#palestinian — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #palestinian, aggregated by home.social.
-
🚨BREAKING : Massive fires erupted in tents sheltering displaced Palestinian families after a violent Israeli airstrike struck Namaa camp, northwest of Khan Younis in southern Gaza.
Multiple casualties and injuries have been reported.
-
⚠️Sensitive Content ⚠️
🚨BREAKING: A 10 year old Palestinian child is fighting for his life after surviving an Israeli airstrike that killed his father in Gaza, He suffered severe facial injuries and a critical brain injury.
Documented by Dr. Jamal Salha - Gaza
-
Israeli settlers storm Masafer Yatta, and assault a Palestinian woman and child.
-
Israeli settlers storm Masafer Yatta, and assault a Palestinian woman and child.
-
Israeli settlers storm Masafer Yatta, and assault a Palestinian woman and child.
-
Israeli settlers storm Masafer Yatta, and assault a Palestinian woman and child.
-
Israeli settlers storm Masafer Yatta, and assault a Palestinian woman and child.
-
Israeli occupation forces assault Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem.
-
Israeli occupation forces assault Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem.
-
Israeli occupation forces assault Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem.
-
Israeli occupation forces assault Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem.
-
Israeli occupation forces assault Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem.
-
All the trustworthy news & analysis on #Israel’s ongoing #PalestinianGenocide in Gaza & the West Bank - and the heroic #Palestinian #resistance - that you won’t get from the genocide-enabling #Vichy #MSM, including the #Zionist-run #BBC! Now also including Day 89 of the #US/ Israel #OperationEpsteinFury vs Iran & the “Israeli” invasion of #Lebanon!
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/#
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@iran
@BBC5Live
@BBCRadio4
@BBCNews
@AlJazeera#Press #SocialMedia #Gaza #PalestinianGenocide #Zionism #SettlerColonialism #Resistance #DismantleZionism #DecolonizePalestine #GlobaliseTheIntifada #Iran #War #Trump #Israel #Lebanon #Hezbollah
-
🚨BREAKING: A Palestinian girl in Gaza wore her orange Eid dress, waiting to celebrate Eid al-Adha with her family. Minutes later, an Israeli missile struck their building, killing them all.
10 Palestinians were killed and dozens of neighbors injured in the massacre.
-
🚨 A horrific massacre in Gaza: Five children were among 10 Palestinians killed after an Israeli strike targeted a residential building on Omar Al-Mukhtar Street in Gaza.
The victims:
• Israa Emad Salim, 17
• Sidra Iyad Azzam, 12
• Sarah Sameh Rajab, 9
• Nour Ahmad Abu Halima, 12
• Yamen Ahmad Abu Halima, 13
• Emad Hassan Salim
• Ahmad Abdel Wahab Abu Halima, 43
• Shaimaa Khalil Shaaban Al-Suweirki, 28
• Ihsan Matar Balbul, 81
• Ataf Sobhi Balbul, 47
-
The #TrumpRegime re-imposed sanctions against #FrancescaAlbanese who was appointed by #UN #HumanRightsCouncil to monitor #humanrights in the #Palestinian territories #occupied by #Israel since 1967, including #Gaza, the #WestBank, #EastJerusalem, & the #GolanHeights.
This comes 2 weeks after a #federaljudge had temporarily #blocked US sanctions against her for criticizing Israel’s war on Gaza, calling it a likely violation of her #freespeech rights.
-
The #TrumpRegime re-imposed sanctions against #FrancescaAlbanese who was appointed by #UN #HumanRightsCouncil to monitor #humanrights in the #Palestinian territories #occupied by #Israel since 1967, including #Gaza, the #WestBank, #EastJerusalem, & the #GolanHeights.
This comes 2 weeks after a #federaljudge had temporarily #blocked US sanctions against her for criticizing Israel’s war on Gaza, calling it a likely violation of her #freespeech rights.
-
The #TrumpRegime re-imposed sanctions against #FrancescaAlbanese who was appointed by #UN #HumanRightsCouncil to monitor #humanrights in the #Palestinian territories #occupied by #Israel since 1967, including #Gaza, the #WestBank, #EastJerusalem, & the #GolanHeights.
This comes 2 weeks after a #federaljudge had temporarily #blocked US sanctions against her for criticizing Israel’s war on Gaza, calling it a likely violation of her #freespeech rights.
-
The #TrumpRegime re-imposed sanctions against #FrancescaAlbanese who was appointed by #UN #HumanRightsCouncil to monitor #humanrights in the #Palestinian territories #occupied by #Israel since 1967, including #Gaza, the #WestBank, #EastJerusalem, & the #GolanHeights.
This comes 2 weeks after a #federaljudge had temporarily #blocked US sanctions against her for criticizing Israel’s war on Gaza, calling it a likely violation of her #freespeech rights.
-
The #TrumpRegime re-imposed sanctions against #FrancescaAlbanese who was appointed by #UN #HumanRightsCouncil to monitor #humanrights in the #Palestinian territories #occupied by #Israel since 1967, including #Gaza, the #WestBank, #EastJerusalem, & the #GolanHeights.
This comes 2 weeks after a #federaljudge had temporarily #blocked US sanctions against her for criticizing Israel’s war on Gaza, calling it a likely violation of her #freespeech rights.
-
Israeli colonizers raised the occupation flags along a Palestinian road connecting the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, in the latest attack in a series of settler assaults targeting Palestinians across the occupied West Bank.
-
Israeli colonizers raised the occupation flags along a Palestinian road connecting the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, in the latest attack in a series of settler assaults targeting Palestinians across the occupied West Bank.
-
Israeli colonizers raised the occupation flags along a Palestinian road connecting the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, in the latest attack in a series of settler assaults targeting Palestinians across the occupied West Bank.
-
Israeli colonizers raised the occupation flags along a Palestinian road connecting the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, in the latest attack in a series of settler assaults targeting Palestinians across the occupied West Bank.
-
Israeli colonizers raised the occupation flags along a Palestinian road connecting the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, in the latest attack in a series of settler assaults targeting Palestinians across the occupied West Bank.
-
Pro-#Palestinian activist acquitted of funding #Hamas in #Dutch terrorism trial @palestine
#press
https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/27/pro-palestinian-activist-acquitted-funding-hamas-dutch-terrorism-trial -
Pro-#Palestinian activist acquitted of funding #Hamas in #Dutch terrorism trial @palestine
#press
https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/27/pro-palestinian-activist-acquitted-funding-hamas-dutch-terrorism-trial -
Pro-#Palestinian activist acquitted of funding #Hamas in #Dutch terrorism trial @palestine
#press
https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/27/pro-palestinian-activist-acquitted-funding-hamas-dutch-terrorism-trial -
Pro-#Palestinian activist acquitted of funding #Hamas in #Dutch terrorism trial @palestine
#press
https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/27/pro-palestinian-activist-acquitted-funding-hamas-dutch-terrorism-trial -
⚡An #Israeli 🇮🇱 airstrike targeted the Rashidiyeh #Palestinian 🇵🇸 refugee camp in southern #Lebanon 🇱🇧. [WarFront Witness]
Follow for confirmed updates
-
⚡An #Israeli 🇮🇱 airstrike targeted the Rashidiyeh #Palestinian 🇵🇸 refugee camp in southern #Lebanon 🇱🇧. [WarFront Witness]
Follow for confirmed updates
-
⚡An #Israeli 🇮🇱 airstrike targeted the Rashidiyeh #Palestinian 🇵🇸 refugee camp in southern #Lebanon 🇱🇧. [WarFront Witness]
Follow for confirmed updates
-
⚡An #Israeli 🇮🇱 airstrike targeted the Rashidiyeh #Palestinian 🇵🇸 refugee camp in southern #Lebanon 🇱🇧. [WarFront Witness]
Follow for confirmed updates
-
NEW | Billions pledged for Gaza reconstruction remain frozen as no aid reaches the devastated Strip
A Financial Times report revealed that the World Bank fund established for Trump’s so called “Board of Peace” has received zero donor funding four months after its launch, despite billions pledged for postwar Gaza relief.
According to the report, not a single U.S. dollar has been deployed for Gaza’s reconstruction while Palestinians continue living under genocide, destruction, and mass displacement.
The UAE’s $100 million program to train a Gaza police force remains frozen, while Morocco’s contribution reportedly went toward administrative offices and salaries rather than rebuilding the devastated Strip.
Although member states pledged $7 billion and Trump promised an additional $10 billion for Gaza, the report says no reconstruction contracts have been awarded and no rebuilding process has actually begun.
-
NEW | Billions pledged for Gaza reconstruction remain frozen as no aid reaches the devastated Strip
A Financial Times report revealed that the World Bank fund established for Trump’s so called “Board of Peace” has received zero donor funding four months after its launch, despite billions pledged for postwar Gaza relief.
According to the report, not a single U.S. dollar has been deployed for Gaza’s reconstruction while Palestinians continue living under genocide, destruction, and mass displacement.
The UAE’s $100 million program to train a Gaza police force remains frozen, while Morocco’s contribution reportedly went toward administrative offices and salaries rather than rebuilding the devastated Strip.
Although member states pledged $7 billion and Trump promised an additional $10 billion for Gaza, the report says no reconstruction contracts have been awarded and no rebuilding process has actually begun.
-
NEW | Billions pledged for Gaza reconstruction remain frozen as no aid reaches the devastated Strip
A Financial Times report revealed that the World Bank fund established for Trump’s so called “Board of Peace” has received zero donor funding four months after its launch, despite billions pledged for postwar Gaza relief.
According to the report, not a single U.S. dollar has been deployed for Gaza’s reconstruction while Palestinians continue living under genocide, destruction, and mass displacement.
The UAE’s $100 million program to train a Gaza police force remains frozen, while Morocco’s contribution reportedly went toward administrative offices and salaries rather than rebuilding the devastated Strip.
Although member states pledged $7 billion and Trump promised an additional $10 billion for Gaza, the report says no reconstruction contracts have been awarded and no rebuilding process has actually begun.
-
NEW | Billions pledged for Gaza reconstruction remain frozen as no aid reaches the devastated Strip
A Financial Times report revealed that the World Bank fund established for Trump’s so called “Board of Peace” has received zero donor funding four months after its launch, despite billions pledged for postwar Gaza relief.
According to the report, not a single U.S. dollar has been deployed for Gaza’s reconstruction while Palestinians continue living under genocide, destruction, and mass displacement.
The UAE’s $100 million program to train a Gaza police force remains frozen, while Morocco’s contribution reportedly went toward administrative offices and salaries rather than rebuilding the devastated Strip.
Although member states pledged $7 billion and Trump promised an additional $10 billion for Gaza, the report says no reconstruction contracts have been awarded and no rebuilding process has actually begun.
-
NEW | Billions pledged for Gaza reconstruction remain frozen as no aid reaches the devastated Strip
A Financial Times report revealed that the World Bank fund established for Trump’s so called “Board of Peace” has received zero donor funding four months after its launch, despite billions pledged for postwar Gaza relief.
According to the report, not a single U.S. dollar has been deployed for Gaza’s reconstruction while Palestinians continue living under genocide, destruction, and mass displacement.
The UAE’s $100 million program to train a Gaza police force remains frozen, while Morocco’s contribution reportedly went toward administrative offices and salaries rather than rebuilding the devastated Strip.
Although member states pledged $7 billion and Trump promised an additional $10 billion for Gaza, the report says no reconstruction contracts have been awarded and no rebuilding process has actually begun.
-
The difference between rationalising and reasoning, and why it’s futile to argue on social media
It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.
– Jonathan Swift (attributed)Here’s the thing! I’m about to advise you not to do something I have been regularly indulging in. Having lots of time at my disposal, I developed an admittedly nasty penchant for responding to the blatant bigotry in the comments sections of various social media platforms.
You can hate me later, but first let me tell you why I’ve decided to come clean about it. It’s not just the barefaced ignorance of recorded history, wilful misunderstanding and perversion of current events, debasement of civil norms, disingenuity, and rank hypocrisy of the social commentators. Worse, it’s the (mis)appropriation of divine authority (why is it almost always the Christians?), and the sheer inhumanity, entitlement, and complete lack of awareness that incenses me.
I have, unfortunately, developed a habit of making screen prints on my mobile device of exchanges with complete strangers on social media because of the distasteful practice of some who, having been called out or chastised, delete their comments. Here is an example of just one such comment made in response to an article by a local online newspaper, bemoaning the bombing of Palestinian schoolchildren in Gaza:
There were so many others, most excusing or justifying the Israeli bombing, closing ranks around the depraved Israeli soldiers and nation, while cold-heartedly ignoring the object of the article itself. My comment, as it usually does, generated a heap of nasty responses and, of course, the obligatory insults.
Of course, my antagonist had to double down on his position when I challenged both his insult and his uneducated approach to reasoning.
My parting response remains unanswered. Maybe he finally figured it out, but perhaps that’s too much to hope for. The subtleties of the English language were furthest from Paul’s mind. Paul’s intention was to ridicule, insult and score brownie points with like-minded online commentators who frequently use laugh emojis among others to buttress their argument, or lack of it.
While I’m not particularly proud of my final response, it does lead to the main reason for this post. It’s not the first time I’ve encountered someone who does not understand the difference between reasoning and rationalising.
Reasoning is the objective process of using logic and evidence to discover the truth. Rationalising, however, is a psychological defense mechanism where you start with a preconceived conclusion or emotional bias, and work backward to invent superficially plausible justifications to defend it.
Paul had already rationalised his support for Israel and their military campaign in Gaza. He had convinced himself that his rationalisations were sound. Arguing with him online was bound to fail. Writing in the Blog of the American Philosophical Association, Isaac Wiegman provides reasons why arguments almost never work.
Wiegman writes about our inclination for defensiveness and motivated reasoning, and draws on The Scout Mindset, a book by Julia Galef, who hosted Rationally Speaking, a podcast I used to follow more than a decade ago, before podcasts became so widely popular. Julia distinguishes between thoughtful reasoning, which she calls the Scout Mindset and motivated reasoning, which she calls Soldier Mindset. She outlines six broad categories that a soldier mindset defends as follows:
Comfort: We shield ourselves from unpleasant emotions. If you have invested time and energy in convincing yourself and others of something (e.g., that the earth is flat or not, that global warming is a threat or not, that abortion is okay or not), you will avoid evidence to the contrary because you want to avoid the shame, embarrassment, or dissonance that would go along with admitting you were wrong.
Self-esteem: We enhance or protect our self-image. If you are wealthy, you might ignore or discount evidence of systemic injustice or inequality. At some level, you want to maintain the belief that you earned what you got within a just and equitable system. If you are relatively poor, you’ll think the opposite and blame bad luck for your setbacks.
Morale: We fight to preserve our motivations and expectations. If you are committed to a new business idea, you might avoid evidence that it could fail. You want to protect your motivation to give it your best shot, holding on to your expectation that your hard work will pay off.
Persuasion: We defend our ability to convince others. If you’re in the middle of a messy divorce or court battle, you might fiercely deny your adversary’s claims, however reasonable. You want to stay convinced of the righteousness of your cause so that you can be convincing to others.
Image: We shield our reputation. If someone accuses you of plagiarism, you may look for all kinds of reasons why your uncited use of a source was excusable. As in the case of René Diekstra.
Belonging: We protect our place of belonging in social groups. If your belief in God is required for membership and belonging in a community of faith (or required to keep your job in it), then you may tend to avoid evidence that God might not exist.
Given the outlined futility of unstructured online argumentation, it remains to be seen whether I will, in the future, resist the urge to engage with those who demonstrate blatant bigotry. The mindfulness required could well be the deterrent.
#BlogOfTheAmericanPhilosophicalAssociation #Gaza #IsaacWiegman #JonathanSwift #JuliaGalef #Palestinian #rationalising #reasoning #soldierMindset #TheScoutMindset -
The difference between rationalising and reasoning, and why it’s futile to argue on social media
It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.
– Jonathan Swift (atttibuted)Here’s the thing! I’m about to advise you not to do something I have been regularly indulging in. Having lots of time at my disposal, I developed an admittedly nasty penchant for responding to the blatant bigotry in the comments sections of various social media platforms.
You can hate me later, but first let me tell you why I’ve decided to come clean about it. It’s not just the barefaced ignorance of recorded history, wilful misunderstanding and perversion of current events, debasement of civil norms, disingenuity, and rank hypocrisy of the social commentators. Worse, it’s the (mis)appropriation of divine authority (why is it almost always the Christians?), and the sheer inhumanity, entitlement, and complete lack of awareness that incenses me.
I have, unfortunately, developed a habit of making screen prints on my mobile device of exchanges with complete strangers on social media because of the distasteful practice of some who, having been called out or chastised, delete their comments. Here is an example of just one such comment made in response to an article by a local online newspaper, bemoaning the bombing of Palestinian schoolchildren in Gaza:
There were so many others, most excusing or justifying the Israeli bombing, closing ranks around the depraved Israeli soldiers and nation, while cold-heartedly ignoring the object of the article itself. My comment, as it usually does, generated a heap of nasty responses and, of course, the obligatory insults.
Of course, my antagonist had to double down on his position when I challenged both his insult and his uneducated approach to reasoning.
My parting response remains unanswered. Maybe he finally figured it out, but perhaps that’s too much to hope for. The subtleties of the English language were furthest from Paul’s mind. Paul’s intention was to ridicule, insult and score brownie points with like-minded online commentators who frequently use laugh emojis among others to buttress their argument, or lack of it.
While I’m not particularly proud of my final response, it does lead to the main reason for this post. It’s not the first time I’ve encountered someone who does not understand the difference between reasoning and rationalising.
Reasoning is the objective process of using logic and evidence to discover the truth. Rationalising, however, is a psychological defense mechanism where you start with a preconceived conclusion or emotional bias, and work backward to invent superficially plausible justifications to defend it.
Paul had already rationalised his support for Israel and their military campaign in Gaza. He had convinced himself that his rationalisations were sound. Arguing with him online was bound to fail. Writing in the Blog of the American Philosophical Association, Isaac Wiegman provides reasons why arguments almost never work.
Wiegman writes about our inclination for defensiveness and motivated reasoning, and draws on The Scout Mindset, a book by Julia Galef, who hosted Rationally Speaking, a podcast I used to follow more than a decade ago, before podcasts became so widely popular. Julia distinguishes between thoughtful reasoning, which she calls the Scout Mindset and motivated reasoning, which she calls Soldier Mindset. She outlines six broad categories that a soldier mindset defends as follows:
Comfort: We shield ourselves from unpleasant emotions. If you have invested time and energy in convincing yourself and others of something (e.g., that the earth is flat or not, that global warming is a threat or not, that abortion is okay or not), you will avoid evidence to the contrary because you want to avoid the shame, embarrassment, or dissonance that would go along with admitting you were wrong.
Self-esteem: We enhance or protect our self-image. If you are wealthy, you might ignore or discount evidence of systemic injustice or inequality. At some level, you want to maintain the belief that you earned what you got within a just and equitable system. If you are relatively poor, you’ll think the opposite and blame bad luck for your setbacks.
Morale: We fight to preserve our motivations and expectations. If you are committed to a new business idea, you might avoid evidence that it could fail. You want to protect your motivation to give it your best shot, holding on to your expectation that your hard work will pay off.
Persuasion: We defend our ability to convince others. If you’re in the middle of a messy divorce or court battle, you might fiercely deny your adversary’s claims, however reasonable. You want to stay convinced of the righteousness of your cause so that you can be convincing to others.
Image: We shield our reputation. If someone accuses you of plagiarism, you may look for all kinds of reasons why your uncited use of a source was excusable. As in the case of René Diekstra.
Belonging: We protect our place of belonging in social groups. If your belief in God is required for membership and belonging in a community of faith (or required to keep your job in it), then you may tend to avoid evidence that God might not exist.
Given the outlined futility of unstructured online argumentation, it remains to be seen whether I will, in the future, resist the urge to engage with those who demonstrate blatant bigotry. The mindfulness required could well be the deterrent.
#BlogOfTheAmericanPhilosophicalAssociation #Gaza #IsaacWiegman #JonathanSwift #JuliaGalef #Palestinian #rationalising #reasoning #soldierMindset #TheScoutMindset -
The difference between rationalising and reasoning, and why it’s futile to argue on social media
It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.
– Jonathan Swift (atttibuted)Here’s the thing! I’m about to advise you not to do something I have been regularly indulging in. Having lots of time at my disposal, I developed an admittedly nasty penchant for responding to the blatant bigotry in the comments sections of various social media platforms.
You can hate me later, but first let me tell you why I’ve decided to come clean about it. It’s not just the barefaced ignorance of recorded history, wilful misunderstanding and perversion of current events, debasement of civil norms, disingenuity, and rank hypocrisy of the social commentators. Worse, it’s the (mis)appropriation of divine authority (why is it almost always the Christians?), and the sheer inhumanity, entitlement, and complete lack of awareness that incenses me.
I have, unfortunately, developed a habit of making screen prints on my mobile device of exchanges with complete strangers on social media because of the distasteful practice of some who, having been called out or chastised, delete their comments. Here is an example of just one such comment made in response to an article by a local online newspaper, bemoaning the bombing of Palestinian schoolchildren in Gaza:
There were so many others, most excusing or justifying the Israeli bombing, closing ranks around the depraved Israeli soldiers and nation, while cold-heartedly ignoring the object of the article itself. My comment, as it usually does, generated a heap of nasty responses and, of course, the obligatory insults.
Of course, my antagonist had to double down on his position when I challenged both his insult and his uneducated approach to reasoning.
My parting response remains unanswered. Maybe he finally figured it out, but perhaps that’s too much to hope for. The subtleties of the English language were furthest from Paul’s mind. Paul’s intention was to ridicule, insult and score brownie points with like-minded online commentators who frequently use laugh emojis among others to buttress their argument, or lack of it.
While I’m not particularly proud of my final response, it does lead to the main reason for this post. It’s not the first time I’ve encountered someone who does not understand the difference between reasoning and rationalising.
Reasoning is the objective process of using logic and evidence to discover the truth. Rationalising, however, is a psychological defense mechanism where you start with a preconceived conclusion or emotional bias, and work backward to invent superficially plausible justifications to defend it.
Paul had already rationalised his support for Israel and their military campaign in Gaza. He had convinced himself that his rationalisations were sound. Arguing with him online was bound to fail. Writing in the Blog of the American Philosophical Association, Isaac Wiegman provides reasons why arguments almost never work.
Wiegman writes about our inclination for defensiveness and motivated reasoning, and draws on The Scout Mindset, a book by Julia Galef, who hosted Rationally Speaking, a podcast I used to follow more than a decade ago, before podcasts became so widely popular. Julia distinguishes between thoughtful reasoning, which she calls the Scout Mindset and motivated reasoning, which she calls Soldier Mindset. She outlines six broad categories that a soldier mindset defends as follows:
Comfort: We shield ourselves from unpleasant emotions. If you have invested time and energy in convincing yourself and others of something (e.g., that the earth is flat or not, that global warming is a threat or not, that abortion is okay or not), you will avoid evidence to the contrary because you want to avoid the shame, embarrassment, or dissonance that would go along with admitting you were wrong.
Self-esteem: We enhance or protect our self-image. If you are wealthy, you might ignore or discount evidence of systemic injustice or inequality. At some level, you want to maintain the belief that you earned what you got within a just and equitable system. If you are relatively poor, you’ll think the opposite and blame bad luck for your setbacks.
Morale: We fight to preserve our motivations and expectations. If you are committed to a new business idea, you might avoid evidence that it could fail. You want to protect your motivation to give it your best shot, holding on to your expectation that your hard work will pay off.
Persuasion: We defend our ability to convince others. If you’re in the middle of a messy divorce or court battle, you might fiercely deny your adversary’s claims, however reasonable. You want to stay convinced of the righteousness of your cause so that you can be convincing to others.
Image: We shield our reputation. If someone accuses you of plagiarism, you may look for all kinds of reasons why your uncited use of a source was excusable. As in the case of René Diekstra.
Belonging: We protect our place of belonging in social groups. If your belief in God is required for membership and belonging in a community of faith (or required to keep your job in it), then you may tend to avoid evidence that God might not exist.
Given the outlined futility of unstructured online argumentation, it remains to be seen whether I will, in the future, resist the urge to engage with those who demonstrate blatant bigotry. The mindfulness required could well be the deterrent.
#BlogOfTheAmericanPhilosophicalAssociation #Gaza #IsaacWiegman #JonathanSwift #JuliaGalef #Palestinian #rationalising #reasoning #soldierMindset #TheScoutMindset -
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said she was subjected to pressure and threats linked to the court’s investigation into Palestine.
She said this included direct contact from Israeli security officials, among them former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who met her twice in Munich and New York and demanded that she stop the investigation into the Palestinian case.
She added that the pressure later escalated to indirect threats targeting members of her family, noting that her husband was followed and information about him was collected as part of what she described as an attempt to pressure her.
She confirmed that she informed the Dutch authorities about these threats, but said she did not receive what she considered adequate protection.
-
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said she was subjected to pressure and threats linked to the court’s investigation into Palestine.
She said this included direct contact from Israeli security officials, among them former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who met her twice in Munich and New York and demanded that she stop the investigation into the Palestinian case.
She added that the pressure later escalated to indirect threats targeting members of her family, noting that her husband was followed and information about him was collected as part of what she described as an attempt to pressure her.
She confirmed that she informed the Dutch authorities about these threats, but said she did not receive what she considered adequate protection.
-
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said she was subjected to pressure and threats linked to the court’s investigation into Palestine.
She said this included direct contact from Israeli security officials, among them former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who met her twice in Munich and New York and demanded that she stop the investigation into the Palestinian case.
She added that the pressure later escalated to indirect threats targeting members of her family, noting that her husband was followed and information about him was collected as part of what she described as an attempt to pressure her.
She confirmed that she informed the Dutch authorities about these threats, but said she did not receive what she considered adequate protection.
-
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said she was subjected to pressure and threats linked to the court’s investigation into Palestine.
She said this included direct contact from Israeli security officials, among them former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who met her twice in Munich and New York and demanded that she stop the investigation into the Palestinian case.
She added that the pressure later escalated to indirect threats targeting members of her family, noting that her husband was followed and information about him was collected as part of what she described as an attempt to pressure her.
She confirmed that she informed the Dutch authorities about these threats, but said she did not receive what she considered adequate protection.
-
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said she was subjected to pressure and threats linked to the court’s investigation into Palestine.
She said this included direct contact from Israeli security officials, among them former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who met her twice in Munich and New York and demanded that she stop the investigation into the Palestinian case.
She added that the pressure later escalated to indirect threats targeting members of her family, noting that her husband was followed and information about him was collected as part of what she described as an attempt to pressure her.
She confirmed that she informed the Dutch authorities about these threats, but said she did not receive what she considered adequate protection.
-
Last night, Israeli settler militias burned multiple Palestinian vehicles in Khirbet Saud, near Ya’bad in the Jenin district of the occupied West Bank.
-
Last night, Israeli settler militias burned multiple Palestinian vehicles in Khirbet Saud, near Ya’bad in the Jenin district of the occupied West Bank.
-
Last night, Israeli settler militias burned multiple Palestinian vehicles in Khirbet Saud, near Ya’bad in the Jenin district of the occupied West Bank.
-
Last night, Israeli settler militias burned multiple Palestinian vehicles in Khirbet Saud, near Ya’bad in the Jenin district of the occupied West Bank.