home.social

#ambrosebierce — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ambrosebierce, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    EXPEDIENCY, n. The father of all virtues.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Expediency,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-06-07)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85383…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #convenience #excuse #expediency #justification #opportunism #pragmatism #rationale #selfinterest #selfjustification #virtue

  2. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ERR, v.i. To believe or act in a way contrary to my beliefs and actions.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Err,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1884-05-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/85250…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #arrogance #belief #disagreement #ego #error #perspective #presumption #rightandwrong #selfrighteousness

  3. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    EPIDEMIC, n. A disease having a sociable turn and few prejudices.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Epidemic,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1883-04-28)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84987…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #contagion #disease #epidemic #illness #plague #sickness

  4. Hubris: the act of turning off the soldering iron without checking whether the soldered item works.

    #electronics #hobby #hubris #AmbroseBierce #soldering

  5. Hubris: the act of turning off the soldering iron without checking whether the soldered item works.

    #electronics #hobby #hubris #AmbroseBierce #soldering

  6. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    ENCOURAGE, v.t. To confirm a fool in a folly that is beginning to hurt him.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Encourage,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1883-03-10)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84872…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #encourage #encouragement

  7. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DRUNK, adj. Boozy, fuddled, corned, tipsy, mellow, soaken, full, groggy, tired, top-heavy, glorious, overcome, swipey, elevated, overtaken, screwed, raddled, lushy, nappy, muzzy, maudlin, pious, floppy, loppy, happy, etc.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Drunk,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-08-12)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84750…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #alcohol #drunkenness #intoxication

  8. LLM (noun): a machine used by software teams to turn piles of cash into technical debt

    #LLM #AI #software #TechDebt #TechnicalDebt #coding #AmbroseBierce

  9. LLM (noun): a machine used by software teams to turn piles of cash into technical debt

    #LLM #AI #software #TechDebt #TechnicalDebt #coding #AmbroseBierce

  10. Un 24 de juny naixia
    a Meigs County, Ohio, EUA
    l'Ambrose Gwinnet Bierce (1842 - 1914?).

    Excepcional escriptor i periodista que va desaparéixer sense deixar rastre en mig de la Revolució Mexicana.

    #24juny
    #AmbroseBierce

  11. Un 24 de juny naixia
    a Meigs County, Ohio, EUA
    l'Ambrose Gwinnet Bierce (1842 - 1914?).

    Excepcional escriptor i periodista que va desaparéixer sense deixar rastre en mig de la Revolució Mexicana.

    #24juny
    #AmbroseBierce

  12. "Who never doubted, never half believed. Where doubt is, there truth is - it is her shadow."

    ~ Ambrose Bierce, born today, 1842.

    #AmbroseBierce #Quote #Today

  13. "Who never doubted, never half believed. Where doubt is, there truth is - it is her shadow."

    ~ Ambrose Bierce, born today, 1842.

    #AmbroseBierce #Quote #Today

  14. “The clearest way to see through a culture is to attend to its tools for conversation”*…

    An example of dialogue with an early chatbot, excerpted from from its creator Joseph Weizenbaum’s 1976 book “Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation.”

    Matt Pearce revisits Neil Postman‘s 1992 Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology

    In the 1960s, a German-American computer scientist named Joseph Weizenbaum coded an early version of today’s AI chatbots. Weizenbaum called his program ELIZA, after the “My Fair Lady” character Eliza Doolittle who takes speech lessons (and gets better).

    How people reacted to Weizenbaum’s crude creation tells us almost everything we need to know about AI hype more than half a century later.

    ELIZA could hold basic “conversations,” including playing the role of a psychotherapist with real human users. [In the example above, ELIZA’s responses to one woman are shown in capital letters.]

    Anybody with a cursory awareness of recent headlines about AI romances and AI psychosis already knows where this is going. ELIZA’s human interlocuters in the 1960s, despite talking to a clunky machine they knew had been programmed by Weizenbaum, refused to believe that they were talking to a mere machine. His secretary, having watched him build the contraption over several months, after just a few exchanges with ELIZA, asked Weizenbaum to leave the room so she could have some privacy.

    Weizenbaum, exhibiting a bit of Freudian sangfroid about all this, was not surprised to see people form emotional attachments with inanimate objects. He’d already seen people get attached to their cars or guitars or computers. But “what I had not realized is that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people,” Weizenbaum wrote in his 1976 book “Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation.”…

    … I learned about Weizenbaum’s ELIZA experiment from Neil Postman’s 1992 book “Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology,” a work of technoconservatism that, like Weizenbaum’s writings, was imbued with foresight about our struggles with today’s vastly more powerful technologies.

    Consider this passage from Postman’s “Technopoly”:

    In a technocracy, tools play a central role in the thought-world of the culture. Everything must give way, in some degree, to their development. The social and symbolic worlds become increasingly subject to the requirements of that development. Tools are not integrated into the culture; they attack the culture. They bid to become the culture. As a consequence, tradition, social mores, myth, politics, ritual, and religion have to fight for their lives.

    Technology, attacking and taking over the culture? Bending society to its own imperative for advancement? In my United States of America? Postman (most famous for writing “Amusing Ourselves to Death”) thought the U.S. was the world’s first “Technopoly,” a society marked by “the submission of all forms of cultural life to the sovereignty of technique and technology,” where information itself has become a form of pollution.

    To Postman, “the milieu in which Technopoly flourishes is one in which the tie between information and human purpose has been severed, i.e., information appears indiscriminately, directed at no one in particular, in enormous volume and at high speeds, and disconnected from theory, meaning or purpose.”

    Neil Postman wrote “Technopoly” before the introduction of ChatGPT and Sora; TikTok and YouTube; Twitter and Facebook; Google Search and the Netscape browser. Postman wrote the book before Windows 95 existed. A philosophy of technology that mostly holds up through successive eras of technical revolution has already passed time’s first test, which is for the philosophy to outlive the philosopher. And Postman’s philosophy is ultimately conservative, motivated by the desire to preserve the traditions of humanism, social cohesion and a shareable sense of collective history.

    Technoconservatism was old before it was new. Postman quotes Plato’s “Phaedrus,” where Thamus warns that whoever learns writing (one of our first dangerous technologies) “will cease to exercise their memory and become forgetful” and “will receive a quantity of information without proper instruction, and in consequence be thought very knowledgeable when they are for the most part quite ignorant.” And Postman, to his credit, is like — well, yeah! Writing really did that. A new technology is neither good nor bad, but ecological: it “does not add or subtract something. It changes everything. In the year 1500, fifty years after the printing press was invented, we did not have old Europe plus the printing press. We had a different Europe.”

    In previous generations, societies dealt with information revolutions (which always produced information gluts) by creating institutions that prioritize “good” information and deprioritize the bad; think about schools with their organized curricula, courts with their standards of evidence, newspapers with their party lines or codes of journalistic ethics. But Postman notes that we got lucky after the Gutenberg revolution, when information technology’s development slowed down long enough for societies to catch up and be excellent:

    From the early seventeenth century, when Western culture undertook to reorganize itself to accommodate the printing press, until the mid-nineteenth century [with the invention of the telegraph], no significant technologies were introduced that altered the form, volume, or speed of information. As a consequence, Western culture had more than two hundred years to accustom itself to the new information conditions created by the press. It developed new institutions, such as the school and representative government. It developed new conceptions of knowledge and intelligence, and a heightened respect for reason and privacy. It developed new forms of economic activity, such as mechanized production and corporate capitalism, and even gave articulate expression to the possibilities of a humane socialism. New forms of public discourse came into being through newspapers, pamphlets, broadsides, and books. It is no wonder that the eighteenth century gave us in the work of Goethe, Voltaire, Diderot, Kant, Hume, Adam Smith, Edmund Burke, Vico, Edward Gibbon, and, of course, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton, and Thomas Paine. I weight the list with America’s “Founding Fathers” because technocratic-typographic America was the first nation ever to be argued into existence in print.

    Contrast the luxuriously slow social pace of the Gutenberg era with today’s information development timelines. Over the course of three decades, we’ve seen the rise and now-decline of the open web; the rise and now-decline of social media; the rise of short-form video and the rise of chatbots and synthetic information. All created enormous economic and philosophical disruptions whose fundamental impacts you can’t get a group of people in a room together to describe accurately. Among the disruptions: These increasingly efficient forms of sharing information keep encountering falling test scores; universities are trying to implement AI as their own students use it for cheating or boo the tech at their graduations; people are falling in love with their chatbots, which sometimes tell their users to kill themselves. A society that wants to understand itself probably wouldn’t act like this…

    Read on for how we might — dare one suggest, should— act: “A society that wants to understand itself probably wouldn’t act like this,” from @mattdpearce.com.

    Compare to/contrast with with Yuval Avnar‘s riff on Pascal’s musing on the implications of his invention, the “arithmetic machine” (an early, if not the first, modern mechanical calculator): “The Inventor of the Thinking Machine Didn’t Worry. Neither Should You.

    * Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business

    ###

    As we introspect, we might send pointed birthday greetings to Ambrose Bierce; he was born on this date in 1842. His satirical lexicon The Devil’s Dictionary was named as one of “The 100 Greatest Masterpieces of American Literature” by the American Revolution Bicentennial Administration.  His story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” has been described as “one of the most famous and frequently anthologized stories in American literature”; and his book Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (also published as In the Midst of Life) was named by the Grolier Club as one of the 100 most influential American books printed before 1900.

    A prolific and versatile writer, Bierce was regarded as one of the most influential journalists in the United States, and as a pioneering writer of realist fiction.  For his horror writing, Michael Dirda ranked him alongside Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft.  S. T. Joshi argues that he may well be the greatest satirist America has ever produced, and can take his place with such figures as Juvenal, Swift, and Voltaire.  His war stories influenced Stephen Crane, Ernest Hemingway, and others; and he was an influential and feared literary critic.  In recent decades Bierce has gained even wider regard as a fabulist and for his poetry.

    In 1913, Bierce told reporters that he was travelling to Mexico to gain first-hand experience of the Mexican Revolution. He disappeared over the border and was never seen again. 

    Apropos the piece featured above:

    TELEPHONE, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance.

    – The Devil’s Dictionary

    source

    #AmbroseBierce #business #culture #education #Gutenberg #history #literature #MattPearce #NeilPostman #politics #society #Technology
  15. “The clearest way to see through a culture is to attend to its tools for conversation”*…

    An example of dialogue with an early chatbot, excerpted from from its creator Joseph Weizenbaum’s 1976 book “Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation.”

    Matt Pearce revisits Neil Postman‘s 1992 Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology

    In the 1960s, a German-American computer scientist named Joseph Weizenbaum coded an early version of today’s AI chatbots. Weizenbaum called his program ELIZA, after the “My Fair Lady” character Eliza Doolittle who takes speech lessons (and gets better).

    How people reacted to Weizenbaum’s crude creation tells us almost everything we need to know about AI hype more than half a century later.

    ELIZA could hold basic “conversations,” including playing the role of a psychotherapist with real human users. [In the example above, ELIZA’s responses to one woman are shown in capital letters.]

    Anybody with a cursory awareness of recent headlines about AI romances and AI psychosis already knows where this is going. ELIZA’s human interlocuters in the 1960s, despite talking to a clunky machine they knew had been programmed by Weizenbaum, refused to believe that they were talking to a mere machine. His secretary, having watched him build the contraption over several months, after just a few exchanges with ELIZA, asked Weizenbaum to leave the room so she could have some privacy.

    Weizenbaum, exhibiting a bit of Freudian sangfroid about all this, was not surprised to see people form emotional attachments with inanimate objects. He’d already seen people get attached to their cars or guitars or computers. But “what I had not realized is that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people,” Weizenbaum wrote in his 1976 book “Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation.”…

    … I learned about Weizenbaum’s ELIZA experiment from Neil Postman’s 1992 book “Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology,” a work of technoconservatism that, like Weizenbaum’s writings, was imbued with foresight about our struggles with today’s vastly more powerful technologies.

    Consider this passage from Postman’s “Technopoly”:

    In a technocracy, tools play a central role in the thought-world of the culture. Everything must give way, in some degree, to their development. The social and symbolic worlds become increasingly subject to the requirements of that development. Tools are not integrated into the culture; they attack the culture. They bid to become the culture. As a consequence, tradition, social mores, myth, politics, ritual, and religion have to fight for their lives.

    Technology, attacking and taking over the culture? Bending society to its own imperative for advancement? In my United States of America? Postman (most famous for writing “Amusing Ourselves to Death”) thought the U.S. was the world’s first “Technopoly,” a society marked by “the submission of all forms of cultural life to the sovereignty of technique and technology,” where information itself has become a form of pollution.

    To Postman, “the milieu in which Technopoly flourishes is one in which the tie between information and human purpose has been severed, i.e., information appears indiscriminately, directed at no one in particular, in enormous volume and at high speeds, and disconnected from theory, meaning or purpose.”

    Neil Postman wrote “Technopoly” before the introduction of ChatGPT and Sora; TikTok and YouTube; Twitter and Facebook; Google Search and the Netscape browser. Postman wrote the book before Windows 95 existed. A philosophy of technology that mostly holds up through successive eras of technical revolution has already passed time’s first test, which is for the philosophy to outlive the philosopher. And Postman’s philosophy is ultimately conservative, motivated by the desire to preserve the traditions of humanism, social cohesion and a shareable sense of collective history.

    Technoconservatism was old before it was new. Postman quotes Plato’s “Phaedrus,” where Thamus warns that whoever learns writing (one of our first dangerous technologies) “will cease to exercise their memory and become forgetful” and “will receive a quantity of information without proper instruction, and in consequence be thought very knowledgeable when they are for the most part quite ignorant.” And Postman, to his credit, is like — well, yeah! Writing really did that. A new technology is neither good nor bad, but ecological: it “does not add or subtract something. It changes everything. In the year 1500, fifty years after the printing press was invented, we did not have old Europe plus the printing press. We had a different Europe.”

    In previous generations, societies dealt with information revolutions (which always produced information gluts) by creating institutions that prioritize “good” information and deprioritize the bad; think about schools with their organized curricula, courts with their standards of evidence, newspapers with their party lines or codes of journalistic ethics. But Postman notes that we got lucky after the Gutenberg revolution, when information technology’s development slowed down long enough for societies to catch up and be excellent:

    From the early seventeenth century, when Western culture undertook to reorganize itself to accommodate the printing press, until the mid-nineteenth century [with the invention of the telegraph], no significant technologies were introduced that altered the form, volume, or speed of information. As a consequence, Western culture had more than two hundred years to accustom itself to the new information conditions created by the press. It developed new institutions, such as the school and representative government. It developed new conceptions of knowledge and intelligence, and a heightened respect for reason and privacy. It developed new forms of economic activity, such as mechanized production and corporate capitalism, and even gave articulate expression to the possibilities of a humane socialism. New forms of public discourse came into being through newspapers, pamphlets, broadsides, and books. It is no wonder that the eighteenth century gave us in the work of Goethe, Voltaire, Diderot, Kant, Hume, Adam Smith, Edmund Burke, Vico, Edward Gibbon, and, of course, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Adams, Hamilton, and Thomas Paine. I weight the list with America’s “Founding Fathers” because technocratic-typographic America was the first nation ever to be argued into existence in print.

    Contrast the luxuriously slow social pace of the Gutenberg era with today’s information development timelines. Over the course of three decades, we’ve seen the rise and now-decline of the open web; the rise and now-decline of social media; the rise of short-form video and the rise of chatbots and synthetic information. All created enormous economic and philosophical disruptions whose fundamental impacts you can’t get a group of people in a room together to describe accurately. Among the disruptions: These increasingly efficient forms of sharing information keep encountering falling test scores; universities are trying to implement AI as their own students use it for cheating or boo the tech at their graduations; people are falling in love with their chatbots, which sometimes tell their users to kill themselves. A society that wants to understand itself probably wouldn’t act like this…

    Read on for how we might — dare one suggest, should— act: “A society that wants to understand itself probably wouldn’t act like this,” from @mattdpearce.com.

    Compare to/contrast with with Yuval Avnar‘s riff on Pascal’s musing on the implications of his invention, the “arithmetic machine” (an early, if not the first, modern mechanical calculator): “The Inventor of the Thinking Machine Didn’t Worry. Neither Should You.

    * Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business

    ###

    As we introspect, we might send pointed birthday greetings to Ambrose Bierce; he was born on this date in 1842. His satirical lexicon The Devil’s Dictionary was named as one of “The 100 Greatest Masterpieces of American Literature” by the American Revolution Bicentennial Administration.  His story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” has been described as “one of the most famous and frequently anthologized stories in American literature”; and his book Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (also published as In the Midst of Life) was named by the Grolier Club as one of the 100 most influential American books printed before 1900.

    A prolific and versatile writer, Bierce was regarded as one of the most influential journalists in the United States, and as a pioneering writer of realist fiction.  For his horror writing, Michael Dirda ranked him alongside Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft.  S. T. Joshi argues that he may well be the greatest satirist America has ever produced, and can take his place with such figures as Juvenal, Swift, and Voltaire.  His war stories influenced Stephen Crane, Ernest Hemingway, and others; and he was an influential and feared literary critic.  In recent decades Bierce has gained even wider regard as a fabulist and for his poetry.

    In 1913, Bierce told reporters that he was travelling to Mexico to gain first-hand experience of the Mexican Revolution. He disappeared over the border and was never seen again. 

    Apropos the piece featured above:

    TELEPHONE, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance.

    – The Devil’s Dictionary

    source

    #AmbroseBierce #business #culture #education #Gutenberg #history #literature #MattPearce #NeilPostman #politics #society #Technology
  16. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DICE, n. Small polka-dotted cubes of ivory, constructed like a lawyer to lie on any side, but commonly on the wrong one.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Dice,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-03-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84592…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #dice #lawyer #lying

  17. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DICE, n. Small polka-dotted cubes of ivory, constructed like a lawyer to lie on any side, but commonly on the wrong one.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Dice,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-03-24)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84592…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #dice #lawyer #lying

  18. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DESERVE, n. The quality of being entitled to what somebody else obtains.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Deserve,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-03-03)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/84398…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #avarice #coveting #covetousness #deserve #deserving #entitlement #envy #possession

  19. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DENY, v.t. See Hurl Back The Allegation.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Deny,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-02-17)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83996…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #accusation #allegation #counterattack #denial #deny #project #projection

  20. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    CULPRIT, n. The other fellow.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Culprit,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-10-28)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83834…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #accusation #culprit #fingerpointing #guilt #perpetrator #wrongdoer #perspective

  21. Pray, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled on behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Prayer

    #Photography #Panorama #Panopainting #Driftwood #Florida

  22. Pray, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled on behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Prayer

    #Photography #Panorama #Panopainting #Driftwood #Florida

  23. "Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing."

    ~ Ambrose Bierce, born today, 1842.

    #AmbroseBierce #Today #Quote #Philosophy

  24. "Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing."

    ~ Ambrose Bierce, born today, 1842.

    #AmbroseBierce #Today #Quote #Philosophy

  25. RELIGION: A goodly tree, in which all the foul birds of the air have made their nests. - Ambrose Bierce, 'The Devil's Dicionary' #BookWormSat #AmbroseBierce #satire

  26. RELIGION: A goodly tree, in which all the foul birds of the air have made their nests. - Ambrose Bierce, 'The Devil's Dicionary' #BookWormSat #AmbroseBierce #satire

  27. Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Fear #Hope #Religion #TheUnknown

    #Photography #Panorama #Dinosaur #Tracks #Colorado

  28. Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Fear #Hope #Religion #TheUnknown

    #Photography #Panorama #Dinosaur #Tracks #Colorado

  29. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DEMAGOGUE, n. A political opponent.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Demagogue,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-01-20)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83994…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #demagogue #demagoguery #opponent #opposition #politics #populist #rabblerousing #mobrule #emotionalism

  30. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    DEMAGOGUE, n. A political opponent.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Demagogue,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1882-01-20)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83994…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #demagogue #demagoguery #opponent #opposition #politics #populist #rabblerousing #mobrule #emotionalism

  31. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    COVET, v.i. To desire that which the owner wickedly withholds.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Covet,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-10-07)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83831…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #covet #deserving #desire #ownership #perspective

  32. Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Politics

    #Photography #Panorama #MississippiRiver #PikesPeak #Iowa

  33. Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Politics

    #Photography #Panorama #MississippiRiver #PikesPeak #Iowa

  34. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    CORRUPT, adj. In politics, holding an office of trust or profit.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Corrupt,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-10-07)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83706…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #corruption #office #politicalcorruption #politics #publicoffice #publictrust

  35. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    CORRUPT, adj. In politics, holding an office of trust or profit.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Corrupt,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-10-07)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83706…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #corruption #office #politicalcorruption #politics #publicoffice #publictrust

  36. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    CONGREGATION, n. The subjects of an experiment in hypnotism.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Congregation,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-08-12)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83549…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #church #congregation #hypnotism #persuasion

  37. A quotation from Ambrose Pierce

    CONCEIT, n. Self-respect in one whom we dislike.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Conceit,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-08-12)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83247…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #conceit #ego #perspective #pride #selfcenteredness #selfrespect

  38. A quotation from Ambrose Pierce

    CONCEIT, n. Self-respect in one whom we dislike.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Conceit,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-08-12)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/83247…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #conceit #ego #perspective #pride #selfcenteredness #selfrespect

  39. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    BOOK-LEARNING, n. The dunce’s derisive term for all knowledge that transcends his own impenitent ignorance.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Book-learning,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-05-14)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/82789…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #antiintellectualism #booklearning #books #dolt #dunce #education #ignorance #knowledge #learning #willfulignorance

  40. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    BALOGNA-SAUSAGE, n. A dead dog that is better than a living lion, but not to eat.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Bologna-sausage,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-05-14)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/82787…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #baloney #bologna #edible #food #sausage

  41. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    BALLOT, n. A simple device by which a majority proves to a minority the folly of resistance. Many worthy persons of imperfect thinking apparatus believe that majorities govern through some inherent right; and minorities submit, not because they must, but because they ought.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Ballot,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1881-04-23)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/82483…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #ballot #democracy #majority #minority #populargovernment #popularopinion #tyrannyofthemajority #voting

  42. Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Fear #Hope #Religion #TheUnknown

    #Photography #Panorama #Rainbow #MississippiRiver #Iowa

  43. Fear has no brains; it is an idiot... bearing dismal witness and cowardly counsel.
    -- Ambrose Bierce

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Fear

    #Photography #Panorama #Dinosaur #Tracks #Colorado

  44. Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Fear #Hope #Religion #TheUnknown

    #Photography #Panorama #Canyon #SlickRock #IcebergCanyon #LakePowell #Utah

  45. A quotation from Ambrose Bierce

    INCORPORATION, n. The act of uniting several persons into one fiction called a corporation, in order that they may be no longer responsible for its actions. A, B and C are a corporation. A robs, B steals and C (it is necessary that there be one gentleman in the concern) cheats. It is a plundering, thieving, swindling corporation. But A, B and C, who have jointly determined and severally executed every crime of the corporation, are blameless. It is wrong to mention them by name when censuring their acts as a corporation, but right when praising.

    Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914?) American writer and journalist
    “Incorporation,” “Devil’s Dictionary” column, San Francisco Wasp (1885-10-03)

    More about this quote: wist.info/bierce-ambrose/81536…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #ambrosebierce #devilsdictionary #accountability #bigbusiness #blame #business #corporation #crime #criminality #incorporation #irresponsibility #legalfiction #liability #unaccountability

  46. Education, n. That which discloses the wise and disguises from the foolish their lack of understanding.
    -- Ambrose Bierce (The Devil's Dictionary)

    #Wisdom #Quotes #AmbroseBierce #Education

    #Photography #Panorama #LakePowell #SlickRock #Canyon #Utah