home.social

#paradox — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #paradox, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. #Paradox examples:

    1/ our hero's can think we are attacking them when we're trying to help them
    (e.g. offer suggestions or point out some possibilities to improve things)

    2/ when we get close to people (online or offliine) we can start to critique or attack them (with our words) which is a kind of complement because we think they are ~80% perfect and think "if they only did this then they could 'save the planet' etc "...

    3/ in reality many people are just as flawed as us.

    #My #XP #Shrug

  2. #Fleisch essen trotz #Tierliebe. Viele Menschen leben täglich mit diesem inneren Konflikt.

    Wenn die Werte dem Handeln widersprechen, spricht man von kognitiver #Dissonanz.

    Und die ist der Grund, warum die Debatte um Fragen rund um #Fleischkonsum schnell persönlich und emotional werden.

    Fragen dazu, wieso Fleisch so billig ist und welche versteckten Kosten der Fleischkonsum für die #Gesellschaft bedeutet.

    Es geht um #Steuervergünstigungen, #Subventionen, die wahren #Lebensmittelpreise und die #Wissenschaft dahinter.

    Es geht um #Tierethik, #Gesundheit und #Nachhaltigkeit.

    Wie trennen #Fakten und Gefühle und fragen uns:

    Was muss passieren, damit sich Dinge ändern?

    Und die Antwort ist überraschend pragmatisch.

    Kapitel:
    0:00 Das Fleischkonsum #Paradox
    0:47 #Veganismus #Vegan
    4:09 Warum essen Menschen Fleisch?
    4:45 Werbung Emma
    5:52 Was kostet die vegane #Ernährung?
    7:48 Fleisch als politische Streitfrage
    10:54 Eigene Meinung

    youtube.com/watch?v=-Y_1l7dHSFg

    @foodwatch_INT
    #Pflanzlich

  3. “All is change”*…

    If all of the parts of a ship are sequentially replaced over time, is the resulting ship the same ship as the original? (source)

    The Wikipedia article on the Ship of Theseus has changed entirely since its inception.

    A paradoxical thought experiment made meta: “The Same Boat,” from Greg Ross in his wonderful blog, Futility Closet.

    * Euripedes, Heracles (and others, e.g., Marcus Aurelius, echoing Heraclitus)

    ###

    As we contemplate conundra, we might recall that it was on this date in 1971 that the mix was completed on David Bowie’s “Changes,” which had been recorded nine days earlier at Trident Studios in London. Co-produced by Bowie and Ken Scott, it featured Rick Wakeman on piano and the musicians who would later become known as the Spiders from MarsMick RonsonTrevor Bolder and Mick Woodmansey.

    “Changes” is widely considered to be one of Bowie’s best songs and has appeared on many best-of lists. His biographers have suggested that the track is a manifesto of his entire career, predicting a constant change of musical styles: the first verse focuses on the compulsive nature of artistic reinvention and distancing oneself from the rock mainstream; the second verse concerns clashes between children and their parents, urging them to allow their children to be themselves as teenagers. Bowie frequently included the song in his live performances; it was the final song he performed on stage before his death in 2016.

    See Bowie perform it here.

    source

    #Changes #culture #DavidBowie #FutilityCloset #GregRoss #history #music #paradox #philosophy #ShipOfTheseus #thoughtExperiment #Wikipedia
  4. “All is change”*…

    If all of the parts of a ship are sequentially replaced over time, is the resulting ship the same ship as the original? (source)

    The Wikipedia article on the Ship of Theseus has changed entirely since its inception.

    A paradoxical thought experiment made meta: “The Same Boat,” from Greg Ross in his wonderful blog, Futility Closet.

    * Euripedes, Heracles (and others, e.g., Marcus Aurelius, echoing Heraclitus)

    ###

    As we contemplate conundra, we might recall that it was on this date in 1971 that the mix was completed on David Bowie’s “Changes,” which had been recorded nine days earlier at Trident Studios in London. Co-produced by Bowie and Ken Scott, it featured Rick Wakeman on piano and the musicians who would later become known as the Spiders from MarsMick RonsonTrevor Bolder and Mick Woodmansey.

    “Changes” is widely considered to be one of Bowie’s best songs and has appeared on many best-of lists. His biographers have suggested that the track is a manifesto of his entire career, predicting a constant change of musical styles: the first verse focuses on the compulsive nature of artistic reinvention and distancing oneself from the rock mainstream; the second verse concerns clashes between children and their parents, urging them to allow their children to be themselves as teenagers. Bowie frequently included the song in his live performances; it was the final song he performed on stage before his death in 2016.

    See Bowie perform it here.

    source

    #Changes #culture #DavidBowie #FutilityCloset #GregRoss #history #music #paradox #philosophy #ShipOfTheseus #thoughtExperiment #Wikipedia
  5. Paradox!

    Das Ausschneiden eines Hakenkreuzes bedeutet nicht das man dieses nicht mehr sieht!

    Meisterjeder, Dadaist und AntiFa 7/26
    #dada #Paradox #AntiFa

  6. Paradox!

    Das Ausschneiden eines Hakenkreuzes bedeutet nicht das man dieses nicht mehr sieht!

    Meisterjeder, Dadaist und AntiFa 7/26
    #dada #Paradox #AntiFa

  7. Most people don't want to harm #animals or the #climate but also eat #meat. They use subconscious #coping strategies to reduce cognitive #dissonance caused by this #paradox. Dairy-related coping strategies overlap—with the added justification that #dairy is “neglectable”: doi.org/10.1007/s410...

    Beyond Natural, Normal, Necess...

  8. Most people don't want to harm #animals or the #climate but also eat #meat. They use subconscious #coping strategies to reduce cognitive #dissonance caused by this #paradox. Dairy-related coping strategies overlap—with the added justification that #dairy is “neglectable”: doi.org/10.1007/s410...

    Beyond Natural, Normal, Necess...

  9. Newsflash

    I have developed an uncanny ability to tell, from a person's avatar alone, whether they're likely to be anti-artificial intelligence.

    A paradox: there is, too often for my liking, something unnervingly artificial about the avatars that are chosen by anti-AI protesters.

    Methinks they doth protest too much.

    #AI #paradox

  10. Newsflash

    I have developed an uncanny ability to tell, from a person's avatar alone, whether they're likely to be anti-artificial intelligence.

    A paradox: there is, too often for my liking, something unnervingly artificial about the avatars that are chosen by anti-AI protesters.

    Methinks they doth protest too much.

    #AI #paradox

  11. @Beggarmidas I think of the next generation of children as the next adults.

    It's been hard because children are attached to parents - of which most are too busy / overwhelmed or want to stay oblivious / not be against the #system.

    So I'm in a locked #paradox;

    Adults don't want to listen and children hardly can / can't implement it because adults have such an inherited lock on environment.

    This is why I appeal to social engine developers to make it part of their mission. <Is that a good idea?

  12. @argv_minus_one Ah, this attitude I find as the problem.

    Taking care of the planet and people is part of our nature otherwise it leaves it too open into other people's hands (not your fault but #paradox of life is leaving it to others = #irresponsible).

    So without big judgement, if you are not interested in saving the planet even 50% - then that is part of the overall problem.

    This then goes back to Trumps Musks running riot because people leave it to others or write off "saving the planet".

  13. @argv_minus_one Ah, this attitude I find as the problem.

    Taking care of the planet and people is part of our nature otherwise it leaves it too open into other people's hands (not your fault but #paradox of life is leaving it to others = #irresponsible).

    So without big judgement, if you are not interested in saving the planet even 50% - then that is part of the overall problem.

    This then goes back to Trumps Musks running riot because people leave it to others or write off "saving the planet".

  14. #Paradox - the last 500 years scientists have invented lenses to see bigger and smaller things like out into the #solar system and into a #cell. Say the path of lens invention continues, is it likely that scientists might develop even better lenses that reveal more about matter and space, and if this continued, we might see things infinitely tinier than the cell? At least bigger than the Milky Way though. We agree that space might not end anywhere. But what if it goes infinitely smaller as well?

  15. #Paradox - the last 500 years scientists have invented lenses to see bigger and smaller things like out into the #solar system and into a #cell. Say the path of lens invention continues, is it likely that scientists might develop even better lenses that reveal more about matter and space, and if this continued, we might see things infinitely tinier than the cell? At least bigger than the Milky Way though. We agree that space might not end anywhere. But what if it goes infinitely smaller as well?

  16. here’s a #paradox to consider: over the last 500 years or so humans have developed lenses that allowed them to see increasingly bigger and smaller things like out into the #solar system and into a #cell. I believe that #infinity exists in both directions. Out into space and into the cell. No lens will be enough to see the end of it or comprehend. no better lenses will be developed because humanity is about to die off. Also, it’s just a paradox.

  17. Ever notice how two things can seem like total opposites, yet both are completely true at the same time? Life loves a good paradox.

    ​A couple of classic examples:

    Light is both a wave and a particle. In physics, depending on how you measure it, light behaves like continuous ripples in water and like tiny individual packets of energy. It threw scientists for a loop, but both are fundamentally true.

    ​You can deeply love someone and also be incredibly annoyed by them. Human emotion isn't a zero-sum game. Holding space for gratitude and frustration simultaneously is just part of the messy human experience.

    ​Truth isn't always an "either/or"—a lot of the time, it's a "both/and."
    ​#Philosophy #Physics #Paradox #Nuance #Mindset

  18. Ever notice how two things can seem like total opposites, yet both are completely true at the same time? Life loves a good paradox.

    ​A couple of classic examples:

    Light is both a wave and a particle. In physics, depending on how you measure it, light behaves like continuous ripples in water and like tiny individual packets of energy. It threw scientists for a loop, but both are fundamentally true.

    ​You can deeply love someone and also be incredibly annoyed by them. Human emotion isn't a zero-sum game. Holding space for gratitude and frustration simultaneously is just part of the messy human experience.

    ​Truth isn't always an "either/or"—a lot of the time, it's a "both/and."
    ​#Philosophy #Physics #Paradox #Nuance #Mindset

  19. "Der Sprung ins kühle Nass birgt jedoch gesundheitliche Risiken wie den Kälteschock oder Kreislaufprobleme. Dementsprechend hoch ist heuer bereits die Zahl tödlicher Badeunfälle. In diesem Jahr kamen bereits 25 Menschen ums Leben."

    #hitzetote #paradox

    nachrichten.at/panorama/chroni

  20. "Der Sprung ins kühle Nass birgt jedoch gesundheitliche Risiken wie den Kälteschock oder Kreislaufprobleme. Dementsprechend hoch ist heuer bereits die Zahl tödlicher Badeunfälle. In diesem Jahr kamen bereits 25 Menschen ums Leben."

    #hitzetote #paradox

    nachrichten.at/panorama/chroni

  21. The Exhaustion of #Responsibility

    #Humanity suffers from a peculiar #paradox.

    We largely agree on many of the world's biggest problems. We know that extreme inequality destabilizes societies. We know that women should live free from violence. We know that climate change threatens ecosystems, economies and ultimately human civilization itself.

    Yet knowledge rarely translates into action.

    The reason may be surprisingly simple: meaningful change demands effort. It requires people to question habits, surrender privileges, consume less, participate politically and critically examine their own behavior. These are cognitively and emotionally costly activities. Humans tend to avoid such costs whenever possible.

    Instead, we prefer narratives that reassure us. We support leaders who promise that difficult problems have painless solutions or that no real changes are necessary at all. Shared self-deception becomes socially acceptable because it reduces feelings of guilt. It is easier to maintain comforting illusions when millions of others do the same.

    This contradiction is deeply human. Most people value animal welfare while contributing to industries that harm animals. Most people support environmental protection while maintaining lifestyles that increase emissions. Most people favor democratic principles while investing little time in democratic participation.

    The problem is therefore not hypocrisy in the moral sense. It is inertia.

    Democracy, social justice and sustainability require continuous engagement. They depend on citizens who are willing to think, learn, vote, organize and sometimes accept personal inconvenience. Freedom itself imposes obligations, and obligations are tiring.

    Powerful individuals and institutions possess influence, but their power ultimately depends on public consent, indifference or passivity. Societies are not shaped solely by elites. They are shaped by millions of ordinary decisions made every day.

    Human beings are capable of remarkable achievements. We eradicate diseases, build scientific instruments that reach distant planets and create systems of unprecedented cooperation. We are equally capable of ignoring foreseeable risks.

    The central question is therefore not whether humanity understands its challenges.

    It is whether humanity is willing to accept the discomfort that comes with addressing them.

    Knowing what is right has never been enough.

    Civilizations are ultimately defined by what they are prepared to do, not by what they merely acknowledge.

    #civilization #future #logic #ethics #philosophy #democracy #environment #climate #change #society #protest #resistance #problem #politics #worldorder

  22. > Chinese: wǒ bú huì shuō zhōnɡ wén.
    > Japanese: nihongo ga dekimasen.
    > German: Ich spreche nicht Deutsch.
    > Spanish: No hablo español.

    — A curated list of examples of the liar's paradox adjacent sentence "I do not speak [this language]" by mathematician Joel David Hamkins

    Chinese is SVO much like English, so wǒ, huì shuō, zhōnɡ wén are meant to stand for I, speak, Chinese with (不,bú) being the negation of “no/not.”

    Indeed, 「我不會說中文。」is the output of Google Translate when you ask for a translation of “I do not speak Chinese.” Personally, I find 中文 easier to write than to communicate orally in isolation. Because Chinese is properly written with a brush, it is not the shape of the letters but the high-dimensional space of brush movements that connects the printed, semi-cursive, and full-cursive forms, so stroke order is vitally important.

    Chinese is a pitched language which means the rising and falling of the tone of each syllable is vital to spoken communication. Mandarin here has four main syllabic pitches: high, falling, rising, and falling and then rising. Thus the markers on the vowels are pitch marks, not stress accents.

    But there are a lot of different characters. So there are same-tone homophones like 財 (fortune, wealth, assets) and 才 (talents). The right side of the first character resembles the second — not a coincidence, but also not a reliable predictor of pronunciation.

    Due to cultural norms, 我愛你。(wǒ ài nǐ, I love you), while a perfectly grammatical sentence is culturally unacceptable to speak aloud to someone in public. Thus in Chinese it is possible to speak something perfectly but also completely wrong. ⇒⇐

    Therefore, Chinese does not exist. □

    Q.E.D. #Math #Paradox #Chinese