home.social

#digitalmarkets — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #digitalmarkets, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Apple Overhauls EU App Store Fees to Settle Dispute

    Apple replaces its controversial Core Technology Fee with a 5% commission on third-party app purchases in Europe, cutting developer costs under new unified terms.

    pulseofnations.lol/apple-overh

    #Antitrust #AppStore #Apple #Developers #DigitalMarkets #Europe #Fees

  2. Apple Overhauls EU App Store Fees to Settle Dispute

    Apple replaces its controversial Core Technology Fee with a 5% commission on third-party app purchases in Europe, cutting developer costs under new unified terms.

    pulseofnations.lol/apple-overh

    #Antitrust #AppStore #Apple #Developers #DigitalMarkets #Europe #Fees

  3. Apple Overhauls EU App Store Fees to Settle Dispute

    Apple replaces its controversial Core Technology Fee with a 5% commission on third-party app purchases in Europe, cutting developer costs under new unified terms.

    pulseofnations.lol/apple-overh

    #Antitrust #AppStore #Apple #Developers #DigitalMarkets #Europe #Fees

  4. Apple Overhauls EU App Store Fees to Settle Dispute

    Apple replaces its controversial Core Technology Fee with a 5% commission on third-party app purchases in Europe, cutting developer costs under new unified terms.

    pulseofnations.lol/apple-overh

    #Antitrust #AppStore #Apple #Developers #DigitalMarkets #Europe #Fees

  5. Apple Overhauls EU App Store Fees to Settle Dispute

    Apple replaces its controversial Core Technology Fee with a 5% commission on third-party app purchases in Europe, cutting developer costs under new unified terms.

    pulseofnations.lol/apple-overh

    #Antitrust #AppStore #Apple #Developers #DigitalMarkets #Europe #Fees

  6. The U.S. Supreme Court has granted Apple a 24-hour stay in its legal battle with Epic Games over App Store fees, allowing more time to propose developer charges. This case could set important precedents for platform fee structures and developer relations in digital marketplaces.

    #Apple #EpicGames #AppStore #LegalBattle #DigitalMarkets #PlatformFees

    thedailytechfeed.com/supreme-c

  7. The U.S. Supreme Court has granted Apple a 24-hour stay in its legal battle with Epic Games over App Store fees, allowing more time to propose developer charges. This case could set important precedents for platform fee structures and developer relations in digital marketplaces.

    #Apple #EpicGames #AppStore #LegalBattle #DigitalMarkets #PlatformFees

    thedailytechfeed.com/supreme-c

  8. The U.S. Supreme Court has granted Apple a 24-hour stay in its legal battle with Epic Games over App Store fees, allowing more time to propose developer charges. This case could set important precedents for platform fee structures and developer relations in digital marketplaces.

    #Apple #EpicGames #AppStore #LegalBattle #DigitalMarkets #PlatformFees

    thedailytechfeed.com/supreme-c

  9. The U.S. Supreme Court has granted Apple a 24-hour stay in its legal battle with Epic Games over App Store fees, allowing more time to propose developer charges. This case could set important precedents for platform fee structures and developer relations in digital marketplaces.

    #Apple #EpicGames #AppStore #LegalBattle #DigitalMarkets #PlatformFees

    thedailytechfeed.com/supreme-c

  10. Google Faces Up to $10 Billion in Rival Lawsuits After EU Fine

    This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Alphabet (GOOGL, Financials), Google’s parent firm, is facing a mounting wave of…
    #Europe #EU #DigitalMarkets #EuropeanUnion #Google #GuruFocus #privatelawsuits
    europesays.com/europe/104350/

  11. Apple Loses EU Appeal Over App Store and iOS Gatekeeper Status (AAPL)

    Apple iPhone showing apps ©Adobe Stock Images Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) has failed in its attempt to overturn European Union…
    #Europe #EU #appstore #Apple #Applestockprice #DigitalMarkets #DigitalMarketsAct #DMA #EU’sGeneralCourt #EuropeanCommission #EuropeanUnion
    europesays.com/europe/89255/

  12. EU court confirms Apple’s status as digital gatekeeper

    Apple’s App Store and the iOS operating system are rightly classified as online “gatekeepers,” an EU court ruled…
    #Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #Apple #AppleStore #AppleWatch #DigitalMarkets #gatekeeper #TheEuropeanCommission #TheEuropeanUnion
    europesays.com/europe/89239/

  13. Acht Jahre.

    So lange hat es gedauert, bis das Verfahren gegen Google rund um Android endgültig abgeschlossen ist. Unabhängig davon, wie man den Fall bewertet, zeigt er vor allem eines: Technologie entwickelt sich in Monaten. Regulierung oft in Jahren.

    Die eigentliche Herausforderung besteht darin, beides zusammenzubringen.

    #Google #EU #DigitalMarkets #Competition #Technology #Regulation #Mastodon

  14. Acht Jahre.

    So lange hat es gedauert, bis das Verfahren gegen Google rund um Android endgültig abgeschlossen ist. Unabhängig davon, wie man den Fall bewertet, zeigt er vor allem eines: Technologie entwickelt sich in Monaten. Regulierung oft in Jahren.

    Die eigentliche Herausforderung besteht darin, beides zusammenzubringen.

    #Google #EU #DigitalMarkets #Competition #Technology #Regulation #Mastodon

  15. Acht Jahre.

    So lange hat es gedauert, bis das Verfahren gegen Google rund um Android endgültig abgeschlossen ist. Unabhängig davon, wie man den Fall bewertet, zeigt er vor allem eines: Technologie entwickelt sich in Monaten. Regulierung oft in Jahren.

    Die eigentliche Herausforderung besteht darin, beides zusammenzubringen.

    #Google #EU #DigitalMarkets #Competition #Technology #Regulation #Mastodon

  16. Acht Jahre.

    So lange hat es gedauert, bis das Verfahren gegen Google rund um Android endgültig abgeschlossen ist. Unabhängig davon, wie man den Fall bewertet, zeigt er vor allem eines: Technologie entwickelt sich in Monaten. Regulierung oft in Jahren.

    Die eigentliche Herausforderung besteht darin, beides zusammenzubringen.

    #Google #EU #DigitalMarkets #Competition #Technology #Regulation #Mastodon

  17. Acht Jahre.

    So lange hat es gedauert, bis das Verfahren gegen Google rund um Android endgültig abgeschlossen ist. Unabhängig davon, wie man den Fall bewertet, zeigt er vor allem eines: Technologie entwickelt sich in Monaten. Regulierung oft in Jahren.

    Die eigentliche Herausforderung besteht darin, beides zusammenzubringen.

    #Google #EU #DigitalMarkets #Competition #Technology #Regulation #Mastodon

  18. Top EU court upholds Google Android fine in landmark antitrust case – POLITICO

    The ruling “fails to recognize our significant investment to ensure Android remains open, interoperable and free,” a Google…
    #Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #Antitrust #Article102 #BigTech #Competition #Competition/antitrust #Courts #digital #DigitalMarkets #DigitalMarketsAct #EUcompetition #MargretheVestager #Markets #Mobile #Platforms #Services
    europesays.com/europe/84582/

  19. EU plans to fine Google high triple-digit million euro sum, Handelsblatt reports

    The European Union is planning to ​fine Alphabet’s (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google a high triple-digit million euro…
    #Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #DigitalMarkets #DMA #Google #Handelsblatt
    europesays.com/europe/52257/

  20. Fortnite's Global Return to App Stores Signals Shifting Sands in Digital Markets

    Fortnite is back on the Apple App Store worldwide. Epic Games says this is due to Apple's recent court statements about fees. Find out what this means for users.

    #Fortnite, #AppleAppStore, #EpicGames, #GamingNews, #DigitalMarkets

    newsletter.tf/fortnite-returns

  21. Fortnite is now available on the Apple App Store again worldwide. This is a big change after a long legal battle between Epic Games and Apple.

    #Fortnite, #AppleAppStore, #EpicGames, #GamingNews, #DigitalMarkets
    newsletter.tf/fortnite-returns

  22. Anti-Competition by Design

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 6, 2026

    Competition is what keeps markets honest. When users can move freely, platforms must earn loyalty through better service. On X, that freedom has narrowed. The system increasingly rewards staying inside one ecosystem and quietly punishes anyone who tries to operate outside it.

    This essay explains how that design works and why it harms Filipino creators, journalists, and small businesses.

    How Lock-In Replaces Competition

    Healthy platforms compete for users by improving tools, reliability, and trust. Unhealthy ones compete by making exit costly.

    On X, creators who post links to outside sites often see reduced reach. Accounts that encourage audiences to follow them elsewhere grow more slowly. Over time, users learn an unspoken rule: keep everything inside the platform or accept penalties.

    This is not open competition. It is enforced dependence.

    Why This Matters More in the Philippines

    Filipino creators rarely rely on a single income source. Many combine writing, freelancing, donations, and small online sales. That requires moving audiences between platforms.

    When one platform blocks that movement, it blocks income. A creator may have followers, but no way to convert that attention into support elsewhere. The platform keeps the audience. The creator carries the risk.

    This imbalance is especially damaging in lower-income markets.

    Small Businesses Face the Same Wall

    Local businesses use social media to reach customers, then send them to websites, booking pages, or messaging apps. When those links are suppressed, business slows.

    Owners often do not know why traffic drops. They blame themselves, not the platform. Meanwhile, the platform keeps users scrolling instead of buying.

    Anti-competitive design is most effective when it is quiet.

    Choice Without Real Freedom

    Supporters often argue that users can leave at any time. In theory, that is true. In practice, audiences are locked in.

    Years of work, followers, and reputation are tied to one system. Leaving means starting over. Staying means accepting rules that favor the platform over the user.

    That is not free choice. It is constrained choice.

    Why This Is a Business Failure

    Markets grow when value flows in many directions. Platforms that block movement limit growth for everyone except themselves.

    For Filipino users, this means fewer options, lower income, and higher risk. For the platform, it means declining trust and long-term instability.

    Anti-competition may protect control in the short term, but it weakens the ecosystem over time.

    Looking Ahead

    The next essay will examine how these same design choices affect advertisers and why many brands avoid platforms with unpredictable and restrictive behavior.

    When competition is designed out of the system, users always pay the price.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    This essay will be archived in the WPS News Archives at Amazon.

    References (APA)

    European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and platform competition. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

    Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023). Competition and platform lock-in. https://www.eff.org

    Reuters. (2024). Brands rethink spending on X amid policy changes. https://www.reuters.com

    #anticompetition #creatorEconomy #digitalMarkets #internetPlatforms #marketPower #onlineIncome #Philippines #platformEconomics #smallBusinesses #socialMediaPlatforms #Twitter #XPlatform
  23. Anti-Competition by Design

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 6, 2026

    Competition is what keeps markets honest. When users can move freely, platforms must earn loyalty through better service. On X, that freedom has narrowed. The system increasingly rewards staying inside one ecosystem and quietly punishes anyone who tries to operate outside it.

    This essay explains how that design works and why it harms Filipino creators, journalists, and small businesses.

    How Lock-In Replaces Competition

    Healthy platforms compete for users by improving tools, reliability, and trust. Unhealthy ones compete by making exit costly.

    On X, creators who post links to outside sites often see reduced reach. Accounts that encourage audiences to follow them elsewhere grow more slowly. Over time, users learn an unspoken rule: keep everything inside the platform or accept penalties.

    This is not open competition. It is enforced dependence.

    Why This Matters More in the Philippines

    Filipino creators rarely rely on a single income source. Many combine writing, freelancing, donations, and small online sales. That requires moving audiences between platforms.

    When one platform blocks that movement, it blocks income. A creator may have followers, but no way to convert that attention into support elsewhere. The platform keeps the audience. The creator carries the risk.

    This imbalance is especially damaging in lower-income markets.

    Small Businesses Face the Same Wall

    Local businesses use social media to reach customers, then send them to websites, booking pages, or messaging apps. When those links are suppressed, business slows.

    Owners often do not know why traffic drops. They blame themselves, not the platform. Meanwhile, the platform keeps users scrolling instead of buying.

    Anti-competitive design is most effective when it is quiet.

    Choice Without Real Freedom

    Supporters often argue that users can leave at any time. In theory, that is true. In practice, audiences are locked in.

    Years of work, followers, and reputation are tied to one system. Leaving means starting over. Staying means accepting rules that favor the platform over the user.

    That is not free choice. It is constrained choice.

    Why This Is a Business Failure

    Markets grow when value flows in many directions. Platforms that block movement limit growth for everyone except themselves.

    For Filipino users, this means fewer options, lower income, and higher risk. For the platform, it means declining trust and long-term instability.

    Anti-competition may protect control in the short term, but it weakens the ecosystem over time.

    Looking Ahead

    The next essay will examine how these same design choices affect advertisers and why many brands avoid platforms with unpredictable and restrictive behavior.

    When competition is designed out of the system, users always pay the price.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    This essay will be archived in the WPS News Archives at Amazon.

    References (APA)

    European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and platform competition. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

    Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023). Competition and platform lock-in. https://www.eff.org

    Reuters. (2024). Brands rethink spending on X amid policy changes. https://www.reuters.com

    #anticompetition #creatorEconomy #digitalMarkets #internetPlatforms #marketPower #onlineIncome #Philippines #platformEconomics #smallBusinesses #socialMediaPlatforms #Twitter #XPlatform
  24. Anti-Competition by Design

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 6, 2026

    Competition is what keeps markets honest. When users can move freely, platforms must earn loyalty through better service. On X, that freedom has narrowed. The system increasingly rewards staying inside one ecosystem and quietly punishes anyone who tries to operate outside it.

    This essay explains how that design works and why it harms Filipino creators, journalists, and small businesses.

    How Lock-In Replaces Competition

    Healthy platforms compete for users by improving tools, reliability, and trust. Unhealthy ones compete by making exit costly.

    On X, creators who post links to outside sites often see reduced reach. Accounts that encourage audiences to follow them elsewhere grow more slowly. Over time, users learn an unspoken rule: keep everything inside the platform or accept penalties.

    This is not open competition. It is enforced dependence.

    Why This Matters More in the Philippines

    Filipino creators rarely rely on a single income source. Many combine writing, freelancing, donations, and small online sales. That requires moving audiences between platforms.

    When one platform blocks that movement, it blocks income. A creator may have followers, but no way to convert that attention into support elsewhere. The platform keeps the audience. The creator carries the risk.

    This imbalance is especially damaging in lower-income markets.

    Small Businesses Face the Same Wall

    Local businesses use social media to reach customers, then send them to websites, booking pages, or messaging apps. When those links are suppressed, business slows.

    Owners often do not know why traffic drops. They blame themselves, not the platform. Meanwhile, the platform keeps users scrolling instead of buying.

    Anti-competitive design is most effective when it is quiet.

    Choice Without Real Freedom

    Supporters often argue that users can leave at any time. In theory, that is true. In practice, audiences are locked in.

    Years of work, followers, and reputation are tied to one system. Leaving means starting over. Staying means accepting rules that favor the platform over the user.

    That is not free choice. It is constrained choice.

    Why This Is a Business Failure

    Markets grow when value flows in many directions. Platforms that block movement limit growth for everyone except themselves.

    For Filipino users, this means fewer options, lower income, and higher risk. For the platform, it means declining trust and long-term instability.

    Anti-competition may protect control in the short term, but it weakens the ecosystem over time.

    Looking Ahead

    The next essay will examine how these same design choices affect advertisers and why many brands avoid platforms with unpredictable and restrictive behavior.

    When competition is designed out of the system, users always pay the price.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    This essay will be archived in the WPS News Archives at Amazon.

    References (APA)

    European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and platform competition. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

    Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023). Competition and platform lock-in. https://www.eff.org

    Reuters. (2024). Brands rethink spending on X amid policy changes. https://www.reuters.com

    #anticompetition #creatorEconomy #digitalMarkets #internetPlatforms #marketPower #onlineIncome #Philippines #platformEconomics #smallBusinesses #socialMediaPlatforms #Twitter #XPlatform
  25. Anti-Competition by Design

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 6, 2026

    Competition is what keeps markets honest. When users can move freely, platforms must earn loyalty through better service. On X, that freedom has narrowed. The system increasingly rewards staying inside one ecosystem and quietly punishes anyone who tries to operate outside it.

    This essay explains how that design works and why it harms Filipino creators, journalists, and small businesses.

    How Lock-In Replaces Competition

    Healthy platforms compete for users by improving tools, reliability, and trust. Unhealthy ones compete by making exit costly.

    On X, creators who post links to outside sites often see reduced reach. Accounts that encourage audiences to follow them elsewhere grow more slowly. Over time, users learn an unspoken rule: keep everything inside the platform or accept penalties.

    This is not open competition. It is enforced dependence.

    Why This Matters More in the Philippines

    Filipino creators rarely rely on a single income source. Many combine writing, freelancing, donations, and small online sales. That requires moving audiences between platforms.

    When one platform blocks that movement, it blocks income. A creator may have followers, but no way to convert that attention into support elsewhere. The platform keeps the audience. The creator carries the risk.

    This imbalance is especially damaging in lower-income markets.

    Small Businesses Face the Same Wall

    Local businesses use social media to reach customers, then send them to websites, booking pages, or messaging apps. When those links are suppressed, business slows.

    Owners often do not know why traffic drops. They blame themselves, not the platform. Meanwhile, the platform keeps users scrolling instead of buying.

    Anti-competitive design is most effective when it is quiet.

    Choice Without Real Freedom

    Supporters often argue that users can leave at any time. In theory, that is true. In practice, audiences are locked in.

    Years of work, followers, and reputation are tied to one system. Leaving means starting over. Staying means accepting rules that favor the platform over the user.

    That is not free choice. It is constrained choice.

    Why This Is a Business Failure

    Markets grow when value flows in many directions. Platforms that block movement limit growth for everyone except themselves.

    For Filipino users, this means fewer options, lower income, and higher risk. For the platform, it means declining trust and long-term instability.

    Anti-competition may protect control in the short term, but it weakens the ecosystem over time.

    Looking Ahead

    The next essay will examine how these same design choices affect advertisers and why many brands avoid platforms with unpredictable and restrictive behavior.

    When competition is designed out of the system, users always pay the price.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    This essay will be archived in the WPS News Archives at Amazon.

    References (APA)

    European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and platform competition. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

    Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023). Competition and platform lock-in. https://www.eff.org

    Reuters. (2024). Brands rethink spending on X amid policy changes. https://www.reuters.com

    #anticompetition #creatorEconomy #digitalMarkets #internetPlatforms #marketPower #onlineIncome #Philippines #platformEconomics #smallBusinesses #socialMediaPlatforms #Twitter #XPlatform
  26. Anti-Competition by Design

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 6, 2026

    Competition is what keeps markets honest. When users can move freely, platforms must earn loyalty through better service. On X, that freedom has narrowed. The system increasingly rewards staying inside one ecosystem and quietly punishes anyone who tries to operate outside it.

    This essay explains how that design works and why it harms Filipino creators, journalists, and small businesses.

    How Lock-In Replaces Competition

    Healthy platforms compete for users by improving tools, reliability, and trust. Unhealthy ones compete by making exit costly.

    On X, creators who post links to outside sites often see reduced reach. Accounts that encourage audiences to follow them elsewhere grow more slowly. Over time, users learn an unspoken rule: keep everything inside the platform or accept penalties.

    This is not open competition. It is enforced dependence.

    Why This Matters More in the Philippines

    Filipino creators rarely rely on a single income source. Many combine writing, freelancing, donations, and small online sales. That requires moving audiences between platforms.

    When one platform blocks that movement, it blocks income. A creator may have followers, but no way to convert that attention into support elsewhere. The platform keeps the audience. The creator carries the risk.

    This imbalance is especially damaging in lower-income markets.

    Small Businesses Face the Same Wall

    Local businesses use social media to reach customers, then send them to websites, booking pages, or messaging apps. When those links are suppressed, business slows.

    Owners often do not know why traffic drops. They blame themselves, not the platform. Meanwhile, the platform keeps users scrolling instead of buying.

    Anti-competitive design is most effective when it is quiet.

    Choice Without Real Freedom

    Supporters often argue that users can leave at any time. In theory, that is true. In practice, audiences are locked in.

    Years of work, followers, and reputation are tied to one system. Leaving means starting over. Staying means accepting rules that favor the platform over the user.

    That is not free choice. It is constrained choice.

    Why This Is a Business Failure

    Markets grow when value flows in many directions. Platforms that block movement limit growth for everyone except themselves.

    For Filipino users, this means fewer options, lower income, and higher risk. For the platform, it means declining trust and long-term instability.

    Anti-competition may protect control in the short term, but it weakens the ecosystem over time.

    Looking Ahead

    The next essay will examine how these same design choices affect advertisers and why many brands avoid platforms with unpredictable and restrictive behavior.

    When competition is designed out of the system, users always pay the price.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    This essay will be archived in the WPS News Archives at Amazon.

    References (APA)

    European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and platform competition. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

    Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2023). Competition and platform lock-in. https://www.eff.org

    Reuters. (2024). Brands rethink spending on X amid policy changes. https://www.reuters.com

    #anticompetition #creatorEconomy #digitalMarkets #internetPlatforms #marketPower #onlineIncome #Philippines #platformEconomics #smallBusinesses #socialMediaPlatforms #Twitter #XPlatform
  27. The EU’s Big Tech rulebook is shifting the digital economy, says Ribera – POLITICO

    Ribera’s comments come as Brussels prepares for a formal review of the DMA to determine what is working…
    #Economy #antitrust #competition #Competitionrules #DigitalMarkets #DigitalMarketsAct #Platforms #TeresaRibera #UnitedStates
    europesays.com/2909445/

  28. The EU’s Big Tech rulebook is shifting the digital economy, says Ribera – POLITICO

    Ribera’s comments come as Brussels prepares for a formal review of the DMA to determine what is working…
    #Europe #EU #Antitrust #Competition #Competitionrules #DigitalMarkets #DigitalMarketsAct #EuropeanUnion #Platforms #TeresaRibera #UnitedStates
    europesays.com/europe/10879/

  29. Britain's watchdog aims for Google's AI: what publishers gain: Publishers would control AI training opt-outs while Google must prove fair ranking under first UK digital markets conduct requirements targeting search dominance. ppc.land/britains-watchdog-aim #GoogleAI #DigitalMarkets #PublishersRights #AIEthics #SearchEngine

  30. Britain's watchdog aims for Google's AI: what publishers gain: Publishers would control AI training opt-outs while Google must prove fair ranking under first UK digital markets conduct requirements targeting search dominance. ppc.land/britains-watchdog-aim #GoogleAI #DigitalMarkets #PublishersRights #AIEthics #SearchEngine

  31. Britain's watchdog aims for Google's AI: what publishers gain: Publishers would control AI training opt-outs while Google must prove fair ranking under first UK digital markets conduct requirements targeting search dominance. ppc.land/britains-watchdog-aim #GoogleAI #DigitalMarkets #PublishersRights #AIEthics #SearchEngine

  32. Britain's watchdog aims for Google's AI: what publishers gain: Publishers would control AI training opt-outs while Google must prove fair ranking under first UK digital markets conduct requirements targeting search dominance. ppc.land/britains-watchdog-aim #GoogleAI #DigitalMarkets #PublishersRights #AIEthics #SearchEngine

  33. Britain's watchdog aims for Google's AI: what publishers gain: Publishers would control AI training opt-outs while Google must prove fair ranking under first UK digital markets conduct requirements targeting search dominance. ppc.land/britains-watchdog-aim #GoogleAI #DigitalMarkets #PublishersRights #AIEthics #SearchEngine

  34. Publiquei hoje, no Floresta Digital, algumas reflexões sobre a regulação econômica dos mercados digitais, incluindo ideias de emendas ao PL 4.675/25, em análise na Câmara.

    florestadigital.tec.br/a-verda

    #digitalplatforms #digitalmarkets #competition #regulation

  35. Publiquei hoje, no Floresta Digital, algumas reflexões sobre a regulação econômica dos mercados digitais, incluindo ideias de emendas ao PL 4.675/25, em análise na Câmara.

    florestadigital.tec.br/a-verda

    #digitalplatforms #digitalmarkets #competition #regulation

  36. 📢 Exciting Insights into AI and Competition Law! 🚀

    In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, strategic partnerships between tech giants and smaller AI developers are shaping both innovation and competition. The latest paper by Josef Drexl and Daria Kim examines the controversies surrounding these alliances and how competition law should respond. 💡

    🔗 Read the full paper here: ssrn.com/abstract=5439660

    #AI #Innovation #CompetitionLaw #DigitalMarkets #OpenSource #TechPolicy

  37. 📢 Exciting Insights into AI and Competition Law! 🚀

    In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, strategic partnerships between tech giants and smaller AI developers are shaping both innovation and competition. The latest paper by Josef Drexl and Daria Kim examines the controversies surrounding these alliances and how competition law should respond. 💡

    🔗 Read the full paper here: ssrn.com/abstract=5439660

    #AI #Innovation #CompetitionLaw #DigitalMarkets #OpenSource #TechPolicy

  38. As part of the final judgment, Google is now required to share click-through data with qualified competitors.

    This is a historic move toward search engine interoperability and could reshape the competitive landscape of search and AI training data.

    📄 Full judgment (286 pages):
    documentcloud.org/documents/25

    #Google #Antitrust #SearchEngines #Interoperability #OpenSearch #DigitalMarkets #CompetitionLaw #TechPolicy #DataAccess #PlatformRegulation #SearchMonopoly

  39. As part of the final judgment, Google is now required to share click-through data with qualified competitors.

    This is a historic move toward search engine interoperability and could reshape the competitive landscape of search and AI training data.

    📄 Full judgment (286 pages):
    documentcloud.org/documents/25

    #Google #Antitrust #SearchEngines #Interoperability #OpenSearch #DigitalMarkets #CompetitionLaw #TechPolicy #DataAccess #PlatformRegulation #SearchMonopoly

  40. As part of the final judgment, Google is now required to share click-through data with qualified competitors.

    This is a historic move toward search engine interoperability and could reshape the competitive landscape of search and AI training data.

    📄 Full judgment (286 pages):
    documentcloud.org/documents/25

    #Google #Antitrust #SearchEngines #Interoperability #OpenSearch #DigitalMarkets #CompetitionLaw #TechPolicy #DataAccess #PlatformRegulation #SearchMonopoly

  41. As part of the final judgment, Google is now required to share click-through data with qualified competitors.

    This is a historic move toward search engine interoperability and could reshape the competitive landscape of search and AI training data.

    📄 Full judgment (286 pages):
    documentcloud.org/documents/25

    #Google #Antitrust #SearchEngines #Interoperability #OpenSearch #DigitalMarkets #CompetitionLaw #TechPolicy #DataAccess #PlatformRegulation #SearchMonopoly

  42. As part of the final judgment, Google is now required to share click-through data with qualified competitors.

    This is a historic move toward search engine interoperability and could reshape the competitive landscape of search and AI training data.

    📄 Full judgment (286 pages):
    documentcloud.org/documents/25

    #Google #Antitrust #SearchEngines #Interoperability #OpenSearch #DigitalMarkets #CompetitionLaw #TechPolicy #DataAccess #PlatformRegulation #SearchMonopoly

  43. La Commissione europea sta valutando le proposte di Microsoft per risolvere le preoccupazioni antitrust su #Teams (maggio 2025). Sono sufficienti? Stakeholder invitati a dare feedback. #Antitrust #Microsoft #MSTeams #EUteams #DigitalMarkets #DMA
    ec.europa.eu/commission/pressc

  44. La Commissione europea sta valutando le proposte di Microsoft per risolvere le preoccupazioni antitrust su #Teams (maggio 2025). Sono sufficienti? Stakeholder invitati a dare feedback. #Antitrust #Microsoft #MSTeams #EUteams #DigitalMarkets #DMA
    ec.europa.eu/commission/pressc

  45. La Commissione europea sta valutando le proposte di Microsoft per risolvere le preoccupazioni antitrust su #Teams (maggio 2025). Sono sufficienti? Stakeholder invitati a dare feedback. #Antitrust #Microsoft #MSTeams #EUteams #DigitalMarkets #DMA
    ec.europa.eu/commission/pressc