home.social

#flawed — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #flawed, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. An international expert specializing in wildfire management has sharply criticized the firefighting strategy employed during the fires in the Müritz National Pa... news.osna.fm/?p=56226 | #news #cites #expert #firefighting #flawed

  2. An international expert specializing in wildfire management has sharply criticized the firefighting strategy employed during the fires in the Müritz National Pa... news.osna.fm/?p=56226 | #news #cites #expert #firefighting #flawed

  3. An international expert specializing in wildfire management has sharply criticized the firefighting strategy employed during the fires in the Müritz National Pa... news.osna.fm/?p=56226 | #news #cites #expert #firefighting #flawed

  4. Josef Hecken, the chairman of the Joint Federal Committee (GBA)-which represents health insurance funds, hospitals, and doctors-has sharply criticized the gover... news.osna.fm/?p=51954 | #news #authority #chief #financing #flawed

  5. Josef Hecken, the chairman of the Joint Federal Committee (GBA)-which represents health insurance funds, hospitals, and doctors-has sharply criticized the gover... news.osna.fm/?p=51954 | #news #authority #chief #financing #flawed

  6. Josef Hecken, the chairman of the Joint Federal Committee (GBA)-which represents health insurance funds, hospitals, and doctors-has sharply criticized the gover... news.osna.fm/?p=51954 | #news #authority #chief #financing #flawed

  7. @electrek Every car can exceed the posted speed limit—ultimately, a vehicle is just a tool. The responsibility for safe operation always lies entirely with the human driver, regardless of the current speed. Furthermore, who exactly guarantees that the map data used to dictate these limits is 100% accurate? Even tech giants like Google and Waze fail to achieve perfect, real-time accuracy. A rigid software lock based on #flawed data is completely detached from reality. #Tesla #FSD #Autopilot #EV

  8. @electrek Every car can exceed the posted speed limit—ultimately, a vehicle is just a tool. The responsibility for safe operation always lies entirely with the human driver, regardless of the current speed. Furthermore, who exactly guarantees that the map data used to dictate these limits is 100% accurate? Even tech giants like Google and Waze fail to achieve perfect, real-time accuracy. A rigid software lock based on #flawed data is completely detached from reality. #Tesla #FSD #Autopilot #EV

  9. @electrek Every car can exceed the posted speed limit—ultimately, a vehicle is just a tool. The responsibility for safe operation always lies entirely with the human driver, regardless of the current speed. Furthermore, who exactly guarantees that the map data used to dictate these limits is 100% accurate? Even tech giants like Google and Waze fail to achieve perfect, real-time accuracy. A rigid software lock based on #flawed data is completely detached from reality. #Tesla #FSD #Autopilot #EV

  10. @electrek Every car can exceed the posted speed limit—ultimately, a vehicle is just a tool. The responsibility for safe operation always lies entirely with the human driver, regardless of the current speed. Furthermore, who exactly guarantees that the map data used to dictate these limits is 100% accurate? Even tech giants like Google and Waze fail to achieve perfect, real-time accuracy. A rigid software lock based on #flawed data is completely detached from reality. #Tesla #FSD #Autopilot #EV

  11. @electrek Every car can exceed the posted speed limit—ultimately, a vehicle is just a tool. The responsibility for safe operation always lies entirely with the human driver, regardless of the current speed. Furthermore, who exactly guarantees that the map data used to dictate these limits is 100% accurate? Even tech giants like Google and Waze fail to achieve perfect, real-time accuracy. A rigid software lock based on #flawed data is completely detached from reality. #Tesla #FSD #Autopilot #EV

  12. ZERO FUCKS LEFT TO GIVE HUNTER...
    👌
    IS MY FAVE HUNTER...
    😎
    LIVE YOUR BEST LIFE, HUNTER BIDEN...
    👍
    IT'S KILLING THEM.
    😵
    #HunterBiden
    #Flawed
    #Fab
    #FU
    🖕

  13. “A prominent #Danish pension fund that previously made waves by dumping US Treasuries has reportedly announced that it will boycott the upcoming Initial Public Offering (IPO) of #SpaceX, citing severe #overvaluation and a deeply #flawed corporate #governance model.”
    europesays.com/3028925/

  14. “A prominent #Danish pension fund that previously made waves by dumping US Treasuries has reportedly announced that it will boycott the upcoming Initial Public Offering (IPO) of #SpaceX, citing severe #overvaluation and a deeply #flawed corporate #governance model.”
    europesays.com/3028925/

  15. “A prominent #Danish pension fund that previously made waves by dumping US Treasuries has reportedly announced that it will boycott the upcoming Initial Public Offering (IPO) of #SpaceX, citing severe #overvaluation and a deeply #flawed corporate #governance model.”
    europesays.com/3028925/

  16. “A prominent #Danish pension fund that previously made waves by dumping US Treasuries has reportedly announced that it will boycott the upcoming Initial Public Offering (IPO) of #SpaceX, citing severe #overvaluation and a deeply #flawed corporate #governance model.”
    europesays.com/3028925/

  17. “A prominent #Danish pension fund that previously made waves by dumping US Treasuries has reportedly announced that it will boycott the upcoming Initial Public Offering (IPO) of #SpaceX, citing severe #overvaluation and a deeply #flawed corporate #governance model.”
    europesays.com/3028925/

  18. More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

  19. More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

  20. More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

  21. More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

  22. And sometimes I have to swat flies. #Religion is #practiced by those that #know it. So your #criticism is absolutely #flawed. Your #analysis is of a #hater and #troll. One more comment out of this #account and you're gone. You don't say things other people ever need to say. So sorry for you.

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6uzvzlb5wl6jwl3im2yzxvgv/post/3mfwkw7wse22i

  23. And sometimes I have to swat flies. #Religion is #practiced by those that #know it. So your #criticism is absolutely #flawed. Your #analysis is of a #hater and #troll. One more comment out of this #account and you're gone. You don't say things other people ever need to say. So sorry for you.

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6uzvzlb5wl6jwl3im2yzxvgv/post/3mfwkw7wse22i

  24. #Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-ag #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

  25. #Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-ag #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

  26. #Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-ag #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

  27. #Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-ag #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

  28. #Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-ag #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

  29. Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

    Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

    What this post is (and isn’t)

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

    This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

    1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

    • Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
    • Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
    • Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
    • Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

    2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

    The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

    • Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
    • Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
    • Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
    • Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
    • Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
    • Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
    • Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

    Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

    3) Who the experts are

    The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

    4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

    Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
    File:

    DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025Download

    Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
    File:

    Climate_Experts_Review_of_DOE_CWG_ReportDownload

    Download: Author Bios (PDF)
    File:

    Author BiographiesDownload

    Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

    #2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

  30. Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

    Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

    What this post is (and isn’t)

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

    This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

    1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

    • Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
    • Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
    • Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
    • Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

    2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

    The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

    • Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
    • Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
    • Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
    • Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
    • Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
    • Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
    • Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

    Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

    3) Who the experts are

    The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

    4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

    Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
    File:

    DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025Download

    Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
    File:

    Climate_Experts_Review_of_DOE_CWG_ReportDownload

    Download: Author Bios (PDF)
    File:

    Author BiographiesDownload

    Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

    #2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

  31. Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

    Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

    What this post is (and isn’t)

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

    This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

    1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

    • Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
    • Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
    • Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
    • Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

    2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

    The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

    • Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
    • Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
    • Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
    • Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
    • Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
    • Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
    • Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

    Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

    3) Who the experts are

    The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

    4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

    Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
    File:

    DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025Download

    Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
    File:

    Climate_Experts_Review_of_DOE_CWG_ReportDownload

    Download: Author Bios (PDF)
    File:

    Author BiographiesDownload

    Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

    #2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

  32. Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

    Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

    What this post is (and isn’t)

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

    This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

    1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

    • Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
    • Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
    • Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
    • Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

    2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

    The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

    • Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
    • Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
    • Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
    • Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
    • Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
    • Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
    • Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

    Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

    3) Who the experts are

    The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

    4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

    Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
    File:

    DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025Download

    Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
    File:

    Climate_Experts_Review_of_DOE_CWG_ReportDownload

    Download: Author Bios (PDF)
    File:

    Author BiographiesDownload

    Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

    #2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

  33. Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

    Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

    What this post is (and isn’t)

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

    This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

    1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

    • Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
    • Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
    • Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
    • Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

    2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

    The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

    • Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
    • Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
    • Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
    • Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
    • Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
    • Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
    • Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

    Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

    3) Who the experts are

    The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

    4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

    Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
    File:

    DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025Download

    Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
    File:

    Climate_Experts_Review_of_DOE_CWG_ReportDownload

    Download: Author Bios (PDF)
    File:

    Author BiographiesDownload

    Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

    #2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

  34. 🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
    wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~vo #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

  35. 🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
    wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~vo #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

  36. 🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
    wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~vo #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

  37. 🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
    wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~vo #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

  38. Wednesday, April 30, 2025

    Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  39. Wednesday, April 30, 2025

    Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  40. Wednesday, April 30, 2025

    Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  41. Wednesday, April 30, 2025

    Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  42. As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
    "an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
    apnews.com/article/israel-pale

  43. As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
    "an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
    apnews.com/article/israel-pale

  44. As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
    "an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
    apnews.com/article/israel-pale

  45. As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
    "an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
    apnews.com/article/israel-pale

  46. We can't impress upon a young person his or her responsibility to make these choices,

    if we refuse to respect his or her right to make those choices.

    That is the basic flaw in our approach.

    #responsibility #choices #respect #right #flawed #approach