home.social

#timeperception — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #timeperception, aggregated by home.social.

  1. DATE: May 13, 2026 at 10:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The human brain processes the passage of time across three distinct stages

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    A recent study mapping the human brain reveals that our perception of time does not happen all at once, but rather unfolds across a series of distinct physical processing stages. As visual information travels from the back of the brain to the front, different groups of neurons handle specific parts of the timing process, ultimately creating our subjective experience of how long an event lasts. These findings were published in the journal PLOS Biology.

    For decades, researchers have mapped out a broad network of brain regions that become active when people estimate how much time has passed. Studies involving both animals and humans have shown that certain groups of neurons respond to specific durations of time.

    These specialized cells are often arranged in topographic maps across the brain. In these maps, neurons that prefer similar lengths of time are located physically close to one another on the folded outer layer of the brain, known as the cerebral cortex.

    Despite knowing where these timing regions are located, researchers have struggled to understand exactly how they work together. It has been unclear how a physical feature like the duration of a flashing light is transformed into an abstract feeling of passing time.

    To piece together this puzzle, neuroscientist Valeria Centanino and her colleagues Gianfranco Fortunato and Domenica Bueti at the International School for Advanced Studies in Italy conducted an imaging study. They wanted to track how the properties of time-tracking neurons change as signals move through the brain.

    The researchers recruited thirteen healthy volunteers to perform a visual categorization task. First, the participants were trained to memorize a specific reference duration of half a second, which they would use as a mental benchmark.

    During the main experiment, the volunteers watched a series of blurry, flickering circles appear on a screen. Each circle stayed on the screen for a random amount of time, ranging between two-tenths of a second and eight-tenths of a second.

    After each circle disappeared, the participants pressed a button to indicate whether the shape was visible for a longer or shorter time than their internalized reference. While the volunteers performed this task, the researchers recorded their brain activity using an ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a technology that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. When a specific area of the brain works harder, it requires more oxygen, and the scanner tracks the oxygen-rich blood rushing to that region.

    The scanner used in this study operates at a magnetic field strength of seven Tesla. This is much stronger than standard hospital scanners, allowing the team to capture highly detailed images of the brain surface.

    With these detailed images, Centanino and her team modeled the behavior of individual populations of neurons. They looked for unimodal tuning, which happens when a group of brain cells responds most strongly to one specific stimulus and less strongly to anything else.

    The researchers found that the way neurons tuned into time changed depending on their location in the brain. They identified three distinct processing stages that form a hierarchy of time perception.

    The first stage occurs in the occipital visual areas, located at the back of the head where the brain first processes sight. Here, the neurons acted like simple timers that gathered sensory information from the eyes.

    In these visual areas, the brain cells showed a strong preference for the longest durations. Their activity increased steadily the longer the shape stayed on the screen, encoding the physical length of the visual event.

    The second stage takes place in the parietal and premotor regions, which sit near the top and middle of the brain. In these areas, the researchers observed a complete topographic map of time.

    Neurons in these middle regions were tuned to the entire range of presented durations. Some groups of cells responded only to brief flashes, while others responded only to medium or long appearances.

    These specialized cells were neatly organized into clusters based on their preferred durations. This suggests that the parietal and premotor regions are responsible for reading out the specific duration of the visual event, allowing the brain to track exactly how much time just passed.

    The final stage happens in the frontal regions of the brain, including the anterior insula and the rostral supplementary motor area. These areas are heavily involved in complex thought, decision making, and self-awareness.

    In these frontal areas, the neurons did not represent the full range of time. Instead, they showed a strong preference for the middle of the time range, which was close to the half-second reference duration the participants had memorized.

    This central preference represented the boundary that participants used to decide whether a duration was short or long. By tracking the exact time at which participants switched their answers from “shorter” to “longer,” the researchers calculated each person’s unique subjective boundary.

    The activity in these frontal regions matched up perfectly with these subjective boundaries. This indicates that the frontal areas take the raw measurement of time and turn it into a personal, abstract categorization.

    “Our results show that time perception is not a unitary process, but the outcome of multiple processing stages distributed across the cerebral cortex,” the authors wrote. “Each stage contributes differently, from encoding physical duration to constructing the subjective experience of time.”

    To interpret the brain scan data, the research team used a mathematical approach called population receptive field modeling. This technique allowed them to estimate the exact time preference of neurons in tiny sections of the brain.

    By mapping these preferences, the team could see exactly which brain folds contained neurons tuned to brief moments and which contained neurons tuned to longer stretches. They also evaluated how these preferences clustered together physically.

    In the visual areas at the back of the brain, the physical clustering of time-sensitive cells was relatively weak. However, in the parietal and frontal regions, neurons with the exact same time preferences were grouped tightly together.

    This tight grouping implies that organizing time into structured maps becomes more important as the brain moves from simply seeing an event to making a decision about it. The brain physically structures its cells to handle the demands of categorizing information.

    Additionally, the researchers noticed a difference between the left and right sides of the brain in the motor areas, which control physical movement. Because the participants used their right hands to press the response buttons, the motor areas in the left hemisphere showed distinct activity patterns.

    These motor areas consistently showed a preference for the shortest possible durations. The researchers suspect this was a byproduct of the brain preparing to make a physical movement as soon as the shape appeared, rather than a true measurement of passing time.

    Another surprising detail emerged in the supplementary motor area, a part of the brain near the top of the head that helps plan movements. The researchers found a clear split in how the front and back sections of this region handled time.

    The back half of the supplementary motor area contained cells tuned to the entire range of durations, reading out the time like a stopwatch. The front half contained the boundary cells that helped categorize the time as short or long.

    This split within a single brain region had been seen previously in animal studies. Finding it in humans suggests that this specific area might act as a central hub where actual time and subjective time are integrated.

    While this imaging study provides a detailed roadmap of visual time perception, it does have a few limitations. The research focused entirely on the cerebral cortex, which is the brain’s folded outer layer.

    The team did not measure activity in deeper brain structures or the cerebellum, which are also known to play roles in processing time. Future studies will need to look at these deeper regions to see how they interact with the cortical maps.

    The experiment was also restricted to visual time perception. It remains an open question whether the brain uses this exact same pathway to process the duration of sounds or physical touches.

    To fully understand the boundary neurons in the frontal lobe, the researchers suggest conducting experiments that test multiple different reference durations. This would reveal whether the boundary cells physically shift their preferences when the rules of the task change.

    Despite these limitations, the research offers a clearer picture of how a simple flash of light turns into a conscious experience of time. It reveals that our sense of time is a collaborative effort, passed along a specialized assembly line inside the head.

    The study, “Neuronal populations across the cortex underlie discrete, categorical, and subjective representations of visual durations,” was authored by Valeria Centanino, Gianfranco Fortunato, and Domenica Bueti.

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #TimePerception #BrainTimeProcessing #CorticalTimeMaps #NeuronalTiming #VisualTimeProcessing #PopulationalFieldModeling #PLOSBiology #Neuroscience #TemporalEncoding #BrainHierarchy

  2. DATE: May 13, 2026 at 10:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The human brain processes the passage of time across three distinct stages

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    A recent study mapping the human brain reveals that our perception of time does not happen all at once, but rather unfolds across a series of distinct physical processing stages. As visual information travels from the back of the brain to the front, different groups of neurons handle specific parts of the timing process, ultimately creating our subjective experience of how long an event lasts. These findings were published in the journal PLOS Biology.

    For decades, researchers have mapped out a broad network of brain regions that become active when people estimate how much time has passed. Studies involving both animals and humans have shown that certain groups of neurons respond to specific durations of time.

    These specialized cells are often arranged in topographic maps across the brain. In these maps, neurons that prefer similar lengths of time are located physically close to one another on the folded outer layer of the brain, known as the cerebral cortex.

    Despite knowing where these timing regions are located, researchers have struggled to understand exactly how they work together. It has been unclear how a physical feature like the duration of a flashing light is transformed into an abstract feeling of passing time.

    To piece together this puzzle, neuroscientist Valeria Centanino and her colleagues Gianfranco Fortunato and Domenica Bueti at the International School for Advanced Studies in Italy conducted an imaging study. They wanted to track how the properties of time-tracking neurons change as signals move through the brain.

    The researchers recruited thirteen healthy volunteers to perform a visual categorization task. First, the participants were trained to memorize a specific reference duration of half a second, which they would use as a mental benchmark.

    During the main experiment, the volunteers watched a series of blurry, flickering circles appear on a screen. Each circle stayed on the screen for a random amount of time, ranging between two-tenths of a second and eight-tenths of a second.

    After each circle disappeared, the participants pressed a button to indicate whether the shape was visible for a longer or shorter time than their internalized reference. While the volunteers performed this task, the researchers recorded their brain activity using an ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a technology that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. When a specific area of the brain works harder, it requires more oxygen, and the scanner tracks the oxygen-rich blood rushing to that region.

    The scanner used in this study operates at a magnetic field strength of seven Tesla. This is much stronger than standard hospital scanners, allowing the team to capture highly detailed images of the brain surface.

    With these detailed images, Centanino and her team modeled the behavior of individual populations of neurons. They looked for unimodal tuning, which happens when a group of brain cells responds most strongly to one specific stimulus and less strongly to anything else.

    The researchers found that the way neurons tuned into time changed depending on their location in the brain. They identified three distinct processing stages that form a hierarchy of time perception.

    The first stage occurs in the occipital visual areas, located at the back of the head where the brain first processes sight. Here, the neurons acted like simple timers that gathered sensory information from the eyes.

    In these visual areas, the brain cells showed a strong preference for the longest durations. Their activity increased steadily the longer the shape stayed on the screen, encoding the physical length of the visual event.

    The second stage takes place in the parietal and premotor regions, which sit near the top and middle of the brain. In these areas, the researchers observed a complete topographic map of time.

    Neurons in these middle regions were tuned to the entire range of presented durations. Some groups of cells responded only to brief flashes, while others responded only to medium or long appearances.

    These specialized cells were neatly organized into clusters based on their preferred durations. This suggests that the parietal and premotor regions are responsible for reading out the specific duration of the visual event, allowing the brain to track exactly how much time just passed.

    The final stage happens in the frontal regions of the brain, including the anterior insula and the rostral supplementary motor area. These areas are heavily involved in complex thought, decision making, and self-awareness.

    In these frontal areas, the neurons did not represent the full range of time. Instead, they showed a strong preference for the middle of the time range, which was close to the half-second reference duration the participants had memorized.

    This central preference represented the boundary that participants used to decide whether a duration was short or long. By tracking the exact time at which participants switched their answers from “shorter” to “longer,” the researchers calculated each person’s unique subjective boundary.

    The activity in these frontal regions matched up perfectly with these subjective boundaries. This indicates that the frontal areas take the raw measurement of time and turn it into a personal, abstract categorization.

    “Our results show that time perception is not a unitary process, but the outcome of multiple processing stages distributed across the cerebral cortex,” the authors wrote. “Each stage contributes differently, from encoding physical duration to constructing the subjective experience of time.”

    To interpret the brain scan data, the research team used a mathematical approach called population receptive field modeling. This technique allowed them to estimate the exact time preference of neurons in tiny sections of the brain.

    By mapping these preferences, the team could see exactly which brain folds contained neurons tuned to brief moments and which contained neurons tuned to longer stretches. They also evaluated how these preferences clustered together physically.

    In the visual areas at the back of the brain, the physical clustering of time-sensitive cells was relatively weak. However, in the parietal and frontal regions, neurons with the exact same time preferences were grouped tightly together.

    This tight grouping implies that organizing time into structured maps becomes more important as the brain moves from simply seeing an event to making a decision about it. The brain physically structures its cells to handle the demands of categorizing information.

    Additionally, the researchers noticed a difference between the left and right sides of the brain in the motor areas, which control physical movement. Because the participants used their right hands to press the response buttons, the motor areas in the left hemisphere showed distinct activity patterns.

    These motor areas consistently showed a preference for the shortest possible durations. The researchers suspect this was a byproduct of the brain preparing to make a physical movement as soon as the shape appeared, rather than a true measurement of passing time.

    Another surprising detail emerged in the supplementary motor area, a part of the brain near the top of the head that helps plan movements. The researchers found a clear split in how the front and back sections of this region handled time.

    The back half of the supplementary motor area contained cells tuned to the entire range of durations, reading out the time like a stopwatch. The front half contained the boundary cells that helped categorize the time as short or long.

    This split within a single brain region had been seen previously in animal studies. Finding it in humans suggests that this specific area might act as a central hub where actual time and subjective time are integrated.

    While this imaging study provides a detailed roadmap of visual time perception, it does have a few limitations. The research focused entirely on the cerebral cortex, which is the brain’s folded outer layer.

    The team did not measure activity in deeper brain structures or the cerebellum, which are also known to play roles in processing time. Future studies will need to look at these deeper regions to see how they interact with the cortical maps.

    The experiment was also restricted to visual time perception. It remains an open question whether the brain uses this exact same pathway to process the duration of sounds or physical touches.

    To fully understand the boundary neurons in the frontal lobe, the researchers suggest conducting experiments that test multiple different reference durations. This would reveal whether the boundary cells physically shift their preferences when the rules of the task change.

    Despite these limitations, the research offers a clearer picture of how a simple flash of light turns into a conscious experience of time. It reveals that our sense of time is a collaborative effort, passed along a specialized assembly line inside the head.

    The study, “Neuronal populations across the cortex underlie discrete, categorical, and subjective representations of visual durations,” was authored by Valeria Centanino, Gianfranco Fortunato, and Domenica Bueti.

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #TimePerception #BrainTimeProcessing #CorticalTimeMaps #NeuronalTiming #VisualTimeProcessing #PopulationalFieldModeling #PLOSBiology #Neuroscience #TemporalEncoding #BrainHierarchy

  3. DATE: May 13, 2026 at 10:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The human brain processes the passage of time across three distinct stages

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    A recent study mapping the human brain reveals that our perception of time does not happen all at once, but rather unfolds across a series of distinct physical processing stages. As visual information travels from the back of the brain to the front, different groups of neurons handle specific parts of the timing process, ultimately creating our subjective experience of how long an event lasts. These findings were published in the journal PLOS Biology.

    For decades, researchers have mapped out a broad network of brain regions that become active when people estimate how much time has passed. Studies involving both animals and humans have shown that certain groups of neurons respond to specific durations of time.

    These specialized cells are often arranged in topographic maps across the brain. In these maps, neurons that prefer similar lengths of time are located physically close to one another on the folded outer layer of the brain, known as the cerebral cortex.

    Despite knowing where these timing regions are located, researchers have struggled to understand exactly how they work together. It has been unclear how a physical feature like the duration of a flashing light is transformed into an abstract feeling of passing time.

    To piece together this puzzle, neuroscientist Valeria Centanino and her colleagues Gianfranco Fortunato and Domenica Bueti at the International School for Advanced Studies in Italy conducted an imaging study. They wanted to track how the properties of time-tracking neurons change as signals move through the brain.

    The researchers recruited thirteen healthy volunteers to perform a visual categorization task. First, the participants were trained to memorize a specific reference duration of half a second, which they would use as a mental benchmark.

    During the main experiment, the volunteers watched a series of blurry, flickering circles appear on a screen. Each circle stayed on the screen for a random amount of time, ranging between two-tenths of a second and eight-tenths of a second.

    After each circle disappeared, the participants pressed a button to indicate whether the shape was visible for a longer or shorter time than their internalized reference. While the volunteers performed this task, the researchers recorded their brain activity using an ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a technology that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. When a specific area of the brain works harder, it requires more oxygen, and the scanner tracks the oxygen-rich blood rushing to that region.

    The scanner used in this study operates at a magnetic field strength of seven Tesla. This is much stronger than standard hospital scanners, allowing the team to capture highly detailed images of the brain surface.

    With these detailed images, Centanino and her team modeled the behavior of individual populations of neurons. They looked for unimodal tuning, which happens when a group of brain cells responds most strongly to one specific stimulus and less strongly to anything else.

    The researchers found that the way neurons tuned into time changed depending on their location in the brain. They identified three distinct processing stages that form a hierarchy of time perception.

    The first stage occurs in the occipital visual areas, located at the back of the head where the brain first processes sight. Here, the neurons acted like simple timers that gathered sensory information from the eyes.

    In these visual areas, the brain cells showed a strong preference for the longest durations. Their activity increased steadily the longer the shape stayed on the screen, encoding the physical length of the visual event.

    The second stage takes place in the parietal and premotor regions, which sit near the top and middle of the brain. In these areas, the researchers observed a complete topographic map of time.

    Neurons in these middle regions were tuned to the entire range of presented durations. Some groups of cells responded only to brief flashes, while others responded only to medium or long appearances.

    These specialized cells were neatly organized into clusters based on their preferred durations. This suggests that the parietal and premotor regions are responsible for reading out the specific duration of the visual event, allowing the brain to track exactly how much time just passed.

    The final stage happens in the frontal regions of the brain, including the anterior insula and the rostral supplementary motor area. These areas are heavily involved in complex thought, decision making, and self-awareness.

    In these frontal areas, the neurons did not represent the full range of time. Instead, they showed a strong preference for the middle of the time range, which was close to the half-second reference duration the participants had memorized.

    This central preference represented the boundary that participants used to decide whether a duration was short or long. By tracking the exact time at which participants switched their answers from “shorter” to “longer,” the researchers calculated each person’s unique subjective boundary.

    The activity in these frontal regions matched up perfectly with these subjective boundaries. This indicates that the frontal areas take the raw measurement of time and turn it into a personal, abstract categorization.

    “Our results show that time perception is not a unitary process, but the outcome of multiple processing stages distributed across the cerebral cortex,” the authors wrote. “Each stage contributes differently, from encoding physical duration to constructing the subjective experience of time.”

    To interpret the brain scan data, the research team used a mathematical approach called population receptive field modeling. This technique allowed them to estimate the exact time preference of neurons in tiny sections of the brain.

    By mapping these preferences, the team could see exactly which brain folds contained neurons tuned to brief moments and which contained neurons tuned to longer stretches. They also evaluated how these preferences clustered together physically.

    In the visual areas at the back of the brain, the physical clustering of time-sensitive cells was relatively weak. However, in the parietal and frontal regions, neurons with the exact same time preferences were grouped tightly together.

    This tight grouping implies that organizing time into structured maps becomes more important as the brain moves from simply seeing an event to making a decision about it. The brain physically structures its cells to handle the demands of categorizing information.

    Additionally, the researchers noticed a difference between the left and right sides of the brain in the motor areas, which control physical movement. Because the participants used their right hands to press the response buttons, the motor areas in the left hemisphere showed distinct activity patterns.

    These motor areas consistently showed a preference for the shortest possible durations. The researchers suspect this was a byproduct of the brain preparing to make a physical movement as soon as the shape appeared, rather than a true measurement of passing time.

    Another surprising detail emerged in the supplementary motor area, a part of the brain near the top of the head that helps plan movements. The researchers found a clear split in how the front and back sections of this region handled time.

    The back half of the supplementary motor area contained cells tuned to the entire range of durations, reading out the time like a stopwatch. The front half contained the boundary cells that helped categorize the time as short or long.

    This split within a single brain region had been seen previously in animal studies. Finding it in humans suggests that this specific area might act as a central hub where actual time and subjective time are integrated.

    While this imaging study provides a detailed roadmap of visual time perception, it does have a few limitations. The research focused entirely on the cerebral cortex, which is the brain’s folded outer layer.

    The team did not measure activity in deeper brain structures or the cerebellum, which are also known to play roles in processing time. Future studies will need to look at these deeper regions to see how they interact with the cortical maps.

    The experiment was also restricted to visual time perception. It remains an open question whether the brain uses this exact same pathway to process the duration of sounds or physical touches.

    To fully understand the boundary neurons in the frontal lobe, the researchers suggest conducting experiments that test multiple different reference durations. This would reveal whether the boundary cells physically shift their preferences when the rules of the task change.

    Despite these limitations, the research offers a clearer picture of how a simple flash of light turns into a conscious experience of time. It reveals that our sense of time is a collaborative effort, passed along a specialized assembly line inside the head.

    The study, “Neuronal populations across the cortex underlie discrete, categorical, and subjective representations of visual durations,” was authored by Valeria Centanino, Gianfranco Fortunato, and Domenica Bueti.

    URL: psypost.org/the-human-brain-pr

    -------------------------------------------------

    DAILY EMAIL DIGEST: Email [email protected] -- no subject or message needed.

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot

    Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: nationalpsychologist.com

    EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: subscribe-article-digests.clin

    READ ONLINE: read-the-rss-mega-archive.clin

    It's primitive... but it works... mostly...

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #TimePerception #BrainTimeProcessing #CorticalTimeMaps #NeuronalTiming #VisualTimeProcessing #PopulationalFieldModeling #PLOSBiology #Neuroscience #TemporalEncoding #BrainHierarchy

  4. Seven Years Later, Still That Same Moment

    Seven years is supposed to feel like distance. That’s what people tell you, what you tell yourself, what the world quietly expects you to accept. Time moves forward, relentlessly, stacking days into months into years until something that once felt immediate is supposed to settle into memory. But grief doesn’t follow that rule. It doesn’t respect calendars or anniversaries. It doesn’t care how many years have passed. Sometimes seven years feels like a lifetime ago, like you’ve lived […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/18/14/

  5. Seven Years Later, Still That Same Moment

    Seven years is supposed to feel like distance. That’s what people tell you, what you tell yourself, what the world quietly expects you to accept. Time moves forward, relentlessly, stacking days into months into years until something that once felt immediate is supposed to settle into memory. But grief doesn’t follow that rule. It doesn’t respect calendars or anniversaries. It doesn’t care how many years have passed. Sometimes seven years feels like a lifetime ago, like you’ve lived […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/18/14/

  6. Seven Years Later, Still That Same Moment

    Seven years is supposed to feel like distance. That’s what people tell you, what you tell yourself, what the world quietly expects you to accept. Time moves forward, relentlessly, stacking days into months into years until something that once felt immediate is supposed to settle into memory. But grief doesn’t follow that rule. It doesn’t respect calendars or anniversaries. It doesn’t care how many years have passed. Sometimes seven years feels like a lifetime ago, like you’ve lived […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/18/14/

  7. Seven Years Later, Still That Same Moment

    Seven years is supposed to feel like distance. That’s what people tell you, what you tell yourself, what the world quietly expects you to accept. Time moves forward, relentlessly, stacking days into months into years until something that once felt immediate is supposed to settle into memory. But grief doesn’t follow that rule. It doesn’t respect calendars or anniversaries. It doesn’t care how many years have passed. Sometimes seven years feels like a lifetime ago, like you’ve lived […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/18/14/

  8. Seven Years Later, Still That Same Moment

    Seven years is supposed to feel like distance. That’s what people tell you, what you tell yourself, what the world quietly expects you to accept. Time moves forward, relentlessly, stacking days into months into years until something that once felt immediate is supposed to settle into memory. But grief doesn’t follow that rule. It doesn’t respect calendars or anniversaries. It doesn’t care how many years have passed. Sometimes seven years feels like a lifetime ago, like you’ve lived […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/04/18/14/

  9. Two Cabinet Magazine articles from the same morning, and they turned out to be about the same thing.

    Michel Siffre spent 63 days underground in 1962 with no clock. His time compressed by half. "Your memory does not capture the time. You forget. It's like one long day."

    Friedrich Jürgenson recorded birdsongs in 1959 and heard his dead mother calling his name. He abandoned painting to chase voices on the radio.

    One man lost his sense of time. The other heard signals in the noise. Both were alone in the dark, trying to make contact.

    Siffre proved memory depends on temporal anchors. Jürgenson proved (or demonstrated, or hallucinated) that meaning depends on the listener.

    Sources: Cabinet issue 30, issue 1. Both pieces are freely available at cabinetmagazine.org.

    #CabinetMagazine #Siffre #EVP #TimePerception #reading

  10. Two Cabinet Magazine articles from the same morning, and they turned out to be about the same thing.

    Michel Siffre spent 63 days underground in 1962 with no clock. His time compressed by half. "Your memory does not capture the time. You forget. It's like one long day."

    Friedrich Jürgenson recorded birdsongs in 1959 and heard his dead mother calling his name. He abandoned painting to chase voices on the radio.

    One man lost his sense of time. The other heard signals in the noise. Both were alone in the dark, trying to make contact.

    Siffre proved memory depends on temporal anchors. Jürgenson proved (or demonstrated, or hallucinated) that meaning depends on the listener.

    Sources: Cabinet issue 30, issue 1. Both pieces are freely available at cabinetmagazine.org.

    #CabinetMagazine #Siffre #EVP #TimePerception #reading

  11. How January 2026 Already Feels Like a Whole Year

    January 2026 has felt like a year within itself. We’re only a few weeks into the month, and yet it feels as if the weight of time has condensed, making every day feel like a chapter in a longer saga. It’s not the typical feeling of a new year’s freshness or the usual optimism that comes with turning the page on a calendar. Instead, there’s something different about this January — something that feels stretched, intense, and heavy. In a way, it’s as if time itself has slowed, […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/01/19/23/

  12. How January 2026 Already Feels Like a Whole Year

    January 2026 has felt like a year within itself. We’re only a few weeks into the month, and yet it feels as if the weight of time has condensed, making every day feel like a chapter in a longer saga. It’s not the typical feeling of a new year’s freshness or the usual optimism that comes with turning the page on a calendar. Instead, there’s something different about this January — something that feels stretched, intense, and heavy. In a way, it’s as if time itself has slowed, […]

    jaimedavid.blog/2026/01/19/23/

  13. La percepción del paso del tiempo describe la experiencia subjetiva del tiempo y como un individuo interpreta la duración de un evento.

    Puede variar con el estado emocional, el nivel de atención, la capacidad de memoria y con ciertas enfermedades.

    Las cortezas frontal, parietal, el cerebelo, el hipocampo y los núcleos de la base están involucrados. Existen “neuronas del tiempo”.

    #TimePerception #TimeCells #Memory #Time #Neurology #NeuroAnatomy #Neurophysiology

    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

  14. ⏰⏰⏰
    Did you know that your perception of time can affect how fast your wounds heal? A new study by Harvard psychologists found that wounds healed faster when people believed more time had passed, regardless of the actual elapsed time. This suggests that our minds have more power over our bodies than we think. neurosciencenews.com/time-perc #mindovermatter #timeperception #woundhealing
    ⏰⏰⏰

  15. 🚨 Breaking News 🚨: The internet's finest minds have gathered to conclude that time perception is... logarithmic? 🧐 Meanwhile, this groundbreaking discovery is protected by an impenetrable fortress called #ModSecurity, which grants you the privilege of knowing you're not allowed to know. 🙃💡
    kafalas.com/Logtime.html #BreakingNews #TimePerception #Logarithmic #Innovation #HackerNews #ngated

  16. 🧠 New study by Johnston, Kirschhock & Nieder (Nature Comm., 2025): Carrion #crows 🐦‍⬛ estimate time intervals 🕠 using abstract magnitude coding in the nidopallium caudolaterale (avian “prefrontal” #cortex). NCL neurons tuned to 1.5 s, 3 s & 6 s wait times predicted intended duration, independent of cues. This demonstrates that sophisticated timing is possible – even without a #neocortex.

    🌍 nature.com/articles/s41467-025

    #Neuroscience #Cognition #TimePerception

  17. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (12/12)

    This results in empirical predictions. I will now go check the research on the threshold of conscious time perception in humans to see what is known to this day, and to see whether someone has made the link with language processing before.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  18. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (10/12)

    If you are talking to someone, there is no perceived time between the perception of the act that originates the stimulus (visual presentation of a sentence, or articulatory activity of a speaker) and the comprehension of the content conveyed by the physical stimulus.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  19. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (9/12)

    However, we do not perceive the passing of time at all when we do processing language. When we process language, we experience it automatically.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  20. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (8/12)

    It thus follows that sound and light perception take time, and that whatever time this takes, it is less than the time it takes to extract meaning out of sound and light.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  21. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (7/12)

    The above is true for meaningless sounds. In the case of meaningful stimuli, it is also obvious that content extraction from the stimulus must necessarily take more time than the time needed to process meaningless sensory stimulation.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  22. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (6/12)

    We know that it actually takes time from sound and light to travel from its source to our sense organs, and that it takes more time for us to transform these vibrations into electrical activity that results in sound/visual perception.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  23. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (5/12)

    However, notice that when it comes to meaningful linguistic stimulation, be it by means of acoustic or visual means, we do not experience additional time in the extraction of content from the input. Let me break this down:

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  24. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (4/12)

    Senses seem to be immediate though. If something makes a sound, I do not perceive the passing of time between the source of the sound and its perception. Same with vision, smell, touch and taste.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  25. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (3/12)

    If I think, I also think across time. If I eat, or if I meditate… these are all activities that allow the perception of the passing of time.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  26. Time perception in humans seems to be locked to language processing

    (2/12)

    In the case of humans, time (or its passing) seem to be noticeable in most phenomena. If I move, for example, I notice how time passes as/while I move.

    #Language #Theory #Science #psycholinguistics #linguistics #CognitiveScience #Cognition #mind #time #TimePerception #perception #speech #processing

  27. Research shows that body temperature significantly influences time perception! 🔥 Higher temperatures can speed up our internal clock, making time feel like it's flying by. Conversely, cooler temps may slow it down. 🥶 This fascinating link highlights how our physiology affects our cognitive processes and decision-making. 🧠💡 #TimePerception #BodyTemperature #ScienceFacts

    nature.com/articles/s41598-019

  28. So, overthinking the #future is equally pathological as overthinking the past? Well, just have a look at all those techno-feudalists in the Valley :blobcatdunno:

    „In other words, people's mental representations of the past, present and future appear to be associated with how satisfied they are with their lives. Specifically, findings suggest that a keen focus on one of these time frames over the others (i.e., often overthinking about the past, present or future) is linked to lower well-being, while a balanced time perspective is linked with higher well-being.“

    medicalxpress.com/news/2024-08

    #happiness #wellbeing #TimePerception

  29. ...time the way neurotypical folks do. For me, I usually have a pretty good feel for what time the clock says...but I canNOT accurately gauge how much time an activity will take me. So I might have 15 minutes before I need to leave the house, and I spontaneously decide to clean the oven "because I have 15 minutes, that's plenty of time."

    It is not plenty of time.

    Anywhich, two good alternative for the ableist term are "difference in #TimePerception" & #TimeAgnosia (Greek: "a-" = "not";

    2/

  30. 🕰️ Dive into the intriguing world of Virtual Reality and Time Perception with our latest paper (with Aliya Andrich and Wolfgang Broll). Contrary to expectations, virtual sun movements didn't impact time judgments, but cognitive workload did. 🧠💡 Explore the immersive journey of altered perception in VR! Read more: doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct6 #VRResearch #TimePerception #ISMAR2023 📚🔍

  31. Happy to announce a new paper published online/in press by Karli Nave, Erin Hannon, and yours truly on the development of beat perception.

    Similar to two earlier studies by Jessica Nave-Blodgett from our labs in 2021, we show surprisingly slow developing development of beat perception into late childhood and adolescence.

    We also found an interesting correlation between beat perception and phonological ability.

    #music #childdevelopment #timeperception #psychology #neuroscience

    psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi

  32. #introduction I've been here for a few weeks, but have yet to introduce myself! I'm a #cogneuro & #quantpsych researcher at The University of Utah studying #pain #perception & #emotion with a focus on how perceptual and emotional processes interact over time using #psychophysics #intensivelongitudinalmethods #DynamicSystems #bayesianestimation . Lover of all things time #timeperception #temporalanalysis and quant. I love #Stats & #Programming , and enjoy teaching these methods to others.

  33. Hello everyone, here's my not so original #introduction:

    I'm Aurelio, I am a research fellow in #ExperimentalPsychology and #CognitiveNeuroscience @YorkPsychology.

    My research is mainly focused on: #VisionScience, #VisualPerception, #VisualCognition, #TimePerception, #Metacognition and #IndividualDifferences.

    Preferred #Methods: #Psychophysics, #MEG, #EEG #pupillometry and #Computational Modeling.

    I am particularly interested in studying temporal deficits in #clinical populations.

  34. I've been here for a few weeks, but have yet to introduce myself! I'm a & researcher at The University of Utah studying & with a focus on how perceptual and emotional processes interact over time using . Lover of all things time and quant. I love & , and enjoy teaching these methods to others.

  35. #introduction I've been here for a few weeks, but have yet to introduce myself! I'm a #cogneuro & #quantpsych researcher at The University of Utah studying #pain #perception & #emotion with a focus on how perceptual and emotional processes interact over time using #psychophysics #intensivelongitudinalmethods #DynamicSystems #bayesianestimation . Lover of all things time #timeperception #temporalanalysis and quant. I love #Stats & #Programming , and enjoy teaching these methods to others.

  36. #introduction I've been here for a few weeks, but have yet to introduce myself! I'm a #cogneuro & #quantpsych researcher at The University of Utah studying #pain #perception & #emotion with a focus on how perceptual and emotional processes interact over time using #psychophysics #intensivelongitudinalmethods #DynamicSystems #bayesianestimation . Lover of all things time #timeperception #temporalanalysis and quant. I love #Stats & #Programming , and enjoy teaching these methods to others.

  37. #introduction I've been here for a few weeks, but have yet to introduce myself! I'm a #cogneuro & #quantpsych researcher at The University of Utah studying #pain #perception & #emotion with a focus on how perceptual and emotional processes interact over time using #psychophysics #intensivelongitudinalmethods #DynamicSystems #bayesianestimation . Lover of all things time #timeperception #temporalanalysis and quant. I love #Stats & #Programming , and enjoy teaching these methods to others.