#pragmatism — Public Fediverse posts

Errer ensemble : doute, commun et action sans garantie

De James à Nancy, de Serres à Benjamin, du pragmatisme à l’écologie politique : le doute n’est ni renoncement ni alibi. Il devient une force d’enquête, d’invention et de partage. Agir sans fondement ultime, apprendre par essai‑erreur, protéger les vulnérables et construire un commun qui ne cesse de se reformuler. #Pragmatism #Uncertainty #Commons #Ecology #Degrowth #SituatedKnowledge #CriticalTheory #Democracy…

https://homohortus31.wordpress.com/2026/09/19/errer-ensemble-doute-commun-et-action-sans-garantie/

Errer ensemble : doute, commun et action sans garantie

De James à Nancy, de Serres à Benjamin, du pragmatisme à l’écologie politique : le doute n’est ni renoncement ni alibi. Il devient une force d’enquête, d’invention et de partage. Agir sans fondement ultime, apprendre par essai‑erreur, protéger les vulnérables et construire un commun qui ne cesse de se reformuler. #Pragmatism #Uncertainty #Commons #Ecology #Degrowth #SituatedKnowledge #CriticalTheory #Democracy…

https://homohortus31.wordpress.com/2026/09/19/errer-ensemble-doute-commun-et-action-sans-garantie/

Errer ensemble : doute, commun et action sans garantie

De James à Nancy, de Serres à Benjamin, du pragmatisme à l’écologie politique : le doute n’est ni renoncement ni alibi. Il devient une force d’enquête, d’invention et de partage. Agir sans fondement ultime, apprendre par essai‑erreur, protéger les vulnérables et construire un commun qui ne cesse de se reformuler. #Pragmatism #Uncertainty #Commons #Ecology #Degrowth #SituatedKnowledge #CriticalTheory #Democracy…

https://homohortus31.wordpress.com/2026/09/19/errer-ensemble-doute-commun-et-action-sans-garantie/

Errer ensemble : doute, commun et action sans garantie

De James à Nancy, de Serres à Benjamin, du pragmatisme à l’écologie politique : le doute n’est ni renoncement ni alibi. Il devient une force d’enquête, d’invention et de partage. Agir sans fondement ultime, apprendre par essai‑erreur, protéger les vulnérables et construire un commun qui ne cesse de se reformuler. #Pragmatism #Uncertainty #Commons #Ecology #Degrowth #SituatedKnowledge #CriticalTheory #Democracy…

https://homohortus31.wordpress.com/2026/09/19/errer-ensemble-doute-commun-et-action-sans-garantie/

Errer ensemble : doute, commun et action sans garantie

De James à Nancy, de Serres à Benjamin, du pragmatisme à l’écologie politique : le doute n’est ni renoncement ni alibi. Il devient une force d’enquête, d’invention et de partage. Agir sans fondement ultime, apprendre par essai‑erreur, protéger les vulnérables et construire un commun qui ne cesse de se reformuler. #Pragmatism #Uncertainty #Commons #Ecology #Degrowth #SituatedKnowledge #CriticalTheory #Democracy…

https://homohortus31.wordpress.com/2026/09/19/errer-ensemble-doute-commun-et-action-sans-garantie/

Q: If the UK doesn’t produce the oil and gas, won’t somebody else simply produce it and sell it to us?
A: No. How come you ask?

https://climateuncensored.com/there-is-no-atmospheric-exemption-for-british-oil-and-gas/ by Kevin Anderson @kevinclimate.bsky.social

#Jackdaw #Rosebank #UKPol #UKPolitics #NorthSea #gasFields #extraction #oilAndGas #influence #pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateChange #politics

Q: If the UK doesn’t produce the oil and gas, won’t somebody else simply produce it and sell it to us?
A: No. How come you ask?

https://climateuncensored.com/there-is-no-atmospheric-exemption-for-british-oil-and-gas/ by Kevin Anderson @kevinclimate.bsky.social

#Jackdaw #Rosebank #UKPol #UKPolitics #NorthSea #gasFields #extraction #oilAndGas #influence #pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateChange #politics

Q: If the UK doesn’t produce the oil and gas, won’t somebody else simply produce it and sell it to us?
A: No. How come you ask?

https://climateuncensored.com/there-is-no-atmospheric-exemption-for-british-oil-and-gas/ by Kevin Anderson @kevinclimate.bsky.social

#Jackdaw #Rosebank #UKPol #UKPolitics #NorthSea #gasFields #extraction #oilAndGas #influence #pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateChange #politics

Q: If the UK doesn’t produce the oil and gas, won’t somebody else simply produce it and sell it to us?
A: No. How come you ask?

https://climateuncensored.com/there-is-no-atmospheric-exemption-for-british-oil-and-gas/ by Kevin Anderson @kevinclimate.bsky.social

#Jackdaw #Rosebank #UKPol #UKPolitics #NorthSea #gasFields #extraction #oilAndGas #influence #pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateChange #politics

Q: If the UK doesn’t produce the oil and gas, won’t somebody else simply produce it and sell it to us?
A: No. How come you ask?

https://climateuncensored.com/there-is-no-atmospheric-exemption-for-british-oil-and-gas/ by Kevin Anderson @kevinclimate.bsky.social

#Jackdaw #Rosebank #UKPol #UKPolitics #NorthSea #gasFields #extraction #oilAndGas #influence #pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateChange #politics

In the current crisis involving the Strait of Hormuz, the United Arab Emirates is advocating for a pragmatic approach toward Iran. Lana Nusseibeh, the Minister... https://news.osna.fm/?p=63156 | #news #advocates #iran #maintaining #pragmatism

In the current crisis involving the Strait of Hormuz, the United Arab Emirates is advocating for a pragmatic approach toward Iran. Lana Nusseibeh, the Minister... https://news.osna.fm/?p=63156 | #news #advocates #iran #maintaining #pragmatism

In the current crisis involving the Strait of Hormuz, the United Arab Emirates is advocating for a pragmatic approach toward Iran. Lana Nusseibeh, the Minister... https://news.osna.fm/?p=63156 | #news #advocates #iran #maintaining #pragmatism

In the current crisis involving the Strait of Hormuz, the United Arab Emirates is advocating for a pragmatic approach toward Iran. Lana Nusseibeh, the Minister... https://news.osna.fm/?p=63156 | #news #advocates #iran #maintaining #pragmatism

In the current crisis involving the Strait of Hormuz, the United Arab Emirates is advocating for a pragmatic approach toward Iran. Lana Nusseibeh, the Minister... https://news.osna.fm/?p=63156 | #news #advocates #iran #maintaining #pragmatism

Farmers and ranchers to have the RIGHT RETUREND TO THEM to process their own produce and sell it

And consumers will have the right to buy that food RETURNED TO THEM. These rights do not belong to the government. Growing and selling your own food is an inalienable right. Period. ABN

Farmers and ranchers to have the RIGHT RETUREND TO THEM to process their own produce and sell it

And consumers will have the right to buy that food RETURNED TO THEM. These rights do not belong to the government. Growing and selling your own food is an inalienable right. Period. ABN

Farmers and ranchers to have the RIGHT RETUREND TO THEM to process their own produce and sell it

And consumers will have the right to buy that food RETURNED TO THEM. These rights do not belong to the government. Growing and selling your own food is an inalienable right. Period. ABN

Farmers and ranchers to have the RIGHT RETUREND TO THEM to process their own produce and sell it

And consumers will have the right to buy that food RETURNED TO THEM. These rights do not belong to the government. Growing and selling your own food is an inalienable right. Period. ABN

Farmers and ranchers to have the RIGHT RETUREND TO THEM to process their own produce and sell it

And consumers will have the right to buy that food RETURNED TO THEM. These rights do not belong to the government. Growing and selling your own food is an inalienable right. Period. ABN

Currently editing audio for a Patreon 'exclusive' which we may share publicly later, short essay and podcast about Idealism versus Pragmatism. Paying supporters only for now, you can support our work and let @solarpunkpresents know what you think about the ideas discussed!

If you can't support us you can listen to the podcast episode on the topic for the public: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#podcast #writing #essay #opinion #idealism #pragmatism #nowplaying #solarpunk #ideals #Philosophy #debate

Currently editing audio for a Patreon 'exclusive' which we may share publicly later, short essay and podcast about Idealism versus Pragmatism. Paying supporters only for now, you can support our work and let @solarpunkpresents know what you think about the ideas discussed!

If you can't support us you can listen to the podcast episode on the topic for the public: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#podcast #writing #essay #opinion #idealism #pragmatism #nowplaying #solarpunk #ideals #Philosophy #debate

Currently editing audio for a Patreon 'exclusive' which we may share publicly later, short essay and podcast about Idealism versus Pragmatism. Paying supporters only for now, you can support our work and let @solarpunkpresents know what you think about the ideas discussed!

If you can't support us you can listen to the podcast episode on the topic for the public: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#podcast #writing #essay #opinion #idealism #pragmatism #nowplaying #solarpunk #ideals #Philosophy #debate

Currently editing audio for a Patreon 'exclusive' which we may share publicly later, short essay and podcast about Idealism versus Pragmatism. Paying supporters only for now, you can support our work and let @solarpunkpresents know what you think about the ideas discussed!

If you can't support us you can listen to the podcast episode on the topic for the public: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#podcast #writing #essay #opinion #idealism #pragmatism #nowplaying #solarpunk #ideals #Philosophy #debate

Currently editing audio for a Patreon 'exclusive' which we may share publicly later, short essay and podcast about Idealism versus Pragmatism. Paying supporters only for now, you can support our work and let @solarpunkpresents know what you think about the ideas discussed!

If you can't support us you can listen to the podcast episode on the topic for the public: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#podcast #writing #essay #opinion #idealism #pragmatism #nowplaying #solarpunk #ideals #Philosophy #debate

Motivational speaker: "Don't focus on negative thoughts. Instead, embrace positive ideas!"

Me: "Don't tell me what to do!"

😜

#motivational #happythoughts #rebelgirl #stubborn #pragmatism #anarchy #freethinker

Motivational speaker: "Don't focus on negative thoughts. Instead, embrace positive ideas!"

Me: "Don't tell me what to do!"

😜

#motivational #happythoughts #rebelgirl #stubborn #pragmatism #anarchy #freethinker

Motivational speaker: "Don't focus on negative thoughts. Instead, embrace positive ideas!"

Me: "Don't tell me what to do!"

😜

#motivational #happythoughts #rebelgirl #stubborn #pragmatism #anarchy #freethinker

Motivational speaker: "Don't focus on negative thoughts. Instead, embrace positive ideas!"

Me: "Don't tell me what to do!"

😜

#motivational #happythoughts #rebelgirl #stubborn #pragmatism #anarchy #freethinker

Motivational speaker: "Don't focus on negative thoughts. Instead, embrace positive ideas!"

Me: "Don't tell me what to do!"

😜

#motivational #happythoughts #rebelgirl #stubborn #pragmatism #anarchy #freethinker

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

link

Maybe it’s just me, but I have always thought these findings were extremely obvious. What is obvious is not just facial expressions. The same rough analysis applies to tone of voice, word choice, gesture, body language, perceived meaning, pragmatics of speaking and everything else involving interpersonal communication. For these reasons, I developed the FIML technique. FIML reduces the ‘irreducible complexity’1 of human interactions by examining small bits of interpersonal communications in real-time, real-world situations. Perfect communication between two humans (the smallest unit) is not possible. BUT, much better communication IS. FIML is not hard to do if you have a good partner who can understand why it is necessary. The world is a lonely place and good partners are rare mainly because interpersonal human understanding is really bad, frightfully so. If you do FIML, everything will be better for you. ABN

1. See A theory of FIML ↩︎

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

link

Maybe it’s just me, but I have always thought these findings were extremely obvious. What is obvious is not just facial expressions. The same rough analysis applies to tone of voice, word choice, gesture, body language, perceived meaning, pragmatics of speaking and everything else involving interpersonal communication. For these reasons, I developed the FIML technique. FIML reduces the ‘irreducible complexity’1 of human interactions by examining small bits of interpersonal communications in real-time, real-world situations. Perfect communication between two humans (the smallest unit) is not possible. BUT, much better communication IS. FIML is not hard to do if you have a good partner who can understand why it is necessary. The world is a lonely place and good partners are rare mainly because interpersonal human understanding is really bad, frightfully so. If you do FIML, everything will be better for you. ABN

1. See A theory of FIML ↩︎

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

link

Maybe it’s just me, but I have always thought these findings were extremely obvious. What is obvious is not just facial expressions. The same rough analysis applies to tone of voice, word choice, gesture, body language, perceived meaning, pragmatics of speaking and everything else involving interpersonal communication. For these reasons, I developed the FIML technique. FIML reduces the ‘irreducible complexity’1 of human interactions by examining small bits of interpersonal communications in real-time, real-world situations. Perfect communication between two humans (the smallest unit) is not possible. BUT, much better communication IS. FIML is not hard to do if you have a good partner who can understand why it is necessary. The world is a lonely place and good partners are rare mainly because interpersonal human understanding is really bad, frightfully so. If you do FIML, everything will be better for you. ABN

1. See A theory of FIML ↩︎

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

link

Maybe it’s just me, but I have always thought these findings were extremely obvious. What is obvious is not just facial expressions. The same rough analysis applies to tone of voice, word choice, gesture, body language, perceived meaning, pragmatics of speaking and everything else involving interpersonal communication. For these reasons, I developed the FIML technique. FIML reduces the ‘irreducible complexity’1 of human interactions by examining small bits of interpersonal communications in real-time, real-world situations. Perfect communication between two humans (the smallest unit) is not possible. BUT, much better communication IS. FIML is not hard to do if you have a good partner who can understand why it is necessary. The world is a lonely place and good partners are rare mainly because interpersonal human understanding is really bad, frightfully so. If you do FIML, everything will be better for you. ABN

1. See A theory of FIML ↩︎

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

link

Maybe it’s just me, but I have always thought these findings were extremely obvious. What is obvious is not just facial expressions. The same rough analysis applies to tone of voice, word choice, gesture, body language, perceived meaning, pragmatics of speaking and everything else involving interpersonal communication. For these reasons, I developed the FIML technique. FIML reduces the ‘irreducible complexity’1 of human interactions by examining small bits of interpersonal communications in real-time, real-world situations. Perfect communication between two humans (the smallest unit) is not possible. BUT, much better communication IS. FIML is not hard to do if you have a good partner who can understand why it is necessary. The world is a lonely place and good partners are rare mainly because interpersonal human understanding is really bad, frightfully so. If you do FIML, everything will be better for you. ABN

1. See A theory of FIML ↩︎

Have you tuned in to our latest episode yet? In it, @xtinadlr, @fastfrwrd and @arielkroon discuss #idealism and #pragmatism - and #incrementalism, too.

We spend the first part of the episode defining terms and discussing examples, then we dive into the second half where we talk about how we think these ideas might apply (or don't) to #solarpunk.

Take a listen here: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#SolarpunkPresentsPodcast #episode #season8 #discussion #podcast

Have you tuned in to our latest episode yet? In it, @xtinadlr, @fastfrwrd and @arielkroon discuss #idealism and #pragmatism - and #incrementalism, too.

We spend the first part of the episode defining terms and discussing examples, then we dive into the second half where we talk about how we think these ideas might apply (or don't) to #solarpunk.

Take a listen here: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#SolarpunkPresentsPodcast #episode #season8 #discussion #podcast

Have you tuned in to our latest episode yet? In it, @xtinadlr, @fastfrwrd and @arielkroon discuss #idealism and #pragmatism - and #incrementalism, too.

We spend the first part of the episode defining terms and discussing examples, then we dive into the second half where we talk about how we think these ideas might apply (or don't) to #solarpunk.

Take a listen here: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#SolarpunkPresentsPodcast #episode #season8 #discussion #podcast

Have you tuned in to our latest episode yet? In it, @xtinadlr, @fastfrwrd and @arielkroon discuss #idealism and #pragmatism - and #incrementalism, too.

We spend the first part of the episode defining terms and discussing examples, then we dive into the second half where we talk about how we think these ideas might apply (or don't) to #solarpunk.

Take a listen here: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#SolarpunkPresentsPodcast #episode #season8 #discussion #podcast

Have you tuned in to our latest episode yet? In it, @xtinadlr, @fastfrwrd and @arielkroon discuss #idealism and #pragmatism - and #incrementalism, too.

We spend the first part of the episode defining terms and discussing examples, then we dive into the second half where we talk about how we think these ideas might apply (or don't) to #solarpunk.

Take a listen here: https://shows.acast.com/solarpunk-presents/episodes/810-solarpunk-presents-idealism-versus-pragmatism

#SolarpunkPresentsPodcast #episode #season8 #discussion #podcast

'We identify how narratives of “pragmatism” are used by politicians... to promote incremental rather than transformative change, to defend fossil fuel companies, and to dismiss “extreme” calls for a more rapid climate transition'.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03987-4

#pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateAction #climateChange #politics #UKPol

'We identify how narratives of “pragmatism” are used by politicians... to promote incremental rather than transformative change, to defend fossil fuel companies, and to dismiss “extreme” calls for a more rapid climate transition'.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03987-4

#pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateAction #climateChange #politics #UKPol

'We identify how narratives of “pragmatism” are used by politicians... to promote incremental rather than transformative change, to defend fossil fuel companies, and to dismiss “extreme” calls for a more rapid climate transition'.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03987-4

#pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateAction #climateChange #politics #UKPol

'We identify how narratives of “pragmatism” are used by politicians... to promote incremental rather than transformative change, to defend fossil fuel companies, and to dismiss “extreme” calls for a more rapid climate transition'.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03987-4

#pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateAction #climateChange #politics #UKPol

'We identify how narratives of “pragmatism” are used by politicians... to promote incremental rather than transformative change, to defend fossil fuel companies, and to dismiss “extreme” calls for a more rapid climate transition'.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03987-4

#pragmatism #spinning #desire #com #comStodon #climatePolicy #climateAction #climateChange #politics #UKPol

On a sunny note...

So far... a 'fair and balanced' cartoon feed today, between florid #TrumpVirus #insanity and 'better angels' of #democracy - and #DogDays

#Snoopy #rest #hope #optimism #CarpeDiem #pragmatism

On a sunny note...

So far... a 'fair and balanced' cartoon feed today, between florid #TrumpVirus #insanity and 'better angels' of #democracy - and #DogDays

#Snoopy #rest #hope #optimism #CarpeDiem #pragmatism

On a sunny note...

So far... a 'fair and balanced' cartoon feed today, between florid #TrumpVirus #insanity and 'better angels' of #democracy - and #DogDays

#Snoopy #rest #hope #optimism #CarpeDiem #pragmatism

On a sunny note...

So far... a 'fair and balanced' cartoon feed today, between florid #TrumpVirus #insanity and 'better angels' of #democracy - and #DogDays

#Snoopy #rest #hope #optimism #CarpeDiem #pragmatism

On a sunny note...

So far... a 'fair and balanced' cartoon feed today, between florid #TrumpVirus #insanity and 'better angels' of #democracy - and #DogDays

#Snoopy #rest #hope #optimism #CarpeDiem #pragmatism