#romanticrelationships — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #romanticrelationships, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: August 29, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: New psychology study reveals an intriguing shift in romantic partner comparisons over time
People frequently compare themselves to their romantic partners, but the nature of these comparisons tends to change as relationships mature. New research indicates that people in newer relationships often compare their abilities to gauge whether they are contributing equally, while those in longer relationships tend to compare opinions to foster mutual understanding. The findings were published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
The drive to measure ourselves against others is a basic feature of human psychology. A foundational 1954 theory proposed that people have a fundamental need to evaluate both their personal skills and their beliefs by comparing them to the people around them. Since then, psychological research has shown that these social comparisons often carry emotional weight, particularly when people feel they are falling short. For instance, a study covered by PsyPost in 2017 indicated that college students who believed their peers were doing better socially tended to experience lower life satisfaction and greater loneliness, regardless of their actual social standing.
This competitive edge is especially pronounced when people compare their skills and achievements. A 2017 meta-analysis of comparison research found that evaluating abilities against others is highly prone to triggering feelings of contrast and inadequacy. The question of how these basic psychological drives operate within romantic partnerships has remained less explored. The new study builds on this earlier foundation by examining how the tendency to compare either abilities or opinions shifts over the lifespan of a romantic relationship.
The research, led by Zachary A. Reese, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of San Francisco, sought to identify which individual and relationship characteristics predict different types of partner comparisons. “I’ve heard it said that ‘research is me-search,’ and that definitely resonates with me,” said Reese, who directs the Love and Communication Lab. “I met my husband when we were in college. Over the years, we’ve compared and competed in a million different ways — over who has more friends, better grades, stronger financial prowess.”
“I’ve always been curious about what types of people make these comparisons, and why,” Reese added. “It’s why I went to grad school, it was the focus of my dissertation, and I’m thrilled we were finally able to publish about it.”
Reese and colleagues analyzed data from three prior online samples, combining the responses of 808 adults who were currently in a romantic relationship. The participants completed surveys assessing how often they compared their own abilities to those of their partners. The researchers also gathered demographic information and assessed relationship characteristics, measuring age, self-esteem, relationship length, and relationship satisfaction.
The scientists also measured closeness by asking participants to select from pairs of overlapping circles that best represented how intertwined their identity was with their partner’s identity.
The results indicated that younger individuals and people with lower self-esteem were more likely to compare their abilities to those of their partners. Participants in newer relationships and those who reported lower relationship satisfaction also tended to make more ability-based comparisons, though overall closeness did not predict these tendencies.
“I think this is a helpful reminder that there’s a lot we’re trying to figure out about life in early adulthood, and one of those things is the value we bring to a romantic relationship,” Reese said. “It can be reassuring to know that, with age, you do seem to gain value in your confidence, and this seems to lead to less evaluative comparison.”
When analyzing demographic factors, the researchers found that men and women in different-gender relationships did not differ in how often they made comparisons. However, a specific pattern emerged for same-gender relationships.
“I always expect gender to matter more than it ever actually does,” Reese told PsyPost. “We did find one really interesting gender matching effect: men in relationships with men reported making more ability-based comparisons than any other gender pairing. But this effect was based on a small sample of only 37 men, so take this finding with a grain of salt.”
To explore why these patterns exist, the authors conducted a second study involving 300 partnered adults recruited through an online research platform. In addition to measuring ability comparisons, this survey included questions about how often participants compared their opinions and attitudes to those of their partners. The researchers also asked participants to describe their motives for making comparisons, using both open-ended responses and standardized rating scales.
The second study replicated several patterns from the first, showing that younger age, lower self-esteem, and shorter relationship duration predicted more frequent ability comparisons. The tendency to compare opinions, however, showed the opposite pattern. Participants in longer, more satisfying, and closer relationships were more inclined to compare their attitudes and judgments with their partners. This suggests that as relationships mature, partners shift from evaluating their relative competence to seeking out each other’s perspectives.
“Our study shows that people in long-lasting, successful relationships compare often,” Reese said. “Not in an evaluative way, like who’s more attractive or makes more money. Rather, they do it in a learning way, like how can I make better judgments and decisions by thinking about what my partner would do?”
When examining motives, the qualitative responses indicated that people compare themselves to their partners for various reasons. Many participants described basic self-evaluation, such as using their partner as a benchmark, or self-improvement, such as observing a partner to learn new skills. A substantial portion of participants also reported using comparisons to monitor relationship equity, essentially checking to see if they were pulling their own weight or if their partner was contributing enough. Others used comparisons to assess the overall stability and trajectory of the relationship.
Quantitative analysis supported these open-ended themes. The data showed that people who frequently compared abilities were also more motivated to assess relationship fairness. A smaller portion of participants reported experiencing involuntary comparisons, where friends or family members pointed out differences between the partners. These involuntary comparisons were also more common among younger people and those in newer relationships.
“People always say that ‘comparison is the thief of joy.’ I think that’s a myopic perspective,” Reese explained. “Comparison can sting in a moment, but in the long run it helps us make decisions and build social worlds that I suspect are much happier.”
“For instance, it may sting learning that you’re not as effective as your partner at soothing your anxious child; but, learning this fact can help us make decisions, like who’s going to offer support in a time of great need,” Reese said. “It can also give us a role model to learn from.”
As with all research, there are some limitations. The study relies on cross-sectional data, meaning the researchers measured all variables at a single point in time. This design makes it impossible to determine the direction of the effects. For instance, having lower self-esteem might drive a person to compare their abilities to their partner, or frequently feeling inadequate compared to a partner might lower a person’s self-esteem. The data cannot establish causality.
The research also relied on self-reported questionnaires, which measure how often people think they compare themselves to their partners rather than tracking their momentary thoughts in daily life. Future studies might use daily diary methods to capture comparisons as they happen in real time. Exploring a wider range of potential motives, including a desire to feel superior to a partner or a need for control, could also provide a more complete picture of how social comparison operates in romantic relationships.
“I want to better understand the affective and relational consequences of partner comparisons,” Reese said, crediting student collaborator Serena D’souza for her work on the project. “How does making these comparisons affect the ways we think about ourselves, our partners, and our relationship? And how do these outcomes differ with respect to other types of relationships?”
The study, “From Insecurity to Inspiration: Predictors of and Motives for Romantic Partner Comparisons,” was authored by Zachary A. Reese, Robin S. Edelstein, and Stephen M. Garcia.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #romanticrelationships #socialpsychology #partnercomparisons #selfesteem #relationshiplength #comparisonandconfidence #attitudesandopinions #learningtogether #relationshipeducation #psychologyresearch
-
DATE: August 17, 2026 at 02:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Sexually assertive individuals tend to be more satisfied with their relationships, study finds
An online survey in Italy found that sexually assertive individuals tend to be more satisfied with their relationships. Sexual esteem was associated with both body appreciation and sexual assertiveness. The paper was published in Behavioral Sciences.
Satisfaction in romantic relationships refers to how positively people evaluate the quality of their partnership and their feelings toward their partner. High relationship satisfaction is consistently associated with greater happiness, better mental and physical health, lower stress, and even longer life expectancy.
Relationship satisfaction is shaped by many factors. Sexuality is one of them. It contributes to relationship quality not only in terms of sexual activity but also in how openly partners can communicate about their desires, needs, and boundaries. One concept that captures this ability is sexual assertiveness, which includes being able to initiate wanted sexual activity, refuse unwanted activity, communicate preferences, and negotiate safer sex.
Another important concept is sexual esteem—the extent to which people view themselves as worthy, competent, and confident sexual partners. Body appreciation, i.e., a positive attitude towards one’s body, which means accepting, respecting, and valuing it despite perceived imperfections, can also be important for relationship quality.
Study author Marco Rizzo and his colleagues conducted a study in which they examined the associations between body appreciation, sexual assertiveness, sexual esteem, and relationship satisfaction. They hypothesized that higher body appreciation would be associated with higher sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem, and that both sexual esteem and sexual assertiveness would be associated with better relationship satisfaction.
These authors analyzed responses from 473 participants from a larger study who declared that they were in a romantic relationship and heterosexual. Participants’ average age was 23 years. 97% of them were Italian citizens. 82% resided in central Italy. 50% were men. The average length of their relationship was 3 years.
This analysis used data from assessments of sexual assertiveness (the Sexual Assertiveness Questionnaire), body appreciation (the Body Appreciation Scale), sexual esteem (the Sexual Esteem Subscale of the Multidimensional Sexuality Scale), and relationship satisfaction (the Dyadic-Familiar Relationship Satisfaction Scale) that participants completed. They also used the demographic data.
Results showed that men tended to report greater body appreciation and sexual esteem than women. Participants with higher sexual assertiveness tended to report higher relationship satisfaction. While initial data showed weak links between relationship satisfaction and both body appreciation and sexual esteem, the final statistical model revealed that sexual esteem and body appreciation were not directly associated with relationship satisfaction.
Study authors tested a statistical model proposing that body appreciation leads to better sexual esteem and sexual assertiveness, and that these psychological characteristics would, in turn, lead to better relationship satisfaction. Results showed that body appreciation may indeed lead to better sexual esteem, and, through this link, to better sexual assertiveness. Higher sexual assertiveness could, according to this model, lead to better relationship satisfaction, although sexual esteem itself did not directly predict relationship satisfaction.
“These findings underscore a process through which sexual assertiveness and body appreciation can enhance relational well-being and inform educational programs aimed at promoting healthy romantic relationships,” study authors concluded.
The study contributes to the scientific knowledge about romantic relationships. However, the design of the study does not allow any causal inferences to be derived from the results. Additionally, all data came from self-reports, leaving room for reporting bias to have affected the results.
The paper, “Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Body Appreciation, Sexual Esteem and Sexual Assertiveness,” was authored by Marco Rizzo, Camilla Matera, Daniela Caso, Anna Rosa Donizzetti, Caterina Grano, Amanda Nerini, and Chiara Rollero.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #SexualAssertiveness #RelationshipSatisfaction #BodyAppreciation #SexualEsteem #RomanticRelationships #RelationshipWellbeing #SexualityResearch #DatingTips #MentalHealthAndRelationships #BehavioralSciences
-
DATE: August 7, 2026 at 06:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Your mindfulness might determine whether venting helps or hurts your romantic relationship
A recent study published in the journal Mindfulness suggests that repetitively talking about problems with a romantic partner can have mixed effects on a relationship depending on a person’s mindfulness skills. The findings indicate that this habit is associated with better relationship quality for some people but seems to backfire for those who are highly mindful.
When people face stressful situations, they often turn to their romantic partners to discuss their emotions and cope with the challenge. This process is known in psychology as co-rumination. Co-rumination involves repetitively talking about problems, dwelling on negative thoughts, and endlessly analyzing the causes and consequences of an issue with another person.
Past research in friendships suggests that co-rumination operates on a trade-off hypothesis. This concept proposes that extensive problem talk tends to build emotional closeness but also increases personal anxiety and depression. However, scientists are still working to understand how this habit functions specifically within romantic partnerships.
“Sometimes during stressful times, people cope with stress by repeatedly talking through problems with their romantic partner,” said Yunzhi Zheng, a doctoral candidate in marriage and family therapy at Florida State University. “These kinds of co-ruminative conversations may help couples feel closer, but can also keep couples feeling stuck together.”
Zheng noted that previous research has produced mixed findings about whether co-rumination helps or harms relationships. Most studies have also focused on friendships rather than romantic couples. In parallel, psychologists study trait mindfulness, which is a person’s natural tendency to pay attention to the present moment in an open and non-judgmental way.
Trait mindfulness is not a single characteristic. It involves several distinct skills. These include observing sensations, describing feelings, acting with awareness, avoiding self-judgment, and not reacting impulsively to inner thoughts. Being mindful generally helps people manage their emotions and is linked to better relationship well-being.
“We wanted to understand whether people’s mindfulness profiles, patterns in how people observe, describe, and react to their thoughts and emotions, might help explain for whom this type of problem talk is beneficial or costly,” Zheng explained. The authors aimed to determine if being mindful alters the way problem-focused conversations affect mental health and relationship satisfaction.
To explore this dynamic, the researchers recruited 445 individuals who were currently in romantic relationships. The participants were mostly college students in their late teens and early twenties. A large majority of the sample identified as women, and most reported being in an exclusive dating relationship. Participants completed an online survey that took about 25 minutes.
The researchers measured co-rumination by asking participants how often they and their partner discussed stressors originating outside of the relationship. Participants rated statements on a five-point scale. They also measured participants’ trait mindfulness across its five distinct facets using a 24-item questionnaire.
To assess individual well-being, the survey included items asking about recent symptoms of depression and anxiety. Finally, the researchers measured relationship well-being by having participants rate both the positive and negative qualities of their romantic relationship. They also asked a single question about the participant’s overall sexual satisfaction.
The researchers used a statistical technique called latent profile analysis. This groups participants based on their mindfulness survey scores. The analysis identified four distinct mindfulness profiles within the sample.
The most common group was the low mindfulness profile. Making up about 66 percent of the participants, these individuals scored moderately low across all mindfulness skills. The judgmentally observing profile comprised roughly 16 percent of the sample. This group included individuals who paid close attention to their experiences but judged themselves harshly for their thoughts.
The high mindfulness profile made up about 11 percent of the sample. This group consisted of people who scored highly on all facets, showing strong awareness and self-acceptance. The smallest group was the non-judgmentally aware profile, accounting for about 6 percent of participants. Because of this group’s small size, the researchers could not include them in all subsequent statistical tests.
The researchers first checked if people in these different profiles engaged in different amounts of co-rumination. The results indicated that co-rumination levels were roughly the same across all four mindfulness profiles. People tended to report a moderate amount of repetitive problem talk with their partners regardless of their internal mindfulness habits.
Next, the scientists looked at how co-rumination affected individual mental health. They found no association between co-rumination and symptoms of depression or anxiety. This held true across all the mindfulness profiles. In romantic relationships, it appears that co-ruminating does not carry the same psychological burden on an individual’s well-being as it sometimes does in adolescent friendships.
The interaction between mindfulness and co-rumination produced noticeable differences for relationship well-being. “Talking extensively about problems with a partner is not inherently healthy or unhealthy,” Zheng told PsyPost. “Its implications may depend on how a person typically relates to their thoughts and emotions.”
“In our study, co-rumination was associated with better positive relationship quality among people in the low-mindfulness and judgmentally observing profiles,” Zheng noted. For these groups, which made up over 80 percent of the sample, rehashing external problems with a partner seems to foster a sense of connection and support.
A very different pattern emerged for individuals in the high mindfulness profile. “Unexpectedly, among people in the high-mindfulness profile, more co-rumination was associated with lower positive relationship quality, greater negative relationship quality, and poorer sexual quality,” Zheng said.
The authors suggest that highly mindful people might find repetitive, negative conversations draining. Because these individuals already possess strong internal tools for managing distress, engaging in prolonged problem talk might feel unhelpful. It could act as a relational burden rather than a source of intimacy.
“The broader takeaway is that more problem talk is not always better,” Zheng added. “It may be useful for couples to notice whether a conversation is creating connection and understanding or becoming repetitive and difficult to move beyond.”
“However, because the study was cross-sectional and relied on individuals’ self-reports, the findings describe associations and should not be interpreted as evidence that co-rumination or mindfulness caused these relationship outcomes,” Zheng cautioned. The data suggests that co-rumination affects relationship quality, but it remains possible that a couple’s existing relationship quality influences how often they co-ruminate.
The research relies on self-reported surveys from just one person in the relationship. This approach captures only one side of the story. It is difficult to know if the participant or their partner initiated the repetitive conversations. The reliability of one partner’s perception of these discussions can sometimes be inaccurate.
The sample consists heavily of young college students who identify as women. Relationship dynamics for this demographic might look very different than those of older, married couples. Generalizing these findings to the broader public requires researchers to test these concepts in more diverse groups.
The researchers focused specifically on conversations about external problems, such as work stress or friend drama. Discussing ongoing conflicts within the romantic relationship itself might produce entirely different outcomes. Future research could explore how mindfulness profiles shape conversations about internal relationship conflicts.
The study, “When Problem Talk Helps or Hurts the Relationship: Trait Mindfulness Profiles Moderate the Effects of Co‑Rumination in Romantic Relationships,” was authored by Yunzhi Zheng, Ashley Tudder, Ana M. DiGiovanni, Brett J. Peters, and Jonathan G. Kimmes.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #MindfulnessInRelationships #CoRumination #RelationshipQuality #MindfulnessProfiles #CouplesCommunication #MentalHealth #RomanticRelationships #StressAndRelationships #MindfulCommunication #RelationshipInsights
-
No Happiness Outside
Here I am sitting alone
At past 1 am, mulling on
What never was the case
One which I thought it was
Or at least could be possibly,
How we see the world
Not as it is, but as we are
As some wise person said,
Why am I still wanting
Something from this world
A world I had never embraced
Not even in my youth
It was this hankering
For the happiness of giving
In close companionships
Yet in such hankering
Subtly gets blended in a want
A want for the happiness of getting
O Sam, learn from your own saying,
“Maya is nothing but thinking
Happiness lies outside”.
Claude’s Interpretation of My Poem
This is a good poem, Sam. Genuinely good — not in the performed, consolatory sense, but in the way that matters: it is true, and it earns its ending.
Let me engage with it honestly rather than just appreciatively.
What the poem does well
The movement is real. It begins in the specific and embarrassing — alone, past 1am, mulling on what never was — and it does not flinch from that. “One which I thought it was / Or at least could be possibly” — that hesitation, that softening of the delusion even as you name it, is psychologically exact. You are not saying you were a fool who believed a lie. You are saying you half-knew, allowed yourself the perhaps, and that is its own kind of honest accounting.
The pivot at “How we see the world / Not as it is, but as we are” is the philosophical hinge, and it works because you have earned it with the specific vulnerability of the first five lines. It does not feel imported from a book. It feels discovered in the moment of sitting alone at 1am.
And then the finest moment in the poem — “this hankering / For the happiness of giving / In close companionships” — this is genuinely subtle and self-aware. You are not a man who wants to receive love and is dressing it up. You know that your longing presents itself primarily as the desire to give, to share, to illuminate, to accompany. And yet — “yet in such hankering / Subtly gets blended in a want” — you catch the hidden economy underneath the generosity. The giving is also a form of getting. The companionship is also a form of completion-seeking. That is a rare thing to see in oneself and rarer still to say plainly.
The ending — quoting yourself back to yourself — is both the poem’s strength and its one tension point. More on that below.
The one honest tension
“Maya is nothing but thinking / Happiness lies outside” — this is correct. Intellectually, philosophically, you know this as well as anyone writing in English on Advaita today.
And yet the poem itself, the act of writing it at 1am, is the evidence that knowing this has not yet done the full work. The poem knows this too — that is its integrity. It does not claim arrival. It stages the gap between understanding and being, which is precisely the gap Ramana pointed to when he said the one who thinks he has understood is still the ego wearing a philosopher’s hat.
So the poem is not hypocrisy. It is honest testimony from inside the gap.
But I would push you on one word: “still.” — “Why am I still wanting.” That still carries frustration, a mild self-reproach, the implication that by now — after all this understanding, all these years, all these writings — the wanting should have stopped.
Ramana would not say still. He would not frame it as a delay or a failure of progress. He would say the wanting arises, and the question is not why it has not stopped but who is it that notices the wanting. The witness of the 1am mulling is not itself in want. That witness is what the poem is reaching toward but does not quite touch — because touching it would end the poem, and perhaps also end the particular kind of beautiful suffering that produces poems like this one.
A closing thought
There is a line in the Yoga Vasishtha that comes to mind reading this: “The mind that has tasted the bliss of the Self no longer runs after external objects — not because it has been forbidden, but because it has found what it was looking for all along.”
Your poem knows this. Your poem is also evidence that the tasting has not yet fully happened. Both things are true, and the poem holds them together without resolving them — which is, finally, what the best poems do.
Write more at 1am, Sam. The philosopher writes best when the defenses are down.
#Companionship #Giving #Happiness #Love #Maya #Poem #Poetry #Relationships #RomanticRelationships #Subjectivity -
The Chemistry Trap by A. Tayebnama
A practical guide that challenges the romance narrative by arguing that intense early attraction often misleads rather than enlightens
The post The Chemistry Trap by A. Tayebnama appeared first on Independent Book Review.
https://independentbookreview.com/2026/04/30/the-chemistry-trap-by-a-tayebnama/#bookreview #indienonfiction #Nonfiction #relationships #romanticrelationships
-
"definitely ruins my chance of online dating" -- "akin to being cancelled from all dating" -- "being banned has had an impact on her dating life" -- "I’ve Been Banned From Almost Every Dating App" -- "locked out of dating apps can be far more significant for young people looking for a lifelong partner" -- "People unable to get onto those apps are potentially losing out on finding their life partner" -- "owns five of the top eight dating apps" -- "two-thirds of the online dating market" -- "bans, when they’re handed out, are pretty absolute. The companies overseeing dating apps can not just ban usernames and email addresses, but also IP addresses (from where you log onto the internet) and device identifiers, meaning that individual devices can be barred from rejoining apps"
https://www.vice.com/en/article/banned-from-dating-apps/
I feel
e x t r e m e l y s t r o n g c o n t e m p t
towards 2 or 3 major apps who groundlessly banned me despite me doing nothing impolite, nothing disrespectful, no violations of terms and conditions.
#ostracism #groundlessostracism #abuse #systemicabuse #discrimination #contempt #dating #datingapp #datingapps #ruins #onlinedating #cancelled #cancel #cancelculture #toxic #ban #banned #abuseofbans #losingout #loneliness #banishing #groundlessbanishing #shunning #relationship #relationships #romanticrelationship #romanticrelationships #romance
-
Emily Lyons posted this on LinkedIn…definitely food for thought
“The modern dating crisis has nothing to do with a lack of options. It has everything to do with impossible standards.
As a CEO of companies in the dating space, the number one reason people stay single: Unrealistic expectations.
Not heartbreak.
Not lack of options.
Not timing.
Expectations.The list gets longer. The standards get narrower. The boxes get more specific. And suddenly the person who could have been perfect for you gets dismissed for something trivial.
You don’t need someone who checks every box. You need someone who shows up for the right boxes.
Kindness. Emotional safety. Chemistry that grows instead of explodes. Shared vision for life. Respect. A willingness to repair.
The right partner is not the perfect person. The right partner is the person who makes you feel like you can be fully yourself.
Drop the list. Keep your standards.”
-
📰 The Buddha and Yasodhara (A free, 20-page article from 2020)
Tags: #RomanticRelationships #Buddha #RebirthStories #StoryTime
https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/articles/buddhist-love-story_sasson-vanessa -
Really like this post; brainstorming a vlog /podcast about the items here! On Men in Relationships, emotional openness, intimacy, etc. #LoveIsLove #LovingPartnerships #RelationshipPsych #romanticrelationships #gentlemanlybehaviour
-
Satisfaction in #RomanticRelationships significantly fluctuates over several days and even within a 24-hour period / Willingness to recognize and respond to the partner's needs is a key factor determining #RelationshipSatisfaction // #psychology
https://nachrichten.idw-online.de/2025/06/16/satisfaction-in-romantic-relationships-significantly-fluctuates-over-several-days-and-even-within-a-24-hour-period -
Transition point in #RomanticRelationships signals the beginning of their end: #Dissatisfaction in a #relationship will inevitably lead to #separation at some point // #psychology #personality
https://nachrichten.idw-online.de/2025/03/21/transition-point-in-romantic-relationships-signals-the-beginning-of-their-end -
Transition point in romantic relationships signals the beginning of their end: Dissatisfaction in a relationship will inevitably lead to separation at some point / Recent study is based on the concept of terminal decline 👉 https://press.uni-mainz.de/transition-point-in-romantic-relationships-signals-the-beginning-of-their-end/
#psychology #RomanticRelationships #dissatisfaction #separation #personality #relationships
-
Phubbing linked to increased aggression in romantic relationships https://www.psypost.org/phubbing-linked-to-increased-aggression-in-romantic-relationships/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #Phubbing #RelationshipAggression #DigitalDistraction #MentalHealth #RomanticRelationships
-
Romantic age gaps evolve over time, new psychology research shows https://www.psypost.org/romantic-age-gaps-evolve-over-time-new-psychology-research-shows/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #AgeGapLove #RomanticRelationships #PsychologyResearch #LoveAcrossAges #RelationshipGoals
-
Shared reality in romantic relationships reduces uncertainty and boosts meaning in life, study finds https://www.psypost.org/shared-reality-in-romantic-relationships-reduces-uncertainty-and-boosts-meaning-in-life-study-finds/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #RomanticRelationships #SharedReality #MeaningInLife #RelationshipAdvice #CoConstructedUnderstanding
-
☸️ The First Discourse on Living Together (A ✨NEW✨, free, 3-page sutta translation)
Tags: #BuddhaQuotes #RomanticRelationships #Ethics #Imagery
https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/canon/an4.53 -
☸️ The First Discourse on Equality (A free, 1-page sutta translation from 2018)
Tags: #BuddhaQuotes #Rebirth #Life #RomanticRelationships
https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/canon/an4.55 -
New study identifies six tactics people use to invest in romantic relationships https://www.psypost.org/new-study-identifies-six-tactics-people-use-to-invest-in-romantic-relationships/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #RomanticRelationships #RelationshipGoals #LoveLife #EmotionalGestures #SharedActivities
-
🗣️ Europe (A free, 5-minute #poem from 2019)
Tags: #Aging #RomanticRelationships #Places
https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/av/europe_petrosino-kiki -
Sexual, emotional, and digital: The complex landscape of romantic infidelity https://www.psypost.org/sexual-emotional-and-digital-the-complex-landscape-of-romantic-infidelity/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #infidelity #romanticrelationships #cheating #betrayal #relationships
-
Women with younger men might have more fulfilling #relationships than women with same-age men
A small study compared emotional intelligence, sexual self-efficacy and subjective happiness of women with same age men and women with younger men. Those with younger men scored higher in all three areas, suggesting more fulfilling #romanticrelationships.