#dataaccess — Public Fediverse posts

Met Police Surveillance Exposes Data Requests Surge

The Metropolitan Police made a staggering 700,000+ requests to tech companies in 2025 to access private communications data, helping officers solve crimes, find missing people, and gather crucial intelligence. This massive surge in data requests highlights the force's growing reliance on digital information to keep London safe.

https://osintsights.com/met-police-surveillance-exposes-data-requests-surge?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

#LawEnforcement #Surveillance #DataAccess #FreedomOfInformation #Ocda

Yade Sheet: A Powerful Spreadsheet Tool for Unity #Spreadsheet #Datatool #Unity #Editor #Runtime #Dataaccess #Extensible #Compatible #Thirdpartyintegrationbr #AssetStore

https://u3dn.com/packages/yade-sheet-a-powerful-spreadsheet-tool-for-unity-171399

YouTube Restricts Data Access While Claiming Openness

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 10, 2026

Reporting

Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), very large online platforms are expected to provide vetted researchers with access to data necessary to study systemic risks. YouTube has publicly stated that it supports independent research and has expanded transparency initiatives in response to EU regulation.

In practice, meaningful data access remains limited.

EU-based researchers report long approval timelines, narrow data scopes, and technical constraints that prevent robust analysis of recommendation systems, visibility controls, and monetization impacts. Access is often restricted to pre-defined datasets that exclude variables needed to test platform claims. Requests to examine how changes affect specific languages, regions, or political topics are frequently denied or deferred.

While YouTube cites privacy and security concerns, the effect is consistent: independent verification of platform behavior is difficult or impossible.

Analysis

Transparency without access is a managed narrative.

By controlling which data can be studied and how it is delivered, YouTube determines the boundaries of permissible inquiry. Researchers can confirm what the platform already acknowledges, but they cannot test claims that matter most to public oversight—how recommendations amplify content, how visibility is adjusted, and how monetization decisions shape behavior.

This posture reflects incentives established at the parent-company level. Google treats core data flows as strategic assets. Opening them to external scrutiny risks exposing design choices that contradict public assurances. Limited access preserves reputational control while allowing the company to claim cooperation.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates an asymmetry. Platforms possess comprehensive internal data. Regulators and researchers receive fragments. Oversight becomes dependent on platform-selected evidence rather than independent examination.

What Remains Unclear

YouTube does not publish clear criteria explaining which EU researchers qualify for data access, what datasets are available, or how long approvals should take. It also does not disclose how many requests are denied or narrowed, nor on what grounds.

Without these disclosures, it is impossible to assess whether data access obligations are being met in substance rather than in form.

Why This Matters

The DSA’s research access provisions were designed to reduce information asymmetry between platforms and the public. When access is constrained to safe or partial views, that asymmetry persists.

If regulators cannot rely on independent research to test platform claims, enforcement depends on self-reporting and after-the-fact investigation. That model has already failed to prevent repeated harm.

For EU oversight to function as intended, data access must enable scrutiny, not just symbolism. Until then, claims of openness remain unproven.

References (APA)

European Commission. (2024). Digital Services Act: Data access for vetted researchers.
European Digital Rights (EDRi). (2023). Opening the black box: Research access under the DSA.
AlgorithmWatch. (2022). Why platform data access matters for accountability.

YouTube Restricts Data Access While Claiming Openness

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 10, 2026

Reporting

Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), very large online platforms are expected to provide vetted researchers with access to data necessary to study systemic risks. YouTube has publicly stated that it supports independent research and has expanded transparency initiatives in response to EU regulation.

In practice, meaningful data access remains limited.

EU-based researchers report long approval timelines, narrow data scopes, and technical constraints that prevent robust analysis of recommendation systems, visibility controls, and monetization impacts. Access is often restricted to pre-defined datasets that exclude variables needed to test platform claims. Requests to examine how changes affect specific languages, regions, or political topics are frequently denied or deferred.

While YouTube cites privacy and security concerns, the effect is consistent: independent verification of platform behavior is difficult or impossible.

Analysis

Transparency without access is a managed narrative.

By controlling which data can be studied and how it is delivered, YouTube determines the boundaries of permissible inquiry. Researchers can confirm what the platform already acknowledges, but they cannot test claims that matter most to public oversight—how recommendations amplify content, how visibility is adjusted, and how monetization decisions shape behavior.

This posture reflects incentives established at the parent-company level. Google treats core data flows as strategic assets. Opening them to external scrutiny risks exposing design choices that contradict public assurances. Limited access preserves reputational control while allowing the company to claim cooperation.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates an asymmetry. Platforms possess comprehensive internal data. Regulators and researchers receive fragments. Oversight becomes dependent on platform-selected evidence rather than independent examination.

What Remains Unclear

YouTube does not publish clear criteria explaining which EU researchers qualify for data access, what datasets are available, or how long approvals should take. It also does not disclose how many requests are denied or narrowed, nor on what grounds.

Without these disclosures, it is impossible to assess whether data access obligations are being met in substance rather than in form.

Why This Matters

The DSA’s research access provisions were designed to reduce information asymmetry between platforms and the public. When access is constrained to safe or partial views, that asymmetry persists.

If regulators cannot rely on independent research to test platform claims, enforcement depends on self-reporting and after-the-fact investigation. That model has already failed to prevent repeated harm.

For EU oversight to function as intended, data access must enable scrutiny, not just symbolism. Until then, claims of openness remain unproven.

References (APA)

European Commission. (2024). Digital Services Act: Data access for vetted researchers.
European Digital Rights (EDRi). (2023). Opening the black box: Research access under the DSA.
AlgorithmWatch. (2022). Why platform data access matters for accountability.

YouTube Restricts Data Access While Claiming Openness

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 10, 2026

Reporting

Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), very large online platforms are expected to provide vetted researchers with access to data necessary to study systemic risks. YouTube has publicly stated that it supports independent research and has expanded transparency initiatives in response to EU regulation.

In practice, meaningful data access remains limited.

EU-based researchers report long approval timelines, narrow data scopes, and technical constraints that prevent robust analysis of recommendation systems, visibility controls, and monetization impacts. Access is often restricted to pre-defined datasets that exclude variables needed to test platform claims. Requests to examine how changes affect specific languages, regions, or political topics are frequently denied or deferred.

While YouTube cites privacy and security concerns, the effect is consistent: independent verification of platform behavior is difficult or impossible.

Analysis

Transparency without access is a managed narrative.

By controlling which data can be studied and how it is delivered, YouTube determines the boundaries of permissible inquiry. Researchers can confirm what the platform already acknowledges, but they cannot test claims that matter most to public oversight—how recommendations amplify content, how visibility is adjusted, and how monetization decisions shape behavior.

This posture reflects incentives established at the parent-company level. Google treats core data flows as strategic assets. Opening them to external scrutiny risks exposing design choices that contradict public assurances. Limited access preserves reputational control while allowing the company to claim cooperation.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates an asymmetry. Platforms possess comprehensive internal data. Regulators and researchers receive fragments. Oversight becomes dependent on platform-selected evidence rather than independent examination.

What Remains Unclear

YouTube does not publish clear criteria explaining which EU researchers qualify for data access, what datasets are available, or how long approvals should take. It also does not disclose how many requests are denied or narrowed, nor on what grounds.

Without these disclosures, it is impossible to assess whether data access obligations are being met in substance rather than in form.

Why This Matters

The DSA’s research access provisions were designed to reduce information asymmetry between platforms and the public. When access is constrained to safe or partial views, that asymmetry persists.

If regulators cannot rely on independent research to test platform claims, enforcement depends on self-reporting and after-the-fact investigation. That model has already failed to prevent repeated harm.

For EU oversight to function as intended, data access must enable scrutiny, not just symbolism. Until then, claims of openness remain unproven.

References (APA)

European Commission. (2024). Digital Services Act: Data access for vetted researchers.
European Digital Rights (EDRi). (2023). Opening the black box: Research access under the DSA.
AlgorithmWatch. (2022). Why platform data access matters for accountability.

YouTube Restricts Data Access While Claiming Openness

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 10, 2026

Reporting

Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), very large online platforms are expected to provide vetted researchers with access to data necessary to study systemic risks. YouTube has publicly stated that it supports independent research and has expanded transparency initiatives in response to EU regulation.

In practice, meaningful data access remains limited.

EU-based researchers report long approval timelines, narrow data scopes, and technical constraints that prevent robust analysis of recommendation systems, visibility controls, and monetization impacts. Access is often restricted to pre-defined datasets that exclude variables needed to test platform claims. Requests to examine how changes affect specific languages, regions, or political topics are frequently denied or deferred.

While YouTube cites privacy and security concerns, the effect is consistent: independent verification of platform behavior is difficult or impossible.

Analysis

Transparency without access is a managed narrative.

By controlling which data can be studied and how it is delivered, YouTube determines the boundaries of permissible inquiry. Researchers can confirm what the platform already acknowledges, but they cannot test claims that matter most to public oversight—how recommendations amplify content, how visibility is adjusted, and how monetization decisions shape behavior.

This posture reflects incentives established at the parent-company level. Google treats core data flows as strategic assets. Opening them to external scrutiny risks exposing design choices that contradict public assurances. Limited access preserves reputational control while allowing the company to claim cooperation.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates an asymmetry. Platforms possess comprehensive internal data. Regulators and researchers receive fragments. Oversight becomes dependent on platform-selected evidence rather than independent examination.

What Remains Unclear

YouTube does not publish clear criteria explaining which EU researchers qualify for data access, what datasets are available, or how long approvals should take. It also does not disclose how many requests are denied or narrowed, nor on what grounds.

Without these disclosures, it is impossible to assess whether data access obligations are being met in substance rather than in form.

Why This Matters

The DSA’s research access provisions were designed to reduce information asymmetry between platforms and the public. When access is constrained to safe or partial views, that asymmetry persists.

If regulators cannot rely on independent research to test platform claims, enforcement depends on self-reporting and after-the-fact investigation. That model has already failed to prevent repeated harm.

For EU oversight to function as intended, data access must enable scrutiny, not just symbolism. Until then, claims of openness remain unproven.

References (APA)

European Commission. (2024). Digital Services Act: Data access for vetted researchers.
European Digital Rights (EDRi). (2023). Opening the black box: Research access under the DSA.
AlgorithmWatch. (2022). Why platform data access matters for accountability.

YouTube Restricts Data Access While Claiming Openness

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 10, 2026

Reporting

Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), very large online platforms are expected to provide vetted researchers with access to data necessary to study systemic risks. YouTube has publicly stated that it supports independent research and has expanded transparency initiatives in response to EU regulation.

In practice, meaningful data access remains limited.

EU-based researchers report long approval timelines, narrow data scopes, and technical constraints that prevent robust analysis of recommendation systems, visibility controls, and monetization impacts. Access is often restricted to pre-defined datasets that exclude variables needed to test platform claims. Requests to examine how changes affect specific languages, regions, or political topics are frequently denied or deferred.

While YouTube cites privacy and security concerns, the effect is consistent: independent verification of platform behavior is difficult or impossible.

Analysis

Transparency without access is a managed narrative.

By controlling which data can be studied and how it is delivered, YouTube determines the boundaries of permissible inquiry. Researchers can confirm what the platform already acknowledges, but they cannot test claims that matter most to public oversight—how recommendations amplify content, how visibility is adjusted, and how monetization decisions shape behavior.

This posture reflects incentives established at the parent-company level. Google treats core data flows as strategic assets. Opening them to external scrutiny risks exposing design choices that contradict public assurances. Limited access preserves reputational control while allowing the company to claim cooperation.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates an asymmetry. Platforms possess comprehensive internal data. Regulators and researchers receive fragments. Oversight becomes dependent on platform-selected evidence rather than independent examination.

What Remains Unclear

YouTube does not publish clear criteria explaining which EU researchers qualify for data access, what datasets are available, or how long approvals should take. It also does not disclose how many requests are denied or narrowed, nor on what grounds.

Without these disclosures, it is impossible to assess whether data access obligations are being met in substance rather than in form.

Why This Matters

The DSA’s research access provisions were designed to reduce information asymmetry between platforms and the public. When access is constrained to safe or partial views, that asymmetry persists.

If regulators cannot rely on independent research to test platform claims, enforcement depends on self-reporting and after-the-fact investigation. That model has already failed to prevent repeated harm.

For EU oversight to function as intended, data access must enable scrutiny, not just symbolism. Until then, claims of openness remain unproven.

References (APA)

European Commission. (2024). Digital Services Act: Data access for vetted researchers.
European Digital Rights (EDRi). (2023). Opening the black box: Research access under the DSA.
AlgorithmWatch. (2022). Why platform data access matters for accountability.

ICYMI: noyb files GDPR complaint over LinkedIn's paywall for profile visitor data: Privacy group noyb challenges LinkedIn for refusing to hand over profile visitor data free of charge while selling the same information through its Premium tier. https://ppc.land/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-over-linkedins-paywall-for-profile-visitor-data/ #GDPR #Privacy #DataProtection #LinkedIn #DataAccess

ICYMI: noyb files GDPR complaint over LinkedIn's paywall for profile visitor data: Privacy group noyb challenges LinkedIn for refusing to hand over profile visitor data free of charge while selling the same information through its Premium tier. https://ppc.land/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-over-linkedins-paywall-for-profile-visitor-data/ #GDPR #Privacy #DataProtection #LinkedIn #DataAccess

ICYMI: noyb files GDPR complaint over LinkedIn's paywall for profile visitor data: Privacy group noyb challenges LinkedIn for refusing to hand over profile visitor data free of charge while selling the same information through its Premium tier. https://ppc.land/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-over-linkedins-paywall-for-profile-visitor-data/ #GDPR #Privacy #DataProtection #LinkedIn #DataAccess

ICYMI: noyb files GDPR complaint over LinkedIn's paywall for profile visitor data: Privacy group noyb challenges LinkedIn for refusing to hand over profile visitor data free of charge while selling the same information through its Premium tier. https://ppc.land/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-over-linkedins-paywall-for-profile-visitor-data/ #GDPR #Privacy #DataProtection #LinkedIn #DataAccess

Oh, look! Another riveting piece on transgender homicides, hidden behind the glorious barrier of #JavaScript and #cookies 🍪🔒. Because, naturally, the data on crimes can't be accessed without first proving you're not a bot 🦾. Who knew that the key to understanding societal violence was a cookie acceptance button? 🤦‍♂️
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6182901 #transgenderhomicides #dataaccess #societalviolence #onlineprivacy #HackerNews #ngated

Oh, look! Another riveting piece on transgender homicides, hidden behind the glorious barrier of #JavaScript and #cookies 🍪🔒. Because, naturally, the data on crimes can't be accessed without first proving you're not a bot 🦾. Who knew that the key to understanding societal violence was a cookie acceptance button? 🤦‍♂️
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6182901 #transgenderhomicides #dataaccess #societalviolence #onlineprivacy #HackerNews #ngated

Oh, look! Another riveting piece on transgender homicides, hidden behind the glorious barrier of #JavaScript and #cookies 🍪🔒. Because, naturally, the data on crimes can't be accessed without first proving you're not a bot 🦾. Who knew that the key to understanding societal violence was a cookie acceptance button? 🤦‍♂️
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6182901 #transgenderhomicides #dataaccess #societalviolence #onlineprivacy #HackerNews #ngated

Oh, look! Another riveting piece on transgender homicides, hidden behind the glorious barrier of #JavaScript and #cookies 🍪🔒. Because, naturally, the data on crimes can't be accessed without first proving you're not a bot 🦾. Who knew that the key to understanding societal violence was a cookie acceptance button? 🤦‍♂️
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6182901 #transgenderhomicides #dataaccess #societalviolence #onlineprivacy #HackerNews #ngated

Oh, look! Another riveting piece on transgender homicides, hidden behind the glorious barrier of #JavaScript and #cookies 🍪🔒. Because, naturally, the data on crimes can't be accessed without first proving you're not a bot 🦾. Who knew that the key to understanding societal violence was a cookie acceptance button? 🤦‍♂️
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6182901 #transgenderhomicides #dataaccess #societalviolence #onlineprivacy #HackerNews #ngated

Google Ads cuts granular data access to 37 months starting June 2026: Google Ads cuts granular reporting to 37 months from June 2026, reversing its 11-year policy and affecting the Google Ads API, scripts, and BigQuery pipelines. https://ppc.land/google-ads-cuts-granular-data-access-to-37-months-starting-june-2026/ #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #PPC #DataAccess #BigQuery

Google Ads cuts granular data access to 37 months starting June 2026: Google Ads cuts granular reporting to 37 months from June 2026, reversing its 11-year policy and affecting the Google Ads API, scripts, and BigQuery pipelines. https://ppc.land/google-ads-cuts-granular-data-access-to-37-months-starting-june-2026/ #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #PPC #DataAccess #BigQuery

Google Ads cuts granular data access to 37 months starting June 2026: Google Ads cuts granular reporting to 37 months from June 2026, reversing its 11-year policy and affecting the Google Ads API, scripts, and BigQuery pipelines. https://ppc.land/google-ads-cuts-granular-data-access-to-37-months-starting-june-2026/ #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #PPC #DataAccess #BigQuery

Google Ads cuts granular data access to 37 months starting June 2026: Google Ads cuts granular reporting to 37 months from June 2026, reversing its 11-year policy and affecting the Google Ads API, scripts, and BigQuery pipelines. https://ppc.land/google-ads-cuts-granular-data-access-to-37-months-starting-june-2026/ #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #PPC #DataAccess #BigQuery

FYI: EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

FYI: EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

FYI: EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

FYI: EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

https://www.europesays.com/britain/18448/ Red Hat reveals an AI sovereignty gap and the open source needs #AIArmsRace #AIGovernance #AIInfrastructure #AIRegulation #AISovereignty #ArtificialIntelligence(AI) #DataAccess #DigitalGovernments #EUAIAct #RegulatoryFragmentation #UK #UKDUAA #UnitedKingdom #USCloudAct

EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

EU court's top adviser says data watchdogs must honor GDPR access requests: An EU Advocate General says data protection authorities qualify as data controllers under GDPR and cannot block subject access requests under national law. https://ppc.land/eu-courts-top-adviser-says-data-watchdogs-must-honor-gdpr-access-requests/ #GDPR #DataProtection #PrivacyRights #DataAccess #EURegulations

DOGE employee stole Social Security data and put it on a thumb drive, report says | TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/doge-employee-stole-social-security-data-and-put-it-on-a-thumb-drive-report-says/ #data #privacy #PII #stolen #Doge #cybersecurity #dataaccess #governance #readonly

DOGE employee stole Social Security data and put it on a thumb drive, report says | TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/doge-employee-stole-social-security-data-and-put-it-on-a-thumb-drive-report-says/ #data #privacy #PII #stolen #Doge #cybersecurity #dataaccess #governance #readonly

DOGE employee stole Social Security data and put it on a thumb drive, report says | TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/doge-employee-stole-social-security-data-and-put-it-on-a-thumb-drive-report-says/ #data #privacy #PII #stolen #Doge #cybersecurity #dataaccess #governance #readonly

DOGE employee stole Social Security data and put it on a thumb drive, report says | TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/10/doge-employee-stole-social-security-data-and-put-it-on-a-thumb-drive-report-says/ #data #privacy #PII #stolen #Doge #cybersecurity #dataaccess #governance #readonly

Government Retracts Controversial Data Access Powers from Border Bill Amidst Opposition

Canada's government removed controversial internet data access powers from a border bill after people spoke out. The powers will be dealt with later.

#Canada, #Privacy, #BillC2, #DataAccess, #LawEnforcement

https://newsletter.tf/canada-removes-data-access-powers-border-bill-october-2025/

Government Retracts Controversial Data Access Powers from Border Bill Amidst Opposition

Canada's government removed controversial internet data access powers from a border bill after people spoke out. The powers will be dealt with later.

#Canada, #Privacy, #BillC2, #DataAccess, #LawEnforcement

https://newsletter.tf/canada-removes-data-access-powers-border-bill-october-2025/

The Canadian government has removed rules that would have let police get internet data without a warrant from a border security bill. This happened because many people and groups were unhappy. The government says it wants to pass the border rules first and will look at the data access rules later.

#Canada, #Privacy, #BillC2, #DataAccess, #LawEnforcement

https://newsletter.tf/canada-removes-data-access-powers-border-bill-october-2025/

The Canadian government has removed rules that would have let police get internet data without a warrant from a border security bill. This happened because many people and groups were unhappy. The government says it wants to pass the border rules first and will look at the data access rules later.

#Canada, #Privacy, #BillC2, #DataAccess, #LawEnforcement

https://newsletter.tf/canada-removes-data-access-powers-border-bill-october-2025/

🚫403 ERROR: The secret to understanding EV battery health is... drumroll, please... absolutely nothing! 🎉 Because who needs actual information when you can simply gaze into the abyss of a "Forbidden" screen and pretend to learn? 🙄🔋
https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/ #EVbatteryHealth #ForbiddenKnowledge #TechHumor #DataAccess #Issues #HackerNews #ngated

🚫403 ERROR: The secret to understanding EV battery health is... drumroll, please... absolutely nothing! 🎉 Because who needs actual information when you can simply gaze into the abyss of a "Forbidden" screen and pretend to learn? 🙄🔋
https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/ #EVbatteryHealth #ForbiddenKnowledge #TechHumor #DataAccess #Issues #HackerNews #ngated

🚫403 ERROR: The secret to understanding EV battery health is... drumroll, please... absolutely nothing! 🎉 Because who needs actual information when you can simply gaze into the abyss of a "Forbidden" screen and pretend to learn? 🙄🔋
https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/ #EVbatteryHealth #ForbiddenKnowledge #TechHumor #DataAccess #Issues #HackerNews #ngated

🚫403 ERROR: The secret to understanding EV battery health is... drumroll, please... absolutely nothing! 🎉 Because who needs actual information when you can simply gaze into the abyss of a "Forbidden" screen and pretend to learn? 🙄🔋
https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/ #EVbatteryHealth #ForbiddenKnowledge #TechHumor #DataAccess #Issues #HackerNews #ngated

Secure and Intelligent: Queryable Encryption and Vector Search in MongoDB EF Core Provider is.gd/fFTPk9 #dotnet #efcore #mongodb #dataaccess #csharp #orm

Secure and Intelligent: Querya...

Secure and Intelligent: Queryable Encryption and Vector Search in MongoDB EF Core Provider is.gd/fFTPk9 #dotnet #efcore #mongodb #dataaccess #csharp #orm

Secure and Intelligent: Querya...

EU regulators identify gatekeepers' AI advantages in data and infrastructure access: High-Level Group paper maps Digital Markets Act interplay with AI competition as Brussels opens Google investigation on December 9, 2025, examining content usage terms. https://ppc.land/eu-regulators-identify-gatekeepers-ai-advantages-in-data-and-infrastructure-access/ #AIRegulation #DigitalMarketsAct #GoogleInvestigation #AIEthics #DataAccess

EU regulators identify gatekeepers' AI advantages in data and infrastructure access: High-Level Group paper maps Digital Markets Act interplay with AI competition as Brussels opens Google investigation on December 9, 2025, examining content usage terms. https://ppc.land/eu-regulators-identify-gatekeepers-ai-advantages-in-data-and-infrastructure-access/ #AIRegulation #DigitalMarketsAct #GoogleInvestigation #AIEthics #DataAccess

EU regulators identify gatekeepers' AI advantages in data and infrastructure access: High-Level Group paper maps Digital Markets Act interplay with AI competition as Brussels opens Google investigation on December 9, 2025, examining content usage terms. https://ppc.land/eu-regulators-identify-gatekeepers-ai-advantages-in-data-and-infrastructure-access/ #AIRegulation #DigitalMarketsAct #GoogleInvestigation #AIEthics #DataAccess

EU regulators identify gatekeepers' AI advantages in data and infrastructure access: High-Level Group paper maps Digital Markets Act interplay with AI competition as Brussels opens Google investigation on December 9, 2025, examining content usage terms. https://ppc.land/eu-regulators-identify-gatekeepers-ai-advantages-in-data-and-infrastructure-access/ #AIRegulation #DigitalMarketsAct #GoogleInvestigation #AIEthics #DataAccess

EU regulators identify gatekeepers' AI advantages in data and infrastructure access: High-Level Group paper maps Digital Markets Act interplay with AI competition as Brussels opens Google investigation on December 9, 2025, examining content usage terms. https://ppc.land/eu-regulators-identify-gatekeepers-ai-advantages-in-data-and-infrastructure-access/ #AIRegulation #DigitalMarketsAct #GoogleInvestigation #AIEthics #DataAccess

Stop letting governance slow down your insights. Our new self-service dashboard for Microsoft Fabric and Purview means data professionals spend less time chasing approvals and more time driving business value. Efficiency and peace of mind—all at your fingertips.

Read more 👉 https://lttr.ai/Alu4V

#DataAccess #ApproveEasy #M365Show

🚨BREAKING: #Sandisk innovates the art of losing things with a #USB-C #flash #drive that can hold up to 1 TB (or approximately 1,000 TB of lost files). 💾🎉 Now you can misplace your data in style, starting at just $15.99. Thanks, Sandisk, for making #storage so... extreme. 🙄✨
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Sandisk-launches-dongle-like-Extreme-Fit-USB-C-flash-drive-with-up-to-1-TB-capacity.1156601.0.html #innovation #tech #lostfiles #dataaccess #HackerNews #ngated