#second-amendment — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #second-amendment, aggregated by home.social.
-
The cases are the latest high-profile disputes over #guns to reach #SCOTUS since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded #SecondAmendment rights & spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country.
The case is expected to be heard in the fall.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar #AssaultWeapons #SemiautomaticRifles #Republicans
-
The cases are the latest high-profile disputes over #guns to reach #SCOTUS since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded #SecondAmendment rights & spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country.
The case is expected to be heard in the fall.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar #AssaultWeapons #SemiautomaticRifles #Republicans
-
The cases are the latest high-profile disputes over #guns to reach #SCOTUS since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded #SecondAmendment rights & spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country.
The case is expected to be heard in the fall.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar #AssaultWeapons #SemiautomaticRifles #Republicans
-
The cases are the latest high-profile disputes over #guns to reach #SCOTUS since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded #SecondAmendment rights & spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country.
The case is expected to be heard in the fall.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar #AssaultWeapons #SemiautomaticRifles #Republicans
-
The cases are the latest high-profile disputes over #guns to reach #SCOTUS since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded #SecondAmendment rights & spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country.
The case is expected to be heard in the fall.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar #AssaultWeapons #SemiautomaticRifles #Republicans
-
AYFKM? If I hear one more #Republican talk about how #dangerous #Chicago is, 🤯🤬
GET RID OF THE #GUNS EEJITS!!
#SCOTUS will consider striking down #AssaultWeapons #bans, in #Connecticut & the Chicago-area
A #SupremeCourt that has expanded #gun rights will consider whether bans on #SemiautomaticRifles, often called assault weapons, violate the #SecondAmendment.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e -
AYFKM? If I hear one more #Republican talk about how #dangerous #Chicago is, 🤯🤬
GET RID OF THE #GUNS EEJITS!!
#SCOTUS will consider striking down #AssaultWeapons #bans, in #Connecticut & the Chicago-area
A #SupremeCourt that has expanded #gun rights will consider whether bans on #SemiautomaticRifles, often called assault weapons, violate the #SecondAmendment.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e -
AYFKM? If I hear one more #Republican talk about how #dangerous #Chicago is, 🤯🤬
GET RID OF THE #GUNS EEJITS!!
#SCOTUS will consider striking down #AssaultWeapons #bans, in #Connecticut & the Chicago-area
A #SupremeCourt that has expanded #gun rights will consider whether bans on #SemiautomaticRifles, often called assault weapons, violate the #SecondAmendment.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e -
AYFKM? If I hear one more #Republican talk about how #dangerous #Chicago is, 🤯🤬
GET RID OF THE #GUNS EEJITS!!
#SCOTUS will consider striking down #AssaultWeapons #bans, in #Connecticut & the Chicago-area
A #SupremeCourt that has expanded #gun rights will consider whether bans on #SemiautomaticRifles, often called assault weapons, violate the #SecondAmendment.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e -
AYFKM? If I hear one more #Republican talk about how #dangerous #Chicago is, 🤯🤬
GET RID OF THE #GUNS EEJITS!!
#SCOTUS will consider striking down #AssaultWeapons #bans, in #Connecticut & the Chicago-area
A #SupremeCourt that has expanded #gun rights will consider whether bans on #SemiautomaticRifles, often called assault weapons, violate the #SecondAmendment.
#law #GunControl #GunLaws #WMDs #WeaponsOfWar
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e -
U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions – What They Mean for You
The U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up another historic term, issuing several decisions that could affect millions of Americans. From digital privacy and voting rules to presidential authority and gun rights, the Court’s rulings have implications that reach far beyond Washington, D.C.
Whether you live in Raleigh, North Carolina, or anywhere else in the country, here’s a straightforward look at some of the Court’s most significant recent decisions and how they may impact your daily life.
Digital Privacy: Geofence Warrants Face New Constitutional Limits
One of the term’s biggest technology and privacy decisions involved geofence warrants—court orders that require companies like Google to provide location information for devices near a crime scene.
The Supreme Court ruled that accessing this type of location history is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment and must receive constitutional protections. The case was returned to lower courts for additional review rather than creating a blanket rule for every geofence warrant. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Stronger recognition of digital privacy rights.
- Law enforcement may face stricter legal standards before obtaining broad location data.
- Smartphone users could receive greater constitutional protection over their location history.
Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
In another closely watched case, the Court expanded presidential authority by allowing the President greater power to remove members of certain independent federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling overturned a major precedent that had been in place since 1935. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
Potential long-term effects could include:
- Changes in how independent federal agencies operate.
- Different approaches to consumer protection and business regulation depending on the administration in power.
- Increased presidential influence over parts of the federal government.
Mail-In Ballots
The Supreme Court upheld laws allowing states to count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked on or before Election Day. The decision affects voting procedures in multiple states that already use similar rules. (The Guardian)
What This Means for You
- Voters in states with these laws may continue to have mailed ballots counted if they meet state deadlines.
- Election officials will continue following their state’s existing ballot-counting rules unless state legislatures change them.
Gun Rights Continue to Expand
The Court issued decisions that broaden protections under the Second Amendment, including striking down certain restrictions on carrying firearms on private property open to the public and limiting enforcement of one federal firearm prohibition. The rulings also signal that the Court may hear additional firearm-related cases in future terms. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Some state and local firearm restrictions may face additional legal challenges.
- Future Supreme Court decisions could further shape gun laws nationwide.
- State firearm regulations may continue evolving through litigation.
Why These Decisions Matter
Supreme Court decisions often become the law of the land, influencing:
- Personal privacy
- Voting and elections
- Consumer protections
- Government authority
- Criminal investigations
- Constitutional rights
Many of these rulings will continue to be interpreted by lower courts, meaning their full impact may not be known for months or even years.
How Could North Carolina Residents Be Affected?
For people across Raleigh and North Carolina, these decisions may influence:
- Privacy protections involving smartphones and digital technology.
- Future election procedures and voting policies.
- Consumer protections enforced by federal agencies.
- Firearm regulations challenged in federal courts.
- Future legal cases involving constitutional rights.
While some rulings take effect immediately, others simply establish legal standards that lower courts and lawmakers will apply over time.
Staying Informed
Supreme Court decisions often shape American life in ways that aren’t immediately obvious. From the apps you use on your phone to how elections are conducted and how federal agencies operate, the Court’s opinions can have lasting consequences for individuals, businesses, and local communities.
DoRaleigh.com will continue covering major legal, government, and public policy developments that matter to residents throughout Raleigh, Wake County, and the Triangle, helping explain what national decisions mean at the local level.
Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin
Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.
Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.Published by Bryan Tomlinson | BTDesigns.pro | DoRaleigh.com
#CivicEducation #ConstitutionalLaw #DigitalPrivacy #DoRaleigh #GeofenceWarrants #GovernmentNews #MailInBallots #News #NorthCarolinaNews #PresidentialPowers #PublicPolicy #RaleighNews #SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt2026 #SupremeCourtDecisions #USNews #USSupremeCourt #VotingRights -
U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions – What They Mean for You
The U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up another historic term, issuing several decisions that could affect millions of Americans. From digital privacy and voting rules to presidential authority and gun rights, the Court’s rulings have implications that reach far beyond Washington, D.C.
Whether you live in Raleigh, North Carolina, or anywhere else in the country, here’s a straightforward look at some of the Court’s most significant recent decisions and how they may impact your daily life.
Digital Privacy: Geofence Warrants Face New Constitutional Limits
One of the term’s biggest technology and privacy decisions involved geofence warrants—court orders that require companies like Google to provide location information for devices near a crime scene.
The Supreme Court ruled that accessing this type of location history is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment and must receive constitutional protections. The case was returned to lower courts for additional review rather than creating a blanket rule for every geofence warrant. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Stronger recognition of digital privacy rights.
- Law enforcement may face stricter legal standards before obtaining broad location data.
- Smartphone users could receive greater constitutional protection over their location history.
Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
In another closely watched case, the Court expanded presidential authority by allowing the President greater power to remove members of certain independent federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling overturned a major precedent that had been in place since 1935. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
Potential long-term effects could include:
- Changes in how independent federal agencies operate.
- Different approaches to consumer protection and business regulation depending on the administration in power.
- Increased presidential influence over parts of the federal government.
Mail-In Ballots
The Supreme Court upheld laws allowing states to count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked on or before Election Day. The decision affects voting procedures in multiple states that already use similar rules. (The Guardian)
What This Means for You
- Voters in states with these laws may continue to have mailed ballots counted if they meet state deadlines.
- Election officials will continue following their state’s existing ballot-counting rules unless state legislatures change them.
Gun Rights Continue to Expand
The Court issued decisions that broaden protections under the Second Amendment, including striking down certain restrictions on carrying firearms on private property open to the public and limiting enforcement of one federal firearm prohibition. The rulings also signal that the Court may hear additional firearm-related cases in future terms. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Some state and local firearm restrictions may face additional legal challenges.
- Future Supreme Court decisions could further shape gun laws nationwide.
- State firearm regulations may continue evolving through litigation.
Why These Decisions Matter
Supreme Court decisions often become the law of the land, influencing:
- Personal privacy
- Voting and elections
- Consumer protections
- Government authority
- Criminal investigations
- Constitutional rights
Many of these rulings will continue to be interpreted by lower courts, meaning their full impact may not be known for months or even years.
How Could North Carolina Residents Be Affected?
For people across Raleigh and North Carolina, these decisions may influence:
- Privacy protections involving smartphones and digital technology.
- Future election procedures and voting policies.
- Consumer protections enforced by federal agencies.
- Firearm regulations challenged in federal courts.
- Future legal cases involving constitutional rights.
While some rulings take effect immediately, others simply establish legal standards that lower courts and lawmakers will apply over time.
Staying Informed
Supreme Court decisions often shape American life in ways that aren’t immediately obvious. From the apps you use on your phone to how elections are conducted and how federal agencies operate, the Court’s opinions can have lasting consequences for individuals, businesses, and local communities.
DoRaleigh.com will continue covering major legal, government, and public policy developments that matter to residents throughout Raleigh, Wake County, and the Triangle, helping explain what national decisions mean at the local level.
Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin
Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.
Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.Published by Bryan Tomlinson | BTDesigns.pro | DoRaleigh.com
#CivicEducation #ConstitutionalLaw #DigitalPrivacy #DoRaleigh #GeofenceWarrants #GovernmentNews #MailInBallots #News #NorthCarolinaNews #PresidentialPowers #PublicPolicy #RaleighNews #SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt2026 #SupremeCourtDecisions #USNews #USSupremeCourt #VotingRights -
U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions – What They Mean for You
The U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up another historic term, issuing several decisions that could affect millions of Americans. From digital privacy and voting rules to presidential authority and gun rights, the Court’s rulings have implications that reach far beyond Washington, D.C.
Whether you live in Raleigh, North Carolina, or anywhere else in the country, here’s a straightforward look at some of the Court’s most significant recent decisions and how they may impact your daily life.
Digital Privacy: Geofence Warrants Face New Constitutional Limits
One of the term’s biggest technology and privacy decisions involved geofence warrants—court orders that require companies like Google to provide location information for devices near a crime scene.
The Supreme Court ruled that accessing this type of location history is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment and must receive constitutional protections. The case was returned to lower courts for additional review rather than creating a blanket rule for every geofence warrant. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Stronger recognition of digital privacy rights.
- Law enforcement may face stricter legal standards before obtaining broad location data.
- Smartphone users could receive greater constitutional protection over their location history.
Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
In another closely watched case, the Court expanded presidential authority by allowing the President greater power to remove members of certain independent federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling overturned a major precedent that had been in place since 1935. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
Potential long-term effects could include:
- Changes in how independent federal agencies operate.
- Different approaches to consumer protection and business regulation depending on the administration in power.
- Increased presidential influence over parts of the federal government.
Mail-In Ballots
The Supreme Court upheld laws allowing states to count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked on or before Election Day. The decision affects voting procedures in multiple states that already use similar rules. (The Guardian)
What This Means for You
- Voters in states with these laws may continue to have mailed ballots counted if they meet state deadlines.
- Election officials will continue following their state’s existing ballot-counting rules unless state legislatures change them.
Gun Rights Continue to Expand
The Court issued decisions that broaden protections under the Second Amendment, including striking down certain restrictions on carrying firearms on private property open to the public and limiting enforcement of one federal firearm prohibition. The rulings also signal that the Court may hear additional firearm-related cases in future terms. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Some state and local firearm restrictions may face additional legal challenges.
- Future Supreme Court decisions could further shape gun laws nationwide.
- State firearm regulations may continue evolving through litigation.
Why These Decisions Matter
Supreme Court decisions often become the law of the land, influencing:
- Personal privacy
- Voting and elections
- Consumer protections
- Government authority
- Criminal investigations
- Constitutional rights
Many of these rulings will continue to be interpreted by lower courts, meaning their full impact may not be known for months or even years.
How Could North Carolina Residents Be Affected?
For people across Raleigh and North Carolina, these decisions may influence:
- Privacy protections involving smartphones and digital technology.
- Future election procedures and voting policies.
- Consumer protections enforced by federal agencies.
- Firearm regulations challenged in federal courts.
- Future legal cases involving constitutional rights.
While some rulings take effect immediately, others simply establish legal standards that lower courts and lawmakers will apply over time.
Staying Informed
Supreme Court decisions often shape American life in ways that aren’t immediately obvious. From the apps you use on your phone to how elections are conducted and how federal agencies operate, the Court’s opinions can have lasting consequences for individuals, businesses, and local communities.
DoRaleigh.com will continue covering major legal, government, and public policy developments that matter to residents throughout Raleigh, Wake County, and the Triangle, helping explain what national decisions mean at the local level.
Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin
Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.
Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.Published by Bryan Tomlinson | BTDesigns.pro | DoRaleigh.com
#CivicEducation #ConstitutionalLaw #DigitalPrivacy #DoRaleigh #GeofenceWarrants #GovernmentNews #MailInBallots #News #NorthCarolinaNews #PresidentialPowers #PublicPolicy #RaleighNews #SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt2026 #SupremeCourtDecisions #USNews #USSupremeCourt #VotingRights -
U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions – What They Mean for You
The U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up another historic term, issuing several decisions that could affect millions of Americans. From digital privacy and voting rules to presidential authority and gun rights, the Court’s rulings have implications that reach far beyond Washington, D.C.
Whether you live in Raleigh, North Carolina, or anywhere else in the country, here’s a straightforward look at some of the Court’s most significant recent decisions and how they may impact your daily life.
Digital Privacy: Geofence Warrants Face New Constitutional Limits
One of the term’s biggest technology and privacy decisions involved geofence warrants—court orders that require companies like Google to provide location information for devices near a crime scene.
The Supreme Court ruled that accessing this type of location history is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment and must receive constitutional protections. The case was returned to lower courts for additional review rather than creating a blanket rule for every geofence warrant. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Stronger recognition of digital privacy rights.
- Law enforcement may face stricter legal standards before obtaining broad location data.
- Smartphone users could receive greater constitutional protection over their location history.
Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
In another closely watched case, the Court expanded presidential authority by allowing the President greater power to remove members of certain independent federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling overturned a major precedent that had been in place since 1935. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
Potential long-term effects could include:
- Changes in how independent federal agencies operate.
- Different approaches to consumer protection and business regulation depending on the administration in power.
- Increased presidential influence over parts of the federal government.
Mail-In Ballots
The Supreme Court upheld laws allowing states to count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked on or before Election Day. The decision affects voting procedures in multiple states that already use similar rules. (The Guardian)
What This Means for You
- Voters in states with these laws may continue to have mailed ballots counted if they meet state deadlines.
- Election officials will continue following their state’s existing ballot-counting rules unless state legislatures change them.
Gun Rights Continue to Expand
The Court issued decisions that broaden protections under the Second Amendment, including striking down certain restrictions on carrying firearms on private property open to the public and limiting enforcement of one federal firearm prohibition. The rulings also signal that the Court may hear additional firearm-related cases in future terms. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Some state and local firearm restrictions may face additional legal challenges.
- Future Supreme Court decisions could further shape gun laws nationwide.
- State firearm regulations may continue evolving through litigation.
Why These Decisions Matter
Supreme Court decisions often become the law of the land, influencing:
- Personal privacy
- Voting and elections
- Consumer protections
- Government authority
- Criminal investigations
- Constitutional rights
Many of these rulings will continue to be interpreted by lower courts, meaning their full impact may not be known for months or even years.
How Could North Carolina Residents Be Affected?
For people across Raleigh and North Carolina, these decisions may influence:
- Privacy protections involving smartphones and digital technology.
- Future election procedures and voting policies.
- Consumer protections enforced by federal agencies.
- Firearm regulations challenged in federal courts.
- Future legal cases involving constitutional rights.
While some rulings take effect immediately, others simply establish legal standards that lower courts and lawmakers will apply over time.
Staying Informed
Supreme Court decisions often shape American life in ways that aren’t immediately obvious. From the apps you use on your phone to how elections are conducted and how federal agencies operate, the Court’s opinions can have lasting consequences for individuals, businesses, and local communities.
DoRaleigh.com will continue covering major legal, government, and public policy developments that matter to residents throughout Raleigh, Wake County, and the Triangle, helping explain what national decisions mean at the local level.
Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin
Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.
Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.Published by Bryan Tomlinson | BTDesigns.pro | DoRaleigh.com
#CivicEducation #ConstitutionalLaw #DigitalPrivacy #DoRaleigh #GeofenceWarrants #GovernmentNews #MailInBallots #News #NorthCarolinaNews #PresidentialPowers #PublicPolicy #RaleighNews #SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt2026 #SupremeCourtDecisions #USNews #USSupremeCourt #VotingRights -
U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decisions – What They Mean for You
The U.S. Supreme Court has wrapped up another historic term, issuing several decisions that could affect millions of Americans. From digital privacy and voting rules to presidential authority and gun rights, the Court’s rulings have implications that reach far beyond Washington, D.C.
Whether you live in Raleigh, North Carolina, or anywhere else in the country, here’s a straightforward look at some of the Court’s most significant recent decisions and how they may impact your daily life.
Digital Privacy: Geofence Warrants Face New Constitutional Limits
One of the term’s biggest technology and privacy decisions involved geofence warrants—court orders that require companies like Google to provide location information for devices near a crime scene.
The Supreme Court ruled that accessing this type of location history is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment and must receive constitutional protections. The case was returned to lower courts for additional review rather than creating a blanket rule for every geofence warrant. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Stronger recognition of digital privacy rights.
- Law enforcement may face stricter legal standards before obtaining broad location data.
- Smartphone users could receive greater constitutional protection over their location history.
Presidential Power Over Federal Agencies
In another closely watched case, the Court expanded presidential authority by allowing the President greater power to remove members of certain independent federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling overturned a major precedent that had been in place since 1935. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
Potential long-term effects could include:
- Changes in how independent federal agencies operate.
- Different approaches to consumer protection and business regulation depending on the administration in power.
- Increased presidential influence over parts of the federal government.
Mail-In Ballots
The Supreme Court upheld laws allowing states to count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked on or before Election Day. The decision affects voting procedures in multiple states that already use similar rules. (The Guardian)
What This Means for You
- Voters in states with these laws may continue to have mailed ballots counted if they meet state deadlines.
- Election officials will continue following their state’s existing ballot-counting rules unless state legislatures change them.
Gun Rights Continue to Expand
The Court issued decisions that broaden protections under the Second Amendment, including striking down certain restrictions on carrying firearms on private property open to the public and limiting enforcement of one federal firearm prohibition. The rulings also signal that the Court may hear additional firearm-related cases in future terms. (Reuters)
What This Means for You
- Some state and local firearm restrictions may face additional legal challenges.
- Future Supreme Court decisions could further shape gun laws nationwide.
- State firearm regulations may continue evolving through litigation.
Why These Decisions Matter
Supreme Court decisions often become the law of the land, influencing:
- Personal privacy
- Voting and elections
- Consumer protections
- Government authority
- Criminal investigations
- Constitutional rights
Many of these rulings will continue to be interpreted by lower courts, meaning their full impact may not be known for months or even years.
How Could North Carolina Residents Be Affected?
For people across Raleigh and North Carolina, these decisions may influence:
- Privacy protections involving smartphones and digital technology.
- Future election procedures and voting policies.
- Consumer protections enforced by federal agencies.
- Firearm regulations challenged in federal courts.
- Future legal cases involving constitutional rights.
While some rulings take effect immediately, others simply establish legal standards that lower courts and lawmakers will apply over time.
Staying Informed
Supreme Court decisions often shape American life in ways that aren’t immediately obvious. From the apps you use on your phone to how elections are conducted and how federal agencies operate, the Court’s opinions can have lasting consequences for individuals, businesses, and local communities.
DoRaleigh.com will continue covering major legal, government, and public policy developments that matter to residents throughout Raleigh, Wake County, and the Triangle, helping explain what national decisions mean at the local level.
Connect With Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin
Share With Us: Post your community News, Events, on our Submissions Page.
Advertise With Us: Interested in Advertising click here.Published by Bryan Tomlinson | BTDesigns.pro | DoRaleigh.com
#CivicEducation #ConstitutionalLaw #DigitalPrivacy #DoRaleigh #GeofenceWarrants #GovernmentNews #MailInBallots #News #NorthCarolinaNews #PresidentialPowers #PublicPolicy #RaleighNews #SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt2026 #SupremeCourtDecisions #USNews #USSupremeCourt #VotingRights -
The NEW Soylent Green
A Moses-like figure stands before the mic at an NRA convention and thunders, “I will give you my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.”
At the end of the sci-fi film Soylent Green, that same actor implores his detective boss to spread the news, “Soylent Green is people!”
In the movie, as the corpses pile up from an overcrowded, miserable earth, they are carted away in garbage trucks, secretly converted to Soylent Green, and fed back to the living. Soylent Green is better than the old Red and Yellow varieties, but it is scarce, so there are riots. A detective played by Charlton Heston discovers the deception. In a word, humanity has become cannibals, feeding upon itself, in a state-sanctioned system of cyclical violence.
Such is the world created by the NRA. It plays upon the irrational fears of a few to continue to thwart common sense gun legislation. Its largely successful lobbying over the years has distorted the original intention of the Second Amendment so much so that it has become almost impossible to pass laws more in keeping with the Founders’ intent.
When the bodies continue to pile up as a result of gun violence, and there is no legislative change primarily due to the lobbying of the NRA and the like, we are in every sense of the word disrespecting the dead and feeding upon ourselves.
In a state-sanctioned system of cyclical violence.
Like in Soylent Green.
And like the movie, the end result is not very pretty.
But go ahead. Watch the news.
Take another bite.
June 23, 2014
#2ndAmmendment #AmericanGunCulture #cannibalisticSociety #CharltonHeston #commonSenseGunLaws #cultureOfFear #cyclicalViolence #deathAndPolitics #Dystopia #Film #gunControl #GunViolence #legislativeParalysis #massShootings #moralOutrage #newsCommentary #NRA #politicalLobbying #propheticWriting #publicPolicy #Satire #SecondAmendment #socialCritique #socialDecay #SoylentGreen #stateSanctionedViolence #Violence #violenceInAmerica -
The NEW Soylent Green
A Moses-like figure stands before the mic at an NRA convention and thunders, “I will give you my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.”
At the end of the sci-fi film Soylent Green, that same actor implores his detective boss to spread the news, “Soylent Green is people!”
In the movie, as the corpses pile up from an overcrowded, miserable earth, they are carted away in garbage trucks, secretly converted to Soylent Green, and fed back to the living. Soylent Green is better than the old Red and Yellow varieties, but it is scarce, so there are riots. A detective played by Charlton Heston discovers the deception. In a word, humanity has become cannibals, feeding upon itself, in a state-sanctioned system of cyclical violence.
Such is the world created by the NRA. It plays upon the irrational fears of a few to continue to thwart common sense gun legislation. Its largely successful lobbying over the years has distorted the original intention of the Second Amendment so much so that it has become almost impossible to pass laws more in keeping with the Founders’ intent.
When the bodies continue to pile up as a result of gun violence, and there is no legislative change primarily due to the lobbying of the NRA and the like, we are in every sense of the word disrespecting the dead and feeding upon ourselves.
In a state-sanctioned system of cyclical violence.
Like in Soylent Green.
And like the movie, the end result is not very pretty.
But go ahead. Watch the news.
Take another bite.
June 23, 2014
#2ndAmmendment #AmericanGunCulture #cannibalisticSociety #CharltonHeston #commonSenseGunLaws #cultureOfFear #cyclicalViolence #deathAndPolitics #Dystopia #Film #gunControl #GunViolence #legislativeParalysis #massShootings #moralOutrage #newsCommentary #NRA #politicalLobbying #propheticWriting #publicPolicy #Satire #SecondAmendment #socialCritique #socialDecay #SoylentGreen #stateSanctionedViolence #Violence #violenceInAmerica -
https://www.europesays.com/news/46460/ St. Louis gun couple case still reverberates six years later #CrimeWorld #Headlines #Missouri #News #SecondAmendment #StLouis #TopStories #Us #UsProtests
-
"Funny" how that works
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2168196/funny-how-that-works
-
Lees tip -> Hooggerechtshof VS schrapt wapenwet Hawaii | Het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof heeft een wapenwet van Hawaii verworpen, waardoor vergunde wapenbezitters eenvoudiger vuurwapens mogen dragen in publiek toegankelijke bedrijven. | #SupremeCourt #SecondAmendment #HooggerechtshofVS #Hawaii #wapenwet #Vuurwapens #VerenigdeStaten |
https://hbpmedia.nl/hooggerechtshof-vs-schrapt-wapenwet-hawaii/
-
Lees tip -> Hooggerechtshof VS schrapt wapenwet Hawaii | Het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof heeft een wapenwet van Hawaii verworpen, waardoor vergunde wapenbezitters eenvoudiger vuurwapens mogen dragen in publiek toegankelijke bedrijven. | #SupremeCourt #SecondAmendment #HooggerechtshofVS #Hawaii #wapenwet #Vuurwapens #VerenigdeStaten |
https://hbpmedia.nl/hooggerechtshof-vs-schrapt-wapenwet-hawaii/
-
#SCOTUS struckdown a #Hawaii #law requiring people to get permission to carry #guns into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing #2A rights.
The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.
It’s a win for the #Trump admin, which argued the law violates the #SecondAmendment. It’s also a win for #MassShooting planners.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-trump-c5dbdf945bc870f70a03455f5eb1dec7
-
#SCOTUS struckdown a #Hawaii #law requiring people to get permission to carry #guns into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing #2A rights.
The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.
It’s a win for the #Trump admin, which argued the law violates the #SecondAmendment. It’s also a win for #MassShooting planners.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-trump-c5dbdf945bc870f70a03455f5eb1dec7
-
#SCOTUS struckdown a #Hawaii #law requiring people to get permission to carry #guns into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing #2A rights.
The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.
It’s a win for the #Trump admin, which argued the law violates the #SecondAmendment. It’s also a win for #MassShooting planners.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-trump-c5dbdf945bc870f70a03455f5eb1dec7
-
#SCOTUS struckdown a #Hawaii #law requiring people to get permission to carry #guns into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing #2A rights.
The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.
It’s a win for the #Trump admin, which argued the law violates the #SecondAmendment. It’s also a win for #MassShooting planners.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-trump-c5dbdf945bc870f70a03455f5eb1dec7
-
#SCOTUS struckdown a #Hawaii #law requiring people to get permission to carry #guns into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing #2A rights.
The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.
It’s a win for the #Trump admin, which argued the law violates the #SecondAmendment. It’s also a win for #MassShooting planners.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-trump-c5dbdf945bc870f70a03455f5eb1dec7
-
The Judicial Demise of Categorical Disarmament: United States v. Hemani and the Constitutional Viability of Section 922(g)(1):
The conceptual core of the Hemani decision—that the government cannot categorically label a broad group of people as "dangerous" to strip them of their Second Amendment rights without an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness—has immediate, devastating implications for the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Section 922(g)(1) is the most frequently prosecuted federal firearms offense in the United States, operating as a strict, lifetime, blanket ban on firearm possession for any individual convicted of any crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, regardless of whether the predicate offense involved a single act of violence.
Under Hemani, the government's standard defense of § 922(g)(1) faces a profound constitutional challenge. Historically, federal prosecutors defended the permanent disarmament of all felons by arguing that the legislature has the categorical authority to deem anyone who commits a felony as "unfit" or "dangerous". However, the Hemani majority explicitly adopted the core principle articulated by then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett in her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019): that the founding-era tradition of disarmament focuses strictly on "dangerousness, not status". #uspol #hemani #scotus #maga #2a #secondamendment #firearm -
The Judicial Demise of Categorical Disarmament: United States v. Hemani and the Constitutional Viability of Section 922(g)(1):
The conceptual core of the Hemani decision—that the government cannot categorically label a broad group of people as "dangerous" to strip them of their Second Amendment rights without an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness—has immediate, devastating implications for the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Section 922(g)(1) is the most frequently prosecuted federal firearms offense in the United States, operating as a strict, lifetime, blanket ban on firearm possession for any individual convicted of any crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, regardless of whether the predicate offense involved a single act of violence.
Under Hemani, the government's standard defense of § 922(g)(1) faces a profound constitutional challenge. Historically, federal prosecutors defended the permanent disarmament of all felons by arguing that the legislature has the categorical authority to deem anyone who commits a felony as "unfit" or "dangerous". However, the Hemani majority explicitly adopted the core principle articulated by then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett in her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019): that the founding-era tradition of disarmament focuses strictly on "dangerousness, not status". #uspol #hemani #scotus #maga #2a #secondamendment #firearm -
The Judicial Demise of Categorical Disarmament: United States v. Hemani and the Constitutional Viability of Section 922(g)(1):
The conceptual core of the Hemani decision—that the government cannot categorically label a broad group of people as "dangerous" to strip them of their Second Amendment rights without an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness—has immediate, devastating implications for the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Section 922(g)(1) is the most frequently prosecuted federal firearms offense in the United States, operating as a strict, lifetime, blanket ban on firearm possession for any individual convicted of any crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, regardless of whether the predicate offense involved a single act of violence.
Under Hemani, the government's standard defense of § 922(g)(1) faces a profound constitutional challenge. Historically, federal prosecutors defended the permanent disarmament of all felons by arguing that the legislature has the categorical authority to deem anyone who commits a felony as "unfit" or "dangerous". However, the Hemani majority explicitly adopted the core principle articulated by then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett in her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019): that the founding-era tradition of disarmament focuses strictly on "dangerousness, not status". #uspol #hemani #scotus #maga #2a #secondamendment #firearm -
The Judicial Demise of Categorical Disarmament: United States v. Hemani and the Constitutional Viability of Section 922(g)(1):
The conceptual core of the Hemani decision—that the government cannot categorically label a broad group of people as "dangerous" to strip them of their Second Amendment rights without an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness—has immediate, devastating implications for the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Section 922(g)(1) is the most frequently prosecuted federal firearms offense in the United States, operating as a strict, lifetime, blanket ban on firearm possession for any individual convicted of any crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, regardless of whether the predicate offense involved a single act of violence.
Under Hemani, the government's standard defense of § 922(g)(1) faces a profound constitutional challenge. Historically, federal prosecutors defended the permanent disarmament of all felons by arguing that the legislature has the categorical authority to deem anyone who commits a felony as "unfit" or "dangerous". However, the Hemani majority explicitly adopted the core principle articulated by then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett in her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019): that the founding-era tradition of disarmament focuses strictly on "dangerousness, not status". #uspol #hemani #scotus #maga #2a #secondamendment #firearm -
Arguably United States v. Hemani and Bruen have indefinitely changed the landscape of Second Amendment jurisprudence #uspol #firearm #secondamendment #2A
-
Arguably United States v. Hemani and Bruen have indefinitely changed the landscape of Second Amendment jurisprudence #uspol #firearm #secondamendment #2A
-
Arguably United States v. Hemani and Bruen have indefinitely changed the landscape of Second Amendment jurisprudence #uspol #firearm #secondamendment #2A
-
Arguably United States v. Hemani and Bruen have indefinitely changed the landscape of Second Amendment jurisprudence #uspol #firearm #secondamendment #2A
-
Arguably United States v. Hemani and Bruen have indefinitely changed the landscape of Second Amendment jurisprudence #uspol #firearm #secondamendment #2A
-
https://www.europesays.com/news/42126/ Supreme Court Narrows Law Banning Drug Users From Owning Guns #AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion #Biden #DecisionsAndVerdicts #DonaldJ #Headlines #hunter #LawAndLegislation #Marijuana #NewYorkStateRifle&PistolAssociationVBruen(SupremeCourtDecision) #News #SecondAmendment(USConstitution) #SupremeCourt(US) #TopStories #trump #UnitedStatesPoliticsAndGovernment
-
This is what two #SocialMedia accounts published:
House Republicans wrote: "The #SecondAmendment is your right. It is not up for negotiation. Republicans will always defend it."House Democrats wrote: "Unless your name was Alex Pretti."
#ICE #lawlessness #politics #Minneapolis -
This is what two #SocialMedia accounts published:
House Republicans wrote: "The #SecondAmendment is your right. It is not up for negotiation. Republicans will always defend it."House Democrats wrote: "Unless your name was Alex Pretti."
#ICE #lawlessness #politics #Minneapolis -
This is what two #SocialMedia accounts published:
House Republicans wrote: "The #SecondAmendment is your right. It is not up for negotiation. Republicans will always defend it."House Democrats wrote: "Unless your name was Alex Pretti."
#ICE #lawlessness #politics #Minneapolis -
This is what two #SocialMedia accounts published:
House Republicans wrote: "The #SecondAmendment is your right. It is not up for negotiation. Republicans will always defend it."House Democrats wrote: "Unless your name was Alex Pretti."
#ICE #lawlessness #politics #Minneapolis -
The #SecondAmendment says we have the right to bear arms, not to bear #artillery. -- Robin Williams
-
Just another day in America
-
Just another day in America
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2085835/just-another-day-in-america
-
Just another day in America
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2085835/just-another-day-in-america
-
Just another day in America
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2085835/just-another-day-in-america
-
Just another day in America
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2085835/just-another-day-in-america
-
Remember - you NEED your Second Amendment rights to resist the latter; but if you're caught with a gun by the former, you'll be executed on the spot!
-
Remember - you NEED your Second Amendment rights to resist the latter; but if you're caught with a gun by the former, you'll be executed on the spot!
-
Remember - you NEED your Second Amendment rights to resist the latter; but if you're caught with a gun by the former, you'll be executed on the spot!
-
Remember - you NEED your Second Amendment rights to resist the latter; but if you're caught with a gun by the former, you'll be executed on the spot!
-
"But muh guns will save us from tyranny!"
-
"But muh guns will save us from tyranny!"
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2046986/but-muh-guns-will-save-us-from-tyranny
-
"But muh guns will save us from tyranny!"
-
"But muh guns will save us from tyranny!"
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2046986/but-muh-guns-will-save-us-from-tyranny
-
"But muh guns will save us from tyranny!"
https://piefed.social/c/political_memes/p/2046986/but-muh-guns-will-save-us-from-tyranny