Search
396 results for “bhaskar”
-
My Knowledge Garden book review has been published in Divya Bhaskar's Sunday Magazine - Rasrang.
#bookreviews #gujaratilanguage #writer #bookrecommendations #InformativeReads #gujaratibook #knowledgesharing #mustread #readingclub #booklovers #ArticleWriter #JustKnowledge #gujaratinewspaper #DivyaBhaskar
-
https://tinyurl.com/shreekant-patil/
Government of India Initiative -
#StartupIndia #MAARG #BHASKAR #Mentor #ShreekantPatil #Consultant #Advisor #CharteredEngineer #Valuer #Trainer #ProfessorofPractice
#Ecosystem #MSMEHelp #SME #India Europe #UN #EU #UAE #UK #Nashik #update #श्रीकांतपाटील -
𝑻𝒐𝒑 25 𝑻𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝑳𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓 : 𝑪𝑬 𝑺𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑷𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒍
𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑹𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔
https://www.thinkers360.com/tl/profiles/view/29125
@thinkers360 Thankyou for recognization @Shreekant26
ShreekantPatil #MSMEHelp #Consultant #Advisor #International #Thnkers360 #India #Europe #USA #UAE #Maharashtra #Mentorship #Entrepreneurship #StartupIndia #MSME #SME #TradeCouncil #Exporter #GovtSchemes #Subsidy #DPIIT #Registration #sustainability #Ambassador #UnitedNations #SPSC #Successful #mentor #BHASKAR #Ecosystem -
https://tinyurl.com/shreekant-patil/
Government of India Initiative -
#StartupIndia #MAARG #BHASKAR #Mentor #ShreekantPatil #Consultant #Advisor #CharteredEngineer #Valuer #Trainer #ProfessorofPractice
#Ecosystem #MSMEHelp #SME #India Europe #UN #EU #UAE #UK #Nashik #update #श्रीकांतपाटील -
https://tinyurl.com/shreekant-patil/
Government of India Initiative -
#StartupIndia #MAARG #BHASKAR #Mentor #ShreekantPatil #Consultant #Advisor #CharteredEngineer #Valuer #Trainer #ProfessorofPractice
#Ecosystem #MSMEHelp #SME #India Europe #UN #EU #UAE #UK #Nashik #update #श्रीकांतपाटील -
https://tinyurl.com/shreekant-patil/
Government of India Initiative -
#StartupIndia #MAARG #BHASKAR #Mentor #ShreekantPatil #Consultant #Advisor #CharteredEngineer #Valuer #Trainer #ProfessorofPractice
#Ecosystem #MSMEHelp #SME #India Europe #UN #EU #UAE #UK #Nashik #update #श्रीकांतपाटील -
My Knowledge Garden book review has been published in Divya Bhaskar's Sunday Magazine - Rasrang.
#bookreviews #gujaratilanguage #writer #bookrecommendations #InformativeReads #gujaratibook #knowledgesharing #mustread #readingclub #booklovers #ArticleWriter #JustKnowledge #gujaratinewspaper #DivyaBhaskar
-
My Knowledge Garden book review has been published in Divya Bhaskar's Sunday Magazine - Rasrang.
#bookreviews #gujaratilanguage #writer #bookrecommendations #InformativeReads #gujaratibook #knowledgesharing #mustread #readingclub #booklovers #ArticleWriter #JustKnowledge #gujaratinewspaper #DivyaBhaskar
-
My Knowledge Garden book review has been published in Divya Bhaskar's Sunday Magazine - Rasrang.
#bookreviews #gujaratilanguage #writer #bookrecommendations #InformativeReads #gujaratibook #knowledgesharing #mustread #readingclub #booklovers #ArticleWriter #JustKnowledge #gujaratinewspaper #DivyaBhaskar
-
My Knowledge Garden book review has been published in Divya Bhaskar's Sunday Magazine - Rasrang.
#bookreviews #gujaratilanguage #writer #bookrecommendations #InformativeReads #gujaratibook #knowledgesharing #mustread #readingclub #booklovers #ArticleWriter #JustKnowledge #gujaratinewspaper #DivyaBhaskar
-
𝐂𝐄𝐧𝐠. 𝐒𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐥, 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐀𝐦𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐫 - 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐚, 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐠𝐢𝐮𝐦, 𝐁𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐀𝐑 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐩 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐫
https://wikiforyou.org/wiki/ceng-shreekant-patil/
#wiki #shreekantpatil #brand #Ambassador #belgium #sustainability #UNSDG #FeelInspired #India #Europe #InternationalRelations #Startup #Technology #Consultant #BISIndia #AWS #WeldingExpert #Leadership #PublicSpeaker #ViksitBharat
-
Here is a write-up of our project submission for the #GoogleAIHackathon, task was to build a creative app using their #Gemini LLM. We built an LLM (Gemini) based evaluation framework for RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) systems optimized with example-driven prompts using #DSPy to generate scores from #RAGAS (-style) metrics. Shoutout to Dave Campbell and Mayank Bhaskar my co-contributors to the project for all their hard work! Links to video and GitHub in post -- https://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2024/05/finetuning-ragas-metrics-using-dspy.html
-
#EDUARDO #FREI #MONTALVA headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... C #UDAY #BHASKAR search.brave.com/ask?q=Analyz... 1991 #POT #BLACK aepiot.com/advanced-sea... www.paypal.com/donate?busin... aePiot: The link between now and Web 4.0. Establish your nodes and conquer future SEO.
MultiSearch Tag Explorer -
#EDUARDO #FREI #MONTALVA headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... C #UDAY #BHASKAR search.brave.com/ask?q=Analyz... 1991 #POT #BLACK aepiot.com/advanced-sea... www.paypal.com/donate?busin... aePiot: The link between now and Web 4.0. Establish your nodes and conquer future SEO.
MultiSearch Tag Explorer -
New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics
Strong Hilbert space fragmentation via emergent quantum drums in two dimensionsAnwesha Chattopadhyay, Bhaskar Mukherjee, Krishnendu Sengupta, Arnab Sen
SciPost Phys. 14, 146 (2023)
https://scipost.org/SciPostPhys.14.6.146#IACS
#Ramakrishna_Mission_Vivekanand_University
#UCL #DST
#Horizon_2020 #EC -
Margaret Archer as heterodox post-Bourdeusian
Another piece of evidence to add to Fred Vandenberghe’s thesis that Margaret Archer should be interpreted as a heterodox post-Bourdeusian. In Ghassan Hage’s (very interesting) Pierre Bourdieu’s Political Economy of Being he shares this memory of working with Bourdieu:
In a private chat Bourdieu once said to me something that stayed with me and that I later scribbled on a piece of paper. He said (not word for word): “I suppose it might be useful to start researching a space by thinking of some binary oppositions that one, as a researcher, thinks are crisscrossing it, as long as one then works to show why they are neither as binary nor as oppositional as they first seem, which, mind you, doesn’t mean they are not there.”
This was something Archer was already primed to grapple with, as you can see in my interview with her, through her frustration with the limitations of the empiricist demography she was initially trained in. There’s an immediate resemblance between what Hage reports here and Archer’s analytical dualism, formulated in the late 1980s but whose logic pervades her earlier work, particularly as it was developed through engagement with prevailing theoretical approaches in historical sociology in Social Origins of Educational Systems.
My instinct is to read this as a problem Archer was already unusually sensitive to, which she elaborated upon through engaging with Bourdieu’s work and ultimately critiquing it. But it’s one which Bourdieu himself was also attuned to. The difference being that Archer developed a lose sensibility into a systematic logic and analytical principle, running with it in a way that led her to transcend Bourdieu’s thought. The place for realism came in understanding why the binaries continually reassert themselves and cannot ultimately be dissolved into epistemic perspectivalism.
I feel a bit conflicted about my enthusiasm for the post-Bourdeusian thesis because I know she hated it. But the prevailing tendency is to read Archer as a sociological critic of Giddens and a sociological elaborator of Bhaskar. Whereas I would argue the main body of her thought was fully formed by the time she met Bhaskar, it was a matter of elaborating its philosophical foundations (and then through the reflexivity trilogy onwards filling in the gaps in the critical realist approach through pursuing the threads left in her earlier work). Instead I think she should be read as deeply shaped by the LSE of the 1960s (positively: Popper, Lakatos, Percy Cohen, Gellner + negatively: Glass, Watkins), an ambivalent engagement with systems theory, the Lockwood paper which she subjectively identified as the biggest influence on her work, a love of historical sociology and a deeply conflicted engagement with Bourdieu. These were the initial formative influences, with Bhaskar sitting alongside thinkers like Taylor and Frankfurt in the subsequent more philosophical phase of her work, before I think C.S. Peirce (whose work she loved in a way I don’t think was always completely apparent in the writing) was the last big systematic influence on her thought.
#analyticalDualism #archer #bourdieu #DavidGlass #Gellner #GhassanHage #historicalSociology #Lakatos #lse #Watkins
-
Margaret Archer as heterodox post-Bourdeusian
Another piece of evidence to add to Fred Vandenberghe’s thesis that Margaret Archer should be interpreted as a heterodox post-Bourdeusian. In Ghassan Hage’s (very interesting) Pierre Bourdieu’s Political Economy of Being he shares this memory of working with Bourdieu:
In a private chat Bourdieu once said to me something that stayed with me and that I later scribbled on a piece of paper. He said (not word for word): “I suppose it might be useful to start researching a space by thinking of some binary oppositions that one, as a researcher, thinks are crisscrossing it, as long as one then works to show why they are neither as binary nor as oppositional as they first seem, which, mind you, doesn’t mean they are not there.”
This was something Archer was already primed to grapple with, as you can see in my interview with her, through her frustration with the limitations of the empiricist demography she was initially trained in. There’s an immediate resemblance between what Hage reports here and Archer’s analytical dualism, formulated in the late 1980s but whose logic pervades her earlier work, particularly as it was developed through engagement with prevailing theoretical approaches in historical sociology in Social Origins of Educational Systems.
My instinct is to read this as a problem Archer was already unusually sensitive to, which she elaborated upon through engaging with Bourdieu’s work and ultimately critiquing it. But it’s one which Bourdieu himself was also attuned to. The difference being that Archer developed a lose sensibility into a systematic logic and analytical principle, running with it in a way that led her to transcend Bourdieu’s thought. The place for realism came in understanding why the binaries continually reassert themselves and cannot ultimately be dissolved into epistemic perspectivalism.
I feel a bit conflicted about my enthusiasm for the post-Bourdeusian thesis because I know she hated it. But the prevailing tendency is to read Archer as a sociological critic of Giddens and a sociological elaborator of Bhaskar. Whereas I would argue the main body of her thought was fully formed by the time she met Bhaskar, it was a matter of elaborating its philosophical foundations (and then through the reflexivity trilogy onwards filling in the gaps in the critical realist approach through pursuing the threads left in her earlier work). Instead I think she should be read as deeply shaped by the LSE of the 1960s (positively: Popper, Lakatos, Percy Cohen, Gellner + negatively: Glass, Watkins), an ambivalent engagement with systems theory, the Lockwood paper which she subjectively identified as the biggest influence on her work, a love of historical sociology and a deeply conflicted engagement with Bourdieu. These were the initial formative influences, with Bhaskar sitting alongside thinkers like Taylor and Frankfurt in the subsequent more philosophical phase of her work, before I think C.S. Peirce (whose work she loved in a way I don’t think was always completely apparent in the writing) was the last big systematic influence on her thought.
#analyticalDualism #archer #bourdieu #DavidGlass #Gellner #GhassanHage #historicalSociology #Lakatos #lse #Watkins
-
Margaret Archer as heterodox post-Bourdeusian
Another piece of evidence to add to Fred Vandenberghe’s thesis that Margaret Archer should be interpreted as a heterodox post-Bourdeusian. In Ghassan Hage’s (very interesting) Pierre Bourdieu’s Political Economy of Being he shares this memory of working with Bourdieu:
In a private chat Bourdieu once said to me something that stayed with me and that I later scribbled on a piece of paper. He said (not word for word): “I suppose it might be useful to start researching a space by thinking of some binary oppositions that one, as a researcher, thinks are crisscrossing it, as long as one then works to show why they are neither as binary nor as oppositional as they first seem, which, mind you, doesn’t mean they are not there.”
This was something Archer was already primed to grapple with, as you can see in my interview with her, through her frustration with the limitations of the empiricist demography she was initially trained in. There’s an immediate resemblance between what Hage reports here and Archer’s analytical dualism, formulated in the late 1980s but whose logic pervades her earlier work, particularly as it was developed through engagement with prevailing theoretical approaches in historical sociology in Social Origins of Educational Systems.
My instinct is to read this as a problem Archer was already unusually sensitive to, which she elaborated upon through engaging with Bourdieu’s work and ultimately critiquing it. But it’s one which Bourdieu himself was also attuned to. The difference being that Archer developed a lose sensibility into a systematic logic and analytical principle, running with it in a way that led her to transcend Bourdieu’s thought. The place for realism came in understanding why the binaries continually reassert themselves and cannot ultimately be dissolved into epistemic perspectivalism.
I feel a bit conflicted about my enthusiasm for the post-Bourdeusian thesis because I know she hated it. But the prevailing tendency is to read Archer as a sociological critic of Giddens and a sociological elaborator of Bhaskar. Whereas I would argue the main body of her thought was fully formed by the time she met Bhaskar, it was a matter of elaborating its philosophical foundations (and then through the reflexivity trilogy onwards filling in the gaps in the critical realist approach through pursuing the threads left in her earlier work). Instead I think she should be read as deeply shaped by the LSE of the 1960s (positively: Popper, Lakatos, Percy Cohen, Gellner + negatively: Glass, Watkins), an ambivalent engagement with systems theory, the Lockwood paper which she subjectively identified as the biggest influence on her work, a love of historical sociology and a deeply conflicted engagement with Bourdieu. These were the initial formative influences, with Bhaskar sitting alongside thinkers like Taylor and Frankfurt in the subsequent more philosophical phase of her work, before I think C.S. Peirce (whose work she loved in a way I don’t think was always completely apparent in the writing) was the last big systematic influence on her thought.
#analyticalDualism #archer #bourdieu #DavidGlass #Gellner #GhassanHage #historicalSociology #Lakatos #lse #Watkins
-
Margaret Archer as heterodox post-Bourdeusian
Another piece of evidence to add to Fred Vandenberghe’s thesis that Margaret Archer should be interpreted as a heterodox post-Bourdeusian. In Ghassan Hage’s (very interesting) Pierre Bourdieu’s Political Economy of Being he shares this memory of working with Bourdieu:
In a private chat Bourdieu once said to me something that stayed with me and that I later scribbled on a piece of paper. He said (not word for word): “I suppose it might be useful to start researching a space by thinking of some binary oppositions that one, as a researcher, thinks are crisscrossing it, as long as one then works to show why they are neither as binary nor as oppositional as they first seem, which, mind you, doesn’t mean they are not there.”
This was something Archer was already primed to grapple with, as you can see in my interview with her, through her frustration with the limitations of the empiricist demography she was initially trained in. There’s an immediate resemblance between what Hage reports here and Archer’s analytical dualism, formulated in the late 1980s but whose logic pervades her earlier work, particularly as it was developed through engagement with prevailing theoretical approaches in historical sociology in Social Origins of Educational Systems.
My instinct is to read this as a problem Archer was already unusually sensitive to, which she elaborated upon through engaging with Bourdieu’s work and ultimately critiquing it. But it’s one which Bourdieu himself was also attuned to. The difference being that Archer developed a lose sensibility into a systematic logic and analytical principle, running with it in a way that led her to transcend Bourdieu’s thought. The place for realism came in understanding why the binaries continually reassert themselves and cannot ultimately be dissolved into epistemic perspectivalism.
I feel a bit conflicted about my enthusiasm for the post-Bourdeusian thesis because I know she hated it. But the prevailing tendency is to read Archer as a sociological critic of Giddens and a sociological elaborator of Bhaskar. Whereas I would argue the main body of her thought was fully formed by the time she met Bhaskar, it was a matter of elaborating its philosophical foundations (and then through the reflexivity trilogy onwards filling in the gaps in the critical realist approach through pursuing the threads left in her earlier work). Instead I think she should be read as deeply shaped by the LSE of the 1960s (positively: Popper, Lakatos, Percy Cohen, Gellner + negatively: Glass, Watkins), an ambivalent engagement with systems theory, the Lockwood paper which she subjectively identified as the biggest influence on her work, a love of historical sociology and a deeply conflicted engagement with Bourdieu. These were the initial formative influences, with Bhaskar sitting alongside thinkers like Taylor and Frankfurt in the subsequent more philosophical phase of her work, before I think C.S. Peirce (whose work she loved in a way I don’t think was always completely apparent in the writing) was the last big systematic influence on her thought.
#analyticalDualism #archer #bourdieu #DavidGlass #Gellner #GhassanHage #historicalSociology #Lakatos #lse #Watkins
-
The American dream is dead for many. Social democracy can bring it back | Bhaskar Sunkara https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/social-democracy-america #Socialmobility #USpolitics #USeconomy #Society #Poverty #USnews
-
🌊 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄(𝘀)! 🌊
This week, not 1, but 2️⃣ #CyberCanon Committee Members review 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙒𝙖𝙫𝙚 by Mustafa Suleyman with Michael Bhaskar.
This book is widely known, but to what extent does it offer meaningful value to cybersecurity professionals? 🤔
This is exactly what Jessica Buerger and Susan Hansche help determine in their insightful reviews 👉 https://tinyurl.com/49x3aetp
🛒 If our efforts assist in your decision to purchase, please use our affiliate link to support the Canon 👉 https://amzn.to/45SrpL9
-
𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒑 𝑬𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎 𝒊𝒏 𝑵𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒌 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒕𝒓𝒂, 𝑬𝒎𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑴𝑺𝑴𝑬𝒔 & 𝑾𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝑬𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒖𝒓𝒔: 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒑 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒂
𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗦𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗸 & 𝗠𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗵𝘁𝗿𝗮
#NationalStartupDay #StartupEcosystem #Nashik #Maharashtra #StartupIndia #BHASKAR #MAARG #ShreekantPatil #Mentor #Consultant #Advisor #GovtofIndia #Initiative #India #Europe #USA #UAE #UnitedNations #SDG #Ambassador #GovtSchemes #MSMEHelp
-
India is on track to achieve its emission targets well before 2030, according to a report by IFC1. The report praises India’s climate actions, such as expanding renewable energy, issuing green bonds, and joining the NGFS network. The implication is that India is a global leader in green finance and low-carbon development. #India #EmissionTargets #IFC
-
𝑻𝒐𝒑 25 𝑻𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝑳𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓 : 𝑪𝑬 𝑺𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑷𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒍
𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑹𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔
https://www.thinkers360.com/tl/profiles/view/29125
@thinkers360 Thankyou for recognization @Shreekant26
ShreekantPatil #MSMEHelp #Consultant #Advisor #International #Thnkers360 #India #Europe #USA #UAE #Maharashtra #Mentorship #Entrepreneurship #StartupIndia #MSME #SME #TradeCouncil #Exporter #GovtSchemes #Subsidy #DPIIT #Registration #sustainability #Ambassador #UnitedNations #SPSC #Successful #mentor #BHASKAR #Ecosystem -
Ein Wind weht durch die asozialen Netzwerke und die nur noch wenig unterscheidbaren sonstigen Medien. Und ausnahmsweise, fast schon sensationellerweise wurde diese Agenda von den drei Parteien SPD, Grüne und Linke gemeinsam und gleichzeitig gesetzt. Wo wären wir jetzt, wenn sie das schon getan hätten, als sie noch eine Mehrheit im Parlament hatten? Vergossene Milch. Gegen das Netzwerk des faschistoiden Oligarchen Musk konnten sie sich einigen. Und kassieren nicht wenig Gegenwind von den Rechten. Und den Dummen. Nicht alle sind beides. Leider.
Antonia Groß/MDR-Altpapier ist beides nicht: “X oder: Das Geschäft mit der Empörung – Drei Parteien verkünden, dass sie die Plattform X nicht weiter nutzen. Nachrichtenmedien berichten mehr über die Empörung, als über die Motivation für diesen Schritt. Genau das ist das Geschäftsmodell des Unternehmens.”
Ebenfalls weder dumm noch rechts, aber empört, ist der alte Knut Mellenthin/Junge Welt, der eine sehr informative Ziwchenbilanz des angeblich längst beendeten Krieges der USA und Israels gegen den Iran – und der wiederum gegen die anderen Anrainer des Persischen Golfs – zieht. Lesen Sie schnell, die Junge Welt wird das in ihrem Paywallarchiv beerdigen: “Eine gewaltige Übermacht – Die USA und Israel haben dem Iran empfindliche Schläge versetzt. Dennoch gibt es Probleme mit dem Nachschub von Raketen und mit Teherans Drohnenangriffen. Eine vorläufige Bilanz des Krieges im Nahen Osten”.
Kommen beim Bundeskanzler etwa dumm und rechts zusammen? Das ist umstritten. Nicht umstritten, jedenfalls unter Demoskop*inn*en ist das: Bernd Müller/telepolis macht es jetzt so eitel wie sein Amtsvorgänger: “Friedrich Merz – der unbeliebteste Kanzler der Welt – Selbst Olaf Scholz war beliebter. Nach einem Jahr im Amt ist Friedrich Merz laut Umfragen der unpopulärste Regierungschef weltweit. Ein Leitartikel.” Die Junge Welt findet es witzig, eine Spiegel-Schlagzeile von Merz so abzuwandeln: »Kein Wähler vor ihm hat so etwas ertragen müssen«. Wer darüber lachen kann, hat es gut.
Alternative?
Jacobin veröffentlicht eine Rede seines US-Gründers Bhaskar Sunkara: “Etwas Sozialismus im Kapitalismus ist nicht genug – Sozialismus darf nicht lediglich bedeuten, den Kapitalismus gerechter zu gestalten. Er muss auf eine Gesellschaft abzielen, in der das Überleben nicht mehr vom Markt abhängt – und in der sich die Demokratie endlich auch auf die Wirtschaft erstreckt.”
Meine Lieblings-Zwischenüberschrift ist diese: “Vielmehr geht es um eine Ausweitung von Freizeit, Sicherheit und Lebenszeit außerhalb der Produktion.” Da finde ich mich wieder 😉
Über Martin Böttger:
Martin Böttger ist seit 2014 Herausgeber des Beueler-Extradienst. Sein Lebenslauf findet sich hier...
Sie können dem Autor auch via Fediverse folgen unter: @martin.boettger -
#Ordinance fear haunts #Queer #activists in case of #favourable verdict in the #Indian #SupremeCourt on #samesexmarriage
#Women #Transgender #LGBTQ #India #MarriageEquality #SameSexMarriage
-
𝐈𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 – 𝐄𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐤'𝐬 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐩 𝐄𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦
𝐀 𝐠𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬, 𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐤!
#ShreekantPatil #StartupEcosystem #Event #Nashik #College #Students #Startup #Workshop #Awareness #SeedFunding #Mentorship #Nashikskill #StartupIndia #MAARG #BHASKAR #Viksitbharat
-
Shreekant Patil | Startup India Mentor | Govt of India Initiative |
CE Shreekant Patil is leading official startup mentor at MAARG, BHASKAR Startup India fosters entrepreneurship and nurtures start-ups with government of India, state govt and various incubation centres.
https://www.startupindia.gov.in/content/sih/en/profile.Mentor.60df08abe4b05b2c8d0cd3da.html
#StartupIndia #ShreekantPatil #Mentor #MAARG #BHASKAR #Startup #Ecosystem #India #Viksitbharat #Atmanirbharbharat
-
𝙉𝙚𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙥 𝙤𝙧 𝙨𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨? 𝙇𝙚𝙩 𝙢𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥 𝙮𝙤𝙪 !
https://shreekantpatilmentor.wordpress.com/gallery/
#ShreekantPatil
#Mentor #StartupIndia #India #MSMEHelp #Consultant #Advisor #Europe #UnitedNations #Ambassador #SDGs #Nashik #ChartedEngineer #Valuer #MAARG #BHASKAR #Activities #Worldwide #International