#precognition — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #precognition, aggregated by home.social.
-
3/n... #Entanglement then there could be some operator that survives the ambient thermal bath, gives up some n bits of information, then collapses. In this context the experiment is indistinguishable from many other experiments in #QuantumMechanics and #QuantumInformation. If we were talking about #Precognition no one needs to know
-
3/n... #Entanglement then there could be some operator that survives the ambient thermal bath, gives up some n bits of information, then collapses. In this context the experiment is indistinguishable from many other experiments in #QuantumMechanics and #QuantumInformation. If we were talking about #Precognition no one needs to know
-
1/n #Quantum States as #Classical Sensors Dept: For work in #Precognition and #Augmented #Psi there are two generalizations useful for different purposes - The applications fork can be independent of theoretical constraints. In other words you can generate data for quantitative / qualitative corollation without asking what the mechanism is...
In the Foundational fork your looking for the theory - your trying to determine mechanism or some variable dependent on mechanism - encodings, signal... -
I see that you will like and subscribe https://youtu.be/bS4za0xUz2I
-
1/2 #Engineering, #Comedy, #NoeticSpectrum Dept : Yesterday found myself outlining current work in #Precognition to a non #Science person using the example of a self driving car to introduce the concept of #boundedness ; there are not infinitely many ways to get where your going etc...
This in spite of the fact that I would never own a self driving car, let alone let one drive me anywhere, so irony and hypocrisy for 500 please...
The tangent aside to this is that #Precognition, #Telepathy... -
1/2 #Engineering, #Comedy, #NoeticSpectrum Dept : Yesterday found myself outlining current work in #Precognition to a non #Science person using the example of a self driving car to introduce the concept of #boundedness ; there are not infinitely many ways to get where your going etc...
This in spite of the fact that I would never own a self driving car, let alone let one drive me anywhere, so irony and hypocrisy for 500 please...
The tangent aside to this is that #Precognition, #Telepathy... -
1/2 #Engineering, #Comedy, #NoeticSpectrum Dept : Yesterday found myself outlining current work in #Precognition to a non #Science person using the example of a self driving car to introduce the concept of #boundedness ; there are not infinitely many ways to get where your going etc...
This in spite of the fact that I would never own a self driving car, let alone let one drive me anywhere, so irony and hypocrisy for 500 please...
The tangent aside to this is that #Precognition, #Telepathy... -
1/2 #Engineering, #Comedy, #NoeticSpectrum Dept : Yesterday found myself outlining current work in #Precognition to a non #Science person using the example of a self driving car to introduce the concept of #boundedness ; there are not infinitely many ways to get where your going etc...
This in spite of the fact that I would never own a self driving car, let alone let one drive me anywhere, so irony and hypocrisy for 500 please...
The tangent aside to this is that #Precognition, #Telepathy... -
1/2 #Engineering, #Comedy, #NoeticSpectrum Dept : Yesterday found myself outlining current work in #Precognition to a non #Science person using the example of a self driving car to introduce the concept of #boundedness ; there are not infinitely many ways to get where your going etc...
This in spite of the fact that I would never own a self driving car, let alone let one drive me anywhere, so irony and hypocrisy for 500 please...
The tangent aside to this is that #Precognition, #Telepathy... -
two lectures by william burroughs
https://youtu.be/d-2a0Rti6-Y?si=KioGJXflz24OVOLE
Audio recording of a lecture & writing class with students at Naropa University. Poet Allen Ginsberg is also in the audience. Burroughs covers topics including paranormal phenomena, magic, synchronicity, precognition, dreams, his cut-ups technique for writing, & he answers many questions from students & from Ginsberg in a Q & A. He reads from some of his fiction & non-fiction writings. The woman who asks many questions near the end & thanks him at the end I believe is Anne Waldman of Naropa University.
https://youtu.be/xKfS1xemH6U?si=tiykZp1l2fnq2Bli
This audio recording complements the previous one.
In this recording Burroughs covers the cut-up method of writing in some detail, & reads from his own cut-up writings, as well as some by Burroughs’ sometime collaborator Brion Gysin. Burroughs describes how some cut-ups appear to be uncanny prognosticators, accurately predicting future events, according to Burroughs.
He also describes experiments with audio cut-ups using tape recorders. He had intended to play recordings of some of Gysin’s tape experiments at this lecture, but the tapes had not arrived on time. Instead, Burroughs describes some of the cut-up tape experiments.
And he covers other tape experiments that interest him conducted by paranormal investigators & what today is commonly known as EVP (electronic voice phenomena), where tape recorders are supposed to record unexplained mysterious human voices though no such sound input is available to the recorder. Burroughs refers to these as “Paranormal Voices” experiments/phenomena.
Burroughs also makes reference to dreams, the last words of Dutch Schultz, Shakespeare, computers, Homer, Gertrude Stein, James Joyce, T.S. Eliot, & Carl Jung.
There’s a long Q & A session with students at the end.#AllenGinsberg #AnneWaldman #audio #audioRecording #BrionGysin #BurroughsLectures #CarlGustavJung #computers #cutUp #cutUp #cutUpTechnique #cutUpsTechnique #cutup #dreams #DutchSchultz #electronicVoicePhenomena #EVP #GertrudeStein #Homer #JamesJoyce #Jung #lecture #lectures #magic #NaropaUninversity #Omero #paranormalPhenomena #precognition #QA #QuestionAnswer #Shakespeare #synchronicity #TSEliot #tapeExperiments #WilliamBurroughs #writingClass
-
2/2…there is a lot more work to be done. Analytics for #Precognition are not #RemoteViewing. Your front loaded in all the worst ways.
Your also going to recognize the conundrums of success in these areas. It’s all very attractive to the wrong kinds of people for all the wrong reasons. Publishing would be like pissing in your own pool and starting an arms race. Precognition is real and bootstrappable. But it’s a horse that doesn’t like the harness. A real beatch -
2/2…there is a lot more work to be done. Analytics for #Precognition are not #RemoteViewing. Your front loaded in all the worst ways.
Your also going to recognize the conundrums of success in these areas. It’s all very attractive to the wrong kinds of people for all the wrong reasons. Publishing would be like pissing in your own pool and starting an arms race. Precognition is real and bootstrappable. But it’s a horse that doesn’t like the harness. A real beatch -
2/2…there is a lot more work to be done. Analytics for #Precognition are not #RemoteViewing. Your front loaded in all the worst ways.
Your also going to recognize the conundrums of success in these areas. It’s all very attractive to the wrong kinds of people for all the wrong reasons. Publishing would be like pissing in your own pool and starting an arms race. Precognition is real and bootstrappable. But it’s a horse that doesn’t like the harness. A real beatch -
Got my tickets and signed up for two games at #Precognition (a virtual con next weekend) this morning. I'll be playing in a Fallout game on Friday and a Nuked game on Sunday. On Saturday, I'll be running a session of The W.A.T.C.H. and then Outbreak using the Elemental system from Gildor Games.
-
1/2 Thursday #NoeticSpectrum : We know the general public is fascinated with #NDE’s , #Precognition and other categories involving extraordinary cognition and experience. Likewise with #UAP and evidence suggesting we are not alone. Their numbers dwarf those of us whose fascination involves a combination of experience and the desire to bootstrap knowledge in #Physics, #Engineering , #Bioscience and other areas. It’s really interesting to have a group that can approach grand challenges and feed-
-
A quotation from Thomas Carlyle
Our grand business undoubtedly is, not to see what lies dimly at a distance, but to do what lies clearly at hand.
Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) Scottish essayist and historian
Essay (1829-06), “Signs of the Times,” Edinburgh Review, Vol. 49, No. 98, Art. 7Sourcing, notes: wist.info/carlyle-thomas/731/
#quote #quotes #quotation #action #anticipation #assignment #business #carpediem #duty #forecast #future #hereandnow #now #opportunity #precognition #prediction #present #seizetheday #seizethemoment #today
-
The ONLY other permitted use of the #Stargate hashtag is as a synonym for one of these: #GrillFlame #GondolaWish #CenterLane #ProjectCF #SunStreak #Scanate .
But, of course, nobody talks about any of those any more. :thaenkin:#FortMeade #SRI #RemoteViewing
#precognition #psychotronic
#RussellTarg #HaroldPuthoff
#IngoSwann #PatPrice
#Stubblebine
#DavidMorehouse
#JosephMcMoneagle #EdDames -
The ONLY other permitted use of the #Stargate hashtag is as a synonym for one of these: #GrillFlame #GondolaWish #CenterLane #ProjectCF #SunStreak #Scanate .
But, of course, nobody talks about any of those any more. :thaenkin:#FortMeade #SRI #RemoteViewing
#precognition #psychotronic
#RussellTarg #HaroldPuthoff
#IngoSwann #PatPrice
#Stubblebine
#DavidMorehouse
#JosephMcMoneagle #EdDames -
The ONLY other permitted use of the #Stargate hashtag is as a synonym for one of these: #GrillFlame #GondolaWish #CenterLane #ProjectCF #SunStreak #Scanate .
But, of course, nobody talks about any of those any more. :thaenkin:#FortMeade #SRI #RemoteViewing
#precognition #psychotronic
#RussellTarg #HaroldPuthoff
#IngoSwann #PatPrice
#Stubblebine
#DavidMorehouse
#JosephMcMoneagle #EdDames -
The ONLY other permitted use of the #Stargate hashtag is as a synonym for one of these: #GrillFlame #GondolaWish #CenterLane #ProjectCF #SunStreak #Scanate .
But, of course, nobody talks about any of those any more. :thaenkin:#FortMeade #SRI #RemoteViewing
#precognition #psychotronic
#RussellTarg #HaroldPuthoff
#IngoSwann #PatPrice
#Stubblebine
#DavidMorehouse
#JosephMcMoneagle #EdDames -
Yes, yes, my previous post was about this blog being defunct; however, I don’t want to post or talk about this stuff from my main blog, so here we go.
I have issues with tarot cards. To be completely honest, my issues are exacerbated by people doubting my authenticity because I am not obsessed with occult symbols or talk endlessly about things like tarot cards, astrology, or grimoires. I wish I were kidding, but I’ve had little cabals, guilds, and cliques of people following me around the Internet for over 16 years at this point trying to prove I’m not legitimate. From what I can tell, it is because I refuse to join any occult cults or use systems that came from cult leaders. They find the idea of magic without an occult or religious system absolutely threatening or harmful to their self-esteem. I think it’s a weird manifestation of the sunk cost fallacy in that many of them have spent a lot of money, at the very least, if not large portions of their lives on these things. But, I digress.
One, tarot cards are overly complex and superfluous for no reason. Two, people who use them aren’t actually interested in whether the predictions are true. You can implement something like tarot cards without tarot cards. Personally, I like playing cards over tarot cards, and I’ve known some people to use Magic The Gathering Cards. In any case, we can treat denotations of magical paradigms as ontologies and ontological statements or expressions. As such, we can regard them as languages. A way to think about it is that I can store demons, angels, tarot cards, correspondences, etc. into a database, such as the MySQL database of this site. What does that imply? That implies that we can model magical entities as a mathematical set of tuples, i.e., an alphabet. The ability to store entities from a grimoire in a database.
Keep in mind that this site is powered by PHP and MySQL. If a person were to create a table in their database schema for demons, your ability to see that on the site would be an empirical case for the ability to do encode that information as tuples. The point is that we can treat the properties of these entities and the entity itself as an alphabet and words, respectively. That means that magical entities and correspondences are components of a tuple joined by operators to create relationships and rules. We can call that a language. As such, expressions and statements – such as the magical entity itself, can be expressed via a base 2 system, i.e., binary. An empirical case for this is the ability to store magical entities in a database, on a high level, which is digitally encoded as bytes sent across the Internet which you read through a CMS powered by SQL.
An example of a base 2 system is an ensemble of coins where each coin has two possible states. Conventionally, we can think of them as yes or no. Anything that you can store digitally is binary. Even an image. So, you are not necessarily restricted to yes or no questions, for you can abstract those. You can abstract different lengths and frequencies of yes and no into any pattern that you want. The point is that any person can create any prototypical pattern that they want, that’s a high-level abstraction of binary states. There’s no particular reason to use tarot cards or an occult divination system at all.
Here’s the other thing we know about how psychic and magical phenomena work: It’s based on subjective meaning. There’s a stronger connection if something has meaning to you, and it is subjective. There’s a larger dissonance between the prototypical patterns of a magical system and gestalt patterns and prototypical patterns of your behavior that emerge from your subjective experience. There’s a technique called a soul mirror in Hermetic schools of thought. Looking at your experience through a Hermetic magical system and language reflects back to you a version of yourself through the eyes of a Hermetic system; however, ChatGPT can actually be used as a type of mirror, too. One thing that I have been experimenting with is having ChatGPT analyze my journal entries and identify prototypical patterns that can be used in lieu of typical archetypes that show up in occultism. Again, you can treat the attributes of these patterns as tuples and reduce it down to a binary system that can be paired with coin divination practices.
It’s not just an aesthetic issue, it is an epistemological issue. When you are trying to scientifically prove something, you don’t actually prove it. What was drilled into my head is that science does not prove anything, because science is inductive and not deductive; therefore, nothing can be 100% in science. Instead, science supports hypotheses and theories. In addition to that, you aim to debunk your own hypothesis. This means, if the hypothesis is that the cards have a message in them, we should be able to disprove this. Since this is purely a statistical problem, this makes it falsifiable where a lay person can easily do Null Hypothesis Significance testing.
Randomness isn’t chaos. Randomness is when there is an equal probability of something happening. If there is a pool of events and all the events have the same probability of happening, that is an example of randomness. Information is an inverse property to randomness, where there is some type of sequence and correlation among pairs, i.e., a joint probability. Information is an ordered sequence of the joint probability of two things joined by an operator that denotes a correlation. So, that means if we are testing for the presence of information and a message in a spread of cards, we are looking for correlations, patterns, and redundancy above chance.
Say that a tarot card reader is able to reject the null hypothesis and show that there is a message in the cards. Does this mean that it was the tarot cards after all? No. What is actually happening? When someone with precognition senses the future, what is happening is that the information is being written to their brain and body. Biological systems are very noisy, and they are stochastic and chaotic. There is a lot of randomness. Similar to how random events are altered outside a person’s body through magic, precognition orders random events inside a person’s body.
The synaptic transmission of neurons—whether a neuron fires or not—is inherently stochastic. For example, the exact timing and number of vesicles released in response to each action potential can vary due to stochastic factors. These factors may include random fluctuations in the concentration of calcium ions or variations in the availability of vesicles for release. In addition, the probability of a neurotransmitter molecule binding to a receptor depends on factors such as the concentration of neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft, the affinity of the neurotransmitter for its receptor, and the presence of other molecules that may compete for receptor binding. By manipulating stochastic, noisy, and probabilistic factors such as these, precognitive information is written to the person’s brain through the activation of neural pathways.
Because of this, probability manipulation can be used to influence a person’s thoughts. By manipulating the probability of them making a particular decision, you can influence processes such as synaptic transmission and the firing of neural pathways. For obvious ethical reasons, I do not use this technique often and I do not teach it. In this political climate, who knows what people would do. I can compel people with that technique, but it requires one enter into a head space where you are okay with total domination of another person, and that persona is hard to shake off.
This means that when we can reject the null hypothesis in a tarot card reading regarding whether the cards convey a message or not, the power isn’t coming from the tarot cards or any magical system. Rather, a person is using precognition to sense the future. They are correlating that with entropic systems to encode information in an external source. Similar to how noise gets ordered in their brain, the entropic system becomes ordered to encode information. That implies there isn’t anything special about tarot cards. Instead, it is a combination of psychokinesis and precognition. Of course that implies a level of psychokinesis and precognition is necessary, though, a particular system is not.
For example, my husband is a diviner. He has precognitive abilities, empathic abilities, and small forms of psychokinesis, which manifest through his use of cards as a tool. The cards that frequently come up when we’ve been able to reject the null hypothesis for me are:
- King of Hearts
- Queen of Spades
- King of Diamonds
- Queen of Clubs
- King of Clubs
These cards frequently come up when my husband does a reading in a controlled experiment. We have an automatic card shuffler to eliminate any bias introduced from how we may shuffle the cards. My husband calls them the Five Monarchs, and he says that they represent five different personas that I have. He is correlating his empathic abilities with an ensemble that has entropy to encode information about my subconscious mind. These cards come up frequently beyond chance. Many occultists who have run into me are probably familiar with who is my Queen of Spades aspect that exemplifies the Evil Queen archetype.
While we are on the topic, formats like JPG and Computer Vision (CV) use Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to convert blocks of pixel data from the spatial domain (the original image) into the frequency domain (represented by coefficients). It does this by decomposing the image into a sum of cosine functions of different frequencies. The DCT represents the image data as a set of coefficients corresponding to different frequencies. Lower frequencies represent smooth variations in color and intensity, while higher frequencies represent rapid changes, such as edges or fine details. This means that any occult image that can be encoded as a JPEG is composed of sines and cosines, indicating that the image possesses harmonics. This means that any sigil or magical seal encoded in a JPG format is an image composed of sines and cosines that can be minimally represented with n modulo 2. If you encode the magical texts or magical seals into a digital image, it has a harmonic and binary representation.
I’ve been experimenting with the interplay of harmonics, entropy, and image formats to manipulate Johnson–Nyquist noise or randomness from beam splitters and laser pointers, with the aim of conjuring digital images and sigils directly through magic. My endeavors have involved extensive research and experimentation. However, regrettably, given the increasing radicalization within occult and paranormal communities, it’s too dangerous, irresponsible, and unethical to allow this knowledge to fall into their hands.
Entropy is not necessarily randomness, either, although they are often used interchangeably. Randomness and entropy become interchangeable when entropy is maximized. Entropy is a measurement of an ensemble and the permutations of that ensemble. A system that can be configured differently is thus an entropic system; however, that doesn’t necessarily imply randomness. Randomness implies one configuration being just as likely as another one. Having different permutations doesn’t imply all permutations are equally likely. Factorials can be used to calculate the number of possible arrangements or configurations of a system, which is closely related to its entropy. A maximally entropic system would be random; however, a random system is not necessary for there to a psychic influence, for there just needs to be enough degrees of freedom and entropy.
I think tarot cards denote a particular culture. It’s a signifier of cultural membership. It signals to everyone that you are into occultism and tarot card readers act as guides, so it denotes a particular level of spiritual authority. Tarot card readers would thus be equivalent to an evangelical that does intercessory prayer. Seeing a tarot card reader would be like a Christian seeking a pastor.
We don’t call Music Physics. We call Music Music, and we classify it as an art. To me, magic is the part of the underlying metaphysical aspects. The problem that I have is occultists’ belief that they have a dominance on magic such that people are starting to believe you cannot practice magic without occultism. Honestly, occultism is going down really, really dark paths, and I don’t believe you can spiritually progress while practicing occultism, so, for me, it is imperative to unlink magic and occultism.
A tarot card reader that claims they rely on intuition is a fake. If there were a message encoded in the cards, we could measure the frequencies of particular cards to see if they were random without the interpretation of the tarot card reader, regardless of whether we knew what the message meant. The patterns would be there.
It’s an aesthetic and a token of cultural membership.
#Animism #animistic #ceremonialMagic #ceremonialMagick #chaosMagic #chaosMagick #ChatGPT #cults #divination #DKMU #Hellenism #Hellenistic #hermeticism #husband #LGBTQ #magick #occult #occultism #occultist #occultists #occulture #pagan #paganism #paranormal #Parapsychology #precognition #psychic #Psychokinesis #rune #runes #sigil #sigilMagick #sigils #spiritual #Spirituality #tarot #tarotCards #Thelema #theosophy #Theurgy #witch #witchcraft
-
Yes, yes, my previous post was about this blog being defunct; however, I don’t want to post or talk about this stuff from my main blog, so here we go.
I have issues with tarot cards. To be completely honest, my issues are exacerbated by people doubting my authenticity because I am not obsessed with occult symbols or talk endlessly about things like tarot cards, astrology, or grimoires. I wish I were kidding, but I’ve had little cabals, guilds, and cliques of people following me around the Internet for over 16 years at this point trying to prove I’m not legitimate. From what I can tell, it is because I refuse to join any occult cults or use systems that came from cult leaders. They find the idea of magic without an occult or religious system absolutely threatening or harmful to their self-esteem. I think it’s a weird manifestation of the sunk cost fallacy in that many of them have spent a lot of money, at the very least, if not large portions of their lives on these things. But, I digress.
One, tarot cards are overly complex and superfluous for no reason. Two, people who use them aren’t actually interested in whether the predictions are true. You can implement something like tarot cards without tarot cards. Personally, I like playing cards over tarot cards, and I’ve known some people to use Magic The Gathering Cards. In any case, we can treat denotations of magical paradigms as ontologies and ontological statements or expressions. As such, we can regard them as languages. A way to think about it is that I can store demons, angels, tarot cards, correspondences, etc. into a database, such as the MySQL database of this site. What does that imply? That implies that we can model magical entities as a mathematical set of tuples, i.e., an alphabet. The ability to store entities from a grimoire in a database.
Keep in mind that this site is powered by PHP and MySQL. If a person were to create a table in their database schema for demons, your ability to see that on the site would be an empirical case for the ability to do encode that information as tuples. The point is that we can treat the properties of these entities and the entity itself as an alphabet and words, respectively. That means that magical entities and correspondences are components of a tuple joined by operators to create relationships and rules. We can call that a language. As such, expressions and statements – such as the magical entity itself, can be expressed via a base 2 system, i.e., binary. An empirical case for this is the ability to store magical entities in a database, on a high level, which is digitally encoded as bytes sent across the Internet which you read through a CMS powered by SQL.
An example of a base 2 system is an ensemble of coins where each coin has two possible states. Conventionally, we can think of them as yes or no. Anything that you can store digitally is binary. Even an image. So, you are not necessarily restricted to yes or no questions, for you can abstract those. You can abstract different lengths and frequencies of yes and no into any pattern that you want. The point is that any person can create any prototypical pattern that they want, that’s a high-level abstraction of binary states. There’s no particular reason to use tarot cards or an occult divination system at all.
Here’s the other thing we know about how psychic and magical phenomena work: It’s based on subjective meaning. There’s a stronger connection if something has meaning to you, and it is subjective. There’s a larger dissonance between the prototypical patterns of a magical system and gestalt patterns and prototypical patterns of your behavior that emerge from your subjective experience. There’s a technique called a soul mirror in Hermetic schools of thought. Looking at your experience through a Hermetic magical system and language reflects back to you a version of yourself through the eyes of a Hermetic system; however, ChatGPT can actually be used as a type of mirror, too. One thing that I have been experimenting with is having ChatGPT analyze my journal entries and identify prototypical patterns that can be used in lieu of typical archetypes that show up in occultism. Again, you can treat the attributes of these patterns as tuples and reduce it down to a binary system that can be paired with coin divination practices.
It’s not just an aesthetic issue, it is an epistemological issue. When you are trying to scientifically prove something, you don’t actually prove it. What was drilled into my head is that science does not prove anything, because science is inductive and not deductive; therefore, nothing can be 100% in science. Instead, science supports hypotheses and theories. In addition to that, you aim to debunk your own hypothesis. This means, if the hypothesis is that the cards have a message in them, we should be able to disprove this. Since this is purely a statistical problem, this makes it falsifiable where a lay person can easily do Null Hypothesis Significance testing.
Randomness isn’t chaos. Randomness is when there is an equal probability of something happening. If there is a pool of events and all the events have the same probability of happening, that is an example of randomness. Information is an inverse property to randomness, where there is some type of sequence and correlation among pairs, i.e., a joint probability. Information is an ordered sequence of the joint probability of two things joined by an operator that denotes a correlation. So, that means if we are testing for the presence of information and a message in a spread of cards, we are looking for correlations, patterns, and redundancy above chance.
Say that a tarot card reader is able to reject the null hypothesis and show that there is a message in the cards. Does this mean that it was the tarot cards after all? No. What is actually happening? When someone with precognition senses the future, what is happening is that the information is being written to their brain and body. Biological systems are very noisy, and they are stochastic and chaotic. There is a lot of randomness. Similar to how random events are altered outside a person’s body through magic, precognition orders random events inside a person’s body.
The synaptic transmission of neurons—whether a neuron fires or not—is inherently stochastic. For example, the exact timing and number of vesicles released in response to each action potential can vary due to stochastic factors. These factors may include random fluctuations in the concentration of calcium ions or variations in the availability of vesicles for release. In addition, the probability of a neurotransmitter molecule binding to a receptor depends on factors such as the concentration of neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft, the affinity of the neurotransmitter for its receptor, and the presence of other molecules that may compete for receptor binding. By manipulating stochastic, noisy, and probabilistic factors such as these, precognitive information is written to the person’s brain through the activation of neural pathways.
Because of this, probability manipulation can be used to influence a person’s thoughts. By manipulating the probability of them making a particular decision, you can influence processes such as synaptic transmission and the firing of neural pathways. For obvious ethical reasons, I do not use this technique often and I do not teach it. In this political climate, who knows what people would do. I can compel people with that technique, but it requires one enter into a head space where you are okay with total domination of another person, and that persona is hard to shake off.
This means that when we can reject the null hypothesis in a tarot card reading regarding whether the cards convey a message or not, the power isn’t coming from the tarot cards or any magical system. Rather, a person is using precognition to sense the future. They are correlating that with entropic systems to encode information in an external source. Similar to how noise gets ordered in their brain, the entropic system becomes ordered to encode information. That implies there isn’t anything special about tarot cards. Instead, it is a combination of psychokinesis and precognition. Of course that implies a level of psychokinesis and precognition is necessary, though, a particular system is not.
For example, my husband is a diviner. He has precognitive abilities, empathic abilities, and small forms of psychokinesis, which manifest through his use of cards as a tool. The cards that frequently come up when we’ve been able to reject the null hypothesis for me are:
- King of Hearts
- Queen of Spades
- King of Diamonds
- Queen of Clubs
- King of Clubs
These cards frequently come up when my husband does a reading in a controlled experiment. We have an automatic card shuffler to eliminate any bias introduced from how we may shuffle the cards. My husband calls them the Five Monarchs, and he says that they represent five different personas that I have. He is correlating his empathic abilities with an ensemble that has entropy to encode information about my subconscious mind. These cards come up frequently beyond chance. Many occultists who have run into me are probably familiar with who is my Queen of Spades aspect that exemplifies the Evil Queen archetype.
While we are on the topic, formats like JPG and Computer Vision (CV) use Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to convert blocks of pixel data from the spatial domain (the original image) into the frequency domain (represented by coefficients). It does this by decomposing the image into a sum of cosine functions of different frequencies. The DCT represents the image data as a set of coefficients corresponding to different frequencies. Lower frequencies represent smooth variations in color and intensity, while higher frequencies represent rapid changes, such as edges or fine details. This means that any occult image that can be encoded as a JPEG is composed of sines and cosines, indicating that the image possesses harmonics. This means that any sigil or magical seal encoded in a JPG format is an image composed of sines and cosines that can be minimally represented with n modulo 2. If you encode the magical texts or magical seals into a digital image, it has a harmonic and binary representation.
I’ve been experimenting with the interplay of harmonics, entropy, and image formats to manipulate Johnson–Nyquist noise or randomness from beam splitters and laser pointers, with the aim of conjuring digital images and sigils directly through magic. My endeavors have involved extensive research and experimentation. However, regrettably, given the increasing radicalization within occult and paranormal communities, it’s too dangerous, irresponsible, and unethical to allow this knowledge to fall into their hands.
Entropy is not necessarily randomness, either, although they are often used interchangeably. Randomness and entropy become interchangeable when entropy is maximized. Entropy is a measurement of an ensemble and the permutations of that ensemble. A system that can be configured differently is thus an entropic system; however, that doesn’t necessarily imply randomness. Randomness implies one configuration being just as likely as another one. Having different permutations doesn’t imply all permutations are equally likely. Factorials can be used to calculate the number of possible arrangements or configurations of a system, which is closely related to its entropy. A maximally entropic system would be random; however, a random system is not necessary for there to a psychic influence, for there just needs to be enough degrees of freedom and entropy.
I think tarot cards denote a particular culture. It’s a signifier of cultural membership. It signals to everyone that you are into occultism and tarot card readers act as guides, so it denotes a particular level of spiritual authority. Tarot card readers would thus be equivalent to an evangelical that does intercessory prayer. Seeing a tarot card reader would be like a Christian seeking a pastor.
We don’t call Music Physics. We call Music Music, and we classify it as an art. To me, magic is the part of the underlying metaphysical aspects. The problem that I have is occultists’ belief that they have a dominance on magic such that people are starting to believe you cannot practice magic without occultism. Honestly, occultism is going down really, really dark paths, and I don’t believe you can spiritually progress while practicing occultism, so, for me, it is imperative to unlink magic and occultism.
A tarot card reader that claims they rely on intuition is a fake. If there were a message encoded in the cards, we could measure the frequencies of particular cards to see if they were random without the interpretation of the tarot card reader, regardless of whether we knew what the message meant. The patterns would be there.
It’s an aesthetic and a token of cultural membership.
#Animism #animistic #ceremonialMagic #ceremonialMagick #chaosMagic #chaosMagick #ChatGPT #cults #divination #DKMU #Hellenism #Hellenistic #hermeticism #husband #LGBTQ #magick #occult #occultism #occultist #occultists #occulture #pagan #paganism #paranormal #Parapsychology #precognition #psychic #Psychokinesis #rune #runes #sigil #sigilMagick #sigils #spiritual #Spirituality #tarot #tarotCards #Thelema #theosophy #Theurgy #witch #witchcraft
-
I frequently get asked if I’m psychic, can I see the future, and if I give readings. The answer is no. I’m big on science and empirical data, so I’ve conducted experiments where I used true randomness from Johnson–Nyquist noise to generate numbers corresponding to pixels or images. I’ll have a control group that I don’t attempt to predict, and an experimental group that I try to predict. I’ve even made beam splitters from laser pointers to generate randomness using the photoelectric effect.
When I tried to sense the future using randomly generated numbers and images, I got most of them right with a p-value less than 0.05. Does this mean I can sense the future? No, because when I compared the randomly generated numbers in the experimental group to the control group and checked to ensure they were approximately random, I discovered that the experimental group wasn’t random. Specifically, I was able to measure a dynamical orbit in the experimental group.
I describe the psychic influence of magical forces as a chaotic force. Therefore, I would say that magic drawing its power from the noetic sphere is a force of chaos. My empirical measurement and observation of how I affect truly random processes in ways that create dynamical orbits is a reason why. By creating dynamical orbits in random data, my psychic influence inserts chaos into the system. Chaos in dynamical systems is characterized by a non-linear rate of change. Chaotic systems are deterministic because their behavior is entirely determined by initial conditions. This distinguishes them from stochastic systems, which involve inherent randomness or disorder in their behavior.
In shifting the future, I am breaking the symmetry of unitary properties of the system to create topological defects. This affects the ionization energy of particles. In the context of muons and ionization energy, this could cause an interaction with an atomic nucleus in a way that leads to a transition with a change in flavor. It creates a break in the evolution of the system and then restructures that gap with information that is inserted into the system such that the past and the future are shifted. Psychic influence creates a teleological influence where the only future that is possible is the one it has created thereby making it deterministic and chaotic via a dynamical orbit and attractor.
I did these experiments multiple times and had my husband do this as well. He was able to predict the future random images, while both the control and experimental data remained random. Whereas with me, there was always a dynamical orbit, even though I got most of it right with a p-value less than 0.05.
This means I can’t predict the future psychically, because I influence future probabilities to conform to what I expect it to be. It appears like I am predicting the future, but I am actually changing it. So, if I tried to give someone a reading, I would be prescribing and not predicting their future. My biases would shift the cards. I’m pessimistic and cynical, so I would negatively affect the future, so I avoid trying to look into it.
I’ve done a similar exercise with a random walk. I had a person take 1 step at 90, 180, 360, or 270 degrees in a room based on randomly generated numbers. When I tried to predict where they would be at the end of the exercise, I was right, but the numbers exhibited redundancy, a pattern, and a signature, and the Geiger counter registered weird stuff, as did the cloud chamber we created to visualize it. Here is a Youtube video on how to make a cloud chamber:
I bias the future when I try to see it. My husband can see the future. I can’t.
This means that in trying to sense the future, I influence the ionization energy of muons, alpha radiation, and cosmic rays to force the future into a state I expect it to be. I’m influencing the probability distribution of electrons to influence ionization energy. I influence the probability of the electrons being close or far from the nucleus, which affects ionization energy. I can’t see the future, but I can control radiation when I try. So, no, I can’t give readings but I can deflect radioactive particles.
Here is the interesting philosophical question: Am I changing the future or am I creating a new reality? As I stated, the process is chaotic, and chaotic systems are deterministic. Most people incorrectly believe that the ability to see the future, change the future, or influence the future and the past proves that histories are mutable and not deterministic. That is not necessarily the case.
In many high-level programming languages, there are mutable and immutable data types. This text would be a string data type. In Python, for example, you cannot change a string. Here is an example:
x = “This is an example.”
x = “This is an example where I changed something.”We intuitively think that we changed x. We did not. They are not the same object. They are two different objects. What we did was create a new instance of a string with the changes that we wanted, and we pointed x to that new object so that x now references that new object. We have two different string objects where we have created a new string. A new string had to be created because the original string is immutable.
Different histories are different realities. If the future is similarly immutable and deterministic, then my husband’s ability to see the future and my ability to influence the future both either create new futures and new realities or it changes vectors, tensors, and scalars such that there is a translation to a different existing reality. A translation to a different reality would be like me teleporting everything to a different reality. Am I simply changing the future and restructuring things on a subatomic level, or am I creating entirely new bubbles of realities? The problem with multiverse stuff and cosmological discussions about determinism and whether all moments in time all exist at the same time is that they are largely unfalsifiable. So, I am skeptical of the idea that I am creating new realities, but it is plausible.
#Animism #animistic #astrological #astrology #ChaosTheory #clairvoyance #divination #elderFuthark #ESP #ExtrasensoryPerception #magick #multiverse #occult #occultism #pagan #paganism #paranormal #Parapsychology #PK #precognition #psychic #Psychokinesis #rune #runes #sorcery #tarot #tarotCards #witchcraft
-
I frequently get asked if I’m psychic, can I see the future, and if I give readings. The answer is no. I’m big on science and empirical data, so I’ve conducted experiments where I used true randomness from Johnson–Nyquist noise to generate numbers corresponding to pixels or images. I’ll have a control group that I don’t attempt to predict, and an experimental group that I try to predict. I’ve even made beam splitters from laser pointers to generate randomness using the photoelectric effect.
When I tried to sense the future using randomly generated numbers and images, I got most of them right with a p-value less than 0.05. Does this mean I can sense the future? No, because when I compared the randomly generated numbers in the experimental group to the control group and checked to ensure they were approximately random, I discovered that the experimental group wasn’t random. Specifically, I was able to measure a dynamical orbit in the experimental group.
I describe the psychic influence of magical forces as a chaotic force. Therefore, I would say that magic drawing its power from the noetic sphere is a force of chaos. My empirical measurement and observation of how I affect truly random processes in ways that create dynamical orbits is a reason why. By creating dynamical orbits in random data, my psychic influence inserts chaos into the system. Chaos in dynamical systems is characterized by a non-linear rate of change. Chaotic systems are deterministic because their behavior is entirely determined by initial conditions. This distinguishes them from stochastic systems, which involve inherent randomness or disorder in their behavior.
In shifting the future, I am breaking the symmetry of unitary properties of the system to create topological defects. This affects the ionization energy of particles. In the context of muons and ionization energy, this could cause an interaction with an atomic nucleus in a way that leads to a transition with a change in flavor. It creates a break in the evolution of the system and then restructures that gap with information that is inserted into the system such that the past and the future are shifted. Psychic influence creates a teleological influence where the only future that is possible is the one it has created thereby making it deterministic and chaotic via a dynamical orbit and attractor.
I did these experiments multiple times and had my husband do this as well. He was able to predict the future random images, while both the control and experimental data remained random. Whereas with me, there was always a dynamical orbit, even though I got most of it right with a p-value less than 0.05.
This means I can’t predict the future psychically, because I influence future probabilities to conform to what I expect it to be. It appears like I am predicting the future, but I am actually changing it. So, if I tried to give someone a reading, I would be prescribing and not predicting their future. My biases would shift the cards. I’m pessimistic and cynical, so I would negatively affect the future, so I avoid trying to look into it.
I’ve done a similar exercise with a random walk. I had a person take 1 step at 90, 180, 360, or 270 degrees in a room based on randomly generated numbers. When I tried to predict where they would be at the end of the exercise, I was right, but the numbers exhibited redundancy, a pattern, and a signature, and the Geiger counter registered weird stuff, as did the cloud chamber we created to visualize it. Here is a Youtube video on how to make a cloud chamber:
I bias the future when I try to see it. My husband can see the future. I can’t.
This means that in trying to sense the future, I influence the ionization energy of muons, alpha radiation, and cosmic rays to force the future into a state I expect it to be. I’m influencing the probability distribution of electrons to influence ionization energy. I influence the probability of the electrons being close or far from the nucleus, which affects ionization energy. I can’t see the future, but I can control radiation when I try. So, no, I can’t give readings but I can deflect radioactive particles.
Here is the interesting philosophical question: Am I changing the future or am I creating a new reality? As I stated, the process is chaotic, and chaotic systems are deterministic. Most people incorrectly believe that the ability to see the future, change the future, or influence the future and the past proves that histories are mutable and not deterministic. That is not necessarily the case.
In many high-level programming languages, there are mutable and immutable data types. This text would be a string data type. In Python, for example, you cannot change a string. Here is an example:
x = “This is an example.”
x = “This is an example where I changed something.”We intuitively think that we changed x. We did not. They are not the same object. They are two different objects. What we did was create a new instance of a string with the changes that we wanted, and we pointed x to that new object so that x now references that new object. We have two different string objects where we have created a new string. A new string had to be created because the original string is immutable.
Different histories are different realities. If the future is similarly immutable and deterministic, then my husband’s ability to see the future and my ability to influence the future both either create new futures and new realities or it changes vectors, tensors, and scalars such that there is a translation to a different existing reality. A translation to a different reality would be like me teleporting everything to a different reality. Am I simply changing the future and restructuring things on a subatomic level, or am I creating entirely new bubbles of realities? The problem with multiverse stuff and cosmological discussions about determinism and whether all moments in time all exist at the same time is that they are largely unfalsifiable. So, I am skeptical of the idea that I am creating new realities, but it is plausible.
#Animism #animistic #astrological #astrology #ChaosTheory #clairvoyance #divination #elderFuthark #ESP #ExtrasensoryPerception #magick #multiverse #occult #occultism #pagan #paganism #paranormal #Parapsychology #PK #precognition #psychic #Psychokinesis #rune #runes #sorcery #tarot #tarotCards #witchcraft
-
https://specstories.substack.com/p/6th-sense
#SixthSense - an extra or heightened form of #perception that goes beyond our familiar #senses of #sight, #hearing, #taste, #touch, and #smell. It implies an #intuitive understanding or awareness of things that cannot be explained by our standard #sensory #experiences.
#speculativeencounters #readingcommunity #readers #substack #readersofinstagram #selfdiscovery #intuition #precognition #psychic #clairvoyant #telepathy
-
Listen to the most recent episode: 00047 Gabe Miranda Sr Roundtable discussion The Strangeness Decoded part 04 of 04 @DecodingStrange) https://anchor.fm/perceptionstoday/episodes/00047-Gabe-Miranda-Sr-Roundtable-discussion-The-Strangeness-Decoded-part-04-of-04-e24kuse #DecodingStrange #Strange #Dreams #Nightmare #Precognition #Consciousness #Spotify
-
A.I. is already your downfall, we #know what you are trying you sack of shit!!
https://www.tumblr.com/nandomando/713643645799120896
#precognition #alert #ausgov #auspol #australia #statism #tasgov #taspol #politas #alert #australia #tasmania #lutruwita
-
#Retrocausation, #Precognition and Time Loops with Eric Wargo | Hermitix #Podcast
-
Sometimes googling your own name presents some, ehh, interesting related searches. The lack of past tense here is especially disconcerting.
Who are these people searching for this? What kind of answer are they hoping for? 😶
#Google #Prophesy #Precognition #Foreshadowing -
Is #Precognition Real?
Complex article, take your time and read it while you drink coffee or tea.
Quality material
https://boingboing.net/2022/08/17/is-precognition-real.html
