home.social

#eucommission — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #eucommission, aggregated by home.social.

  1. If I were king of the world I'd obligate all house owners to connect their houses with the sewer system: cold air for free.

    (obviously with a filter on top for the smell and hygene)

    The solution is already here. We just need to adapt it. This wil save TONS of energy, seeing how Aircos use up to 800w per house and only add MORE to climate change. It's something we really can't afford.

    #paris #heatwave #eucommission

  2. If I were king of the world I'd obligate all house owners to connect their houses with the sewer system: cold air for free.

    (obviously with a filter on top for the smell and hygene)

    The solution is already here. We just need to adapt it. This wil save TONS of energy, seeing how Aircos use up to 800w per house and only add MORE to climate change. It's something we really can't afford.

    #paris #heatwave #eucommission

  3. If I were king of the world I'd obligate all house owners to connect their houses with the sewer system: cold air for free.

    (obviously with a filter on top for the smell and hygene)

    The solution is already here. We just need to adapt it. This wil save TONS of energy, seeing how Aircos use up to 800w per house and only add MORE to climate change. It's something we really can't afford.

    #paris #heatwave #eucommission

  4. If I were king of the world I'd obligate all house owners to connect their houses with the sewer system: cold air for free.

    (obviously with a filter on top for the smell and hygene)

    The solution is already here. We just need to adapt it. This wil save TONS of energy, seeing how Aircos use up to 800w per house and only add MORE to climate change. It's something we really can't afford.

    #paris #heatwave #eucommission

  5. If I were king of the world I'd obligate all house owners to connect their houses with the sewer system: cold air for free.

    (obviously with a filter on top for the smell and hygene)

    The solution is already here. We just need to adapt it. This wil save TONS of energy, seeing how Aircos use up to 800w per house and only add MORE to climate change. It's something we really can't afford.

    #paris #heatwave #eucommission

  6. Want an update on the Weekend at Bernie’s clown show that is W Social? No? Me neither, but here we are…

    So before we start, let’s recount the whole dystopian raison d’être of these Davosian clowns: to be a EU®opean “alternative to X” that ­– cue the 1984 theme tune – verifies your identity to ensure that only “real people” are on it (real is what your government says it is).

    Now, let’s fast forward to last week, when TikTok set up an account on W Social.

    That’s nice, isn’t it? One surveillance capitalist lending their support to another? Kumbaya and all that. The only problem? (spoiler alert), it wasn’t TikTok. (Shocking, I know.)

    The account, Identity Verified™ by EU X – sorry, W Social, was a spam account and immediately labelled as such by BlueSky moderators. (Don’t you love a “decentralised” system where a post on an EU server, accessed from another EU server, is moderated by our benevolent Big Brother in Trumpland, by the way? I know it just warms the cockles of my heart. So much sovereignty! But I digress…)

    So @_elena calls them out (someone has to while @EUCommission is busy preparing for their honeymoon after expressing their undying devotion to W Social recently on every social platform¹):

    mu.social/profile/elenarossini

    Anna Zeiter – W CEO, Stanford’s own, and ex-eBay executive (such sovereignty) – replies with this absolute zinger:

    > “We are just verifying if some [sic] is a human and at least 18 years old. Users are then free to choose their own user name. This (human) user apparently chose the name TikTok.“ (mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial)

    Read that as many times as you like until it really sinks in.

    These incompetent clowns (dangerous competent clowns but incompetent clowns nevertheless) make people go through a ridiculous 13-step identity verification stage² and then… umm… you get to choose whatever identity you want.

    🤡🤡🤡

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re incompetent. It would be worse if they were competent, given they’re a closed-source venture-capital-funded startup determined to prove your identity.

    > “Yes we have a business model, it’s not a philanthropy, we are not a B corp, we actually want to make money.” – Anna Zeiter³

    But, what I want to know is this: Why has @EUCommission embraced a proprietary, closed-source, corporate ghost town with 14,300 accounts, 90% of which have not posted even once (in other words, with only 1,259 accounts that have ever posted)⁴ when there is a thriving non-corporate fediverse with millions of active people on it.

    Could it have anything to do with identity verification, surveillance, and control?

    And if so, why can’t they even get that right?

    Looking forward to seeing how long @EUCommission can drag the corpse of W Social around before people realise it’s dead.

    Oh, and how does this make the whole “European alternatives” thing look? Not good. Not because there aren’t excellent European alternatives but because the folks at the commission are either too clueless or too corrupt to recognise and support them.

    So, yeah, how’s your Monday going?

    ¹ e.g., mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116770333, etc.

    ² aseachange.com/@elena/statuses

    ³ blog.elenarossini.com/the-unto (from the YouTube video that they since deleted. Nice transparency there, clowns.)

    ⁴ Run this script in Node 18+ to reproduce the numbers from their PDS yourself: codeberg.org/aral/gists/src/br Also see blog.elenarossini.com/w-social and blog.elenarossini.com/w-social

    #WSocial #EU #sovereignty #socialMedia #socialNetworking #mastodon #fediverse #activityPub #ATProto #startups #EUCommission

  7. Want an update on the Weekend at Bernie’s clown show that is W Social? No? Me neither, but here we are…

    So before we start, let’s recount the whole dystopian raison d’être of these Davosian clowns: to be a EU®opean “alternative to X” that ­– cue the 1984 theme tune – verifies your identity to ensure that only “real people” are on it (real is what your government says it is).

    Now, let’s fast forward to last week, when TikTok set up an account on W Social.

    That’s nice, isn’t it? One surveillance capitalist lending their support to another? Kumbaya and all that. The only problem? (spoiler alert), it wasn’t TikTok. (Shocking, I know.)

    The account, Identity Verified™ by EU X – sorry, W Social, was a spam account and immediately labelled as such by BlueSky moderators. (Don’t you love a “decentralised” system where a post on an EU server, accessed from another EU server, is moderated by our benevolent Big Brother in Trumpland, by the way? I know it just warms the cockles of my heart. So much sovereignty! But I digress…)

    So @_elena calls them out (someone has to while @EUCommission is busy preparing for their honeymoon after expressing their undying devotion to W Social recently on every social platform¹):

    mu.social/profile/elenarossini

    Anna Zeiter – W CEO, Stanford’s own, and ex-eBay executive (such sovereignty) – replies with this absolute zinger:

    > “We are just verifying if some [sic] is a human and at least 18 years old. Users are then free to choose their own user name. This (human) user apparently chose the name TikTok.“ (mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial)

    Read that as many times as you like until it really sinks in.

    These incompetent clowns (dangerous competent clowns but incompetent clowns nevertheless) make people go through a ridiculous 13-step identity verification stage² and then… umm… you get to choose whatever identity you want.

    🤡🤡🤡

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re incompetent. It would be worse if they were competent, given they’re a closed-source venture-capital-funded startup determined to prove your identity.

    > “Yes we have a business model, it’s not a philanthropy, we are not a B corp, we actually want to make money.” – Anna Zeiter³

    But, what I want to know is this: Why has @EUCommission embraced a proprietary, closed-source, corporate ghost town with 14,300 accounts, 90% of which have not posted even once (in other words, with only 1,259 accounts that have ever posted)⁴ when there is a thriving non-corporate fediverse with millions of active people on it.

    Could it have anything to do with identity verification, surveillance, and control?

    And if so, why can’t they even get that right?

    Looking forward to seeing how long @EUCommission can drag the corpse of W Social around before people realise it’s dead.

    Oh, and how does this make the whole “European alternatives” thing look? Not good. Not because there aren’t excellent European alternatives but because the folks at the commission are either too clueless or too corrupt to recognise and support them.

    So, yeah, how’s your Monday going?

    ¹ e.g., mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116770333, etc.

    ² aseachange.com/@elena/statuses

    ³ blog.elenarossini.com/the-unto (from the YouTube video that they since deleted. Nice transparency there, clowns.)

    ⁴ Run this script in Node 18+ to reproduce the numbers from their PDS yourself: codeberg.org/aral/gists/src/br Also see blog.elenarossini.com/w-social and blog.elenarossini.com/w-social

    #WSocial #EU #sovereignty #socialMedia #socialNetworking #mastodon #fediverse #activityPub #ATProto #startups #EUCommission

  8. Want an update on the Weekend at Bernie’s clown show that is W Social? No? Me neither, but here we are…

    So before we start, let’s recount the whole dystopian raison d’être of these Davosian clowns: to be a EU®opean “alternative to X” that ­– cue the 1984 theme tune – verifies your identity to ensure that only “real people” are on it (real is what your government says it is).

    Now, let’s fast forward to last week, when TikTok set up an account on W Social.

    That’s nice, isn’t it? One surveillance capitalist lending their support to another? Kumbaya and all that. The only problem? (spoiler alert), it wasn’t TikTok. (Shocking, I know.)

    The account, Identity Verified™ by EU X – sorry, W Social, was a spam account and immediately labelled as such by BlueSky moderators. (Don’t you love a “decentralised” system where a post on an EU server, accessed from another EU server, is moderated by our benevolent Big Brother in Trumpland, by the way? I know it just warms the cockles of my heart. So much sovereignty! But I digress…)

    So @_elena calls them out (someone has to while @EUCommission is busy preparing for their honeymoon after expressing their undying devotion to W Social recently on every social platform¹):

    mu.social/profile/elenarossini

    Anna Zeiter – W CEO, Stanford’s own, and ex-eBay executive (such sovereignty) – replies with this absolute zinger:

    > “We are just verifying if some [sic] is a human and at least 18 years old. Users are then free to choose their own user name. This (human) user apparently chose the name TikTok.“ (mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial)

    Read that as many times as you like until it really sinks in.

    These incompetent clowns (dangerous competent clowns but incompetent clowns nevertheless) make people go through a ridiculous 13-step identity verification stage² and then… umm… you get to choose whatever identity you want.

    🤡🤡🤡

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re incompetent. It would be worse if they were competent, given they’re a closed-source venture-capital-funded startup determined to prove your identity.

    > “Yes we have a business model, it’s not a philanthropy, we are not a B corp, we actually want to make money.” – Anna Zeiter³

    But, what I want to know is this: Why has @EUCommission embraced a proprietary, closed-source, corporate ghost town with 14,300 accounts, 90% of which have not posted even once (in other words, with only 1,259 accounts that have ever posted)⁴ when there is a thriving non-corporate fediverse with millions of active people on it.

    Could it have anything to do with identity verification, surveillance, and control?

    And if so, why can’t they even get that right?

    Looking forward to seeing how long @EUCommission can drag the corpse of W Social around before people realise it’s dead.

    Oh, and how does this make the whole “European alternatives” thing look? Not good. Not because there aren’t excellent European alternatives but because the folks at the commission are either too clueless or too corrupt to recognise and support them.

    So, yeah, how’s your Monday going?

    ¹ e.g., mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116770333, etc.

    ² aseachange.com/@elena/statuses

    ³ blog.elenarossini.com/the-unto (from the YouTube video that they since deleted. Nice transparency there, clowns.)

    ⁴ Run this script in Node 18+ to reproduce the numbers from their PDS yourself: codeberg.org/aral/gists/src/br Also see blog.elenarossini.com/w-social and blog.elenarossini.com/w-social

    #WSocial #EU #sovereignty #socialMedia #socialNetworking #mastodon #fediverse #activityPub #ATProto #startups #EUCommission

  9. Want an update on the Weekend at Bernie’s clown show that is W Social? No? Me neither, but here we are…

    So before we start, let’s recount the whole dystopian raison d’être of these Davosian clowns: to be a EU®opean “alternative to X” that ­– cue the 1984 theme tune – verifies your identity to ensure that only “real people” are on it (real is what your government says it is).

    Now, let’s fast forward to last week, when TikTok set up an account on W Social.

    That’s nice, isn’t it? One surveillance capitalist lending their support to another? Kumbaya and all that. The only problem? (spoiler alert), it wasn’t TikTok. (Shocking, I know.)

    The account, Identity Verified™ by EU X – sorry, W Social, was a spam account and immediately labelled as such by BlueSky moderators. (Don’t you love a “decentralised” system where a post on an EU server, accessed from another EU server, is moderated by our benevolent Big Brother in Trumpland, by the way? I know it just warms the cockles of my heart. So much sovereignty! But I digress…)

    So @_elena calls them out (someone has to while @EUCommission is busy preparing for their honeymoon after expressing their undying devotion to W Social recently on every social platform¹):

    mu.social/profile/elenarossini

    Anna Zeiter – W CEO, Stanford’s own, and ex-eBay executive (such sovereignty) – replies with this absolute zinger:

    > “We are just verifying if some [sic] is a human and at least 18 years old. Users are then free to choose their own user name. This (human) user apparently chose the name TikTok.“ (mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial)

    Read that as many times as you like until it really sinks in.

    These incompetent clowns (dangerous competent clowns but incompetent clowns nevertheless) make people go through a ridiculous 13-step identity verification stage² and then… umm… you get to choose whatever identity you want.

    🤡🤡🤡

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re incompetent. It would be worse if they were competent, given they’re a closed-source venture-capital-funded startup determined to prove your identity.

    > “Yes we have a business model, it’s not a philanthropy, we are not a B corp, we actually want to make money.” – Anna Zeiter³

    But, what I want to know is this: Why has @EUCommission embraced a proprietary, closed-source, corporate ghost town with 14,300 accounts, 90% of which have not posted even once (in other words, with only 1,259 accounts that have ever posted)⁴ when there is a thriving non-corporate fediverse with millions of active people on it.

    Could it have anything to do with identity verification, surveillance, and control?

    And if so, why can’t they even get that right?

    Looking forward to seeing how long @EUCommission can drag the corpse of W Social around before people realise it’s dead.

    Oh, and how does this make the whole “European alternatives” thing look? Not good. Not because there aren’t excellent European alternatives but because the folks at the commission are either too clueless or too corrupt to recognise and support them.

    So, yeah, how’s your Monday going?

    ¹ e.g., mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116770333, etc.

    ² aseachange.com/@elena/statuses

    ³ blog.elenarossini.com/the-unto (from the YouTube video that they since deleted. Nice transparency there, clowns.)

    ⁴ Run this script in Node 18+ to reproduce the numbers from their PDS yourself: codeberg.org/aral/gists/src/br Also see blog.elenarossini.com/w-social and blog.elenarossini.com/w-social

    #WSocial #EU #sovereignty #socialMedia #socialNetworking #mastodon #fediverse #activityPub #ATProto #startups #EUCommission

  10. Want an update on the Weekend at Bernie’s clown show that is W Social? No? Me neither, but here we are…

    So before we start, let’s recount the whole dystopian raison d’être of these Davosian clowns: to be a EU®opean “alternative to X” that ­– cue the 1984 theme tune – verifies your identity to ensure that only “real people” are on it (real is what your government says it is).

    Now, let’s fast forward to last week, when TikTok set up an account on W Social.

    That’s nice, isn’t it? One surveillance capitalist lending their support to another? Kumbaya and all that. The only problem? (spoiler alert), it wasn’t TikTok. (Shocking, I know.)

    The account, Identity Verified™ by EU X – sorry, W Social, was a spam account and immediately labelled as such by BlueSky moderators. (Don’t you love a “decentralised” system where a post on an EU server, accessed from another EU server, is moderated by our benevolent Big Brother in Trumpland, by the way? I know it just warms the cockles of my heart. So much sovereignty! But I digress…)

    So @_elena calls them out (someone has to while @EUCommission is busy preparing for their honeymoon after expressing their undying devotion to W Social recently on every social platform¹):

    mu.social/profile/elenarossini

    Anna Zeiter – W CEO, Stanford’s own, and ex-eBay executive (such sovereignty) – replies with this absolute zinger:

    > “We are just verifying if some [sic] is a human and at least 18 years old. Users are then free to choose their own user name. This (human) user apparently chose the name TikTok.“ (mu.social/profile/anna.wsocial)

    Read that as many times as you like until it really sinks in.

    These incompetent clowns (dangerous competent clowns but incompetent clowns nevertheless) make people go through a ridiculous 13-step identity verification stage² and then… umm… you get to choose whatever identity you want.

    🤡🤡🤡

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re incompetent. It would be worse if they were competent, given they’re a closed-source venture-capital-funded startup determined to prove your identity.

    > “Yes we have a business model, it’s not a philanthropy, we are not a B corp, we actually want to make money.” – Anna Zeiter³

    But, what I want to know is this: Why has @EUCommission embraced a proprietary, closed-source, corporate ghost town with 14,300 accounts, 90% of which have not posted even once (in other words, with only 1,259 accounts that have ever posted)⁴ when there is a thriving non-corporate fediverse with millions of active people on it.

    Could it have anything to do with identity verification, surveillance, and control?

    And if so, why can’t they even get that right?

    Looking forward to seeing how long @EUCommission can drag the corpse of W Social around before people realise it’s dead.

    Oh, and how does this make the whole “European alternatives” thing look? Not good. Not because there aren’t excellent European alternatives but because the folks at the commission are either too clueless or too corrupt to recognise and support them.

    So, yeah, how’s your Monday going?

    ¹ e.g., mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116770333, etc.

    ² aseachange.com/@elena/statuses

    ³ blog.elenarossini.com/the-unto (from the YouTube video that they since deleted. Nice transparency there, clowns.)

    ⁴ Run this script in Node 18+ to reproduce the numbers from their PDS yourself: codeberg.org/aral/gists/src/br Also see blog.elenarossini.com/w-social and blog.elenarossini.com/w-social

    #WSocial #EU #sovereignty #socialMedia #socialNetworking #mastodon #fediverse #activityPub #ATProto #startups #EUCommission

  11. Carbon Gap: The ETS Review Is A Landmark Opportunity To Kickstart CDR In EU

    As the EU prepares to publish a proposed review of its Emissions Trading System (ETS), Carbon Gap underlines…
    #Europe #EU #CarbonGap #carbonremovals #compliancecarbonmarkets #EUCDR #EUCommission #EUETS #EuropeanUnion
    europesays.com/europe/95749/

  12. The EU Commission announced new exemptions yesterday to its Batteries Regulation, which will soon require that portable batteries in products sold in the EU be removable and user-replaceable thurrott.com/hardware/338958/e #wearables #eucommission #technology

  13. The EU Commission announced new exemptions yesterday to its Batteries Regulation, which will soon require that portable batteries in products sold in the EU be removable and user-replaceable thurrott.com/hardware/338958/e #wearables #eucommission #technology

  14. The EU Commission announced new exemptions yesterday to its Batteries Regulation, which will soon require that portable batteries in products sold in the EU be removable and user-replaceable thurrott.com/hardware/338958/e #wearables #eucommission #technology

  15. The EU Commission announced new exemptions yesterday to its Batteries Regulation, which will soon require that portable batteries in products sold in the EU be removable and user-replaceable thurrott.com/hardware/338958/e #wearables #eucommission #technology

  16. The EU Commission announced new exemptions yesterday to its Batteries Regulation, which will soon require that portable batteries in products sold in the EU be removable and user-replaceable thurrott.com/hardware/338958/e #wearables #eucommission #technology

  17. 🇪🇺 On 7 July 2026, the #EUCommission presented the #ActionPlan on #Cybersecurity and #AI, aiming to supporting the use of responsible AI and cybersecurity resilience.

    Here's a quick overview.

    #Quantidal

  18. 🇪🇺 On 7 July 2026, the #EUCommission presented the #ActionPlan on #Cybersecurity and #AI, aiming to supporting the use of responsible AI and cybersecurity resilience.

    Here's a quick overview.

    #Quantidal

  19. 🇪🇺 On 7 July 2026, the #EUCommission presented the #ActionPlan on #Cybersecurity and #AI, aiming to supporting the use of responsible AI and cybersecurity resilience.

    Here's a quick overview.

    #Quantidal

  20. 🇪🇺 On 7 July 2026, the #EUCommission presented the #ActionPlan on #Cybersecurity and #AI, aiming to supporting the use of responsible AI and cybersecurity resilience.

    Here's a quick overview.

    #Quantidal

  21. EU Commission preliminarily finds Meta apps addictive

    This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our…
    #Europe #EU #addictivedesign #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #Facebook #Meta
    europesays.com/europe/92358/

  22. EU Commission objects to France’s planned social media ban

    The European Commission has told France that its proposed legislation banning children under 15 from using social media…
    #Europe #EU #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #France #socialmediaapps
    europesays.com/europe/89569/

  23. Rainbow Updates Its BioCCS Methodology To Align With The EU CRCF Framework

    European carbon registry Rainbow has revised and finalized its methodology for biomass carbon removal and storage (BioCCS) to…
    #Europe #EU #BioCCS #carbonregistry #CarbonRemovalsandCarbonFarming #CRCF #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #Rainbow
    europesays.com/europe/87409/

  24. EU Commission unveils five cross-border defence initiatives

    On July 3, 2026, the European Commission proposed five new large-scale European Defence Projects of Common Interest (EDPCIs)…
    #Europe #EU #cross-borderdefence #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #industrialprojects #militarysystems
    europesays.com/europe/85881/

  25. Google Loses Final Appeal Over $4.7 Billion EU Android Antitrust Fine

    Google’s Play Store logo is shown against a European flag – Steve Dent for Engadget Europe’s highest court…
    #Europe #EU #Androidoperatingsystem #Engadget #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #GeneralCourt #Google #Googleapps #GoogleSearch #SteveDent
    europesays.com/europe/84770/

  26. EU Commission launches antitrust investigation into Sanofi

    The logo of the French drug manufacturer Sanofi, taken during a general meeting of the pharmaceutical company. (is…
    #Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #antitrustinvestigation #AntitrustLaw #drugmanufacturer #EUCommission #EuropeanUnion #fluvaccine #Sanofi
    europesays.com/europe/81560/

  27. You reap what you sow….

    Maybe not today, but eventually the very people whose discretion and reliability you need 100% will turn against you.

    Instead of symbolically keeping the bottom seven floors running and earning 200% commitment in return, the people at the top thought: better to have 18 degrees today.

    #EUCommission #airco #Berlaymont

    politico.eu/article/eu-commiss