home.social

#microtargeting — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #microtargeting, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Research shows social media advertising suppresses voting in targeted communities. “Messages intended to suppress votes can be precisely delivered to particularly vulnerable and consequential groups of people via social media and keep millions of them from casting ballots, according to a new study that is the first to quantify the effect of this kind of […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/24/university-of-wisconsin-madison-research-shows-social-media-advertising-suppresses-voting-in-targeted-communities/
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Research shows social media advertising suppresses voting in targeted communities. “Messages intended to suppress votes can be precisely delivered to particularly vulnerable and consequential groups of people via social media and keep millions of them from casting ballots, according to a new study that is the first to quantify the effect of this kind of […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/24/university-of-wisconsin-madison-research-shows-social-media-advertising-suppresses-voting-in-targeted-communities/
  3. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Research shows social media advertising suppresses voting in targeted communities. “Messages intended to suppress votes can be precisely delivered to particularly vulnerable and consequential groups of people via social media and keep millions of them from casting ballots, according to a new study that is the first to quantify the effect of this kind of […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/24/university-of-wisconsin-madison-research-shows-social-media-advertising-suppresses-voting-in-targeted-communities/
  4. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Research shows social media advertising suppresses voting in targeted communities. “Messages intended to suppress votes can be precisely delivered to particularly vulnerable and consequential groups of people via social media and keep millions of them from casting ballots, according to a new study that is the first to quantify the effect of this kind of […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/24/university-of-wisconsin-madison-research-shows-social-media-advertising-suppresses-voting-in-targeted-communities/
  5. @RAlpenstern

    „Unverständnis“ & vor allem „Abscheu“ trifft es gut, da die #Zerblasung gezielt konstruktiven #Dialog durch emotionalen Freund - Feind - #Dualismus ersetzt.

    Angesichts des schon „alten“ #Microtargeting & der gezielten, medialen Befeuerung von Konflikten durch #Putin - Trolle gehe ich jedoch fast davon aus, dass die mehrdimensionale #Spaltung der Gesellschaften hin zu einer fossilen #Zerblasung im #Fossilismus gewollt ist. Vgl.: youtu.be/F1nITBjZUAM

  6. @RAlpenstern

    „Unverständnis“ & vor allem „Abscheu“ trifft es gut, da die #Zerblasung gezielt konstruktiven #Dialog durch emotionalen Freund - Feind - #Dualismus ersetzt.

    Angesichts des schon „alten“ #Microtargeting & der gezielten, medialen Befeuerung von Konflikten durch #Putin - Trolle gehe ich jedoch fast davon aus, dass die mehrdimensionale #Spaltung der Gesellschaften hin zu einer fossilen #Zerblasung im #Fossilismus gewollt ist. Vgl.: youtu.be/F1nITBjZUAM

  7. @RAlpenstern

    „Unverständnis“ & vor allem „Abscheu“ trifft es gut, da die #Zerblasung gezielt konstruktiven #Dialog durch emotionalen Freund - Feind - #Dualismus ersetzt.

    Angesichts des schon „alten“ #Microtargeting & der gezielten, medialen Befeuerung von Konflikten durch #Putin - Trolle gehe ich jedoch fast davon aus, dass die mehrdimensionale #Spaltung der Gesellschaften hin zu einer fossilen #Zerblasung im #Fossilismus gewollt ist. Vgl.: youtu.be/F1nITBjZUAM

  8. @RAlpenstern

    „Unverständnis“ & vor allem „Abscheu“ trifft es gut, da die #Zerblasung gezielt konstruktiven #Dialog durch emotionalen Freund - Feind - #Dualismus ersetzt.

    Angesichts des schon „alten“ #Microtargeting & der gezielten, medialen Befeuerung von Konflikten durch #Putin - Trolle gehe ich jedoch fast davon aus, dass die mehrdimensionale #Spaltung der Gesellschaften hin zu einer fossilen #Zerblasung im #Fossilismus gewollt ist. Vgl.: youtu.be/F1nITBjZUAM

  9. @RAlpenstern

    „Unverständnis“ & vor allem „Abscheu“ trifft es gut, da die #Zerblasung gezielt konstruktiven #Dialog durch emotionalen Freund - Feind - #Dualismus ersetzt.

    Angesichts des schon „alten“ #Microtargeting & der gezielten, medialen Befeuerung von Konflikten durch #Putin - Trolle gehe ich jedoch fast davon aus, dass die mehrdimensionale #Spaltung der Gesellschaften hin zu einer fossilen #Zerblasung im #Fossilismus gewollt ist. Vgl.: youtu.be/F1nITBjZUAM

  10. De promotie van geweld tegen vrouwen en sexueel misbruik door #Meta.

    Laatst had ik nog een discussie over het gevaar van het delen van privegegevens op #socialemedia en met #chatbots. Dat #microtargeting een enorme invloed zal hebben op hoe de wereld door de slachtoffers wordt gezien. Bijna zonder uitzondering wordt mij te kennen gegeven dat ik overdrijf, dat er wat met mij aan de hand is, dat ik mij zoveel zorgen maak.
    theguardian.com/technology/202

  11. De promotie van geweld tegen vrouwen en sexueel misbruik door #Meta.

    Laatst had ik nog een discussie over het gevaar van het delen van privegegevens op #socialemedia en met #chatbots. Dat #microtargeting een enorme invloed zal hebben op hoe de wereld door de slachtoffers wordt gezien. Bijna zonder uitzondering wordt mij te kennen gegeven dat ik overdrijf, dat er wat met mij aan de hand is, dat ik mij zoveel zorgen maak.
    theguardian.com/technology/202

  12. De promotie van geweld tegen vrouwen en sexueel misbruik door #Meta.

    Laatst had ik nog een discussie over het gevaar van het delen van privegegevens op #socialemedia en met #chatbots. Dat #microtargeting een enorme invloed zal hebben op hoe de wereld door de slachtoffers wordt gezien. Bijna zonder uitzondering wordt mij te kennen gegeven dat ik overdrijf, dat er wat met mij aan de hand is, dat ik mij zoveel zorgen maak.
    theguardian.com/technology/202

  13. De promotie van geweld tegen vrouwen en sexueel misbruik door #Meta.

    Laatst had ik nog een discussie over het gevaar van het delen van privegegevens op #socialemedia en met #chatbots. Dat #microtargeting een enorme invloed zal hebben op hoe de wereld door de slachtoffers wordt gezien. Bijna zonder uitzondering wordt mij te kennen gegeven dat ik overdrijf, dat er wat met mij aan de hand is, dat ik mij zoveel zorgen maak.
    theguardian.com/technology/202

  14. De promotie van geweld tegen vrouwen en sexueel misbruik door #Meta.

    Laatst had ik nog een discussie over het gevaar van het delen van privegegevens op #socialemedia en met #chatbots. Dat #microtargeting een enorme invloed zal hebben op hoe de wereld door de slachtoffers wordt gezien. Bijna zonder uitzondering wordt mij te kennen gegeven dat ik overdrijf, dat er wat met mij aan de hand is, dat ik mij zoveel zorgen maak.
    theguardian.com/technology/202

  15. 🔬| Wie könnte in #Zukunft unsere Wahlentscheidung beeinflusst werden?

    Sicher auch für die Älteren interessant:

    In einem Beitrag für die #YoungSkeptix-Beitrag beschreibt Rowena wie Parteien in Zukunft für jede Person zugeschnittene #Wahlwerbung schnell und einfach durch #KI erstellen lassen können und wie man sich selbst vor dieser #Manipulation schützen kann.

    skeptix.org/2025/09/11/wie-koe

    #AI #Wahlen #NRW #microtargeting #nrwwahl

  16. 🔬| Wie könnte in #Zukunft unsere Wahlentscheidung beeinflusst werden?

    Sicher auch für die Älteren interessant:

    In einem Beitrag für die #YoungSkeptix-Beitrag beschreibt Rowena wie Parteien in Zukunft für jede Person zugeschnittene #Wahlwerbung schnell und einfach durch #KI erstellen lassen können und wie man sich selbst vor dieser #Manipulation schützen kann.

    skeptix.org/2025/09/11/wie-koe

    #AI #Wahlen #NRW #microtargeting #nrwwahl

  17. 🔬| Wie könnte in #Zukunft unsere Wahlentscheidung beeinflusst werden?

    Sicher auch für die Älteren interessant:

    In einem Beitrag für die #YoungSkeptix-Beitrag beschreibt Rowena wie Parteien in Zukunft für jede Person zugeschnittene #Wahlwerbung schnell und einfach durch #KI erstellen lassen können und wie man sich selbst vor dieser #Manipulation schützen kann.

    skeptix.org/2025/09/11/wie-koe

    #AI #Wahlen #NRW #microtargeting #nrwwahl

  18. 🔬| Wie könnte in #Zukunft unsere Wahlentscheidung beeinflusst werden?

    Sicher auch für die Älteren interessant:

    In einem Beitrag für die #YoungSkeptix-Beitrag beschreibt Rowena wie Parteien in Zukunft für jede Person zugeschnittene #Wahlwerbung schnell und einfach durch #KI erstellen lassen können und wie man sich selbst vor dieser #Manipulation schützen kann.

    skeptix.org/2025/09/11/wie-koe

    #AI #Wahlen #NRW #microtargeting #nrwwahl

  19. 🔬| Wie könnte in #Zukunft unsere Wahlentscheidung beeinflusst werden?

    Sicher auch für die Älteren interessant:

    In einem Beitrag für die #YoungSkeptix-Beitrag beschreibt Rowena wie Parteien in Zukunft für jede Person zugeschnittene #Wahlwerbung schnell und einfach durch #KI erstellen lassen können und wie man sich selbst vor dieser #Manipulation schützen kann.

    skeptix.org/2025/09/11/wie-koe

    #AI #Wahlen #NRW #microtargeting #nrwwahl

  20. "Prominent voices worry that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) will negatively impact elections worldwide and trigger a misinformation apocalypse. A recurrent fear is that GenAI will make it easier to influence voters and facilitate the creation and dissemination of potent mis- and disinformation. We argue that despite the incredible capabilities of GenAI systems, their influence on election outcomes has been overestimated. Looking back at 2024, the predicted outsized effects of GenAI did not happen and were overshadowed by traditional sources of influence. We review current evidence on the impact of GenAI in the 2024 elections and identify several reasons why the impact of GenAI on elections has been overblown. These include the inherent challenges of mass persuasion, the complexity of media effects and people’s interaction with technology, the difficulty of reaching target audiences, and the limited effectiveness of AI-driven microtargeting in political campaigns. Additionally, we argue that the socioeconomic, cultural, and personal factors that shape voting behavior outweigh the influence of AI-generated content. We further analyze the bifurcated discourse on GenAI’s role in elections, framing it as part of the ongoing “cycle of technology panics.” While acknowledging AI’s risks, such as amplifying social inequalities, we argue that focusing on AI distracts from more structural threats to elections and democracy, including voter disenfranchisement and attacks on election integrity. The paper calls for a recalibration of the narratives around AI and elections, proposing a nuanced approach that considers AI within broader sociopolitical contexts."

    knightcolumbia.org/content/don

    #AI #GenerativeAI #Disinformation #Elections #Politics #Misinformation #MassPersuasion #Microtargeting #MediaEffects

  21. "Prominent voices worry that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) will negatively impact elections worldwide and trigger a misinformation apocalypse. A recurrent fear is that GenAI will make it easier to influence voters and facilitate the creation and dissemination of potent mis- and disinformation. We argue that despite the incredible capabilities of GenAI systems, their influence on election outcomes has been overestimated. Looking back at 2024, the predicted outsized effects of GenAI did not happen and were overshadowed by traditional sources of influence. We review current evidence on the impact of GenAI in the 2024 elections and identify several reasons why the impact of GenAI on elections has been overblown. These include the inherent challenges of mass persuasion, the complexity of media effects and people’s interaction with technology, the difficulty of reaching target audiences, and the limited effectiveness of AI-driven microtargeting in political campaigns. Additionally, we argue that the socioeconomic, cultural, and personal factors that shape voting behavior outweigh the influence of AI-generated content. We further analyze the bifurcated discourse on GenAI’s role in elections, framing it as part of the ongoing “cycle of technology panics.” While acknowledging AI’s risks, such as amplifying social inequalities, we argue that focusing on AI distracts from more structural threats to elections and democracy, including voter disenfranchisement and attacks on election integrity. The paper calls for a recalibration of the narratives around AI and elections, proposing a nuanced approach that considers AI within broader sociopolitical contexts."

    knightcolumbia.org/content/don

    #AI #GenerativeAI #Disinformation #Elections #Politics #Misinformation #MassPersuasion #Microtargeting #MediaEffects

  22. "Prominent voices worry that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) will negatively impact elections worldwide and trigger a misinformation apocalypse. A recurrent fear is that GenAI will make it easier to influence voters and facilitate the creation and dissemination of potent mis- and disinformation. We argue that despite the incredible capabilities of GenAI systems, their influence on election outcomes has been overestimated. Looking back at 2024, the predicted outsized effects of GenAI did not happen and were overshadowed by traditional sources of influence. We review current evidence on the impact of GenAI in the 2024 elections and identify several reasons why the impact of GenAI on elections has been overblown. These include the inherent challenges of mass persuasion, the complexity of media effects and people’s interaction with technology, the difficulty of reaching target audiences, and the limited effectiveness of AI-driven microtargeting in political campaigns. Additionally, we argue that the socioeconomic, cultural, and personal factors that shape voting behavior outweigh the influence of AI-generated content. We further analyze the bifurcated discourse on GenAI’s role in elections, framing it as part of the ongoing “cycle of technology panics.” While acknowledging AI’s risks, such as amplifying social inequalities, we argue that focusing on AI distracts from more structural threats to elections and democracy, including voter disenfranchisement and attacks on election integrity. The paper calls for a recalibration of the narratives around AI and elections, proposing a nuanced approach that considers AI within broader sociopolitical contexts."

    knightcolumbia.org/content/don

    #AI #GenerativeAI #Disinformation #Elections #Politics #Misinformation #MassPersuasion #Microtargeting #MediaEffects

  23. "Prominent voices worry that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) will negatively impact elections worldwide and trigger a misinformation apocalypse. A recurrent fear is that GenAI will make it easier to influence voters and facilitate the creation and dissemination of potent mis- and disinformation. We argue that despite the incredible capabilities of GenAI systems, their influence on election outcomes has been overestimated. Looking back at 2024, the predicted outsized effects of GenAI did not happen and were overshadowed by traditional sources of influence. We review current evidence on the impact of GenAI in the 2024 elections and identify several reasons why the impact of GenAI on elections has been overblown. These include the inherent challenges of mass persuasion, the complexity of media effects and people’s interaction with technology, the difficulty of reaching target audiences, and the limited effectiveness of AI-driven microtargeting in political campaigns. Additionally, we argue that the socioeconomic, cultural, and personal factors that shape voting behavior outweigh the influence of AI-generated content. We further analyze the bifurcated discourse on GenAI’s role in elections, framing it as part of the ongoing “cycle of technology panics.” While acknowledging AI’s risks, such as amplifying social inequalities, we argue that focusing on AI distracts from more structural threats to elections and democracy, including voter disenfranchisement and attacks on election integrity. The paper calls for a recalibration of the narratives around AI and elections, proposing a nuanced approach that considers AI within broader sociopolitical contexts."

    knightcolumbia.org/content/don

    #AI #GenerativeAI #Disinformation #Elections #Politics #Misinformation #MassPersuasion #Microtargeting #MediaEffects

  24. "Prominent voices worry that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) will negatively impact elections worldwide and trigger a misinformation apocalypse. A recurrent fear is that GenAI will make it easier to influence voters and facilitate the creation and dissemination of potent mis- and disinformation. We argue that despite the incredible capabilities of GenAI systems, their influence on election outcomes has been overestimated. Looking back at 2024, the predicted outsized effects of GenAI did not happen and were overshadowed by traditional sources of influence. We review current evidence on the impact of GenAI in the 2024 elections and identify several reasons why the impact of GenAI on elections has been overblown. These include the inherent challenges of mass persuasion, the complexity of media effects and people’s interaction with technology, the difficulty of reaching target audiences, and the limited effectiveness of AI-driven microtargeting in political campaigns. Additionally, we argue that the socioeconomic, cultural, and personal factors that shape voting behavior outweigh the influence of AI-generated content. We further analyze the bifurcated discourse on GenAI’s role in elections, framing it as part of the ongoing “cycle of technology panics.” While acknowledging AI’s risks, such as amplifying social inequalities, we argue that focusing on AI distracts from more structural threats to elections and democracy, including voter disenfranchisement and attacks on election integrity. The paper calls for a recalibration of the narratives around AI and elections, proposing a nuanced approach that considers AI within broader sociopolitical contexts."

    knightcolumbia.org/content/don

    #AI #GenerativeAI #Disinformation #Elections #Politics #Misinformation #MassPersuasion #Microtargeting #MediaEffects

  25. Ja Ja, der Datenschutz
    Datenschutz ist der dünne Lack zwischen Profiling Microtargeting und Nudging es ist der minimale Schutz vor Stalking Doxing Identitätsdiebstahl.
    Datenschutz stört, wenn ein Dienst/ App nur einen Collateralnutzen für die User ins Schaufenster stellt, aber im Kern die Interessen von Politik, Staat und Wirtschaft bedienen soll. Das Märchen von der Fortschrittsbremse.

    #fortschrittsbremse #datenschutz #bsi #microtargeting #nudging

  26. Ja Ja, der Datenschutz
    Datenschutz ist der dünne Lack zwischen Profiling Microtargeting und Nudging es ist der minimale Schutz vor Stalking Doxing Identitätsdiebstahl.
    Datenschutz stört, wenn ein Dienst/ App nur einen Collateralnutzen für die User ins Schaufenster stellt, aber im Kern die Interessen von Politik, Staat und Wirtschaft bedienen soll. Das Märchen von der Fortschrittsbremse.

    #fortschrittsbremse #datenschutz #bsi #microtargeting #nudging

  27. Ja Ja, der Datenschutz
    Datenschutz ist der dünne Lack zwischen Profiling Microtargeting und Nudging es ist der minimale Schutz vor Stalking Doxing Identitätsdiebstahl.
    Datenschutz stört, wenn ein Dienst/ App nur einen Collateralnutzen für die User ins Schaufenster stellt, aber im Kern die Interessen von Politik, Staat und Wirtschaft bedienen soll. Das Märchen von der Fortschrittsbremse.

    #fortschrittsbremse #datenschutz #bsi #microtargeting #nudging

  28. Ja Ja, der Datenschutz
    Datenschutz ist der dünne Lack zwischen Profiling Microtargeting und Nudging es ist der minimale Schutz vor Stalking Doxing Identitätsdiebstahl.
    Datenschutz stört, wenn ein Dienst/ App nur einen Collateralnutzen für die User ins Schaufenster stellt, aber im Kern die Interessen von Politik, Staat und Wirtschaft bedienen soll. Das Märchen von der Fortschrittsbremse.

    #fortschrittsbremse #datenschutz #bsi #microtargeting #nudging

  29. New paper:

    ‘Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections: A topic modeling approach.’

    By Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, and me.

    Journal of Digital Social Research, open access.

    publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/v

    #politics #law #elections #netherlands #microtargeting #dsa #tech #advertising #meta #Facebook

  30. New paper:

    ‘Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections: A topic modeling approach.’

    By Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, and me.

    Journal of Digital Social Research, open access.

    publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/v

    #politics #law #elections #netherlands #microtargeting #dsa #tech #advertising #meta #Facebook

  31. New paper:

    ‘Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections: A topic modeling approach.’

    By Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, and me.

    Journal of Digital Social Research, open access.

    publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/v

    #politics #law #elections #netherlands #microtargeting #dsa #tech #advertising #meta #Facebook

  32. New paper:

    ‘Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections: A topic modeling approach.’

    By Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, and me.

    Journal of Digital Social Research, open access.

    publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/v

    #politics #law #elections #netherlands #microtargeting #dsa #tech #advertising #meta #Facebook

  33. New paper:

    ‘Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections: A topic modeling approach.’

    By Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, and me.

    Journal of Digital Social Research, open access.

    publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/v

    #politics #law #elections #netherlands #microtargeting #dsa #tech #advertising #meta #Facebook

  34. There is little research on #microtargeting ads so far. Mona Krewel & Jeanelle Frontin researched their impact in U.S. presidential #elections with the Meta Ad Data Set. They show that surprisingly not gender, age or location are used for targeting, but a persons interests instead. #WIConf2025

  35. There is little research on #microtargeting ads so far. Mona Krewel & Jeanelle Frontin researched their impact in U.S. presidential #elections with the Meta Ad Data Set. They show that surprisingly not gender, age or location are used for targeting, but a persons interests instead. #WIConf2025

  36. There is little research on #microtargeting ads so far. Mona Krewel & Jeanelle Frontin researched their impact in U.S. presidential #elections with the Meta Ad Data Set. They show that surprisingly not gender, age or location are used for targeting, but a persons interests instead. #WIConf2025

  37. There is little research on #microtargeting ads so far. Mona Krewel & Jeanelle Frontin researched their impact in U.S. presidential #elections with the Meta Ad Data Set. They show that surprisingly not gender, age or location are used for targeting, but a persons interests instead. #WIConf2025

  38. There is little research on #microtargeting ads so far. Mona Krewel & Jeanelle Frontin researched their impact in U.S. presidential #elections with the Meta Ad Data Set. They show that surprisingly not gender, age or location are used for targeting, but a persons interests instead. #WIConf2025

  39. 2/

    A manipulation technique also known as "microtargeting": "a type of personalised communication that involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements" [3].

    [3] on #microtargeting:
    - "it exploits personal data [...]
    - conceals its true nature [...]
    - allows [...] to make incompatible promises to different segments of the electorate". Potentially targeting #CognitiveBiases by opaque/foreign #misinformation & #disinformation

  40. 2/

    A manipulation technique also known as "microtargeting": "a type of personalised communication that involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements" [3].

    [3] on #microtargeting:
    - "it exploits personal data [...]
    - conceals its true nature [...]
    - allows [...] to make incompatible promises to different segments of the electorate". Potentially targeting #CognitiveBiases by opaque/foreign #misinformation & #disinformation

  41. 2/

    A manipulation technique also known as "microtargeting": "a type of personalised communication that involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements" [3].

    [3] on #microtargeting:
    - "it exploits personal data [...]
    - conceals its true nature [...]
    - allows [...] to make incompatible promises to different segments of the electorate". Potentially targeting #CognitiveBiases by opaque/foreign #misinformation & #disinformation

  42. 2/

    A manipulation technique also known as "microtargeting": "a type of personalised communication that involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements" [3].

    [3] on #microtargeting:
    - "it exploits personal data [...]
    - conceals its true nature [...]
    - allows [...] to make incompatible promises to different segments of the electorate". Potentially targeting #CognitiveBiases by opaque/foreign #misinformation & #disinformation

  43. 2/

    A manipulation technique also known as "microtargeting": "a type of personalised communication that involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements" [3].

    [3] on #microtargeting:
    - "it exploits personal data [...]
    - conceals its true nature [...]
    - allows [...] to make incompatible promises to different segments of the electorate". Potentially targeting #CognitiveBiases by opaque/foreign #misinformation & #disinformation

  44. This is what we're up against. Fact-free CERTAINTY from #MAGA muppets:

    x.com/MAGACult2/status/1896539

    Their echo chamber is fueled by right wing news outlets, but the real division was sown a while ago by #algorighmic #socialmedia and #microtargeting

    #bigtech didn't use 'divide and conquer', they used 'atomise and conquer' 😒

    And meanwhile the masses are cooperating in their own surveillance by feeding #surveillancecapitalism

    Any suggestions for how to bring people back to the 'shared centre'?

  45. This is what we're up against. Fact-free CERTAINTY from #MAGA muppets:

    x.com/MAGACult2/status/1896539

    Their echo chamber is fueled by right wing news outlets, but the real division was sown a while ago by #algorighmic #socialmedia and #microtargeting

    #bigtech didn't use 'divide and conquer', they used 'atomise and conquer' 😒

    And meanwhile the masses are cooperating in their own surveillance by feeding #surveillancecapitalism

    Any suggestions for how to bring people back to the 'shared centre'?

  46. This is what we're up against. Fact-free CERTAINTY from #MAGA muppets:

    x.com/MAGACult2/status/1896539

    Their echo chamber is fueled by right wing news outlets, but the real division was sown a while ago by #algorighmic #socialmedia and #microtargeting

    #bigtech didn't use 'divide and conquer', they used 'atomise and conquer' 😒

    And meanwhile the masses are cooperating in their own surveillance by feeding #surveillancecapitalism

    Any suggestions for how to bring people back to the 'shared centre'?

  47. This is what we're up against. Fact-free CERTAINTY from #MAGA muppets:

    x.com/MAGACult2/status/1896539

    Their echo chamber is fueled by right wing news outlets, but the real division was sown a while ago by #algorighmic #socialmedia and #microtargeting

    #bigtech didn't use 'divide and conquer', they used 'atomise and conquer' 😒

    And meanwhile the masses are cooperating in their own surveillance by feeding #surveillancecapitalism

    Any suggestions for how to bring people back to the 'shared centre'?

  48. This is what we're up against. Fact-free CERTAINTY from #MAGA muppets:

    x.com/MAGACult2/status/1896539

    Their echo chamber is fueled by right wing news outlets, but the real division was sown a while ago by #algorighmic #socialmedia and #microtargeting

    #bigtech didn't use 'divide and conquer', they used 'atomise and conquer' 😒

    And meanwhile the masses are cooperating in their own surveillance by feeding #surveillancecapitalism

    Any suggestions for how to bring people back to the 'shared centre'?

  49. @OmasgR Weil ihr einen Mastodon-Account bei #Digitalcourage habt, interessiert es euch vielleicht, dass Digitalcourage die Leute, bei denen ihr eure "Petition" untergebracht habt, vor 9 Jahren einen mit einem #BigBrotherAward geächtet hat: bigbrotherawards.de/2016/chang

    Damals waren die #innnit-Leute noch der deutsche Arm von #changeOrg. Inzwischen wird change.org in Deutschland von einem anderen Team gemacht.

    Ich fand die Laudatio für diesen Negativpreis nicht besonders gelungen. Die Preisvergabe war umstritten. Ich halte sie aber immer noch für gerechtfertigt, weil ich damals bei meinen Recherchen darauf stieß, dass change.org damit warb, Daten der Mitzeichnenden schön als Profil aufbereitet an Interessierte zu verkaufen, z.B. für #Microtargeting im britischen Wahlkampf. Nach der Preisvergabe gelobte change.org, damit aufzuhören. Warum sich Innnit später selbständig gemacht hat, ist mir nicht bekannt.

    Belege: archive.fo/diZhm

  50. @OmasgR Weil ihr einen Mastodon-Account bei #Digitalcourage habt, interessiert es euch vielleicht, dass Digitalcourage die Leute, bei denen ihr eure "Petition" untergebracht habt, vor 9 Jahren einen mit einem #BigBrotherAward geächtet hat: bigbrotherawards.de/2016/chang

    Damals waren die #innnit-Leute noch der deutsche Arm von #changeOrg. Inzwischen wird change.org in Deutschland von einem anderen Team gemacht.

    Ich fand die Laudatio für diesen Negativpreis nicht besonders gelungen. Die Preisvergabe war umstritten. Ich halte sie aber immer noch für gerechtfertigt, weil ich damals bei meinen Recherchen darauf stieß, dass change.org damit warb, Daten der Mitzeichnenden schön als Profil aufbereitet an Interessierte zu verkaufen, z.B. für #Microtargeting im britischen Wahlkampf. Nach der Preisvergabe gelobte change.org, damit aufzuhören. Warum sich Innnit später selbständig gemacht hat, ist mir nicht bekannt.

    Belege: archive.fo/diZhm