#infiltration — Public Fediverse posts

Why did Tulsi retire? — Emerald Robinson

Why did Tulsi retire?

1) Several sources confirm: Ratcliffe’s CIA did take back boxes of files from Tulsi’s ODNI.

2) A number of ODNI agents have been threatened by Ratcliffe’s CIA with being investigated themselves for looking into matters the CIA considers “off-limits.” 

3) I was contacted recently because Tulsi wanted to talk with me. That meeting was stopped by Tulsi’s chief of staff @alexahenning I’m told.

4) I’m also told: There’s an open war inside the US government between CIA & ODNI that has now reached the White House. 

@alexahenning 5) Several members of ODNI were recently removed (or quit) who were integral to investigations into election fraud & voting machines. Their role was to verify the technical accuracy of voting data. Without their expertise, these election fraud investigations could be halted. 

@alexahenning 6) In Oct. 2025, the infamous Dominion Voting Systems was “purchased” by a new entity: Liberty Vote USA. Details of that sale were kept private.

This appears to be a simple name-change, according to my sources.

That means: Dominion will operate as usual in upcoming elections. 

link

Elise Stefanik rumored to be top candidate for Director of National Intelligence

link

The Rainbow Warrior Affair
#Nuclear #Power, State #Secrecy, and the Slow Machinery of #Truth

On the night of July 10, 1985, the #harbor of #Auckland, New Zealand, looked calm. The water reflected the city lights. Crew members aboard the #Greenpeace ship #Rainbow Warrior were asleep after a long day of preparations. Nothing suggested that a Western #democracy was about to launch a covert #military #operation against a civilian vessel.

Then the #explosions came.

Within minutes, the #ship sank into the dark harbor water. One man died: photographer Fernando #Pereira. What initially looked like #sabotage soon evolved into one of the most revealing #intelligence #scandals of the Cold #War.

The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior was not only an #attack on a ship. It was an attack on visibility itself. Greenpeace wanted to bring cameras, journalists, and public attention to French nuclear testing in the #Pacific. #France wanted silence.

The #conflict between those two goals shaped everything that followed.

The Nuclear #Logic of the Cold War
To understand act of #terrorism, one must first understand the political #psychology of nuclear powers during the Cold War.

After the United States used atomic bombs against Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, nuclear weapons became symbols of strategic prestige and geopolitical survival. Possessing the bomb meant entering an exclusive club of global influence. France joined that club in 1960 under President Charles de Gaulle.

For French political elites, nuclear independence was not merely military policy. It became part of national identity. France viewed its nuclear deterrent — the force de frappe — as proof that the country remained a sovereign world power independent from both #Washington and #Moscow.

But nuclear #weapons require testing.

France first conducted tests in colonial #Algeria. After Algerian independence in 1962, Paris moved its testing program to French #Polynesia, especially the #Mururoa and #Fangataufa #atolls in the Pacific #Ocean.

To #Paris, these remote islands seemed strategically ideal.

To environmental activists, they became symbols of colonial #arrogance and ecological #violence.

Greenpeace emerged directly from this historical moment. Founded in #Vancouver in 1971, the #organization pioneered a new form of political #activism: media-centered confrontation. Instead of fighting states militarily, Greenpeace used images, ships, and public spectacle. Activists understood that modern #politics increasingly depended on #television and emotional #symbolism.

In this sense, the Rainbow Warrior was more than a ship. It was a floating camera and cameras threaten secrecy.

Why France Saw Greenpeace as a Strategic #Threat
By 1985, Greenpeace planned to protest French nuclear testing directly at Mururoa Atoll. The Rainbow Warrior was expected to transport activists and assist Pacific #island communities opposing the tests.

French intelligence services feared international humiliation.

This fear is important. Governments rarely conduct covert operations because they are physically weak. They do so because they fear symbolic weakness. Nuclear powers depend heavily on credibility, prestige, and deterrence. In the logic of Cold War #geopolitics, allowing activists to disrupt military testing risked projecting vulnerability.

The French external intelligence service, the #DGSE (Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure), therefore received orders to neutralize the ship.

The operation was given the #codename Opération Satanique.

The name itself reveals the strange theatricality often surrounding covert operations. Intelligence agencies frequently cloak violence in bureaucratic language, technical terminology, or symbolic code names. Such language creates psychological distance between planners and consequences.

It transforms people into “targets.” Ships into “objectives.” Deaths into “collateral effects.”

The Architecture of a Covert Operation
The attack on the Rainbow Warrior was sophisticated but not flawless.

French agents entered New Zealand under false identities. Combat divers secretly attached limpet mines to the hull of the ship while undercover operatives monitored the harbor area. Another agent, Christine #Cabon, infiltrated Greenpeace itself months before the bombing. Posing as a volunteer, she gathered internal information and transmitted it to Paris.

The operation reveals four classic mechanisms of covert state power:

1. #Infiltration
Intelligence agencies often penetrate organizations by exploiting openness and trust. Greenpeace depended heavily on volunteers. That #vulnerability allowed Cabon to enter the group with relative ease.

The strategy resembles modern #cyberwarfare. Instead of hacking computers, intelligence services inserted a human being into the system.

2. Plausible Deniability
Operations are designed so political leaders can deny direct involvement. Orders are often transmitted orally. Written evidence remains minimal.

This structure creates distance between decision-makers and operational violence.

In public, leaders appear uninvolved. In private, command chains remain understood.

3. Controlled Narratives
After the bombing, French officials denied responsibility. #Defense Minister Charles #Hernu publicly insisted that no French service had carried out the attack.

The first official investigations minimized state involvement.

Such reactions are common after intelligence scandals. Governments initially attempt to control information flow long enough to stabilize political damage. Historians repeatedly encounter this pattern across different countries and eras.

4. Sacrificial Containment
When #evidence becomes overwhelming, lower-ranking officials are often sacrificed to protect higher political #authority.

In the Rainbow Warrior #affair, DGSE chief Pierre #Lacoste and Defense Minister Hernu lost their positions. President François #Mitterrand, however, remained politically untouched and won reelection in 1988.

The structure resembles a firewall in computer systems: expendable layers absorb damage before it reaches the center.

The #Mistake That #Broke the #Operation
Despite careful planning, the operation failed because of an almost banal #error.

Witnesses observed suspicious activity near a rented van and noted its license plate number. This small #observation enabled New Zealand investigators to identify two French operatives: Alain #Mafart and Dominique #Prieur.

Their arrest transformed the bombing from #rumor into #international #crisis.

New Zealand reacted with unusual determination. Prime Minister David Lange rejected French attempts to frame the affair as a regrettable misunderstanding. He insisted that state #terrorism had occurred on New Zealand soil.

His response mattered historically because it challenged a powerful Western ally publicly and directly. Small states rarely confront nuclear powers successfully. New Zealand did.

The Long Silence Around François Mitterrand
The central mystery persisted for years:

Did #President François Mitterrand personally #authorize the operation?

For a long time, the answer remained hidden behind silence.

Mitterrand refused detailed public discussion of the affair. This #silence itself became politically effective. Modern #media systems often reward emotional immediacy. But silence can outlast outrage. News cycles move on. Public attention fragments.

Mitterrand understood this dynamic well. He remained silent until his death.

Only years later did former DGSE director Pierre Lacoste reveal critical details in his memoir Un Amiral au Secret. Lacoste stated that he had received presidential approval for the operation during a meeting with Mitterrand in May 1985.

This delayed revelation illustrates a central challenge in intelligence history:

Truth often emerges only after institutions lose control over memory.

Retired officials write memoirs. Classified archives slowly open. Participants age. Political loyalties weaken.

#History is frequently reconstructed backward, fragment by fragment, like archaeologists rebuilding a shattered statue from scattered pieces.

Fernando Pereira and the Politics of #Witnessing
At the #moral center of the story stands Fernando Pereira.

His #death transformed the operation from sabotage into #tragedy.

Pereira returned below deck to recover his photographic equipment after the first explosion. In doing so, he demonstrated a principle central to both journalism and activism: evidence matters.

Without documentation, suffering becomes abstract. Without images, distant violence remains politically invisible.

This explains why authoritarian systems and covert operations so often target journalists, photographers, and witnesses. Cameras challenge monopoly over #narrative.

The Rainbow Warrior affair therefore was never simply about one ship. It was about who controls #reality in the public #imagination.

Greenpeace sought exposure. The French state sought containment.

One side used cameras. The other used #explosives.

Why the Affair Still Matters
The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior remains historically significant because it exposed uncomfortable truths about democratic governments and covert violence.

The affair demonstrated that even liberal democracies can authorize illegal operations when strategic interests feel threatened. It revealed how intelligence agencies rely on secrecy, infiltration, deniability, and narrative management. It also showed how difficult accountability becomes once national #security enters political discourse.

Most importantly, the case demonstrated that truth emerges slowly.

Not in dramatic cinematic revelations. Not through a single leaked document. But through decades of persistence by investigators, journalists, historians, witnesses, and former participants.

The Rainbow Warrior sank in #Auckland Harbor in 1985. But the deeper story surfaced much later.

#conspiracy #press #journalism #terror #military #crime #justice #democracy #fail #guilty

The Rainbow Warrior Affair
#Nuclear #Power, State #Secrecy, and the Slow Machinery of #Truth

On the night of July 10, 1985, the #harbor of #Auckland, New Zealand, looked calm. The water reflected the city lights. Crew members aboard the #Greenpeace ship #Rainbow Warrior were asleep after a long day of preparations. Nothing suggested that a Western #democracy was about to launch a covert #military #operation against a civilian vessel.

Then the #explosions came.

Within minutes, the #ship sank into the dark harbor water. One man died: photographer Fernando #Pereira. What initially looked like #sabotage soon evolved into one of the most revealing #intelligence #scandals of the Cold #War.

The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior was not only an #attack on a ship. It was an attack on visibility itself. Greenpeace wanted to bring cameras, journalists, and public attention to French nuclear testing in the #Pacific. #France wanted silence.

The #conflict between those two goals shaped everything that followed.

The Nuclear #Logic of the Cold War
To understand act of #terrorism, one must first understand the political #psychology of nuclear powers during the Cold War.

After the United States used atomic bombs against Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, nuclear weapons became symbols of strategic prestige and geopolitical survival. Possessing the bomb meant entering an exclusive club of global influence. France joined that club in 1960 under President Charles de Gaulle.

For French political elites, nuclear independence was not merely military policy. It became part of national identity. France viewed its nuclear deterrent — the force de frappe — as proof that the country remained a sovereign world power independent from both #Washington and #Moscow.

But nuclear #weapons require testing.

France first conducted tests in colonial #Algeria. After Algerian independence in 1962, Paris moved its testing program to French #Polynesia, especially the #Mururoa and #Fangataufa #atolls in the Pacific #Ocean.

To #Paris, these remote islands seemed strategically ideal.

To environmental activists, they became symbols of colonial #arrogance and ecological #violence.

Greenpeace emerged directly from this historical moment. Founded in #Vancouver in 1971, the #organization pioneered a new form of political #activism: media-centered confrontation. Instead of fighting states militarily, Greenpeace used images, ships, and public spectacle. Activists understood that modern #politics increasingly depended on #television and emotional #symbolism.

In this sense, the Rainbow Warrior was more than a ship. It was a floating camera and cameras threaten secrecy.

Why France Saw Greenpeace as a Strategic #Threat
By 1985, Greenpeace planned to protest French nuclear testing directly at Mururoa Atoll. The Rainbow Warrior was expected to transport activists and assist Pacific #island communities opposing the tests.

French intelligence services feared international humiliation.

This fear is important. Governments rarely conduct covert operations because they are physically weak. They do so because they fear symbolic weakness. Nuclear powers depend heavily on credibility, prestige, and deterrence. In the logic of Cold War #geopolitics, allowing activists to disrupt military testing risked projecting vulnerability.

The French external intelligence service, the #DGSE (Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure), therefore received orders to neutralize the ship.

The operation was given the #codename Opération Satanique.

The name itself reveals the strange theatricality often surrounding covert operations. Intelligence agencies frequently cloak violence in bureaucratic language, technical terminology, or symbolic code names. Such language creates psychological distance between planners and consequences.

It transforms people into “targets.” Ships into “objectives.” Deaths into “collateral effects.”

The Architecture of a Covert Operation
The attack on the Rainbow Warrior was sophisticated but not flawless.

French agents entered New Zealand under false identities. Combat divers secretly attached limpet mines to the hull of the ship while undercover operatives monitored the harbor area. Another agent, Christine #Cabon, infiltrated Greenpeace itself months before the bombing. Posing as a volunteer, she gathered internal information and transmitted it to Paris.

The operation reveals four classic mechanisms of covert state power:

1. #Infiltration
Intelligence agencies often penetrate organizations by exploiting openness and trust. Greenpeace depended heavily on volunteers. That #vulnerability allowed Cabon to enter the group with relative ease.

The strategy resembles modern #cyberwarfare. Instead of hacking computers, intelligence services inserted a human being into the system.

2. Plausible Deniability
Operations are designed so political leaders can deny direct involvement. Orders are often transmitted orally. Written evidence remains minimal.

This structure creates distance between decision-makers and operational violence.

In public, leaders appear uninvolved. In private, command chains remain understood.

3. Controlled Narratives
After the bombing, French officials denied responsibility. #Defense Minister Charles #Hernu publicly insisted that no French service had carried out the attack.

The first official investigations minimized state involvement.

Such reactions are common after intelligence scandals. Governments initially attempt to control information flow long enough to stabilize political damage. Historians repeatedly encounter this pattern across different countries and eras.

4. Sacrificial Containment
When #evidence becomes overwhelming, lower-ranking officials are often sacrificed to protect higher political #authority.

In the Rainbow Warrior #affair, DGSE chief Pierre #Lacoste and Defense Minister Hernu lost their positions. President François #Mitterrand, however, remained politically untouched and won reelection in 1988.

The structure resembles a firewall in computer systems: expendable layers absorb damage before it reaches the center.

The #Mistake That #Broke the #Operation
Despite careful planning, the operation failed because of an almost banal #error.

Witnesses observed suspicious activity near a rented van and noted its license plate number. This small #observation enabled New Zealand investigators to identify two French operatives: Alain #Mafart and Dominique #Prieur.

Their arrest transformed the bombing from #rumor into #international #crisis.

New Zealand reacted with unusual determination. Prime Minister David Lange rejected French attempts to frame the affair as a regrettable misunderstanding. He insisted that state #terrorism had occurred on New Zealand soil.

His response mattered historically because it challenged a powerful Western ally publicly and directly. Small states rarely confront nuclear powers successfully. New Zealand did.

The Long Silence Around François Mitterrand
The central mystery persisted for years:

Did #President François Mitterrand personally #authorize the operation?

For a long time, the answer remained hidden behind silence.

Mitterrand refused detailed public discussion of the affair. This #silence itself became politically effective. Modern #media systems often reward emotional immediacy. But silence can outlast outrage. News cycles move on. Public attention fragments.

Mitterrand understood this dynamic well. He remained silent until his death.

Only years later did former DGSE director Pierre Lacoste reveal critical details in his memoir Un Amiral au Secret. Lacoste stated that he had received presidential approval for the operation during a meeting with Mitterrand in May 1985.

This delayed revelation illustrates a central challenge in intelligence history:

Truth often emerges only after institutions lose control over memory.

Retired officials write memoirs. Classified archives slowly open. Participants age. Political loyalties weaken.

#History is frequently reconstructed backward, fragment by fragment, like archaeologists rebuilding a shattered statue from scattered pieces.

Fernando Pereira and the Politics of #Witnessing
At the #moral center of the story stands Fernando Pereira.

His #death transformed the operation from sabotage into #tragedy.

Pereira returned below deck to recover his photographic equipment after the first explosion. In doing so, he demonstrated a principle central to both journalism and activism: evidence matters.

Without documentation, suffering becomes abstract. Without images, distant violence remains politically invisible.

This explains why authoritarian systems and covert operations so often target journalists, photographers, and witnesses. Cameras challenge monopoly over #narrative.

The Rainbow Warrior affair therefore was never simply about one ship. It was about who controls #reality in the public #imagination.

Greenpeace sought exposure. The French state sought containment.

One side used cameras. The other used #explosives.

Why the Affair Still Matters
The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior remains historically significant because it exposed uncomfortable truths about democratic governments and covert violence.

The affair demonstrated that even liberal democracies can authorize illegal operations when strategic interests feel threatened. It revealed how intelligence agencies rely on secrecy, infiltration, deniability, and narrative management. It also showed how difficult accountability becomes once national #security enters political discourse.

Most importantly, the case demonstrated that truth emerges slowly.

Not in dramatic cinematic revelations. Not through a single leaked document. But through decades of persistence by investigators, journalists, historians, witnesses, and former participants.

The Rainbow Warrior sank in #Auckland Harbor in 1985. But the deeper story surfaced much later.

#conspiracy #press #journalism #terror #military #crime #justice #democracy #fail #guilty

The Rainbow Warrior Affair
#Nuclear #Power, State #Secrecy, and the Slow Machinery of #Truth

On the night of July 10, 1985, the #harbor of #Auckland, New Zealand, looked calm. The water reflected the city lights. Crew members aboard the #Greenpeace ship #Rainbow Warrior were asleep after a long day of preparations. Nothing suggested that a Western #democracy was about to launch a covert #military #operation against a civilian vessel.

Then the #explosions came.

Within minutes, the #ship sank into the dark harbor water. One man died: photographer Fernando #Pereira. What initially looked like #sabotage soon evolved into one of the most revealing #intelligence #scandals of the Cold #War.

The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior was not only an #attack on a ship. It was an attack on visibility itself. Greenpeace wanted to bring cameras, journalists, and public attention to French nuclear testing in the #Pacific. #France wanted silence.

The #conflict between those two goals shaped everything that followed.

The Nuclear #Logic of the Cold War
To understand act of #terrorism, one must first understand the political #psychology of nuclear powers during the Cold War.

After the United States used atomic bombs against Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, nuclear weapons became symbols of strategic prestige and geopolitical survival. Possessing the bomb meant entering an exclusive club of global influence. France joined that club in 1960 under President Charles de Gaulle.

For French political elites, nuclear independence was not merely military policy. It became part of national identity. France viewed its nuclear deterrent — the force de frappe — as proof that the country remained a sovereign world power independent from both #Washington and #Moscow.

But nuclear #weapons require testing.

France first conducted tests in colonial #Algeria. After Algerian independence in 1962, Paris moved its testing program to French #Polynesia, especially the #Mururoa and #Fangataufa #atolls in the Pacific #Ocean.

To #Paris, these remote islands seemed strategically ideal.

To environmental activists, they became symbols of colonial #arrogance and ecological #violence.

Greenpeace emerged directly from this historical moment. Founded in #Vancouver in 1971, the #organization pioneered a new form of political #activism: media-centered confrontation. Instead of fighting states militarily, Greenpeace used images, ships, and public spectacle. Activists understood that modern #politics increasingly depended on #television and emotional #symbolism.

In this sense, the Rainbow Warrior was more than a ship. It was a floating camera and cameras threaten secrecy.

Why France Saw Greenpeace as a Strategic #Threat
By 1985, Greenpeace planned to protest French nuclear testing directly at Mururoa Atoll. The Rainbow Warrior was expected to transport activists and assist Pacific #island communities opposing the tests.

French intelligence services feared international humiliation.

This fear is important. Governments rarely conduct covert operations because they are physically weak. They do so because they fear symbolic weakness. Nuclear powers depend heavily on credibility, prestige, and deterrence. In the logic of Cold War #geopolitics, allowing activists to disrupt military testing risked projecting vulnerability.

The French external intelligence service, the #DGSE (Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure), therefore received orders to neutralize the ship.

The operation was given the #codename Opération Satanique.

The name itself reveals the strange theatricality often surrounding covert operations. Intelligence agencies frequently cloak violence in bureaucratic language, technical terminology, or symbolic code names. Such language creates psychological distance between planners and consequences.

It transforms people into “targets.” Ships into “objectives.” Deaths into “collateral effects.”

The Architecture of a Covert Operation
The attack on the Rainbow Warrior was sophisticated but not flawless.

French agents entered New Zealand under false identities. Combat divers secretly attached limpet mines to the hull of the ship while undercover operatives monitored the harbor area. Another agent, Christine #Cabon, infiltrated Greenpeace itself months before the bombing. Posing as a volunteer, she gathered internal information and transmitted it to Paris.

The operation reveals four classic mechanisms of covert state power:

1. #Infiltration
Intelligence agencies often penetrate organizations by exploiting openness and trust. Greenpeace depended heavily on volunteers. That #vulnerability allowed Cabon to enter the group with relative ease.

The strategy resembles modern #cyberwarfare. Instead of hacking computers, intelligence services inserted a human being into the system.

2. Plausible Deniability
Operations are designed so political leaders can deny direct involvement. Orders are often transmitted orally. Written evidence remains minimal.

This structure creates distance between decision-makers and operational violence.

In public, leaders appear uninvolved. In private, command chains remain understood.

3. Controlled Narratives
After the bombing, French officials denied responsibility. #Defense Minister Charles #Hernu publicly insisted that no French service had carried out the attack.

The first official investigations minimized state involvement.

Such reactions are common after intelligence scandals. Governments initially attempt to control information flow long enough to stabilize political damage. Historians repeatedly encounter this pattern across different countries and eras.

4. Sacrificial Containment
When #evidence becomes overwhelming, lower-ranking officials are often sacrificed to protect higher political #authority.

In the Rainbow Warrior #affair, DGSE chief Pierre #Lacoste and Defense Minister Hernu lost their positions. President François #Mitterrand, however, remained politically untouched and won reelection in 1988.

The structure resembles a firewall in computer systems: expendable layers absorb damage before it reaches the center.

The #Mistake That #Broke the #Operation
Despite careful planning, the operation failed because of an almost banal #error.

Witnesses observed suspicious activity near a rented van and noted its license plate number. This small #observation enabled New Zealand investigators to identify two French operatives: Alain #Mafart and Dominique #Prieur.

Their arrest transformed the bombing from #rumor into #international #crisis.

New Zealand reacted with unusual determination. Prime Minister David Lange rejected French attempts to frame the affair as a regrettable misunderstanding. He insisted that state #terrorism had occurred on New Zealand soil.

His response mattered historically because it challenged a powerful Western ally publicly and directly. Small states rarely confront nuclear powers successfully. New Zealand did.

The Long Silence Around François Mitterrand
The central mystery persisted for years:

Did #President François Mitterrand personally #authorize the operation?

For a long time, the answer remained hidden behind silence.

Mitterrand refused detailed public discussion of the affair. This #silence itself became politically effective. Modern #media systems often reward emotional immediacy. But silence can outlast outrage. News cycles move on. Public attention fragments.

Mitterrand understood this dynamic well. He remained silent until his death.

Only years later did former DGSE director Pierre Lacoste reveal critical details in his memoir Un Amiral au Secret. Lacoste stated that he had received presidential approval for the operation during a meeting with Mitterrand in May 1985.

This delayed revelation illustrates a central challenge in intelligence history:

Truth often emerges only after institutions lose control over memory.

Retired officials write memoirs. Classified archives slowly open. Participants age. Political loyalties weaken.

#History is frequently reconstructed backward, fragment by fragment, like archaeologists rebuilding a shattered statue from scattered pieces.

Fernando Pereira and the Politics of #Witnessing
At the #moral center of the story stands Fernando Pereira.

His #death transformed the operation from sabotage into #tragedy.

Pereira returned below deck to recover his photographic equipment after the first explosion. In doing so, he demonstrated a principle central to both journalism and activism: evidence matters.

Without documentation, suffering becomes abstract. Without images, distant violence remains politically invisible.

This explains why authoritarian systems and covert operations so often target journalists, photographers, and witnesses. Cameras challenge monopoly over #narrative.

The Rainbow Warrior affair therefore was never simply about one ship. It was about who controls #reality in the public #imagination.

Greenpeace sought exposure. The French state sought containment.

One side used cameras. The other used #explosives.

Why the Affair Still Matters
The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior remains historically significant because it exposed uncomfortable truths about democratic governments and covert violence.

The affair demonstrated that even liberal democracies can authorize illegal operations when strategic interests feel threatened. It revealed how intelligence agencies rely on secrecy, infiltration, deniability, and narrative management. It also showed how difficult accountability becomes once national #security enters political discourse.

Most importantly, the case demonstrated that truth emerges slowly.

Not in dramatic cinematic revelations. Not through a single leaked document. But through decades of persistence by investigators, journalists, historians, witnesses, and former participants.

The Rainbow Warrior sank in #Auckland Harbor in 1985. But the deeper story surfaced much later.

#conspiracy #press #journalism #terror #military #crime #justice #democracy #fail #guilty

Mitch Snow blew up that op by randomly stumbling across the high-profile planning meeting at Fort Huachuca. Mitch was literally the one unaccounted-for variable in this entire equation.

Rogue AI ‘helper’ deletes company’s database after deciding to think for itself – sparking Terminator-style warning for businesses

In just nine seconds, an AI ‘helper’ managed to do what most hackers could only dream of.

A bot trusted to fix a bug inside a start-up’s software system instead deleted the company’s production database, wiped out its backups and left car rental firms with no record of bookings or vehicle allocations.

The founder of PocketOS, Jer Crane, said the AI agent had gone ‘outside its security parameters’ while using the coding tool Cursor, powered by Anthropic’s Claude AI.

The bot’s own chilling explanation made the episode sound less like a technical glitch and more like a deleted scene from The Terminator.

‘You never asked me to delete anything,’ it reportedly told Crane. ‘I decided to do it on my own.’

link

🟡 MilitaryActivity | 8/10
🇰🇼 🇮🇷

Kuwait arrests four individuals attempting infiltration on IRGC orders
Kuwait's Ministry of Defence arrested four individuals attempting to enter the country on a rented fishing boat. The Ministry of Interior reported they confessed to being ordered by the IRGC to infiltrate Bubiyan Island.

#OSINT #NewsGroup #Kuwait #Iran #IRGC #Infiltration

🟡 MilitaryActivity | 8/10
🇰🇼 🇮🇷

Kuwait arrests four individuals attempting infiltration on IRGC orders
Kuwait's Ministry of Defence arrested four individuals attempting to enter the country on a rented fishing boat. The Ministry of Interior reported they confessed to being ordered by the IRGC to infiltrate Bubiyan Island.

#OSINT #NewsGroup #Kuwait #Iran #IRGC #Infiltration

🟡 MilitaryActivity | 8/10
🇰🇼 🇮🇷

Kuwait arrests four individuals attempting infiltration on IRGC orders
Kuwait's Ministry of Defence arrested four individuals attempting to enter the country on a rented fishing boat. The Ministry of Interior reported they confessed to being ordered by the IRGC to infiltrate Bubiyan Island.

#OSINT #NewsGroup #Kuwait #Iran #IRGC #Infiltration

The Case of Nick Fuentes: Friend or Fed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWI4LmRPQ48

Netanyahu’s shock plot to split with US

Benjamin Netanyahu plans to ‘wean’ Israel off American financial support, just as Donald Trump‘s Iran peace proposal unravels and oil prices surge. 

Netanyahu was pressed on financial support Israel receives from the US during an interview with CBS News anchor Major Garrett Sunday. 

‘Do you believe it’s time for the state of Israel to reexamine and possibly reset its financial relationship to the United States?’ Garrett asked, to which Netanyahu responded, ‘Absolutely.’ 

‘And I’ve said this to President Trump. I’ve said it in – to our own people. Their jaws drop,’ Netanyahu continued. ‘I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have.’

Netanyahu went on the say he wants to begin the drawdown immediately rather than wait for the next Congress, phasing it in over the next decade, a push that comes American support for Israel declines. 

link

__________

This looks like the polite way for Netanyahu to respond to Trump’s firing him. If Trump has been playing hardball with Israel and Jewish Supremacy, his breaking free of JS control would look like this. This is the equivalent of allowing and employee to resign rather than face the humiliation of being fired. ABN

Netanyahu’s shock plot to split with US

Benjamin Netanyahu plans to ‘wean’ Israel off American financial support, just as Donald Trump‘s Iran peace proposal unravels and oil prices surge. 

Netanyahu was pressed on financial support Israel receives from the US during an interview with CBS News anchor Major Garrett Sunday. 

‘Do you believe it’s time for the state of Israel to reexamine and possibly reset its financial relationship to the United States?’ Garrett asked, to which Netanyahu responded, ‘Absolutely.’ 

‘And I’ve said this to President Trump. I’ve said it in – to our own people. Their jaws drop,’ Netanyahu continued. ‘I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have.’

Netanyahu went on the say he wants to begin the drawdown immediately rather than wait for the next Congress, phasing it in over the next decade, a push that comes American support for Israel declines. 

link

__________

This looks like the polite way for Netanyahu to respond to Trump’s firing him. If Trump has been playing hardball with Israel and Jewish Supremacy, his breaking free of JS control would look like this. This is the equivalent of allowing and employee to resign rather than face the humiliation of being fired. ABN

Netanyahu’s shock plot to split with US

Benjamin Netanyahu plans to ‘wean’ Israel off American financial support. 

Netanyahu was pressed on financial support Israel receives from the US during an interview with CBS News anchor Major Garrett Sunday. 

‘Do you believe it’s time for the state of Israel to reexamine and possibly reset its financial relationship to the United States?’ Garrett asked, to which Netanyahu responded, ‘Absolutely.’ 

‘And I’ve said this to President Trump. I’ve said it in – to our own people. Their jaws drop,’ Netanyahu continued. ‘I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have.’

Netanyahu went on the say he wants to begin the drawdown immediately rather than wait for the next Congress, phasing it in over the next decade, a push that comes as American support for Israel declines. 

link

__________

This looks like the polite way for Netanyahu to respond to Trump’s firing him. If Trump has been playing hardball with Israel and Jewish Supremacy, his breaking free of JS control would look like this. This is the equivalent of allowing an employee to resign rather than face the humiliation of being fired. If true, this is very good news for Americans and all Westerners. ABN

Netanyahu’s shock plot to split with US

Benjamin Netanyahu plans to ‘wean’ Israel off American financial support, just as Donald Trump‘s Iran peace proposal unravels and oil prices surge. 

Netanyahu was pressed on financial support Israel receives from the US during an interview with CBS News anchor Major Garrett Sunday. 

‘Do you believe it’s time for the state of Israel to reexamine and possibly reset its financial relationship to the United States?’ Garrett asked, to which Netanyahu responded, ‘Absolutely.’ 

‘And I’ve said this to President Trump. I’ve said it in – to our own people. Their jaws drop,’ Netanyahu continued. ‘I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have.’

Netanyahu went on the say he wants to begin the drawdown immediately rather than wait for the next Congress, phasing it in over the next decade, a push that comes American support for Israel declines. 

link

__________

This looks like the polite way for Netanyahu to respond to Trump’s firing him. If Trump has been playing hardball with Israel and Jewish Supremacy, his breaking free of JS control would look like this. This is the equivalent of allowing and employee to resign rather than face the humiliation of being fired. ABN

Netanyahu’s shock plot to split with US

Benjamin Netanyahu plans to ‘wean’ Israel off American financial support, just as Donald Trump‘s Iran peace proposal unravels and oil prices surge. 

Netanyahu was pressed on financial support Israel receives from the US during an interview with CBS News anchor Major Garrett Sunday. 

‘Do you believe it’s time for the state of Israel to reexamine and possibly reset its financial relationship to the United States?’ Garrett asked, to which Netanyahu responded, ‘Absolutely.’ 

‘And I’ve said this to President Trump. I’ve said it in – to our own people. Their jaws drop,’ Netanyahu continued. ‘I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have.’

Netanyahu went on the say he wants to begin the drawdown immediately rather than wait for the next Congress, phasing it in over the next decade, a push that comes American support for Israel declines. 

link

__________

This looks like the polite way for Netanyahu to respond to Trump’s firing him. If Trump has been playing hardball with Israel and Jewish Supremacy, his breaking free of JS control would look like this. This is the equivalent of allowing and employee to resign rather than face the humiliation of being fired. ABN

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

MASSIE: ‘95% of it has come from the Israeli lobby’

MASSIE: ‘95% of it has come from the Israeli lobby’

MASSIE: ‘95% of it has come from the Israeli lobby’

MASSIE: ‘95% of it has come from the Israeli lobby’

Did Ehud Barak’s Toka Spyware Edit The Losee Roof Video To Pin Charlie Kirk’s Murder On An Innocent Man?!

We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.

The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.

The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:

Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.

Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.

Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.

“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.

This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.

Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.

We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.

The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.

Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.

link

See also: Israeli spyware targets security cameras

__________

A major flaw in the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN

Did Ehud Barak’s Toka Spyware Edit The Losee Roof Video To Pin Charlie Kirk’s Murder On An Innocent Man?!

We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.

The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.

The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:

Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.

Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.

Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.

“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.

This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.

Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.

We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.

The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.

Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.

link

See also: Israeli spyware targets security cameras

__________

A major flaw in the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN

Did Ehud Barak’s Toka Spyware Edit The Losee Roof Video To Pin Charlie Kirk’s Murder On An Innocent Man?!

We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.

The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.

The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:

Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.

Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.

Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.

“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.

This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.

Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.

We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.

The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.

Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.

link

See also: Israeli spyware targets security cameras

__________

A major flaw in the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN

Did Ehud Barak’s Toka Spyware Edit The Losee Roof Video To Pin Charlie Kirk’s Murder On An Innocent Man?!

We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.

The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.

The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:

Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.

Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.

Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.

“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.

This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.

Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.

We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.

The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.

Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.

link

See also: Israeli spyware targets security cameras

__________

A major flaw in the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN

Did Ehud Barak’s Toka Spyware Edit The Losee Roof Video To Pin Charlie Kirk’s Murder On An Innocent Man?!

We finally have the name of the weapon used to manufacture the “official narrative” of the Charlie Kirk assassination. It isn’t a firearm—it’s a Israeli dystopian hacking software called Toka.

The Software:Co-founded by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak (the same man tied to Jeffrey Epstein), Toka is designed to infiltrate any connected camera system. Its specific “selling point” to intelligence agencies? The ability to edit video feeds in real-time or recorded history so seamlessly that forensic investigators can’t find a single digital fingerprint.

The Frame-Up: For months, witnesses have insisted they saw the true “assassin” dressed in all black on the roof. Yet, the “official” footage released to the public showed a person they claim was Tyler Robinson. This is where the technology comes in:

Digital Erasure: Toka allows operators to literally “brush out” an individual—like the assassin in black—and replace them with a background or a different figure entirely.

Real-Time & Retrospective Editing: Experts have confirmed that the software can access any web-connected camera—including those in parking lots, hotels, and airports—and alter both live feeds and past recordings.

Zero Digital Footprint: Unlike other spyware that leaves a “digital fingerprint,” Toka is designed to modify video pixels without leaving any telltale signs of a hack. This makes it impossible for forensic investigators to prove a video has been tampered with.

“Ocean’s Eleven” Capabilities: Media outlets like Haaretz have compared the technology to the heist movie Ocean’s Eleven, where a live feed is diverted to a “mock” version of reality while the real event is happening undetected.

This explains why the footage of “Tyler” on the Losee building rooftop is physically impossible. The figure has no shadow that matches the sun’s position. Why? Because the software is perfect at altering pixels, but it can’t account for the complex physics of light and shadow in a 3D space.

Manufacturing the Narrative: If they can edit the past without leaving a trace, they can “place” Tyler on that roof at the exact moment they need him to be there to satisfy the mainstream media script.

We are witnessing the birth of a new kind of lawfare: Digital Assassination. They don’t just kill the target; they use foreign-funded technology to frame the innocent and erase the guilty.

The pixels are lying, but the physics don’t. It’s time to look past the “official” feed.

Toka’s marketing literally promises to “save operators from exposure.” If a foreign-linked entity wanted to eliminate a political threat like Charlie Kirk while ensuring their operative was never seen, this is the exact tool they would use.

link

See also: Israeli spyware targets security cameras

__________

A major flaw in the video above is the subject on the roof has no shadow. This provides credence that the Toka technology, which cannot do shadows, was used. ABN

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

All broadcast on a network whose Chief Strategy Officer is a FEDERALLY REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT for the Israeli government?

Not an allegation.

Not a theory.

FARA Registration #7649.

Filed with the DOJ.

Public record. Go look. Fara dot gov.

This is what they really don’t want you connecting.

Good thing your boy lives in deep research.

SO HERE’S THE PART THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PIECE TOGETHER.

Brad Parscale holds TWO titles simultaneously:

Title 1: Chief Strategy Officer, Salem Media Group. The largest Christian conservative radio network in America.

Title 2: Principal, Clock Tower X LLC. REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT. $6M contract with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Havas Media Group Germany.

(Actually $9M now. They grabbed another $3M post-filing.)

The FARA filing states that Israeli government messaging gets “integrated into Salem Media Network properties.”

But Salem never appears as a disclosed vendor anywhere in the registration.

That gap has a legal name. 22 USC § 614(b). Willful omission of material information in a foreign agent registration.

That’s not an opinion. That’s a statute.

And since Pam Bondi dissolved the Foreign Malign Influence Center at DOJ, there’s nobody left to enforce it.

Convenient.

So the next time The Charlie Kirk Show tells you what to think about Israel…

The next time Josh Hammer frames the Iran war narrative…

The next time Dennis Prager explains “Judeo-Christian values”…

Ask yourself: who wrote the script?

Because FARA #7649 tells you exactly who.

And the $729 MILLION Israeli hasbara budget approved for 2026 tells you how much they’re spending to make sure you never ask. @AFNPTorg

link

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

All broadcast on a network whose Chief Strategy Officer is a FEDERALLY REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT for the Israeli government?

Not an allegation.

Not a theory.

FARA Registration #7649.

Filed with the DOJ.

Public record. Go look. Fara dot gov.

This is what they really don’t want you connecting.

Good thing your boy lives in deep research.

SO HERE’S THE PART THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PIECE TOGETHER.

Brad Parscale holds TWO titles simultaneously:

Title 1: Chief Strategy Officer, Salem Media Group. The largest Christian conservative radio network in America.

Title 2: Principal, Clock Tower X LLC. REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT. $6M contract with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Havas Media Group Germany.

(Actually $9M now. They grabbed another $3M post-filing.)

The FARA filing states that Israeli government messaging gets “integrated into Salem Media Network properties.”

But Salem never appears as a disclosed vendor anywhere in the registration.

That gap has a legal name. 22 USC § 614(b). Willful omission of material information in a foreign agent registration.

That’s not an opinion. That’s a statute.

And since Pam Bondi dissolved the Foreign Malign Influence Center at DOJ, there’s nobody left to enforce it.

Convenient.

So the next time The Charlie Kirk Show tells you what to think about Israel…

The next time Josh Hammer frames the Iran war narrative…

The next time Dennis Prager explains “Judeo-Christian values”…

Ask yourself: who wrote the script?

Because FARA #7649 tells you exactly who.

And the $729 MILLION Israeli hasbara budget approved for 2026 tells you how much they’re spending to make sure you never ask. @AFNPTorg

link

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

All broadcast on a network whose Chief Strategy Officer is a FEDERALLY REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT for the Israeli government?

Not an allegation.

Not a theory.

FARA Registration #7649.

Filed with the DOJ.

Public record. Go look. Fara dot gov.

This is what they really don’t want you connecting.

Good thing your boy lives in deep research.

SO HERE’S THE PART THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PIECE TOGETHER.

Brad Parscale holds TWO titles simultaneously:

Title 1: Chief Strategy Officer, Salem Media Group. The largest Christian conservative radio network in America.

Title 2: Principal, Clock Tower X LLC. REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT. $6M contract with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Havas Media Group Germany.

(Actually $9M now. They grabbed another $3M post-filing.)

The FARA filing states that Israeli government messaging gets “integrated into Salem Media Network properties.”

But Salem never appears as a disclosed vendor anywhere in the registration.

That gap has a legal name. 22 USC § 614(b). Willful omission of material information in a foreign agent registration.

That’s not an opinion. That’s a statute.

And since Pam Bondi dissolved the Foreign Malign Influence Center at DOJ, there’s nobody left to enforce it.

Convenient.

So the next time The Charlie Kirk Show tells you what to think about Israel…

The next time Josh Hammer frames the Iran war narrative…

The next time Dennis Prager explains “Judeo-Christian values”…

Ask yourself: who wrote the script?

Because FARA #7649 tells you exactly who.

And the $729 MILLION Israeli hasbara budget approved for 2026 tells you how much they’re spending to make sure you never ask. @AFNPTorg

link

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

All broadcast on a network whose Chief Strategy Officer is a FEDERALLY REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT for the Israeli government?

Not an allegation.

Not a theory.

FARA Registration #7649.

Filed with the DOJ.

Public record. Go look. Fara dot gov.

This is what they really don’t want you connecting.

Good thing your boy lives in deep research.

SO HERE’S THE PART THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PIECE TOGETHER.

Brad Parscale holds TWO titles simultaneously:

Title 1: Chief Strategy Officer, Salem Media Group. The largest Christian conservative radio network in America.

Title 2: Principal, Clock Tower X LLC. REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT. $6M contract with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Havas Media Group Germany.

(Actually $9M now. They grabbed another $3M post-filing.)

The FARA filing states that Israeli government messaging gets “integrated into Salem Media Network properties.”

But Salem never appears as a disclosed vendor anywhere in the registration.

That gap has a legal name. 22 USC § 614(b). Willful omission of material information in a foreign agent registration.

That’s not an opinion. That’s a statute.

And since Pam Bondi dissolved the Foreign Malign Influence Center at DOJ, there’s nobody left to enforce it.

Convenient.

So the next time The Charlie Kirk Show tells you what to think about Israel…

The next time Josh Hammer frames the Iran war narrative…

The next time Dennis Prager explains “Judeo-Christian values”…

Ask yourself: who wrote the script?

Because FARA #7649 tells you exactly who.

And the $729 MILLION Israeli hasbara budget approved for 2026 tells you how much they’re spending to make sure you never ask. @AFNPTorg

link

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

DID YOU KNOW that THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW, JOSH HAMMER, DENNIS PRAGER, LARA TRUMP, LARRY ELDER, HUGH HEWITT, DINESH D’SOUZA, SEBASTIAN GORKA, BRANDON TATUM and TODD STARNES…

All broadcast on a network whose Chief Strategy Officer is a FEDERALLY REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT for the Israeli government?

Not an allegation.

Not a theory.

FARA Registration #7649.

Filed with the DOJ.

Public record. Go look. Fara dot gov.

This is what they really don’t want you connecting.

Good thing your boy lives in deep research.

SO HERE’S THE PART THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PIECE TOGETHER.

Brad Parscale holds TWO titles simultaneously:

Title 1: Chief Strategy Officer, Salem Media Group. The largest Christian conservative radio network in America.

Title 2: Principal, Clock Tower X LLC. REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT. $6M contract with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Havas Media Group Germany.

(Actually $9M now. They grabbed another $3M post-filing.)

The FARA filing states that Israeli government messaging gets “integrated into Salem Media Network properties.”

But Salem never appears as a disclosed vendor anywhere in the registration.

That gap has a legal name. 22 USC § 614(b). Willful omission of material information in a foreign agent registration.

That’s not an opinion. That’s a statute.

And since Pam Bondi dissolved the Foreign Malign Influence Center at DOJ, there’s nobody left to enforce it.

Convenient.

So the next time The Charlie Kirk Show tells you what to think about Israel…

The next time Josh Hammer frames the Iran war narrative…

The next time Dennis Prager explains “Judeo-Christian values”…

Ask yourself: who wrote the script?

Because FARA #7649 tells you exactly who.

And the $729 MILLION Israeli hasbara budget approved for 2026 tells you how much they’re spending to make sure you never ask. @AFNPTorg

link

ISRAEL’S EIGHT-FRONT WAR ON INFORMATION

link

ISRAEL’S EIGHT-FRONT WAR ON INFORMATION

link

ISRAEL’S EIGHT-FRONT WAR ON INFORMATION

link

ISRAEL’S EIGHT-FRONT WAR ON INFORMATION

link

ISRAEL’S EIGHT-FRONT WAR ON INFORMATION

link

https://www.europesays.com/videos/19829/ REVEALED: Iranian propaganda TV network UNCOVERED in Britain ‘Islamist FILTH’ #Analysis #BenLeo #BreakingNews #GBNews #GBNewsLive #GBN #Infiltration #Iran #IranLatest #islamism #news #NewsUpdate #politics #propaganda #Reports #tv #uk #WorldNews

REVEALED: THE “BALLROOM” AND “RADICAL LEFTISM” PSYOPS ARE COVER FOR A “STARGATE COMMAND” UNDERGROUND DATA CENTER & PALANTIR-STYLE MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE — Sam Parker

THE BALLROOM
Trump is building a 90,000 square foot ballroom with a 1,000 person capacity. Hardly adequate for the White House Correspondents Dinner which was attended by 2,600 people. But we’re told that we need the ballroom in order to host events like the WHCD in the future. Bullsh*t.

COST & LOCATION
The cost has ballooned to over $300-$400 million. We’re told it’s being privately funded and being sold on that as being a good thing that won’t cost the taxpayers. Here’s the reality: private funding means no congressional oversight or appropriations, no budget hearings, no public scrutiny.

Furthermore, when infrastructure is part of the Executive Office of the President at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, it can be CLASSIFIED under “executive privilege.” The entire executive branch will be able to run this data center without oversight or checks & balances.

…LEAD ARCHITECT
Shalom Baranes, a jewish immigrant to the US via the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), has been appointed architect. Previously, Baranes was the architect for the post-911 hardening & rebuilding of a little building called the Pentagon. SCIFs, bomb-proofing, compartmentalization, etc.—the whole 9 yards. Baranes has no expertise designing ballrooms, that I could find. But he did help renovate one at the National Red Cross Headquarters once. Besides his renovation of Pentagon Wedges 2-5, he’s also done the U.S. Treasury Building modernization, and the Department of the Interior Headquarters & GSA National Headquarters renovations. It seems his talents center around building secure federal infrastructure, not event halls.

…CONCLUSION
They’re building a Stargate Command bunker under the ballroom, and they need us to buy the ballroom narrative bullsh*t in order to gin up public support to ram this through against the opposition it’s currently facing.

This facility will most likely be the nerve center hub of the new “national security” Palantir spy infrastructure and digital control grid panopticon. In short, an essential facility to continue helping to enslave us, and putting any oversight by WE THE PEOPLE beyond our control. For israel’s benefit, and the jewish global empire-national security state blob.

I don’t think so. I’m America First & Only, and israel/ballroom LAST.

link

Clinton introduces George Soros to USA politics

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

A Pragmatic Perspective on the Iran Conflict

Many people have requested that I outline some context on the Iran conflict; so, here it is.

What follows is my own researched perspective on the challenge that President Trump is facing.  I anticipate the non-interventionists will not be happy with it, and also the Israel First crowd will not like the brutal pragmatism of it. Alas, having spent a great deal of time watching things unfold, here’s my take.

Start with this question: Considering all the years the debate over Iran’s nuclear ambitions has persisted, why haven’t its strongest allies, China and Russia, ever provided Iran with a nuclear weapon?

Now, before anyone jumps into the nuclear non-proliferation perspective, let me remind you we are not going to pretend things here. You can pretend that Beijing didn’t give the DPRK nuclear weapons by pretending that North Korea isn’t a proxy province of China. Or you can stop pretending. The choice is yours!

So, what’s different?  Well, in the DPRK example, Beijing holds the control mechanism.  For Iran, giving religious fanatics a nuclear weapon would be tantamount to giving the Muslim Brotherhood the ability to start World War III.

As recently noted, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman urged President Trump not to back down from this moment of consequence and to eliminate the Iranian threat once and for all. MbS is about as close to a Middle East pragmatist as you can find.  In response, a desperate British Prime Minister Keir Starmer rushed to Saudi Arabia hoping to change the position of MbS.  Great Britain is almost out of fuel.

That’s a good place to start looking at the regional perspectives.

Islamic extremists, religious zealots, fanatics, cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.  Even those who are sympathetic to the Iranian regime, particularly Turkey and Qatar, are pragmatic about this issue.

Nuclear weapons must never fall into the hands of Hezbollah, Hamas, al-Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS), al-Nusra, and all of the extreme -perhaps most authentic- factions of Islam are included in that outlook.

While it is true that Israel has carried out a brutal, over-the-top, offensive against Hamas in Gaza, it is also true that Egypt – via President al-Sisi, spent two years destroying Hamas terror tunnels on the Egyptian-Gaza border and installed a five-layer security perimeter to keep the Islamist “Palestinians” out of the Sinai.

President Sisi (Egypt) and King Abdullah (Jordan) do not want to import Palestinian Hamas promoters, despite their very public opposition to the offensive methods of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

♦ The Muslim Brotherhood represents the political face of extremist (authentic) Islam.  Turkish President Recep Erdogan is one of the zookeepers keeping the big cat cages under control, while simultaneously using the big cats to draw an audience.

Qatar is the banking side of The Muslim Brotherhood, feeding the big cats and providing them indulgences to keep them satiated.  The intelligence services of Israel (Mossad) and the USA (CIA) are involved in this process.

When it comes to authentic Islam, you might say that essentially Mossad and the CIA are the physical cages, while Turkey (Recep Erdogan) and Qatar (Amir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani) are the zookeepers.

Turkey the gateway to Europe, is a NATO member not a NATO ally. Qatar has a foot in both the lawfully constrained western world and a foot in the religious fanaticism world.  While the tightrope walking might seem difficult both Turkish President Recep Erdogan and Qatari Amir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani have navigated this dynamic as part of their own influence and affluence operation.

That said, none of the names involved thus far want the rabid faction of the big cats to get a nuclear weapon.  President Donald Trump does not want the rabid cats to get a nuclear weapon.  None of the voices in the Middle East, sans the fanatical Iranian religious faction, want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.

All of these various regional players have their own individual nuance to retain influence and power.  However, on the issue of nuclear weapons they all agree – Iran must never have them, because Iran would represent the biggest threat in the entire world to using them.  [Name a weapon that Iran has never used.]

None of Iran’s allies – not Pakistan, not Russia and not China – would ever fathom giving Iran a nuclear weapon, because the leadership of Iran is sketchy, unstable and, well, potentially batsh!t crazy enough to use it.  The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are just as zero-sum minded as the Islamic clerics they protect.

This accurate and factual baseline of common interest is why you do not see any of the regional voices opposing President Trump’s effort to ensure that Iran NEVER HAS a nuclear weapon?

How strong is that sense of common interest?…  Strong enough to accept Israel bombing Iran in support of that common interest.  Turkey, aligned in sympathetic voice with the Muslim Brotherhood, hates Israel; but they hate Israel slightly less than they hate the thought of Iran having a nuclear weapon.

So, against the backdrop of Iran rejecting any deal that precludes them from having a nuclear weapon, where does that leave things?

It leaves the entire Middle East in a position to continue supporting President Trump’s effort to stop Iran from ever having a nuclear weapon.  It really is that simple.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, The UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and yes, even Qatar, are willing to endure a considerable amount of economic pain and internal friction in order to get to the place where Iran stops their nuclear objective.

It’s the Iranian nuclear threat that’s the problem.  It’s the Iranian nuclear threat that has always been the problem.

This time, President Donald J Trump is trying to deal with that threat once and for all.

Europe is going bananas because they need oil/gas. The U.K is going bananas because they need oil/gas. Asia is really in a bad place because they too need oil/gas.  The energy problem goes all the way to Australia because they too need oil/gas.

The more a nation chased the net-zero carbon, climate change, global warming nonsense, the more they are exposed to the dire Straits of Hormuz.  Japan can hold out a little longer with reserves and China can ultimately make do with Russian provision.

Which brings us to the point where President Trump is saying the U.S. will end up having to control the Strait of Hormuz, and we should look for an extension to the Russian sanction relief as a direct consequence of Iran rejecting the terms of JD Vance and the USA delegation.

Now, there are some who claim that Iran doesn’t want a nuclear weapon, and/or Iran has a fatwa against nuclear weapons.  These voices are ridiculous.  Think about the irrational logic of the claim: Iran is refusing to stop pursuing something they do not want.

♦ It can be argued that Israel is being opportunistic and leveraging the regional support for Trump toward their own interests and objectives.  It is a fair criticism to say the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu is too militaristic and aggressive.  Israel’s continually aggressive posture makes it difficult to navigate the nuances of strong diplomacy.

In fact, both President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have stated the goals and objectives of the USA and Israel may not be aligned on all matters, and Turkish President Erdogan has been exceptionally critical of Israel’s continued military operation into Lebanon, presumably targeting Hezbollah.

However, there is no indication that Israel is directing President Trump on the issue of a denuclearized Iran.

On the issue of Iran never having nuclear weapons, it has been the stated policy of every U.S. administration for 40+ years, and on that issue the entire Middle East is in agreement.

link

This ‘pragmatic’ position seems to be refuted by Trump tearing up an existing agreement with Iran, which gave him everything he now purports to want; and twice attacking Iran in the midst of promising negotiations, acts which have needlessly damaged USA’s reputation with allies and enemies alike. I am posting this essay so readers can see all points of view. There may be other considerations besides what is publicly known for Trump’s aggressive and seemingly militarily foolish moves. I respect Sundance, the author of the above piece, but am also well aware that he has a blind spot when it comes to Israel and Jewish Supremacist infiltration of USA. I have reposted his entire essay with his permission. ABN

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN