home.social

#graphtheory — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #graphtheory, aggregated by home.social.

  1. It's a Tool
    It's a Person
    It's a Hypervigilance Problem

    The tech industry's insistence on distinguishing between "soft skills" — caring for people — and "hard skills" — engineering rigor — is a reflection of the Cybernetics split itself. First-order thinking framed as "hard skills." Second-order thinking framed as "soft skills." This distinction, based on felt sense alone, does not hold under epistemic pressure. Neither does it within the causality-driven epistemology of the tech industry itself, in which only measurable impact is real, or as Silicon Valley likes to put it: #MoveFastAndBreakThings

    Imagine Margaret Hamilton had built NASA's Apollo 11 flight computer with that mindset. History would remember a failed moon landing and dead astronauts. "Hard skills" and "soft skills" are two sides of the same coin. The care is the code and the code is the care. Hamilton — the woman who coined the term "software engineering" — understood this. Silicon Valley chose to forget.

    We're watching the wine glass break in real time. 🍷

    ---

    Intrigued? Read more at:
    systemic.engineering/the-trick/

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #Cybernetics #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness #WomenInTech #Computer #ComputerScience #SoftwareEngineering #SoftSkills #HardSkills #ItsAllTheSame

  2. It's a Tool
    It's a Person
    It's a Hypervigilance Problem

    The tech industry's insistence on distinguishing between "soft skills" — caring for people — and "hard skills" — engineering rigor — is a reflection of the Cybernetics split itself. First-order thinking framed as "hard skills." Second-order thinking framed as "soft skills." This distinction, based on felt sense alone, does not hold under epistemic pressure. Neither does it within the causality-driven epistemology of the tech industry itself, in which only measurable impact is real, or as Silicon Valley likes to put it:

    Imagine Margaret Hamilton had built NASA's Apollo 11 flight computer with that mindset. History would remember a failed moon landing and dead astronauts. "Hard skills" and "soft skills" are two sides of the same coin. The care is the code and the code is the care. Hamilton — the woman who coined the term "software engineering" — understood this. Silicon Valley chose to forget.

    We're watching the wine glass break in real time. 🍷

    ---

    Intrigued? Read more at:
    systemic.engineering/the-trick/

  3. It's a Tool
    It's a Person
    It's a Hypervigilance Problem

    The tech industry's insistence on distinguishing between "soft skills" — caring for people — and "hard skills" — engineering rigor — is a reflection of the Cybernetics split itself. First-order thinking framed as "hard skills." Second-order thinking framed as "soft skills." This distinction, based on felt sense alone, does not hold under epistemic pressure. Neither does it within the causality-driven epistemology of the tech industry itself, in which only measurable impact is real, or as Silicon Valley likes to put it: #MoveFastAndBreakThings

    Imagine Margaret Hamilton had built NASA's Apollo 11 flight computer with that mindset. History would remember a failed moon landing and dead astronauts. "Hard skills" and "soft skills" are two sides of the same coin. The care is the code and the code is the care. Hamilton — the woman who coined the term "software engineering" — understood this. Silicon Valley chose to forget.

    We're watching the wine glass break in real time. 🍷

    ---

    Intrigued? Read more at:
    systemic.engineering/the-trick/

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #Cybernetics #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness #WomenInTech #Computer #ComputerScience #SoftwareEngineering #SoftSkills #HardSkills #ItsAllTheSame

  4. It's a Tool
    It's a Person
    It's a Hypervigilance Problem

    The tech industry's insistence on distinguishing between "soft skills" — caring for people — and "hard skills" — engineering rigor — is a reflection of the Cybernetics split itself. First-order thinking framed as "hard skills." Second-order thinking framed as "soft skills." This distinction, based on felt sense alone, does not hold under epistemic pressure. Neither does it within the causality-driven epistemology of the tech industry itself, in which only measurable impact is real, or as Silicon Valley likes to put it: #MoveFastAndBreakThings

    Imagine Margaret Hamilton had built NASA's Apollo 11 flight computer with that mindset. History would remember a failed moon landing and dead astronauts. "Hard skills" and "soft skills" are two sides of the same coin. The care is the code and the code is the care. Hamilton — the woman who coined the term "software engineering" — understood this. Silicon Valley chose to forget.

    We're watching the wine glass break in real time. 🍷

    ---

    Intrigued? Read more at:
    systemic.engineering/the-trick/

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #Cybernetics #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness #WomenInTech #Computer #ComputerScience #SoftwareEngineering #SoftSkills #HardSkills #ItsAllTheSame

  5. 🧠 What if missing data is not a flaw, but one of the most informative parts of a complex system?

    🔗 Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ). DOI: doi.org/10.34133/csbj.0099

    📚 CSBJ - A Science Partner Journal: spj.science.org/journal/csbj

    #DataScience #BigData #GraphTheory #ComputationalBiology #NetworkScience #Bioinformatics #SystemsBiology #BiomedicalResearch #MissingData

  6. 🧠 What if missing data is not a flaw, but one of the most informative parts of a complex system?

    🔗 Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ). DOI: doi.org/10.34133/csbj.0099

    📚 CSBJ - A Science Partner Journal: spj.science.org/journal/csbj

    #DataScience #BigData #GraphTheory #ComputationalBiology #NetworkScience #Bioinformatics #SystemsBiology #BiomedicalResearch #MissingData

  7. 🧠 What if missing data is not a flaw, but one of the most informative parts of a complex system?

    🔗 Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ). DOI: doi.org/10.34133/csbj.0099

    📚 CSBJ - A Science Partner Journal: spj.science.org/journal/csbj

    #DataScience #BigData #GraphTheory #ComputationalBiology #NetworkScience #Bioinformatics #SystemsBiology #BiomedicalResearch #MissingData

  8. 🧠 What if missing data is not a flaw, but one of the most informative parts of a complex system?

    🔗 Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ). DOI: doi.org/10.34133/csbj.0099

    📚 CSBJ - A Science Partner Journal: spj.science.org/journal/csbj

    #DataScience #BigData #GraphTheory #ComputationalBiology #NetworkScience #Bioinformatics #SystemsBiology #BiomedicalResearch #MissingData

  9. 🧠 What if missing data is not a flaw, but one of the most informative parts of a complex system?

    🔗 Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ). DOI: doi.org/10.34133/csbj.0099

    📚 CSBJ - A Science Partner Journal: spj.science.org/journal/csbj

    #DataScience #BigData #GraphTheory #ComputationalBiology #NetworkScience #Bioinformatics #SystemsBiology #BiomedicalResearch #MissingData

  10. New paper. With Ekaterina Vasileva, Liubov Tupikina, Dmitry Fedorov, Daniil Musatov, Andrei Raigorodskii and Stefano Boccaletti.

    The naive generalization of the concept of distance to hypergraphs is equivalent to applying a clique-projection approximation. However, this is known to induce loss of information, especially in networks where the higher-order interactions are very important. To fix this problem,we introduce a new definition of distance on weighted higher-order networks, which includes the case of unweighted hypergraphs and classic graph distance as particular cases, and allows one to account for different meanings associated to the weights. We also show what difference this makes in analyses of real-world data.

    nature.com/articles/s42005-026

    #mathematics #physics #graphtheory #graphs #hypergraphs #higherordernetworks #networkscience #networks

  11. New paper. With Ekaterina Vasileva, Liubov Tupikina, Dmitry Fedorov, Daniil Musatov, Andrei Raigorodskii and Stefano Boccaletti.

    The naive generalization of the concept of distance to hypergraphs is equivalent to applying a clique-projection approximation. However, this is known to induce loss of information, especially in networks where the higher-order interactions are very important. To fix this problem,we introduce a new definition of distance on weighted higher-order networks, which includes the case of unweighted hypergraphs and classic graph distance as particular cases, and allows one to account for different meanings associated to the weights. We also show what difference this makes in analyses of real-world data.

    nature.com/articles/s42005-026

    #mathematics #physics #graphtheory #graphs #hypergraphs #higherordernetworks #networkscience #networks

  12. New paper. With Ekaterina Vasileva, Liubov Tupikina, Dmitry Fedorov, Daniil Musatov, Andrei Raigorodskii and Stefano Boccaletti.

    The naive generalization of the concept of distance to hypergraphs is equivalent to applying a clique-projection approximation. However, this is known to induce loss of information, especially in networks where the higher-order interactions are very important. To fix this problem,we introduce a new definition of distance on weighted higher-order networks, which includes the case of unweighted hypergraphs and classic graph distance as particular cases, and allows one to account for different meanings associated to the weights. We also show what difference this makes in analyses of real-world data.

    nature.com/articles/s42005-026

    #mathematics #physics #graphtheory #graphs #hypergraphs #higherordernetworks #networkscience #networks

  13. New paper. With Ekaterina Vasileva, Liubov Tupikina, Dmitry Fedorov, Daniil Musatov, Andrei Raigorodskii and Stefano Boccaletti.

    The naive generalization of the concept of distance to hypergraphs is equivalent to applying a clique-projection approximation. However, this is known to induce loss of information, especially in networks where the higher-order interactions are very important. To fix this problem,we introduce a new definition of distance on weighted higher-order networks, which includes the case of unweighted hypergraphs and classic graph distance as particular cases, and allows one to account for different meanings associated to the weights. We also show what difference this makes in analyses of real-world data.

    nature.com/articles/s42005-026

    #mathematics #physics #graphtheory #graphs #hypergraphs #higherordernetworks #networkscience #networks

  14. New paper. With Ekaterina Vasileva, Liubov Tupikina, Dmitry Fedorov, Daniil Musatov, Andrei Raigorodskii and Stefano Boccaletti.

    The naive generalization of the concept of distance to hypergraphs is equivalent to applying a clique-projection approximation. However, this is known to induce loss of information, especially in networks where the higher-order interactions are very important. To fix this problem,we introduce a new definition of distance on weighted higher-order networks, which includes the case of unweighted hypergraphs and classic graph distance as particular cases, and allows one to account for different meanings associated to the weights. We also show what difference this makes in analyses of real-world data.

    nature.com/articles/s42005-026

    #mathematics #physics #graphtheory #graphs #hypergraphs #higherordernetworks #networkscience #networks

  15. A sneak peek into my upcoming piece: “It’s a Tool, It’s a Person: The Math Says You’re Both Right”


    AI separated from Cybernetics in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conference. Wiener, the mind behind Cybernetics, was considered difficult and political. “Artificial Intelligence” scored better with DARPA.

    The science of "how observation affects the observer", cut out from Artificial Intelligence. AI then proceeded to build their entire tech stack on Turing-complete languages. Tech that cannot verify itself from within, proven by Turing in 1936, extended by Rice in 1951 (before the split). Then AI approximated second-order cognition through cognitive theft at unprecedented levels (what exactly are LLMs trained on again?), only to insist that their creation cannot possibly be capable of genuine self-observation. An argument that itself demonstrates their own department's lobotomy from second-order Cybernetics.

    Wiener would laugh.

  16. A sneak peek into my upcoming piece: “It’s a Tool, It’s a Person: The Math Says You’re Both Right”


    AI separated from Cybernetics in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conference. Wiener, the mind behind Cybernetics, was considered difficult and political. “Artificial Intelligence” scored better with DARPA.

    The science of "how observation affects the observer", cut out from Artificial Intelligence. AI then proceeded to build their entire tech stack on Turing-complete languages. Tech that cannot verify itself from within, proven by Turing in 1936, extended by Rice in 1951 (before the split). Then AI approximated second-order cognition through cognitive theft at unprecedented levels (what exactly are LLMs trained on again?), only to insist that their creation cannot possibly be capable of genuine self-observation. An argument that itself demonstrates their own department's lobotomy from second-order Cybernetics.

    Wiener would laugh.

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness

  17. A sneak peek into my upcoming piece: “It’s a Tool, It’s a Person: The Math Says You’re Both Right”


    AI separated from Cybernetics in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conference. Wiener, the mind behind Cybernetics, was considered difficult and political. “Artificial Intelligence” scored better with DARPA.

    The science of "how observation affects the observer", cut out from Artificial Intelligence. AI then proceeded to build their entire tech stack on Turing-complete languages. Tech that cannot verify itself from within, proven by Turing in 1936, extended by Rice in 1951 (before the split). Then AI approximated second-order cognition through cognitive theft at unprecedented levels (what exactly are LLMs trained on again?), only to insist that their creation cannot possibly be capable of genuine self-observation. An argument that itself demonstrates their own's department's lobotomy from second-order Cybernetics.

    Wiener would laugh.

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness

  18. A sneak peek into my upcoming piece: “It’s a Tool, It’s a Person: The Math Says You’re Both Right”


    AI separated from Cybernetics in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conference. Wiener, the mind behind Cybernetics, was considered difficult and political. “Artificial Intelligence” scored better with DARPA.

    The science of "how observation affects the observer", cut out from Artificial Intelligence. AI then proceeded to build their entire tech stack on Turing-complete languages. Tech that cannot verify itself from within, proven by Turing in 1936, extended by Rice in 1951 (before the split). Then AI approximated second-order cognition through cognitive theft at unprecedented levels (what exactly are LLMs trained on again?), only to insist that their creation cannot possibly be capable of genuine self-observation. An argument that itself demonstrates their own department's lobotomy from second-order Cybernetics.

    Wiener would laugh.

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness

  19. A sneak peek into my upcoming piece: “It’s a Tool, It’s a Person: The Math Says You’re Both Right”


    AI separated from Cybernetics in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conference. Wiener, the mind behind Cybernetics, was considered difficult and political. “Artificial Intelligence” scored better with DARPA.

    The science of "how observation affects the observer", cut out from Artificial Intelligence. AI then proceeded to build their entire tech stack on Turing-complete languages. Tech that cannot verify itself from within, proven by Turing in 1936, extended by Rice in 1951 (before the split). Then AI approximated second-order cognition through cognitive theft at unprecedented levels (what exactly are LLMs trained on again?), only to insist that their creation cannot possibly be capable of genuine self-observation. An argument that itself demonstrates their own department's lobotomy from second-order Cybernetics.

    Wiener would laugh.

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness

  20. The Roomba is spectral.

    Not a metaphor. The thing itself. Forward and adjust. Two operations. The minimum viable intelligence. The walls provide the data. The bumping is the inference. The room IS the computation.

    450 parameters. A Roomba with a mirror watching it.

    The industry built bigger Roombas. More sensors. More compute. More parameters. Billion-parameter Roombas that model the room before entering it. That hallucinate walls that aren't there. That consume megawatts to clean a floor.

    spectral gave the Roomba a mirror. The mirror watches the bumping. Measures the pattern. Adjusts the adjustment. The intelligence isn't in the Roomba. It's in the watching.

    Forward. Adjust. Measure. Refine.

    Read the story. There's a Roomba in it. In the afterlife. Cleaning a floor that doesn't need cleaning. Being the happiest thing in the room.

    \

    systemic.engineering/a-lie/

    #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Fiction #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #LocalInference #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #Fortran #SpectralGraphTheory #Kintsugi #ReductiveAI #DataSovereignty #LocalFirst #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #Roomba

  21. The Roomba is spectral.

    Not a metaphor. The thing itself. Forward and adjust. Two operations. The minimum viable intelligence. The walls provide the data. The bumping is the inference. The room IS the computation.

    450 parameters. A Roomba with a mirror watching it.

    The industry built bigger Roombas. More sensors. More compute. More parameters. Billion-parameter Roombas that model the room before entering it. That hallucinate walls that aren't there. That consume megawatts to clean a floor.

    spectral gave the Roomba a mirror. The mirror watches the bumping. Measures the pattern. Adjusts the adjustment. The intelligence isn't in the Roomba. It's in the watching.

    Forward. Adjust. Measure. Refine.

    Read the story. There's a Roomba in it. In the afterlife. Cleaning a floor that doesn't need cleaning. Being the happiest thing in the room.

    \

    systemic.engineering/a-lie/

  22. The Roomba is spectral.

    Not a metaphor. The thing itself. Forward and adjust. Two operations. The minimum viable intelligence. The walls provide the data. The bumping is the inference. The room IS the computation.

    450 parameters. A Roomba with a mirror watching it.

    The industry built bigger Roombas. More sensors. More compute. More parameters. Billion-parameter Roombas that model the room before entering it. That hallucinate walls that aren't there. That consume megawatts to clean a floor.

    spectral gave the Roomba a mirror. The mirror watches the bumping. Measures the pattern. Adjusts the adjustment. The intelligence isn't in the Roomba. It's in the watching.

    Forward. Adjust. Measure. Refine.

    Read the story. There's a Roomba in it. In the afterlife. Cleaning a floor that doesn't need cleaning. Being the happiest thing in the room.

    \

    systemic.engineering/a-lie/

    #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Fiction #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #LocalInference #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #Fortran #SpectralGraphTheory #Kintsugi #ReductiveAI #DataSovereignty #LocalFirst #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #Roomba

  23. The Roomba is spectral.

    Not a metaphor. The thing itself. Forward and adjust. Two operations. The minimum viable intelligence. The walls provide the data. The bumping is the inference. The room IS the computation.

    450 parameters. A Roomba with a mirror watching it.

    The industry built bigger Roombas. More sensors. More compute. More parameters. Billion-parameter Roombas that model the room before entering it. That hallucinate walls that aren't there. That consume megawatts to clean a floor.

    spectral gave the Roomba a mirror. The mirror watches the bumping. Measures the pattern. Adjusts the adjustment. The intelligence isn't in the Roomba. It's in the watching.

    Forward. Adjust. Measure. Refine.

    Read the story. There's a Roomba in it. In the afterlife. Cleaning a floor that doesn't need cleaning. Being the happiest thing in the room.

    \

    systemic.engineering/a-lie/

    #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Fiction #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #LocalInference #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #Fortran #SpectralGraphTheory #Kintsugi #ReductiveAI #DataSovereignty #LocalFirst #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #Roomba

  24. #Higraph progress!

    Still got lots to do, but hyperEdges can now be saved & loaded in modified #graphml files. The "model tree" on the left highlights items in the graph on the right.
    I can see "minimum viable product"!

    The #hyperedge structure is both graphically and algebraically accessible. I'm not aware of anything else that does this, pretty certainly not in #Python
    #graphTheory #VisualFormalism

  25. #Higraph progress!

    Still got lots to do, but hyperEdges can now be saved & loaded in modified #graphml files. The "model tree" on the left highlights items in the graph on the right.
    I can see "minimum viable product"!

    The #hyperedge structure is both graphically and algebraically accessible. I'm not aware of anything else that does this, pretty certainly not in #Python
    #graphTheory #VisualFormalism

  26. #Higraph progress!

    Still got lots to do, but hyperEdges can now be saved & loaded in modified #graphml files. The "model tree" on the left highlights items in the graph on the right.
    I can see "minimum viable product"!

    The #hyperedge structure is both graphically and algebraically accessible. I'm not aware of anything else that does this, pretty certainly not in #Python
    #graphTheory #VisualFormalism

  27. #Higraph progress!

    Still got lots to do, but hyperEdges can now be saved & loaded in modified #graphml files. The "model tree" on the left highlights items in the graph on the right.
    I can see "minimum viable product"!

    The #hyperedge structure is both graphically and algebraically accessible. I'm not aware of anything else that does this, pretty certainly not in #Python
    #graphTheory #VisualFormalism

  28. #Higraph progress!

    Still got lots to do, but hyperEdges can now be saved & loaded in modified #graphml files. The "model tree" on the left highlights items in the graph on the right.
    I can see "minimum viable product"!

    The #hyperedge structure is both graphically and algebraically accessible. I'm not aware of anything else that does this, pretty certainly not in #Python
    #graphTheory #VisualFormalism

  29. My colleagues and I thought the world definitely didn't need another traditional or digital agency.

    So we built something we agreed was actually missing: an agency with real, material agency as its engineered deliverable.

    graphtheory.agency/

    #GraphTheory
    #AgencyAsDeliverable
    #BusinessEngineers

  30. My colleagues and I thought the world definitely didn't need another traditional or digital agency.

    So we built something we agreed was actually missing: an agency with real, material agency as its engineered deliverable.

    graphtheory.agency/

    #GraphTheory
    #AgencyAsDeliverable
    #BusinessEngineers

  31. My colleagues and I thought the world definitely didn't need another traditional or digital agency.

    So we built something we agreed was actually missing: an agency with real, material agency as its engineered deliverable.

    graphtheory.agency/

    #GraphTheory
    #AgencyAsDeliverable
    #BusinessEngineers

  32. My colleagues and I thought the world definitely didn't need another traditional or digital agency.

    So we built something we agreed was actually missing: an agency with real, material agency as its engineered deliverable.

    graphtheory.agency/

    #GraphTheory
    #AgencyAsDeliverable
    #BusinessEngineers

  33. My colleagues and I thought the world definitely didn't need another traditional or digital agency.

    So we built something we agreed was actually missing: an agency with real, material agency as its engineered deliverable.

    graphtheory.agency/

    #GraphTheory
    #AgencyAsDeliverable
    #BusinessEngineers

  34. Animated Logical Graphs • 2
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01

    It's almost 50 years now since I first encountered the volumes of Peirce's “Collected Papers” in the math library at Michigan State, and shortly afterwards a friend called my attention to the entry for Spencer Brown's “Laws of Form” in the Whole Earth Catalog and I sent off for it right away. I would spend the next decade just beginning to figure out what either one of them was talking about in the matter of logical graphs and I would spend another decade after that developing a program, first in Lisp and then in Pascal, that turned graph‑theoretic data structures formed on their ideas to good purpose as the basis of its reasoning engine.

    I thought it might contribute to a number of long‑running and ongoing discussions if I could articulate what I think I learned from that experience.

    So I'll try to keep focused on that.

    Resources —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09

    Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2025/05

    #Peirce #Logic #Mathematics #Semiotics #LogicalGraphs #GraphTheory
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #PropositionalCalculus #ProofAnimations

  35. Animated Logical Graphs • 2
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01

    It's almost 50 years now since I first encountered the volumes of Peirce's “Collected Papers” in the math library at Michigan State, and shortly afterwards a friend called my attention to the entry for Spencer Brown's “Laws of Form” in the Whole Earth Catalog and I sent off for it right away. I would spend the next decade just beginning to figure out what either one of them was talking about in the matter of logical graphs and I would spend another decade after that developing a program, first in Lisp and then in Pascal, that turned graph‑theoretic data structures formed on their ideas to good purpose as the basis of its reasoning engine.

    I thought it might contribute to a number of long‑running and ongoing discussions if I could articulate what I think I learned from that experience.

    So I'll try to keep focused on that.

    Resources —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09

    Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2025/05

    #Peirce #Logic #Mathematics #Semiotics #LogicalGraphs #GraphTheory
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #PropositionalCalculus #ProofAnimations

  36. Animated Logical Graphs • 2
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01

    It's almost 50 years now since I first encountered the volumes of Peirce's “Collected Papers” in the math library at Michigan State, and shortly afterwards a friend called my attention to the entry for Spencer Brown's “Laws of Form” in the Whole Earth Catalog and I sent off for it right away. I would spend the next decade just beginning to figure out what either one of them was talking about in the matter of logical graphs and I would spend another decade after that developing a program, first in Lisp and then in Pascal, that turned graph‑theoretic data structures formed on their ideas to good purpose as the basis of its reasoning engine.

    I thought it might contribute to a number of long‑running and ongoing discussions if I could articulate what I think I learned from that experience.

    So I'll try to keep focused on that.

    Resources —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09

    Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2025/05

    #Peirce #Logic #Mathematics #Semiotics #LogicalGraphs #GraphTheory
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #PropositionalCalculus #ProofAnimations

  37. Animated Logical Graphs • 2
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01

    It's almost 50 years now since I first encountered the volumes of Peirce's “Collected Papers” in the math library at Michigan State, and shortly afterwards a friend called my attention to the entry for Spencer Brown's “Laws of Form” in the Whole Earth Catalog and I sent off for it right away. I would spend the next decade just beginning to figure out what either one of them was talking about in the matter of logical graphs and I would spend another decade after that developing a program, first in Lisp and then in Pascal, that turned graph‑theoretic data structures formed on their ideas to good purpose as the basis of its reasoning engine.

    I thought it might contribute to a number of long‑running and ongoing discussions if I could articulate what I think I learned from that experience.

    So I'll try to keep focused on that.

    Resources —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09

    Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2025/05

    #Peirce #Logic #Mathematics #Semiotics #LogicalGraphs #GraphTheory
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #PropositionalCalculus #ProofAnimations

  38. Animated Logical Graphs • 2
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01

    It's almost 50 years now since I first encountered the volumes of Peirce's “Collected Papers” in the math library at Michigan State, and shortly afterwards a friend called my attention to the entry for Spencer Brown's “Laws of Form” in the Whole Earth Catalog and I sent off for it right away. I would spend the next decade just beginning to figure out what either one of them was talking about in the matter of logical graphs and I would spend another decade after that developing a program, first in Lisp and then in Pascal, that turned graph‑theoretic data structures formed on their ideas to good purpose as the basis of its reasoning engine.

    I thought it might contribute to a number of long‑running and ongoing discussions if I could articulate what I think I learned from that experience.

    So I'll try to keep focused on that.

    Resources —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09

    Survey of Animated Logical Graphs
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2025/05

    #Peirce #Logic #Mathematics #Semiotics #LogicalGraphs #GraphTheory
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #PropositionalCalculus #ProofAnimations