home.social

#apcs — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #apcs, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The US Government Accountability Office (#GAO) just reviewed the #OpenAccess policies at nine federal agencies.
    gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

    A few highlights:

    * Among other things, GAO looked for compliance with the #NelsonMemo. This is further evidence that the #Trump admin supports the memo.

    * It encourages #NSF and #USDA to go further to ensure #reuse rights. (That would be good.) But it assumes that the other agencies are already doing enough to ensure reuse rights. (I can't agree with this.)

    * It praises #NIH for taking steps to reduce money spent on grantee #APCs, and encourages other agencies to follow the NIH lead on this.

    * In a few places it leaves the false impression (1) that all OA journals charge APCs and (2) that all publishers are responding the federal policies by charging APCs to publish fed-funded research.

    #PublicAccess #ScholComm #USPol #USPolitics

  2. The US Government Accountability Office (#GAO) just reviewed the #OpenAccess policies at nine federal agencies.
    gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

    A few highlights:

    * Among other things, GAO looked for compliance with the #NelsonMemo. This is further evidence that the #Trump admin supports the memo.

    * It encourages #NSF and #USDA to go further to ensure #reuse rights. (That would be good.) But it assumes that the other agencies are already doing enough to ensure reuse rights. (I can't agree with this.)

    * It praises #NIH for taking steps to reduce money spent on grantee #APCs, and encourages other agencies to follow the NIH lead on this.

    * In a few places it leaves the false impression (1) that all OA journals charge APCs and (2) that all publishers are responding the federal policies by charging APCs to publish fed-funded research.

    #PublicAccess #ScholComm #USPol #USPolitics

  3. The US Government Accountability Office (#GAO) just reviewed the #OpenAccess policies at nine federal agencies.
    gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

    A few highlights:

    * Among other things, GAO looked for compliance with the #NelsonMemo. This is further evidence that the #Trump admin supports the memo.

    * It encourages #NSF and #USDA to go further to ensure #reuse rights. (That would be good.) But it assumes that the other agencies are already doing enough to ensure reuse rights. (I can't agree with this.)

    * It praises #NIH for taking steps to reduce money spent on grantee #APCs, and encourages other agencies to follow the NIH lead on this.

    * In a few places it leaves the false impression (1) that all OA journals charge APCs and (2) that all publishers are responding the federal policies by charging APCs to publish fed-funded research.

    #PublicAccess #ScholComm #USPol #USPolitics

  4. The US Government Accountability Office (#GAO) just reviewed the #OpenAccess policies at nine federal agencies.
    gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

    A few highlights:

    * Among other things, GAO looked for compliance with the #NelsonMemo. This is further evidence that the #Trump admin supports the memo.

    * It encourages #NSF and #USDA to go further to ensure #reuse rights. (That would be good.) But it assumes that the other agencies are already doing enough to ensure reuse rights. (I can't agree with this.)

    * It praises #NIH for taking steps to reduce money spent on grantee #APCs, and encourages other agencies to follow the NIH lead on this.

    * In a few places it leaves the false impression (1) that all OA journals charge APCs and (2) that all publishers are responding the federal policies by charging APCs to publish fed-funded research.

    #PublicAccess #ScholComm #USPol #USPolitics

  5. The US Government Accountability Office (#GAO) just reviewed the #OpenAccess policies at nine federal agencies.
    gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

    A few highlights:

    * Among other things, GAO looked for compliance with the #NelsonMemo. This is further evidence that the #Trump admin supports the memo.

    * It encourages #NSF and #USDA to go further to ensure #reuse rights. (That would be good.) But it assumes that the other agencies are already doing enough to ensure reuse rights. (I can't agree with this.)

    * It praises #NIH for taking steps to reduce money spent on grantee #APCs, and encourages other agencies to follow the NIH lead on this.

    * In a few places it leaves the false impression (1) that all OA journals charge APCs and (2) that all publishers are responding the federal policies by charging APCs to publish fed-funded research.

    #PublicAccess #ScholComm #USPol #USPolitics

  6. Update. Another article made it through peer review (at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) leading with two false generalizations, that (all or most) #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs and that (all or most) paid APCs are paid by authors.
    journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstrac
    (#paywalled)

    Most OA journals are #DiamondOA and charge no APCs.
    doaj.org/

    Most paid APCs are paid by funders or employers, not by authors out of pocket. (Footnote: The evidence is clearer for the global north than the global south.)
    suber.pubpub.org/pub/j1jk6hu9

    On the plus side, the article reports that in field of orthopaedic surgery, OA articles have higher citation counts and altmetric scores than non-OA articles.

    #Medicine #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

  7. Update. Another article made it through peer review (at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) leading with two false generalizations, that (all or most) #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs and that (all or most) paid APCs are paid by authors.
    journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstrac
    (#paywalled)

    Most OA journals are #DiamondOA and charge no APCs.
    doaj.org/

    Most paid APCs are paid by funders or employers, not by authors out of pocket. (Footnote: The evidence is clearer for the global north than the global south.)
    suber.pubpub.org/pub/j1jk6hu9

    On the plus side, the article reports that in field of orthopaedic surgery, OA articles have higher citation counts and altmetric scores than non-OA articles.

    #Medicine #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

  8. Update. Another article made it through peer review (at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) leading with two false generalizations, that (all or most) #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs and that (all or most) paid APCs are paid by authors.
    journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstrac
    (#paywalled)

    Most OA journals are #DiamondOA and charge no APCs.
    doaj.org/

    Most paid APCs are paid by funders or employers, not by authors out of pocket. (Footnote: The evidence is clearer for the global north than the global south.)
    suber.pubpub.org/pub/j1jk6hu9

    On the plus side, the article reports that in field of orthopaedic surgery, OA articles have higher citation counts and altmetric scores than non-OA articles.

    #Medicine #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

  9. Update. Another article made it through peer review (at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) leading with two false generalizations, that (all or most) #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs and that (all or most) paid APCs are paid by authors.
    journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstrac
    (#paywalled)

    Most OA journals are #DiamondOA and charge no APCs.
    doaj.org/

    Most paid APCs are paid by funders or employers, not by authors out of pocket. (Footnote: The evidence is clearer for the global north than the global south.)
    suber.pubpub.org/pub/j1jk6hu9

    On the plus side, the article reports that in field of orthopaedic surgery, OA articles have higher citation counts and altmetric scores than non-OA articles.

    #Medicine #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

  10. Update. Another article made it through peer review (at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) leading with two false generalizations, that (all or most) #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs and that (all or most) paid APCs are paid by authors.
    journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstrac
    (#paywalled)

    Most OA journals are #DiamondOA and charge no APCs.
    doaj.org/

    Most paid APCs are paid by funders or employers, not by authors out of pocket. (Footnote: The evidence is clearer for the global north than the global south.)
    suber.pubpub.org/pub/j1jk6hu9

    On the plus side, the article reports that in field of orthopaedic surgery, OA articles have higher citation counts and altmetric scores than non-OA articles.

    #Medicine #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

  11. Update. The passage in the #Trump budget criticizing expensive #subscriptions and #APCs (previous post, this thread) triggered a debate in the House of Representatives.

    "US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices."
    nature.com/articles/d41586-026

    "From ‘paper mills’ that sell authorships on fake or low-quality research papers to the costs associated with open-access publishing, US lawmakers are paying increasing attention to widely debated issues in scientific publishing. In a rare show of unity, members of the US House of Representatives from both sides of the political aisle agreed at a hearing that these issues deserve more attention from government — but there was less unity on what the solutions should be."

    #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm

  12. Update. The passage in the #Trump budget criticizing expensive #subscriptions and #APCs (previous post, this thread) triggered a debate in the House of Representatives.

    "US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices."
    nature.com/articles/d41586-026

    "From ‘paper mills’ that sell authorships on fake or low-quality research papers to the costs associated with open-access publishing, US lawmakers are paying increasing attention to widely debated issues in scientific publishing. In a rare show of unity, members of the US House of Representatives from both sides of the political aisle agreed at a hearing that these issues deserve more attention from government — but there was less unity on what the solutions should be."

    #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm

  13. Update. The passage in the #Trump budget criticizing expensive #subscriptions and #APCs (previous post, this thread) triggered a debate in the House of Representatives.

    "US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices."
    nature.com/articles/d41586-026

    "From ‘paper mills’ that sell authorships on fake or low-quality research papers to the costs associated with open-access publishing, US lawmakers are paying increasing attention to widely debated issues in scientific publishing. In a rare show of unity, members of the US House of Representatives from both sides of the political aisle agreed at a hearing that these issues deserve more attention from government — but there was less unity on what the solutions should be."

    #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm

  14. Update. The passage in the #Trump budget criticizing expensive #subscriptions and #APCs (previous post, this thread) triggered a debate in the House of Representatives.

    "US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices."
    nature.com/articles/d41586-026

    "From ‘paper mills’ that sell authorships on fake or low-quality research papers to the costs associated with open-access publishing, US lawmakers are paying increasing attention to widely debated issues in scientific publishing. In a rare show of unity, members of the US House of Representatives from both sides of the political aisle agreed at a hearing that these issues deserve more attention from government — but there was less unity on what the solutions should be."

    #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm

  15. Update. The passage in the #Trump budget criticizing expensive #subscriptions and #APCs (previous post, this thread) triggered a debate in the House of Representatives.

    "US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices."
    nature.com/articles/d41586-026

    "From ‘paper mills’ that sell authorships on fake or low-quality research papers to the costs associated with open-access publishing, US lawmakers are paying increasing attention to widely debated issues in scientific publishing. In a rare show of unity, members of the US House of Representatives from both sides of the political aisle agreed at a hearing that these issues deserve more attention from government — but there was less unity on what the solutions should be."

    #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm

  16. Update. Here's the key passage from the new #Trump budget proposing a "Government-Wide Prohibition on Publishing and Subscription Fees." See p. 17.
    whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uplo

    "The Budget ends the diversion of research dollars to high priced publishers across the Government. The Budget prohibits the use of Federal funds for expensive subscriptions to academic journals and prohibitively high publishing costs unless required by Federal statute or approved in advance by a Federal agency. Research funded by taxpayers should be publicly accessible; yet many publications charge the Government to both publish and to access the same research study. There are numerous low-cost outlets to make federally-funded research publicly available."

    h/t Jim O'Donnell

    #APCs #DoubleDipping #OpenAccess #Publishing #ScholComm #Subscriptions

  17. #CancerResearchUK will stop paying #APCs for funded researchers. Good. Unfortunately its announcement is marred by false assertions and assumptions about #OpenAccess. news.cancerresearchuk.org/2026/04/01/w... I say more on Mastodon. fediscience.org/@petersuber/...

    Why we won’t be funding open a...

  18. #CancerResearchUK will stop paying #APCs for funded researchers.
    news.cancerresearchuk.org/2026

    PS. So far, so good. There are strong reasons to move away from APCs. For a summary, see Recommendation 3 of the Budapest Open Access Initiative 20th anniversary statement in 2022. (Disclosure: I was the lead author.)
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Unfortunately the Cancer Research UK announcement is marred by several false assertions and assumptions about #OpenAccess.

    * Its narrow decision is to stop funding APCs, but its headline is that it will stop funding OA publishing as such. It leaves the distinct false impression that all OA journals charge APCs.

    * Deep in the text it says that OA "hasn't worked. At least not in its current form." That looks like a recognition that not all OA depends on APCs. But it isn't explicit and didn't prevent careless language elsewhere in the statement.

    * It never acknowledges that no-APC OA (#DiamondOA) journals exist, let alone that they constitute the majority of OA journals.

    * It does acknowledge the existence of no-APC OA through repositories, or #GreenOA. But it falsely suggests that green OA must be embargoed. Just to give one notable set of counter-examples, all the federal OA policies in the US require unembargoed green OA.

    #ScholComm

  19. Update. Here's an unrefereed letter to the editor protesting -- with justice -- that "top-ranked scientific publications [could] become the preserve of 'rich' groups." But it relies on the false assumption that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs. Hence, it doesn't even mention #DiamondOA solutions to this problem.
    journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/m

  20. Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #Elsevier) with the false claim that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs. www.journalofsurgicalresearch.com/article/S002... #ScholComm

  21. Update. Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #Elsevier) with the false claim that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs.
    journalofsurgicalresearch.com/

    I only have access to the abstract, not the full text. If I learn that the article acknowledges that no-APC OA (#DiamondOA) journals exist, and even outnumber APC-based OA journals, then I'll correct this post. But I'll still criticize the authors and editors for publishing a false claim in the abstract, namely, "Open access (OA) publishing…requires article processing charges (APCs)."

  22. Today is the 24th birthday of the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Best known for catalyzing the #OpenAccess movement in 2002, the BOAI has been continuously active and formed a nonprofit organization just last year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    See the org's progress report on its first year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    The latest version of the BOAI recommendations is its 20th anniversary statement.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    In contrast to the earlier BOAI statements, which made many recommendations, the 20th anniversary statement deliberately focuses on a small number of top priorities:

    1. Adopting #OpenInfrastructure
    2. Reforming #ResearchAssessment
    3. Moving away from #APCs
    4. Moving away from #ReadAndPublish agreements.

    I'm proud of my contributions to #BOAI (2002), #BOAI10 (2012), and #BOAI20 (2022), and honored to serve on the org steering committee.

    Happy #ValentinesDay to all who work for #OpenAccess worldwide.

  23. Today is the 24th birthday of the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Best known for catalyzing the #OpenAccess movement in 2002, the BOAI has been continuously active and formed a nonprofit organization just last year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    See the org's progress report on its first year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    The latest version of the BOAI recommendations is its 20th anniversary statement.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    In contrast to the earlier BOAI statements, which made many recommendations, the 20th anniversary statement deliberately focuses on a small number of top priorities:

    1. Adopting #OpenInfrastructure
    2. Reforming #ResearchAssessment
    3. Moving away from #APCs
    4. Moving away from #ReadAndPublish agreements.

    I'm proud of my contributions to #BOAI (2002), #BOAI10 (2012), and #BOAI20 (2022), and honored to serve on the org steering committee.

    Happy #ValentinesDay to all who work for #OpenAccess worldwide.

  24. Today is the 24th birthday of the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Best known for catalyzing the #OpenAccess movement in 2002, the BOAI has been continuously active and formed a nonprofit organization just last year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    See the org's progress report on its first year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    The latest version of the BOAI recommendations is its 20th anniversary statement.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    In contrast to the earlier BOAI statements, which made many recommendations, the 20th anniversary statement deliberately focuses on a small number of top priorities:

    1. Adopting #OpenInfrastructure
    2. Reforming #ResearchAssessment
    3. Moving away from #APCs
    4. Moving away from #ReadAndPublish agreements.

    I'm proud of my contributions to #BOAI (2002), #BOAI10 (2012), and #BOAI20 (2022), and honored to serve on the org steering committee.

    Happy #ValentinesDay to all who work for #OpenAccess worldwide.

  25. Today is the 24th birthday of the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Best known for catalyzing the #OpenAccess movement in 2002, the BOAI has been continuously active and formed a nonprofit organization just last year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    See the org's progress report on its first year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    The latest version of the BOAI recommendations is its 20th anniversary statement.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    In contrast to the earlier BOAI statements, which made many recommendations, the 20th anniversary statement deliberately focuses on a small number of top priorities:

    1. Adopting #OpenInfrastructure
    2. Reforming #ResearchAssessment
    3. Moving away from #APCs
    4. Moving away from #ReadAndPublish agreements.

    I'm proud of my contributions to #BOAI (2002), #BOAI10 (2012), and #BOAI20 (2022), and honored to serve on the org steering committee.

    Happy #ValentinesDay to all who work for #OpenAccess worldwide.

  26. Today is the 24th birthday of the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    Best known for catalyzing the #OpenAccess movement in 2002, the BOAI has been continuously active and formed a nonprofit organization just last year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    See the org's progress report on its first year.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    The latest version of the BOAI recommendations is its 20th anniversary statement.
    budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

    In contrast to the earlier BOAI statements, which made many recommendations, the 20th anniversary statement deliberately focuses on a small number of top priorities:

    1. Adopting #OpenInfrastructure
    2. Reforming #ResearchAssessment
    3. Moving away from #APCs
    4. Moving away from #ReadAndPublish agreements.

    I'm proud of my contributions to #BOAI (2002), #BOAI10 (2012), and #BOAI20 (2022), and honored to serve on the org steering committee.

    Happy #ValentinesDay to all who work for #OpenAccess worldwide.

  27. Update. Here's another piece critical of #APCs (so far, so good), and reviewing other people's criticisms of APCs (even better). Yet it makes the wholly false assertion that all #OpenAccess journals charge APCs. ("In open access, instead of readers having to pay, the paper’s authors cover the expenses of publication.") It says this even though it also summarizes a position explicitly referring to #DiamondOA journals. It never mentions that most OA journals do not charge APCs.
    undark.org/2026/01/07/apc-scie

  28. _Environmental Health Perspectives_ was a #DiamondOA journal formerly published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#NIEHS, within the #NIH). When #Trump slashed the NIH and NIEHS budgets, the journal began the process of laying itself down. But now the American Chemical Society (#ACS) will adopt it. Under the ACS, it will remain #OpenAccess but start charging #APCs.

    See the ACS announcement.
    newswise.com/articles/environm

    See the coverage in Chemistry World.
    chemistryworld.com/news/leadin

    #Chemistry #Funding #USPol #USPolitics

  29. _Environmental Health Perspectives_ was a #DiamondOA journal formerly published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#NIEHS, within the #NIH). When #Trump slashed the NIH and NIEHS budgets, the journal began the process of laying itself down. But now the American Chemical Society (#ACS) will adopt it. Under the ACS, it will remain #OpenAccess but start charging #APCs.

    See the ACS announcement.
    newswise.com/articles/environm

    See the coverage in Chemistry World.
    chemistryworld.com/news/leadin

    #Chemistry #Funding #USPol #USPolitics

  30. _Environmental Health Perspectives_ was a #DiamondOA journal formerly published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#NIEHS, within the #NIH). When #Trump slashed the NIH and NIEHS budgets, the journal began the process of laying itself down. But now the American Chemical Society (#ACS) will adopt it. Under the ACS, it will remain #OpenAccess but start charging #APCs.

    See the ACS announcement.
    newswise.com/articles/environm

    See the coverage in Chemistry World.
    chemistryworld.com/news/leadin

    #Chemistry #Funding #USPol #USPolitics

  31. _Environmental Health Perspectives_ was a #DiamondOA journal formerly published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#NIEHS, within the #NIH). When #Trump slashed the NIH and NIEHS budgets, the journal began the process of laying itself down. But now the American Chemical Society (#ACS) will adopt it. Under the ACS, it will remain #OpenAccess but start charging #APCs.

    See the ACS announcement.
    newswise.com/articles/environm

    See the coverage in Chemistry World.
    chemistryworld.com/news/leadin

    #Chemistry #Funding #USPol #USPolitics

  32. _Environmental Health Perspectives_ was a #DiamondOA journal formerly published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#NIEHS, within the #NIH). When #Trump slashed the NIH and NIEHS budgets, the journal began the process of laying itself down. But now the American Chemical Society (#ACS) will adopt it. Under the ACS, it will remain #OpenAccess but start charging #APCs.

    See the ACS announcement.
    newswise.com/articles/environm

    See the coverage in Chemistry World.
    chemistryworld.com/news/leadin

    #Chemistry #Funding #USPol #USPolitics

  33. Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #WoltersKluwer) falsely asserting that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs. dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.... (#paywalled) The article never mentions no-fee OA journals ( #DiamondOA ) or no-fee OA repositories ( #GreenOA ). #ScholComm

  34. Update. Here's another article that made it through peer review (at #WoltersKluwer) falsely asserting that all #OpenAccess journals charge #APCs.
    dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000
    (#paywalled)

    General thesis: Paying APCs is a hardship (true) and the prices are going up (true). Therefore, to help medical students publish OA, medical schools should fund their APCs.

    The article never mentions no-fee OA journals (#DiamondOA) or no-fee OA repositories (#GreenOA).

    #ScholComm