#remote-viewing — Public Fediverse posts

#1285 Bob Rickard and Paul Sieveking (eds) - Fortean Times: The Journal of Strange Phenomena, No 186. John Brown Publishing Ltd, London, August 2004.

#ForteanTimes #BobRickard #PaulSieveking #RemoteViewing #BookOfTheDay

#1285 Bob Rickard and Paul Sieveking (eds) - Fortean Times: The Journal of Strange Phenomena, No 186. John Brown Publishing Ltd, London, August 2004.

#ForteanTimes #BobRickard #PaulSieveking #RemoteViewing #BookOfTheDay

1/n What is #AugmentedPsi ? Human performance metrics for any skill you can think of have wide variance until you get into higher performance percentiles. Then both variance and error bars tighten.
It's mostly the same in #RemoteViewing and #Precognition experiments. In general demographic fx are significant but small, variance wide. Things look better when your selecting for highly skilled individuals in advance. Then it gets interesting. Some skeptics will call this cheating. Of course that-

Reading the Lattice Without the Legend: Grinberg, Syntergy, and the Argument for Real Entry

A scientist walks out of his office in Mexico City on December 8, 1994, and never walks back in. The man is Jacobo Grinberg-Zylberbaum, forty-eight years old, a UNAM-trained neurophysiologist with a doctorate from New York Medical College, the author of a stack of monographs on consciousness, and the last serious researcher to claim that the human brain could be wired into a holographic substrate of reality he called the Lattice. He had spent years measuring electroencephalographic correlations between separated human subjects. Two months before he vanished, he published a paper in Physics Essays arguing that pairs of subjects, separated inside semisilent Faraday chambers fourteen and a half meters apart, showed brain activity that mirrored stimulation given to only one of them. Then he was gone. The laboratory was found. Several notes were missing. His wife, who had cause to suspect him of an affair and a documented history of violence, became a person of interest and was never charged. Mexican press cycled through the story for years. Mystics and conspiracy theorists folded the disappearance into the theory, as if the man had stepped sideways into his own hypothesis.

I want to take the legend apart and see what is left.

The Lattice, in Grinberg’s framing, refuses the picture of space that physics offers. Space, in Syntergic Theory, behaves as a high-coherence informational matrix. The brain produces what he called a “neuronal field” that interacts with the Lattice the way a film negative interacts with a beam of light, decoding a hologram. Reality, in this picture, gets read off a substrate that already contains every point in space, every moment in time, and every state of consciousness. The brain becomes one of many possible decoders. High coherence, the kind Grinberg believed he saw in expert meditators and in the Mexican curandera he studied for years (Bárbara Guerrero, known as Pachita), allowed certain brains to interact with the Lattice directly. Telepathy followed from that interaction. Remote viewing came next. Materialization, in the most extreme reading of Pachita’s psychic surgery, sat at the far end of the same continuum.

This is a beautiful theory. It is also, as stated, almost entirely unfalsifiable.

The temptation, when you encounter writing like this, is to either swallow it whole or dismiss it whole. Both responses are lazy. The work has a testable core and a metaphysical shell, and the two need to be separated before anything useful can be said about either.

The testable core is the transferred potential experiment. Two people interact for twenty minutes. They are placed in electromagnetically shielded rooms separated by a distance that rules out ordinary signaling. Only one subject of each pair is stimulated by one hundred light flashes. An EEG records evoked potentials in the stimulated subject. A second EEG records the unstimulated subject. Grinberg and his coauthors, including the theoretical physicist Amit Goswami, claimed that when the stimulated subject showed distinct evoked potentials, the nonstimulated subject showed “transferred potentials” similar to those evoked in the stimulated subject. They titled the 1994 paper “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain,” and they proposed that the brain has a macroscopic quantum component capable of nonlocal correlation across distance.

If the effect were real and robust, it would rank among the most important findings in the history of neuroscience. So what does the replication record show?

Leanna Standish and colleagues at Bastyr University and the University of Washington repeated the design in 2003 and 2004, recording simultaneous EEGs from pairs of subjects placed in sound-attenuated rooms separated by ten meters, later extending the work to fMRI. They reported small correlations in some pairs, statistically above chance, broadly consistent with Grinberg’s direction. A 2018 re-analysis by groups at IULM in Milan and the University of Padova, applying machine-learning classifiers to two pooled datasets covering forty-five pairs, found classification accuracies of 50.74 percent on the first dataset and 51.17 percent, 50.45 percent, and 51.91 percent across stimulation conditions on the second. The honest reading of those numbers is that there is, at best, a faint signal above noise, on the order of one to two percent above chance, and that the signal does not hold up under stricter analytical methods. The “one in four pairs” claim from the original paper is the kind of effect size that thins out when sample sizes grow and protocols tighten. The result might be noise. It might be small and real. The data, after thirty years, cannot tell us which.

The Lattice does not announce itself in clean experimental data. What announces itself is a smear of weakly positive results, sensitive to method, sample, and the personal coherence of the experimenters and subjects. A smear of that kind, in any other branch of biology, would be treated as a candidate artifact rather than a candidate discovery.

So where are the weak spots in Grinberg’s argument? I count five.

The first concerns decoherence. Quantum entanglement is fragile. It survives at extremely low temperatures, in highly isolated systems, in laboratories where engineers work for years to prevent contact with the surrounding environment. The human brain operates at 310 Kelvin, immersed in saltwater, packed with thermal vibration and electrochemical traffic. The mainstream physical objection to any macroscopic quantum brain is that entangled states cannot last long enough at body temperature to do anything cognitively useful. Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have proposed microtubules inside neurons as a possible shelter for such states, and that proposal has critics of its own. Grinberg borrowed the language of EPR correlation without supplying a physical mechanism that addresses decoherence at all.

Venue makes a second weakness. Physics Essays publishes heterodox work. It is peer-reviewed, but it is not Physical Review Letters. Goswami, the coauthor who supplied the quantum framework, is a theoretical physicist whose later career was spent largely outside academic physics, writing for general audiences on consciousness. David Bohm, whose Wholeness and the Implicate Order Grinberg cited as foundational, was taken seriously by working physicists in a way that Goswami’s idealist consciousness work has not been. None of this disqualifies Grinberg’s results. It does qualify the weight one should give them before independent replication settles the question.

Pachita is a third problem. Grinberg believed he was watching a high-coherence shaman manipulate the Lattice when he observed the curandera apparently materializing tissue and performing organ transplants without anesthesia. The skeptical literature on psychic surgery is well developed, going back to James Randi’s documentation of Filipino practitioners in the 1970s and 1980s. The techniques are reproducible by stage magicians using animal tissue concealed in the hand. I do not claim that Pachita was fraudulent. I claim that Grinberg’s failure to engage with that literature on his own observations was a methodological gap large enough to fall through.

A fourth weakness sits in the unfalsifiability of the Lattice itself. The transferred potential is testable. The claim that space is a holographic informational matrix decoded by the brain is, as currently stated, not testable in any sharp way. The interpretation can absorb any outcome by adjusting what counts as coherence. A theory closed to refutation has crossed out of science and into philosophy, where Bohm’s implicate order belongs and where Grinberg’s Syntergic Theory should be argued.

The fifth weakness is the disappearance, which has worked as an evidentiary force-multiplier in the opposite direction the mystics imagine. Because the man vanished, the work is treated as forbidden knowledge. Because the work is treated as forbidden, it is shielded from the ordinary correction processes of science. The romance of the vanishing has done more damage to the theory than any single critic ever could.

That is the harsh audit. Here is what survives it.

What survives is a serious twentieth-century researcher who took indigenous practitioners seriously when most of his peers would not, who designed and ran controlled experiments on a phenomenon his discipline refused to study, who published in peer-reviewed venues with a theoretical physicist as coauthor, and whose specific empirical claim of brain-to-brain correlation across electromagnetic shielding has been independently tested by university laboratories in the United States and Europe with weakly positive but unconvincing results. The Lattice as cosmology fails the audit, while the transferred potential as a research program clears it.

Which brings me to the question worth taking seriously. What would real entry into the Lattice look like, if Grinberg’s empirical claim deserves another hearing?

Entry would begin by separating Syntergic cosmology from transferred-potential empiricism, permanently. The cosmology is interesting as a philosophical proposition and belongs in the philosophy of mind, alongside Bohm, Whitehead, and the slow-burning literature on panpsychism. The empiricism is interesting as a falsifiable claim and demands the methodological rigor the original work lacked. That means preregistered protocols, pair samples in the hundreds rather than the dozens, blinded analysis, machine-learning classifiers reported with confidence intervals, datasets shared openly, and a pre-committed null hypothesis the field will accept if the signal fails to clear it. The work has been creeping in that direction for twenty years, slowly, in the parapsychology literature and in a small set of medical schools. It needs to migrate into mainstream cognitive neuroscience or it will live on the margins forever.

Mechanism comes next. Holographic metaphors are not mechanisms. A specific physical proposal must explain how two brains separated by fifteen meters of air and steel could correlate at all. Decoherence is the wall. Until someone proposes a mechanism that survives a hostile physics seminar, the empirical results, even if they hold up, will be read as artifact rather than discovery. Penrose and Hameroff at least attempted a mechanism. Grinberg never did, and the field has not done it for him in the thirty years since.

Last, we would have to give up the romance of the vanishing. Grinberg probably did not step into his own theory. The most likely reading of the available evidence is that he died in late 1994, in circumstances Mexican authorities never resolved, with attention focused on his immediate domestic situation. The investigation failed. The case remains open. As long as his disappearance functions as evidence for his theory, we are doing magical thinking under the cover of physics. A theory has to survive on its experimental record, not on the mystery of its author’s death.

Is any of this real, or possible? The transferred potential, in its weak form, might be real. The Lattice, as Grinberg drew it, is most likely not real in the literal physical sense he intended. What is real is the underlying scandal that consciousness studies were starved of funding and respectability for most of the twentieth century, that a serious researcher who tried to bring rigor to the question was treated as fringe in his own lifetime, that he disappeared before he could finish his work, and that the field has only now begun to catch up to the questions he was asking.

If we want to enter the Lattice, the entry point is methodological, not mystical. We pick up where he left off. The testable parts get tested. Cosmology stands as a working metaphor that may, or may not, be redeemed by data. Above all, we resist the temptation to make the man’s death do the work that his experiments could not finish.

That is the only honest way to read him now.

Reading the Lattice Without the Legend: Grinberg, Syntergy, and the Argument for Real Entry

A scientist walks out of his office in Mexico City on December 8, 1994, and never walks back in. The man is Jacobo Grinberg-Zylberbaum, forty-eight years old, a UNAM-trained neurophysiologist with a doctorate from New York Medical College, the author of a stack of monographs on consciousness, and the last serious researcher to claim that the human brain could be wired into a holographic substrate of reality he called the Lattice. He had spent years measuring electroencephalographic correlations between separated human subjects. Two months before he vanished, he published a paper in Physics Essays arguing that pairs of subjects, separated inside semisilent Faraday chambers fourteen and a half meters apart, showed brain activity that mirrored stimulation given to only one of them. Then he was gone. The laboratory was found. Several notes were missing. His wife, who had cause to suspect him of an affair and a documented history of violence, became a person of interest and was never charged. Mexican press cycled through the story for years. Mystics and conspiracy theorists folded the disappearance into the theory, as if the man had stepped sideways into his own hypothesis.

I want to take the legend apart and see what is left.

The Lattice, in Grinberg’s framing, refuses the picture of space that physics offers. Space, in Syntergic Theory, behaves as a high-coherence informational matrix. The brain produces what he called a “neuronal field” that interacts with the Lattice the way a film negative interacts with a beam of light, decoding a hologram. Reality, in this picture, gets read off a substrate that already contains every point in space, every moment in time, and every state of consciousness. The brain becomes one of many possible decoders. High coherence, the kind Grinberg believed he saw in expert meditators and in the Mexican curandera he studied for years (Bárbara Guerrero, known as Pachita), allowed certain brains to interact with the Lattice directly. Telepathy followed from that interaction. Remote viewing came next. Materialization, in the most extreme reading of Pachita’s psychic surgery, sat at the far end of the same continuum.

This is a beautiful theory. It is also, as stated, almost entirely unfalsifiable.

The temptation, when you encounter writing like this, is to either swallow it whole or dismiss it whole. Both responses are lazy. The work has a testable core and a metaphysical shell, and the two need to be separated before anything useful can be said about either.

The testable core is the transferred potential experiment. Two people interact for twenty minutes. They are placed in electromagnetically shielded rooms separated by a distance that rules out ordinary signaling. Only one subject of each pair is stimulated by one hundred light flashes. An EEG records evoked potentials in the stimulated subject. A second EEG records the unstimulated subject. Grinberg and his coauthors, including the theoretical physicist Amit Goswami, claimed that when the stimulated subject showed distinct evoked potentials, the nonstimulated subject showed “transferred potentials” similar to those evoked in the stimulated subject. They titled the 1994 paper “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain,” and they proposed that the brain has a macroscopic quantum component capable of nonlocal correlation across distance.

If the effect were real and robust, it would rank among the most important findings in the history of neuroscience. So what does the replication record show?

Leanna Standish and colleagues at Bastyr University and the University of Washington repeated the design in 2003 and 2004, recording simultaneous EEGs from pairs of subjects placed in sound-attenuated rooms separated by ten meters, later extending the work to fMRI. They reported small correlations in some pairs, statistically above chance, broadly consistent with Grinberg’s direction. A 2018 re-analysis by groups at IULM in Milan and the University of Padova, applying machine-learning classifiers to two pooled datasets covering forty-five pairs, found classification accuracies of 50.74 percent on the first dataset and 51.17 percent, 50.45 percent, and 51.91 percent across stimulation conditions on the second. The honest reading of those numbers is that there is, at best, a faint signal above noise, on the order of one to two percent above chance, and that the signal does not hold up under stricter analytical methods. The “one in four pairs” claim from the original paper is the kind of effect size that thins out when sample sizes grow and protocols tighten. The result might be noise. It might be small and real. The data, after thirty years, cannot tell us which.

The Lattice does not announce itself in clean experimental data. What announces itself is a smear of weakly positive results, sensitive to method, sample, and the personal coherence of the experimenters and subjects. A smear of that kind, in any other branch of biology, would be treated as a candidate artifact rather than a candidate discovery.

So where are the weak spots in Grinberg’s argument? I count five.

The first concerns decoherence. Quantum entanglement is fragile. It survives at extremely low temperatures, in highly isolated systems, in laboratories where engineers work for years to prevent contact with the surrounding environment. The human brain operates at 310 Kelvin, immersed in saltwater, packed with thermal vibration and electrochemical traffic. The mainstream physical objection to any macroscopic quantum brain is that entangled states cannot last long enough at body temperature to do anything cognitively useful. Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have proposed microtubules inside neurons as a possible shelter for such states, and that proposal has critics of its own. Grinberg borrowed the language of EPR correlation without supplying a physical mechanism that addresses decoherence at all.

Venue makes a second weakness. Physics Essays publishes heterodox work. It is peer-reviewed, but it is not Physical Review Letters. Goswami, the coauthor who supplied the quantum framework, is a theoretical physicist whose later career was spent largely outside academic physics, writing for general audiences on consciousness. David Bohm, whose Wholeness and the Implicate Order Grinberg cited as foundational, was taken seriously by working physicists in a way that Goswami’s idealist consciousness work has not been. None of this disqualifies Grinberg’s results. It does qualify the weight one should give them before independent replication settles the question.

Pachita is a third problem. Grinberg believed he was watching a high-coherence shaman manipulate the Lattice when he observed the curandera apparently materializing tissue and performing organ transplants without anesthesia. The skeptical literature on psychic surgery is well developed, going back to James Randi’s documentation of Filipino practitioners in the 1970s and 1980s. The techniques are reproducible by stage magicians using animal tissue concealed in the hand. I do not claim that Pachita was fraudulent. I claim that Grinberg’s failure to engage with that literature on his own observations was a methodological gap large enough to fall through.

A fourth weakness sits in the unfalsifiability of the Lattice itself. The transferred potential is testable. The claim that space is a holographic informational matrix decoded by the brain is, as currently stated, not testable in any sharp way. The interpretation can absorb any outcome by adjusting what counts as coherence. A theory closed to refutation has crossed out of science and into philosophy, where Bohm’s implicate order belongs and where Grinberg’s Syntergic Theory should be argued.

The fifth weakness is the disappearance, which has worked as an evidentiary force-multiplier in the opposite direction the mystics imagine. Because the man vanished, the work is treated as forbidden knowledge. Because the work is treated as forbidden, it is shielded from the ordinary correction processes of science. The romance of the vanishing has done more damage to the theory than any single critic ever could.

That is the harsh audit. Here is what survives it.

What survives is a serious twentieth-century researcher who took indigenous practitioners seriously when most of his peers would not, who designed and ran controlled experiments on a phenomenon his discipline refused to study, who published in peer-reviewed venues with a theoretical physicist as coauthor, and whose specific empirical claim of brain-to-brain correlation across electromagnetic shielding has been independently tested by university laboratories in the United States and Europe with weakly positive but unconvincing results. The Lattice as cosmology fails the audit, while the transferred potential as a research program clears it.

Which brings me to the question worth taking seriously. What would real entry into the Lattice look like, if Grinberg’s empirical claim deserves another hearing?

Entry would begin by separating Syntergic cosmology from transferred-potential empiricism, permanently. The cosmology is interesting as a philosophical proposition and belongs in the philosophy of mind, alongside Bohm, Whitehead, and the slow-burning literature on panpsychism. The empiricism is interesting as a falsifiable claim and demands the methodological rigor the original work lacked. That means preregistered protocols, pair samples in the hundreds rather than the dozens, blinded analysis, machine-learning classifiers reported with confidence intervals, datasets shared openly, and a pre-committed null hypothesis the field will accept if the signal fails to clear it. The work has been creeping in that direction for twenty years, slowly, in the parapsychology literature and in a small set of medical schools. It needs to migrate into mainstream cognitive neuroscience or it will live on the margins forever.

Mechanism comes next. Holographic metaphors are not mechanisms. A specific physical proposal must explain how two brains separated by fifteen meters of air and steel could correlate at all. Decoherence is the wall. Until someone proposes a mechanism that survives a hostile physics seminar, the empirical results, even if they hold up, will be read as artifact rather than discovery. Penrose and Hameroff at least attempted a mechanism. Grinberg never did, and the field has not done it for him in the thirty years since.

Last, we would have to give up the romance of the vanishing. Grinberg probably did not step into his own theory. The most likely reading of the available evidence is that he died in late 1994, in circumstances Mexican authorities never resolved, with attention focused on his immediate domestic situation. The investigation failed. The case remains open. As long as his disappearance functions as evidence for his theory, we are doing magical thinking under the cover of physics. A theory has to survive on its experimental record, not on the mystery of its author’s death.

Is any of this real, or possible? The transferred potential, in its weak form, might be real. The Lattice, as Grinberg drew it, is most likely not real in the literal physical sense he intended. What is real is the underlying scandal that consciousness studies were starved of funding and respectability for most of the twentieth century, that a serious researcher who tried to bring rigor to the question was treated as fringe in his own lifetime, that he disappeared before he could finish his work, and that the field has only now begun to catch up to the questions he was asking.

If we want to enter the Lattice, the entry point is methodological, not mystical. We pick up where he left off. The testable parts get tested. Cosmology stands as a working metaphor that may, or may not, be redeemed by data. Above all, we resist the temptation to make the man’s death do the work that his experiments could not finish.

That is the only honest way to read him now.

"We explore the fascinating and unsettling history of peculiar experiments conducted on children in the GATE program.. This investigation delves into the origins of programs like the Stargate Project and the Monroe Institute.. raising questions about extrasensory perception and the mysterious capabilities of the human mind."

CIA Psychic Experiments on Children: The GATE Program Exposed
https://youtu.be/3Ty1_ksLfyE

#CIA #Parapsychology #GATE #StrangerThings #MKUltra #ESP #RemoteViewing

"We explore the fascinating and unsettling history of peculiar experiments conducted on children in the GATE program.. This investigation delves into the origins of programs like the Stargate Project and the Monroe Institute.. raising questions about extrasensory perception and the mysterious capabilities of the human mind."

CIA Psychic Experiments on Children: The GATE Program Exposed
https://youtu.be/3Ty1_ksLfyE

#CIA #Parapsychology #GATE #StrangerThings #MKUltra #ESP #RemoteViewing

Consciousness isn’t confined to your skull. 🧠✨

Starting within an hour at 8pm CET (7pm UTC) to explore non-local consciousness—evidence that your awareness extends beyond your body.

🔴 LIVE session: https://www.icloud.com/invites/0c1FYfTjcdx6zh4HCTz10wKJA

#NonLocalConsciousness #MeditationScience #ConsciousnessStudies #HeartCoherence #QuantumField #RemoteViewing #LucidDreaming #SelfRegulation #MindfulnessResearch #MeditationPractice #ExpandedAwareness #TransformationalMeditation #LiveMeditation #ConsciousLiving

Consciousness isn’t confined to your skull. 🧠✨

Join me LIVE on November 27 at 8pm CET (7pm UTC) to explore non-local consciousness—evidence that your awareness extends beyond your body.

🔴 LIVE session: https://www.icloud.com/invites/0c1FYfTjcdx6zh4HCTz10wKJA

#NonLocalConsciousness #MeditationScience #ConsciousnessStudies #HeartCoherence #QuantumField #RemoteViewing #LucidDreaming #SelfRegulation #MindfulnessResearch #MeditationPractice #ExpandedAwareness #TransformationalMeditation #LiveMeditation #ConsciousLiving

Are you interested in lucid dreaming and remote viewing? Try setting intentions before sleep, keeping a dream journal, and performing regular reality checks during the day. Use relaxation techniques like meditation & progressive muscle relaxation to help induce a state of relaxation.

@meditation
@consciousliving

#LucidDreaming #RemoteViewing #Meditation #RelaxationTechniques

Live Stream from the Namib Desert

https://bookofjoe2.blogspot.com/2025/10/live-stream-from-namib-desert.html

#HackerNews #LiveStream #NamibDesert #NatureExploration #AdventureTech #RemoteViewing

Live Stream from the Namib Desert

https://bookofjoe2.blogspot.com/2025/10/live-stream-from-namib-desert.html

#HackerNews #LiveStream #NamibDesert #NatureExploration #AdventureTech #RemoteViewing

2/2…there is a lot more work to be done. Analytics for #Precognition are not #RemoteViewing. Your front loaded in all the worst ways.
Your also going to recognize the conundrums of success in these areas. It’s all very attractive to the wrong kinds of people for all the wrong reasons. Publishing would be like pissing in your own pool and starting an arms race. Precognition is real and bootstrappable. But it’s a horse that doesn’t like the harness. A real beatch

https://mastodon.social/@mooseallain.b[email protected]/114669793208216943
#RemoteViewing #telepathy #psychic #paranormal #woowoo

@trndgtr
Swann was probably seeing the future.
#IngoSwann #RemoteViewing #Stargate #StargateProgram #GrillFlame #woowoo

🕵️‍♂️ CIA files reveal shocking twist in search for Ark of the Covenant! 🏺✨ Psychic claims to have "seen" the biblical artifact buried in Middle East. 🧠👁️ Skeptics raise eyebrows, but the truth is out there! 🌍🔍 #ArkOfTheCovenant #CIAFiles #RemoteViewing

Read more: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2536720/declassified-cia-files-suggest-ark-of-the-covenant-may-have-been-located #boulevardbs

🕵️‍♂️ CIA files reveal shocking twist in search for Ark of the Covenant! 🏺✨ Psychic claims to have "seen" the biblical artifact buried in Middle East. 🧠👁️ Skeptics raise eyebrows, but the truth is out there! 🌍🔍 #ArkOfTheCovenant #CIAFiles #RemoteViewing

Read more: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2536720/declassified-cia-files-suggest-ark-of-the-covenant-may-have-been-located #boulevardbs

The ONLY other permitted use of the #Stargate hashtag is as a synonym for one of these: #GrillFlame #GondolaWish #CenterLane #ProjectCF #SunStreak #Scanate .
But, of course, nobody talks about any of those any more. :thaenkin:

#FortMeade #SRI #RemoteViewing
#precognition #psychotronic
#RussellTarg #HaroldPuthoff
#IngoSwann #PatPrice
#Stubblebine
#DavidMorehouse
#JosephMcMoneagle #EdDames

One thing I was particularly psyched about yesterday when I went to AVAM (American Visionary Art Museum) was seeing the paintings of Ingo Swann, a fascinating figure whom I've only somewhat recently become aware of. Here are some photos I took of his paintings, including the literally otherworldly Millennium Triptych, which is close to 30 feet in total length and about 10 feet high
1/3

#IngoSwann #remoteviewing

Notes on the #TelepathyTapes : Researchers are aware that telepathy is part of a putative #SixSigma constellation of #Psi fx including
#Precognition, #Clairvoyance, #Clairaudience and #RemoteViewing and in that we have meta-analyses inclusive of these that will exceed required thresholds. There isn’t a problem accepting the tapes observations as supportive of telepathy- the issue is that prior studies supporting telepathy have better controls and design !
…so this group needs to tighten their…

#567 Bob Rickard and Paul Sieveking (eds) - Fortean Times: The Journal of Strange Phenomena, No 126. John Brown Publishing Ltd, London, September 1999. #ForteanTimes #BobRickard #PaulSieveking #RemoteViewing #BookOfTheDay

#567 Bob Rickard and Paul Sieveking (eds) - Fortean Times: The Journal of Strange Phenomena, No 126. John Brown Publishing Ltd, London, September 1999. #ForteanTimes #BobRickard #PaulSieveking #RemoteViewing #BookOfTheDay

Regarding the phenomenology of purely psychic or magical influences, when you think about someone, your mind shapes itself into a representation of that person, and in order to maximize rapport, sympathy, resonance, or decrease the distance between you and that person, there has to be an accurate representation. Your mind becomes more and more like that of the person you are trying to influence as you approach that person on a psychic plane.

We can locate things in space and time by going to the space where it is at and the time where it is at and interacting with it. How do you find a non-physical, psychic entity, such as a concept? We locate these entities through symbols. Symbols point to concepts. In this case, your mind makes itself that symbol. The connection between the symbol and the concept is reinforced through redundancy. The more similar your mind is to that other person, the stronger the connection between your intent and that person. I can typically intuit whether a person is psychic or magical by the degree and clarity I can sense them. The clearer they are to me, the more similar we are.

So, when you seek to influence a person, you open yourself up to that same influence. Magic is not a one-way thing because it is predicated on your intention, and your intention is connected to you, and is your mind using itself as a symbol and mediator. Your mind is the gateway and the mediator for magic. Everything has an inverse or a negation. If you are seeking to influence someone else per your will, then the inverse is them influencing you via their will. In the same way that every integer has an additive inverse, there is an inverse with this and by creating that object, you create a possible inverse.

Psychokinesis and the Manipulation of Probability

I was born with psychokinetic abilities more archetypal of science fiction than occultism. Many people do not understand how psychokinesis works. Probability, in the sense of luck, doesn’t actually exist. In statistical mechanics, probability corresponds to the frequency of occurrence of an event, often represented as a histogram. This probabilistic frequency is related to processes like absorption and emission of heat. Temperature, in the context of statistical mechanics, is associated with scalar quantities such as speed (the magnitude of velocity) and momentum (the product of mass and velocity). These are the statistical properties that a spell or psychokinesis influences, rather than luck. They are influencing kinetic properties with their intention, i.e., psychokinesis.

Chthonic Infernal Powers

Heat is disordered mechanical and rotational energy, so by manipulating disorder, entropy, and randomness, one is manipulating heat. As someone who exemplifies Chthonic, demonic, and draconic entities, I like to think of my psychokinesis and sorcerous abilities as a lower-dimensional manifestation of infernal powers. Influencing probabilities is a lower-dimensional manifestation of the iconic fire breath of a dragon or the fire powers of demons. It’s a lower-dimensional physical projection of the astral dragon’s fire breath. Astrologically, I am an Earth Dragon. This type of serpentine dragon is known as a Long, which is a wyrm similar to a Leviathan. Of course, this is a mythological narrative; however, it is a convenient abstraction and metaphor that encapsulates the connection among sorcery, psychokinesis, order, and statistical mechanical properties. As someone that is satanic, it also fits my spiritual beliefs, too. I am not an adept; instead, I am the serpent in the garden of Eden.

The Blurring of Boundaries

When you manipulate a probability, you are effectively determining the outcome or direction of things. On a smaller scale, you are influencing the oscillation of matter to perturb it. When a spell changes the odds of something happening, it is effectively organizing disorder, mechanical, and rotational energy – that is, heat – in a way that serves the practitioner’s desired outcome by creating a coordination of energy and matter. This might appear rather mechanical, but it isn’t. There is a psychic component to it.

When I influence the movement of a candle flame or light a candle, I become that candle flame. My psychokinesis is an abstraction of clairvoyance and psychokinesis, which is why I have a hard time simply sensing the future with a precognitive application of clairvoyance. I explain that here: Influencing the Future, One Wave at a Time.

Through verification and feedback, I can tell there is a veridical connection between that gestalt and fire. So, my mind is accurately shaping itself into the representation of fire, so in a sense, there is an aspect of me that is fire. Whenever I want to influence a candle flame or light a candle, I evoke that gestalt. There is a connection between me and the candle such that there is a blurring between me and the candle. I become the candle and that part of me becomes the candle flame. When you influence something with magic or psychic abilities, that illusion of separation disappears.

Gestalts and Ideograms in Remote Viewing

My consciousness will sense a candle flame in the other room clairvoyantly and will encode that noetic knowledge as a gestalt, an ideogram, into my internal schema. I can recognize that I am psychically sensing fire because of how it’s stored in the schema of my consciousness. I employ a similar system of gestalts that you might find in Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV), although I’ve developed my own model and templates. The sigils and magical languages I create and use denote those gestalts and act as ideograms. Gestalts are used differently in Parapsychological paradigms than in general Psychology.

“The word “gestalt” is not a remote viewing term, even though that is the place you will hear it most. It is, in fact, a psychological term which means the basic conceptual quality or basic aspect of any one thing. For example, “dew”, “lake”, “ocean”, “sweat”, “rain”, “ice”, etc., all have the gestalt of “water”. If you were to add “gasoline”, “bleach”, and “oil” to that list, the basic gestalt would be “liquid”.

Remote viewing starts off with the viewer getting the basic gestalts of the site, and then taking each gestalt individually and describing its individual qualities. So, a session might begin with the viewing finding that the target has the basic gestalts of “land”, “water”, and “manmade”. The second step or stage in the remote viewing process is to first give an actual description of the “land” at the site, then the “water” aspect of it, and then describe the “manmade” aspect of the target. In this way, a picture of the target builds up in a pollution-free environment.

One way of understanding the word, “gestalt” is to say that it is the “—iness” of the target. That is, “the target has water-iness, land-iness, and manmade-iness to it.”
—Lyn Buchanan

“Definitions:

Major Gestalt: The overall impression presented by all elements of the site taken for their composite interactive meaning. The one concept that more than all others would be the best description of the site.

Ideogram: The “I” component of the I/A/B sequence. The ideogram is the spontaneous graphic representation of the major gestalt, manifested by the motion of the viewer’s pen on paper, which motion is produced by the impingement of the signal line on the autonomic nervous system and the reflexive transmission of the resultant nervous energy to the muscles of the viewer’s hand and arm. The objectified ideogram has no “scale;” that is, the size of the ideogram relative to the paper seems to have no relevance to the actual size of any component at the site.

“A” Component: The “feeling/motion” component of the ideogram. The “feeling/motion” is essentially the impression of the physical consistency (hard, soft, solid, fluid, gaseous, etc.) and contour/shape/motion of the site. For example, the monitor has selected, unknown to the viewer, a mountain as the trainee’s site. At the iteration of the coordinate, the trainee produces an appropriate ideogram, and responds verbally, at the same time as he writes it: “Rising up, peak, down.” This is the “motion” sensation he experienced as his pen produced the ideogram. He then says “solid,” having experienced the site as being solid as opposed to fluid or airy. This is the “feeling” component of the Stage 1 process. There are at least five possible types of feelings: solidity, liquidity, energetic, airiness (that is, where there is more air space than anything else, such as some suspension bridges might manifest), and temperature. Other feeling descriptors are possible, but encountered only in rare circumstances and connected with unusual sites. These components and how they are expressed in structure will be discussed more fully below. Though in discussions of theory this aspect is usually address as “feeling/motion,” it will normally be the case in actual session work that the motion aspect is decoded first with the feeling portion coming second.”

—CRV Stage 1–Coordinate (“Controlled”) Remote Viewing Manual

I do know of a few chaos magicians – one in particular – who have taken Remote Viewing courses. They use gestalts and ideograms as the foundation for sigils, which they then enhance using editing programs like Gimp. The more experienced members of chaos magical orders will incorporate geographic coordinates and RV gestalts into the image layers of Gimp for sigils intended for group workings directed at a particular place or institution. I have witnessed one of these bizarre workings on Discord.

Whatever you seek to create, you have to become to actualize that thing, so if you seek to create a negative, horrific future, you become horrific. You are what you cast.

#anarchism #anarchists #anarchy #Animism #animistic #archetypes #astrology #chaosMagic #chaosMagick #Chthonic #conspiracyTheories #conspiracyTheory #CRV #demon #demons #DKMU #dragons #ESP #gestalt #gestalts #magick #occult #occultism #Parapsychology #psychic #Psychokinesis #RemoteViewing #RV #semiotic #semiotics #sigil #sigilMagick #sigils #sorcery #Stargate #UAP #UAPs #UFO #UFOs #witch #witchcraft

I'm sooo sorry, I mean we're at six sigma for #Precognition and #RemoteViewing (thank you FOIA btw) fer Pete's sake but honestly wrt UAP/UFO bits and channeling...there are trustworthy folks in one of those spaces now at least but most of you still got that wild eyed look. Maybe ease up on the shrooms for awhile.Also showering would be good...
🤣☕🐾🤘

Scrolling through the magick hashtag on here, I see a lot of people asking others to charge a sigil. Firstly, my issue is: what does that even mean? In an abstract sense, a charge is when you pass on a finitely signed measure, in both directions. For example, if I have two apples and someone hands me two more, I can count and see I have four apples. Apples are concrete things that I can see. What is the thing that we are passing, where is it going, and how are we measuring that this thing has changed such that it is charged? Here is the thing: Charge is a measurable property. Charge is useless without context, like the word energy. Energy is just a property of something that can cause a change. The term is useless without a reference frame.

Yes, I understand how magic works. The intuitive idea is that they are charging it with intent via their attention. But, let’s consider an experiment. Suppose I have a liquid, and I want people to charge this liquid with intention. The easiest things to measure would be the activity level of the liquid. Because quantum objects, like electrons, are sensitive to psychic or magical forces, something like ions in a liquid would highly sensitive to magic; therefore, we can measure activity to see if there is a correlation. There is an extinction of psychic skill if the feedback is unclear. If you are directing your intention and attention at something for a psychic or magical effect, and there is no feedback or the feedback is unclear, such that you attribute confirmation bias or any other bias to something psychic or magical, you start to harm your ability. Posting sigils on social media and asking people to use them for a group working is a great way to create a culture and spread memetic influence; however, without a way of measuring whether a ‘charge’ is really happening, you just harm everyone’s ability.”

Currently, Dean Radin is running an experiment with the double-slit experiment, sigils, a Buddha figure, and equipment he is sending out to magicians relative to things like Remote Viewing. The equipment is highly sensitive and filled with sensors, so, again, he can measure things. The person that sparked this conversation is involved with the Illuminati of Thanateros, so they should know better. It drives me just as insane with tarot card readers that do no null hypothesis significance testing at all. If your hypothesis within your theory is that the cards are encoding a message, then that would mean the cards are not random, and joint probabilities and correlations exist, allowing us to perform statistical hypothesis testing. I think people have gotten so into the habit of conning people that they con themselves.

#anarchism #anarchists #anarchy #Animism #animistic #ceremonialMagick #chaosMagic #chaosMagick #cults #divination #magick #memes #occult #occultism #occulture #pagan #paganism #paranormal #Parapsychology #psychic #RemoteViewing #RV #servitor #servitors #sigil #sigilMagick #sigils #tarotCards #witch #witchcraft

Skeptoid #44: The Truth About Remote Viewing by Brian Dunning #jamesrandi #josephmcmoneagle #remoteviewing #projectstargate #SkeptoidPodcast #podcast #bot The psychic technique of remote viewing is consistent with simple, well known magic tricks.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4044

#TangerineDream - '#RemoteViewing' (1981) from the #Album #Exit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0uohL0dV6Y&list=OLAK5uy_n5iNx2K3w6FppjVtryJQqXm_tUf19gdeg&ab_channel=TangerineDream-Topic

#Music #Song #Pop #PopMusic #Rock #RockMusic #Synth #Synths #Synthesizer #Synthesizers #SynthMusic #SynthesizerMusic

#TangerineDream - '#RemoteViewing' (1981) from the #Album #Exit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0uohL0dV6Y&list=OLAK5uy_n5iNx2K3w6FppjVtryJQqXm_tUf19gdeg&ab_channel=TangerineDream-Topic

#Music #Song #Pop #PopMusic #Rock #RockMusic #Synth #Synths #Synthesizer #Synthesizers #SynthMusic #SynthesizerMusic

A couple years ago I made a #weird TikTok about hiding a secret object and inviting people to try to "find it" -- in a #dream.

Hundreds tried! #Today I wanna see if anyone here on #Mastodon wants to try?

The plan: So there is this abandoned and gated off park here in Bremerton (where my neighbors saw a raccoon go down the slide!!!). I've hidden an object there in the play structure. Find it your dream!

#luciddream #remoteviewing #dreampark #occult #weird #witch #strange #wtf #paranormal

@clayrivers Abandonment was more recurring theme than plot twist. My dysfunction started early, but I came by it honestly. Dad was an angry arrogant rage-aholic, excused as a “flash temper” or “Irish temper,” a genetic predisposition that was not his to control but ours to endure. I began #RemoteViewing maybe age 7 or 8, to predict his arrival and mood. To see if I should hide. To see if I was “getting the belt” again for no GD reason at all. I #Dissociated by day, #OutOfBodyExperience at night