home.social

#strongtowns — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #strongtowns, aggregated by home.social.

  1. RE: social.coop/@Sam_/116994488871

    A few weeks after I installed this bench, the city removed the bus stop as part of their planned service reduction. Now what? #strongtowns #portland #busstopbenches

  2. RE: social.coop/@Sam_/116994488871

    A few weeks after I installed this bench, the city removed the bus stop as part of their planned service reduction. Now what? #strongtowns #portland #busstopbenches

  3. Regen Melbourne

    I can’t believe I have not written about Regen Melbourne before. I have been loosely involved with them from the beginning and the crafting of their original co-created vision statement, based on Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics model. I have also had the pleasure of being part of some of their workshops, and they have also been of great help and support with my own personal regeneration project.

    Over the years, Regen Melbourne’s work has steadily evolved and now coalesces around three key Earthshots. An Earthshot is a declaration of intent to solve complex social and ecological challenges. Earthshots recognise that social and ecological regeneration are inseparable. They set an ambition of possibility, coherence of a collective response, and agitation of the conditions we operate within. Earthshots are whole-of-city in scope, long-term in commitment, and open to many entry points.

    Each Earthshot has six key qualities.

    Wildly Ambitious

    Because the scale of the challenges demand it. We are all invested in the social and ecological future of this place.

    Systems-oriented

    Looking at the conditions we need not just outputs. Oriented towards multi-benefits not single solutions.

    Whole-of-city

    No one organisation can own the scope of the Earthshot. We are interconnected, so too must our response be.

    Coherence, not consensus

    There is no blueprint. Forward-leaning action looks like smart collaboration, not waiting for everyone to agree.

    Long-term and open

    Committed to building broad support over time. An Earthshot is a platform for entry points, not a closed project.

    Of and for Melbourne

    These Earthshots are in service to place. They build on what makes this city thrive and centre care for our future.

    The current Earthshots they are focussing on are:

    Swimmable Birrarung
    A thriving and swimmable Birrarung, from source to sea
    300,000 Streets
    A city of participatory and truly liveable streets
    Nourished Neighbourhoods
    A network of resilient local food economies across our city

    You can find a load more about all of this on their website but what caught my eye recently was this particular article, The Power of Participation: Strengthening the civic muscle of Greater Melbourne. [LINK] The author, Joel Backwell, covers a lot of ground in this post talking about Participatory Urbanism in Melbourne, from “what we are seeing” now, to “where to from here”. For anyone living in Melbourne it’s a great snapshot of some of the wonderful projects and orgs operating on the ground and the work they are doing. The article asks the big questions about participation as well as explaining its importance. Something I have done in previous posts: HERE and HERE

    What we are interested in is how all this participation comes together, in service of Greater Melbourne. How intentional must we be in directing this participation towards influencing and shaping power? Or is it enough to just create opportunities for people to come together to discuss what matters to them and their neighbourhoods, and then let a thousand flowers bloom? Can we expect that participation, in response to societal and environmental challenges, will organically scale up to political action? Or will it require organisations like Regen Melbourne to help join the dots, bring these spheres of activity together and build new spaces and institutions for collaboration and collective decision-making at a city scale?

    I’ll wrap this up here because I hope I’ve given enough reasons to go and read the post and check out more about what Regen Melbourne is doing in general on their website here: https://regen.melbourne They have their fingers in a lot of pies, so for anyone interested in Climate Change, Social Justice, or Regeneration, you will find loads of stuff to dive into: Climate Change ExchangeDemocracy Beyond the Ballot BoxConnected CorridorsSchool Streets

    Other links

    You can follow The REGEN Gazette here: https://regen.melbourne/the-gazette
    The People’s Plan for Footscray https://peoplesplanfootscray.net/
    McKinnon and Foundations for Tomorrow https://foundationsfortomorrow.org
    Doing Co: https://doingco.org/

    #Biodiversity #Environment #Melbourne #OurWonderfulGreenFuture #Participation #ParticipatoryUrbanism #Regeneration #RegenMelbourne #SolarPunk #StrongTowns #sustainability #Urbanism
  4. Regen Melbourne

    I can’t believe I have not written about Regen Melbourne before. I have been loosely involved with them from the beginning and the crafting of their original co-created vision statement, based on Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics model. I have also had the pleasure of being part of some of their workshops, and they have also been of great help and support with my own personal regeneration project.

    Over the years, Regen Melbourne’s work has steadily evolved and now coalesces around three key Earthshots. An Earthshot is a declaration of intent to solve complex social and ecological challenges. Earthshots recognise that social and ecological regeneration are inseparable. They set an ambition of possibility, coherence of a collective response, and agitation of the conditions we operate within. Earthshots are whole-of-city in scope, long-term in commitment, and open to many entry points.

    Each Earthshot has six key qualities.

    Wildly Ambitious

    Because the scale of the challenges demand it. We are all invested in the social and ecological future of this place.

    Systems-oriented

    Looking at the conditions we need not just outputs. Oriented towards multi-benefits not single solutions.

    Whole-of-city

    No one organisation can own the scope of the Earthshot. We are interconnected, so too must our response be.

    Coherence, not consensus

    There is no blueprint. Forward-leaning action looks like smart collaboration, not waiting for everyone to agree.

    Long-term and open

    Committed to building broad support over time. An Earthshot is a platform for entry points, not a closed project.

    Of and for Melbourne

    These Earthshots are in service to place. They build on what makes this city thrive and centre care for our future.

    The current Earthshots they are focussing on are:

    Swimmable Birrarung
    A thriving and swimmable Birrarung, from source to sea
    300,000 Streets
    A city of participatory and truly liveable streets
    Nourished Neighbourhoods
    A network of resilient local food economies across our city

    You can find a load more about all of this on their website but what caught my eye recently was this particular article, The Power of Participation: Strengthening the civic muscle of Greater Melbourne. [LINK] The author, Joel Backwell, covers a lot of ground in this post talking about Participatory Urbanism in Melbourne, from “what we are seeing” now, to “where to from here”. For anyone living in Melbourne it’s a great snapshot of some of the wonderful projects and orgs operating on the ground and the work they are doing. The article asks the big questions about participation as well as explaining its importance. Something I have done in previous posts: HERE and HERE

    What we are interested in is how all this participation comes together, in service of Greater Melbourne. How intentional must we be in directing this participation towards influencing and shaping power? Or is it enough to just create opportunities for people to come together to discuss what matters to them and their neighbourhoods, and then let a thousand flowers bloom? Can we expect that participation, in response to societal and environmental challenges, will organically scale up to political action? Or will it require organisations like Regen Melbourne to help join the dots, bring these spheres of activity together and build new spaces and institutions for collaboration and collective decision-making at a city scale?

    I’ll wrap this up here because I hope I’ve given enough reasons to go and read the post and check out more about what Regen Melbourne is doing in general on their website here: https://regen.melbourne They have their fingers in a lot of pies, so for anyone interested in Climate Change, Social Justice, or Regeneration, you will find loads of stuff to dive into: Climate Change ExchangeDemocracy Beyond the Ballot BoxConnected CorridorsSchool Streets

    Other links

    You can follow The REGEN Gazette here: https://regen.melbourne/the-gazette
    The People’s Plan for Footscray https://peoplesplanfootscray.net/
    McKinnon and Foundations for Tomorrow https://foundationsfortomorrow.org
    Doing Co: https://doingco.org/

    #Biodiversity #Environment #Melbourne #OurWonderfulGreenFuture #Participation #ParticipatoryUrbanism #Regeneration #RegenMelbourne #SolarPunk #StrongTowns #sustainability #Urbanism
  5. Regen Melbourne

    I can’t believe I have not written about Regen Melbourne before. I have been loosely involved with them from the beginning and the crafting of their original co-created vision statement, based on Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics model. I have also had the pleasure of being part of some of their workshops, and they have also been of great help and support with my own personal regeneration project.

    Over the years, Regen Melbourne’s work has steadily evolved and now coalesces around three key Earthshots. An Earthshot is a declaration of intent to solve complex social and ecological challenges. Earthshots recognise that social and ecological regeneration are inseparable. They set an ambition of possibility, coherence of a collective response, and agitation of the conditions we operate within. Earthshots are whole-of-city in scope, long-term in commitment, and open to many entry points.

    Each Earthshot has six key qualities.

    Wildly Ambitious

    Because the scale of the challenges demand it. We are all invested in the social and ecological future of this place.

    Systems-oriented

    Looking at the conditions we need not just outputs. Oriented towards multi-benefits not single solutions.

    Whole-of-city

    No one organisation can own the scope of the Earthshot. We are interconnected, so too must our response be.

    Coherence, not consensus

    There is no blueprint. Forward-leaning action looks like smart collaboration, not waiting for everyone to agree.

    Long-term and open

    Committed to building broad support over time. An Earthshot is a platform for entry points, not a closed project.

    Of and for Melbourne

    These Earthshots are in service to place. They build on what makes this city thrive and centre care for our future.

    The current Earthshots they are focussing on are:

    Swimmable Birrarung
    A thriving and swimmable Birrarung, from source to sea
    300,000 Streets
    A city of participatory and truly liveable streets
    Nourished Neighbourhoods
    A network of resilient local food economies across our city

    You can find a load more about all of this on their website but what caught my eye recently was this particular article, The Power of Participation: Strengthening the civic muscle of Greater Melbourne. [LINK] The author, Joel Backwell, covers a lot of ground in this post talking about Participatory Urbanism in Melbourne, from “what we are seeing” now, to “where to from here”. For anyone living in Melbourne it’s a great snapshot of some of the wonderful projects and orgs operating on the ground and the work they are doing. The article asks the big questions about participation as well as explaining its importance. Something I have done in previous posts: HERE and HERE

    What we are interested in is how all this participation comes together, in service of Greater Melbourne. How intentional must we be in directing this participation towards influencing and shaping power? Or is it enough to just create opportunities for people to come together to discuss what matters to them and their neighbourhoods, and then let a thousand flowers bloom? Can we expect that participation, in response to societal and environmental challenges, will organically scale up to political action? Or will it require organisations like Regen Melbourne to help join the dots, bring these spheres of activity together and build new spaces and institutions for collaboration and collective decision-making at a city scale?

    I’ll wrap this up here because I hope I’ve given enough reasons to go and read the post and check out more about what Regen Melbourne is doing in general on their website here: https://regen.melbourne They have their fingers in a lot of pies, so for anyone interested in Climate Change, Social Justice, or Regeneration, you will find loads of stuff to dive into: Climate Change ExchangeDemocracy Beyond the Ballot BoxConnected CorridorsSchool Streets

    Other links

    You can follow The REGEN Gazette here: https://regen.melbourne/the-gazette
    The People’s Plan for Footscray https://peoplesplanfootscray.net/
    McKinnon and Foundations for Tomorrow https://foundationsfortomorrow.org
    Doing Co: https://doingco.org/

    #Biodiversity #Environment #Melbourne #OurWonderfulGreenFuture #Participation #ParticipatoryUrbanism #Regeneration #RegenMelbourne #SolarPunk #StrongTowns #sustainability #Urbanism
  6. Regen Melbourne

    I can’t believe I have not written about Regen Melbourne before. I have been loosely involved with them from the beginning and the crafting of their original co-created vision statement, based on Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics model. I have also had the pleasure of being part of some of their workshops, and they have also been of great help and support with my own personal regeneration project.

    Over the years, Regen Melbourne’s work has steadily evolved and now coalesces around three key Earthshots. An Earthshot is a declaration of intent to solve complex social and ecological challenges. Earthshots recognise that social and ecological regeneration are inseparable. They set an ambition of possibility, coherence of a collective response, and agitation of the conditions we operate within. Earthshots are whole-of-city in scope, long-term in commitment, and open to many entry points.

    Each Earthshot has six key qualities.

    Wildly Ambitious

    Because the scale of the challenges demand it. We are all invested in the social and ecological future of this place.

    Systems-oriented

    Looking at the conditions we need not just outputs. Oriented towards multi-benefits not single solutions.

    Whole-of-city

    No one organisation can own the scope of the Earthshot. We are interconnected, so too must our response be.

    Coherence, not consensus

    There is no blueprint. Forward-leaning action looks like smart collaboration, not waiting for everyone to agree.

    Long-term and open

    Committed to building broad support over time. An Earthshot is a platform for entry points, not a closed project.

    Of and for Melbourne

    These Earthshots are in service to place. They build on what makes this city thrive and centre care for our future.

    The current Earthshots they are focussing on are:

    Swimmable Birrarung
    A thriving and swimmable Birrarung, from source to sea
    300,000 Streets
    A city of participatory and truly liveable streets
    Nourished Neighbourhoods
    A network of resilient local food economies across our city

    You can find a load more about all of this on their website but what caught my eye recently was this particular article, The Power of Participation: Strengthening the civic muscle of Greater Melbourne. [LINK] The author, Joel Backwell, covers a lot of ground in this post talking about Participatory Urbanism in Melbourne, from “what we are seeing” now, to “where to from here”. For anyone living in Melbourne it’s a great snapshot of some of the wonderful projects and orgs operating on the ground and the work they are doing. The article asks the big questions about participation as well as explaining its importance. Something I have done in previous posts: HERE and HERE

    What we are interested in is how all this participation comes together, in service of Greater Melbourne. How intentional must we be in directing this participation towards influencing and shaping power? Or is it enough to just create opportunities for people to come together to discuss what matters to them and their neighbourhoods, and then let a thousand flowers bloom? Can we expect that participation, in response to societal and environmental challenges, will organically scale up to political action? Or will it require organisations like Regen Melbourne to help join the dots, bring these spheres of activity together and build new spaces and institutions for collaboration and collective decision-making at a city scale?

    I’ll wrap this up here because I hope I’ve given enough reasons to go and read the post and check out more about what Regen Melbourne is doing in general on their website here: https://regen.melbourne They have their fingers in a lot of pies, so for anyone interested in Climate Change, Social Justice, or Regeneration, you will find loads of stuff to dive into: Climate Change ExchangeDemocracy Beyond the Ballot BoxConnected CorridorsSchool Streets

    Other links

    You can follow The REGEN Gazette here: https://regen.melbourne/the-gazette
    The People’s Plan for Footscray https://peoplesplanfootscray.net/
    McKinnon and Foundations for Tomorrow https://foundationsfortomorrow.org
    Doing Co: https://doingco.org/

    #Biodiversity #Environment #Melbourne #OurWonderfulGreenFuture #Participation #ParticipatoryUrbanism #Regeneration #RegenMelbourne #SolarPunk #StrongTowns #sustainability #Urbanism
  7. Regen Melbourne

    I can’t believe I have not written about Regen Melbourne before. I have been loosely involved with them from the beginning and the crafting of their original co-created vision statement, based on Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics model. I have also had the pleasure of being part of some of their workshops, and they have also been of great help and support with my own personal regeneration project.

    Over the years, Regen Melbourne’s work has steadily evolved and now coalesces around three key Earthshots. An Earthshot is a declaration of intent to solve complex social and ecological challenges. Earthshots recognise that social and ecological regeneration are inseparable. They set an ambition of possibility, coherence of a collective response, and agitation of the conditions we operate within. Earthshots are whole-of-city in scope, long-term in commitment, and open to many entry points.

    Each Earthshot has six key qualities.

    Wildly Ambitious

    Because the scale of the challenges demand it. We are all invested in the social and ecological future of this place.

    Systems-oriented

    Looking at the conditions we need not just outputs. Oriented towards multi-benefits not single solutions.

    Whole-of-city

    No one organisation can own the scope of the Earthshot. We are interconnected, so too must our response be.

    Coherence, not consensus

    There is no blueprint. Forward-leaning action looks like smart collaboration, not waiting for everyone to agree.

    Long-term and open

    Committed to building broad support over time. An Earthshot is a platform for entry points, not a closed project.

    Of and for Melbourne

    These Earthshots are in service to place. They build on what makes this city thrive and centre care for our future.

    The current Earthshots they are focussing on are:

    Swimmable Birrarung
    A thriving and swimmable Birrarung, from source to sea
    300,000 Streets
    A city of participatory and truly liveable streets
    Nourished Neighbourhoods
    A network of resilient local food economies across our city

    You can find a load more about all of this on their website but what caught my eye recently was this particular article, The Power of Participation: Strengthening the civic muscle of Greater Melbourne. [LINK] The author, Joel Backwell, covers a lot of ground in this post talking about Participatory Urbanism in Melbourne, from “what we are seeing” now, to “where to from here”. For anyone living in Melbourne it’s a great snapshot of some of the wonderful projects and orgs operating on the ground and the work they are doing. The article asks the big questions about participation as well as explaining its importance. Something I have done in previous posts: HERE and HERE

    What we are interested in is how all this participation comes together, in service of Greater Melbourne. How intentional must we be in directing this participation towards influencing and shaping power? Or is it enough to just create opportunities for people to come together to discuss what matters to them and their neighbourhoods, and then let a thousand flowers bloom? Can we expect that participation, in response to societal and environmental challenges, will organically scale up to political action? Or will it require organisations like Regen Melbourne to help join the dots, bring these spheres of activity together and build new spaces and institutions for collaboration and collective decision-making at a city scale?

    I’ll wrap this up here because I hope I’ve given enough reasons to go and read the post and check out more about what Regen Melbourne is doing in general on their website here: https://regen.melbourne They have their fingers in a lot of pies, so for anyone interested in Climate Change, Social Justice, or Regeneration, you will find loads of stuff to dive into: Climate Change ExchangeDemocracy Beyond the Ballot BoxConnected CorridorsSchool Streets

    Other links

    You can follow The REGEN Gazette here: https://regen.melbourne/the-gazette
    The People’s Plan for Footscray https://peoplesplanfootscray.net/
    McKinnon and Foundations for Tomorrow https://foundationsfortomorrow.org
    Doing Co: https://doingco.org/

    #Biodiversity #Environment #Melbourne #OurWonderfulGreenFuture #Participation #ParticipatoryUrbanism #Regeneration #RegenMelbourne #SolarPunk #StrongTowns #sustainability #Urbanism
  8. StrongtownsGR meeting this week Wednesday at the Broadleaf Brewing on Bridge St. 2026-08-19 at 6:30pm. Let's talk about the future of downtown (GR Forward), transit & mobility (The MobileGR Blueprint), and organizing. #GrandRapidsMI #Strongtowns #StrongtownsGR #CorePrioritiesGR

  9. StrongtownsGR meeting this week Wednesday at the Broadleaf Brewing on Bridge St. 2026-08-19 at 6:30pm. Let's talk about the future of downtown (GR Forward), transit & mobility (The MobileGR Blueprint), and organizing. #GrandRapidsMI #Strongtowns #StrongtownsGR #CorePrioritiesGR

  10. StrongtownsGR meeting this week Wednesday at the Broadleaf Brewing on Bridge St. 2026-08-19 at 6:30pm. Let's talk about the future of downtown (GR Forward), transit & mobility (The MobileGR Blueprint), and organizing. #GrandRapidsMI #Strongtowns #StrongtownsGR #CorePrioritiesGR

  11. StrongtownsGR meeting this week Wednesday at the Broadleaf Brewing on Bridge St. 2026-08-19 at 6:30pm. Let's talk about the future of downtown (GR Forward), transit & mobility (The MobileGR Blueprint), and organizing. #GrandRapidsMI #Strongtowns #StrongtownsGR #CorePrioritiesGR

  12. The Interstate Highway mission ended in 1992. The Highway Trust Fund did not.

    We now face record spending, growing maintenance gaps, and projects that don’t match local realities.

    youtube.com/watch?v=8w1ss8BXCw

    #StrongTowns

  13. The Interstate Highway mission ended in 1992. The Highway Trust Fund did not.

    We now face record spending, growing maintenance gaps, and projects that don’t match local realities.

    youtube.com/watch?v=8w1ss8BXCw

    #StrongTowns

  14. The Interstate Highway mission ended in 1992. The Highway Trust Fund did not.

    We now face record spending, growing maintenance gaps, and projects that don’t match local realities.

    youtube.com/watch?v=8w1ss8BXCw

    #StrongTowns

  15. The Interstate Highway mission ended in 1992. The Highway Trust Fund did not.

    We now face record spending, growing maintenance gaps, and projects that don’t match local realities.

    youtube.com/watch?v=8w1ss8BXCw

    #StrongTowns

  16. The Interstate Highway mission ended in 1992. The Highway Trust Fund did not.

    We now face record spending, growing maintenance gaps, and projects that don’t match local realities.

    youtube.com/watch?v=8w1ss8BXCw

    #StrongTowns

  17. You can’t solve a housing shortage with a system designed to keep housing scarce.

    From 2006 through 2025, Canada’s dwelling stock grew by about 4.29 million units.

    To keep up with household formation, restore a healthy vacancy buffer and account for households that couldn’t form because housing wasn’t attainable, we needed about 4.96 million.

    That’s a 671,000-home shortfall in just 20 years.

    And we were already roughly 459,000 homes behind when that period began. Total gap today: 1,130,128 homes.

    About 475,000 of that is the basic demographic and vacancy shortage. Another 655,000 represents suppressed households: people who would have formed their own household if a suitable home had actually been available at a price they could manage.

    The whole system is built to protect scarcity.

    Zoning limits what can be built. Financing makes small, incremental projects unnecessarily difficult. Tax policy rewards rising property values. And with roughly two-thirds of Canadian households owning their homes, politicians know that falling prices are a much harder sell than vague promises to “build more.”

    So we get longer mortgages, bigger savings accounts, buyer incentives and subsidized loans. More money to chase too few homes.

    The Strong Towns point is that no amount of wrangling around the edges will fix a system whose basic incentives all point the wrong way.

    We need to legalize small apartments, multiplexes and backyard homes in ordinary neighbourhoods (a big step towards this in BC recently, yay!). Make financing work for small builders. Tax land more and buildings less. Build public, co-op and non-market housing at a serious scale.

    But first Canada has to pick a lane: is housing shelter that ordinary people should be able to afford? Or is it an investment that homeowners can expect to beat inflation, year after year?

    It cannot reliably be both.

    #canpoli #cdnpoli #bcpoli #housing #StrongTowns

  18. You can’t solve a housing shortage with a system designed to keep housing scarce.

    From 2006 through 2025, Canada’s dwelling stock grew by about 4.29 million units.

    To keep up with household formation, restore a healthy vacancy buffer and account for households that couldn’t form because housing wasn’t attainable, we needed about 4.96 million.

    That’s a 671,000-home shortfall in just 20 years.

    And we were already roughly 459,000 homes behind when that period began. Total gap today: 1,130,128 homes.

    About 475,000 of that is the basic demographic and vacancy shortage. Another 655,000 represents suppressed households: people who would have formed their own household if a suitable home had actually been available at a price they could manage.

    The whole system is built to protect scarcity.

    Zoning limits what can be built. Financing makes small, incremental projects unnecessarily difficult. Tax policy rewards rising property values. And with roughly two-thirds of Canadian households owning their homes, politicians know that falling prices are a much harder sell than vague promises to “build more.”

    So we get longer mortgages, bigger savings accounts, buyer incentives and subsidized loans. More money to chase too few homes.

    The Strong Towns point is that no amount of wrangling around the edges will fix a system whose basic incentives all point the wrong way.

    We need to legalize small apartments, multiplexes and backyard homes in ordinary neighbourhoods (a big step towards this in BC recently, yay!). Make financing work for small builders. Tax land more and buildings less. Build public, co-op and non-market housing at a serious scale.

    But first Canada has to pick a lane: is housing shelter that ordinary people should be able to afford? Or is it an investment that homeowners can expect to beat inflation, year after year?

    It cannot reliably be both.

    #canpoli #cdnpoli #bcpoli #housing #StrongTowns

  19. You can’t solve a housing shortage with a system designed to keep housing scarce.

    From 2006 through 2025, Canada’s dwelling stock grew by about 4.29 million units.

    To keep up with household formation, restore a healthy vacancy buffer and account for households that couldn’t form because housing wasn’t attainable, we needed about 4.96 million.

    That’s a 671,000-home shortfall in just 20 years.

    And we were already roughly 459,000 homes behind when that period began. Total gap today: 1,130,128 homes.

    About 475,000 of that is the basic demographic and vacancy shortage. Another 655,000 represents suppressed households: people who would have formed their own household if a suitable home had actually been available at a price they could manage.

    The whole system is built to protect scarcity.

    Zoning limits what can be built. Financing makes small, incremental projects unnecessarily difficult. Tax policy rewards rising property values. And with roughly two-thirds of Canadian households owning their homes, politicians know that falling prices are a much harder sell than vague promises to “build more.”

    So we get longer mortgages, bigger savings accounts, buyer incentives and subsidized loans. More money to chase too few homes.

    The Strong Towns point is that no amount of wrangling around the edges will fix a system whose basic incentives all point the wrong way.

    We need to legalize small apartments, multiplexes and backyard homes in ordinary neighbourhoods (a big step towards this in BC recently, yay!). Make financing work for small builders. Tax land more and buildings less. Build public, co-op and non-market housing at a serious scale.

    But first Canada has to pick a lane: is housing shelter that ordinary people should be able to afford? Or is it an investment that homeowners can expect to beat inflation, year after year?

    It cannot reliably be both.

    #canpoli #cdnpoli #bcpoli #housing #StrongTowns

  20. You can’t solve a housing shortage with a system designed to keep housing scarce.

    From 2006 through 2025, Canada’s dwelling stock grew by about 4.29 million units.

    To keep up with household formation, restore a healthy vacancy buffer and account for households that couldn’t form because housing wasn’t attainable, we needed about 4.96 million.

    That’s a 671,000-home shortfall in just 20 years.

    And we were already roughly 459,000 homes behind when that period began. Total gap today: 1,130,128 homes.

    About 475,000 of that is the basic demographic and vacancy shortage. Another 655,000 represents suppressed households: people who would have formed their own household if a suitable home had actually been available at a price they could manage.

    The whole system is built to protect scarcity.

    Zoning limits what can be built. Financing makes small, incremental projects unnecessarily difficult. Tax policy rewards rising property values. And with roughly two-thirds of Canadian households owning their homes, politicians know that falling prices are a much harder sell than vague promises to “build more.”

    So we get longer mortgages, bigger savings accounts, buyer incentives and subsidized loans. More money to chase too few homes.

    The Strong Towns point is that no amount of wrangling around the edges will fix a system whose basic incentives all point the wrong way.

    We need to legalize small apartments, multiplexes and backyard homes in ordinary neighbourhoods (a big step towards this in BC recently, yay!). Make financing work for small builders. Tax land more and buildings less. Build public, co-op and non-market housing at a serious scale.

    But first Canada has to pick a lane: is housing shelter that ordinary people should be able to afford? Or is it an investment that homeowners can expect to beat inflation, year after year?

    It cannot reliably be both.

    #canpoli #cdnpoli #bcpoli #housing #StrongTowns

  21. You can’t solve a housing shortage with a system designed to keep housing scarce.

    From 2006 through 2025, Canada’s dwelling stock grew by about 4.29 million units.

    To keep up with household formation, restore a healthy vacancy buffer and account for households that couldn’t form because housing wasn’t attainable, we needed about 4.96 million.

    That’s a 671,000-home shortfall in just 20 years.

    And we were already roughly 459,000 homes behind when that period began. Total gap today: 1,130,128 homes.

    About 475,000 of that is the basic demographic and vacancy shortage. Another 655,000 represents suppressed households: people who would have formed their own household if a suitable home had actually been available at a price they could manage.

    The whole system is built to protect scarcity.

    Zoning limits what can be built. Financing makes small, incremental projects unnecessarily difficult. Tax policy rewards rising property values. And with roughly two-thirds of Canadian households owning their homes, politicians know that falling prices are a much harder sell than vague promises to “build more.”

    So we get longer mortgages, bigger savings accounts, buyer incentives and subsidized loans. More money to chase too few homes.

    The Strong Towns point is that no amount of wrangling around the edges will fix a system whose basic incentives all point the wrong way.

    We need to legalize small apartments, multiplexes and backyard homes in ordinary neighbourhoods (a big step towards this in BC recently, yay!). Make financing work for small builders. Tax land more and buildings less. Build public, co-op and non-market housing at a serious scale.

    But first Canada has to pick a lane: is housing shelter that ordinary people should be able to afford? Or is it an investment that homeowners can expect to beat inflation, year after year?

    It cannot reliably be both.

    #canpoli #cdnpoli #bcpoli #housing #StrongTowns

  22. I'd happily take a introductory car maintenance course from a non-carcentric mechanic. I.e a mechanic who is down with the #strongTowns, #safeStreets, #banCars agenda

  23. I'd happily take a introductory car maintenance course from a non-carcentric mechanic. I.e a mechanic who is down with the #strongTowns, #safeStreets, #banCars agenda

  24. I'd happily take a introductory car maintenance course from a non-carcentric mechanic. I.e a mechanic who is down with the #strongTowns, #safeStreets, #banCars agenda

  25. I'd happily take a introductory car maintenance course from a non-carcentric mechanic. I.e a mechanic who is down with the #strongTowns, #safeStreets, #banCars agenda