#green-oa — Public Fediverse posts

Kudos to #Yale for adopting a #RightsRetention #OpenAccess policy, to take effect July 1, 2026. guides.library.yale.edu/FAS-SEAS-Aut... #Academia #Copyright #GreenOA #ScholComm

Yale University Library Resear...

Kudos to #Yale for adopting a #RightsRetention #OpenAccess policy, to take effect July 1, 2026.
https://guides.library.yale.edu/FAS-SEAS-AuthorRightsPolicy

#Academia #Copyright #GreenOA #ScholComm

April issue of our Scholarly Communications Newsletter is out! #ScholComm
🔸 #OAForward initiative
🔸 CAUL's 100,000th OA article
🔸 National vision for archives in England
🔸 British Academy's report on #greenOA for longform works
🔸 List of #diamondOA initiatives and more
https://mailchi.mp/a26423ef221e/british-library-scholarly-communications-newsletter-april-2026

As numerous posts on this blog have emphasised, the underlying idea of open access (OA) – allowing anyone to read and share published academic research for free – is great in principle, but in practice has failed in important ways. That’s because traditional academic publishers have subverted the open access model to such an extent that the costs for research institutions of publishing in […]

#CancerResearchUK will stop paying #APCs for funded researchers.
https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2026/04/01/why-we-wont-be-funding-open-access-publishing-any-more/

PS. So far, so good. There are strong reasons to move away from APCs. For a summary, see Recommendation 3 of the Budapest Open Access Initiative 20th anniversary statement in 2022. (Disclosure: I was the lead author.)
https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/#rec-3

Unfortunately the Cancer Research UK announcement is marred by several false assertions and assumptions about #OpenAccess.

* Its narrow decision is to stop funding APCs, but its headline is that it will stop funding OA publishing as such. It leaves the distinct false impression that all OA journals charge APCs.

* Deep in the text it says that OA "hasn't worked. At least not in its current form." That looks like a recognition that not all OA depends on APCs. But it isn't explicit and didn't prevent careless language elsewhere in the statement.

* It never acknowledges that no-APC OA (#DiamondOA) journals exist, let alone that they constitute the majority of OA journals.

* It does acknowledge the existence of no-APC OA through repositories, or #GreenOA. But it falsely suggests that green OA must be embargoed. Just to give one notable set of counter-examples, all the federal OA policies in the US require unembargoed green OA.

#ScholComm

Big news from #arXiv:
https://jobs.chronicle.com/job/37961678/chief-executive-officer

1. It's becoming an independent #nonprofit organization.
2. It's leaving #CornellU.
3. It's hiring a CEO, with a salary in the range of $300k.

#GreenOA #OpenAccess #Preprints #ScholComm

Watching with interest. "COAR Notify and the Launch of a Publish, Review, Curate Alliance." coar-repositories.org/news-updates... PS: I'm a big fan of #COAR, #COARNotify, #PRC, #Preprints, and taking full advantage of #OpenAccess #Repositories. #GreenOA #OpenPeerReview #ScholComm

COAR Notify and the Launch of ...

Watching with interest.

"COAR Notify and the Launch of a Publish, Review, Curate Alliance."
https://coar-repositories.org/news-updates/coar-notify-and-the-launch-of-a-publish-review-curate-alliance/

PS: I'm a big fan of #COAR, #COARNotify, #PRC, #Preprints, and taking full advantage of #OpenAccess #Repositories.

#GreenOA #OpenPeerReview #ScholComm

[Science ouverte]
Vous prévoyez de déposer dans HAL ? Il y a du nouveau depuis le 2 fév. : le choix obligatoire d'une licence pour votre fichier 📌
💡 Le CCSD propose des ressources pour y voir clair : https://www.ccsd.cnrs.fr/2026/02/pas-de-depot-hal-sans-licence-les-infos-indispensables/
👥 Besoin d'aide ? Contactez notre équipe Services aux Chercheurs 🆘 https://www.bibliotheque-diderot.fr/acces-rapides/formulaires-de-contact/contacter-les-services-aux-chercheurs qui vous accompagnera selon vos besoins !
#openscience #HAL #GreenOA #OpenAccess #licences #scienceouverte

Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #WoltersKluwer) falsely asserting that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs. dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.... (#paywalled) The article never mentions no-fee OA journals ( #DiamondOA ) or no-fee OA repositories ( #GreenOA ). #ScholComm

Update. Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #WoltersKluwer) falsely asserting that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004612
(#paywalled)

General thesis: Paying APCs is a hardship (true) and the prices are going up (true). Therefore, to help medical students publish OA, medical schools should fund their APCs.

The article never mentions no-fee OA journals (#DiamondOA) or no-fee OA repositories (#GreenOA).

#ScholComm

🆔 Last week, the final Halathon of 2025 took place, with the second session held at the INPHYNI laboratory of Université Côte d’Azur. This second session, following the Halathon in November, once again made it possible to work on the quality of researcher profiles in order to improve the visibility of scientific outputs. The agenda therefore included creating accounts and idHALs, merging accounts (subsequently carried out by the CCSD - Centre for Direct Scientific Communication), as well as work on other identifiers, notably ORCid, arXiv, and IdRef.

The Halathons will resume in January! 📅

----------
🆔 La semaine dernière s'est tenu le dernier Halathon de 2025, avec la deuxième session organisée au laboratoire INPHYNI d'Université Côte d'Azur. Cette seconde intervention après le halathon de novembre a permis à nouveau de travailler sur la qualité des profils chercheurs afin d'améliorer la visibilité des productions scientifiques. Au menu donc : création de compte et d'idHAL, fusions de comptes (réalisées ensuite par le CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), mais aussi travaux sur d'autres identifiants, notamment ORCID, arXiv et IdRef !

Les halathons reprendront en janvier ! 📅

#openscience #greenOA #digitalid #orcid #arxiv #HAL

1/ I'm sympathetic to #NIH-funded authors who want to publish in certain #APC-based #OpenAccess journals and can't find the money to pay the APCs. But it's false to say that they must publish in those journals, in any other APC-based OA journals, or even in OA journals. Shame on _Inside Higher Ed_ for leaving this false impression..
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/research/2025/12/05/nih-policy-holding-researchers-hostage

PS: I repeat: Compliance with the NIH OA policy is free of charge. Moreover, compliance is all about depositing in a certain repository, not publishing in a certain journal or kind of journal. The NIH has a #GreenOA policy, not a #GoldOA policy. The same is true for all the other federal agencies with OA policies, not just the NIH. When a journal charges NIH-funded authors an APC to publish, the fee is to publish in that particular journal, not to comply with the NIH policy. Don't be fooled by the widespread misunderstanding that compliance with these policies requires paying any kind of fee. Don't be fooled by journals and publishers that cynically spread this myth themselves or leave it uncorrected. You can help by correcting this falsehood wherever you see it. You can also help by working with hiring, promotion, tenure, and funding committees to care more about the quality of research than the journals in which it is published.

🧵

#APCs #NelsonMemo #NIH #OpenAccess #OAintheUSA #PublicAccess #Repositories

[Veille] vidéos des 2 journées "30 ans de Mathdoc" en ligne sur
@canal-u.bsky.social
=> https://www.canal-u.tv/chaines/cm/mathdoc-30-annees-au-service-de-la-communaute-mathematique
Supports ici https://indico.math.cnrs.fr/event/14572/timetable/
#maths #openaccess #openscience #journals #commons #DiamondOA #GOldOA #GreenOA #researchdata

"For Researchers in the Humanities, Is Open Really Fair?"
https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/open-knowledge/2025/for-researchers-in-the-humanities-is-open-really-fair

PS: This article objects to #APCs and "transformative" (#ReadAndPublish) agreements, especially in the humanities. So far, so good. But then it leaves the false impression that all or most #OpenAccess falls into those two categories, which is false and harmful. It never mentions #GreenOA. It mentions #DiamondOA once, for books, and never for articles. It's strong on problems and very weak and even misleading on solutions.

I share the objections to APCs and read-and-publish agreements. I wrote stronger versions of them, extended to all disciplines, for the Budapest Open Access Initiative 20th anniversary statement.
https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/

I'm in the humanities and (with the exception of one 1999 book) have made all my books and articles OA. I've never paid an APC and never will. I boycott APC-based publishers both as an author and referee and encourage others to do so.

Scholars in the humanities need accurate info about their OA options, not one-sided criticism of OA as such.

#BOAI20 #Humanities

Update. #SocArXiv (@socarxiv) is dealing with a similar problem by requiring submitters to have #ORCIDs and tightening its focus on the social sciences.
https://socopen.org/2025/11/19/socarxiv-submission-rule-changes/

#GreenOA #Preprints #Repositories

I applaud the new #StockholmDeclaration for the reform of academic publishing.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.251805

It calls for action on four high-level principles, and makes 34 specific recommendations under those four heads. Here are the four:

"(i) Academia should resume control of publishing using non-profit publishing models (e.g. diamond open-access). (ii) Adjust incentive systems to merit quality, not quantity, in a reputation economy where the gaming of publication numbers and citation metrics distorts the perception of academic excellence. (iii) Implement mechanisms to prevent and detect fake publications and fraud which are independent of publishers. (iv) Draft and implement legislations, regulations and policies to increase publishing quality and integrity."

I just signed it and hope you will too. When you sign, you can weigh in separately on each of the 34 specific recommendations.
https://sciii-it.org/stockholm-declaration/

#AI #Assessment #DiamondOA #GreenOA #Integrity #Nonprofit #OpenAccess #OpenInfrastructure #OpenSource #Publishing #Repositories #RightsRetention #ScholComm

Hier, intervention à la conférence "Collaborations in Algebra, Representation theory and Ethics" organisée à l'UMPA de l' @ENSdeLyon pour parler #openscience et #openaccess avec F. Codet et Filippo A.E. Nuccio devant de jeunes mathématiciens, dans le cadre des débats sur l'éthique en sciences. Super expérience. Merci aux organisateurs !
🔗 https://sites.google.com/uniroma1.it/caremath/home-page
#ethics #maths #APC #academicpublishing #GreenOA #GoldOA #DiamondOA

🍵 Envie d’un café virtuel autour de la science ouverte ?
Aujourd'hui deuxième rendez-vous cette semaine pour échanger (librement et sans inscription !) autour de la publication en open access et de la visibilité de vos travaux de recherche 👇

📅 Mardi 28 octobre – 13h
Café virtuel « Boostez votre visibilité grâce à l’open access »
💬 Animé par Antony FORNES, chargé d’ingénierie documentaire, et Arthur Rosier, coordinateur Données & Archives de la recherche à la DiBSO
➡️ https://lnkd.in/ewZtrrC2

Cafés virtuels ouvert à toutes et tous, sans inscription ni authentification !

#OpenScience #UniCA #Recherche #DiBSO #scienceouverte #greenOA #openaccess

Wussten Sie, dass Sie Ihre Publikation auch nach der Verlagsveröffentlichung frei zugänglich machen können? 🌱

Green Open Access macht’s möglich – TORE hilft Ihnen dabei!

#OAWeek #OpenAccess #GreenOA #TORE

https://www.tub.tuhh.de/blog/2025/10/24/oaweek2025-selbstbestimmt-veroeffentlichen-green-open-access-mit-tore-als-echte-alternative/

Jack Baker was falsely accused of #plagiarism (by his plagiarist!) and now recommends #GreenOA, especially for #preprints, to establish your priority.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02947-3
(#paywalled)

I've been making this point for years and welcome this chance to reiterate. Green OA doesn't invite scooping and plagiarism. It deters them.

On scooping, see my 2012 book at p. 43: "Green OA for preprints [provides] the earliest possible time-stamp to establish the author’s priority." On plagiarism, see p. 24: "Not all plagiarists are smart, but the smart ones will not steal from OA sources indexed in every search engine."
http://bit.ly/oa-book

#OpenAccess #ScholComm

The federal govt shutdown is halting or slowing operations at #OpenAccess #repositories like #PubMedCentral: "Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

#GreenOA #OAintheUSA #USPol #USPolitics

New study: "Open access publishing: is urology ready? A survey of authors, readers, and editorial board’s knowledge, impressions and satisfaction."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-025-05928-3
(#paywalled)

Not a good way to run a survey or report the results.

* The results are paywalled.
* The article does not include the survey questions.
* The survey defines #GoldOA, #GreenOA, #DiamondOA, and #HybridOA. But the article only reports the attitudes toward APC-based gold OA. No surprise, they're negative. Yet disdain for #APCs only strengthens the reason to ask about green and diamond OA. If the survey did ask, then what are the answers? If it didn't ask, then why not?
* The survey gives a false definition of green OA, saying that it's always embargoed. That's especially odd since under current US federal agency policies, it's never embargoed.

#Embargoes #ScholComm

3/ The #NIH policy is all-green (#GreenOA). It requires deposit in an OA repository, PubMed Central (#PMC). It does not require publishing in an OA journal.

If you're an NIH-funded author and a journal tells you that you must pay an #APC to comply with the policy, it's lying. Compliance with the policy is free of charge. If a journal asks you to pay an APC, it's only to publish in that particular journal. Consider taking your submission elsewhere.

@OpenSciPlatform
Like the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation who now require green OA instead of feeding research money to major publishers?
If yes, then good decision :)

#OpenScience #openaccess #greenOA

#SPARC has released its own new info on the new #NIH #OpenAccess policy.
https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Update-to-NIH-PA-Policy-Deadline.pdf

Excerpt:

<blockquote>
● The Policy requires immediate public access to articles -- #embargoes are no longer allowed.
● NIH reiterates authors do not have to pay a fee to comply with the Policy.
● The Policy applies to manuscripts accepted for publication on or after July 1, 2025. This means the Policy will apply to existing grants if an article is accepted on or after that date.
● The Policy requires that final peer-reviewed manuscripts be submitted to #PubMedCentral (#PMC) upon acceptance to be made publicly available immediately upon publication.
● The Policy requires that grantees explicitly grant the NIH the right to make the manuscript available in PMC without an embargo.
● The Policy does not explicitly grant full reuse rights of the manuscript to the public.
</blockquote>

#Copyright #Embargoes #GreenOA #Medicine #NelsonMemo #OSTP

The #NIH just released new info on its zero-embargo #OpenAccess policy, which takes effect next week (July 1).
https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access

This includes:

* a new overview of the policy itself
https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access/nih-public-access-policy-overview

* a new overview of the methods for submitting papers to comply with the policy
https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access/submitting-pubmed-central

* and a new FAQ.
https://grants.nih.gov/faqs#/public-access-policy

#Embargoes #GreenOA #Medicine #NelsonMemo #PubMedCentral #OSTP

The Royal Society of Chemistry (#RSC) just issued a vague and puzzling statement about its plans.
https://www.rsc.org/news/our-evolving-approach-to-open-access

It once planned to convert all its journals to #OpenAccess by 2028. By which it apparently meant #APC-based OA. But after talking with customers in different parts of the world, it learned that some regions "are not yet ready for fully OA." By which it means APC-based OA. "The resounding message we heard over and over is that one size cannot fit all." By which it means that not all can pay APCs.

"It became clear that we needed to adapt our vision for openness to account for a landscape that is increasing in complexity and no longer coalescing around a single direction for open research." As if the global landscape had ever coalesced around support for APCs.

But RSC is still committed to some kind of transition to OA. "We are now shaping our future OA approach to support authors in ways that suit them best in a local context."

If it plans to support no-APC forms of OA, it carefully avoids saying so. It never mentions #GreenOA and never endorses #DiamondOA. (It mentions one diamond OA initiative in Africa, but it's not an RSC initiative.)

I'm guessing that it plans to rely on locally customized #ReadAndPublish agreements. (I've argued that all such agreements use APCs in disguise.) But if so, why not say so? If it has other models in mind for regions "not ready" for APC-based OA, why not say what they are?

#APCs #South #ScholComm

⏰ Aujourd'hui 23 juin et jusqu'au 25, c'est #casuhal2025 !
Merci aux collègues qui font vivre ce formidable réseau d’utilisateurs de @hal_fr => https://casuhal2025.sciencesconf.org/?lang=fr
#HAL #openaccess #openscience #openaccessrepositories #greenOA

Today in how #Elsevier ruins my mood: Pure repositories pollute #Unpaywall with garbage data.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396127
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396126

#OAbot #GreenOA #OpenAccess