#usurpation — Public Fediverse posts

Why did Tulsi retire? — Emerald Robinson

Why did Tulsi retire?

1) Several sources confirm: Ratcliffe’s CIA did take back boxes of files from Tulsi’s ODNI.

2) A number of ODNI agents have been threatened by Ratcliffe’s CIA with being investigated themselves for looking into matters the CIA considers “off-limits.” 

3) I was contacted recently because Tulsi wanted to talk with me. That meeting was stopped by Tulsi’s chief of staff @alexahenning I’m told.

4) I’m also told: There’s an open war inside the US government between CIA & ODNI that has now reached the White House. 

@alexahenning 5) Several members of ODNI were recently removed (or quit) who were integral to investigations into election fraud & voting machines. Their role was to verify the technical accuracy of voting data. Without their expertise, these election fraud investigations could be halted. 

@alexahenning 6) In Oct. 2025, the infamous Dominion Voting Systems was “purchased” by a new entity: Liberty Vote USA. Details of that sale were kept private.

This appears to be a simple name-change, according to my sources.

That means: Dominion will operate as usual in upcoming elections. 

link

Elise Stefanik rumored to be top candidate for Director of National Intelligence

link

Mitch Snow blew up that op by randomly stumbling across the high-profile planning meeting at Fort Huachuca. Mitch was literally the one unaccounted-for variable in this entire equation.

From the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina on the Constitutional Convention of 1789: ‘There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew’

Excerpt from the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina, of the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1789, regarding the statement of Benjamin Franklin, at the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration.

“There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are oppressed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate-namely, that they were driven out of their motherland. But gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires cannot live on other vampires, they cannot live among themselves; and they must live among Christians others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States, by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the jews are not excluded within 200 years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the jews while they remain in the counting house gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions-they should be excluded by the Constitution.”

~Original of this copy in Franklin Institute Philadelphia, Pa.

link

From the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina on the Constitutional Convention of 1789: ‘There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew’

Excerpt from the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina, of the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1789, regarding the statement of Benjamin Franklin, at the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration.

“There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are oppressed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate-namely, that they were driven out of their motherland. But gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires cannot live on other vampires, they cannot live among themselves; and they must live among Christians others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States, by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the jews are not excluded within 200 years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the jews while they remain in the counting house gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions-they should be excluded by the Constitution.”

~Original of this copy in Franklin Institute Philadelphia, Pa.

link

From the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina on the Constitutional Convention of 1789: ‘There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew’

Excerpt from the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina, of the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1789, regarding the statement of Benjamin Franklin at the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration.

“There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are oppressed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate-namely, that they were driven out of their motherland. But gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires cannot live on other vampires, they cannot live among themselves; and they must live among Christians others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States, by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the jews are not excluded within 200 years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the jews while they remain in the counting house gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions-they should be excluded by the Constitution.”

~Original of this copy in Franklin Institute Philadelphia, Pa.

link

From the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina on the Constitutional Convention of 1789: ‘There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew’

Excerpt from the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina, of the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1789, regarding the statement of Benjamin Franklin, at the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration.

“There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are oppressed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate-namely, that they were driven out of their motherland. But gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires cannot live on other vampires, they cannot live among themselves; and they must live among Christians others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States, by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the jews are not excluded within 200 years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the jews while they remain in the counting house gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions-they should be excluded by the Constitution.”

~Original of this copy in Franklin Institute Philadelphia, Pa.

link

From the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina on the Constitutional Convention of 1789: ‘There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew’

Excerpt from the Journal of Charles Pickney of South Carolina, of the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1789, regarding the statement of Benjamin Franklin, at the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration.

“There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are oppressed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate-namely, that they were driven out of their motherland. But gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires cannot live on other vampires, they cannot live among themselves; and they must live among Christians others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States, by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the jews are not excluded within 200 years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the jews while they remain in the counting house gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the jews forever, your children and your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions-they should be excluded by the Constitution.”

~Original of this copy in Franklin Institute Philadelphia, Pa.

link

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAH56ecbE4

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

Villains of Judea: Charles Bronfman — A deep dive into how Charles Bronfman and his family shaped a century of shadow politics.

…In the final accounting, Charles Bronfman is not merely a man of wealth, but a pillar of a shadow-governance structure that has rendered the traditional legislative bodies obsolete. Our elected officials have been reduced to mere stage actors, reciting lines written by an unelected inner circle of organized Jewish interests that treat sovereign nations like proprietary assets. As the Epstein files continue to strip away the veneer of legitimacy from the elite, we are forced to confront an undeniable reality: the levers of state have been seized by a cohesive Jewish network whose loyalties reside solely within their tribe. Recognizing this hostile architecture is the prerequisite for the struggle ahead—a definitive political confrontation, Gentile versus Jew, that is the only path to reclaiming our country.

…The Founding of the Mega Group

In 1991, Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, founder of The Limited and Victoria’s Secret, co-founded what they called the “Study Group.” The innocuous name concealed something far more significant. This was an invitation-only club of approximately 20 of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish businesspeople in America, a number that would eventually swell to nearly 50 by 2001.

The group became publicly known as the Mega Group after a Wall Street Journal investigative report in May 1998, headlined “Titans of Industry Join Forces To Work for Jewish Philanthropy,” pulled back the curtain on its existence. Annual dues reportedly ran approximately $30,000. Members met twice a year for two-day seminars on philanthropy and Jewish identity. But the guest list alone suggested this was no ordinary study circle.

Members included Les Wexner, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Bronfman Sr., Max Fisher, Michael Steinhardt, Leonard Abramson, Harvey Meyerhoff, Laurence Tisch, Charles Schusterman, Lester Crown, Ronald Lauder, Marvin Lender, and Hollywood director Steven Spielberg. These were men who controlled billions in personal wealth and sat on the boards of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America.

Bronfman’s 1998 Wall Street Journal comment, “From the beginning, we didn’t want to be seen as a threat to anybody… We don’t want to be seen as the Sanhedrin,” functioned as a classic tactical admission. By explicitly citing the ancient Jewish governing body as the image he sought to avoid, he inadvertently confirmed that such a structure of Jewish influence was indeed the functional reality he managed.

link

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN

The founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation vs the current executive director of the Electronic Freedom Foundation

link

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit group founded in 1990 by Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore, and John Perry Barlow to defend civil liberties in the digital world. 

Status: Headquartered in San Francisco, the EFF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with a staff of approximately 125 (as of 2025) and over 40,000 members, often described as the “online equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union.” 

Mission: The EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. 

Key Activities: The organization fights illegal surveillance, defends free speech online, challenges restrictive copyright laws, and develops privacy-enhancing tools like Privacy Badger and Certbot. 

__________

Looks like classic infiltrate–takeover–invert the org 180 degrees. Virtually every institution in USA and the West has met this fate. It is ideological asymmetric warfare, parasitism, and political ponerology all rolled into one. ABN

https://www.europesays.com/be-fr/50183/ « Une femme en a été victime », explique Marie, la fille de l’ancien bourgmestre de Thuin #ancien #BE #BEFr #Belgique #Belgium #bourgmestre #été #explique #famille #Femme #fille #Furlan #identité #marié #réseaux #sociaux #Thuin #Une #usurpation #Victime

https://www.europesays.com/ch-fr/53789/ « Koh-Lanta » accusé de tricherie suite à sa nouvelle règle, Denis Brogniart brise le silence de TF1 #Banque #CarteBancaire #Divertissement #Entertainment #Escroquerie #EscroquerieàLaCarteBancaire #illustration #Suisse #telephone #TéléphoneMobile #Television #usurpation #UsurpationD'identité

un fraudeur pris en flagrant délit dans le RER D

L’infraction est courante, mais celle-ci va envoyer un jeune fraudeur devant le tribunal. Un homme contrôlé à bord…
#Nice #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #actu #Actualités #AttentatàNice #carted'identité #europe #FilInfo #nice #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #Républiquefrançaise #usurpation
https://www.europesays.com/fr/707002/

https://www.europesays.com/fr/707002/ un fraudeur pris en flagrant délit dans le RER D #actu #Actualités #AttentatàNice #CarteD'identité #EU #europe #FilInfo #FR #France #News #nice #ProvenceAlpesCôteD'Azur #RépubliqueFrançaise #usurpation

Richard Marlet, Ancien du 36 Quai des Orfèvres, dénonce deux livres publiés sous son nom https://actualitte.com/a/bYLQAtzb #usurpation #identite #edition #publications #police #quaidesorfevres #RichardMarlet #contrefacon

L'Arcep lance une enquête : les opérateurs de téléphonie ne lutteraient pas assez contre les usurpations de numéros http://dlvr.it/TQfn1P #usurpation #téléphone

L'Arcep lance une enquête : les opérateurs de téléphonie ne lutteraient pas assez contre les usurpations de numéros http://dlvr.it/TQfn1P #usurpation #téléphone

L'Arcep lance une enquête : les opérateurs de téléphonie ne lutteraient pas assez contre les usurpations de numéros http://dlvr.it/TQfn1P #usurpation #téléphone

L'Arcep lance une enquête : les opérateurs de téléphonie ne lutteraient pas assez contre les usurpations de numéros http://dlvr.it/TQfn1P #usurpation #téléphone

L'Arcep lance une enquête : les opérateurs de téléphonie ne lutteraient pas assez contre les usurpations de numéros http://dlvr.it/TQfn1P #usurpation #téléphone

Usurpation de numéros : ce qui va changer au 1er janvier 2026 !
https://mac4ever.com/193431
#Mac4Ever #Arcep #Usurpation

Usurpation de numéros : ce qui va changer au 1er janvier 2026 !
https://mac4ever.com/193431
#Mac4Ever #Arcep #Usurpation

Usurpation de numéros : ce qui va changer au 1er janvier 2026 !
https://mac4ever.com/193431
#Mac4Ever #Arcep #Usurpation

#Usurpation de numéro : le pansement de l’ #Arcep pour limiter le #spam téléphonique

Les spams téléphoniques et usurpations de numéro se multiplient à grande vitesse. Les opérateurs ont déployé des protections avec le Mécanisme d’Authentification des Numéros (MAN), mais des appels en roaming passent à travers les mailles du filet. L’Arcep demande désormais aux opérateurs de « masquer le numéro mobile non authentifié d’un appel provenant de l’étranger ».

https://next.ink/212477/usurpation-de-numero-le-pansement-de-larcep-pour-limiter-le-spam-telephonique/

#Usurpation de numéro : le pansement de l’ #Arcep pour limiter le #spam téléphonique

Les spams téléphoniques et usurpations de numéro se multiplient à grande vitesse. Les opérateurs ont déployé des protections avec le Mécanisme d’Authentification des Numéros (MAN), mais des appels en roaming passent à travers les mailles du filet. L’Arcep demande désormais aux opérateurs de « masquer le numéro mobile non authentifié d’un appel provenant de l’étranger ».

https://next.ink/212477/usurpation-de-numero-le-pansement-de-larcep-pour-limiter-le-spam-telephonique/

#Usurpation de numéro : le pansement de l’ #Arcep pour limiter le #spam téléphonique

Les spams téléphoniques et usurpations de numéro se multiplient à grande vitesse. Les opérateurs ont déployé des protections avec le Mécanisme d’Authentification des Numéros (MAN), mais des appels en roaming passent à travers les mailles du filet. L’Arcep demande désormais aux opérateurs de « masquer le numéro mobile non authentifié d’un appel provenant de l’étranger ».

https://next.ink/212477/usurpation-de-numero-le-pansement-de-larcep-pour-limiter-le-spam-telephonique/

#Usurpation de numéro : le pansement de l’ #Arcep pour limiter le #spam téléphonique

Les spams téléphoniques et usurpations de numéro se multiplient à grande vitesse. Les opérateurs ont déployé des protections avec le Mécanisme d’Authentification des Numéros (MAN), mais des appels en roaming passent à travers les mailles du filet. L’Arcep demande désormais aux opérateurs de « masquer le numéro mobile non authentifié d’un appel provenant de l’étranger ».

https://next.ink/212477/usurpation-de-numero-le-pansement-de-larcep-pour-limiter-le-spam-telephonique/

Danielle Smith uses notwithstanding clause to declare herself premier of B.C.

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/11/danielle-smith-uses-notwithstanding-clause-to-declare-herself-premier-of-b-c/

Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en

Après 96 jours de détention, Eddie Goujit a été remis en liberté lundi 17 novembre 2025, selon les informations de BFM…
#Toulon #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #europe #hyères #jeune #Liberté #municipales #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #remis #Républiquefrançaise #toulon #usurpation
https://www.europesays.com/fr/556447/

https://www.europesays.com/fr/556447/ Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #EU #europe #FR #France #hyères #jeune #Liberté #municipales #News #ProvenceAlpesCôteD'Azur #remis #RépubliqueFrançaise #toulon #usurpation

Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en

Après 96 jours de détention, Eddie Goujit a été remis en liberté lundi 17 novembre 2025, selon les informations de BFM…
#Toulon #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #europe #jeune #Liberté #municipales #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #remis #Républiquefrançaise #seyne #toulon #usurpation
https://www.europesays.com/fr/556331/

https://www.europesays.com/fr/556331/ Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #EU #europe #FR #France #jeune #Liberté #municipales #News #ProvenceAlpesCôteD'Azur #remis #RépubliqueFrançaise #seyne #toulon #usurpation

Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en

Après 96 jours de détention, Eddie Goujit a été remis en liberté lundi 17 novembre 2025, selon les informations de BFM…
#Toulon #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #europe #golfe #jeune #Liberté #municipales #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #remis #Républiquefrançaise #Saint #toulon #tropez #usurpation
https://www.europesays.com/fr/551642/

https://www.europesays.com/fr/551642/ Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #EU #europe #FR #France #golfe #jeune #Liberté #municipales #News #ProvenceAlpesCôteD'Azur #remis #RépubliqueFrançaise #Saint #toulon #tropez #usurpation

Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en

Après 96 jours de détention, Eddie Goujit a été remis en liberté lundi 17 novembre 2025, selon les informations de BFM…
#Toulon #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #europe #jeune #Liberté #municipales #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #remis #Républiquefrançaise #toulon #usurpation
https://www.europesays.com/fr/545651/

https://www.europesays.com/fr/545651/ Un jeune candidat aux municipales à Toulon accusé d’escroquerie et d’usurpation remis en #accuse #actu #Actualités #candidat #Escroquerie #EU #europe #FR #France #jeune #Liberté #municipales #News #ProvenceAlpesCôteD'Azur #remis #RépubliqueFrançaise #toulon #usurpation