#lawfirms — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lawfirms, aggregated by home.social.
-
Anutin orders probe into officials over foreign nominee firms & #land encroachment
"residents claim #officials, police & personnel fr oth agencies were involved in or turned blind eye to #illegal activity. PM instructed Narucha, Anti-Money Laundering Office, to scrutinise financial trxns of officials & police in #Phuket & #SuratThani. Any links to foreign #nominee #networks or illicit benefits wld result in legal & disciplinary action.. examining complicity by #lawfirms"🧐
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3255029/anutin-orders-probe-into-officials-over-foreign-nominee-firms-and-land-encroachment -
Anutin orders probe into officials over foreign nominee firms & #land encroachment
"residents claim #officials, police & personnel fr oth agencies were involved in or turned blind eye to #illegal activity. PM instructed Narucha, Anti-Money Laundering Office, to scrutinise financial trxns of officials & police in #Phuket & #SuratThani. Any links to foreign #nominee #networks or illicit benefits wld result in legal & disciplinary action.. examining complicity by #lawfirms"🧐
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3255029/anutin-orders-probe-into-officials-over-foreign-nominee-firms-and-land-encroachment -
Anutin orders probe into officials over foreign nominee firms & #land encroachment
"residents claim #officials, police & personnel fr oth agencies were involved in or turned blind eye to #illegal activity. PM instructed Narucha, Anti-Money Laundering Office, to scrutinise financial trxns of officials & police in #Phuket & #SuratThani. Any links to foreign #nominee #networks or illicit benefits wld result in legal & disciplinary action.. examining complicity by #lawfirms"🧐
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3255029/anutin-orders-probe-into-officials-over-foreign-nominee-firms-and-land-encroachment -
Anutin orders probe into officials over foreign nominee firms & #land encroachment
"residents claim #officials, police & personnel fr oth agencies were involved in or turned blind eye to #illegal activity. PM instructed Narucha, Anti-Money Laundering Office, to scrutinise financial trxns of officials & police in #Phuket & #SuratThani. Any links to foreign #nominee #networks or illicit benefits wld result in legal & disciplinary action.. examining complicity by #lawfirms"🧐
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3255029/anutin-orders-probe-into-officials-over-foreign-nominee-firms-and-land-encroachment -
Anutin orders probe into officials over foreign nominee firms & #land encroachment
"residents claim #officials, police & personnel fr oth agencies were involved in or turned blind eye to #illegal activity. PM instructed Narucha, Anti-Money Laundering Office, to scrutinise financial trxns of officials & police in #Phuket & #SuratThani. Any links to foreign #nominee #networks or illicit benefits wld result in legal & disciplinary action.. examining complicity by #lawfirms"🧐
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3255029/anutin-orders-probe-into-officials-over-foreign-nominee-firms-and-land-encroachment -
Lawyers at Perkins Coie in London work with AI avatars to boost soft skills
Home Daily News Lawyers at Perkins Coie in London work with… Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Lawyers at Perkins…
#London #UnitedKingdom #UK #GB #England #Headlines #News #Europe #EU #ABAJournal #ArtificialIntelligence&Robotics #Britain #Career&Practice #GreatBritain #international #LargeFirm #Law #lawfirms #LegalNews #london #Practicemanagement #PracticeTechnology #Technology
https://www.europesays.com/uk/944119/ -
https://www.europesays.com/uk/944119/ Lawyers at Perkins Coie in London work with AI avatars to boost soft skills #ABAJournal #ArtificialIntelligence&Robotics #Britain #Career&Practice #England #Europe #GreatBritain #international #LargeFirm #Law #LawFirms #LegalNews #london #PracticeManagement #PracticeTechnology #Technology #UK #UnitedKingdom
-
“In contrast, #Mike is #OpenSource #software meaning it is free to download and customise. It also means that using the software carries #security and #liability #risks, potentially deterring #law firms from using the tool.
Worth $15 billion and $8 billion, respectively, #Harvey and #Legora have come to dominate the legal corner of the AI universe, with all of #Australia’s top eight #LawFirms subscribing to one or both.
Mike was built as a direct challenge to their iron grip, according to its founder #WilliamChen, a former #JuniorLawyer at top-ranked US law firm Latham & Watkins, who used existing #AITools to #VibeCode” his new app.”
Cheap to use. No maintenance, support, documentation or verification that it works. Law is by definition cautious and regressive. Some law firm will try it, fail and be pushed out of an Industry where reputation to win comes before price.
#AI / #LegalSoftware <https://archive.md/mXr0t> / (paywall) <https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/meet-mike-the-free-ai-for-lawyers-that-might-blow-up-a-23bn-sector-20260506-p5zudj>
-
“In contrast, #Mike is #OpenSource #software meaning it is free to download and customise. It also means that using the software carries #security and #liability #risks, potentially deterring #law firms from using the tool.
Worth $15 billion and $8 billion, respectively, #Harvey and #Legora have come to dominate the legal corner of the AI universe, with all of #Australia’s top eight #LawFirms subscribing to one or both.
Mike was built as a direct challenge to their iron grip, according to its founder #WilliamChen, a former #JuniorLawyer at top-ranked US law firm Latham & Watkins, who used existing #AITools to #VibeCode” his new app.”
Cheap to use. No maintenance, support, documentation or verification that it works. Law is by definition cautious and regressive. Some law firm will try it, fail and be pushed out of an Industry where reputation to win comes before price.
#AI / #LegalSoftware <https://archive.md/mXr0t> / (paywall) <https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/meet-mike-the-free-ai-for-lawyers-that-might-blow-up-a-23bn-sector-20260506-p5zudj>
-
“In contrast, #Mike is #OpenSource #software meaning it is free to download and customise. It also means that using the software carries #security and #liability #risks, potentially deterring #law firms from using the tool.
Worth $15 billion and $8 billion, respectively, #Harvey and #Legora have come to dominate the legal corner of the AI universe, with all of #Australia’s top eight #LawFirms subscribing to one or both.
Mike was built as a direct challenge to their iron grip, according to its founder #WilliamChen, a former #JuniorLawyer at top-ranked US law firm Latham & Watkins, who used existing #AITools to #VibeCode” his new app.”
Cheap to use. No maintenance, support, documentation or verification that it works. Law is by definition cautious and regressive. Some law firm will try it, fail and be pushed out of an Industry where reputation to win comes before price.
#AI / #LegalSoftware <https://archive.md/mXr0t> / (paywall) <https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/meet-mike-the-free-ai-for-lawyers-that-might-blow-up-a-23bn-sector-20260506-p5zudj>
-
“In contrast, #Mike is #OpenSource #software meaning it is free to download and customise. It also means that using the software carries #security and #liability #risks, potentially deterring #law firms from using the tool.
Worth $15 billion and $8 billion, respectively, #Harvey and #Legora have come to dominate the legal corner of the AI universe, with all of #Australia’s top eight #LawFirms subscribing to one or both.
Mike was built as a direct challenge to their iron grip, according to its founder #WilliamChen, a former #JuniorLawyer at top-ranked US law firm Latham & Watkins, who used existing #AITools to #VibeCode” his new app.”
Cheap to use. No maintenance, support, documentation or verification that it works. Law is by definition cautious and regressive. Some law firm will try it, fail and be pushed out of an Industry where reputation to win comes before price.
#AI / #LegalSoftware <https://archive.md/mXr0t> / (paywall) <https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/meet-mike-the-free-ai-for-lawyers-that-might-blow-up-a-23bn-sector-20260506-p5zudj>
-
“In contrast, #Mike is #OpenSource #software meaning it is free to download and customise. It also means that using the software carries #security and #liability #risks, potentially deterring #law firms from using the tool.
Worth $15 billion and $8 billion, respectively, #Harvey and #Legora have come to dominate the legal corner of the AI universe, with all of #Australia’s top eight #LawFirms subscribing to one or both.
Mike was built as a direct challenge to their iron grip, according to its founder #WilliamChen, a former #JuniorLawyer at top-ranked US law firm Latham & Watkins, who used existing #AITools to #VibeCode” his new app.”
Cheap to use. No maintenance, support, documentation or verification that it works. Law is by definition cautious and regressive. Some law firm will try it, fail and be pushed out of an Industry where reputation to win comes before price.
#AI / #LegalSoftware <https://archive.md/mXr0t> / (paywall) <https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/meet-mike-the-free-ai-for-lawyers-that-might-blow-up-a-23bn-sector-20260506-p5zudj>
-
https://www.europesays.com/africa/218725/ Legal sector transformation at risk as top law firms challenge B-BBEE in landmark court battle #BeeLegalSectorCode #BlackSash #Bowmans #DeneysReitz #GautengHighCourt #GenericCodes #IndustryAndCompetition #LawFirms #lsc #NicoleneJanse #nieuwenhuizen #NortonRoseFulbright #Pretoria #ProbonoOrg #SouthAfrica #TembekaNgcukaitobi #WebberWentzel #werkmans #werksmans #ZeldaVenter@inlCoZa
-
https://www.europesays.com/ie/454973/ AI and Mark Cuban Among Startup’s Tools to Fight Denied Health Care Claims #ArtificialIntelligence #BLOOMBERGBUSINESSWEEK #businessweek #California #ChiefExecutiveOfficer #Drugs #Éire #Health #HealthCare #Healthcare #IE #industries #InformationTechnology #InsuranceIndustry #Ireland #LawFirms #Startups #Technology #USDepartmentOfVeteransAffairs
-
https://www.europesays.com/ie/447266/ This Sequoia partner thinks AI-enabled services are the new software. Here’s why #Accounting #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #ArtificialIntelligence #audit #Consulting #Éire #EyeOnAI #IE #InsuranceIndustry #Ireland #LawFirms #MachineLearning #SequoiaCapital #Services #Technology #VentureCapital
-
Canada Revenue Agency advises law firms of changes to taxpayer information request process
The agency indicated that requests for income statements, notices of assessment, and benefits information must be filed by…
#NewsBeep #News #Canada #CA #CanadaRevenueAgency #lawfirms #taxpayer
https://www.newsbeep.com/ca/604831/ -
Meta pulls Facebook ads recruiting for social media addiction lawsuits
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjw0zgz9zyo
#BBC
#BBCNews
#Technology
#Addiction
#Lawfirms
#Lawsuit
#AvertisingIf these products are NOT addictive, what are they SO WORRIED ABOUT.
-
Meta pulls Facebook ads recruiting for social media addiction lawsuits
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjw0zgz9zyo
#BBC
#BBCNews
#Technology
#Addiction
#Lawfirms
#Lawsuit
#AvertisingIf these products are NOT addictive, what are they SO WORRIED ABOUT.
-
Meta pulls Facebook ads recruiting for social media addiction lawsuits
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjw0zgz9zyo
#BBC
#BBCNews
#Technology
#Addiction
#Lawfirms
#Lawsuit
#AvertisingIf these products are NOT addictive, what are they SO WORRIED ABOUT.
-
Meta pulls Facebook ads recruiting for social media addiction lawsuits
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjw0zgz9zyo
#BBC
#BBCNews
#Technology
#Addiction
#Lawfirms
#Lawsuit
#AvertisingIf these products are NOT addictive, what are they SO WORRIED ABOUT.
-
Meta pulls Facebook ads recruiting for social media addiction lawsuits
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjw0zgz9zyo
#BBC
#BBCNews
#Technology
#Addiction
#Lawfirms
#Lawsuit
#AvertisingIf these products are NOT addictive, what are they SO WORRIED ABOUT.
-
Founder of a $2.5 million AI-powered legal business worked at her DA’s office at just 12 years old https://www.byteseu.com/1919131/ #business #careers #coding #CollegesAndUniversities #Cooley #Entrepreneurs #entrepreneurship #FemaleFounders #founders #HarvardUniversity #Jobs #Kansas #LAW #LawFirms #LawSchool #MarkZuckerberg #movies #SiliconValley #StartUps #YoungAdults
-
For now, 5 #banks are expected to work on the offering — #BankOfAmerica, #Citigroup, #GoldmanSachs, #JPMorganChase & #MorganStanley. The #LawFirms #GibsonDunn & #DavisPolk are also advising on the deal.
Musk’s agreement with banks is a big score for #SpaceX, which merged with #xAI in February & whose #Grok is a distant 4th in the #AI race behind #OpenAI’s #ChatGPT, #Claude & #Google’s #Gemini.
-
For now, 5 #banks are expected to work on the offering — #BankOfAmerica, #Citigroup, #GoldmanSachs, #JPMorganChase & #MorganStanley. The #LawFirms #GibsonDunn & #DavisPolk are also advising on the deal.
Musk’s agreement with banks is a big score for #SpaceX, which merged with #xAI in February & whose #Grok is a distant 4th in the #AI race behind #OpenAI’s #ChatGPT, #Claude & #Google’s #Gemini.
-
For now, 5 #banks are expected to work on the offering — #BankOfAmerica, #Citigroup, #GoldmanSachs, #JPMorganChase & #MorganStanley. The #LawFirms #GibsonDunn & #DavisPolk are also advising on the deal.
Musk’s agreement with banks is a big score for #SpaceX, which merged with #xAI in February & whose #Grok is a distant 4th in the #AI race behind #OpenAI’s #ChatGPT, #Claude & #Google’s #Gemini.
-
For now, 5 #banks are expected to work on the offering — #BankOfAmerica, #Citigroup, #GoldmanSachs, #JPMorganChase & #MorganStanley. The #LawFirms #GibsonDunn & #DavisPolk are also advising on the deal.
Musk’s agreement with banks is a big score for #SpaceX, which merged with #xAI in February & whose #Grok is a distant 4th in the #AI race behind #OpenAI’s #ChatGPT, #Claude & #Google’s #Gemini.
-
For now, 5 #banks are expected to work on the offering — #BankOfAmerica, #Citigroup, #GoldmanSachs, #JPMorganChase & #MorganStanley. The #LawFirms #GibsonDunn & #DavisPolk are also advising on the deal.
Musk’s agreement with banks is a big score for #SpaceX, which merged with #xAI in February & whose #Grok is a distant 4th in the #AI race behind #OpenAI’s #ChatGPT, #Claude & #Google’s #Gemini.
-
It amazes me what a touchpoint is someone's #pic/#bio. I #volunteer for a #NonProfit that produces monthly #sessions about #tech at #LawFirms. Whether #vendors, biz #professionals (formerly "#staff"), attorneys, or NPAs (Non-Practicing Attorneys), people will not give you their #headshot & #biography (#attorneys are better generally).
They make me ask over & over, or they never send, and appear on the #panel without.
Part #ImposterSyndrome? Part de-valuing self/ not worthy of presentation? -
It amazes me what a touchpoint is someone's #pic/#bio. I #volunteer for a #NonProfit that produces monthly #sessions about #tech at #LawFirms. Whether #vendors, biz #professionals (formerly "#staff"), attorneys, or NPAs (Non-Practicing Attorneys), people will not give you their #headshot & #biography (#attorneys are better generally).
They make me ask over & over, or they never send, and appear on the #panel without.
Part imposter syndrome? Part de-valuing self/ not worthy of presentation? -
It amazes me what a touchpoint is someone's #pic/#bio. I #volunteer for a #NonProfit that produces monthly #sessions about #tech at #LawFirms. Whether #vendors, biz #professionals (formerly "#staff"), attorneys, or NPAs (Non-Practicing Attorneys), people will not give you their #headshot & #biography (#attorneys are better generally).
They make me ask over & over, or they never send, and appear on the #panel without.
Part #ImposterSyndrome? Part de-valuing self/ not worthy of presentation? -
It amazes me what a touchpoint is someone's #pic/#bio. I #volunteer for a #NonProfit that produces monthly #sessions about #tech at #LawFirms. Whether #vendors, biz #professionals (formerly "#staff"), attorneys, or NPAs (Non-Practicing Attorneys), people will not give you their #headshot & #biography (#attorneys are better generally).
They make me ask over & over, or they never send, and appear on the #panel without.
Part #ImposterSyndrome? Part de-valuing self/ not worthy of presentation? -
It amazes me what a touchpoint is someone's #pic/#bio. I #volunteer for a #NonProfit that produces monthly #sessions about #tech at #LawFirms. Whether #vendors, biz #professionals (formerly "#staff"), attorneys, or NPAs (Non-Practicing Attorneys), people will not give you their #headshot & #biography (#attorneys are better generally).
They make me ask over & over, or they never send, and appear on the #panel without.
Part #ImposterSyndrome? Part de-valuing self/ not worthy of presentation? -
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
#lawsuit #appeal update from Friday continues with more briefs:
#SusmanGodfrey:
• We are being punished for doing our job as lawyers and Constitutionally associating with fellow scapegoat of the President's woes Dominion.
• This retaliation for ... checks notes ... existing without worshiping #Trump is an example of the "wolf com[ing] as a wolf." The Government admitted this.
• As the retaliation scheme is proven, Section 1 can't be severed *now*. It's not government speech, but rather the motive behind a crafted scheme. Also, there is no severability clause in *our* #ExecutiveOrder
• So little due process that we found out about this when Trump signed it on TV.
• The government pointed out that nine other #lawfirms capitulated, thus proving that the harms are not imaginary or speculative. -
#lawsuit #appeal update from Friday continues with more briefs:
#SusmanGodfrey:
• We are being punished for doing our job as lawyers and Constitutionally associating with fellow scapegoat of the President's woes Dominion.
• This retaliation for ... checks notes ... existing without worshiping #Trump is an example of the "wolf com[ing] as a wolf." The Government admitted this.
• As the retaliation scheme is proven, Section 1 can't be severed *now*. It's not government speech, but rather the motive behind a crafted scheme. Also, there is no severability clause in *our* #ExecutiveOrder
• So little due process that we found out about this when Trump signed it on TV.
• The government pointed out that nine other #lawfirms capitulated, thus proving that the harms are not imaginary or speculative. -
#lawsuit #appeal update from Friday continues with more briefs:
#SusmanGodfrey:
• We are being punished for doing our job as lawyers and Constitutionally associating with fellow scapegoat of the President's woes Dominion.
• This retaliation for ... checks notes ... existing without worshiping #Trump is an example of the "wolf com[ing] as a wolf." The Government admitted this.
• As the retaliation scheme is proven, Section 1 can't be severed *now*. It's not government speech, but rather the motive behind a crafted scheme. Also, there is no severability clause in *our* #ExecutiveOrder
• So little due process that we found out about this when Trump signed it on TV.
• The government pointed out that nine other #lawfirms capitulated, thus proving that the harms are not imaginary or speculative. -
#lawsuit #appeal update from Friday continues with more briefs:
#SusmanGodfrey:
• We are being punished for doing our job as lawyers and Constitutionally associating with fellow scapegoat of the President's woes Dominion.
• This retaliation for ... checks notes ... existing without worshiping #Trump is an example of the "wolf com[ing] as a wolf." The Government admitted this.
• As the retaliation scheme is proven, Section 1 can't be severed *now*. It's not government speech, but rather the motive behind a crafted scheme. Also, there is no severability clause in *our* #ExecutiveOrder
• So little due process that we found out about this when Trump signed it on TV.
• The government pointed out that nine other #lawfirms capitulated, thus proving that the harms are not imaginary or speculative. -
#lawsuit #appeal update from Friday continues with more briefs:
#SusmanGodfrey:
• We are being punished for doing our job as lawyers and Constitutionally associating with fellow scapegoat of the President's woes Dominion.
• This retaliation for ... checks notes ... existing without worshiping #Trump is an example of the "wolf com[ing] as a wolf." The Government admitted this.
• As the retaliation scheme is proven, Section 1 can't be severed *now*. It's not government speech, but rather the motive behind a crafted scheme. Also, there is no severability clause in *our* #ExecutiveOrder
• So little due process that we found out about this when Trump signed it on TV.
• The government pointed out that nine other #lawfirms capitulated, thus proving that the harms are not imaginary or speculative. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
#KathrynRubino points out that the #Trump #DOJ argues that since nine named #BigLaw #LawFirms capitulated, that must mean that these four law firms and the four judges who ruled for them must be wrong.
> But the most revealing part of the filing comes when the DOJ addresses the broader legal industry, and specifically the firms that chose a different, much more shameful, path than the four challengers. The DOJ points to the firms that didn’t sue, the yellow-bellied nine that cut deals with the administration:
> > The President also issued (or considered issuing) EOs addressing risks and practices from other law firms not parties to this appeal. In fact, many law firms agreed to address their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public interest.
— p. 14
> Then helpfully lists the nine firms for those that don’t have their names engraved in the brain:
>> Allen Overy Shearman Sterling; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; Milbank; Paul, Weiss; Simpson Thacher; Skadden; and Wilkie Farr.
— p. 14
> And contrasts that capitulation with the plaintiffs,
> > The four plaintiff law firms instead filed suit.
— p. 14
> The DOJ is arguing that the orders are legitimate, in part, because other firms folded.
-
#KathrynRubino points out that the #Trump #DOJ argues that since nine named #BigLaw #LawFirms capitulated, that must mean that these four law firms and the four judges who ruled for them must be wrong.
> But the most revealing part of the filing comes when the DOJ addresses the broader legal industry, and specifically the firms that chose a different, much more shameful, path than the four challengers. The DOJ points to the firms that didn’t sue, the yellow-bellied nine that cut deals with the administration:
> > The President also issued (or considered issuing) EOs addressing risks and practices from other law firms not parties to this appeal. In fact, many law firms agreed to address their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public interest.
— p. 14
> Then helpfully lists the nine firms for those that don’t have their names engraved in the brain:
>> Allen Overy Shearman Sterling; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; Milbank; Paul, Weiss; Simpson Thacher; Skadden; and Wilkie Farr.
— p. 14
> And contrasts that capitulation with the plaintiffs,
> > The four plaintiff law firms instead filed suit.
— p. 14
> The DOJ is arguing that the orders are legitimate, in part, because other firms folded.
-
#KathrynRubino points out that the #Trump #DOJ argues that since nine named #BigLaw #LawFirms capitulated, that must mean that these four law firms and the four judges who ruled for them must be wrong.
> But the most revealing part of the filing comes when the DOJ addresses the broader legal industry, and specifically the firms that chose a different, much more shameful, path than the four challengers. The DOJ points to the firms that didn’t sue, the yellow-bellied nine that cut deals with the administration:
> > The President also issued (or considered issuing) EOs addressing risks and practices from other law firms not parties to this appeal. In fact, many law firms agreed to address their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public interest.
— p. 14
> Then helpfully lists the nine firms for those that don’t have their names engraved in the brain:
>> Allen Overy Shearman Sterling; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; Milbank; Paul, Weiss; Simpson Thacher; Skadden; and Wilkie Farr.
— p. 14
> And contrasts that capitulation with the plaintiffs,
> > The four plaintiff law firms instead filed suit.
— p. 14
> The DOJ is arguing that the orders are legitimate, in part, because other firms folded.
-
#KathrynRubino points out that the #Trump #DOJ argues that since nine named #BigLaw #LawFirms capitulated, that must mean that these four law firms and the four judges who ruled for them must be wrong.
> But the most revealing part of the filing comes when the DOJ addresses the broader legal industry, and specifically the firms that chose a different, much more shameful, path than the four challengers. The DOJ points to the firms that didn’t sue, the yellow-bellied nine that cut deals with the administration:
> > The President also issued (or considered issuing) EOs addressing risks and practices from other law firms not parties to this appeal. In fact, many law firms agreed to address their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public interest.
— p. 14
> Then helpfully lists the nine firms for those that don’t have their names engraved in the brain:
>> Allen Overy Shearman Sterling; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; Milbank; Paul, Weiss; Simpson Thacher; Skadden; and Wilkie Farr.
— p. 14
> And contrasts that capitulation with the plaintiffs,
> > The four plaintiff law firms instead filed suit.
— p. 14
> The DOJ is arguing that the orders are legitimate, in part, because other firms folded.