The Probability Broach: Nuke the moon
Killed by nukes: bad. Killed by guns: A-OK!
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/06/26/tpb-nuke-the-moon/
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #libertarianism, aggregated by home.social.
The Probability Broach: Nuke the moon
Killed by nukes: bad. Killed by guns: A-OK!
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/06/26/tpb-nuke-the-moon/
#Antifa 's activism i.e. aggressive violence, political intimidation or #ochlarchy (mob rule), inadvertently serves the far-right and fascist movements by supplying #propaganda, opportunities to claim victimhood, and pretexts for greater top-down #authoritarianism. Such reactionary tactics reinforce a counter-revolutionary movement downwards towards authoritarianism and #fascism, rather than upwards towards #libertarianism, horizontal organization, and real bottom-up #democracy.
"... European federalism is mostly a left-wing, progressive movement. Some of its biggest advocates, such as Jürgen Habermas, have advanced it as being both a pacifist project and a way of taming free markets. Libertarians cannot get behind such a vision, but it is not—or does not have to be—the only one. ..."
#Libertarianism #EuropeanFederalism #Federalisation #Europe #EU #Transnationalism #Politics
https://www.thenewfederalist.eu/libertarians-should-be-european-federalists
The Probability Broach: Whistle blowers
Why private property untempered by any other consideration is a bad idea.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/06/19/tpb-whistle-blowers/
Long post
Edit: I'm appending more examples from the bottom of the list so you can review your favourite/boost
I often get the feeling that most of you would unfollow if you read all my posts and replies and honestly I'm fine with that so I'm going to just state a bunch of my controversial opinions now to rip off the bandaid
Eating other animals is murder and paying for their flesh and secretions is the same as hiring an assassin
Billions of land animals are killed every year for human taste preference (trillions if you count weight estimates from sea creatures): there is no greater injustice past or present and there is therefore little to no suffering that could possibly fall upon humans as a result of correcting this that would ever not be worth it.
Dogs and cats can be vegan with supplemented diets for taurine for example
Its in my bio but the bible and the quran both advocate killing queer people so there is no way to call them good sources of morality.
Speciesist language that establishes a moral hierarchy of species or perpetuates depersonalizing or deindividualizing stereotypes are harmful and there is no good reason to use them: such as chicken pig weasel dog cow snake rat inhuman, "animal" (as insult or as a way to imply humans aren't animals) many such examples dm for a long txt
Sex negative language hurts women and queer people most such as fuck, blow/suck, dick, pussy, jerk-off, slut/tart/whore
White supremacy, patriarchy, cisheteromononormativity, ageism and ableism are real. Representation matters.
Children can be trans and they deserve gender affirming care especially hormone blockers which are themselves the compromise in this discussion as they are reversible
Children are widely regarded as property, status symbols or as a pets to satisfy the parent's desires and generally speaking aren't given enough rights for example freedom of association freedom of speech freedom of movement
Schools are prisons designed to instill unquestioning obedience to arbitrary authority more than anything else. They teach children that their free time is never truly theirs that they should be dedicating their life to the institution that knowledge and truth comes from authority not inquiry and, in schools with uniforms, that self expression is dangerous and will be punished
Borders kill for no good reason, they don't stop international crime but they do prevent periphery citizens from attempting to flee to the imperial core that is pillaging them. It is far easier for a citizen of the imperial core to get a passport almost anywhere in the world than it is for someone in the periphery to get a visa in the imperial core. Borders are the primary cause of modern slavery.
Any citizen of a country in the imperial core is a beneficiary of neocolonialism.
The vast majority of people believe one or more of the justifying myths of kyriarchy, by that I mean that they have beliefs that are either white supremacist human supermacist misogynist ableist queermisic ageist cisheteromononormative etc.
Private property is theft. Here I am using the socialist definition of private property: when your boss takes a tax off your work and gives you back a fraction of the value you create that is theft
Money in any system creates an exponential power imbalance and will lead to systems of domination
Actually private cryptocurrency like Monero XMR (not bitcoin or ethereum) is a reasonable engagement with money for anarchist praxis and as an anti surveillence and anti censorship technique
There is no justifiable use case for generative AI in programming or as part of any other creative output
Signal App is not censorship resistant or anonymous enough to facilitate revolutionary organization and something decentralized like SimpleX, Cwtch or Briar is preferable.
I2P>Tor (for hosting hidden servers) as its more censorship resistant
Hierarchical organization will produce societies with hierarchical power structures and is antithetical to the ideals of socialism: ie: marxism leninism is wrong and counter productive and you should all be anarchists.
Israel has no right to exist, nor does any country, but israel is built on colonialism and genocide just like the United States of America, Austrailia, New Zealand, South Africa etc. and as such israel shot first. There is no moral equivalence between genocidal violence and liberatory armed resistance.
Psychiatry as a field is first and foremost an immune response from kyriarchy to individualize social problems and medicalize anti authoritarian tendancies. https://veganism.social/@ambiguous_yelp/115905636752429264
Pets exist for the benefit of humans not non-humans who have their reproduction controlled and monitored for profit and are separated from their families kept in isolation a lot of the time and punished for displaying natural behaviours or for having mental health problems.
Sex work deserves no less respect than modelling or athleticism.
Pornography and masturbation doesn't atrophy your brain you fell for a christian misinformation campaign
Pedophiles need therapy, killing them or putting them in prison just discourages people from getting help
Drug addiction is a health issue and largely a matter of bodily autonomy especially when done in private. Criminalizing drugs makes the drugs themself and accessing them more dangerous and discourages people from seeking professional help
Prisons are universities of crime and countries that focus on rehabilitation have lowest recidivism rates
#Vegan #Veganism #HumanSupremacy #Cats #Dogs #Bible #Quran #Queermisia #Chicken #Pig #Weasel #Cow #Snake #Rat #SexNegativity #Patriarchy #Kyriarchy #WhiteSupremacy #Cisheteromononormativity #Ageism #Ableism #Transgender #YouthLiberation #AntiSchool #NoBorders #Colonialism #ImperialCore #Periphery #Passport #ModernSlavery #NeoColonialism #Misogyny #PrivateProperty #Capitalism #AntiMoney #Cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Monero #XMR #AntiCensorship #AntiSurveilance #Praxis #GenAI #AISlop #NoAI #AI #VibeCoding #Programming #Signal #SignalApp #SimpleXChat #SimpleX #Cwtch #CwtchChat #Briar #BriarMessenger #I2P #Tor #Anarchism #MarxismLeninism #Israel #Zionism #AntiZionism #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Australia #NewZealand #SouthAfrica #Psychiatry #AntiPsychiatry #Authoritarianism #AntiAuthoritarianism #Libertarianism #LibertarianSocialism #LeftLibertarianism #Pets #Pornography #Porn #Masturbation
RE: https://fairy.id/@Linux/117355539298201254
You all think MAGA is crazy? --- Let me tell you about Libertarians.
These people would privatize both roads and sidewalks, so that every time you take a step out your front door you'd be paying a toll. They're so pro-corporate that I once heard a debate where they were arguing the merits of charging people to breathe fresh air and drink water too.
Do you want to have no consent laws? These people are pro-rape, pro-incest, pro-child bride, and believe women are property. In fact, some of them believe you should have the right to "claim" a wife as you see fit. Can you imagine walking, minding your own business, and some random dude pronouncing he's claimed you, and now you're his? They're also very big on multiple wives and large families too.
Ethnic cleansing? Listen to a Libertarian telling you how we should have selective breeding programs and selective sterilization too. These people watched the movie "The Purge" and thought that was a good idea.
Their only debate regarding the LGBTQ+ community is whether there is more value in "reeducation" or putting them in gas chambers, which they argue would be the humane method.
Honestly, Libertarians make MAGA look like a kid-friendly version of Mickey Mouse on a Saturday-morning cartoon show by comparison.
Like MAGA, they all start out talking about less government and more freedoms, but it does not end there.
The last thing you want is those people gaining a foothold anywhere -- ever.
The so-called "libertarians" around here are more conservative than the current MAGA Republicans. In fact, they're so extreme and scary, they almost make MAGA look like a kid-friendly version of Mickey Mouse on a Saturday-morning cartoon show by comparison. I think some of these people would even give Adolf Hitler a run for his money — they're that extreme.
My fear was that their little independent party would gain even more momentum. At that point, it truly will be every man, woman, and child for themselves. And god save us, because no one else will.
Anarcho-Capitalism In Practice https://youtu.be/HTN64g9lA2g?si=emL2FcwCYqZ40N9R via @YouTube
The Probability Broach: Robert's rules of order
Sometimes you have to have rules to get things done.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/06/12/tpb-roberts-rules-of-order/
The Probability Broach: Law of unintended consequences
Is interfering with the market like interfering with nature? Well, kind of.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/06/05/tpb-unintended-consequences/
The Probability Broach: Heads in the sand
Why anarcho-capitalism is a have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too fantasy.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/05/29/tpb-heads-in-the-sand/
#Reagan and #Thatcher will be remembered for lighting the match that set fire to the powder trail leading to the barrel of black powder yet to explode, but they did not manufacture that match out of thin air. It was an organisation that produced the *RoadMap* for them both and self-interests did the rest.
“At his first cabinet meeting as president in 1981, Reagan distributed copies of Mandate for Leadership, whose 3,000 pages came out of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group in Washington, DC. This became the ideology of neoliberalism, which advocated a smaller state, industry deregulation, tax cuts, strengthened defence, and roll-back of social engineering. A year later, 60 per cent of the Mandate’s proposals had been adopted by the Reagan administration, and The New York Times called it ‘the manifesto of the Reagan revolution’. His initiative engaged Thatcher, and spread globally to dominate public policy in democracies around the world.”
The same **Heritage Foundation** is behind #tRump ‘s two terms as #POTUS. If you didn’t know before, it’s all about #NeoLiberalism a combination of #Libertarianism and #Neo-Classical #EconomicTheory sure to please the #Rich and #Entitled in any society.
Long Read:
https://aeon.co/essays/why-western-democracy-is-ailing-and-how-to-fix-it
History teaches that the first self-described libertarians were ardent socialists. It is true #libertarianism has diversified to include traditional liberals such as Nozick and capitalists such as Rothbard, but what is striking is that (at least in the US) "libertarianism" is a term almost exclusively associated with the right—Bookchin notwithstanding. That adds to the confusion surrounding anti-authoritarianism and, I believe, is ultimately bad for a movement that opposes tyrannies.
#anarchism
Libertarianism and the Left Agenda. The Process Has Begun.
I have put together an outline of the book's plan, which will gradually turn into its table of contents, and I have also published the foreword. Of course, for now, I'm thinking through all of this with some effort, but I expect to gradually find my rhythm. If any of the readers feel they are not strangers to leftist ideas, please share your thoughts in the comments. The main thing I am interested in right now is: in your view, what does it primarily consist of? I will, of course, try to […]Tidningen Flamman har skrivit om en by där en grupp högerextremister ska ha köpt upp en lång rad fastigheter. Det handlar om orten Undenäs som ligger mellan sjön Unden och sjön Viken i nordöstra Västergötland. Inflyttningen ska enligt Flamman ha börjat med att byskolan köptes upp av ett fastighetsföretag som heter Gjallarhornet fastighetsförvaltning AB.
https://blog.zaramis.se/2026/08/31/en-annan-sorts-alternativby-undenas/The Probability Broach: Who speaks for me?
An actually good plan for democratic government that would never work in an anarchist society.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/05/22/tpb-who-speaks-for-me/
Slavery-entangled philosophy
John #Locke took part in administering the slave-owning colonies. Does that make him, and #liberalism itself, hypocritical?
https://aeon.co/essays/does-lockes-entanglement-with-slavery-undermine-his-philosophy
#Ancaps are the type to say "No iPhone under #communism" but how about "No Pavements Under #libertarianism "? In Ancapistan The Roads Have No Pavements
This concession overstates the #libertarian argument. Even on its own terms, taxation isn’t theft. The classical #liberal justification of property rights is that people get the fruits of their labor, but #libertarianism overlooks the fact that land isn’t a product of labor. However, using natural resources and land services are negative fruits of everyone’s labor. Positive law determines who owes these liabilities. Taxation satisfies these liabilities
The Probability Broach: The art of war
An army with no one in charge.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/05/15/tpb-the-art-of-war/
The Probability Broach: Tangled in red tape
In times of crisis, even libertarians want a functional government.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/05/08/tpb-tangled-in-red-tape/
Geoff Russ: Canada's weak classical liberal foundations
https://www.withoutdiminishment.com/p/geoff-russ-canadas-weak-classically-liberal-foundations
#CanPol #cdnpoli
#liberalism #libertarianism
#WithoutDiminishment
The Probability Broach: Fire in a crowded theater
This world only works if every single gun owner is maximally responsible at all times.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/05/01/tpb-fire-in-a-crowded-theater/
When a citizen points to their country's constitution as evidence that their government's actions are unlawful, that apparently renders the citizen a foreign agent. The message should be clear to all those even considering lending the country the benefit of the doubt: "Freedom has no place in Russia!" (https://reason.com/2026/07/22/russia-labels-libertarian-party-a-foreign-agent-effectively-ending-its-political-activity/)
#Russia #freeSpeech #VladimirPutin #authoritarianism #democraticBacksliding #anarchism #liberalism #libertarianism
Mullvad och Daniel Berntsson om stödet till fascister
Daniel Berntsson är en av Mullvads två ägare. Det är han som gett stöd till det rasistiska Örebropartiet. Nu har skrivit en förklaring till varför han...
https://blog.zaramis.se/2026/07/21/mullvad-och-daniel-berntsson-om-stodet-till-fascister/
Mullvad och Daniel Berntsson o...
Daniel Berntsson är en av Mullvads två ägare. Det är han som gett stöd till det rasistiska Örebropartiet. Nu har skrivit en förklaring till varför han gett en stor summa pengar till Örebropartiet på sin blogg samtidigt som Mullvad går ut med ettt uttalande om stödet. Det är säkerligen samordnat.
https://blog.zaramis.se/2026/07/21/mullvad-och-daniel-berntsson-om-stodet-till-fascister/The Probability Broach: The self-rescuing hostage, part 2
L. Neil Smith says that armed people can defend themselves, then writes a story that proves they can't.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/04/24/tpb-the-self-rescuing-hostage-2/
The Probability Broach: Make the desert bloom
How could an anarcho-capitalist world agree on allocating scarce resources?
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/04/17/tpb-make-the-desert-bloom/
Okay, I am going to say it: I trust neither #Anarchism nor #Libertarianism as an organizational principle for maintaining a society, and for much the same reason.
Don't get me wrong: It is certainly always appropriate to keep an eye out for government abuse and overreach. But any society needs to keep some sort of institutional memory to avoid the mistakes of the past, and modern civilization is a _massive_ beast with equally massive requirement for that institutional memory.
While some might argue that there will always be enough people who are willing to help out with things that have than obvious benefit for them and their community, I am skeptical. People will demonstrably vote against adequately funding a fire department if this means they would have to pay for it, even though a lack of a fire department will end up far more expensive for the community. And fire departments are a comparably _simple_ matter. Then there is trash disposal, sewage management, and ensuring that the power grid remains stable and doesn't suffer from rolling blackouts (this is the field I currently work in).
And frankly, modern civilization is so massively complex that any single person cannot understand more than a fraction of what is required to keep it running. The wise and humble thing is to acknowledge this, rather than demanding to have a say in each and every line item.
So how do we meet that requirement for institutional memory? Outsource it to the private sector? They will squeeze their customers dry, and then run away once there is a serious problem.
A non-profit? They will focus on the sexiest parts, ignore the rest, and spend most of their resources on fundraising.
A volunteer association? That might work in _some_ cases, in small communities, and for well-respected tasks, but it would be hard to keep the commitment going over the decades. People will always drift away, taking their precious knowledge with them.
No, for all their flaws, I still think government agencies remain the best maintainers of institutional memory we have. Give some experts stable, long-term jobs and allow them to deepen both their expertise and that of their institution as a whole.
Of course, there are _plenty_ of situations where government agencies have gone bad. But to me, the conclusion from that is not:
"Government itself is bad!"
but
"Don't allow governments be captured by bad actors!"
And speaking of which, have you ever wondered why the #Trump administration is so hell-bent on destroying all the institutional knowledge of US government agencies? You should.
#libertarianism #liberalism #facts
"The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government."
Ayn Rand
#libertarianism #liberalism #facts
"When words lose their meaning, people lose their liberty."
Confucius
The Probability Broach: The self-rescuing hostage, part 1
Ordinary civilian plus gun does not equal badass action hero.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/04/10/tpb-the-self-rescuing-hostage-1/
Özgür ve açık kaynak yazılım, komünist değildir çünkü geliştiriciler kodlarını özgür/açık kaynak lisansla yayınlamaya ya da kullanıcılar bu yazılımları kullanmaya zorlanmıyor. Yazılım özgürlüğünün, bireylerin özgürlüğü üzerinde doğrudan etkisi olduğu apaçık açıktır.
https://invidious.tiekoetter.com/watch?v=69ZyX5sN2NA
#liberteryen #libertarian #liberteryenizm #libertarianism #sağliberteryen #rightlibertarian #sağliberteryenizm #rightlibertarianism #siberözgürlükçü #siberliberteryen #cyberlibertarian #siberözgürlükçülük #siberliberteryenizm #cyberlibertarianism #siberözgürlük #cyberliberty #özgüryazılım #libresoftware #açıkkaynak #opensource #özgürveaçıkkaynaklıyazılım #libreandopensourcesoftware #öaky #loss #anticom #anticommunistaction #komümizmkarşıtı #anticommunist #komünizmkarşıtlığı #anticommunism
The Probability Broach: Fly the heavily armed skies
Guns on airplanes. What could possibly go wrong?
https://freethoughtblogs.com/daylight/2026/04/03/tpb-fly-the-heavily-armed-skies/
The comments I made here;
https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/116740511298882540
... about the intuitive appeal of libertarianism to teenagers, applies equally to anarchism.
This is a tricky claim. Because in leftish usage, 'anarchist' tends to mean 'anti-authoritarian socialist'. While 'libertarian' often means 'corporatist apologist'. Clearly these are wildly different things.
Bear with me though, I'm going somewhere with this. Hopefully somewhere useful ; )
(1/?)
I finished her off!
That's it, Libertarian Theory of War is finished and even immediately formatted into epub - download it as a single file and read in comfort. I still have some grievances regarding the cover: Rothbard's portrait resemblance to his spirit in the image leaves much to be desired, and the neural network stubbornly insisted on depicting me in exactly that image, despite the reference I provided. Nevertheless, I generally like the result, so I'll leave it as is. But if anyone decides to try and […]Libertarian Theory of War, section 3.3.4 on war between states has been completed
So, the book on libertarian theory of war has finally touched upon war itself just before the finale. A couple of paradoxical conclusions and several banal ones have been made, and recommendations have been formulated on what libertarians should do in all this mess—in short, I am rather satisfied with the new section. Now all that's left is to smoothly summarize the entire text, and then the book can be assembled into a single epub, illustrated, and presented to the general public in some […]Not only libertarianism
Ancap-chan I've finally gotten around to analyzing the latest powerful longread from my favorite Canadian catgirl named Kulak—about the hypocrisy, inconsistency, and harm of libertarian ideology for a free society. Although Kulak is from Canada, her interests regarding libertarianism are focused entirely on the USA. First, she admits that she used to be a libertarian, spent a vast amount of time studying economic and legal theory, and eventually became disillusioned with this ideology. […]Minnesota and the Libertarian Theory of War
For a long time, I struggled to find the right tone for the final chapter of the book on libertarian theory of war, where a libertarian analysis and recommendations for wars initiated by the state should be provided. However, then a road incident occurred in the US state of Minnesota, which was accompanied by heated discussions online—and things finally started moving. So, I express my gratitude to all security services, civil activists, and lovers of online flame wars for their valuable […]Libertarian Theory of War, chapter 3.2 started.
The book on libertarian theory of war is steadily moving toward completion. Having previously analyzed wars initiated by an individual, I am now describing situations in which a group starts the war. So far, the sections on a group attacking an individual and group on group have been completed. The "group versus state" scenario is on the way. The process of writing the book is bringing me unexpected discoveries. For instance, at the very beginning, I had to deviate from strict methodological […]Libertarian Theory of War, chapter 3.1 completed.
In chapter 3.1 of the book on libertarian theory of war, the sections "Individual vs. Group" and "Individual vs. State" have been completed. The next two chapters will follow a similar pattern, so I hope they will go more smoothly. I've somehow lost interest in the idea of illustrating the book in the style of red-figure Greek vases; I'll put that plan on hold for now and see how it goes.Libertarian Theory of War, Section 3.1.1.
I have started writing the third part of the book on libertarian war theory. So far, not even a full chapter is ready, but only one section, and the style has mutated somewhat compared to the first two parts, so I would like your opinion on how well it harmonizes with the content. Plus, I finally gave in to the current trend and am now illustrating texts with neural networks. This book will be filled with illustrations in the style of red-figure Hellenic vase painting. Gradually, I will add […]Libertarian Theory of War. Chapter 2.5. Summing Up the War.
Writing a new chapter of my book about war happened to coincide by pure chance with another anniversary of the end of the European phase of World War II, as well as with the vibes in the air regarding the conclusion of the current Russian-Ukrainian one. The chapter turned out to be somewhat pensive and lyrical. Also, while creating it, I was occasionally plagued by imposter syndrome: what right do I have to write about such matters without having military experience? May those who do have it […]Libertarian Theory of War, Chapter 2.4. Exiting the War
The new chapter of the book on libertarian theory of war turned out to be short; perhaps I will merge it later with the next one—about summing things up. Or maybe I'll leave it as is. The main idea is simple: one should exit a war as early as possible, but depending on the course of the war, there are some nuances.Libertarian Theory of War, Section 2.3. Waging War
Another section of the book on libertarian theory of war has been completed—specifically, on the conduct of war. Surprisingly, it is once again almost entirely dedicated to the final stages of preparation for war and the actual beginning of combat operations. This is because these are the moments when actions can still be planned in advance. After that, either the plans will work, or everything will go wrong, you will get bogged down in a stupid war of attrition, and the next section—on […]Libertarian Theory of War, Section 2.2. Entering the War
After a very long pause, I am continuing work on the book Libertarian Theory of War (thanks for the inspiration to the Canadian catgirl). The new section Entering the War is dedicated to an overview of the reasons for entering a war and the reasons for not entering one. As usual, spirits frolic on the pages of the book alongside economic analysis. In the next chapter, in theory, the real meat should begin, as the preparations for the main action have dragged on a bit.Translation of Eric Mack’s book «Libertarianism» is finished
The translation of the final chapter has been posted on my website. This chapter addresses a set of objections to libertarianism from well-meaning lovers of that wonderful atmosphere of cooperation and equality that we value so much in small communities united by a common goal. Eric Mack's counterarguments boil down to the fact that attempting to stretch the "owl" of small, ideologically homogeneous communities over the "globe" of a diverse humanity leads to the owl tearing: the very values […]Libertarian Theory of War, Section 2.1. Preparing for War
A substantial piece of text is ready for a book on the theory of war, covering various aspects of war preparation. It took a very long time to write; it is evident that excerpts from different periods differ in style, but I do not want to delay publication; I will still have time to proofread it. Let us consider this as a substitute for the routine post on the anniversary of the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory by Russian troops, and after all, I promised to speed […]Libertarian Theory of War, Section 1.2, Objectives of the Libertarian Theory of War
I have finished writing section 1.2 of my new book on libertarian theory of war, where I outlined the objectives it addresses. Also, before that, I inserted a small paragraph on statism into the previous section. It might have turned out a bit tedious, but it doesn't seem too dragged out. With that, the introductory part of the book is finished, and from here on, things should get more or less concrete. If the previous book about ancap, which we managed to print on paper for the Montellibero […]Libertarian Theory of War, Chapter 1.1.1, Definition of War
The book is still coming along slowly — I'm finding my style, plus there is a lot of other work. The chapter on the definition of war and why I use this specific one is ready. For those who read the book on ancap, my definition has long been no secret, but it was somewhat cumbersome; now a short form has been added: war is a conflict in which people are ready to kill. For now, the relationships between individual subjects are being detailed, but in the next chapter, I will move on to […]Libertarian Theory of War, starting to write a book
I think it's enough throwing unstructured notes at you; it's time to get started on the book itself. The current version of the book will be available on my website at a fixed location at https://ancapchan.info/war/. Currently, there is a rough table of contents available there, which gives an idea of how I envision the structure of the future text. And to get things started, I am immediately posting a short preface. The scale of the task scares me a little. Moreover, I don't want to drag […]Sketches on Libertarian War Theory. Part 2, on why the NAP is a poor criterion.
When I was writing the book on ancap, you could observe the results of the creative search process in real-time. After publication, the material was restructured; as a result of discussions in the comments, personal communication, and simply rereading the text, serious revisions to the wording were introduced, and a couple of chapters were discarded entirely, after which the second part of the book started over in a different vein. And this was while I was navigating relatively familiar […]Erik Mak. Libertarijanizam. Završavam prevod bonus dela knjige.
Aleks Dvoreckij me je ohrabrio novom donacijom, tako da objavljujem prevod poslednjeg poglavlja bonus sekcije knjige Erika Maka o libertarijanizmu. Poglavlje je posvećeno problemu sa kojim se suočavaju svi indirektni konsekvencijalistički pristupi stvaranju društva pogodnog za život. Da bi se ljudi u društvu ograničili na dobrovoljnu interakciju, potrebno je dobrovoljno samoomgraničenje i sveprisutno poštovanje pravila pravednog ponašanja. Ali za svakog konkretnog pojedinca će se […]Eric Mack. Libertarianism. Finishing the translation of the book’s bonus section.
Alex Dvoretsky cheered me up with another donation, so I am releasing the translation of the final chapter of the bonus section of Eric Mack's book on libertarianism. The chapter is devoted to a problem faced by all indirect consequentialist approaches to creating a pleasant society to live in. For people in a society to limit themselves to voluntary interaction, voluntary self-restraint and widespread adherence to the rules of fair behavior are required. But for every specific person, there […]U objavi o debatama Svetova i Šulman pisala si, navodno, da nisi primetila kada se Mihail pretvorio iz libertarijanca u žarkog revolucionara
Pre šest meseci je Mihail nastupao u Latinskoj Americi i govorio da država nema stimula da "vas ostavi na miru i dopusti vam da živite onako kako želite", već da postoje ekonomski i moćni stimuli da to ne uradi. A na kraju predavanja je direktno rekao da je libertarijanizam revolucionarna ideologija. I da ako u duši niste ekstremista-revolucioner, onda niste ni pravi libertarijanac. Kako gledaš na ovu izjavu i predavanje u celini? Anonimno pitanje Sa osećajem blage nostalgije […]Discussion on Panarchy and Libertarianism
A detailed question from Vasily, to which a donation of 0.00008257 btc was kindly attached for urgency. I do not believe that panarchy is libertarianism Yes, a panarchist structure of power will most likely be freer than a centralized one. But the ideas of panarchy resemble a tool for state or social organization more. There is nothing in them about traditional libertarian self-ownership, and nothing is clear even regarding the freedom to exit a jurisdiction. Most academic articles […]