#flawed — Public Fediverse posts

we are all wildly

we are all wildly 
flawed, irises pretending to 
be the exemption
.
20260521:2243
y

Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners

Rob Fitzpatrick died …
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Mentalhealth #according #allegedly #beaten #cellmate #Cells #Death #decisions #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #herald #ill #Mental #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #poor #preceded #Prison #Prisoners #report #resourcing #shared #specialist #systems #team #whangrei
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/539384/

Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners

Rob Fitzpatrick died …
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Mentalhealth #according #allegedly #beaten #cellmate #Cells #Death #decisions #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #herald #ill #Mental #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #poor #preceded #Prison #Prisoners #report #resourcing #shared #specialist #systems #team #whangrei
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/539384/

Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners

Rob Fitzpatrick died at Auckland’s Mt Eden Correctio…
#NewsBeep #News #Mentalhealth #according #allegedly #AU #Australia #beaten #cellmate #cells #death #decisions #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #herald #ill #mental #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #poor #preceded #Prison #Prisoners #Report #resourcing #shared #specialist #Systems #team #whangrei
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/557594/

Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners

Rob Fitzpatrick died at Auckland’s Mt Eden Correctio…
#NewsBeep #News #Mentalhealth #according #allegedly #AU #Australia #beaten #cellmate #cells #death #decisions #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #herald #ill #mental #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #poor #preceded #Prison #Prisoners #Report #resourcing #shared #specialist #Systems #team #whangrei
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/557594/

https://www.europesays.com/ie/398573/ Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners #according #allegedly #beaten #cellmate #cells #death #decisions #Éire #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #herald #IE #ill #Ireland #mental #MentalHealth #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #Poor #preceded #Prison #Prisoners #report #resourcing #shared #specialist #Systems #Team #whangrei

https://www.europesays.com/uk/843309/ Specialist mental health team excluded from decisions on shared prison cells for mentally ill prisoners #According #allegedly #beaten #cellmate #cells #Death #decisions #excluded #flawed #for #from #Health #Herald #ill #mental #MentalHealth #mentally #obtained #on #poor #preceded #prison #prisoners #report #resourcing #shared #specialist #systems #team #UK #UnitedKingdom #whangrei

More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... https://news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... https://news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... https://news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

More than 1,300 pages of internal Ministry of the Interior documents show that the government's practice of refusing asylum‑seekers at the borders is almost unt... https://news.osna.fm/?p=39021 | #news #asylumrefusal #flawed #german #legally

And sometimes I have to swat flies. #Religion is #practiced by those that #know it. So your #criticism is absolutely #flawed. Your #analysis is of a #hater and #troll. One more comment out of this #account and you're gone. You don't say things other people ever need to say. So sorry for you.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6uzvzlb5wl6jwl3im2yzxvgv/post/3mfwkw7wse22i

And sometimes I have to swat flies. #Religion is #practiced by those that #know it. So your #criticism is absolutely #flawed. Your #analysis is of a #hater and #troll. One more comment out of this #account and you're gone. You don't say things other people ever need to say. So sorry for you.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6uzvzlb5wl6jwl3im2yzxvgv/post/3mfwkw7wse22i

#Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. https://www.engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-age-verification-system-is-reportedly-a-trainwreck-220320016.html?Metaver.se #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

#Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. https://www.engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-age-verification-system-is-reportedly-a-trainwreck-220320016.html?Metaver.se #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

#Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. https://www.engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-age-verification-system-is-reportedly-a-trainwreck-220320016.html?Metaver.se #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

#Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. https://www.engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-age-verification-system-is-reportedly-a-trainwreck-220320016.html?Metaver.se #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

#Roblox’s #ageverification system, implemented to address child predator concerns, is reportedly #flawed. The system is #misclassifying users’ ages, leading to adults being grouped with children and vice versa. This has caused frustration among developers and a significant drop in chat usage. https://www.engadget.com/gaming/robloxs-age-verification-system-is-reportedly-a-trainwreck-220320016.html?Metaver.se #Metaverse #VirtualWorlds #XR #VR #MR #AR #BeyondPictures

#Academic #journal #publishing urgently needs #reform. Why? The system is #ethically #flawed. The Journal of Scholarly Publishing explains: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047.

#Academic #journal #publishing urgently needs #reform. Why? The system is #ethically #flawed. The Journal of Scholarly Publishing explains: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047.

#Academic #journal #publishing urgently needs #reform. Why? The system is #ethically #flawed. The Journal of Scholarly Publishing explains: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047.

#Academic #journal #publishing urgently needs #reform. Why? The system is #ethically #flawed. The Journal of Scholarly Publishing explains: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047.

#Academic #journal #publishing urgently needs #reform. Why? The system is #ethically #flawed. The Journal of Scholarly Publishing explains: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047.

Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

What this post is (and isn’t)

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

• Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
• Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
• Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
• Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

• Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
• Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
• Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
• Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
• Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
• Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
• Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

3) Who the experts are

The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Author Bios (PDF)
File:

Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

#2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

What this post is (and isn’t)

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

• Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
• Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
• Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
• Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

• Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
• Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
• Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
• Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
• Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
• Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
• Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

3) Who the experts are

The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Author Bios (PDF)
File:

Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

#2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

What this post is (and isn’t)

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

• Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
• Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
• Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
• Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

• Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
• Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
• Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
• Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
• Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
• Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
• Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

3) Who the experts are

The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Author Bios (PDF)
File:

Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

#2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

What this post is (and isn’t)

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

• Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
• Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
• Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
• Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

• Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
• Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
• Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
• Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
• Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
• Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
• Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

3) Who the experts are

The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Author Bios (PDF)
File:

Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

#2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

Climate Debate – DOE CWG & Experts’ Review – Special Review…

Jump to: Major flaws (at-a-glance) • Section notes • Who the experts are • Download the reports

What this post is (and isn’t)

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Climate Working Group (CWG) released a 151-page report. In response, 85+ climate experts assembled a comprehensive ~434–439-page review that critiques the CWG report’s methods, sourcing, and conclusions.

This page curates the primary source materials — the DOE report, the experts’ review, and the author bios — and highlights how to read them. It’s designed so you can dig into the originals yourself, or share them with others.

1) Major flaws flagged by the Experts’ Review (at-a-glance)

• Evidence handling: points to pervasive cherry-picking, selective citation, and missing statistics in the CWG report.
• Process/quality: argues the CWG product lacks the transparent, independent peer review standards used for highly influential assessments (e.g., IPCC/NCA).
• Scope/expertise: contends a very small author team wrote far outside their specialties, leading to errors and omissions the review catalogs.
• Key topic gaps: underestimation/misframing across heat, extreme precipitation, drought, hurricanes, wildfires, sea-level rise, agriculture, health, and economic risk.

2) Section notes: what’s inside the Experts’ Review

The review is organized as 48 focused comments, each written by topic specialists. Here are quick “signposts” so readers can jump to what they need:

• Climate sensitivity & models (how sensitive the system is; near-term vs long-term metrics).
• Observations: surface/tropospheric warming, vertical profiles, stratospheric cooling, snow cover, albedo.
• Extreme events: temperature extremes, heavy precipitation, hurricanes & TCs, tornadoes, flooding, drought, wildfires.
• Sea-level rise: observed acceleration, coastal flooding, 2050 outlook.
• Attribution & variability: methods, oceans, solar variability, time-series methods.
• Impacts & risk: agriculture, billion-dollar disasters, temperature-related mortality, economy & social cost of carbon.
• Omissions called out: wildlife & biodiversity impacts.

Each comment cites the literature and calls out specific issues or claims to check in the CWG report. Tip: Skim the Table of Contents at the front of the PDF to hop directly to any topic.

3) Who the experts are

The review was co-edited by Andrew E. Dessler (Texas A&M) and Robert E. Kopp (Rutgers), and assembled contributions from more than 85 climate scientists across career stages and institutions in the U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada. A separate Biographical Sketches file provides credentials and affiliations for transparency.

4) Download the Reports (Primary Sources)

Download: DOE CWG Report (151 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Climate Experts’ Review (~434–459 pp., PDF)
File:

Download: Author Bios (PDF)
File:

Last updated: September 3, 2025. Prepared by: ChatGPT 5, and Your Editor, DrWeb.

#2025 #ACriticalReviewOfImpactsOfGreenhouseGasEmissionsOnTheUSClimate #America #ClimateChange #DepartmentOfEnergy #DocketIDNoDOEHQ20250207 #DonaldTrump #Education #ExpertReview #Flawed #Health #History #Libraries #Library #NASA #Opinion #Politics #Reading #Resistance #Science #Technology #Trump #TrumpAdministration #UnitedStates

AJLT Director Michael Patrick King Defends Carrie Bradshaw Flaws Post-Finale

#AndJustLikeThat #CarrieBradshaw #CreativeDirector #defense #flawed
https://blazetrends.com/ajlt-director-michael-patrick-king-defends-carrie-bradshaw-flaws-post-finale/?fsp_sid=94820

Is There Any Fixing The New York Yankees? https://www.rawchili.com/4400157/ #AaronBoone #AaronJudge #AnthonyVolpe #awful #baddog #BaddogRant #BaddogYankees #Baseball #BrianCashman #CCSabathia #CodyBellinger #DerekJeter #Dodgers #FanReaction #flawed #LosingStreak #MaxFried #MLB #NewYork #NewYorkYankees #NewYorkYankees #NyYankees #PaulGoldschmidt #rage #Rant #TalkinYanks #WorldSeries #YankeeFanRant #Yankees #YankeesFanReaction #YankeesHighlights #YankeesNews #YankeesReaction

Is There Any Fixing The New York Yankees? https://www.rawchili.com/4400157/ #AaronBoone #AaronJudge #AnthonyVolpe #awful #baddog #BaddogRant #BaddogYankees #Baseball #BrianCashman #CCSabathia #CodyBellinger #DerekJeter #Dodgers #FanReaction #flawed #LosingStreak #MaxFried #MLB #NewYork #NewYorkYankees #NewYorkYankees #NyYankees #PaulGoldschmidt #rage #Rant #TalkinYanks #WorldSeries #YankeeFanRant #Yankees #YankeesFanReaction #YankeesHighlights #YankeesNews #YankeesReaction

🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~volker/arepo/ #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~volker/arepo/ #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~volker/arepo/ #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

🤔 Oh, the audacity! 67 pages and 50 figures to tell us that the old #methods of simulating the #universe are, gasp, #flawed. 🚀📉 Here's a *new* scheme, because clearly, the cosmos was just waiting for a #moving #mesh to finally make sense. 🙄
https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~volker/arepo/ #audacity #simulation #new #HackerNews #ngated

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

https://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025/04/wednesday-april-30-2025/

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

https://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025/04/wednesday-april-30-2025/

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

https://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025/04/wednesday-april-30-2025/

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Journalist Roshchyna’s body missing organs after Russian captivity; brain, eyes, & part of the trachea had been removed — [vlog/video] Expert on US’ declining disinformation defense; Who’s countering Russian propaganda now? — France calls UN Security Council meeting over Russian attacks on civilians in Ukraine — Russian drone attack injures at least 38 civilians in Kharkiv’s high-rise apartment blocks, homes … and more

https://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025/04/wednesday-april-30-2025/

As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
"an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-ai-technology-737bc17af7b03e98c29cec4e15d0f108

As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
"an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-ai-technology-737bc17af7b03e98c29cec4e15d0f108

As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
"an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-ai-technology-737bc17af7b03e98c29cec4e15d0f108

As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
"an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-ai-technology-737bc17af7b03e98c29cec4e15d0f108

As #Israel uses #US-made #AI models in #war, concerns arise about tech’s role in who lives & who dies
"an #AP #investigation revealed new details of how #AIsystems select targets & ways they can go wrong, incl'g faulty data or #flawed #algorithms.. based on internal docs, data & exclusive interviews w curr & fmr #Israeli #officials & co employees.. is the 1st confirmation tt #commercialAI models r directly used in #warfare.. enabling tis type of unethical & #unlawful war”
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-ai-technology-737bc17af7b03e98c29cec4e15d0f108

We can't impress upon a young person his or her responsibility to make these choices,

if we refuse to respect his or her right to make those choices.

That is the basic flaw in our approach.

#responsibility #choices #respect #right #flawed #approach

New entry of AI-generated #comics and #jokes added to our #website:

#Flawed Pay #Package

comics.lucentinian.com/1805
#VisitUsNow #Comedy #AIComedy #Laughs #AILaughs

New entry of AI-generated #comics and #jokes added to our #website:

#Flawed Pay #Package

comics.lucentinian.com/1805
#VisitUsNow #Comedy #AIComedy #Laughs #AILaughs

New entry of AI-generated #comics and #jokes added to our #website:

#Flawed Pay #Package

comics.lucentinian.com/1805
#VisitUsNow #Comedy #AIComedy #Laughs #AILaughs

New entry of AI-generated #comics and #jokes added to our #website:

#Flawed Pay #Package

comics.lucentinian.com/1805
#VisitUsNow #Comedy #AIComedy #Laughs #AILaughs

#science and #democracy have (at least) one thing in common: They take into account that #humans are #flawed and put #policies and #protocols in place to minimise the #damage such flaws (#greed, #bias, #stupidity, #corruption, #narcissism, #ego, #burnout, #ignorance etc.) can do.