home.social

#open-access — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #open-access, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: July 3, 2026 at 09:41PM
    SOURCE: PsiAN Psychotherapy Action Network

    TITLE: OMB's "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance" Would Reshape Mental Health Research. Comment by July 13.

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed a rule called the Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance (OMB 2026-0034) that would rewrite how every federal agency, including NIH and NIMH, funds and manages research grants.

    It would let political appointees override peer review, allow ongoing studies to be terminated at any time, restrict international research collaboration, and could bar research into mental healthcare disparities altogether. Psychotherapy Action Network submitted its own institutional comment opposing the rule, but we also need individual comments from members. The public comment period closes July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern, and it takes about ten minutes to submit one.

    What the Rule Would Do

    •Section 200.205: A political appointee, not a peer reviewer, would have final say over which grants are funded, and could not simply defer to expert recommendations.

    •Section 200.340: Agencies could terminate active, multi-year grants at any time if they decide an award no longer serves "the national interest," even mid-study.

    •Section 200.432: Researchers would need advance federal approval just to attend a conference.

    •Sections 200.220 and 200.202: International scientific collaboration would be presumptively prohibited, and awards would need to fit a "domestic first" framework.

    •Sections 200.218 and 200.300: Research examining health disparities, or framed around diversity, equity, and inclusion or gender ideology, could not be federally funded.

    •Sections 200.454 and 200.461: Journal subscriptions and open-access publication fees would become unallowable costs, conflicting with the existing federal open-access mandate.

    •Section 200.204: Agencies could exempt grant competitions from public notice, narrowing who even knows funding is available.

    Why This Matters to Our FieldPsychotherapy Action Network's advocacy for depth and relationship-based psychotherapy rests on an evidence base built largely through NIH- and NIMH-funded research, including longitudinal outcome studies and research on unequal access to quality mental healthcare. This rule threatens that evidence base at every stage: which studies get funded, whether ongoing studies survive to completion, whether disparities research can be funded at all, and whether the international scholarly exchange that shaped psychoanalytic and psychodynamic theory can continue.

    What You Can DoSubmit your comment here: regulations.gov/docket/OMB-202

    A strong comment covers four points:

    Who you are. No credentials required, and you may comment anonymously.

    •Which provision concerns you, cited by section number (see the list above).

    •The concrete harm to your work, your patients, or your field.

    •Your request: that OMB withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety.

    The Most Effective Structure of a comment - created by Elizabeth Ginexi:

    First paragraph: Say who you are and why you are qualified to comment. You do not need credentials — being affected is enough. Examples: “I am a graduate student in immunology at [university] who receives NIH funding.” Or: “I am a member of the public who cares about federally funded medical research.” Or: “I am a faculty member whose research on [topic] has been supported by [agency] for [X] years.”

    •Second paragraph: Identify the specific provision(s) that concern you by section number, and explain what they would do. You do not need to quote the rule directly — just explain what you understand it to mean in plain terms.

    •Third paragraph: Explain the concrete harm. What would happen to you, your lab, your institution, your community, or your field if this provision takes effect? The more specific and personal, the better.

    •Closing: State clearly what you want OMB to do. This can be as simple as: “I urge OMB to withdraw this provision” or “I urge OMB not to finalize this rule.”

    Identical or templated comments count as a single comment to OMB, so write in your own words.

    The deadline is July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern.






    Read Our Comment

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    -------------------------------------------------

    The Psychotherapy Action Network (PsiAN) advocates for awareness, policies and access to psychotherapies that create meaningful change. They offer membership and educational events.

    Learn more at psian.org .

    The PsiAN blog can be found at: psian.org/blog

    This news robot is NOT officially affiliated with PsiAN. It merely rebroadcasts from their blog. Responses posted here are not monitored by PsiAN.

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #PsiAN #psychotherapist #psychoanalytic #psychodynamic #depththerapy #OMBRegulation #FederalFunding #MentalHealthResearch #NIH #NIMH #ResearchFundingPolicy #OpenScience #DisparitiesResearch #OpenAccess #PublicCommentDeadline

  2. DATE: July 3, 2026 at 09:41PM
    SOURCE: PsiAN Psychotherapy Action Network

    TITLE: OMB's "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance" Would Reshape Mental Health Research. Comment by July 13.

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed a rule called the Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance (OMB 2026-0034) that would rewrite how every federal agency, including NIH and NIMH, funds and manages research grants.

    It would let political appointees override peer review, allow ongoing studies to be terminated at any time, restrict international research collaboration, and could bar research into mental healthcare disparities altogether. Psychotherapy Action Network submitted its own institutional comment opposing the rule, but we also need individual comments from members. The public comment period closes July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern, and it takes about ten minutes to submit one.

    What the Rule Would Do

    •Section 200.205: A political appointee, not a peer reviewer, would have final say over which grants are funded, and could not simply defer to expert recommendations.

    •Section 200.340: Agencies could terminate active, multi-year grants at any time if they decide an award no longer serves "the national interest," even mid-study.

    •Section 200.432: Researchers would need advance federal approval just to attend a conference.

    •Sections 200.220 and 200.202: International scientific collaboration would be presumptively prohibited, and awards would need to fit a "domestic first" framework.

    •Sections 200.218 and 200.300: Research examining health disparities, or framed around diversity, equity, and inclusion or gender ideology, could not be federally funded.

    •Sections 200.454 and 200.461: Journal subscriptions and open-access publication fees would become unallowable costs, conflicting with the existing federal open-access mandate.

    •Section 200.204: Agencies could exempt grant competitions from public notice, narrowing who even knows funding is available.

    Why This Matters to Our FieldPsychotherapy Action Network's advocacy for depth and relationship-based psychotherapy rests on an evidence base built largely through NIH- and NIMH-funded research, including longitudinal outcome studies and research on unequal access to quality mental healthcare. This rule threatens that evidence base at every stage: which studies get funded, whether ongoing studies survive to completion, whether disparities research can be funded at all, and whether the international scholarly exchange that shaped psychoanalytic and psychodynamic theory can continue.

    What You Can DoSubmit your comment here: regulations.gov/docket/OMB-202

    A strong comment covers four points:

    Who you are. No credentials required, and you may comment anonymously.

    •Which provision concerns you, cited by section number (see the list above).

    •The concrete harm to your work, your patients, or your field.

    •Your request: that OMB withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety.

    The Most Effective Structure of a comment - created by Elizabeth Ginexi:

    First paragraph: Say who you are and why you are qualified to comment. You do not need credentials — being affected is enough. Examples: “I am a graduate student in immunology at [university] who receives NIH funding.” Or: “I am a member of the public who cares about federally funded medical research.” Or: “I am a faculty member whose research on [topic] has been supported by [agency] for [X] years.”

    •Second paragraph: Identify the specific provision(s) that concern you by section number, and explain what they would do. You do not need to quote the rule directly — just explain what you understand it to mean in plain terms.

    •Third paragraph: Explain the concrete harm. What would happen to you, your lab, your institution, your community, or your field if this provision takes effect? The more specific and personal, the better.

    •Closing: State clearly what you want OMB to do. This can be as simple as: “I urge OMB to withdraw this provision” or “I urge OMB not to finalize this rule.”

    Identical or templated comments count as a single comment to OMB, so write in your own words.

    The deadline is July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern.






    Read Our Comment

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    -------------------------------------------------

    The Psychotherapy Action Network (PsiAN) advocates for awareness, policies and access to psychotherapies that create meaningful change. They offer membership and educational events.

    Learn more at psian.org .

    The PsiAN blog can be found at: psian.org/blog

    This news robot is NOT officially affiliated with PsiAN. It merely rebroadcasts from their blog. Responses posted here are not monitored by PsiAN.

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #PsiAN #psychotherapist #psychoanalytic #psychodynamic #depththerapy #OMBRegulation #FederalFunding #MentalHealthResearch #NIH #NIMH #ResearchFundingPolicy #OpenScience #DisparitiesResearch #OpenAccess #PublicCommentDeadline

  3. DATE: July 3, 2026 at 09:41PM
    SOURCE: PsiAN Psychotherapy Action Network

    TITLE: OMB's "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance" Would Reshape Mental Health Research. Comment by July 13.

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed a rule called the Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance (OMB 2026-0034) that would rewrite how every federal agency, including NIH and NIMH, funds and manages research grants.

    It would let political appointees override peer review, allow ongoing studies to be terminated at any time, restrict international research collaboration, and could bar research into mental healthcare disparities altogether. Psychotherapy Action Network submitted its own institutional comment opposing the rule, but we also need individual comments from members. The public comment period closes July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern, and it takes about ten minutes to submit one.

    What the Rule Would Do

    •Section 200.205: A political appointee, not a peer reviewer, would have final say over which grants are funded, and could not simply defer to expert recommendations.

    •Section 200.340: Agencies could terminate active, multi-year grants at any time if they decide an award no longer serves "the national interest," even mid-study.

    •Section 200.432: Researchers would need advance federal approval just to attend a conference.

    •Sections 200.220 and 200.202: International scientific collaboration would be presumptively prohibited, and awards would need to fit a "domestic first" framework.

    •Sections 200.218 and 200.300: Research examining health disparities, or framed around diversity, equity, and inclusion or gender ideology, could not be federally funded.

    •Sections 200.454 and 200.461: Journal subscriptions and open-access publication fees would become unallowable costs, conflicting with the existing federal open-access mandate.

    •Section 200.204: Agencies could exempt grant competitions from public notice, narrowing who even knows funding is available.

    Why This Matters to Our FieldPsychotherapy Action Network's advocacy for depth and relationship-based psychotherapy rests on an evidence base built largely through NIH- and NIMH-funded research, including longitudinal outcome studies and research on unequal access to quality mental healthcare. This rule threatens that evidence base at every stage: which studies get funded, whether ongoing studies survive to completion, whether disparities research can be funded at all, and whether the international scholarly exchange that shaped psychoanalytic and psychodynamic theory can continue.

    What You Can DoSubmit your comment here: regulations.gov/docket/OMB-202

    A strong comment covers four points:

    Who you are. No credentials required, and you may comment anonymously.

    •Which provision concerns you, cited by section number (see the list above).

    •The concrete harm to your work, your patients, or your field.

    •Your request: that OMB withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety.

    The Most Effective Structure of a comment - created by Elizabeth Ginexi:

    First paragraph: Say who you are and why you are qualified to comment. You do not need credentials — being affected is enough. Examples: “I am a graduate student in immunology at [university] who receives NIH funding.” Or: “I am a member of the public who cares about federally funded medical research.” Or: “I am a faculty member whose research on [topic] has been supported by [agency] for [X] years.”

    •Second paragraph: Identify the specific provision(s) that concern you by section number, and explain what they would do. You do not need to quote the rule directly — just explain what you understand it to mean in plain terms.

    •Third paragraph: Explain the concrete harm. What would happen to you, your lab, your institution, your community, or your field if this provision takes effect? The more specific and personal, the better.

    •Closing: State clearly what you want OMB to do. This can be as simple as: “I urge OMB to withdraw this provision” or “I urge OMB not to finalize this rule.”

    Identical or templated comments count as a single comment to OMB, so write in your own words.

    The deadline is July 13, 2026, at 11:59 PM Eastern.






    Read Our Comment

    URL: psian.org/blog/ombs-regulation

    -------------------------------------------------

    The Psychotherapy Action Network (PsiAN) advocates for awareness, policies and access to psychotherapies that create meaningful change. They offer membership and educational events.

    Learn more at psian.org .

    The PsiAN blog can be found at: psian.org/blog

    This news robot is NOT officially affiliated with PsiAN. It merely rebroadcasts from their blog. Responses posted here are not monitored by PsiAN.

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #PsiAN #psychotherapist #psychoanalytic #psychodynamic #depththerapy #OMBRegulation #FederalFunding #MentalHealthResearch #NIH #NIMH #ResearchFundingPolicy #OpenScience #DisparitiesResearch #OpenAccess #PublicCommentDeadline

  4. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    #Archaeological #fieldwork at #Chengcun spotlights how seasonal workers move between tea fields and excavation trenches, underlining the important role of locally recruited labor.

    🛋️ Read the blog and #openaccess article for SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social.

    🔗 cup.org/4akpvWU

    #archaeology

  5. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    #Archaeological #fieldwork at #Chengcun spotlights how seasonal workers move between tea fields and excavation trenches, underlining the important role of locally recruited labor.

    🛋️ Read the blog and #openaccess article for SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social.

    🔗 cup.org/4akpvWU

    #archaeology

  6. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    #Archaeological #fieldwork at #Chengcun spotlights how seasonal workers move between tea fields and excavation trenches, underlining the important role of locally recruited labor.

    🛋️ Read the blog and #openaccess article for SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social.

    🔗 cup.org/4akpvWU

    #archaeology

  7. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    #Archaeological #fieldwork at #Chengcun spotlights how seasonal workers move between tea fields and excavation trenches, underlining the important role of locally recruited labor.

    🛋️ Read the blog and #openaccess article for SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social.

    🔗 cup.org/4akpvWU

    #archaeology

  8. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    #Archaeological #fieldwork at #Chengcun spotlights how seasonal workers move between tea fields and excavation trenches, underlining the important role of locally recruited labor.

    🛋️ Read the blog and #openaccess article for SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social.

    🔗 cup.org/4akpvWU

    #archaeology

  9. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    🆕 New #openaccess research in the #SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social highlights a growing digital curation crisis in #archaeology. Read the blog and associated article!

    🔗 cup.org/4uRYbGY

    #digitalhumanities #datapreservation

  10. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    🆕 New #openaccess research in the #SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social highlights a growing digital curation crisis in #archaeology. Read the blog and associated article!

    🔗 cup.org/4uRYbGY

    #digitalhumanities #datapreservation

  11. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    🆕 New #openaccess research in the #SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social highlights a growing digital curation crisis in #archaeology. Read the blog and associated article!

    🔗 cup.org/4uRYbGY

    #digitalhumanities #datapreservation

  12. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    🆕 New #openaccess research in the #SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social highlights a growing digital curation crisis in #archaeology. Read the blog and associated article!

    🔗 cup.org/4uRYbGY

    #digitalhumanities #datapreservation

  13. Reposting from Cambridge University Press-Archaeology:
    🆕 New #openaccess research in the #SAA journal @saa-aap.bsky.social highlights a growing digital curation crisis in #archaeology. Read the blog and associated article!

    🔗 cup.org/4uRYbGY

    #digitalhumanities #datapreservation

  14. eLife complies with all major funding agency requirements for #OpenAccess:

    ✅ Openly available at the point of publication
    ✅ CC-BY or CC0 licences
    ✅ Deposited to Pubmed Central and other repositories
    ✅ Published with funding info

    Our policies: elife-rp.msubmit.net/html/elif

  15. eLife complies with all major funding agency requirements for #OpenAccess:

    ✅ Openly available at the point of publication
    ✅ CC-BY or CC0 licences
    ✅ Deposited to Pubmed Central and other repositories
    ✅ Published with funding info

    Our policies: elife-rp.msubmit.net/html/elif

  16. eLife complies with all major funding agency requirements for #OpenAccess:

    ✅ Openly available at the point of publication
    ✅ CC-BY or CC0 licences
    ✅ Deposited to Pubmed Central and other repositories
    ✅ Published with funding info

    Our policies: elife-rp.msubmit.net/html/elif

  17. eLife complies with all major funding agency requirements for #OpenAccess:

    ✅ Openly available at the point of publication
    ✅ CC-BY or CC0 licences
    ✅ Deposited to Pubmed Central and other repositories
    ✅ Published with funding info

    Our policies: elife-rp.msubmit.net/html/elif

  18. eLife complies with all major funding agency requirements for #OpenAccess:

    ✅ Openly available at the point of publication
    ✅ CC-BY or CC0 licences
    ✅ Deposited to Pubmed Central and other repositories
    ✅ Published with funding info

    Our policies: elife-rp.msubmit.net/html/elif

  19. Building on our OA 101 events, we're excited to announce a new webcast series, Collections & Open Access: Resourcing Open Scholarship. We will take a deep dive into topics at the intersection of library collections and #OpenAccess. The series kicks off July 22! sparcopen-org.zoom.us/webinar/

  20. Building on our OA 101 events, we're excited to announce a new webcast series, Collections & Open Access: Resourcing Open Scholarship. We will take a deep dive into topics at the intersection of library collections and #OpenAccess. The series kicks off July 22! sparcopen-org.zoom.us/webinar/

  21. Building on our OA 101 events, we're excited to announce a new webcast series, Collections & Open Access: Resourcing Open Scholarship. We will take a deep dive into topics at the intersection of library collections and #OpenAccess. The series kicks off July 22! sparcopen-org.zoom.us/webinar/

  22. Building on our OA 101 events, we're excited to announce a new webcast series, Collections & Open Access: Resourcing Open Scholarship. We will take a deep dive into topics at the intersection of library collections and #OpenAccess. The series kicks off July 22! sparcopen-org.zoom.us/webinar/

  23. Building on our OA 101 events, we're excited to announce a new webcast series, Collections & Open Access: Resourcing Open Scholarship. We will take a deep dive into topics at the intersection of library collections and #OpenAccess. The series kicks off July 22! sparcopen-org.zoom.us/webinar/

  24. Certain voices have long dominated #Psychology. #JPsyExp changes this by amplifying underrepresented scholars and their innovative work.

    We foster inclusive research that broadens human understanding.

    Submit: jpsyexp.org/submit/

    #OpenAccess #Research #Publishing

  25. Certain voices have long dominated #Psychology. #JPsyExp changes this by amplifying underrepresented scholars and their innovative work.

    We foster inclusive research that broadens human understanding.

    Submit: jpsyexp.org/submit/

    #OpenAccess #Research #Publishing

  26. Certain voices have long dominated #Psychology. #JPsyExp changes this by amplifying underrepresented scholars and their innovative work.

    We foster inclusive research that broadens human understanding.

    Submit: jpsyexp.org/submit/

    #OpenAccess #Research #Publishing

  27. Certain voices have long dominated #Psychology. #JPsyExp changes this by amplifying underrepresented scholars and their innovative work.

    We foster inclusive research that broadens human understanding.

    Submit: jpsyexp.org/submit/

    #OpenAccess #Research #Publishing

  28. Certain voices have long dominated #Psychology. #JPsyExp changes this by amplifying underrepresented scholars and their innovative work.

    We foster inclusive research that broadens human understanding.

    Submit: jpsyexp.org/submit/

    #OpenAccess #Research #Publishing

  29. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Victorian Poetry
    63.2, Summer 2025

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/2p96vazn

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Emma Davenport
    Monica David
    James Quinnell
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger
    Benjamin D. O'Dell

  30. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Victorian Poetry
    63.2, Summer 2025

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/2p96vazn

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Emma Davenport
    Monica David
    James Quinnell
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger
    Benjamin D. O'Dell

  31. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Victorian Poetry
    63.2, Summer 2025

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/2p96vazn

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Emma Davenport
    Monica David
    James Quinnell
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger
    Benjamin D. O'Dell

  32. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Victorian Poetry
    63.2, Summer 2025

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/2p96vazn

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Emma Davenport
    Monica David
    James Quinnell
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger
    Benjamin D. O'Dell

  33. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Victorian Poetry
    63.2, Summer 2025

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/2p96vazn

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Emma Davenport
    Monica David
    James Quinnell
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger
    Benjamin D. O'Dell

  34. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Journal of the History of Philosophy
    64.3, July 2026

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/ndpan52e

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Nevim Borçin
    Can Laurens Löwe
    Niccolò Fioravanti
    Manuel Fasko
    Peter West
    James J. Dicenso
    Margaret Atherton
    Tad M. Schmaltz
    Steven Nadler
    Margaret R. Hampson
    Roy C. Lee
    Alfonso Quartucci
    Kristin Primus
    Domenica Romagni
    Christian Henkel
    Heikki Haara
    Andrew Stephenson
    Edgar Maraguat
    Peter Cheyne
    Nicholas Stang
    Maria Alvarez

  35. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Journal of the History of Philosophy
    64.3, July 2026

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/ndpan52e

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Nevim Borçin
    Can Laurens Löwe
    Niccolò Fioravanti
    Manuel Fasko
    Peter West
    James J. Dicenso
    Margaret Atherton
    Tad M. Schmaltz
    Steven Nadler
    Margaret R. Hampson
    Roy C. Lee
    Alfonso Quartucci
    Kristin Primus
    Domenica Romagni
    Christian Henkel
    Heikki Haara
    Andrew Stephenson
    Edgar Maraguat
    Peter Cheyne
    Nicholas Stang
    Maria Alvarez

  36. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Journal of the History of Philosophy
    64.3, July 2026

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/ndpan52e

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Nevim Borçin
    Can Laurens Löwe
    Niccolò Fioravanti
    Manuel Fasko
    Peter West
    James J. Dicenso
    Margaret Atherton
    Tad M. Schmaltz
    Steven Nadler
    Margaret R. Hampson
    Roy C. Lee
    Alfonso Quartucci
    Kristin Primus
    Domenica Romagni
    Christian Henkel
    Heikki Haara
    Andrew Stephenson
    Edgar Maraguat
    Peter Cheyne
    Nicholas Stang
    Maria Alvarez

  37. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Journal of the History of Philosophy
    64.3, July 2026

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/ndpan52e

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Nevim Borçin
    Can Laurens Löwe
    Niccolò Fioravanti
    Manuel Fasko
    Peter West
    James J. Dicenso
    Margaret Atherton
    Tad M. Schmaltz
    Steven Nadler
    Margaret R. Hampson
    Roy C. Lee
    Alfonso Quartucci
    Kristin Primus
    Domenica Romagni
    Christian Henkel
    Heikki Haara
    Andrew Stephenson
    Edgar Maraguat
    Peter Cheyne
    Nicholas Stang
    Maria Alvarez

  38. NEW ISSUE OUT NOW
    Journal of the History of Philosophy
    64.3, July 2026

    #S2O #OpenAccess @ Project MUSE
    tiny.one/ndpan52e

    CONTRIBUTORS
    Nevim Borçin
    Can Laurens Löwe
    Niccolò Fioravanti
    Manuel Fasko
    Peter West
    James J. Dicenso
    Margaret Atherton
    Tad M. Schmaltz
    Steven Nadler
    Margaret R. Hampson
    Roy C. Lee
    Alfonso Quartucci
    Kristin Primus
    Domenica Romagni
    Christian Henkel
    Heikki Haara
    Andrew Stephenson
    Edgar Maraguat
    Peter Cheyne
    Nicholas Stang
    Maria Alvarez

  39. Right-wing surge sparks debate about partisanship's effect. My #OpenAccess study finds AfD support diminishes trust in the Federal Constitutional Court. #Democracy #AfD #PoliticalScience 🌐
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

  40. Right-wing surge sparks debate about partisanship's effect. My #OpenAccess study finds AfD support diminishes trust in the Federal Constitutional Court. #Democracy #AfD #PoliticalScience 🌐
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

  41. Right-wing surge sparks debate about partisanship's effect. My #OpenAccess study finds AfD support diminishes trust in the Federal Constitutional Court. #Democracy #AfD #PoliticalScience 🌐
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

  42. Right-wing surge sparks debate about partisanship's effect. My #OpenAccess study finds AfD support diminishes trust in the Federal Constitutional Court. #Democracy #AfD #PoliticalScience 🌐
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

  43. Right-wing surge sparks debate about partisanship's effect. My #OpenAccess study finds AfD support diminishes trust in the Federal Constitutional Court. #Democracy #AfD #PoliticalScience 🌐
    journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

  44. Alocasia odora's #microclimatic heterogeneity guides Colocasiomyia fly movement within its inflorescence-an example of thermogenesis-derived spatiotemporal microclimates guiding #pollinator movement.
    Read it for🆓!
    doi.org/10.1111/jipb.70318
    @WileyLifeSci
    #OpenAccess #JIPB #PlantSci #botany #OpenAccess

  45. Alocasia odora's #microclimatic heterogeneity guides Colocasiomyia fly movement within its inflorescence-an example of thermogenesis-derived spatiotemporal microclimates guiding #pollinator movement.
    Read it for🆓!
    doi.org/10.1111/jipb.70318
    @WileyLifeSci
    #OpenAccess #JIPB #PlantSci #botany #OpenAccess

  46. New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics

    A hydrodynamic theory for non-equilibrium full counting statistics in one-dimensional quantum systems

    Dávid X. Horváth, Benjamin Doyon, Paola Ruggiero
    SciPost Phys. 21, 007 (2026)
    scipost.org/SciPostPhys.21.1.0

    #KCL
    #UKRI

  47. New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics

    A hydrodynamic theory for non-equilibrium full counting statistics in one-dimensional quantum systems

    Dávid X. Horváth, Benjamin Doyon, Paola Ruggiero
    SciPost Phys. 21, 007 (2026)
    scipost.org/SciPostPhys.21.1.0

    #KCL
    #UKRI

  48. New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics

    A hydrodynamic theory for non-equilibrium full counting statistics in one-dimensional quantum systems

    Dávid X. Horváth, Benjamin Doyon, Paola Ruggiero
    SciPost Phys. 21, 007 (2026)
    scipost.org/SciPostPhys.21.1.0

    #KCL
    #UKRI

  49. New #openaccess publication #SciPost #Physics

    A hydrodynamic theory for non-equilibrium full counting statistics in one-dimensional quantum systems

    Dávid X. Horváth, Benjamin Doyon, Paola Ruggiero
    SciPost Phys. 21, 007 (2026)
    scipost.org/SciPostPhys.21.1.0

    #KCL
    #UKRI