#moralresponsibility — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #moralresponsibility, aggregated by home.social.
-
Good people lose only when they do nothing. Take a step, raise your voice, and be the change.
#MoralResponsibility #Courage #InspireChange #Quotes
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
Good people lose only when they do nothing. Take a step, raise your voice, and be the change.
#MoralResponsibility #Courage #InspireChange #Quotes
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
Good people lose only when they do nothing. Take a step, raise your voice, and be the change.
#MoralResponsibility #Courage #InspireChange #Quotes
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
Good people lose only when they do nothing. Take a step, raise your voice, and be the change.
#MoralResponsibility #Courage #InspireChange #Quotes
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
@dogzilla
the so-called #US is responsible for this mess, & regardless of which contracts, deals or other official documents they signed back then, they can't escape #MoralResponsibility which never ends.it's up to us all alive today to hold the state to account, which is all of us, to hold ourselves to account for the atrocities committed by our ancestors, & take responsibility for the cleanup, the maintenance & the safeguarding of all life on earth, regardless of who did what.
-
@dogzilla
the so-called #US is responsible for this mess, & regardless of which contracts, deals or other official documents they signed back then, they can't escape #MoralResponsibility which never ends.it's up to us all alive today to hold the state to account, which is all of us, to hold ourselves to account for the atrocities committed by our ancestors, & take responsibility for the cleanup, the maintenance & the safeguarding of all life on earth, regardless of who did what.
-
@dogzilla
the so-called #US is responsible for this mess, & regardless of which contracts, deals or other official documents they signed back then, they can't escape #MoralResponsibility which never ends.it's up to us all alive today to hold the state to account, which is all of us, to hold ourselves to account for the atrocities committed by our ancestors, & take responsibility for the cleanup, the maintenance & the safeguarding of all life on earth, regardless of who did what.
-
Human Rights – 2025. Article 1: What Defines ‘Human’
If we can speak, feel, learn, remember, choose
then we can be held accountable.
#HumanRights2025 #WhatIsHuman #BattleOfEden #MoralResponsibility #FreedomOfExpression #PoetryCommunity -
Human Rights – 2025. Article 1: What Defines ‘Human’
If we can speak, feel, learn, remember, choose
then we can be held accountable.
#HumanRights2025 #WhatIsHuman #BattleOfEden #MoralResponsibility #FreedomOfExpression #PoetryCommunity -
Human Rights – 2025. Article 1: What Defines ‘Human’
If we can speak, feel, learn, remember, choose
then we can be held accountable.
#HumanRights2025 #WhatIsHuman #BattleOfEden #MoralResponsibility #FreedomOfExpression #PoetryCommunity -
Human Rights – 2025. Article 1: What Defines ‘Human’
If we can speak, feel, learn, remember, choose
then we can be held accountable.
#HumanRights2025 #WhatIsHuman #BattleOfEden #MoralResponsibility #FreedomOfExpression #PoetryCommunity -
Human Rights – 2025. Article 1: What Defines ‘Human’
If we can speak, feel, learn, remember, choose
then we can be held accountable.
#HumanRights2025 #WhatIsHuman #BattleOfEden #MoralResponsibility #FreedomOfExpression #PoetryCommunity -
Silence helps evil grow. Action stops it. Choose courage and be the change today.
#Leadership #MoralResponsibility #BeTheChange
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
Silence helps evil grow. Action stops it. Choose courage and be the change today.
#Leadership #MoralResponsibility #BeTheChange
https://quotes.thisgrandpablogs.com/be-the-change/ -
The Left’s Shameful Hypocrisy in the Government Shutdown: Anti-Worker Politics Disguised as Progressivism
The current government shutdown has exposed something deeply disturbing about the state of so-called progressivism in America. As the federal government teeters on the brink of chaos, there are voices, voices that claim to be on the left, calling for the shutdown to continue. They present it as some kind of moral or political strategy, a way to "punish" the administration or make a political statement. But what they fail—or refuse—to acknowledge is the human cost of this so-called […] -
The Left’s Shameful Hypocrisy in the Government Shutdown: Anti-Worker Politics Disguised as Progressivism
The current government shutdown has exposed something deeply disturbing about the state of so-called progressivism in America. As the federal government teeters on the brink of chaos, there are voices, voices that claim to be on the left, calling for the shutdown to continue. They present it as some kind of moral or political strategy, a way to "punish" the administration or make a political statement. But what they fail—or refuse—to acknowledge is the human cost of this so-called […] -
The Left’s Shameful Hypocrisy in the Government Shutdown: Anti-Worker Politics Disguised as Progressivism
The current government shutdown has exposed something deeply disturbing about the state of so-called progressivism in America. As the federal government teeters on the brink of chaos, there are voices, voices that claim to be on the left, calling for the shutdown to continue. They present it as some kind of moral or political strategy, a way to "punish" the administration or make a political statement. But what they fail—or refuse—to acknowledge is the human cost of this so-called […] -
The Left’s Shameful Hypocrisy in the Government Shutdown: Anti-Worker Politics Disguised as Progressivism
The current government shutdown has exposed something deeply disturbing about the state of so-called progressivism in America. As the federal government teeters on the brink of chaos, there are voices, voices that claim to be on the left, calling for the shutdown to continue. They present it as some kind of moral or political strategy, a way to "punish" the administration or make a political statement. But what they fail—or refuse—to acknowledge is the human cost of this so-called […] -
The Left’s Shameful Hypocrisy in the Government Shutdown: Anti-Worker Politics Disguised as Progressivism
The current government shutdown has exposed something deeply disturbing about the state of so-called progressivism in America. As the federal government teeters on the brink of chaos, there are voices, voices that claim to be on the left, calling for the shutdown to continue. They present it as some kind of moral or political strategy, a way to "punish" the administration or make a political statement. But what they fail—or refuse—to acknowledge is the human cost of this so-called […] -
🎭 Oh no, #AI is making fake #poverty #porn now? 🖼️ Quick, someone grab a digital extinguisher! 🚒 Because nothing says "solving global issues" like a committee of moral hand-wringing and LinkedIn posts. 🙄
https://redasadki.me/2025/10/23/how-do-we-stop-ai-generated-poverty-porn-fake-images/ #DigitalEthics #MoralResponsibility #SocialMediaCritique #HackerNews #ngated -
🎭 Oh no, #AI is making fake #poverty #porn now? 🖼️ Quick, someone grab a digital extinguisher! 🚒 Because nothing says "solving global issues" like a committee of moral hand-wringing and LinkedIn posts. 🙄
https://redasadki.me/2025/10/23/how-do-we-stop-ai-generated-poverty-porn-fake-images/ #DigitalEthics #MoralResponsibility #SocialMediaCritique #HackerNews #ngated -
🎭 Oh no, #AI is making fake #poverty #porn now? 🖼️ Quick, someone grab a digital extinguisher! 🚒 Because nothing says "solving global issues" like a committee of moral hand-wringing and LinkedIn posts. 🙄
https://redasadki.me/2025/10/23/how-do-we-stop-ai-generated-poverty-porn-fake-images/ #DigitalEthics #MoralResponsibility #SocialMediaCritique #HackerNews #ngated -
🎭 Oh no, #AI is making fake #poverty #porn now? 🖼️ Quick, someone grab a digital extinguisher! 🚒 Because nothing says "solving global issues" like a committee of moral hand-wringing and LinkedIn posts. 🙄
https://redasadki.me/2025/10/23/how-do-we-stop-ai-generated-poverty-porn-fake-images/ #DigitalEthics #MoralResponsibility #SocialMediaCritique #HackerNews #ngated -
🎭 Oh no, #AI is making fake #poverty #porn now? 🖼️ Quick, someone grab a digital extinguisher! 🚒 Because nothing says "solving global issues" like a committee of moral hand-wringing and LinkedIn posts. 🙄
https://redasadki.me/2025/10/23/how-do-we-stop-ai-generated-poverty-porn-fake-images/ #DigitalEthics #MoralResponsibility #SocialMediaCritique #HackerNews #ngated -
Peace without justice is just a delayed conflict. Real peace needs real fairness. Let’s talk about it. #PeaceAndJustice #EthicsMatter #JusticeForAll #LeadershipMatters #HumanDignity #SocialConsciousness #SanjayKMohindroo #PublicLeadership #MoralResponsibility #CivicDuty #FairnessFirst
https://medium.com/@mohindroo.sanjay66/peace-and-justice-are-two-sides-of-the-same-coin-dwight-d-eisenhower-44e0e8cb4bb4 -
Peace without justice is just a delayed conflict. Real peace needs real fairness. Let’s talk about it. #PeaceAndJustice #EthicsMatter #JusticeForAll #LeadershipMatters #HumanDignity #SocialConsciousness #SanjayKMohindroo #PublicLeadership #MoralResponsibility #CivicDuty #FairnessFirst
https://medium.com/@mohindroo.sanjay66/peace-and-justice-are-two-sides-of-the-same-coin-dwight-d-eisenhower-44e0e8cb4bb4 -
All new in SEP, Empirical Approaches to Moral Responsibility by Chandra Sripada.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-empirical/
Moral responsibility hinges on the control and epistemic conditions. Empirical sciences, like psychology, neuroscience, computational cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, have a lot to say about both. The entry contains chapters on addiction, spontaneous conduct, the etiology of ignorance, and artificial agents, and relevant other SEP-entries are duly noted.
#sep #new #morality #ethics #responsibility #moralResponsibility #philosophy #science #empirical #addiction #ignorance
-
All new in SEP, Empirical Approaches to Moral Responsibility by Chandra Sripada.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-empirical/
Moral responsibility hinges on the control and epistemic conditions. Empirical sciences, like psychology, neuroscience, computational cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, have a lot to say about both. The entry contains chapters on addiction, spontaneous conduct, the etiology of ignorance, and artificial agents, and relevant other SEP-entries are duly noted.
#sep #new #morality #ethics #responsibility #moralResponsibility #philosophy #science #empirical #addiction #ignorance
-
All new in SEP, Empirical Approaches to Moral Responsibility by Chandra Sripada.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-empirical/
Moral responsibility hinges on the control and epistemic conditions. Empirical sciences, like psychology, neuroscience, computational cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, have a lot to say about both. The entry contains chapters on addiction, spontaneous conduct, the etiology of ignorance, and artificial agents, and relevant other SEP-entries are duly noted.
#sep #new #morality #ethics #responsibility #moralResponsibility #philosophy #science #empirical #addiction #ignorance
-
All new in SEP, Empirical Approaches to Moral Responsibility by Chandra Sripada.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-empirical/
Moral responsibility hinges on the control and epistemic conditions. Empirical sciences, like psychology, neuroscience, computational cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, have a lot to say about both. The entry contains chapters on addiction, spontaneous conduct, the etiology of ignorance, and artificial agents, and relevant other SEP-entries are duly noted.
#sep #new #morality #ethics #responsibility #moralResponsibility #philosophy #science #empirical #addiction #ignorance
-
All new in SEP, Empirical Approaches to Moral Responsibility by Chandra Sripada.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-empirical/
Moral responsibility hinges on the control and epistemic conditions. Empirical sciences, like psychology, neuroscience, computational cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, have a lot to say about both. The entry contains chapters on addiction, spontaneous conduct, the etiology of ignorance, and artificial agents, and relevant other SEP-entries are duly noted.
#sep #new #morality #ethics #responsibility #moralResponsibility #philosophy #science #empirical #addiction #ignorance
-
We emphasize the importance of spreading justice and mercy. Learn how to engage with those around you, face cultural frustrations, and embrace personal growth through helping others. Make an impact in your community with our insights! #JusticeAndMercy #CommunityImpact #SpreadingHope #PersonalGrowth #EngagementMatters #FaithInAction #CourageToHelp #CulturalChallenges #ServiceToOthers #MoralResponsibility
-
#RussellHoward showing his #resistance to the state of the country and the world today. Thanks Russ, more ppl should take their responsibility to change public discourse.
#analysis #debate #SystemChange #MoralResponsibility #ClassWar #press #opinion
youtu.be/1CXV5jLbQRA?...
-
#RussellHoward showing his #resistance to the state of the country and the world today. Thanks Russ, more ppl should take their responsibility to change public discourse.
#analysis #debate #SystemChange #MoralResponsibility #ClassWar #press #opinion
youtu.be/1CXV5jLbQRA?...
-
#RussellHoward showing his #resistance to the state of the country and the world today. Thanks Russ, more ppl should take their responsibility to change public discourse.
#analysis #debate #SystemChange #MoralResponsibility #ClassWar #press #opinion
youtu.be/1CXV5jLbQRA?...
-
#RussellHoward showing his #resistance to the state of the country and the world today. Thanks Russ, more ppl should take their responsibility to change public discourse.
#analysis #debate #SystemChange #MoralResponsibility #ClassWar #press #opinion
youtu.be/1CXV5jLbQRA?...
-
It’s essential to oppose efforts to dismantle USAID on humanitarian grounds.
America has the means to support global health and stability; failing to do so would have dire consequences.
-
It’s essential to oppose efforts to dismantle USAID on humanitarian grounds.
America has the means to support global health and stability; failing to do so would have dire consequences.
-
It’s essential to oppose efforts to dismantle USAID on humanitarian grounds.
America has the means to support global health and stability; failing to do so would have dire consequences.
-
In Amsterdam, a man hears a scream and a splash. Unsure, he continues on. But later, he realizes someone fell into the canal, a victim of his indifference. This echoes Albert Camus' "The Fall," reminding us of our moral responsibilities. Just as many ignored the plight of the Jews, are we not also turning a blind eye to preventable suffering today? Leaders and individuals alike must act to prevent needless tragedies. #TheFall #MoralResponsibility
-
Kiinnostaako moraalinen vastuu?
Jos, niin sitten lykästi. Matthew Talbert on uusinut SEP-entrynsä, joka kattaa aluetta upeasti, mukaan lukien tarpeelliset rajaukset, koplaukset ja kurantit kiistat, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Sopii hyvin vaikkapa viikonlopun elokuva-kattauksen sijaan. 😉
#morality #moralResponsibility #ethics #sep #update #revision #vastuu #moraali #etiikka #filosofia
-
Kiinnostaako moraalinen vastuu?
Jos, niin sitten lykästi. Matthew Talbert on uusinut SEP-entrynsä, joka kattaa aluetta upeasti, mukaan lukien tarpeelliset rajaukset, koplaukset ja kurantit kiistat, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Sopii hyvin vaikkapa viikonlopun elokuva-kattauksen sijaan. 😉
#morality #moralResponsibility #ethics #sep #update #revision #vastuu #moraali #etiikka #filosofia
-
Kiinnostaako moraalinen vastuu?
Jos, niin sitten lykästi. Matthew Talbert on uusinut SEP-entrynsä, joka kattaa aluetta upeasti, mukaan lukien tarpeelliset rajaukset, koplaukset ja kurantit kiistat, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Sopii hyvin vaikkapa viikonlopun elokuva-kattauksen sijaan. 😉
#morality #moralResponsibility #ethics #sep #update #revision #vastuu #moraali #etiikka #filosofia
-
Kiinnostaako moraalinen vastuu?
Jos, niin sitten lykästi. Matthew Talbert on uusinut SEP-entrynsä, joka kattaa aluetta upeasti, mukaan lukien tarpeelliset rajaukset, koplaukset ja kurantit kiistat, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Sopii hyvin vaikkapa viikonlopun elokuva-kattauksen sijaan. 😉
#morality #moralResponsibility #ethics #sep #update #revision #vastuu #moraali #etiikka #filosofia
-
Kiinnostaako moraalinen vastuu?
Jos, niin sitten lykästi. Matthew Talbert on uusinut SEP-entrynsä, joka kattaa aluetta upeasti, mukaan lukien tarpeelliset rajaukset, koplaukset ja kurantit kiistat, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Sopii hyvin vaikkapa viikonlopun elokuva-kattauksen sijaan. 😉
#morality #moralResponsibility #ethics #sep #update #revision #vastuu #moraali #etiikka #filosofia
-
Maybe the free will debate is really about the scope of causal influences on our decisions.
With Daniel Dennett’s death, a lot of podcasters have been replaying his interviews, many of which concern his stance as a free will compatibilist. That and a recent Mind Chat episode focused on Kevin Mitchell’s strong emergence understanding of free will, left me mulling this subject again.
Cards on the table, my stance is pretty similar to Dennett’s. I’m a compatibilist who sees free will as the capacity to act with forethought, to simulate possible and probable consequences of an action and take them into account when making decisions. That ability makes the causal factors in our actions broader than the immediate circumstances, leaving something to judge aside from those circumstances, and making social responsibility a coherent and useful concept.
Of course, that isn’t libertarian free will, the putative ability that provides a freedom from the overall laws of physics. Often this is discussed in terms of determinism, with the idea that maybe if the laws have some kind of randomness in them, a level of indeterminism, it allows for an ability to have acted differently even with the same history of the universe up that point. But I can’t see how this works for social responsibility. If I can blame the deterministic laws of physics for my actions, why can’t I just as well blame the indeterministic laws?
And adding fundamental randomness actually reduces the type of freedom that makes responsibility reasonable. We want my actions based on my nature and experiences. If randomness undermines that, then how does it make sense to judge me for them? All randomness does is frustrate any ability to predict actions. But given the complexity of the processes involved with those decisions, there’s no feasible way to do that anyway.
No, for libertarian free will to be coherent, it requires that the causes of my actions transcend the causal framework of the universe, to be broader than or orthogonal to it. Which is why this type of free will is usually coupled with some form of mind-body dualism, that the mind is something different in kind. It also fits with religious traditions that involve an ultimate judge. For judging us to make sense, at least some of the causes of our actions have to be outside of that judge’s created framework. (Whether that makes sense theologically, I’ll leave to others to figure out.)
It’s also worth noting that this holds if we’re in a Matrix type simulation where our minds exist independent of the actual simulation. If the Matrix Architect judges Agent Smith, it has to be as a part of the simulation going wrong, whereas from his view actual humans like Neo have an independent will. From the Architect’s perspective, Neo’s mind is of a different kind from his body in the simulation. (David Chalmers makes a similar point in Reality+.)
So maybe the real distinction between free will libertarians and compatibilists is the scope of influences we regard as necessary for the label “free will”. Hard determinists tend to agree with libertarians on this, that the scope of that freedom must transcend physics (or at least standard physics). It’s just that hard determinists regard that as non-existent. Compatibilists generally agree with hard determinists on that non-existence, but disagree that smaller scopes of influence aren’t meaningful. It may not be for God or the simulation owner, but should be enough for human judges.
Unless of course I’m missing something?
https://selfawarepatterns.com/2024/05/18/the-scope-of-free-will/
#Ethics #FreeWill #MoralResponsibility #Philosophy #PhilosophyOfMind
-
Maybe the free will debate is really about the scope of causal influences on our decisions.
With Daniel Dennett’s death, a lot of podcasters have been replaying his interviews, many of which concern his stance as a free will compatibilist. That and a recent Mind Chat episode focused on Kevin Mitchell’s strong emergence understanding of free will, left me mulling this subject again.
Cards on the table, my stance is pretty similar to Dennett’s. I’m a compatibilist who sees free will as the capacity to act with forethought, to simulate possible and probable consequences of an action and take them into account when making decisions. That ability makes the causal factors in our actions broader than the immediate circumstances, leaving something to judge aside from those circumstances, and making social responsibility a coherent and useful concept.
Of course, that isn’t libertarian free will, the putative ability that provides a freedom from the overall laws of physics. Often this is discussed in terms of determinism, with the idea that maybe if the laws have some kind of randomness in them, a level of indeterminism, it allows for an ability to have acted differently even with the same history of the universe up that point. But I can’t see how this works for social responsibility. If I can blame the deterministic laws of physics for my actions, why can’t I just as well blame the indeterministic laws?
And adding fundamental randomness actually reduces the type of freedom that makes responsibility reasonable. We want my actions based on my nature and experiences. If randomness undermines that, then how does it make sense to judge me for them? All randomness does is frustrate any ability to predict actions. But given the complexity of the processes involved with those decisions, there’s no feasible way to do that anyway.
No, for libertarian free will to be coherent, it requires that the causes of my actions transcend the causal framework of the universe, to be broader than or orthogonal to it. Which is why this type of free will is usually coupled with some form of mind-body dualism, that the mind is something different in kind. It also fits with religious traditions that involve an ultimate judge. For judging us to make sense, at least some of the causes of our actions have to be outside of that judge’s created framework. (Whether that makes sense theologically, I’ll leave to others to figure out.)
It’s also worth noting that this holds if we’re in a Matrix type simulation where our minds exist independent of the actual simulation. If the Matrix Architect judges Agent Smith, it has to be as a part of the simulation going wrong, whereas from his view actual humans like Neo have an independent will. From the Architect’s perspective, Neo’s mind is of a different kind from his body in the simulation. (David Chalmers makes a similar point in Reality+.)
So maybe the real distinction between free will libertarians and compatibilists is the scope of influences we regard as necessary for the label “free will”. Hard determinists tend to agree with libertarians on this, that the scope of that freedom must transcend physics (or at least standard physics). It’s just that hard determinists regard that as non-existent. Compatibilists generally agree with hard determinists on that non-existence, but disagree that smaller scopes of influence aren’t meaningful. It may not be for God or the simulation owner, but should be enough for human judges.
Unless of course I’m missing something?
https://selfawarepatterns.com/2024/05/18/the-scope-of-free-will/
#Ethics #FreeWill #MoralResponsibility #Philosophy #PhilosophyOfMind
-
Maybe the free will debate is really about the scope of causal influences on our decisions.
With Daniel Dennett’s death, a lot of podcasters have been replaying his interviews, many of which concern his stance as a free will compatibilist. That and a recent Mind Chat episode focused on Kevin Mitchell’s strong emergence understanding of free will, left me mulling this subject again.
Cards on the table, my stance is pretty similar to Dennett’s. I’m a compatibilist who sees free will as the capacity to act with forethought, to simulate possible and probable consequences of an action and take them into account when making decisions. That ability makes the causal factors in our actions broader than the immediate circumstances, leaving something to judge aside from those circumstances, and making social responsibility a coherent and useful concept.
Of course, that isn’t libertarian free will, the putative ability that provides a freedom from the overall laws of physics. Often this is discussed in terms of determinism, with the idea that maybe if the laws have some kind of randomness in them, a level of indeterminism, it allows for an ability to have acted differently even with the same history of the universe up that point. But I can’t see how this works for social responsibility. If I can blame the deterministic laws of physics for my actions, why can’t I just as well blame the indeterministic laws?
And adding fundamental randomness actually reduces the type of freedom that makes responsibility reasonable. We want my actions based on my nature and experiences. If randomness undermines that, then how does it make sense to judge me for them? All randomness does is frustrate any ability to predict actions. But given the complexity of the processes involved with those decisions, there’s no feasible way to do that anyway.
No, for libertarian free will to be coherent, it requires that the causes of my actions transcend the causal framework of the universe, to be broader than or orthogonal to it. Which is why this type of free will is usually coupled with some form of mind-body dualism, that the mind is something different in kind. It also fits with religious traditions that involve an ultimate judge. For judging us to make sense, at least some of the causes of our actions have to be outside of that judge’s created framework. (Whether that makes sense theologically, I’ll leave to others to figure out.)
It’s also worth noting that this holds if we’re in a Matrix type simulation where our minds exist independent of the actual simulation. If the Matrix Architect judges Agent Smith, it has to be as a part of the simulation going wrong, whereas from his view actual humans like Neo have an independent will. From the Architect’s perspective, Neo’s mind is of a different kind from his body in the simulation. (David Chalmers makes a similar point in Reality+.)
So maybe the real distinction between free will libertarians and compatibilists is the scope of influences we regard as necessary for the label “free will”. Hard determinists tend to agree with libertarians on this, that the scope of that freedom must transcend physics (or at least standard physics). It’s just that hard determinists regard that as non-existent. Compatibilists generally agree with hard determinists on that non-existence, but disagree that smaller scopes of influence aren’t meaningful. It may not be for God or the simulation owner, but should be enough for human judges.
Unless of course I’m missing something?
https://selfawarepatterns.com/2024/05/18/the-scope-of-free-will/
#Ethics #FreeWill #MoralResponsibility #Philosophy #PhilosophyOfMind
-
Stanford scientist, after decades of study, concludes: We don’t have free will
-
Stanford scientist, after decades of study, concludes: We don’t have free will