#pii — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #pii, aggregated by home.social.
-
Among the latest data-breach villains: the Washington Post
Members of the Washington Post’s extended diaspora, meaning both former employees as well as past freelancers, have begun getting an unwelcome reminder of that chapter in their professional lives: a letter from the Post, sent from an address not in the District but in West Sacramento, Calif., informing them of a “Data Security Incident.”
That inefficient phrase is defensive legalese for “data breach,” which the letter says, in comparably defensive passive voice, happened between July 10 and Aug. 22, 2025, when “certain data was accessed and acquired without authorization” from unspecified Oracle E-Business Suite applications.
In my case and others, to judge from reports from fellow recipients of this joyless notice, the “certain data” included names and Social Security numbers.
The letter may not spark any more joy at Oracle, since it describes the vulnerability exploited as a “previously unknown and widespread” flaw. Oracle’s own warning red-flags it as “remotely exploitable without authentication.” But the paper’s disclosure does not address another cause of the data breach: how the Post chose to retain this sort of sensitive data long after it should have stopped being regularly business-relevant.
Consider my example: The last time I had any ongoing transactions with the Post that should have involved my SSN was 15 years ago. I rolled over my 401(K) after leaving the paper, and Jeff Bezos buying the Post in 2013 resulted in the company transferring my pension and those of other ex-Posties to former publisher Don Graham’s firm Graham Holdings.
For the handful of freelance pieces I’ve sold to my old shop since then (such as the Jan. 28, 2019 opinion piece headlined “Big tech firms still don’t care about your privacy”), I’ve used the Employer Identification Number I obtained shortly after I started freelancing.
Yet apparently my SSN was still sitting unencrypted in a network-accessible database last summer, contrary to basic security advice, along with the digits of thousands of other current and former Post employees and contractors. Some had banking details compromised too.
That’s “thousands” as in 9,720 people, per a filing the Post made with Maine’s Attorney General in November that a few security publications covered at the time. A month later, a former Post employee named Jun Hee Kim filed a class-action lawsuit against the Post on behalf of those nearly 10,000 individuals.
I have yet to get a notice inviting me to join that class, and the Post’s letter does not mention the litigation. Instead, it offers the usual paltry remedy of a year of identity-theft monitoring, in this case from a firm called IDX.
I know that’s the standard act of apology not only from covering data breaches but from having my data exposed in them, over and over. I know the drill well enough to have turned “Equifax” into the verb “Equifaxed” and to have frozen my credit more than once.
So at some level, I’m not surprised at the news of the Post’s data breach so much as I’m surprised that it took this long. Throughout my time working at 15th and L, I saw the Post treat SSNs as carelessly as anybody else did decades ago–even using them as employee IDs, as seen in some of my own admin paperwork from early in this century showing the full nine digits. But it’s still stupid and sloppy that this particular data breach happened not in 2005 or 2015 but in 2025, well past the point when management at the Post should have known better.
#Cl0p #CVE202561882 #dataBreach #dataMinimization #DataSecurityIncident #EIN #EmployerIdentificationNumber #Equifax #Equifaxed #IDX #Oracle #OracleEBusinessSuite #personallyIdentifiableInformation #PII #SocialSecurityNumber #SSN #TaxIDNumber #wapo #washingtonPost -
Among the latest data-breach villains: the Washington Post
Members of the Washington Post’s extended diaspora, meaning both former employees as well as past freelancers, have begun getting an unwelcome reminder of that chapter in their professional lives: a letter from the Post, sent from an address not in the District but in West Sacramento, Calif., informing them of a “Data Security Incident.”
That inefficient phrase is defensive legalese for “data breach,” which the letter says, in comparably defensive passive voice, happened between July 10 and Aug. 22, 2025, when “certain data was accessed and acquired without authorization” from unspecified Oracle E-Business Suite applications.
In my case and others, to judge from reports from fellow recipients of this joyless notice, the “certain data” included names and Social Security numbers.
The letter may not spark any more joy at Oracle, since it describes the vulnerability exploited as a “previously unknown and widespread” flaw. Oracle’s own warning red-flags it as “remotely exploitable without authentication.” But the paper’s disclosure does not address another cause of the data breach: how the Post chose to retain this sort of sensitive data long after it should have stopped being regularly business-relevant.
Consider my example: The last time I had any ongoing transactions with the Post that should have involved my SSN was 15 years ago. I rolled over my 401(K) after leaving the paper, and Jeff Bezos buying the Post in 2013 resulted in the company transferring my pension and those of other ex-Posties to former publisher Don Graham’s firm Graham Holdings.
For the handful of freelance pieces I’ve sold to my old shop since then (such as the Jan. 28, 2019 opinion piece headlined “Big tech firms still don’t care about your privacy”), I’ve used the Employer Identification Number I obtained shortly after I started freelancing.
Yet apparently my SSN was still sitting unencrypted in a network-accessible database last summer, contrary to basic security advice, along with the digits of thousands of other current and former Post employees and contractors. Some had banking details compromised too.
That’s “thousands” as in 9,720 people, per a filing the Post made with Maine’s Attorney General in November that a few security publications covered at the time. A month later, a former Post employee named Jun Hee Kim filed a class-action lawsuit against the Post on behalf of those nearly 10,000 individuals.
I have yet to get a notice inviting me to join that class, and the Post’s letter does not mention the litigation. Instead, it offers the usual paltry remedy of a year of identity-theft monitoring, in this case from a firm called IDX.
I know that’s the standard act of apology not only from covering data breaches but from having my data exposed in them, over and over. I know the drill well enough to have turned “Equifax” into the verb “Equifaxed” and to have frozen my credit more than once.
So at some level, I’m not surprised at the news of the Post’s data breach so much as I’m surprised that it took this long. Throughout my time working at 15th and L, I saw the Post treat SSNs as carelessly as anybody else did decades ago–even using them as employee IDs, as seen in some of my own admin paperwork from early in this century showing the full nine digits. But it’s still stupid and sloppy that this particular data breach happened not in 2005 or 2015 but in 2025, well past the point when management at the Post should have known better.
#Cl0p #CVE202561882 #dataBreach #dataMinimization #DataSecurityIncident #EIN #EmployerIdentificationNumber #Equifax #Equifaxed #IDX #Oracle #OracleEBusinessSuite #personallyIdentifiableInformation #PII #SocialSecurityNumber #SSN #TaxIDNumber #wapo #washingtonPost -
Among the latest data-breach villains: the Washington Post
Members of the Washington Post’s extended diaspora, meaning both former employees as well as past freelancers, have begun getting an unwelcome reminder of that chapter in their professional lives: a letter from the Post, sent from an address not in the District but in West Sacramento, Calif., informing them of a “Data Security Incident.”
That inefficient phrase is defensive legalese for “data breach,” which the letter says, in comparably defensive passive voice, happened between July 10 and Aug. 22, 2025, when “certain data was accessed and acquired without authorization” from unspecified Oracle E-Business Suite applications.
In my case and others, to judge from reports from fellow recipients of this joyless notice, the “certain data” included names and Social Security numbers.
The letter may not spark any more joy at Oracle, since it describes the vulnerability exploited as a “previously unknown and widespread” flaw. Oracle’s own warning red-flags it as “remotely exploitable without authentication.” But the paper’s disclosure does not address another cause of the data breach: how the Post chose to retain this sort of sensitive data long after it should have stopped being regularly business-relevant.
Consider my example: The last time I had any ongoing transactions with the Post that should have involved my SSN was 15 years ago. I rolled over my 401(K) after leaving the paper, and Jeff Bezos buying the Post in 2013 resulted in the company transferring my pension and those of other ex-Posties to former publisher Don Graham’s firm Graham Holdings.
For the handful of freelance pieces I’ve sold to my old shop since then (such as the Jan. 28, 2019 opinion piece headlined “Big tech firms still don’t care about your privacy”), I’ve used the Employer Identification Number I obtained shortly after I started freelancing.
Yet apparently my SSN was still sitting unencrypted in a network-accessible database last summer, contrary to basic security advice, along with the digits of thousands of other current and former Post employees and contractors. Some had banking details compromised too.
That’s “thousands” as in 9,720 people, per a filing the Post made with Maine’s Attorney General in November that a few security publications covered at the time. A month later, a former Post employee named Jun Hee Kim filed a class-action lawsuit against the Post on behalf of those nearly 10,000 individuals.
I have yet to get a notice inviting me to join that class, and the Post’s letter does not mention the litigation. Instead, it offers the usual paltry remedy of a year of identity-theft monitoring, in this case from a firm called IDX.
I know that’s the standard act of apology not only from covering data breaches but from having my data exposed in them, over and over. I know the drill well enough to have turned “Equifax” into the verb “Equifaxed” and to have frozen my credit more than once.
So at some level, I’m not surprised at the news of the Post’s data breach so much as I’m surprised that it took this long. Throughout my time working at 15th and L, I saw the Post treat SSNs as carelessly as anybody else did decades ago–even using them as employee IDs, as seen in some of my own admin paperwork from early in this century showing the full nine digits. But it’s still stupid and sloppy that this particular data breach happened not in 2005 or 2015 but in 2025, well past the point when management at the Post should have known better.
#Cl0p #CVE202561882 #dataBreach #dataMinimization #DataSecurityIncident #EIN #EmployerIdentificationNumber #Equifax #Equifaxed #IDX #Oracle #OracleEBusinessSuite #personallyIdentifiableInformation #PII #SocialSecurityNumber #SSN #TaxIDNumber #wapo #washingtonPost -
Among the latest data-breach villains: the Washington Post
Members of the Washington Post’s extended diaspora, meaning both former employees as well as past freelancers, have begun getting an unwelcome reminder of that chapter in their professional lives: a letter from the Post, sent from an address not in the District but in West Sacramento, Calif., informing them of a “Data Security Incident.”
That inefficient phrase is defensive legalese for “data breach,” which the letter says, in comparably defensive passive voice, happened between July 10 and Aug. 22, 2025, when “certain data was accessed and acquired without authorization” from unspecified Oracle E-Business Suite applications.
In my case and others, to judge from reports from fellow recipients of this joyless notice, the “certain data” included names and Social Security numbers.
The letter may not spark any more joy at Oracle, since it describes the vulnerability exploited as a “previously unknown and widespread” flaw. Oracle’s own warning red-flags it as “remotely exploitable without authentication.” But the paper’s disclosure does not address another cause of the data breach: how the Post chose to retain this sort of sensitive data long after it should have stopped being regularly business-relevant.
Consider my example: The last time I had any ongoing transactions with the Post that should have involved my SSN was 15 years ago. I rolled over my 401(K) after leaving the paper, and Jeff Bezos buying the Post in 2013 resulted in the company transferring my pension and those of other ex-Posties to former publisher Don Graham’s firm Graham Holdings.
For the handful of freelance pieces I’ve sold to my old shop since then (such as the Jan. 28, 2019 opinion piece headlined “Big tech firms still don’t care about your privacy”), I’ve used the Employer Identification Number I obtained shortly after I started freelancing.
Yet apparently my SSN was still sitting unencrypted in a network-accessible database last summer, contrary to basic security advice, along with the digits of thousands of other current and former Post employees and contractors. Some had banking details compromised too.
That’s “thousands” as in 9,720 people, per a filing the Post made with Maine’s Attorney General in November that a few security publications covered at the time. A month later, a former Post employee named Jun Hee Kim filed a class-action lawsuit against the Post on behalf of those nearly 10,000 individuals.
I have yet to get a notice inviting me to join that class, and the Post’s letter does not mention the litigation. Instead, it offers the usual paltry remedy of a year of identity-theft monitoring, in this case from a firm called IDX.
I know that’s the standard act of apology not only from covering data breaches but from having my data exposed in them, over and over. I know the drill well enough to have turned “Equifax” into the verb “Equifaxed” and to have frozen my credit more than once.
So at some level, I’m not surprised at the news of the Post’s data breach so much as I’m surprised that it took this long. Throughout my time working at 15th and L, I saw the Post treat SSNs as carelessly as anybody else did decades ago–even using them as employee IDs, as seen in some of my own admin paperwork from early in this century showing the full nine digits. But it’s still stupid and sloppy that this particular data breach happened not in 2005 or 2015 but in 2025, well past the point when management at the Post should have known better.
#Cl0p #CVE202561882 #dataBreach #dataMinimization #DataSecurityIncident #EIN #EmployerIdentificationNumber #Equifax #Equifaxed #IDX #Oracle #OracleEBusinessSuite #personallyIdentifiableInformation #PII #SocialSecurityNumber #SSN #TaxIDNumber #wapo #washingtonPost -
»The French Administrative Supreme Court ruled in favour of La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network (FDN), Franciliens.net and Fédération FDN by recognising that the #Hadopi law’s surveillance system that aims to combat illegal files sharing breaches fundamental rights protected by the European Union. The government has been ordered to repeal the key provisions of this decree.«
-
»The French Administrative Supreme Court ruled in favour of La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network (FDN), Franciliens.net and Fédération FDN by recognising that the #Hadopi law’s surveillance system that aims to combat illegal files sharing breaches fundamental rights protected by the European Union. The government has been ordered to repeal the key provisions of this decree.«
-
»The French Administrative Supreme Court ruled in favour of La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network (FDN), Franciliens.net and Fédération FDN by recognising that the #Hadopi law’s surveillance system that aims to combat illegal files sharing breaches fundamental rights protected by the European Union. The government has been ordered to repeal the key provisions of this decree.«
-
»The French Administrative Supreme Court ruled in favour of La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network (FDN), Franciliens.net and Fédération FDN by recognising that the #Hadopi law’s surveillance system that aims to combat illegal files sharing breaches fundamental rights protected by the European Union. The government has been ordered to repeal the key provisions of this decree.«
-
»The French Administrative Supreme Court ruled in favour of La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network (FDN), Franciliens.net and Fédération FDN by recognising that the #Hadopi law’s surveillance system that aims to combat illegal files sharing breaches fundamental rights protected by the European Union. The government has been ordered to repeal the key provisions of this decree.«
-
Ich denke jetzt schon ne Weile ueber eine mir privat wie beruflich wichtige Frage nach, aber vielleicht gibt es hier intelligente Menschen, die eine Antwort haben:
- Sind verschluesselte Backups von PII Daten auch PII Daten?
- Sind sie es auch, wenn ich den Schluessel NICHT habe?Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf, verschluesselte Backups dezentral zu speichern.
-
Ich denke jetzt schon ne Weile ueber eine mir privat wie beruflich wichtige Frage nach, aber vielleicht gibt es hier intelligente Menschen, die eine Antwort haben:
- Sind verschluesselte Backups von PII Daten auch PII Daten?
- Sind sie es auch, wenn ich den Schluessel NICHT habe?Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf, verschluesselte Backups dezentral zu speichern.
-
Ich denke jetzt schon ne Weile ueber eine mir privat wie beruflich wichtige Frage nach, aber vielleicht gibt es hier intelligente Menschen, die eine Antwort haben:
- Sind verschluesselte Backups von PII Daten auch PII Daten?
- Sind sie es auch, wenn ich den Schluessel NICHT habe?Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf, verschluesselte Backups dezentral zu speichern.
-
Ich denke jetzt schon ne Weile ueber eine mir privat wie beruflich wichtige Frage nach, aber vielleicht gibt es hier intelligente Menschen, die eine Antwort haben:
- Sind verschluesselte Backups von PII Daten auch PII Daten?
- Sind sie es auch, wenn ich den Schluessel NICHT habe?Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf, verschluesselte Backups dezentral zu speichern.
-
Ich denke jetzt schon ne Weile ueber eine mir privat wie beruflich wichtige Frage nach, aber vielleicht gibt es hier intelligente Menschen, die eine Antwort haben:
- Sind verschluesselte Backups von PII Daten auch PII Daten?
- Sind sie es auch, wenn ich den Schluessel NICHT habe?Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf, verschluesselte Backups dezentral zu speichern.
-
I don't know if my complaints made a difference. But I'd like to think they did.
Here's my call to action: make a fuss when someone violates your privacy. Every voice that cries foul helps all of us.
-
I don't know if my complaints made a difference. But I'd like to think they did.
Here's my call to action: make a fuss when someone violates your privacy. Every voice that cries foul helps all of us.
-
I don't know if my complaints made a difference. But I'd like to think they did.
Here's my call to action: make a fuss when someone violates your privacy. Every voice that cries foul helps all of us.
-
I don't know if my complaints made a difference. But I'd like to think they did.
Here's my call to action: make a fuss when someone violates your privacy. Every voice that cries foul helps all of us.
-
I don't know if my complaints made a difference. But I'd like to think they did.
Here's my call to action: make a fuss when someone violates your privacy. Every voice that cries foul helps all of us.
-
Well here we are a year later, and I am happy to report I was able to attend without the privacy violation they demanded a year ago.
I purchased my ticket online, didn't have to upload a picture, and didn't have to submit to a photograph to enter the facility. A staff member scanned my ticket, asked for my ID, they glanced at it, and let me in.
This is how it should be. No one ever needs to harvest your data to verify your identity.
-
Well here we are a year later, and I am happy to report I was able to attend without the privacy violation they demanded a year ago.
I purchased my ticket online, didn't have to upload a picture, and didn't have to submit to a photograph to enter the facility. A staff member scanned my ticket, asked for my ID, they glanced at it, and let me in.
This is how it should be. No one ever needs to harvest your data to verify your identity.
-
Well here we are a year later, and I am happy to report I was able to attend without the privacy violation they demanded a year ago.
I purchased my ticket online, didn't have to upload a picture, and didn't have to submit to a photograph to enter the facility. A staff member scanned my ticket, asked for my ID, they glanced at it, and let me in.
This is how it should be. No one ever needs to harvest your data to verify your identity.
-
Well here we are a year later, and I am happy to report I was able to attend without the privacy violation they demanded a year ago.
I purchased my ticket online, didn't have to upload a picture, and didn't have to submit to a photograph to enter the facility. A staff member scanned my ticket, asked for my ID, they glanced at it, and let me in.
This is how it should be. No one ever needs to harvest your data to verify your identity.
-
Well here we are a year later, and I am happy to report I was able to attend without the privacy violation they demanded a year ago.
I purchased my ticket online, didn't have to upload a picture, and didn't have to submit to a photograph to enter the facility. A staff member scanned my ticket, asked for my ID, they glanced at it, and let me in.
This is how it should be. No one ever needs to harvest your data to verify your identity.
-
I begrudgingly admitted defeat. But I didn't give them my photo. I had a difficult choice to make. Right or wrong, I chose privacy over watching my kid. I was pissed about it then, and I'm still mad about it now.
As a parting shot, I email some links to a few articles on Eff.org and ACLU.org in the hopes they might do some reading and come to realize how wrong they were. And then I tried to let it go.
-
I begrudgingly admitted defeat. But I didn't give them my photo. I had a difficult choice to make. Right or wrong, I chose privacy over watching my kid. I was pissed about it then, and I'm still mad about it now.
As a parting shot, I email some links to a few articles on Eff.org and ACLU.org in the hopes they might do some reading and come to realize how wrong they were. And then I tried to let it go.
-
I begrudgingly admitted defeat. But I didn't give them my photo. I had a difficult choice to make. Right or wrong, I chose privacy over watching my kid. I was pissed about it then, and I'm still mad about it now.
As a parting shot, I email some links to a few articles on Eff.org and ACLU.org in the hopes they might do some reading and come to realize how wrong they were. And then I tried to let it go.
-
I begrudgingly admitted defeat. But I didn't give them my photo. I had a difficult choice to make. Right or wrong, I chose privacy over watching my kid. I was pissed about it then, and I'm still mad about it now.
As a parting shot, I email some links to a few articles on Eff.org and ACLU.org in the hopes they might do some reading and come to realize how wrong they were. And then I tried to let it go.
-
I begrudgingly admitted defeat. But I didn't give them my photo. I had a difficult choice to make. Right or wrong, I chose privacy over watching my kid. I was pissed about it then, and I'm still mad about it now.
As a parting shot, I email some links to a few articles on Eff.org and ACLU.org in the hopes they might do some reading and come to realize how wrong they were. And then I tried to let it go.
-
Then I emailed 11 folks with the Orange County Convention Center (it's a county government building and a public space, after all).
Though slightly more sympathetic, they told me the OCCC doesn't take a stance and that as long as the event organizers are following all state and local laws, they defer to the organizers of each event to determine and implement their own access rules and procedures.
-
Then I emailed 11 folks with the Orange County Convention Center (it's a county government building and a public space, after all).
Though slightly more sympathetic, they told me the OCCC doesn't take a stance and that as long as the event organizers are following all state and local laws, they defer to the organizers of each event to determine and implement their own access rules and procedures.
-
Then I emailed 11 folks with the Orange County Convention Center (it's a county government building and a public space, after all).
Though slightly more sympathetic, they told me the OCCC doesn't take a stance and that as long as the event organizers are following all state and local laws, they defer to the organizers of each event to determine and implement their own access rules and procedures.
-
Then I emailed 11 folks with the Orange County Convention Center (it's a county government building and a public space, after all).
Though slightly more sympathetic, they told me the OCCC doesn't take a stance and that as long as the event organizers are following all state and local laws, they defer to the organizers of each event to determine and implement their own access rules and procedures.
-
Then I emailed 11 folks with the Orange County Convention Center (it's a county government building and a public space, after all).
Though slightly more sympathetic, they told me the OCCC doesn't take a stance and that as long as the event organizers are following all state and local laws, they defer to the organizers of each event to determine and implement their own access rules and procedures.
-
Their response was a hysterical "It's for your safety and protection!", which came across about as disingenuous and fallacious as if they had said "Won't someone please think about the children!"
But my complaints fell on deaf ears and they essentially told me to pound sand.
-
Their response was a hysterical "It's for your safety and protection!", which came across about as disingenuous and fallacious as if they had said "Won't someone please think about the children!"
But my complaints fell on deaf ears and they essentially told me to pound sand.
-
Their response was a hysterical "It's for your safety and protection!", which came across about as disingenuous and fallacious as if they had said "Won't someone please think about the children!"
But my complaints fell on deaf ears and they essentially told me to pound sand.
-
Their response was a hysterical "It's for your safety and protection!", which came across about as disingenuous and fallacious as if they had said "Won't someone please think about the children!"
But my complaints fell on deaf ears and they essentially told me to pound sand.
-
Their response was a hysterical "It's for your safety and protection!", which came across about as disingenuous and fallacious as if they had said "Won't someone please think about the children!"
But my complaints fell on deaf ears and they essentially told me to pound sand.
-
About a year ago, I was denied entry to the Orange County Convention Center (Florida, U.S.) to watch my kiddo play in a volleyball tournament.
Their requirement was that all attendees had to upload a picture of their face or allow the tournament organizers to photograph an attendee's face upon arrival. I asked to opt out, but to no avail.
I emailed about 8 folks with the non-profit group that organized the tournament (AAUSports.org) and voiced my displeasure.
-
About a year ago, I was denied entry to the Orange County Convention Center (Florida, U.S.) to watch my kiddo play in a volleyball tournament.
Their requirement was that all attendees had to upload a picture of their face or allow the tournament organizers to photograph an attendee's face upon arrival. I asked to opt out, but to no avail.
I emailed about 8 folks with the non-profit group that organized the tournament (AAUSports.org) and voiced my displeasure.
-
About a year ago, I was denied entry to the Orange County Convention Center (Florida, U.S.) to watch my kiddo play in a volleyball tournament.
Their requirement was that all attendees had to upload a picture of their face or allow the tournament organizers to photograph an attendee's face upon arrival. I asked to opt out, but to no avail.
I emailed about 8 folks with the non-profit group that organized the tournament (AAUSports.org) and voiced my displeasure.
-
About a year ago, I was denied entry to the Orange County Convention Center (Florida, U.S.) to watch my kiddo play in a volleyball tournament.
Their requirement was that all attendees had to upload a picture of their face or allow the tournament organizers to photograph an attendee's face upon arrival. I asked to opt out, but to no avail.
I emailed about 8 folks with the non-profit group that organized the tournament (AAUSports.org) and voiced my displeasure.
-
About a year ago, I was denied entry to the Orange County Convention Center (Florida, U.S.) to watch my kiddo play in a volleyball tournament.
Their requirement was that all attendees had to upload a picture of their face or allow the tournament organizers to photograph an attendee's face upon arrival. I asked to opt out, but to no avail.
I emailed about 8 folks with the non-profit group that organized the tournament (AAUSports.org) and voiced my displeasure.
-
Как я разработал легковесный Guardrails для русского языка
В этой статье расскажу о том как я воплотил в реальность свою идею разработать легковесный prodaction guardrails. Расскажу что такое Guardrails, далее поделюсь основными компонентами lite-guardrails, его архитектурой, этапами разработки, настройкой observability, а также созданием документации по проекту. 🔥 Начинаем 🔥
-
Как я разработал легковесный Guardrails для русского языка
В этой статье расскажу о том как я воплотил в реальность свою идею разработать легковесный prodaction guardrails. Расскажу что такое Guardrails, далее поделюсь основными компонентами lite-guardrails, его архитектурой, этапами разработки, настройкой observability, а также созданием документации по проекту. 🔥 Начинаем 🔥
-
Как я разработал легковесный Guardrails для русского языка
В этой статье расскажу о том как я воплотил в реальность свою идею разработать легковесный prodaction guardrails. Расскажу что такое Guardrails, далее поделюсь основными компонентами lite-guardrails, его архитектурой, этапами разработки, настройкой observability, а также созданием документации по проекту. 🔥 Начинаем 🔥
-
📢 Medtronic notifie ses clients après une violation de données revendiquée par ShinyHunters
📝 ## 🏥 ContexteSource : BleepingComputer, publié le 2 juillet 2026.
📖 cyberveille : https://cyberveille.ch/posts/2026-07-03-medtronic-notifie-ses-clients-apres-une-violation-de-donnees-revendiquee-par-shinyhunters/
🌐 source : https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/medtronic-notifies-customers-impacted-by-shinyhunters-data-breach/
#PII #ShinyHunters #Cyberveille -
@geerlingguy this paints the consumer more as a victim, maybe the real corp overeach is admitting they are basically proxies for gov't surveillance - willing profiteers, maybe almost as bad as the ai industry
#red shirt harms and impacts #tort law #ip #pii #license #osint #data brokers #secret america #who's who in americaBright Data (formerly Luminati Networks) is a global technology company that offers web data collection and proxy services.
-
@geerlingguy this paints the consumer more as a victim, maybe the real corp overeach is admitting they are basically proxies for gov't surveillance - willing profiteers, maybe almost as bad as the ai industry
#red shirt harms and impacts #tort law #ip #pii #license #osint #data brokers #secret america #who's who in americaBright Data (formerly Luminati Networks) is a global technology company that offers web data collection and proxy services.