Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #researchculture, aggregated by home.social.
We evaluate researchers through papers, citations, grants and h-index. But much of good science depends on something these metrics barely capture: the quality of relationships between people – trust, mentoring, generosity, and the freedom to disagree.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05793-w
Not everything that matters in science should become another KPI.
#ResearchAssessment #Scientometrics #ResearchCulture #ResponsibleResearch
🚨 Update on the #research bunker #birds: there are not one, but TWO cardinals running my schedule. I've named them "Le Boss" (the strutting brown female with red crown 👑) and "Big Pop" (the aggressive red male 🔴). 🐦🐦
They executed a classic pincer grip movement on me! Big Pop was squawking, calling me out from one side of the tree, and just as I got out to respond, suddenly Le Boss popped up, squawking in unison from the other side of the tree!! 🌿🦅
More to come... 🍿👀
Helmholtz Open Science Forum on Collaborative Research Cultures
The event provides a space for reflection and dialogue on how research assessment practices, working conditions, and everyday academic realities shape our research cultures. Join us!
📆 September 24, 2026, 09:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
🔗 https://os.helmholtz.de/en/events/fora/forum-on-collaborative-research-cultures/
➡️ Registration: https://gfz-de.zoom-x.de/meeting/register/noTGW1RTSwSNrww9rQUZZA
Target audience: members of Helmholtz Centers and institutions within the Helmholtz Association only
#openscience #researchculture
Scientific collaboration is not only about methods and results.
It also relies on everyday interactions between people with different languages and academic cultures — a challenge faced by many European research networks.
Did you check out our ReproducibiliTea 2026 conference program yet? 👀
We have three great sessions packed with keynotes, journal clubs, and opportunities to connect and discuss reproducibility.
Here are some highlights from the program shared below.
Whether you’re interested in open science, research methods, or statistics, there’s plenty to look forward to!
Check out the full program and don’t miss your favorite sessions.
Here is the link again for sign-up:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeTapy9uKrV2LN3DutCQpTUWwpepS3-jm6V1xHWVwXo7QmE5A/viewform
#ReproducibiliTea #Reproducibility2026 #Reproducibility #OpenScience #ResearchCulture #StatsTea
Report and toolkit on addressing public harassment in relation to LGBTQ+ research engagement and impact
#research #engagement #researchimpact #researchculture #harassment #homophobia #transphobia #lgbtq
https://www.cssd.ac.uk/Research/Impact/all-publicity-good-publicity
RE: https://social.cwts.nl/@leidenmadtrics/116878720990941949
Great post! “sidestepping the question of how research culture shapes the knowledge that is produced”. The politics of uncertainty, indeed. Helpful. #ResearchCulture
Can playing jazz make you a better physicist?
Theoretical physicist Stephon Alexander argues that musical improvisation sharpens intuition, flexibility and creative problem-solving.
A reminder that science and art often grow from the same curiosity.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01393-z
#Physics #Creativity #Jazz #ScienceCommunication #ResearchCulture
Wie offen ist Forschung an der Goethe-Universität? Ihre Erfahrungen zählen.
Mit unserer Open Research Survey möchten wir besser verstehen, welche Open-Research-Praktiken genutzt werden und wo weiterer Bedarf besteht.
📝 Die Umfrage dauert etwa 10 Minuten, umfasst 17 Fragen und ist vollständig anonym.
Hier gehts zur Umfrage: https://surveys.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/index.php/395336?lang=de
Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung. Bitte gerne teilen.
#OpenScience #OpenResearch #ResearchCulture #HigherEducation #ubfrankfurt #forschung
Good science depends on good mentoring.
A survey of researchers across 65 countries highlights how supervisors can strongly influence mental health, career satisfaction and decisions to stay in research.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01693-4
#AcademicResearch #PhDLife #ResearchCulture #Mentorship #sciencecareers
What does academia look like through fiction?
Nature recommends 9 novels featuring PhD students, researchers and scientific workplaces.
Fiction can sometimes reveal aspects of research that papers never show.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01730-2
#ScienceBooks #AcademicLife #ResearchCulture #SciComm #SummerReading
AI may accelerate some research tasks by an order of magnitude, but science is more than productivity.
Mentoring students, developing expertise and passing on scientific culture remain central to the research enterprise.
🔗 https://physics.aps.org/articles/v19/74
#AI #ScienceEducation #ResearchCulture #Physics #academiclife
What happens when AI helps write science?
A Nature commentary suggests one overlooked consequence: uncertainty may become less visible in scientific papers, even though it is central to how knowledge advances.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01605-6
#ArtificialIntelligence #Science #SciComm #ResearchCulture #AcademicResearch
What makes a great PhD supervisor?
A Nature feature highlights small but lasting actions: giving confidence, protecting students’ time, encouraging independence and showing empathy.
Research culture is shaped one interaction at a time.
Many scientists spend years optimizing experiments, papers and grants… while quietly running another long-term experiment: life itself.
A thoughtful reflection on mid-career research, leadership and balancing family with academia.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00195-7
#AcademicLife #ResearchCulture #MidCareer #ScienceCareers #HigherEducation
We recently added two new reading lists! 📚
• Post-Publication Reviewing and Post-Publication Culture
• Error and Error Correction
We would especially like to thank our contributor, Paulina Manduch, for the valuable support and effort in putting these lists together.
You can find the lists via the link below:
https://rpt-rl.netlify.app/
If you find these resources useful, feel free to like, repost, and share them with your network to help spread discussions around open science and reproducibility 💬
The more things change, the more they need to stay the same: The challenges and opportunities of monitoring research cultures and environments
With the world in its current state, there is a wide interest in both how we preserve what is good in research systems and make necessary improvements. Ensuring sustainability and quality of support in the organisations and communities that make up the research landscape is crucial. But there are also deep problems in our communities and organisations, including structural issues that lead to poor practice and fraud, deep and ongoing inequities and exclusions, and failures in the mentoring and support systems that are needed by the next generations of researchers.
It was against this background that we started a workstream to look at indicators of research culture and environment within the RoRI AGORRA project, culminating in a new Working Paper being published today. AGORRA (standing for A Global Observatory of Responsible Research Assessment) is a project focused on understanding and cataloguing national evaluation systems in different parts of the world. By working closely with the funder representatives on the AGORRA team, we were able to ground our research in a diverse set of national contexts, which shaped the ultimate focus of the paper.
At the beginning I was keen to ensure we try to take a wide perspective on what was meant by “research culture” and “research environment”. One that was inclusive of the differing contexts represented in AGORRA and RoRI more generally. These terms were being used in the UK as part of the REF (which has included aspects of “research environment” previously) with a pilot on “People, Culture and Environment” running in parallel with our workstream. I was also keen to get a perspective on where (and whether) the terms were being used in other settings.
Culture and environment are used to focus on different issues in different contexts
What was clear was that — within contexts of research evaluation or monitoring — the terms “research culture” and “research environment” were used to focus attention on different (but often overlapping) issues in different contexts. The demographic diversity of research staff was a common, but not universal, issue. In some contexts, research practice and integrity were the most significant issues linked with “culture”, but in others these were one of many. “Environment” could refer to the qualities of career structures, the availability of financial or digital resources, or the safety of buildings, alongside the presence of policy instruments.
We don’t always mean the same things by “environment” and “culture”. They are used in different ways in different contexts and often without a clear definition. Environment tends to refer to structures and organisations, and culture to communities and people, but there were variations. This makes sense; one person’s culture (say that of a senior researcher in a specific organisation) might be experienced by another as part of the environment in which they have little say (e.g. a junior researcher, or a community stakeholder like an interested patient).
What we want to preserve and what we want to change are often in common but not universal
There were many “areas of concern” that were common across contexts, but none were a universal priority. Research practice, demographic diversity and inclusion, resourcing, career structures and opportunities, researcher mobility, wider engagement and open communication were all areas that appeared in multiple contexts.
When it comes to examining these there are many existing indicators that might be applicable in a monitoring or evaluation context for specific areas of concern. Most of these come from two places. The first is existing reporting requirements for organisations, either imposed by government, or as part of programs such as ATHENA Swan focusing on gender diversity and inclusion. The second source is the monitoring of research outputs. Both sources provide a foundation for developing improved indicators.The concentration of these existing and potential indicators in two areas, and the fact that they are relevant to specific areas, leads to a question: is there a way to put indicators in context and define gaps? We need a framework that will help us relate them to one another. For example, there are many existing indicators which might be useful for examining organisations, but very few of these could currently be applied to communities. The data simply isn’t reported that way.
Ostrom’s IAD framework as a tool to understand relationships and gaps
This aspect of communities and organisations plus the presence of many output-based indicators lead us to Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD). IAD is used to understand how characteristics of a setting (made up of organisations, communities and the formal and informal rules they use) come together in specific interactions (called an “action arena”) to generate outcomes which through a process of feedback change the organisations, communities and rules that make up the setting.
The IAD framework reminds us that what matters here is how the feedback from monitoring and evaluation processes is received and leads to change, or leads to stabilisation. While we have many indicators of specific areas of concern, we have few if any that help us to understand whether organisations and communities are ready to process feedback productively. Do they have the capacity to engage with it, and if so, make good use of it?
The project both defined many indicators that might be useful in specific contexts but also, as a result, that no single indicator (or even a “basket” of them) can capture the complexity of research cultures and environments. Whether the policy goal is change or stabilisation, the IAD framework shows we need to consider how any indicators we do implement are received, and be ready to adapt, change or abandon them if they lead to adverse responses.
#agorra #indicators #researchCulture #researchEnvironment #rori
Science isn’t just taught, it’s transmitted.
Mentorship, internships, and small professional interactions can shape careers and influence how research is done.
🔗 https://physicsworld.com/a/why-mentorship-is-vital-for-the-future-of-physics/
#Mentorship #PhysicsCommunity #ScienceEducation #ResearchCulture #STEM
What should fluid mechanics papers focus on today?
This editorial argues for a “physics-first” approach: beyond data and simulations, real progress comes from understanding mechanisms and scaling laws.
🔗 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0329552
#FluidDynamics #Physics #ScientificPublishing #ResearchCulture #OpenScience
Scientists are turning to poetry to make sense of complex ideas and share science beyond data.
From storms to molecules, verse helps bridge logic and emotion, offering new ways to think, explain, and even solve problems.
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01028-3
#sciencecommunication #creativity #poetry #ResearchCulture #STEM
Who owns the time saved by AI?
In our column for University World News 👇
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20260401083223503
#AI #HigherEducation #AcademicWork #GenerativeAI #ResearchCulture #FutureOfWork
An interesting study on humour in scientific talks (531 presentations, 870 jokes):
67% of jokes failed.
Only ~9% got real laughter.
Men joke slightly more, and native English speakers are more likely to succeed.
🙂 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.3000
O yes... Joking in a foreign language is hard, and even in your own, it only works if the audience truly gets it.
#AcademicHumor #ConferenceLife #AcademicLife #ResearchCulture #ScholarlyCommunication
This is a #throw-back post to about a month ago, when 90 #reproducibility enthusiasts from across domains and #academic workprofiles met to discuss what shapes and forms a #researchCulture where working reproducibly becomes the norm.
You can read our blogpost about the event on our website: https://reproducibilitynetwork.nl/2026/02/26/nlrn-symposium-2026-culture-change-as-a-multi-actor-challenge/
Foto: Robert Kroonen
The UK’s Researcher Development Concordat created shared principles for researcher careers and wellbeing, but uneven implementation means many researchers still feel the strain.
🔗 https://elifesciences.org/articles/110126?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic_features
#ResearchCulture
Many research teams struggle — not because of the science, but because of everything surrounding it: coordination, documentation, meetings, deadlines, unclear roles.
These pressures are structural, not personal.
Recognising this is the first step toward healthier, more sustainable academic work.
Innovation doesn’t require burnout. Clear work–life boundaries, supportive mentors, peer networks, and celebrating small wins keep research sustainable—and creativity sharper. The best breakthroughs come from rested minds. How do you protect your energy during intense projects? 🌱
The Science Europe report reminds us that #OpenScience is not automatically fair or inclusive. What looks like democratization of knowledge in Northern Europe or North America may, in low-resource settings, deepen existing inequalities.
:doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379696
That’s why #ScienceEurope urges us to treat open science not as dogma, but as a hypothesis about cultural reform, one that must be tested with the same critical rigour as any other scientific idea.
First big grant lesson: the human element matters. Lead with real-world impact, build relationships before you need them, and leave budget room for serendipity. Technical rigor + emotional intelligence wins. Anyone else rethinking their grant narratives? 🧪✨
#ScienceCommunication #GrantWriting #ResearchCulture #ImpactScience
Can a system that uses trainees as labour be fair?
In Voices, Fátima Sancheznieto unpacks the blurred line between training and exploitation, and what needs to change in how we value scientific work.
Listen now: https://elife-container.pubpub.org/community-voices-episode-7?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic
#ECRChat #ResearchCulture #PhDChat