#biggovt — Public Fediverse posts

BREAKING! The White House Attempted To Rescind This E-mail. | Candace Ep 338

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FS1tUeSfdE

Big break in Tyler Robinson case

April Jobs Report Shows 115,000 Gains, Federal Govt Employment Drops Another -9,000

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has released the April jobs report showing 115,000 jobs gained [DATA HERE]. Inside the numbers, federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent since the 2024 election.

The March report was also revised upward from 178,000 to 185,000.  The overall jobs gain was double what most ‘experts’ and economic pundits had expected.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

link

April Jobs Report Shows 115,000 Gains, Federal Govt Employment Drops Another -9,000

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has released the April jobs report showing 115,000 jobs gained [DATA HERE]. Inside the numbers, federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent since the 2024 election.

The March report was also revised upward from 178,000 to 185,000.  The overall jobs gain was double what most ‘experts’ and economic pundits had expected.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

link

April Jobs Report Shows 115,000 Gains, Federal Govt Employment Drops Another -9,000

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has released the April jobs report showing 115,000 jobs gained [DATA HERE]. Inside the numbers, federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent since the 2024 election.

The March report was also revised upward from 178,000 to 185,000.  The overall jobs gain was double what most ‘experts’ and economic pundits had expected.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

link

April Jobs Report Shows 115,000 Gains, Federal Govt Employment Drops Another -9,000

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has released the April jobs report showing 115,000 jobs gained [DATA HERE]. Inside the numbers, federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent since the 2024 election.

The March report was also revised upward from 178,000 to 185,000.  The overall jobs gain was double what most ‘experts’ and economic pundits had expected.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

link

Pentagon Releases Newly Declassified Files on UFOs and UAPs, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena

Specifically, because I follow the networks of the U.S. intelligence community and how they intersect with political objectives and interests of the U.S. government, I would be remiss if I did not point out that next month a Hollywood production by Stephen Spielberg is being released.

The Spielberg movie is called “Disclosure Day,” and the plot of the movie is the U.S. government informing the American people that alternative life systems, essentially alien entities, exist in our universe.  Perhaps it is a coincidental data point, perhaps not.  It is, however, a data point. You can decide if the two releases are related.

Today the Dept of War releases declassified files highlighting Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).  The FILES ARE HERE. The files contain videos, images and witness statements.

link

__________

A universe teeming with other worlds, realms and dimensions is a significant part of Buddhism. No Buddhist should be alarmed by evidence of other forms of sentience. Most of us, I suspect, will enjoy learning the government possesses proof of alien life, or even interdimensional life functioning right now on planet earth. What they actually reveal and how believable or censored it is, is another story. ABN

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Why the vitamin K injection at birth is misguided — Dr Colleen Huber

This article is misleading and is dangerous to infants.

It ignores the hazards of injecting newborns with toxins such as propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, benzyl alcohol and highly neurotoxic aluminum in vitamin K shots given hours after birth.

It fails to acknowledge the high vitamin K in colostrum, available to infants as soon as born, the earliest breast milk.

It fails to acknowledge much safer vitamin K orally to the mother within the days before birth.

Blood needs to be thinner at birth, and cord-cutting needs to be delayed a few minutes so blood shunted back to the placenta in birth canal can return to the infant with the infant’s own stem cells for lifelong benefit.

But pharma-allied Pro Publica hides all that in their shameful and dangerous propaganda piece, because there is huge $$ for stealing cord blood and placenta from mother and baby, to sell for profit to the “anti-aging” industry.

link

Seattle Statement on Glyphosate and Public Health

This statement was finalized and adopted at the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium, which took place 25-26 March, 2026 in Seattle, Washington. The statement’s authors are listed below.

Glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide (plant killer) typically marketed as Roundup, is the world’s most widely used pesticide. The diversity and magnitude of glyphosate uses in agriculture, in forestry and in industrial, commercial, residential and municipal settings have grown dramatically since first approval in 1974. 

Humans are exposed to glyphosate through direct spraying and other skin contact, through occupational or residential proximity to sprayed areas, through exposure to dust and through consumption of food and water contaminated with glyphosate residues. Food is the main route of exposure for most people while occupational exposures are typically the highest.

National and international biomonitoring surveys detect glyphosate in samples collected from 70-80% of all people examined, including children.

Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) harm human health and can cause cancer. The comprehensive evidence supports this conclusion, with the strongest epidemiological evidence linking exposure to increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system.

There is additional evidence from human and/or animal studies that glyphosate and GBHs increase the risk of multiple adverse health effects in addition to cancer, including diseases of the kidney and liver, and impacts to the reproductive, endocrine, neurological, and other metabolic systems. Children, infants and fetuses are the most susceptible. 

Further strong evidence finds that glyphosate and GBHs cause genetic damage, oxidative stress, and hormonal disruption — biological changes that can set disease in motion. Our understanding of glyphosate’s ability to cause these changes has developed from multiple lines of evidence in animal, human and in vitro studies.

Additional research is needed to better understand the full extent of glyphosate’s and GBH’s effects on human health and the underlying mechanisms involved, such as epigenetic alterations, microbiome disruption and endocrine effects. 

The evidence that glyphosate and GBHs harm human health at levels of current use is now so strong that no additional delays in regulation of glyphosate can be justified. Regulatory agencies in countries around the world should treat glyphosate and GBHs as hazardous, as some countries have started to do. Agencies should act without further delay to limit their use, or eliminate them if legally required, to protect public health. 

Preventive measures to reduce human exposures while handling and applying glyphosate are accessible, proven effective, and inexpensive. These actions should be implemented without delay while research continues.

Safeguards must be implemented to ensure that any reduction in glyphosate use does not result in regrettable increases in the use of other equally or more harmful pesticides, for example paraquat. 

Glyphosate is not the only pesticide that has been inadequately evaluated or regulated. The approval processes globally for all existing and new pesticides are weak and fail to protect human health, especially the health of infants and children. This system needs to be fundamentally revised. Regulatory agencies need to make pesticide approval decisions based on a more comprehensive and unbiased suite of health effects data. If pesticide use is approved, these agencies must closely monitor use, exposure data and harmful outcomes, especially for susceptible and highly exposed groups. The costs of obtaining such data must be borne by the pesticide industry, but the testing must be conducted by laboratories and organizations independent of the pesticide industry and free from financial conflicts of interest (COI), defined as funding from industries and trade associations that have a financial stake in the outcome.

Risk-assessment methods and processes used to evaluate pesticides must be updated to use best-available science, including: using transparent, consistent and unbiased approaches to evaluate all the evidence; accounting for human variability and susceptible populations such as fetuses, infants and children, and highly exposed populations such as farmworkers; accounting for cumulative exposures and risks for pesticides that contribute to common adverse health outcomes; and identifying adverse health effects and risks at all exposure levels. This is clearly not the case now.

All scientific evidence used in pesticide evaluations must be publicly available, not labeled proprietary or restricted to active ingredients, and must comply with laws protecting human subjects in research. Financial COI, which do not include government funding, must be addressed throughout the research and regulatory processes, including accounting for bias from industry-funded studies, and ensuring that individuals with financial COI are barred from participating in scientific advisory panels and other bodies that formally review scientific data.

Ultimately, pesticide use must be reduced overall, and eliminated to the extent possible. This is consistent with the United Nations Global Biodiversity Framework global target to reduce pesticide risks by 50% by 2030 relative to 2010–2020 and replace pesticides with safer, more sustainable pest control systems that rely more on prevention than treatment. This is imperative for the health of humans, ecosystems and future generations.

link

Signed by (Affiliations noted for identification purposes only)

Lianne Sheppard, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Nathan Donley, PhD
Center for Biological Diversity, Olympia, Washington

Cynthia Curl, MS, PhD
School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho

Luoping Zhang, PhD, MS
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California

Rashmi Joglekar, PhD
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Kurt Straif, MD, PhD
Boston College, Massachusetts, and ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain

Audrey E. Tran Lam, MPH
Center for Energy & Environmental Education, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa

Dr. Lee A. Evslin, MD, FAAP
Hawaii Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Kapaa, Hawaii

Alice Livingston-Ortolani, PhD
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

Brenda Eskenazi, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Peter Clausing, PhD
Pesticide Action Network, Germany

Maryse F. Bouchard, PhD
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Montréal, Canada

Robin Mesnage, PhD
King’s College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Germany

Naomi Oreskes, PhD
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Grant Hopkins
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Robert Gunier, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Naila Khalil, MBBS, MPH, PhD
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

Amanda Claire Starbuck, MA
Food & Water Watch, Longmont, Colorado

Johann Zaller, PhD
BOKU University, Institute of Zoology, Vienna, Austria

Dr. Janet Perlman, MD, MPH, FAAP
University of California at San Francisco, Berkeley, California

Dr. Eve Shapiro, MD, MPH
Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Tucson, Arizona

Dr. Dianne Glover, MD
Providence/Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Sun-Young Kim, PhD
National Cancer Center of Korea, Goyang, Korea

Muhammad Zahid, PhD, MPH
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Andrew Smith, PhD
Chief Scientific Officer, Rodale Institute, Kutztown, Pennsylvania

Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, MD, MSc, FAAP
Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts

Christopher J. Portier, PhD
Former Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Former Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Former Associate Director, National Toxicology Program, Thune, Switzerland

Dr. Daniele Mandrioli, MD, PhD
Secretary General, Collegium Ramazzini, Bologna, Italy

Dr. Bruce Lanphear, MD, MPH
Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

Charles Benbrook, PhD
Benbrook Consulting Services, Lakeville, Maine

Dr. Beate Ritz, MD, PhD, FSPH
University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Alexandra Muñoz, MS, PhD
Independent Toxicologist, Miami, Florida

Anne Riederer, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Jennifer Fung, PhD
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Catherine Hong
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Karie L. Knoke
Benbrook Consulting Service, Sandpoint, Idaho

Dr. Dennis D. Weisenburger, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Alexander A. Kaurov, PhD
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Kelly Ryerson, MBA
American Regeneration, Miami, Florida

Yogi Hendlin, PhD
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Melinda Hemmelgarn, MS, RD
Beyond Pesticides, Columbia, Missouri

Kendra Klein, PhD
Friends of the Earth, Washington D.C.

Erik Millstone, PhD
Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, England, United Kingdom

Noreen Mucha, MPA
Wisconsin Organics, Waukesha, Wisconsin

Dr. Kambria Beck Holder, MD
Family Physician, Kilauea, Hawaii

Dr. Stephanie Blount, MD
Pediatrician, West Palm Beach, Florida

Carsten A. Brühl, PhD
Technical University Kaiserslautern – Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Landau, Germany

Dr. Ana M. Mora, MD, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Dr. Michael W. Schwartz, MD
Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Seattle Statement on Glyphosate and Public Health

This statement was finalized and adopted at the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium, which took place 25-26 March, 2026 in Seattle, Washington. The statement’s authors are listed below.

Glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide (plant killer) typically marketed as Roundup, is the world’s most widely used pesticide. The diversity and magnitude of glyphosate uses in agriculture, in forestry and in industrial, commercial, residential and municipal settings have grown dramatically since first approval in 1974. 

Humans are exposed to glyphosate through direct spraying and other skin contact, through occupational or residential proximity to sprayed areas, through exposure to dust and through consumption of food and water contaminated with glyphosate residues. Food is the main route of exposure for most people while occupational exposures are typically the highest.

National and international biomonitoring surveys detect glyphosate in samples collected from 70-80% of all people examined, including children.

Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) harm human health and can cause cancer. The comprehensive evidence supports this conclusion, with the strongest epidemiological evidence linking exposure to increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system.

There is additional evidence from human and/or animal studies that glyphosate and GBHs increase the risk of multiple adverse health effects in addition to cancer, including diseases of the kidney and liver, and impacts to the reproductive, endocrine, neurological, and other metabolic systems. Children, infants and fetuses are the most susceptible. 

Further strong evidence finds that glyphosate and GBHs cause genetic damage, oxidative stress, and hormonal disruption — biological changes that can set disease in motion. Our understanding of glyphosate’s ability to cause these changes has developed from multiple lines of evidence in animal, human and in vitro studies.

Additional research is needed to better understand the full extent of glyphosate’s and GBH’s effects on human health and the underlying mechanisms involved, such as epigenetic alterations, microbiome disruption and endocrine effects. 

The evidence that glyphosate and GBHs harm human health at levels of current use is now so strong that no additional delays in regulation of glyphosate can be justified. Regulatory agencies in countries around the world should treat glyphosate and GBHs as hazardous, as some countries have started to do. Agencies should act without further delay to limit their use, or eliminate them if legally required, to protect public health. 

Preventive measures to reduce human exposures while handling and applying glyphosate are accessible, proven effective, and inexpensive. These actions should be implemented without delay while research continues.

Safeguards must be implemented to ensure that any reduction in glyphosate use does not result in regrettable increases in the use of other equally or more harmful pesticides, for example paraquat. 

Glyphosate is not the only pesticide that has been inadequately evaluated or regulated. The approval processes globally for all existing and new pesticides are weak and fail to protect human health, especially the health of infants and children. This system needs to be fundamentally revised. Regulatory agencies need to make pesticide approval decisions based on a more comprehensive and unbiased suite of health effects data. If pesticide use is approved, these agencies must closely monitor use, exposure data and harmful outcomes, especially for susceptible and highly exposed groups. The costs of obtaining such data must be borne by the pesticide industry, but the testing must be conducted by laboratories and organizations independent of the pesticide industry and free from financial conflicts of interest (COI), defined as funding from industries and trade associations that have a financial stake in the outcome.

Risk-assessment methods and processes used to evaluate pesticides must be updated to use best-available science, including: using transparent, consistent and unbiased approaches to evaluate all the evidence; accounting for human variability and susceptible populations such as fetuses, infants and children, and highly exposed populations such as farmworkers; accounting for cumulative exposures and risks for pesticides that contribute to common adverse health outcomes; and identifying adverse health effects and risks at all exposure levels. This is clearly not the case now.

All scientific evidence used in pesticide evaluations must be publicly available, not labeled proprietary or restricted to active ingredients, and must comply with laws protecting human subjects in research. Financial COI, which do not include government funding, must be addressed throughout the research and regulatory processes, including accounting for bias from industry-funded studies, and ensuring that individuals with financial COI are barred from participating in scientific advisory panels and other bodies that formally review scientific data.

Ultimately, pesticide use must be reduced overall, and eliminated to the extent possible. This is consistent with the United Nations Global Biodiversity Framework global target to reduce pesticide risks by 50% by 2030 relative to 2010–2020 and replace pesticides with safer, more sustainable pest control systems that rely more on prevention than treatment. This is imperative for the health of humans, ecosystems and future generations.

link

Signed by (Affiliations noted for identification purposes only)

Lianne Sheppard, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Nathan Donley, PhD
Center for Biological Diversity, Olympia, Washington

Cynthia Curl, MS, PhD
School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho

Luoping Zhang, PhD, MS
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California

Rashmi Joglekar, PhD
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Kurt Straif, MD, PhD
Boston College, Massachusetts, and ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain

Audrey E. Tran Lam, MPH
Center for Energy & Environmental Education, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa

Dr. Lee A. Evslin, MD, FAAP
Hawaii Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Kapaa, Hawaii

Alice Livingston-Ortolani, PhD
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

Brenda Eskenazi, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Peter Clausing, PhD
Pesticide Action Network, Germany

Maryse F. Bouchard, PhD
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Montréal, Canada

Robin Mesnage, PhD
King’s College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Germany

Naomi Oreskes, PhD
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Grant Hopkins
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Robert Gunier, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Naila Khalil, MBBS, MPH, PhD
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

Amanda Claire Starbuck, MA
Food & Water Watch, Longmont, Colorado

Johann Zaller, PhD
BOKU University, Institute of Zoology, Vienna, Austria

Dr. Janet Perlman, MD, MPH, FAAP
University of California at San Francisco, Berkeley, California

Dr. Eve Shapiro, MD, MPH
Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Tucson, Arizona

Dr. Dianne Glover, MD
Providence/Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Sun-Young Kim, PhD
National Cancer Center of Korea, Goyang, Korea

Muhammad Zahid, PhD, MPH
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Andrew Smith, PhD
Chief Scientific Officer, Rodale Institute, Kutztown, Pennsylvania

Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, MD, MSc, FAAP
Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts

Christopher J. Portier, PhD
Former Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Former Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Former Associate Director, National Toxicology Program, Thune, Switzerland

Dr. Daniele Mandrioli, MD, PhD
Secretary General, Collegium Ramazzini, Bologna, Italy

Dr. Bruce Lanphear, MD, MPH
Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

Charles Benbrook, PhD
Benbrook Consulting Services, Lakeville, Maine

Dr. Beate Ritz, MD, PhD, FSPH
University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Alexandra Muñoz, MS, PhD
Independent Toxicologist, Miami, Florida

Anne Riederer, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Jennifer Fung, PhD
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Catherine Hong
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Karie L. Knoke
Benbrook Consulting Service, Sandpoint, Idaho

Dr. Dennis D. Weisenburger, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Alexander A. Kaurov, PhD
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Kelly Ryerson, MBA
American Regeneration, Miami, Florida

Yogi Hendlin, PhD
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Melinda Hemmelgarn, MS, RD
Beyond Pesticides, Columbia, Missouri

Kendra Klein, PhD
Friends of the Earth, Washington D.C.

Erik Millstone, PhD
Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, England, United Kingdom

Noreen Mucha, MPA
Wisconsin Organics, Waukesha, Wisconsin

Dr. Kambria Beck Holder, MD
Family Physician, Kilauea, Hawaii

Dr. Stephanie Blount, MD
Pediatrician, West Palm Beach, Florida

Carsten A. Brühl, PhD
Technical University Kaiserslautern – Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Landau, Germany

Dr. Ana M. Mora, MD, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Dr. Michael W. Schwartz, MD
Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Seattle Statement on Glyphosate and Public Health

This statement was finalized and adopted at the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium, which took place 25-26 March, 2026 in Seattle, Washington. The statement’s authors are listed below.

Glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide (plant killer) typically marketed as Roundup, is the world’s most widely used pesticide. The diversity and magnitude of glyphosate uses in agriculture, in forestry and in industrial, commercial, residential and municipal settings have grown dramatically since first approval in 1974. 

Humans are exposed to glyphosate through direct spraying and other skin contact, through occupational or residential proximity to sprayed areas, through exposure to dust and through consumption of food and water contaminated with glyphosate residues. Food is the main route of exposure for most people while occupational exposures are typically the highest.

National and international biomonitoring surveys detect glyphosate in samples collected from 70-80% of all people examined, including children.

Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) harm human health and can cause cancer. The comprehensive evidence supports this conclusion, with the strongest epidemiological evidence linking exposure to increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system.

There is additional evidence from human and/or animal studies that glyphosate and GBHs increase the risk of multiple adverse health effects in addition to cancer, including diseases of the kidney and liver, and impacts to the reproductive, endocrine, neurological, and other metabolic systems. Children, infants and fetuses are the most susceptible. 

Further strong evidence finds that glyphosate and GBHs cause genetic damage, oxidative stress, and hormonal disruption — biological changes that can set disease in motion. Our understanding of glyphosate’s ability to cause these changes has developed from multiple lines of evidence in animal, human and in vitro studies.

Additional research is needed to better understand the full extent of glyphosate’s and GBH’s effects on human health and the underlying mechanisms involved, such as epigenetic alterations, microbiome disruption and endocrine effects. 

The evidence that glyphosate and GBHs harm human health at levels of current use is now so strong that no additional delays in regulation of glyphosate can be justified. Regulatory agencies in countries around the world should treat glyphosate and GBHs as hazardous, as some countries have started to do. Agencies should act without further delay to limit their use, or eliminate them if legally required, to protect public health. 

Preventive measures to reduce human exposures while handling and applying glyphosate are accessible, proven effective, and inexpensive. These actions should be implemented without delay while research continues.

Safeguards must be implemented to ensure that any reduction in glyphosate use does not result in regrettable increases in the use of other equally or more harmful pesticides, for example paraquat. 

Glyphosate is not the only pesticide that has been inadequately evaluated or regulated. The approval processes globally for all existing and new pesticides are weak and fail to protect human health, especially the health of infants and children. This system needs to be fundamentally revised. Regulatory agencies need to make pesticide approval decisions based on a more comprehensive and unbiased suite of health effects data. If pesticide use is approved, these agencies must closely monitor use, exposure data and harmful outcomes, especially for susceptible and highly exposed groups. The costs of obtaining such data must be borne by the pesticide industry, but the testing must be conducted by laboratories and organizations independent of the pesticide industry and free from financial conflicts of interest (COI), defined as funding from industries and trade associations that have a financial stake in the outcome.

Risk-assessment methods and processes used to evaluate pesticides must be updated to use best-available science, including: using transparent, consistent and unbiased approaches to evaluate all the evidence; accounting for human variability and susceptible populations such as fetuses, infants and children, and highly exposed populations such as farmworkers; accounting for cumulative exposures and risks for pesticides that contribute to common adverse health outcomes; and identifying adverse health effects and risks at all exposure levels. This is clearly not the case now.

All scientific evidence used in pesticide evaluations must be publicly available, not labeled proprietary or restricted to active ingredients, and must comply with laws protecting human subjects in research. Financial COI, which do not include government funding, must be addressed throughout the research and regulatory processes, including accounting for bias from industry-funded studies, and ensuring that individuals with financial COI are barred from participating in scientific advisory panels and other bodies that formally review scientific data.

Ultimately, pesticide use must be reduced overall, and eliminated to the extent possible. This is consistent with the United Nations Global Biodiversity Framework global target to reduce pesticide risks by 50% by 2030 relative to 2010–2020 and replace pesticides with safer, more sustainable pest control systems that rely more on prevention than treatment. This is imperative for the health of humans, ecosystems and future generations.

link

Signed by (Affiliations noted for identification purposes only)

Lianne Sheppard, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Nathan Donley, PhD
Center for Biological Diversity, Olympia, Washington

Cynthia Curl, MS, PhD
School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho

Luoping Zhang, PhD, MS
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California

Rashmi Joglekar, PhD
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Kurt Straif, MD, PhD
Boston College, Massachusetts, and ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain

Audrey E. Tran Lam, MPH
Center for Energy & Environmental Education, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa

Dr. Lee A. Evslin, MD, FAAP
Hawaii Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Kapaa, Hawaii

Alice Livingston-Ortolani, PhD
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

Brenda Eskenazi, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Peter Clausing, PhD
Pesticide Action Network, Germany

Maryse F. Bouchard, PhD
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Montréal, Canada

Robin Mesnage, PhD
King’s College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Germany

Naomi Oreskes, PhD
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Grant Hopkins
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Robert Gunier, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Naila Khalil, MBBS, MPH, PhD
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

Amanda Claire Starbuck, MA
Food & Water Watch, Longmont, Colorado

Johann Zaller, PhD
BOKU University, Institute of Zoology, Vienna, Austria

Dr. Janet Perlman, MD, MPH, FAAP
University of California at San Francisco, Berkeley, California

Dr. Eve Shapiro, MD, MPH
Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Tucson, Arizona

Dr. Dianne Glover, MD
Providence/Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Sun-Young Kim, PhD
National Cancer Center of Korea, Goyang, Korea

Muhammad Zahid, PhD, MPH
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Andrew Smith, PhD
Chief Scientific Officer, Rodale Institute, Kutztown, Pennsylvania

Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, MD, MSc, FAAP
Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts

Christopher J. Portier, PhD
Former Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Former Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Former Associate Director, National Toxicology Program, Thune, Switzerland

Dr. Daniele Mandrioli, MD, PhD
Secretary General, Collegium Ramazzini, Bologna, Italy

Dr. Bruce Lanphear, MD, MPH
Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

Charles Benbrook, PhD
Benbrook Consulting Services, Lakeville, Maine

Dr. Beate Ritz, MD, PhD, FSPH
University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Alexandra Muñoz, MS, PhD
Independent Toxicologist, Miami, Florida

Anne Riederer, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Jennifer Fung, PhD
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Catherine Hong
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Karie L. Knoke
Benbrook Consulting Service, Sandpoint, Idaho

Dr. Dennis D. Weisenburger, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Alexander A. Kaurov, PhD
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Kelly Ryerson, MBA
American Regeneration, Miami, Florida

Yogi Hendlin, PhD
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Melinda Hemmelgarn, MS, RD
Beyond Pesticides, Columbia, Missouri

Kendra Klein, PhD
Friends of the Earth, Washington D.C.

Erik Millstone, PhD
Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, England, United Kingdom

Noreen Mucha, MPA
Wisconsin Organics, Waukesha, Wisconsin

Dr. Kambria Beck Holder, MD
Family Physician, Kilauea, Hawaii

Dr. Stephanie Blount, MD
Pediatrician, West Palm Beach, Florida

Carsten A. Brühl, PhD
Technical University Kaiserslautern – Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Landau, Germany

Dr. Ana M. Mora, MD, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Dr. Michael W. Schwartz, MD
Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Seattle Statement on Glyphosate and Public Health

This statement was finalized and adopted at the Seattle Glyphosate Symposium, which took place 25-26 March, 2026 in Seattle, Washington. The statement’s authors are listed below.

Glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide (plant killer) typically marketed as Roundup, is the world’s most widely used pesticide. The diversity and magnitude of glyphosate uses in agriculture, in forestry and in industrial, commercial, residential and municipal settings have grown dramatically since first approval in 1974. 

Humans are exposed to glyphosate through direct spraying and other skin contact, through occupational or residential proximity to sprayed areas, through exposure to dust and through consumption of food and water contaminated with glyphosate residues. Food is the main route of exposure for most people while occupational exposures are typically the highest.

National and international biomonitoring surveys detect glyphosate in samples collected from 70-80% of all people examined, including children.

Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) harm human health and can cause cancer. The comprehensive evidence supports this conclusion, with the strongest epidemiological evidence linking exposure to increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system.

There is additional evidence from human and/or animal studies that glyphosate and GBHs increase the risk of multiple adverse health effects in addition to cancer, including diseases of the kidney and liver, and impacts to the reproductive, endocrine, neurological, and other metabolic systems. Children, infants and fetuses are the most susceptible. 

Further strong evidence finds that glyphosate and GBHs cause genetic damage, oxidative stress, and hormonal disruption — biological changes that can set disease in motion. Our understanding of glyphosate’s ability to cause these changes has developed from multiple lines of evidence in animal, human and in vitro studies.

Additional research is needed to better understand the full extent of glyphosate’s and GBH’s effects on human health and the underlying mechanisms involved, such as epigenetic alterations, microbiome disruption and endocrine effects. 

The evidence that glyphosate and GBHs harm human health at levels of current use is now so strong that no additional delays in regulation of glyphosate can be justified. Regulatory agencies in countries around the world should treat glyphosate and GBHs as hazardous, as some countries have started to do. Agencies should act without further delay to limit their use, or eliminate them if legally required, to protect public health. 

Preventive measures to reduce human exposures while handling and applying glyphosate are accessible, proven effective, and inexpensive. These actions should be implemented without delay while research continues.

Safeguards must be implemented to ensure that any reduction in glyphosate use does not result in regrettable increases in the use of other equally or more harmful pesticides, for example paraquat. 

Glyphosate is not the only pesticide that has been inadequately evaluated or regulated. The approval processes globally for all existing and new pesticides are weak and fail to protect human health, especially the health of infants and children. This system needs to be fundamentally revised. Regulatory agencies need to make pesticide approval decisions based on a more comprehensive and unbiased suite of health effects data. If pesticide use is approved, these agencies must closely monitor use, exposure data and harmful outcomes, especially for susceptible and highly exposed groups. The costs of obtaining such data must be borne by the pesticide industry, but the testing must be conducted by laboratories and organizations independent of the pesticide industry and free from financial conflicts of interest (COI), defined as funding from industries and trade associations that have a financial stake in the outcome.

Risk-assessment methods and processes used to evaluate pesticides must be updated to use best-available science, including: using transparent, consistent and unbiased approaches to evaluate all the evidence; accounting for human variability and susceptible populations such as fetuses, infants and children, and highly exposed populations such as farmworkers; accounting for cumulative exposures and risks for pesticides that contribute to common adverse health outcomes; and identifying adverse health effects and risks at all exposure levels. This is clearly not the case now.

All scientific evidence used in pesticide evaluations must be publicly available, not labeled proprietary or restricted to active ingredients, and must comply with laws protecting human subjects in research. Financial COI, which do not include government funding, must be addressed throughout the research and regulatory processes, including accounting for bias from industry-funded studies, and ensuring that individuals with financial COI are barred from participating in scientific advisory panels and other bodies that formally review scientific data.

Ultimately, pesticide use must be reduced overall, and eliminated to the extent possible. This is consistent with the United Nations Global Biodiversity Framework global target to reduce pesticide risks by 50% by 2030 relative to 2010–2020 and replace pesticides with safer, more sustainable pest control systems that rely more on prevention than treatment. This is imperative for the health of humans, ecosystems and future generations.

link

Signed by (Affiliations noted for identification purposes only)

Lianne Sheppard, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Nathan Donley, PhD
Center for Biological Diversity, Olympia, Washington

Cynthia Curl, MS, PhD
School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho

Luoping Zhang, PhD, MS
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California

Rashmi Joglekar, PhD
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Kurt Straif, MD, PhD
Boston College, Massachusetts, and ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain

Audrey E. Tran Lam, MPH
Center for Energy & Environmental Education, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa

Dr. Lee A. Evslin, MD, FAAP
Hawaii Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Kapaa, Hawaii

Alice Livingston-Ortolani, PhD
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

Brenda Eskenazi, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Peter Clausing, PhD
Pesticide Action Network, Germany

Maryse F. Bouchard, PhD
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Montréal, Canada

Robin Mesnage, PhD
King’s College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Germany

Naomi Oreskes, PhD
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Grant Hopkins
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Robert Gunier, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Naila Khalil, MBBS, MPH, PhD
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

Amanda Claire Starbuck, MA
Food & Water Watch, Longmont, Colorado

Johann Zaller, PhD
BOKU University, Institute of Zoology, Vienna, Austria

Dr. Janet Perlman, MD, MPH, FAAP
University of California at San Francisco, Berkeley, California

Dr. Eve Shapiro, MD, MPH
Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Tucson, Arizona

Dr. Dianne Glover, MD
Providence/Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Sun-Young Kim, PhD
National Cancer Center of Korea, Goyang, Korea

Muhammad Zahid, PhD, MPH
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Andrew Smith, PhD
Chief Scientific Officer, Rodale Institute, Kutztown, Pennsylvania

Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, MD, MSc, FAAP
Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts

Christopher J. Portier, PhD
Former Director, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Former Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Former Associate Director, National Toxicology Program, Thune, Switzerland

Dr. Daniele Mandrioli, MD, PhD
Secretary General, Collegium Ramazzini, Bologna, Italy

Dr. Bruce Lanphear, MD, MPH
Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

Charles Benbrook, PhD
Benbrook Consulting Services, Lakeville, Maine

Dr. Beate Ritz, MD, PhD, FSPH
University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Alexandra Muñoz, MS, PhD
Independent Toxicologist, Miami, Florida

Anne Riederer, PhD
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Jennifer Fung, PhD
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Catherine Hong
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Karie L. Knoke
Benbrook Consulting Service, Sandpoint, Idaho

Dr. Dennis D. Weisenburger, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Alexander A. Kaurov, PhD
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Kelly Ryerson, MBA
American Regeneration, Miami, Florida

Yogi Hendlin, PhD
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Melinda Hemmelgarn, MS, RD
Beyond Pesticides, Columbia, Missouri

Kendra Klein, PhD
Friends of the Earth, Washington D.C.

Erik Millstone, PhD
Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, England, United Kingdom

Noreen Mucha, MPA
Wisconsin Organics, Waukesha, Wisconsin

Dr. Kambria Beck Holder, MD
Family Physician, Kilauea, Hawaii

Dr. Stephanie Blount, MD
Pediatrician, West Palm Beach, Florida

Carsten A. Brühl, PhD
Technical University Kaiserslautern – Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Landau, Germany

Dr. Ana M. Mora, MD, PhD
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

Dr. Michael W. Schwartz, MD
Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Medical Totalitarianism

…According to official data, there are 1.82 million practicing physicians in the EU, about four per thousand inhabitants. Including retired doctors, there are at least two million doctors, for 450 million people. In addition, there are 456,000 pharmacists working in pharmacies, 365,000 dentists, and 3.6 million nurses. Overall, there are at least seven million medical personnel, to which number should also be added thousands working in the various health ministries, in hospital administration staffs, in health insurance companies, as ambulance personnel, in the pharmaceutical industry, so that the total number of people employed in the “health industry” may be between eight million and ten million people. Add to that the number of dependents and family members, and one could say that some twenty million EU citizens depend wholly or partly on money earned in the health business. According to official figures, health care spending in the EU in 2022 was ten percent of GNP, en enormous figure, while the EU pharmaceuticals market was estimated at over 500 billion Euro in 2024.

Given those numbers, it is not very surprising that governments and business would want to make sure that physicians take the kind of decisions (i.e. make diagnoses and write prescriptions according to strict guidelines) that sustain the system and make it profitable. In a sense, the almost two million physicians are the front troops of the system. As long as they prescribe the pills and vaccinations that the pharmaceutical industry produces, the system will thrive. One could also say those almost two million doctors are drug pushers just as much as street dealers in marijuana, cocaine and fentanyl. This latter business in Europe is estimated at 30 billion Euro (2019), but this is all tax free.

In line with centralized medicine, medical students across the EU are being trained to think alike and behave like loyal members of the state-directed medical establishment. In other words, the EU medical establishment (already part of a global network controlled and managed by the WHO), functions like the Roman Catholic Church or a traditional old-style Communist Party. Medical “consensus” (imposed top-down) is for physicians what dogma is for Roman Catholic clergy and the party line for Communists. All physicians are required to adhere to medical consensus and those who don’t are made to pay for it. It means that in practice the Hippocratic oath is no more than a cute folkloric custom without content or true meaning.

link

__________

USA is very similar. Furthermore, it does appear that the totalitarian medical system has been and still is a spearhead of universal totalitarianism. The same kinds of totalitarian control are present in news media, social media algorithms, captured agencies throughout government, government itself. The human need to socialize and conform is being used against us in every example you can think of: A general rule is conjured, followed by regulations, typically lower down on the ladders of power. Then these regulations metastasize and multiply into other organizations. Then they climb and descend the ladders of power. Like all fractal processes, there are currents of control going both ways, all ways, bottom to top, top to bottom. Before long, you have elementary school teachers deciding your child’s gender in a school system that has previously ruled it is in the best interests of your child that you will not be told what is happening. Totalitarianism is maddening in its details, a telling fact that always identifies it. ABN

And there were too many in 1986

In March 2021, the FDA was warned that its VAERS analysis algorithm could hide or mask safety signals from the COVID shots. Rather than alerting the public, they covered it up

__________

It is my recollection that danger signals from vax recipients showed up even sooner than early March 2021. Without doubt, the deeply sh*tty claim that the covid vax was ‘Safe & Effective’ was a blatant lie. Based on this and other lies, let alone hiding the VAERS data, the FDA and CDC and entire medical and pharmaceutical industry should not be trusted again until after there has been a very thorough cleaning up of all of these institutions. Covid and the covid vax is but a fraction of the entire USA institutional health problem. It’s all fixable and even fairly obvious, and some progress is being made, but there is still a very long way to go. At a bare minimum citizens should demand health freedom guarantees, so the bottom line at least rests with us and not some jackass on a schoolboard, government agency, doctor’s office or hospital. ABN

In March 2021, the FDA was warned that its VAERS analysis algorithm could hide or mask safety signals from the COVID shots. Rather than alerting the public, they covered it up

__________

It is my recollection that danger signals from vax recipients showed up even sooner than early March 2021. Without doubt, the deeply sh*tty claim that the covid vax was ‘Safe & Effective’ was a blatant lie. Based on this and other lies, let alone hiding the VAERS data, the FDA and CDC and entire medical and pharmaceutical industry should not be trusted again until after there has been a very thorough cleaning up of all of these institutions. Covid and the covid vax is but a fraction of the entire USA institutional health problem. It’s all fixable and even fairly obvious, and some progress is being made, but there is still a very long way to go. At a bare minimum citizens should demand health freedom guarantees, so the bottom line at least rests with us and not some jackass on a schoolboard, government agency, doctor’s office or hospital. ABN

In March 2021, the FDA was warned that its VAERS analysis algorithm could hide or mask safety signals from the COVID shots. Rather than alerting the public, they covered it up

__________

It is my recollection that danger signals from vax recipients showed up even sooner than early March 2021. Without doubt, the claim that the covid vax is ‘Safe & Effective’ was a blatant lie. Based on this alone, the FDA, CDC and entire medical & pharmaceutical industry should not be trusted again until there has been a very thorough cleaning up of all of these institutions. Covid and the covid vax is but a fraction of the overall institutional health problem in USA. It’s all fixable and even fairly obvious, and some progress is being made, but there is still a very long way to go. At a bare minimum citizens should demand health freedom guarantees, so the bottom line at least rests with us and not some jackass on a schoolboard, government agency, doctor’s office or hospital. ABN

In March 2021, the FDA was warned that its VAERS analysis algorithm could hide or mask safety signals from the COVID shots. Rather than alerting the public, they covered it up

__________

It is my recollection that danger signals from vax recipients showed up even sooner than early March 2021. Without doubt, the deeply sh*tty claim that the covid vax was ‘Safe & Effective’ was a blatant lie. Based on this and other lies, let alone hiding the VAERS data, the FDA and CDC and entire medical and pharmaceutical industry should not be trusted again until after there has been a very thorough cleaning up of all of these institutions. Covid and the covid vax is but a fraction of the entire USA institutional health problem. It’s all fixable and even fairly obvious, and some progress is being made, but there is still a very long way to go. At a bare minimum citizens should demand health freedom guarantees, so the bottom line at least rests with us and not some jackass on a schoolboard, government agency, doctor’s office or hospital. ABN

In March 2021, the FDA was warned that its VAERS analysis algorithm could hide or mask safety signals from the COVID shots. Rather than alerting the public, they covered it up

__________

It is my recollection that danger signals from vax recipients showed up even sooner than early March 2021. Without doubt, the deeply sh*tty claim that the covid vax was ‘Safe & Effective’ was a blatant lie. Based on this and other lies, let alone hiding the VAERS data, the FDA and CDC and entire medical and pharmaceutical industry should not be trusted again until after there has been a very thorough cleaning up of all of these institutions. Covid and the covid vax is but a fraction of the entire USA institutional health problem. It’s all fixable and even fairly obvious, and some progress is being made, but there is still a very long way to go. At a bare minimum citizens should demand health freedom guarantees, so the bottom line at least rests with us and not some jackass on a schoolboard, government agency, doctor’s office or hospital. ABN

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age.

For example, pediatricians in the 3-million-person Health Net network receive a $2,500 bonus for each baby receiving 25 vaccine doses by 2.5 years of age.

A paralegal at my firm quickly found 27 additional examples of insurers and providers from across the country offering such bribes. See list below.

It is amazing that even pediatricians need to be bribed to inject these products.

How do you think this affects how pediatricians treat parents during “well-check” visits?

EXAMPLES: Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/hospital-p4p/2025/20250109%20-%20FINAL%202025%20Hospital_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdfEmpire; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/ob-p4p/2025/20250110%20-%20FINAL_2025_OB_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/p4p—urgent-care/20251215%20-%20Final_2026%20Urgent%20Care%20Guide.pdf; Partnership HealthPlan of California- https://partnershiphp.org/Providers/Quality/Documents/QIP%202025/2026PCPQIPMeasureSpecifications.pdf#:~:text=Incentives%20are%20%0Abased%20on%20meeting%20specific%20performance%20thresholds%20in%20measures%20that%20address%20the%20above%20areas; Passport by Molina Healthcare- https://molinamarketplace.com/members/nv/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/ky/en-us/Medicaid/2026VaccineVABFlyer_R.ashx; Eastern Oregon Coordinated Care Organization (EOCCO)- https://eocco.com/news/Current/Childhood-Immunization-Incentive-Program; Central California Alliance for Health- https://thealliance.health/wp-content/uploads/2026-Care-Based-Incentive-CBI-workbook.pdf; California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS)- https://dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/CY-2025-Quality-Withhold-and-Incentive-Methodology-Document.pdf; Blue Shield of California- https://blueshieldca.com/content/dam/bsca/en/provider/docs/2023/June/PRV_Primary-Care-Fee-For-Service-Plus-Program-Overview.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/Flu-Incentive-Flyer_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Provider%20Forms/PCP-Incentive-Program.pdf; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Healthy-Child-Immunization-Incentive.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/2026-Molina-Member-Rewards-Flyer_Child_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; New Jersey Department of Health – https://nj.gov/health/cd/documents/imm_requirements/hot_shots_welcome_packet.pdf; Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey / New Jersey Department of Health- https://eastamwelltownship.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/1227?fileID=20313; Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina (Healthy Blue)- https://healthybluenc.com/medicaid/extras/healthy-rewards; AmeriHealth Caritas North Carolina- https://amerihealthcaritasnc.com/member/benefits/carecard; Carolina Complete Health- https://carolinacompletehealth.com/members/medicaid/benefits-services/healthy-rewards-program.html; Aetna Better Health of Illinois- https://aetnabetterhealth.com/illinois-medicaid/rewards-program.html; APhA Foundation/American Pharmacists Association- https://aphafoundation.org/post/apha-foundation-announces-2025-2026-incentive-grant-recipients; Kern Health Systems- https://res.cloudinary.com/dpmykpsih/image/upload/kern-site-353/media/011c263f1fc54936a1daad22bc376243/p4p_2026-binder_final-12026.pdf; Oklahoma Complete Health- https://oklahomacompletehealth.com/providers/quality-improvement/participation-in-qi-.html#:~:text=Childhood%20Immunization%20Status%20%28PDF%29%0A%0AImmunizations%20for%20Adolescents%20%28PDF%29; Setra Health Plans- https://sentarahealthplans.com/en/members/medicaid/earning-your-medicaid-member-incentives#:~:text=The%20Healthy%20Incentives%20Program%20rewards%20you%20with%20up%20to%20%2450%20in%20gift%20cards%20per%20year%20for%20completing%20certain%20wellness%20exams%20and%20services; AmeriHealth Caritas- https://p1.amerihealthcaritasdc.com/content/dam/amerihealth-caritas/acdc/pdf/provider/forms/2025/2025-provider-incentive-cpt-code-campaign-child-immunization-status.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf; Health Net (Health Net of California, Inc. / Health Net Community Solutions, Inc.)-https://providerlibrary.healthnetcalifornia.com/news/26-367-earn–2-500-for-closing-cis-10-immunization-care-gaps–my.html; Peach State Health Pla- https://pshpgeorgia.com/content/dam/centene/peachstate/pdfs/2026%20Medicaid%20P4P%20Incentive%20PPT_FINAL_R.pdf

link

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age — Aaron Siri

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age.

For example, pediatricians in the 3-million-person Health Net network receive a $2,500 bonus for each baby receiving 25 vaccine doses by 2.5 years of age.

A paralegal at my firm quickly found 27 additional examples of insurers and providers from across the country offering such bribes. See list below.

It is amazing that even pediatricians need to be bribed to inject these products.

How do you think this affects how pediatricians treat parents during “well-check” visits?

EXAMPLES: Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/hospital-p4p/2025/20250109%20-%20FINAL%202025%20Hospital_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdfEmpire; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/ob-p4p/2025/20250110%20-%20FINAL_2025_OB_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/p4p—urgent-care/20251215%20-%20Final_2026%20Urgent%20Care%20Guide.pdf; Partnership HealthPlan of California- https://partnershiphp.org/Providers/Quality/Documents/QIP%202025/2026PCPQIPMeasureSpecifications.pdf#:~:text=Incentives%20are%20%0Abased%20on%20meeting%20specific%20performance%20thresholds%20in%20measures%20that%20address%20the%20above%20areas; Passport by Molina Healthcare- https://molinamarketplace.com/members/nv/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/ky/en-us/Medicaid/2026VaccineVABFlyer_R.ashx; Eastern Oregon Coordinated Care Organization (EOCCO)- https://eocco.com/news/Current/Childhood-Immunization-Incentive-Program; Central California Alliance for Health- https://thealliance.health/wp-content/uploads/2026-Care-Based-Incentive-CBI-workbook.pdf; California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS)- https://dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/CY-2025-Quality-Withhold-and-Incentive-Methodology-Document.pdf; Blue Shield of California- https://blueshieldca.com/content/dam/bsca/en/provider/docs/2023/June/PRV_Primary-Care-Fee-For-Service-Plus-Program-Overview.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/Flu-Incentive-Flyer_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Provider%20Forms/PCP-Incentive-Program.pdf; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Healthy-Child-Immunization-Incentive.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/2026-Molina-Member-Rewards-Flyer_Child_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; New Jersey Department of Health – https://nj.gov/health/cd/documents/imm_requirements/hot_shots_welcome_packet.pdf; Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey / New Jersey Department of Health- https://eastamwelltownship.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/1227?fileID=20313; Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina (Healthy Blue)- https://healthybluenc.com/medicaid/extras/healthy-rewards; AmeriHealth Caritas North Carolina- https://amerihealthcaritasnc.com/member/benefits/carecard; Carolina Complete Health- https://carolinacompletehealth.com/members/medicaid/benefits-services/healthy-rewards-program.html; Aetna Better Health of Illinois- https://aetnabetterhealth.com/illinois-medicaid/rewards-program.html; APhA Foundation/American Pharmacists Association- https://aphafoundation.org/post/apha-foundation-announces-2025-2026-incentive-grant-recipients; Kern Health Systems- https://res.cloudinary.com/dpmykpsih/image/upload/kern-site-353/media/011c263f1fc54936a1daad22bc376243/p4p_2026-binder_final-12026.pdf; Oklahoma Complete Health- https://oklahomacompletehealth.com/providers/quality-improvement/participation-in-qi-.html#:~:text=Childhood%20Immunization%20Status%20%28PDF%29%0A%0AImmunizations%20for%20Adolescents%20%28PDF%29; Setra Health Plans- https://sentarahealthplans.com/en/members/medicaid/earning-your-medicaid-member-incentives#:~:text=The%20Healthy%20Incentives%20Program%20rewards%20you%20with%20up%20to%20%2450%20in%20gift%20cards%20per%20year%20for%20completing%20certain%20wellness%20exams%20and%20services; AmeriHealth Caritas- https://p1.amerihealthcaritasdc.com/content/dam/amerihealth-caritas/acdc/pdf/provider/forms/2025/2025-provider-incentive-cpt-code-campaign-child-immunization-status.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf; Health Net (Health Net of California, Inc. / Health Net Community Solutions, Inc.)-https://providerlibrary.healthnetcalifornia.com/news/26-367-earn–2-500-for-closing-cis-10-immunization-care-gaps–my.html; Peach State Health Pla- https://pshpgeorgia.com/content/dam/centene/peachstate/pdfs/2026%20Medicaid%20P4P%20Incentive%20PPT_FINAL_R.pdf

link

__________

UPDATE: A typical rebuttal of the claim that health insurers are bribing doctors to vax as many children as possible is that insurers are acting in the children’s best interest; and this is solidly proved because mass vaxxing is also in the insurers best interest. The claim is that by vaccinating as many children as they can, insurers are keeping them healthy while also saving money themselves as insurers will be required to pay fewer claims for healthier children. This rebuttal is completely false and based on a misunderstanding of how insurance works. Insurers make more money the sicker their customers are. Here’s why that is so. Under Obamacare, insurers are given 20% of covered medical expenses to manage their part of the system. In any one year, insurers do try to minimize their payouts. And this is where the misunderstanding or deliberate fraud in the rebuttal lies. In any one year, insurers always minimize payouts on established policies. But over more than one year, insurers always make more money the more medical costs go up. Under Obamacare 20% of $100 dollars of medical expenses is $20. If costs go up 10x, 20% of $1,000 is $200. The amount of work for insurers to manage those costs is the same. So, it is always in insurers’ best interests for medical costs go up over the years and not down. ABN

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age

Health insurers and organizations literally bribe pediatricians to give your baby 25 vaccine doses before 3 years of age.

For example, pediatricians in the 3-million-person Health Net network receive a $2,500 bonus for each baby receiving 25 vaccine doses by 2.5 years of age.

A paralegal at my firm quickly found 27 additional examples of insurers and providers from across the country offering such bribes. See list below.

It is amazing that even pediatricians need to be bribed to inject these products.

How do you think this affects how pediatricians treat parents during “well-check” visits?

EXAMPLES: Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/hospital-p4p/2025/20250109%20-%20FINAL%202025%20Hospital_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdfEmpire; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Health Plan (IEHP)-https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/ob-p4p/2025/20250110%20-%20FINAL_2025_OB_P4P_Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/global-quality-program/2026/20260413%20-%20Final%202026%20Global%20Quality%20P4P%20PCP%20Program%20Guide.pdf; Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP)- https://providerservices.iehp.org/content/dam/provider-services-rd/en/documents/providers/p4p–prop-56–gemt/p4p—urgent-care/20251215%20-%20Final_2026%20Urgent%20Care%20Guide.pdf; Partnership HealthPlan of California- https://partnershiphp.org/Providers/Quality/Documents/QIP%202025/2026PCPQIPMeasureSpecifications.pdf#:~:text=Incentives%20are%20%0Abased%20on%20meeting%20specific%20performance%20thresholds%20in%20measures%20that%20address%20the%20above%20areas; Passport by Molina Healthcare- https://molinamarketplace.com/members/nv/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/ky/en-us/Medicaid/2026VaccineVABFlyer_R.ashx; Eastern Oregon Coordinated Care Organization (EOCCO)- https://eocco.com/news/Current/Childhood-Immunization-Incentive-Program; Central California Alliance for Health- https://thealliance.health/wp-content/uploads/2026-Care-Based-Incentive-CBI-workbook.pdf; California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS)- https://dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/CY-2025-Quality-Withhold-and-Incentive-Methodology-Document.pdf; Blue Shield of California- https://blueshieldca.com/content/dam/bsca/en/provider/docs/2023/June/PRV_Primary-Care-Fee-For-Service-Plus-Program-Overview.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/Flu-Incentive-Flyer_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Provider%20Forms/PCP-Incentive-Program.pdf; McLaren Health Plan- https://mclarenhealthplan.org/Uploads/Public/Documents/HealthPlan/documents/Healthy-Child-Immunization-Incentive.pdf; Molina Healthcare (Apple Health / Medicaid)- https://molinahealthcare.com/members/wa/en-us/-/media/Molina/PublicWebsite/PDF/members/wa/en-us/Medicaid/Member-Rewards-Program/2026-Molina-Member-Rewards-Flyer_Child_EN_FNL_R_508c.ashx; New Jersey Department of Health – https://nj.gov/health/cd/documents/imm_requirements/hot_shots_welcome_packet.pdf; Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey / New Jersey Department of Health- https://eastamwelltownship.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/1227?fileID=20313; Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina (Healthy Blue)- https://healthybluenc.com/medicaid/extras/healthy-rewards; AmeriHealth Caritas North Carolina- https://amerihealthcaritasnc.com/member/benefits/carecard; Carolina Complete Health- https://carolinacompletehealth.com/members/medicaid/benefits-services/healthy-rewards-program.html; Aetna Better Health of Illinois- https://aetnabetterhealth.com/illinois-medicaid/rewards-program.html; APhA Foundation/American Pharmacists Association- https://aphafoundation.org/post/apha-foundation-announces-2025-2026-incentive-grant-recipients; Kern Health Systems- https://res.cloudinary.com/dpmykpsih/image/upload/kern-site-353/media/011c263f1fc54936a1daad22bc376243/p4p_2026-binder_final-12026.pdf; Oklahoma Complete Health- https://oklahomacompletehealth.com/providers/quality-improvement/participation-in-qi-.html#:~:text=Childhood%20Immunization%20Status%20%28PDF%29%0A%0AImmunizations%20for%20Adolescents%20%28PDF%29; Setra Health Plans- https://sentarahealthplans.com/en/members/medicaid/earning-your-medicaid-member-incentives#:~:text=The%20Healthy%20Incentives%20Program%20rewards%20you%20with%20up%20to%20%2450%20in%20gift%20cards%20per%20year%20for%20completing%20certain%20wellness%20exams%20and%20services; AmeriHealth Caritas- https://p1.amerihealthcaritasdc.com/content/dam/amerihealth-caritas/acdc/pdf/provider/forms/2025/2025-provider-incentive-cpt-code-campaign-child-immunization-status.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf; Health Net (Health Net of California, Inc. / Health Net Community Solutions, Inc.)-https://providerlibrary.healthnetcalifornia.com/news/26-367-earn–2-500-for-closing-cis-10-immunization-care-gaps–my.html; Peach State Health Pla- https://pshpgeorgia.com/content/dam/centene/peachstate/pdfs/2026%20Medicaid%20P4P%20Incentive%20PPT_FINAL_R.pdf

link

Same Law Firm Harpole Uses AGAINST Candace Employs Ben Shapiro’s Brother-in-Law & Is OWNED By Trump DOJ Insider — Project Constitution

BOMBSHELL: Same Law Firm Harpole Uses AGAINST Candace Employs Ben Shapiro’s Brother-in-Law & Is OWNED By Trump DOJ Insider!

The rabbit hole just got a lot deeper. If you were wondering why Brian Harpole’s lawsuit against Candace Owens felt like a coordinated strike, the legal “family tree” behind it tells the whole story.

1. The DOJ Connection: Brian Harpole’s lead attorney, Zachary Stoner, works for the Dhillon Law Group. The firm’s founder, Harmeet Dhillon, is currently serving as President Trump’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the DOJ. While she is officially on leave from the firm, her influence is everywhere—especially as she advocates for stricter “Anti-Semitism” speech laws that many fear will be used to silence journalists like Candace.

2. The Daily Wire Connection: As Candace revealed tonight, this is the EXACT same law firm that represented The Daily Wire during their brutal, two-year arbitration battle against her. They know her, they’ve fought her before, and they are back for more.

3. The “In-Law” Bombshell: This is where it gets personal. Dhillon Law Group didn’t just stop at representing the Daily Wire—they also hired Jacob Roth (

@RothThePatriot). Who is he? An Orthodox Jewish attorney at Dhillon Law specializing in “civil rights.”

The Shapiro Tie: He is Ben Shapiro’s brother-in-law, married to Ben’s sister, Abby Shapiro (

@ClassicallyAbby).

It looks like a classic ATTACK BY PROXY.

link

Health Freedom Defense Fund: ‘Your voice matters more than you can imagine’

Leah Wilson just said the quiet part out loud:

“Health freedom is the largest, strongest single issue voting bloc in America today.”

“We are America’s new majority.”

“We are independent from any party.”

“And we are stronger than ever.”

She declared that Bayer-Monsanto’s push for a pesticide liability shield is “exactly what happened in 1986 when Congress gave a liability shield to vaccine makers.”

“It was a bad use of tort reform then, and it’s a bad use with pesticides today.”

“So let the record show, just like we did in 2024, we’re gonna show up and decide the elections in 2026.”

“Your voice matters more than you can imagine.”

“And it’s about to matter even more in the 2026 midterm elections.”

link

CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of top COVID officials has officially begun

CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of top COVID officials has officially begun.

Fauci’s top advisor was the first domino.

Criminal referral requests have already been filed against Anthony Fauci and other officials in SEVEN states — Accused of MURDER, TERRORISM, RACKETEERING, FRAUD, & more.

link

EXCLUSIVE AUDIO! Tyler Robinson’s Grandfather Regarding His Rifle. | Candace Ep 327

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaWtDuoY_ns

Dubious Tyler Robinson hearing discussed

On Friday, I attended Charlie Kirk’s case hearing. There’s a lot to unpack from what happened, and I break it all down in this episode with @danksterintel and @brandisiciliani I may be wrong, but my sense is that this case won’t make it to trial. I think a deal will be reached before proceedings even begin.

The FBI has not produced certain evidence the defense requested. While they may technically have the right to withhold it at this stage, it raises questions. The FBI director has publicly stated that he wants this case to move quickly and smoothly and Erika has also emphasized the importance of a speedy trial. If that’s truly the goal, then why leave any opening for the defense to argue they don’t have the evidence they need and request a continuance? There were several things in this hearing that were conducted poorly.

Full video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epviMLCHXew

__________

Sixth Amendment of theConstitution of the United States

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

It is important for everyone to understand that the right to speedy trial is Tyler Robinson’s right, not Erika’s. And this Sixth Amendment right of Tyler’s does not permit the prosecution to withhold evidence or speedily convict someone who looks to many like a patsy. ABN

The UFO Question and the Missing Physicists

In a recent episode of the American Alchemy podcast, Jesse Michels facilitated a thought-provoking dialogue between mathematician Eric Weinstein and astrophysicist Dr. Eric W. Davis, focused on the complexities surrounding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). Over a four-hour conversation, they delved into the conspicuous absence of theoretical physicists in UAP-related programs, despite the presence of engineers and material scientists with direct knowledge of alleged crash-retrieval efforts. Weinstein’s frustration with this absence highlights a critical gap in understanding the physics behind UAP capabilities, suggesting that the challenges posed by UAPs extend beyond engineering to fundamental physics. The discussion raises crucial questions about the structure of research and the compartmentalization of knowledge in defense-related projects.

Weinstein’s analogy regarding the lack of physicists in UAP retrieval programs likens the situation to an orchestra missing its essential musicians, arguing that without the input of theoretical physicists, significant scientific advancements cannot be realized. Davis corroborates this notion by contrasting the disjointed nature of current retrieval efforts with the collaborative framework of the Manhattan Project, where various scientific disciplines worked cohesively towards a common goal. This point underscores a potential failure in the organization of UAP research, suggesting that a more integrated approach involving theoretical physics could be necessary to address the profound challenges posed by UAP phenomena.

The conversation also touches on the historical context of the Manhattan Project, illustrating how compartmentalization was a deliberate design choice rather than a flaw. This historical analogy serves as a lens to examine contemporary UAP research, prompting speculation about whether a similar compartmentalization exists today—one that may exclude physicists by design. The Wilson-Davis memo suggests that access to sensitive programs is tightly controlled, hinting at layers of classification that might keep theoretical physics work hidden from the engineers working on the retrieval efforts. This raises concerns about the efficiency and effectiveness of current UAP research frameworks and whether the critical insights from theoretical physics are being deliberately isolated from practical engineering applications.

Moreover, the discussion introduces the role of notable figures like Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Maxwell, who, through their connections to various scientific and governmental institutions, have been implicated in potentially surveilling or influencing the scientific discourse around advanced physics. Weinstein posits that Epstein may have had motives beyond finance, positioning himself at the intersection of theoretical physics and intelligence operations. This assertion, coupled with the exploration of the Department of Energy’s classification system, suggests that significant research related to UAPs may be occurring outside of public and even military scrutiny. The implication is that if physicists are indeed located in hidden layers of government or private institutions, the broader understanding of UAP technology and its implications remains obscured by both secrecy and a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration.

link

The above is an AI summary of a longer article at the link above. ABN

Candace Owens on Tyler Robinson ‘hearing’

White House finally breaks silence on 10 missing scientists… but leaves more questions to be answered

The White House has broken their silence on the disturbing string of deaths and disappearances involving scientists with knowledge of America’s biggest secrets.

During Wednesday’s briefing at the White House, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked for the first time about the ten people linked to space or nuclear secrets who have mysteriously died or vanished without a trace since 2023.

When asked if the Trump Administration was aware of the incidents and if the US intelligence community was already investigating whether they were connected, Leavitt did not have a definitive answer for reporters.

Among the most prominent voices dissatisfied with the government’s response to the alleged national security threat has been Tennessee Congressman Tim Burchett, who has claimed McCasland was deeply tied to the country’s secret UFO programs.

Burchett previously told the Daily Mail he had been demanding answers regarding the search for the retired general and others, but had received no answers from the US intelligence community – including the so-called ‘alphabet agencies’ such as the FBI.

‘I’ve been constantly ran down different rabbit holes with them, so I don’t have any need to talk to them at all,’ the congressman said in March.

‘The numbers seem very high in these certain areas of research. I think we’d better be paying attention, and I don’t think we should trust our government.’

link

__________

The linked article provides a decent overview of this weird phenomenon. ABN

Erika No-Shows JD Vance. Public Relations Lies About Why. | Candace Ep 325

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SubDoZWHARo

Everything Bobby Brain Worm says is delusional crap.

Everything.

There is no need to parse every statement and explain every nuance. It is all unmitigated bullshit.

#BobbyBrainWorm #FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Everything Bobby Brain Worm says is delusional crap.

Everything.

There is no need to parse every statement and explain every nuance. It is all unmitigated bullshit.

#BobbyBrainWorm #FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Everything Bobby Brain Worm says is delusional crap.

Everything.

There is no need to parse every statement and explain every nuance. It is all unmitigated bullshit.

#BobbyBrainWorm #FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Everything Bobby Brain Worm says is delusional crap.

Everything.

There is no need to parse every statement and explain every nuance. It is all unmitigated bullshit.

#BobbyBrainWorm #FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Everything Bobby Brain Worm says is delusional crap.

Everything.

There is no need to parse every statement and explain every nuance. It is all unmitigated bullshit.

#BobbyBrainWorm #FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Fran takes down RFK with the most info in the shortest clip.

https://youtu.be/6r3-mZ25sDI

#FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Fran takes down RFK with the most info in the shortest clip.

https://youtu.be/6r3-mZ25sDI

#FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Fran takes down RFK with the most info in the shortest clip.

https://youtu.be/6r3-mZ25sDI

#FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Fran takes down RFK with the most info in the shortest clip.

https://youtu.be/6r3-mZ25sDI

#FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

Fran takes down RFK with the most info in the shortest clip.

https://youtu.be/6r3-mZ25sDI

#FascistEnablers #FoodSafety #Food #FoodQuality #Additives #Health #RFK_Jr #Poison #Healthcare #Voodoo #AntiVaxxer #AntiVaxx #TheCons #TheConsAreWeird #USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment

It's bizarre that young dude-bro Republicans are upset about chemicals in our food. They say food in the EU is much better, prepared using different recipes, with less additives.

#USpol #USpolitics #OrangeFreak #GOPfreaks #FascistTakeover #GOPweirdos #Weird #RFK #Trump #DonOld #Kennedy #BobKennedy #FDA #Regulations #BigGovt #BigGovernment #marker

@seasharp
2/3… partners with #megaCorporates via #PPP (#PublicPrivatePartnerships) to provide #uselessJobs that wouldn't be feasible under normal market circumstances. We're forced to #invest in #corporations we hate because its a hedge against the #moneyPrinting/#inflation.

The #corporatist doesn't pay tax. They claim *they are* the #publicGood and get #BigGovt funding to #virtueSignal to us.

2/3
@orekix @mlg