#generalsemantics — Public Fediverse posts

I have a new, long-ish post on Alfred Korzybski's use of his map metaphor (nowadays simplified as "the map is not the territory"). And what I now see as its confusions! Enjoy!!

Read it at https://www.mappingasprocess.net/blog/2026/3/13/maps-territory-and-self-reflexivity-confusions-ofbyabout-korzybski

#maps #MapHistory #cartography #GeneralSemantics #Korzybski

www.linkedin.com/posts/dimitr... #Science #HumanReasoning #BrainFunction #GeneralSemantics #ScienceAndSanity #WordsAreUnitsOfBrainFunction

Very well said by the great th...

😵 Rigid and negative thought patterns linked to increasing political polarization online

https://phys.org/news/2025-07-rigid-negative-thought-patterns-linked.html

#psychology #politics #politicalscience #mentalhealth #cbt #generalsemantics #cognition #polarization #socialmedia #research #socialscience

#Science #Scientist #Semantics www.linkedin.com/posts/michae... #TimeBinding ##HumanReasoning #GeneralSemantics #Philosophy #Logic #BrainFunction

Before 1834, they were 'na...

@anathema_device
2/2
And folk getting out over their skis:
" 2021 review .. ashwagandha ...“small but significant effect on overall sleep”
vs
Musgrave, “Is there any point in buying expensive supplements with the possibility of getting liver damage when there’s no really significant benefit to be had?”

Sometimes skeptics seem to lack rigor.

And do avoid heavy metal intakes.

cf #MartinGardner on #GeneralSemantics & #AlfredKorzybski
https://www.academia.edu/1067337/In_The_Name_Of_Skepticism_Martin_Gardners_Misrepresentations_of_General_Semantics

@yvanspijk
AIUI #Cybernetics has strong links with #GeneralSemantics which is poo-hooed by some #Skeptics due to an approach taken by #MartinGardner that is disputed in the article below.

https://www.academia.edu/1067337/In_The_Name_Of_Skepticism_Martin_Gardners_Misrepresentations_of_General_Semantics

The ultimate test of an empirical assumption is…: try to deny it, and see whether you can make your denial stick. “The map is not the territory”. You say, … “Can you produce it?” You can’t do that. Whatever else the map is, it isn’t what it is a map o̲f̲. Whatever else a statement is, it isn’t what the statement is a̲b̲o̲u̲t̲. … It may be better, worse, prettier, less pretty, moral, immoral etc., but …, it isn’t the thing you talk about.

./Chisholm F․ P․, ILoGS, 1945, p․ 38

#GeneralSemantics

For reasons connected with #GeneralSemantics I'm wary of any statement of "x is y" but can add more nuance in other places without being taken to deny someone else's gender.

The Trouble with Harry’s grammar

Alfred Hitchcock’s comedy-thriller The Trouble with Harry (1955), amidst all its talk of murder and romance, has a fun little exchange of sociolinguistic interest between John Forsythe (‘Sam Marlowe’) and Edmund Gwenn (‘Capt. Albert Wiles’):

Marlowe’s correction is notable for being relatively polite. Those who correct others’ speech uninvited often do so in a rude and judgemental way. Marlowe corrects Wiles gently and off-handedly, as though automatically correcting a child. Indeed, Wiles doesn’t even notice and reacts as if Marlowe had merely echoed him. For good measure he adds another nonstandard usage: past tense say for said.

That Miles doesn’t pick up on the prescriptive nudge also chimes with what happens when children have their speech corrected – they tend to repeat what they said rather than immediately adopt the ‘proper’ form. Abby Kaplan, in her excellent book about language myths, Women Talk More than Men, reviews the research and concludes:

Some parents tend to repeat or expand on their children’s utterances, but it is unclear whether children actually use this kind of feedback to correct their own speech. Since there are societies in which this kind of interaction is rare, it is unlikely that repetitions and expansions are absolutely necessary for language acquisition.

Of course, Captain Wiles has already fully acquired his language: it’s just that the variety or dialect he uses differs in some respects from standardized English, prompting Marlowe’s useless intervention.

The script for The Trouble with Harry was written by John Michael Hayes. I don’t know if the same exchange appears in the source novel by Jack Trevor Story, but Hitchcock obviously liked it. He featured another linguistic allusion, to Alfred Korzybski and his General Semantics, in The Birds:

Hitchcock’s interest in usage also manifests in a letter he wrote to Ernest Lehman, writer of North by Northwest, in which he wondered, in a parenthetical aside, if his use of while should be whilst. I covered the whilst, amongst, amidst issue in a previous post.