonçalves, Ligia Ziegler Samuel, and Bruno Bonfá-Araujo.
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DarkCoreOfPersonality #RightWingAuthoritarianism #SelfControl #EmotionalDysregulation #SocialDominanceOrientation #PrejudiceResearch #PsychologyStudy #DarkTriad #AuthoritarianBeliefs #SelfRegulationBridge
-
DATE: June 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Authoritarianism acts as a psychological bridge for dark personalities, study finds
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
People with antagonistic personality traits often express their self-centered tendencies through rigid, authoritarian political beliefs, which can act as a bridge to managing their self-control. A recent study suggests that these harsh personality characteristics rely on a strict adherence to authority and tradition to justify punishing others, rather than operating through a direct desire for social dominance. These findings were published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.
Psychological researchers have proposed that aggressive and prejudiced social attitudes stem from two main motivational pathways in a framework known as the dual process model of prejudice. This approach separates ideological motivations into two distinct trajectories. One path is driven by a preference for social hierarchy, while the other is driven by a need for social order.
The first pathway is characterized by a preference for group-based inequality and social status. Psychologists call this social dominance orientation. People who score high in this area view the world as a competitive arena where certain groups naturally deserve to hold power over others.
The second pathway centers on strict obedience to established authorities and traditional norms. This is referred to as right-wing authoritarianism. Individuals with these tendencies perceive the world as a dangerous place, reacting to perceived threats with moral absolutism and a desire to punish those who break the rules.
Both of these ideological pathways have been associated with aggressive personality profiles. Recent psychological frameworks have identified a unified core for these antagonistic characteristics, termed the dark factor of personality. This core represents a general tendency to maximize personal gains at the expense of others while justifying the resulting harm.
This dark core encompasses several well-known traits, including narcissism, psychopathy, and sadism. Narcissism involves an inflated sense of superiority, psychopathy entails low empathy and impulsivity, and sadism involves deriving pleasure from the suffering of others. Rather than operating independently, these traits manifest as different expressions of the same underlying disposition.
To understand how these dark traits translate into behavior, researchers examine self-regulatory processes like emotion regulation and self-control. Emotion regulation involves the ability to manage and respond to emotional experiences gracefully. Self-control is the capacity to override impulses to achieve long-term goals or adhere to social standards.
Psychologist Fernanda Otoni at the Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná and her colleagues set out to investigate how these elements connect. They designed a study to see if authoritarian beliefs act as a psychological bridge between antagonistic personalities and a person’s ability to regulate their emotions and impulses. Their goal was to integrate personality, ideology, and self-regulation into a single explanatory model.
The researchers recruited 498 adult participants from various regions of Brazil. The volunteers ranged in age from 18 to 71, with an average age of about 33. The group was relatively balanced in terms of gender, and participants represented a wide spectrum of political affiliations.
Each participant completed a series of psychological questionnaires designed to assess multiple dimensions of their personality and behavior. One survey measured the dark factor of personality, asking respondents to rate their agreement with statements reflecting callousness, deceitfulness, and vindictiveness. Other surveys measured their levels of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
To evaluate self-regulation, the team used two additional scales. The first measured general self-control, capturing the respondents’ perceived ability to resist temptation and maintain discipline. The second assessed difficulties in emotion regulation, identifying issues such as emotional impulsivity and an inability to accept negative feelings.
The researchers analyzed the responses using a statistical technique called path analysis. This method allows scientists to examine the directional links between multiple different variables simultaneously. They looked specifically for indirect pathways, where authoritarian beliefs might connect a dark personality to specific self-regulatory abilities.
They found that the dark factor of personality was entirely connected to self-control through right-wing authoritarianism. In this sample, individuals with highly antagonistic dispositions reported stricter adherence to traditional authorities and a greater willingness to punish rule-breakers. This authoritarian rigidity, in turn, was associated with their reported levels of self-control.
The results suggest that self-control is not always an adaptive, positive force. In people with high levels of dispositional antagonism, the ability to control impulses might function as a strategic tool rather than a purely protective capacity. They might use disciplined rule-following and punitive authoritarian beliefs as a socially acceptable way to express their hostility.
A surprising pattern emerged regarding social dominance orientation. A desire for hierarchical group relations did not act as a bridge between the dark personality factor and self-regulation. The statistical models showed no mediating effect for this variable on either self-control or emotional difficulties.
This lack of a relationship might be explained by the specific cultural context in which the study took place. In historically unequal societies like Brazil, social hierarchies are often sustained by traditional institutions and ingrained cultural norms. In such environments, individuals might not need explicit, self-serving personality traits to endorse anti-egalitarian beliefs.
The study also revealed insights into how emotion regulation operates. The researchers noted that difficulties in managing emotions had a direct, inverse relationship with self-control. This connection persisted even when accounting for the dark personality factor and authoritarian ideologies.
These emotional deficits did not appear to drive adherence to right-wing authoritarianism or social dominance orientation. The association between ideological beliefs and emotional dysregulation was very weak. This challenges the assumption that authoritarian individuals simply lack the capacity to cope with negative emotions.
Instead, the data support the idea that emotional regulation and self-control operate as distinct, relatively independent domains. People with maladaptive regulatory strategies, such as constantly suppressing their feelings, often struggle to maintain basic self-control. This regulatory failure seems to happen apart from their political or social worldviews.
The researchers detailed a few limitations to their investigation. Because the data came from self-reported questionnaires, the responses might be influenced by social desirability bias. Participants might have altered their answers to appear more favorable, especially regarding sensitive topics like prejudice and aggression.
The study relied on observational data gathered at a single point in time. This design means the results cannot prove that a dark personality alters someone’s authoritarian beliefs or diminishes their self-control. The associations only highlight how these psychological traits tend to cluster together in the population.
The statistical model used by the research team explained only a modest amount of the variation in the participants’ responses. This indicates that other unmeasured factors likely play a role in shaping how people regulate their emotions and form ideological beliefs. Socioeconomic status, childhood environments, and other personality traits might fill in the missing pieces.
Future investigations could expand on this framework by incorporating different cultural backgrounds and measures of social inequality. Including data that tracks individuals over many years would also help clarify the developmental timeline of these traits. Expanding psychological research beyond Western, industrialized populations remains an essential goal for the broader scientific community.
The study, “The dark core and the dual process of prejudice: When self-control and emotional dysregulation serve antagonistic ends,” was authored by Fernanda Otoni, Ariela Raíssa Lima-Costa, Antônio Silvério da Rocha Neto, Victória Sobreira Gonçalves, Ligia Ziegler Samuel, and Bruno Bonfá-Araujo.
URL: https://www.psypost.org/how-strict-authoritarian-beliefs-help-mask-dark-personality-traits/
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DarkCoreOfPersonality #RightWingAuthoritarianism #SelfControl #EmotionalDysregulation #SocialDominanceOrientation #PrejudiceResearch #PsychologyStudy #DarkTriad #AuthoritarianBeliefs #SelfRegulationBridge
-
CW: Analysis: Political Landscape, Moral Grandstanding, and the Dark Tetrad.
After watching Maternal Instinct, I decided to watch some follow-up videos regarding the defendant because this particular case heavily involved fraud and deception. As someone that is interested in the intersection of psychology, criminology, and cybersecurity (i.e., behavioral analysis and threat hunting), I found this case to be particularly interesting regarding the social engineering tactics involved.
While doing research, I stumbled upon the "Dark Tetrad." While I was already somewhat familiar with the Dark Triad, this adds new elements to that existing psychological research regarding the pleasure from other's suffering. I couldn't help but to look back and consider my own online trolling/angry responses regarding the polarized political climate over the last decade. While I have since stepped back from social media (and really all big tech controlled environments), I couldn't help but feel guilty about my past behavior after reading about the dark tetrad.
In digital spaces, we often witness users flippantly applying maximum-severity labels (e.g., "Nazi") to minor policy disagreements. While tribalism explains the majority, psychological research shows that some of the instigators of these trends often exhibit Dark Tetrad traits such as sadism and Machiavellianism. For them, the label isn't historical analysis; it’s a high-potency payload used deliberately to cause psychological distress and social chaos.
From a threat assessment perspective, this creates a lot of noise and a "Boy Who Cried Wolf" vulnerability. When the baseline social alarm system is constantly blaring false positives over trivial matters, society's ability to recognize and respond to a genuine, cascading systemic crisis is catastrophically degraded.
Mainstream social architectures are built to optimize engagement by exploiting these dark psychological traits. By rewarding outrage with visibility, algorithms allow malicious actors to manipulate the middle ground out of existence. They weaponize moral grandstanding to convert ordinary users into force multipliers for polarization.
Moving to decentralized spaces like Mastodon isn't just about escaping noise; it’s about choosing a platform architecture that refuses to incentivize moral grandstanding and Dark Tetrad manipulation. In cybersecurity, we rely on logs and objective data. We need to apply that same analytical discipline to how we evaluate and filter human behavior online.
#InfoSec #Cybersecurity #Psychology #Criminology #DarkTetrad #DarkTriad
-
DATE: June 21, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Study explores how attachment style, dark triad traits, and sexual coercion impact romantic couples
The quality of a romantic partnership depends heavily on how people form emotional bonds, with certain personality traits and aggressive behaviors playing a lesser but still notable role. According to a recent study published in Personality and Individual Differences, women’s relationship satisfaction is most strongly tied to their own attachment styles and their partner’s behaviors, while men’s satisfaction is closely linked to experiencing or initiating sexual coercion. These findings highlight the different ways romantic partners influence each other’s happiness and relationship stability.
From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, relationship satisfaction serves a specific function. Researchers view it as a subjective evaluation of the costs and benefits of staying in a specific partnership. A satisfying relationship historically offered reproductive advantages, helping couples stay together to raise children in a stable environment.
A variety of personal characteristics can influence this sense of satisfaction. One of the most prominent is adult attachment. Attachment theory describes how people respond to emotional closeness and the potential for rejection.
Some individuals develop a secure attachment style, meaning they are comfortable with intimacy and trust their partners. Others develop insecure attachment styles, which generally fall into two categories: anxious and avoidant. Anxiously attached individuals constantly worry about their partner’s availability and fear rejection. Avoidantly attached individuals feel discomfort with emotional closeness and prefer to maintain physical and psychological distance.
Researchers are also interested in how socially aversive personality traits influence romantic partnerships. These characteristics are often grouped into the Dark Triad. This includes narcissism, which involves egocentrism and a constant need for admiration. It also includes Machiavellianism, characterized by manipulative behavior, and psychopathy, marked by high impulsivity and a lack of empathy.
Another major factor that imposes costs on a relationship is sexual coercion. This involves a person using psychological pressure, manipulation, or physical threats to force a romantic partner into unwanted sexual activity. Coercion can involve being the victim of these behaviors or being the perpetrator who initiates them.
Lead author André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida and his colleagues conducted a two-part investigation to see how all these factors work together. Previous research often looked at these variables in isolated pairs, such as how attachment style relates to relationship satisfaction. The research team wanted to use an advanced statistical approach to evaluate all these overlapping traits and behaviors simultaneously.
By testing everything at once, the researchers could identify which traits genuinely predict relationship happiness when other personality factors are taken into account. They designed a two-part investigation that looked at people on an individual level and also analyzed pairs of romantic partners.
In the first study, the researchers surveyed 848 individuals who had been in a romantic relationship for at least twelve months. The participants completed questionnaires measuring their relationship satisfaction, attachment styles, Dark Triad traits, and experiences with sexual coercion. The sample was overwhelmingly female, with women making up about 88 percent of the group.
The statistical models revealed that a woman’s relationship satisfaction was predicted entirely by her own attachment style. Higher levels of insecure attachment were associated with lower relationship satisfaction. Dark Triad personality traits and sexual coercion did not predict a woman’s romantic fulfillment in this initial model.
The researchers noted that the lack of a link between a woman’s satisfaction and her experience of sexual coercion is a repeating pattern in relationship science. Some studies suggest that subtle forms of coercion, such as emotional manipulation or excessive demands for time, might be misinterpreted by victims. In a cultural context with strong patriarchal norms, these behaviors might be viewed as signs of a partner’s commitment rather than abusive tactics.
The survey also looked at what predicts sexual coercion. For women, being a victim of sexual coercion was predicted by their own perpetration of coercion. This reflects a phenomenon known as victim-perpetrator overlap, where individuals who experience relationship aggression are highly likely to inflict it as well.
A woman’s likelihood of perpetrating sexual coercion was predicted by her levels of anxious attachment and her Dark Triad traits. This suggests that a deep fear of relationship abandonment, combined with antisocial personality tendencies, can manifest as sexually aggressive behavior.
For the men in the first study, none of the variables predicted relationship satisfaction, victimization, or perpetration. The researchers determined these results were not statistically significant. This lack of predictive power was likely due to the small number of male participants in this phase of the research, which limited the statistical strength of the analysis.
To understand how these traits operate within an active relationship, the researchers conducted a second study featuring 55 heterosexual couples. Both partners participated in a joint video call with a researcher while completing their surveys independently. This method allowed the group to analyze how one person’s traits predicted their own satisfaction as well as their partner’s satisfaction.
In this dyadic study, a woman’s relationship satisfaction was negatively predicted by her own avoidant attachment style. Her happiness was also negatively predicted by her male partner’s traits. Specifically, if her partner had an anxious attachment style, exhibited narcissism, or perpetrated sexual coercion, her satisfaction dropped.
The male partners showed a different pattern. A man’s relationship satisfaction was not predicted by his own attachment style or his own dark personality traits. Instead, a man’s satisfaction was negatively predicted by his own experience as a victim of sexual coercion.
A man’s satisfaction was also tied to the perpetration of coercion. His relationship happiness dropped if he perpetrated coercion against his partner. His satisfaction also dropped if his female partner perpetrated sexual coercion against him.
The differences between the two studies highlight the importance of looking at both individuals and couples. When women were studied individually, their satisfaction seemed tied only to their internal attachment styles. When women were studied alongside their partners, it became obvious that they were highly sensitive to their partner’s emotional state, narcissism, and aggressive behaviors.
Men, on the other hand, did not show strong links between their satisfaction and abstract personality traits. Instead, their relationship fulfillment was tied closely to concrete negative experiences, particularly the presence of sexual coercion in the relationship.
The researchers noted several caveats to their findings. The first study featured a massive gender imbalance, which made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about men on an individual basis. The second study featured a relatively small sample size of couples, making the results exploratory.
Additionally, the couples who agreed to participate in a joint video interview might have been happier overall than average couples. Partners in highly abusive or dissatisfied relationships were likely to avoid volunteering for this type of research. The data was also collected in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily among young, educated individuals with their own incomes, which limits how broadly the findings can be applied.
Future research should attempt to replicate these models with larger and more diverse groups of couples. Scientists also need to investigate further why women sometimes do not perceive sexual coercion as a negative factor in their relationship satisfaction until specific dyadic testing is applied.
The study, “Sexual coercion and relationship satisfaction: Dyadic and individual contributions of attachment and dark triad traits,” was authored by André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida, Sarah Torres Teixeira de Mello, Michella Vaz de Castro, and Mauro Dias Silva Júnior.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #RelationshipSatisfaction #AttachmentTheory #DarkTriad #SexualCoercion #RomanticRelationships #RelationshipResearch #DyadicStudy #PsychologyStudies #EvolutionaryPsychology #CouplesWellBeing
-
DATE: June 21, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Study explores how attachment style, dark triad traits, and sexual coercion impact romantic couples
The quality of a romantic partnership depends heavily on how people form emotional bonds, with certain personality traits and aggressive behaviors playing a lesser but still notable role. According to a recent study published in Personality and Individual Differences, women’s relationship satisfaction is most strongly tied to their own attachment styles and their partner’s behaviors, while men’s satisfaction is closely linked to experiencing or initiating sexual coercion. These findings highlight the different ways romantic partners influence each other’s happiness and relationship stability.
From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, relationship satisfaction serves a specific function. Researchers view it as a subjective evaluation of the costs and benefits of staying in a specific partnership. A satisfying relationship historically offered reproductive advantages, helping couples stay together to raise children in a stable environment.
A variety of personal characteristics can influence this sense of satisfaction. One of the most prominent is adult attachment. Attachment theory describes how people respond to emotional closeness and the potential for rejection.
Some individuals develop a secure attachment style, meaning they are comfortable with intimacy and trust their partners. Others develop insecure attachment styles, which generally fall into two categories: anxious and avoidant. Anxiously attached individuals constantly worry about their partner’s availability and fear rejection. Avoidantly attached individuals feel discomfort with emotional closeness and prefer to maintain physical and psychological distance.
Researchers are also interested in how socially aversive personality traits influence romantic partnerships. These characteristics are often grouped into the Dark Triad. This includes narcissism, which involves egocentrism and a constant need for admiration. It also includes Machiavellianism, characterized by manipulative behavior, and psychopathy, marked by high impulsivity and a lack of empathy.
Another major factor that imposes costs on a relationship is sexual coercion. This involves a person using psychological pressure, manipulation, or physical threats to force a romantic partner into unwanted sexual activity. Coercion can involve being the victim of these behaviors or being the perpetrator who initiates them.
Lead author André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida and his colleagues conducted a two-part investigation to see how all these factors work together. Previous research often looked at these variables in isolated pairs, such as how attachment style relates to relationship satisfaction. The research team wanted to use an advanced statistical approach to evaluate all these overlapping traits and behaviors simultaneously.
By testing everything at once, the researchers could identify which traits genuinely predict relationship happiness when other personality factors are taken into account. They designed a two-part investigation that looked at people on an individual level and also analyzed pairs of romantic partners.
In the first study, the researchers surveyed 848 individuals who had been in a romantic relationship for at least twelve months. The participants completed questionnaires measuring their relationship satisfaction, attachment styles, Dark Triad traits, and experiences with sexual coercion. The sample was overwhelmingly female, with women making up about 88 percent of the group.
The statistical models revealed that a woman’s relationship satisfaction was predicted entirely by her own attachment style. Higher levels of insecure attachment were associated with lower relationship satisfaction. Dark Triad personality traits and sexual coercion did not predict a woman’s romantic fulfillment in this initial model.
The researchers noted that the lack of a link between a woman’s satisfaction and her experience of sexual coercion is a repeating pattern in relationship science. Some studies suggest that subtle forms of coercion, such as emotional manipulation or excessive demands for time, might be misinterpreted by victims. In a cultural context with strong patriarchal norms, these behaviors might be viewed as signs of a partner’s commitment rather than abusive tactics.
The survey also looked at what predicts sexual coercion. For women, being a victim of sexual coercion was predicted by their own perpetration of coercion. This reflects a phenomenon known as victim-perpetrator overlap, where individuals who experience relationship aggression are highly likely to inflict it as well.
A woman’s likelihood of perpetrating sexual coercion was predicted by her levels of anxious attachment and her Dark Triad traits. This suggests that a deep fear of relationship abandonment, combined with antisocial personality tendencies, can manifest as sexually aggressive behavior.
For the men in the first study, none of the variables predicted relationship satisfaction, victimization, or perpetration. The researchers determined these results were not statistically significant. This lack of predictive power was likely due to the small number of male participants in this phase of the research, which limited the statistical strength of the analysis.
To understand how these traits operate within an active relationship, the researchers conducted a second study featuring 55 heterosexual couples. Both partners participated in a joint video call with a researcher while completing their surveys independently. This method allowed the group to analyze how one person’s traits predicted their own satisfaction as well as their partner’s satisfaction.
In this dyadic study, a woman’s relationship satisfaction was negatively predicted by her own avoidant attachment style. Her happiness was also negatively predicted by her male partner’s traits. Specifically, if her partner had an anxious attachment style, exhibited narcissism, or perpetrated sexual coercion, her satisfaction dropped.
The male partners showed a different pattern. A man’s relationship satisfaction was not predicted by his own attachment style or his own dark personality traits. Instead, a man’s satisfaction was negatively predicted by his own experience as a victim of sexual coercion.
A man’s satisfaction was also tied to the perpetration of coercion. His relationship happiness dropped if he perpetrated coercion against his partner. His satisfaction also dropped if his female partner perpetrated sexual coercion against him.
The differences between the two studies highlight the importance of looking at both individuals and couples. When women were studied individually, their satisfaction seemed tied only to their internal attachment styles. When women were studied alongside their partners, it became obvious that they were highly sensitive to their partner’s emotional state, narcissism, and aggressive behaviors.
Men, on the other hand, did not show strong links between their satisfaction and abstract personality traits. Instead, their relationship fulfillment was tied closely to concrete negative experiences, particularly the presence of sexual coercion in the relationship.
The researchers noted several caveats to their findings. The first study featured a massive gender imbalance, which made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about men on an individual basis. The second study featured a relatively small sample size of couples, making the results exploratory.
Additionally, the couples who agreed to participate in a joint video interview might have been happier overall than average couples. Partners in highly abusive or dissatisfied relationships were likely to avoid volunteering for this type of research. The data was also collected in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily among young, educated individuals with their own incomes, which limits how broadly the findings can be applied.
Future research should attempt to replicate these models with larger and more diverse groups of couples. Scientists also need to investigate further why women sometimes do not perceive sexual coercion as a negative factor in their relationship satisfaction until specific dyadic testing is applied.
The study, “Sexual coercion and relationship satisfaction: Dyadic and individual contributions of attachment and dark triad traits,” was authored by André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida, Sarah Torres Teixeira de Mello, Michella Vaz de Castro, and Mauro Dias Silva Júnior.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #RelationshipSatisfaction #AttachmentTheory #DarkTriad #SexualCoercion #RomanticRelationships #RelationshipResearch #DyadicStudy #PsychologyStudies #EvolutionaryPsychology #CouplesWellBeing
-
DATE: June 21, 2026 at 04:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Study explores how attachment style, dark triad traits, and sexual coercion impact romantic couples
The quality of a romantic partnership depends heavily on how people form emotional bonds, with certain personality traits and aggressive behaviors playing a lesser but still notable role. According to a recent study published in Personality and Individual Differences, women’s relationship satisfaction is most strongly tied to their own attachment styles and their partner’s behaviors, while men’s satisfaction is closely linked to experiencing or initiating sexual coercion. These findings highlight the different ways romantic partners influence each other’s happiness and relationship stability.
From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, relationship satisfaction serves a specific function. Researchers view it as a subjective evaluation of the costs and benefits of staying in a specific partnership. A satisfying relationship historically offered reproductive advantages, helping couples stay together to raise children in a stable environment.
A variety of personal characteristics can influence this sense of satisfaction. One of the most prominent is adult attachment. Attachment theory describes how people respond to emotional closeness and the potential for rejection.
Some individuals develop a secure attachment style, meaning they are comfortable with intimacy and trust their partners. Others develop insecure attachment styles, which generally fall into two categories: anxious and avoidant. Anxiously attached individuals constantly worry about their partner’s availability and fear rejection. Avoidantly attached individuals feel discomfort with emotional closeness and prefer to maintain physical and psychological distance.
Researchers are also interested in how socially aversive personality traits influence romantic partnerships. These characteristics are often grouped into the Dark Triad. This includes narcissism, which involves egocentrism and a constant need for admiration. It also includes Machiavellianism, characterized by manipulative behavior, and psychopathy, marked by high impulsivity and a lack of empathy.
Another major factor that imposes costs on a relationship is sexual coercion. This involves a person using psychological pressure, manipulation, or physical threats to force a romantic partner into unwanted sexual activity. Coercion can involve being the victim of these behaviors or being the perpetrator who initiates them.
Lead author André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida and his colleagues conducted a two-part investigation to see how all these factors work together. Previous research often looked at these variables in isolated pairs, such as how attachment style relates to relationship satisfaction. The research team wanted to use an advanced statistical approach to evaluate all these overlapping traits and behaviors simultaneously.
By testing everything at once, the researchers could identify which traits genuinely predict relationship happiness when other personality factors are taken into account. They designed a two-part investigation that looked at people on an individual level and also analyzed pairs of romantic partners.
In the first study, the researchers surveyed 848 individuals who had been in a romantic relationship for at least twelve months. The participants completed questionnaires measuring their relationship satisfaction, attachment styles, Dark Triad traits, and experiences with sexual coercion. The sample was overwhelmingly female, with women making up about 88 percent of the group.
The statistical models revealed that a woman’s relationship satisfaction was predicted entirely by her own attachment style. Higher levels of insecure attachment were associated with lower relationship satisfaction. Dark Triad personality traits and sexual coercion did not predict a woman’s romantic fulfillment in this initial model.
The researchers noted that the lack of a link between a woman’s satisfaction and her experience of sexual coercion is a repeating pattern in relationship science. Some studies suggest that subtle forms of coercion, such as emotional manipulation or excessive demands for time, might be misinterpreted by victims. In a cultural context with strong patriarchal norms, these behaviors might be viewed as signs of a partner’s commitment rather than abusive tactics.
The survey also looked at what predicts sexual coercion. For women, being a victim of sexual coercion was predicted by their own perpetration of coercion. This reflects a phenomenon known as victim-perpetrator overlap, where individuals who experience relationship aggression are highly likely to inflict it as well.
A woman’s likelihood of perpetrating sexual coercion was predicted by her levels of anxious attachment and her Dark Triad traits. This suggests that a deep fear of relationship abandonment, combined with antisocial personality tendencies, can manifest as sexually aggressive behavior.
For the men in the first study, none of the variables predicted relationship satisfaction, victimization, or perpetration. The researchers determined these results were not statistically significant. This lack of predictive power was likely due to the small number of male participants in this phase of the research, which limited the statistical strength of the analysis.
To understand how these traits operate within an active relationship, the researchers conducted a second study featuring 55 heterosexual couples. Both partners participated in a joint video call with a researcher while completing their surveys independently. This method allowed the group to analyze how one person’s traits predicted their own satisfaction as well as their partner’s satisfaction.
In this dyadic study, a woman’s relationship satisfaction was negatively predicted by her own avoidant attachment style. Her happiness was also negatively predicted by her male partner’s traits. Specifically, if her partner had an anxious attachment style, exhibited narcissism, or perpetrated sexual coercion, her satisfaction dropped.
The male partners showed a different pattern. A man’s relationship satisfaction was not predicted by his own attachment style or his own dark personality traits. Instead, a man’s satisfaction was negatively predicted by his own experience as a victim of sexual coercion.
A man’s satisfaction was also tied to the perpetration of coercion. His relationship happiness dropped if he perpetrated coercion against his partner. His satisfaction also dropped if his female partner perpetrated sexual coercion against him.
The differences between the two studies highlight the importance of looking at both individuals and couples. When women were studied individually, their satisfaction seemed tied only to their internal attachment styles. When women were studied alongside their partners, it became obvious that they were highly sensitive to their partner’s emotional state, narcissism, and aggressive behaviors.
Men, on the other hand, did not show strong links between their satisfaction and abstract personality traits. Instead, their relationship fulfillment was tied closely to concrete negative experiences, particularly the presence of sexual coercion in the relationship.
The researchers noted several caveats to their findings. The first study featured a massive gender imbalance, which made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about men on an individual basis. The second study featured a relatively small sample size of couples, making the results exploratory.
Additionally, the couples who agreed to participate in a joint video interview might have been happier overall than average couples. Partners in highly abusive or dissatisfied relationships were likely to avoid volunteering for this type of research. The data was also collected in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily among young, educated individuals with their own incomes, which limits how broadly the findings can be applied.
Future research should attempt to replicate these models with larger and more diverse groups of couples. Scientists also need to investigate further why women sometimes do not perceive sexual coercion as a negative factor in their relationship satisfaction until specific dyadic testing is applied.
The study, “Sexual coercion and relationship satisfaction: Dyadic and individual contributions of attachment and dark triad traits,” was authored by André Luís Moura de Oliveira Almeida, Sarah Torres Teixeira de Mello, Michella Vaz de Castro, and Mauro Dias Silva Júnior.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #RelationshipSatisfaction #AttachmentTheory #DarkTriad #SexualCoercion #RomanticRelationships #RelationshipResearch #DyadicStudy #PsychologyStudies #EvolutionaryPsychology #CouplesWellBeing
-
Are there escape from #narcissists #psychopaths #darktriad help groups?
There must be somewhere to go where there is help from former victims who get it.
#Disabled &/or severely ill people too on a limited income. If I was healthy with money I wouldn’t be trapped here.
They’re all counseling after escaping.
I need to get out first! -
Are there escape from #narcissists #psychopaths #darktriad help groups?
There must be somewhere to go where there is help from former victims who get it.
#Disabled &/or severely ill people too on a limited income. If I was healthy with money I wouldn’t be trapped here.
They’re all counseling after escaping.
I need to get out first! -
Are there escape from #narcissists #psychopaths #darktriad help groups?
There must be somewhere to go where there is help from former victims who get it.
Disabled &/or severely ill people too on a limited income. If I was healthy with money I wouldn’t be trapped here.
It’s all recovery groups. I need to escape first! -
Are there escape from #narcissists #psychopaths #darktriad help groups?
There must be somewhere to go where there is help from former victims who get it.
Disabled &/or severely ill people too on a limited income. If I was healthy with money I wouldn’t be trapped here.
It’s all recovery groups. I need to escape first! -
@DerLogiker @georgetakei Trump is worse, actually.
Letter to congressional leaders from psychiatrists: 'President Trump exhibits what forensic mental health experts have, across dozens of independent assessments, identified as the “Dark Triad” of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.'
They describe the evidence that he's dangerously unstable, that his "judgment is, by every visible measure, severely compromised" and that "he is a constitutional emergency."
"Top psychiatrists issue urgent letter to Congress about Trump's mental instability" https://www.alternet.org/psychiatrists-trump/
#Trump #DarkTriad #narcissism #narcissist #Machiavellian #Machiavellianism #psychopath #psychopathy #unstable #25thAmendment #2547th #25th
-
@DerLogiker @georgetakei Trump is worse, actually.
Letter to congressional leaders from psychiatrists: 'President Trump exhibits what forensic mental health experts have, across dozens of independent assessments, identified as the “Dark Triad” of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.'
They describe the evidence that he's dangerously unstable, that his "judgment is, by every visible measure, severely compromised" and that "he is a constitutional emergency."
"Top psychiatrists issue urgent letter to Congress about Trump's mental instability" https://www.alternet.org/psychiatrists-trump/
#Trump #DarkTriad #narcissism #narcissist #Machiavellian #Machiavellianism #psychopath #psychopathy #unstable #25thAmendment #2547th #25th
-
The greatest threat to #Empath personality-types is not in fact the #DarkTriad personalities that target them, but the adoption of #Altruist traits by the Empath
Put bluntly, you can’t help anyone unless you first help yourself, and you can’t walk a mile in another person’s shoes unless you first know yourself
But, that is why the #Narcissist favours altruism-themed shaming as an abuse tactic, weaving it through every stage of Narcissistic Abuse; it is not merely effective, it is the most harmful. The fact that Western society endows altruism with implicit moral authority is secondary, a bonus, which lets them get away with it in public.
-
The greatest threat to #Empath personality-types is not in fact the #DarkTriad personalities that target them, but the adoption of #Altruist traits by the Empath
Put bluntly, you can’t help anyone unless you first help yourself, and you can’t walk a mile in another person’s shoes unless you first know yourself
But, that is why the #Narcissist favours altruism-themed shaming as an abuse tactic, weaving it through every stage of Narcissistic Abuse; it is not merely effective, it is the most harmful. The fact that Western society endows altruism with implicit moral authority is secondary, a bonus, which lets them get away with it in public.
-
The greatest threat to #Empath personality-types is not in fact the #DarkTriad personalities that target them, but the adoption of #Altruist traits by the Empath
Put bluntly, you can’t help anyone unless you first help yourself, and you can’t walk a mile in another person’s shoes unless you first know yourself
But, that is why the #Narcissist favours altruism-themed shaming as an abuse tactic, weaving it through every stage of Narcissistic Abuse; it is not merely effective, it is the most harmful. The fact that Western society endows altruism with implicit moral authority is secondary, a bonus, which lets them get away with it in public.
-
The greatest threat to #Empath personality-types is not in fact the #DarkTriad personalities that target them, but the adoption of #Altruist traits by the Empath
Put bluntly, you can’t help anyone unless you first help yourself, and you can’t walk a mile in another person’s shoes unless you first know yourself
But, that is why the #Narcissist favours altruism-themed shaming as an abuse tactic, weaving it through every stage of Narcissistic Abuse; it is not merely effective, it is the most harmful. The fact that Western society endows altruism with implicit moral authority is secondary, a bonus, which lets them get away with it in public.
-
The greatest threat to #Empath personality-types is not in fact the #DarkTriad personalities that target them, but the adoption of #Altruist traits by the Empath
Put bluntly, you can’t help anyone unless you first help yourself, and you can’t walk a mile in another person’s shoes unless you first know yourself
But, that is why the #Narcissist favours altruism-themed shaming as an abuse tactic, weaving it through every stage of Narcissistic Abuse; it is not merely effective, it is the most harmful. The fact that Western society endows altruism with implicit moral authority is secondary, a bonus, which lets them get away with it in public.
-
Every #Psychopath always causes as much harm as possible satisfying their selfish desires at the expense of others as they are able to get away with
Not as little harm as necessary to get what they want
As much as they can
Always
The only difference to single out the #CriminalPsychopath is that their core delusion has progressed to the extent that even while in custody they are convinced they’re getting away with it. So yes, the full horror of psychopathy is on display for all to see. But that’s it. That’s the only difference. Optics.
-
Every #Psychopath always causes as much harm as possible satisfying their selfish desires at the expense of others as they are able to get away with
Not as little harm as necessary to get what they want
As much as they can
Always
The only difference to single out the #CriminalPsychopath is that their core delusion has progressed to the extent that even while in custody they are convinced they’re getting away with it. So yes, the full horror of psychopathy is on display for all to see. But that’s it. That’s the only difference. Optics.
-
What interested me was when Factor-1 gets its own scales rather than mixing it with Factor-2, my scores rise substantially. That's because when you shift all the explosive impulsiveness and recklessness from a general #psychopathy checklist, my form becomes far more obvious
Anyway, you are welcome to ask questions about what being a #psychopath is like
#mentalhealth #personalitydisorders #clusterb #apd #aspd #darktriad
-
What interested me was when Factor-1 gets its own scales rather than mixing it with Factor-2, my scores rise substantially. That's because when you shift all the explosive impulsiveness and recklessness from a general #psychopathy checklist, my form becomes far more obvious
Anyway, you are welcome to ask questions about what being a #psychopath is like
#mentalhealth #personalitydisorders #clusterb #apd #aspd #darktriad
-
What interested me was when Factor-1 gets its own scales rather than mixing it with Factor-2, my scores rise substantially. That's because when you shift all the explosive impulsiveness and recklessness from a general #psychopathy checklist, my form becomes far more obvious
Anyway, you are welcome to ask questions about what being a #psychopath is like
#mentalhealth #personalitydisorders #clusterb #apd #aspd #darktriad
-
What interested me was when Factor-1 gets its own scales rather than mixing it with Factor-2, my scores rise substantially. That's because when you shift all the explosive impulsiveness and recklessness from a general #psychopathy checklist, my form becomes far more obvious
Anyway, you are welcome to ask questions about what being a #psychopath is like
#mentalhealth #personalitydisorders #clusterb #apd #aspd #darktriad
-
"“Based on our findings, there does not appear to be a specific attraction between light and dark personalities,” Kesenheimer told PsyPost. “Rather, individuals with light personalities are more likely to place trust in people who are typically rejected by others.”"
“It is important to clarify that light personalities – loving and trusting individuals – do not actively choose dark personalities (nor is the reverse true),” Kesenheimer added. “Instead, the key finding is that individuals with light personalities are less likely to reject those whom others tend to reject. This highlights how a general tendency to see the good in people, while often positive, may also reduce selectivity in romantic contexts.”
-
"“Based on our findings, there does not appear to be a specific attraction between light and dark personalities,” Kesenheimer told PsyPost. “Rather, individuals with light personalities are more likely to place trust in people who are typically rejected by others.”"
“It is important to clarify that light personalities – loving and trusting individuals – do not actively choose dark personalities (nor is the reverse true),” Kesenheimer added. “Instead, the key finding is that individuals with light personalities are less likely to reject those whom others tend to reject. This highlights how a general tendency to see the good in people, while often positive, may also reduce selectivity in romantic contexts.”
-
1- When I was younger) I thought that the lessons of #WWII would forever inoculate us against overt fascism.
2- When I was younger) I though that humanity, in general, had evolved past the point were SF scenarios of #DystopianTech , making existential decisions for us, could ever really happen.
Only took ~15 yrs of #DarkTriad #AlgorithmSocialMedia , elevating all batsh!t ideas to mainstream, to trigger both.
#DisasterCapitalist #Technofeudalism plus #Technofascism means
#The21stCenturySucks -
1- When I was younger) I thought that the lessons of #WWII would forever inoculate us against overt fascism.
2- When I was younger) I though that humanity, in general, had evolved past the point were SF scenarios of #DystopianTech , making existential decisions for us, could ever really happen.
Only took ~15 yrs of #DarkTriad #AlgorithmSocialMedia , elevating all batsh!t ideas to mainstream, to trigger both.
#DisasterCapitalist #Technofeudalism plus #Technofascism means
#The21stCenturySucks -
1- When I was younger) I thought that the lessons of #WWII would forever inoculate us against overt fascism.
2- When I was younger) I though that humanity, in general, had evolved past the point were SF scenarios of #DystopianTech , making existential decisions for us, could ever really happen.
Only took ~15 yrs of #DarkTriad #AlgorithmSocialMedia , elevating all batsh!t ideas to mainstream, to trigger both.
#DisasterCapitalist #Technofeudalism plus #Technofascism means
#The21stCenturySucks -
1- When I was younger) I thought that the lessons of #WWII would forever inoculate us against overt fascism.
2- When I was younger) I though that humanity, in general, had evolved past the point were SF scenarios of #DystopianTech , making existential decisions for us, could ever really happen.
Only took ~15 yrs of #DarkTriad #AlgorithmSocialMedia , elevating all batsh!t ideas to mainstream, to trigger both.
#DisasterCapitalist #Technofeudalism plus #Technofascism means
#The21stCenturySucks -
1- When I was younger) I thought that the lessons of #WWII would forever inoculate us against overt fascism.
2- When I was younger) I though that humanity, in general, had evolved past the point were SF scenarios of #DystopianTech , making existential decisions for us, could ever really happen.
Only took ~15 yrs of #DarkTriad #AlgorithmSocialMedia , elevating all batsh!t ideas to mainstream, to trigger both.
#DisasterCapitalist #Technofeudalism plus #Technofascism means
#The21stCenturySucks -
CW: Too boring for words.
I am drafting a "rules of association". It is partly an exercise, and partly an guess at of something that may become real.
Starting with the standard rules for an "unincorporated association": (https://www.acnc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/download_template_rules_for_unincorporated_associations_with_notes_pdf_639kb_.pdf)
But I am tired of organisations infiltrated by arseholes, and I wonder if it is possible to put standards of behaviour front and centre.
I am inspired by Mastodon's "No Nazis", but I am not sure it is either specific, nor general enough.Please help. Does your group have something-like this? What have I missed, and, in the interests of sanity, what has been double-defined?
---
17. Membership hurdles.
17.1 The association insists on the following psychological characteristics and standards of behaviour from all members.
17.2 No member will be accepted, and existing members will be expelled if they fail any of these hurdles.
17.3 The psychological characteristics. Members must not be:
i. psychopaths,
ii. sociopaths,
iii. narcissists,
iv. liars,
v. egomaniacs.
17.4 The standards of behaviour. Members must never indulge in :
i. crime,
ii. racism,
iii. misogyny,
iv. criticism of person,
v. aggression, threats, shaming,
vi. coercive control,
vii.prejudice, bigotry.
17.5 The association explicitly rejects the notion that a person’s ability can replace or diminish their need to clear these hurdles. The most able and talented member will be expelled if they fail.#rules #DarkTriad #constitution #legalese #IANAL #arseholes #governance
-
CW: Too boring for words.
I am drafting a "rules of association". It is partly an exercise, and partly an guess at of something that may become real.
Starting with the standard rules for an "unincorporated association": (https://www.acnc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/download_template_rules_for_unincorporated_associations_with_notes_pdf_639kb_.pdf)
But I am tired of organisations infiltrated by arseholes, and I wonder if it is possible to put standards of behaviour front and centre.
I am inspired by Mastodon's "No Nazis", but I am not sure it is either specific, nor general enough.Please help. Does your group have something-like this? What have I missed, and, in the interests of sanity, what has been double-defined?
---
17. Membership hurdles.
17.1 The association insists on the following psychological characteristics and standards of behaviour from all members.
17.2 No member will be accepted, and existing members will be expelled if they fail any of these hurdles.
17.3 The psychological characteristics. Members must not be:
i. psychopaths,
ii. sociopaths,
iii. narcissists,
iv. liars,
v. egomaniacs.
17.4 The standards of behaviour. Members must never indulge in :
i. crime,
ii. racism,
iii. misogyny,
iv. criticism of person,
v. aggression, threats, shaming,
vi. coercive control,
vii.prejudice, bigotry.
17.5 The association explicitly rejects the notion that a person’s ability can replace or diminish their need to clear these hurdles. The most able and talented member will be expelled if they fail.#rules #DarkTriad #constitution #legalese #IANAL #arseholes #governance
-
CW: Too boring for words.
I am drafting a "rules of association". It is partly an exercise, and partly an guess at of something that may become real.
Starting with the standard rules for an "unincorporated association": (https://www.acnc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/download_template_rules_for_unincorporated_associations_with_notes_pdf_639kb_.pdf)
But I am tired of organisations infiltrated by arseholes, and I wonder if it is possible to put standards of behaviour front and centre.
I am inspired by Mastodon's "No Nazis", but I am not sure it is either specific, nor general enough.Please help. Does your group have something-like this? What have I missed, and, in the interests of sanity, what has been double-defined?
---
17. Membership hurdles.
17.1 The association insists on the following psychological characteristics and standards of behaviour from all members.
17.2 No member will be accepted, and existing members will be expelled if they fail any of these hurdles.
17.3 The psychological characteristics. Members must not be:
i. psychopaths,
ii. sociopaths,
iii. narcissists,
iv. liars,
v. egomaniacs.
17.4 The standards of behaviour. Members must never indulge in :
i. crime,
ii. racism,
iii. misogyny,
iv. criticism of person,
v. aggression, threats, shaming,
vi. coercive control,
vii.prejudice, bigotry.
17.5 The association explicitly rejects the notion that a person’s ability can replace or diminish their need to clear these hurdles. The most able and talented member will be expelled if they fail.#rules #DarkTriad #constitution #legalese #IANAL #arseholes #governance
-
CW: Too boring for words.
I am drafting a "rules of association". It is partly an exercise, and partly an guess at of something that may become real.
Starting with the standard rules for an "unincorporated association": (https://www.acnc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/download_template_rules_for_unincorporated_associations_with_notes_pdf_639kb_.pdf)
But I am tired of organisations infiltrated by arseholes, and I wonder if it is possible to put standards of behaviour front and centre.
I am inspired by Mastodon's "No Nazis", but I am not sure it is either specific, nor general enough.Please help. Does your group have something-like this? What have I missed, and, in the interests of sanity, what has been double-defined?
---
17. Membership hurdles.
17.1 The association insists on the following psychological characteristics and standards of behaviour from all members.
17.2 No member will be accepted, and existing members will be expelled if they fail any of these hurdles.
17.3 The psychological characteristics. Members must not be:
i. psychopaths,
ii. sociopaths,
iii. narcissists,
iv. liars,
v. egomaniacs.
17.4 The standards of behaviour. Members must never indulge in :
i. crime,
ii. racism,
iii. misogyny,
iv. criticism of person,
v. aggression, threats, shaming,
vi. coercive control,
vii.prejudice, bigotry.
17.5 The association explicitly rejects the notion that a person’s ability can replace or diminish their need to clear these hurdles. The most able and talented member will be expelled if they fail.#rules #DarkTriad #constitution #legalese #IANAL #arseholes #governance
-
CW: Too boring for words.
I am drafting a "rules of association". It is partly an exercise, and partly an guess at of something that may become real.
Starting with the standard rules for an "unincorporated association": (https://www.acnc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021-07/download_template_rules_for_unincorporated_associations_with_notes_pdf_639kb_.pdf)
But I am tired of organisations infiltrated by arseholes, and I wonder if it is possible to put standards of behaviour front and centre.
I am inspired by Mastodon's "No Nazis", but I am not sure it is either specific, nor general enough.Please help. Does your group have something-like this? What have I missed, and, in the interests of sanity, what has been double-defined?
---
17. Membership hurdles.
17.1 The association insists on the following psychological characteristics and standards of behaviour from all members.
17.2 No member will be accepted, and existing members will be expelled if they fail any of these hurdles.
17.3 The psychological characteristics. Members must not be:
i. psychopaths,
ii. sociopaths,
iii. narcissists,
iv. liars,
v. egomaniacs.
17.4 The standards of behaviour. Members must never indulge in :
i. crime,
ii. racism,
iii. misogyny,
iv. criticism of person,
v. aggression, threats, shaming,
vi. coercive control,
vii.prejudice, bigotry.
17.5 The association explicitly rejects the notion that a person’s ability can replace or diminish their need to clear these hurdles. The most able and talented member will be expelled if they fail.#rules #DarkTriad #constitution #legalese #IANAL #arseholes #governance
-
[P] World War III will arrive Sooner Than Expected™, and that'll be all she wrote. There's no stopping this, and there're too few neurodivergents to make an impact. So, pull up a chair and grab your refreshments of choice, I suppose. The best advice I can give is to imbibe and be merry, because the weird bloody antiquity tree from Flight of Dragons was right—these were and are our closing decades. I can't say it's been fun. It hasn't.
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-7
-
[P] World War III is inevitable because neurotypical nature is what it is. And with the size of typie group-selves having reached such ludicrous levels? We're at terminal velocity. This is why it feels like everything is descending into awfulness so quickly—it is. And though birth-rates have slowed a little? They're still increasing, which will only further qggravate overshoot and drive neurotypicals deeper into the Dark Triad.
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-6
-
[P] There is a comorbid factor—an equation that states that as a typie's group-self size grows, it accelerates the group-self into stronger Dark Triad traits. Hence why the most harmless tribes were smaller ones, and they were victimised by much larger tribes (colonials). As the world's population balloons into absurd overshoot, the acceleration of typie group-selves into Dark Triad traits increases exponentially too.
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-5
-
[P] Collapse is imminent as our typie friends embrace the Dark Triad. If I were a bloody conspiracy theorist, I'd say overstumulating entertainment and social media was fashioned to make them this way. But ir doesn't brhoove one to attribute to malice what can instead be attributed to nature and evolution. I hold that this was inevitable as typies found themselves in ever bigger tribes—I hold that what changed is scale.
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-4
-
[P] The problem is is that not enough minds know to look at this as the group-self—the hive, the tribe—as opposed to only the personal-self. If the group-self is considered, typies are rising in Dark Triad scales at an exponential rate. And while only impatience and the need for hyper-stimulation can be measured in the personal-self, neurotypicals don't exist solely as the personal-self. So, this is a warning to heed...
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-3
-
[P] So! It looks like typie aggression is on the rise while empathy for dissimilarity and otherness is bottoming out. This, coupled with a hunger for excessive stimulation and an impatient hatred for boredom. In other words, typie group-selves are starting to look very ASPD. It really drives home how the Dark Triad is such a highly neurotypical set of pathologies. The only distinction is that it exhibits in the personal-self.
#psychology #actuallyautistic #neurotypicals #darktriad
-2