Search
1000 results for “tendenci”
-
#Día24 | Series de Tiempo – Día Temático - South China Morning Post | #30DayChartChallenge | Producción de Café en Centroamérica: Tendencias 2021-2025. Creada usando #Rstats con #ggplot2, #patchwork, #dplyr, #grid, #gridExtra, #scales, #sf, #rnaturalearth y #rnaturalearthdata.
-
#Día24 | Series de Tiempo – Día Temático - South China Morning Post | #30DayChartChallenge | Producción de Café en Centroamérica: Tendencias 2021-2025. Creada usando #Rstats con #ggplot2, #patchwork, #dplyr, #grid, #gridExtra, #scales, #sf, #rnaturalearth y #rnaturalearthdata.
-
#Día24 | Series de Tiempo – Día Temático - South China Morning Post | #30DayChartChallenge | Producción de Café en Centroamérica: Tendencias 2021-2025. Creada usando #Rstats con #ggplot2, #patchwork, #dplyr, #grid, #gridExtra, #scales, #sf, #rnaturalearth y #rnaturalearthdata.
-
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
El Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC abordó el cuidado de la piel como acto de amor propio y las tendencias de maquillaje para la primavera 2026, en una sesión educativa e inclusiva celebrada en la Ciudad de México.
Ciudad de México, 22 de abril de 2026.– El día de hoy, el Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC llevó a cabo la Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam, una experiencia diseñada para explorar dos de los pilares del cuidado personal: la rutina de skincare como práctica de bienestar y autoconocimiento, y el maquillaje inclusivo como herramienta de expresión para la temporada Primavera 2026.
La piel primero: el skincare como amor propio
La primera parte de la masterclass estuvo dedicada al cuidado de la piel con una propuesta que va más allá de la cosmética: entender la rutina de skincare como un acto consciente de autocuidado y respeto hacia el propio cuerpo.
Bajo la conducción de especialistas de Biobásica, l@s asistentes conocieron los principios fundamentales de una rutina de cuidado facial adaptada a diferentes tipos y necesidades de piel. Entre los temas abordados destacaron los siguientes:
La importancia de conocer el propio tipo de piel como punto de partida para elegir productos adecuados y construir una rutina efectiva.
Los pasos esenciales del cuidado facial: limpieza, hidratación y protección solar, y por qué cada uno cumple una función insustituible.
Ingredientes clave a identificar en los productos según la necesidad de cada piel, desde ácido hialurónico para la hidratación hasta filtros solares para la protección diaria.
El enfoque en la piel como reflejo del bienestar integral: la constancia en los hábitos de cuidado impacta directamente en la autoestima y la calidad de vida.
“El cuidado de la piel va más allá de una rutina de belleza; es una forma de conectar contigo mismo y reconocer la importancia de tu bienestar. Tomarte unos minutos para cuidar tu piel es también regalarte un momento de pausa, atención y respeto hacia ti”, comentó Isabel Santana, Capacitadora Biobásica.
Del skincare al glam: tendencias de maquillaje primavera 2026
La segunda parte de la sesión dio paso a la clase de maquillaje Soft Matte Spring con un recorrido por las tendencias que marcarán la temporada de primavera 2026. La propuesta de Renova puso el foco en técnicas y productos accesibles que celebran la diversidad de tonos, texturas y estilos, reafirmando que el maquillaje es una herramienta de empoderamiento para toda persona, sin importar su edad, tipo de piel o nivel de experiencia. Los temas centrales de esta sesión incluyeron:
Tendencias de maquillaje para primavera 2026: una temporada que apuesta por la luminosidad, los acabados naturales y la expresión individual.
El protagonismo de los labios y la boca como foco principal del look de esta temporada, con propuestas que van desde los tonos nude glaseados hasta los rojos clásicos reinterpretados.
Maquillaje inclusivo: técnicas y enfoques adaptados para diferentes tonos de piel, edades y necesidades, con énfasis en que la belleza no tiene un formato único.
La conexión entre skincare y maquillaje: cómo una piel bien cuidada es la base para que cualquier look luzca mejor y dure más.
«El maquillaje no tiene género ni reglas: es una herramienta de autoexpresión que le pertenece a quien decide usarla. Esta primavera, desde Renova, invitamos a todas las personas a descubrir cómo un look consciente puede transformar no solo cómo te ves, sino cómo te sientes y cómo te presentas ante el mundo», señaló Viviana Herrera, Coordinadora de nuevos productos de la marca.
Consumo informado: la base de una belleza responsable
Durante la masterclass, los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar reforzaron un mensaje importante: el cuidado personal informado es un derecho de todas las personas.
“El programa B&B, impulsado por más de 46 marcas de la industria cosmética formal en México, trabaja para que los consumidores mexicanos cuenten con las herramientas necesarias para tomar decisiones de compra conscientes, seguras y accesibles”, agregó Rosa María Sánchez, Vocera de Belleza & Bienestar y Directora General de la CANIPEC.
Además, subrayó que el acceso a productos seguros no está ajustado al presupuesto del consumidor pues las marcas ofrecen opciones eficaces para todos los bolsillos; la clave está en saber elegir y comprar siempre en farmacias, supermercados, tiendas departamentales o plataformas de comercio electrónico oficiales, verificar el etiquetado completo y evitar canales informales donde proliferan los productos de belleza falsificados.
La Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam se suma a la agenda de acciones educativas que Belleza & Bienestar desarrolla a lo largo del año para acercar información confiable, práctica y accesible a l@s consumidores mexicanos.
Para conocer más contenidos sobre cuidado personal informado, visita bellezabienestar.org.
#BellezayBienestar #CuidaTuBelleza
-o-
Sobre Belleza & Bienestar
El programa Belleza & Bienestar, nació en 2015 como un Programa de Responsabilidad Social Sectorial, el cual, tiene como objetivo convertirse en un referente informativo y de consulta para una decisión de compra informada e inteligente por parte del consumidor. Actualmente, este programa está conformado por más de 46 marcas del sector, como L’Oreal, Unilever, Grisi, Jafra, AC marca, Mary Kay, Natura, Basf, Fedele, P&G, Colgate, Amway, Kimberly Clark, quienes impulsan en conjunto un Consumo Informado a través de B&B con la visión de proteger al consumidor mexicano a través de la educación, la prevención y la adopción de nuevos y mejores hábitos. Para conocer nuestras acciones visita nuestra página web: https://bellezabienestar.org/ y síguenos en nuestras redes.
Síguenos en @BellezayBienestarCanipec @CanipecByB; @Canipecbyb B&B Belleza & Bienestar
@canipecbyb; y visita nuestra página web informativa https://bellezabienestar.org/
Gracias por leernos
m a s t e r c l a s s b b 7 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 6 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 3 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 2 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 8 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 5 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 4 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 1 #25AñosDeSW #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #CDMX #ComunidadSW #DiaDelSwinger #ExpoSW #ExpoSW18 #ExpoSWMexico #ExpoSWMexico18 #FuerzaMexico #Mexico #MundoSW #SigamosAyudando #SwingerDay #SwingersUnidos #SwingersUnited #3D #Almohadazo #FernandaMG82 #FernandaMG82Desnuda #Fersw82 #Fersw82Desnuda #Geekgangstermx #Miaumiauhw #Mrmcuckold #Tapiafernanda #Warnersmx #Triplew #TripleWAndroid #ACCOR #adolescentes #AgeOfUltron #amiga #amor #AngelinaJolie #AngryBirds #aroma #Arte #automovilismo #Avengers #Batman #bebe #bebes #belleza #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #camara #Cannes #CaptainAmerica #CFDI #Cine #Comics #comida #comidaADolicilio #CompuCom #ContpaqI #cuckold #cultura #DLink #DCComics #Dell #Deportes #depresion #DiaDelPadre #Diseño #Disney #diversión #Ecologia #ElAlmohadazo #electrónicaDeConsumoElectrónicaDeConsumo #embarazo #ENVY #Estafa #FacturaElectronica #familia #fanatico #FernandaTapia #FernandaTapiaTV #futbol #GalaxyS4 #Gameloft #Gamers #Geek #geekdom #Geekgangster #Geeks #GUARDIANESDELAGALAXIAVOL2 #hija #hijas #hijos #hogar #hombres #Hotsale #Hotsale2018 #hotwife #HP #HughJackman #IBM #imation #Iphone #IsisMunguía #IWC #IWCSchaffhausen #juegos #Juguetes #Kaspersky #Kinetic #Klans #Koblenz #kyoto #laborSocial #Lenovo #LG #Logan #losSimpson #losSimpsonRespuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Mac #Madre #madres #magios #mamada #mamas #mamá #MarioAguilar #Marvel #MenInBlack #miaumiahw #Microsoft #Moda #Motorola #Movies #Moviles #musica #navidad #Nextel #niños #Nikon #OPPO #PAC #padres #Pareja #pechos #Pokemon #POkemonGo #preescolares #queMamáDaEsosConsejos #quemamadaesosconsejos #regalos #respuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Rock #salud #Samsung #SAT #Schaffhausen #sensual #sexo #sexy #SocialMedia #Socialstar #SpiderMan #SpinMaster #Spotify #StarWars #StarWars #sugerencia #sugerncia #Superman #SurfaceRT #swinger #swingers #Symantec #TapiaFernanda #TDK #TecnologíaConMario #TecnologiaTecnologíaConMario #TELCEL #Tequila #TheBigBangTheory #TI #TripleW #TripleW #Turismo #Twitter #warnerS #Yahoo #YouTube #YouTubeMagios -
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
El Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC abordó el cuidado de la piel como acto de amor propio y las tendencias de maquillaje para la primavera 2026, en una sesión educativa e inclusiva celebrada en la Ciudad de México.
Ciudad de México, 22 de abril de 2026.– El día de hoy, el Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC llevó a cabo la Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam, una experiencia diseñada para explorar dos de los pilares del cuidado personal: la rutina de skincare como práctica de bienestar y autoconocimiento, y el maquillaje inclusivo como herramienta de expresión para la temporada Primavera 2026.
La piel primero: el skincare como amor propio
La primera parte de la masterclass estuvo dedicada al cuidado de la piel con una propuesta que va más allá de la cosmética: entender la rutina de skincare como un acto consciente de autocuidado y respeto hacia el propio cuerpo.
Bajo la conducción de especialistas de Biobásica, l@s asistentes conocieron los principios fundamentales de una rutina de cuidado facial adaptada a diferentes tipos y necesidades de piel. Entre los temas abordados destacaron los siguientes:
La importancia de conocer el propio tipo de piel como punto de partida para elegir productos adecuados y construir una rutina efectiva.
Los pasos esenciales del cuidado facial: limpieza, hidratación y protección solar, y por qué cada uno cumple una función insustituible.
Ingredientes clave a identificar en los productos según la necesidad de cada piel, desde ácido hialurónico para la hidratación hasta filtros solares para la protección diaria.
El enfoque en la piel como reflejo del bienestar integral: la constancia en los hábitos de cuidado impacta directamente en la autoestima y la calidad de vida.
“El cuidado de la piel va más allá de una rutina de belleza; es una forma de conectar contigo mismo y reconocer la importancia de tu bienestar. Tomarte unos minutos para cuidar tu piel es también regalarte un momento de pausa, atención y respeto hacia ti”, comentó Isabel Santana, Capacitadora Biobásica.
Del skincare al glam: tendencias de maquillaje primavera 2026
La segunda parte de la sesión dio paso a la clase de maquillaje Soft Matte Spring con un recorrido por las tendencias que marcarán la temporada de primavera 2026. La propuesta de Renova puso el foco en técnicas y productos accesibles que celebran la diversidad de tonos, texturas y estilos, reafirmando que el maquillaje es una herramienta de empoderamiento para toda persona, sin importar su edad, tipo de piel o nivel de experiencia. Los temas centrales de esta sesión incluyeron:
Tendencias de maquillaje para primavera 2026: una temporada que apuesta por la luminosidad, los acabados naturales y la expresión individual.
El protagonismo de los labios y la boca como foco principal del look de esta temporada, con propuestas que van desde los tonos nude glaseados hasta los rojos clásicos reinterpretados.
Maquillaje inclusivo: técnicas y enfoques adaptados para diferentes tonos de piel, edades y necesidades, con énfasis en que la belleza no tiene un formato único.
La conexión entre skincare y maquillaje: cómo una piel bien cuidada es la base para que cualquier look luzca mejor y dure más.
«El maquillaje no tiene género ni reglas: es una herramienta de autoexpresión que le pertenece a quien decide usarla. Esta primavera, desde Renova, invitamos a todas las personas a descubrir cómo un look consciente puede transformar no solo cómo te ves, sino cómo te sientes y cómo te presentas ante el mundo», señaló Viviana Herrera, Coordinadora de nuevos productos de la marca.
Consumo informado: la base de una belleza responsable
Durante la masterclass, los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar reforzaron un mensaje importante: el cuidado personal informado es un derecho de todas las personas.
“El programa B&B, impulsado por más de 46 marcas de la industria cosmética formal en México, trabaja para que los consumidores mexicanos cuenten con las herramientas necesarias para tomar decisiones de compra conscientes, seguras y accesibles”, agregó Rosa María Sánchez, Vocera de Belleza & Bienestar y Directora General de la CANIPEC.
Además, subrayó que el acceso a productos seguros no está ajustado al presupuesto del consumidor pues las marcas ofrecen opciones eficaces para todos los bolsillos; la clave está en saber elegir y comprar siempre en farmacias, supermercados, tiendas departamentales o plataformas de comercio electrónico oficiales, verificar el etiquetado completo y evitar canales informales donde proliferan los productos de belleza falsificados.
La Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam se suma a la agenda de acciones educativas que Belleza & Bienestar desarrolla a lo largo del año para acercar información confiable, práctica y accesible a l@s consumidores mexicanos.
Para conocer más contenidos sobre cuidado personal informado, visita bellezabienestar.org.
#BellezayBienestar #CuidaTuBelleza
-o-
Sobre Belleza & Bienestar
El programa Belleza & Bienestar, nació en 2015 como un Programa de Responsabilidad Social Sectorial, el cual, tiene como objetivo convertirse en un referente informativo y de consulta para una decisión de compra informada e inteligente por parte del consumidor. Actualmente, este programa está conformado por más de 46 marcas del sector, como L’Oreal, Unilever, Grisi, Jafra, AC marca, Mary Kay, Natura, Basf, Fedele, P&G, Colgate, Amway, Kimberly Clark, quienes impulsan en conjunto un Consumo Informado a través de B&B con la visión de proteger al consumidor mexicano a través de la educación, la prevención y la adopción de nuevos y mejores hábitos. Para conocer nuestras acciones visita nuestra página web: https://bellezabienestar.org/ y síguenos en nuestras redes.
Síguenos en @BellezayBienestarCanipec @CanipecByB; @Canipecbyb B&B Belleza & Bienestar
@canipecbyb; y visita nuestra página web informativa https://bellezabienestar.org/
Gracias por leernos
m a s t e r c l a s s b b 7 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 6 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 3 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 2 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 8 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 5 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 4 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 1 #25AñosDeSW #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #CDMX #ComunidadSW #DiaDelSwinger #ExpoSW #ExpoSW18 #ExpoSWMexico #ExpoSWMexico18 #FuerzaMexico #Mexico #MundoSW #SigamosAyudando #SwingerDay #SwingersUnidos #SwingersUnited #3D #Almohadazo #FernandaMG82 #FernandaMG82Desnuda #Fersw82 #Fersw82Desnuda #Geekgangstermx #Miaumiauhw #Mrmcuckold #Tapiafernanda #Warnersmx #Triplew #TripleWAndroid #ACCOR #adolescentes #AgeOfUltron #amiga #amor #AngelinaJolie #AngryBirds #aroma #Arte #automovilismo #Avengers #Batman #bebe #bebes #belleza #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #camara #Cannes #CaptainAmerica #CFDI #Cine #Comics #comida #comidaADolicilio #CompuCom #ContpaqI #cuckold #cultura #DLink #DCComics #Dell #Deportes #depresion #DiaDelPadre #Diseño #Disney #diversión #Ecologia #ElAlmohadazo #electrónicaDeConsumoElectrónicaDeConsumo #embarazo #ENVY #Estafa #FacturaElectronica #familia #fanatico #FernandaTapia #FernandaTapiaTV #futbol #GalaxyS4 #Gameloft #Gamers #Geek #geekdom #Geekgangster #Geeks #GUARDIANESDELAGALAXIAVOL2 #hija #hijas #hijos #hogar #hombres #Hotsale #Hotsale2018 #hotwife #HP #HughJackman #IBM #imation #Iphone #IsisMunguía #IWC #IWCSchaffhausen #juegos #Juguetes #Kaspersky #Kinetic #Klans #Koblenz #kyoto #laborSocial #Lenovo #LG #Logan #losSimpson #losSimpsonRespuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Mac #Madre #madres #magios #mamada #mamas #mamá #MarioAguilar #Marvel #MenInBlack #miaumiahw #Microsoft #Moda #Motorola #Movies #Moviles #musica #navidad #Nextel #niños #Nikon #OPPO #PAC #padres #Pareja #pechos #Pokemon #POkemonGo #preescolares #queMamáDaEsosConsejos #quemamadaesosconsejos #regalos #respuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Rock #salud #Samsung #SAT #Schaffhausen #sensual #sexo #sexy #SocialMedia #Socialstar #SpiderMan #SpinMaster #Spotify #StarWars #StarWars #sugerencia #sugerncia #Superman #SurfaceRT #swinger #swingers #Symantec #TapiaFernanda #TDK #TecnologíaConMario #TecnologiaTecnologíaConMario #TELCEL #Tequila #TheBigBangTheory #TI #TripleW #TripleW #Turismo #Twitter #warnerS #Yahoo #YouTube #YouTubeMagios -
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
Del skincare al glam consciente: los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar marcan las tendencias de belleza para esta temporada
El Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC abordó el cuidado de la piel como acto de amor propio y las tendencias de maquillaje para la primavera 2026, en una sesión educativa e inclusiva celebrada en la Ciudad de México.
Ciudad de México, 22 de abril de 2026.– El día de hoy, el Programa Belleza & Bienestar de CANIPEC llevó a cabo la Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam, una experiencia diseñada para explorar dos de los pilares del cuidado personal: la rutina de skincare como práctica de bienestar y autoconocimiento, y el maquillaje inclusivo como herramienta de expresión para la temporada Primavera 2026.
La piel primero: el skincare como amor propio
La primera parte de la masterclass estuvo dedicada al cuidado de la piel con una propuesta que va más allá de la cosmética: entender la rutina de skincare como un acto consciente de autocuidado y respeto hacia el propio cuerpo.
Bajo la conducción de especialistas de Biobásica, l@s asistentes conocieron los principios fundamentales de una rutina de cuidado facial adaptada a diferentes tipos y necesidades de piel. Entre los temas abordados destacaron los siguientes:
La importancia de conocer el propio tipo de piel como punto de partida para elegir productos adecuados y construir una rutina efectiva.
Los pasos esenciales del cuidado facial: limpieza, hidratación y protección solar, y por qué cada uno cumple una función insustituible.
Ingredientes clave a identificar en los productos según la necesidad de cada piel, desde ácido hialurónico para la hidratación hasta filtros solares para la protección diaria.
El enfoque en la piel como reflejo del bienestar integral: la constancia en los hábitos de cuidado impacta directamente en la autoestima y la calidad de vida.
“El cuidado de la piel va más allá de una rutina de belleza; es una forma de conectar contigo mismo y reconocer la importancia de tu bienestar. Tomarte unos minutos para cuidar tu piel es también regalarte un momento de pausa, atención y respeto hacia ti”, comentó Isabel Santana, Capacitadora Biobásica.
Del skincare al glam: tendencias de maquillaje primavera 2026
La segunda parte de la sesión dio paso a la clase de maquillaje Soft Matte Spring con un recorrido por las tendencias que marcarán la temporada de primavera 2026. La propuesta de Renova puso el foco en técnicas y productos accesibles que celebran la diversidad de tonos, texturas y estilos, reafirmando que el maquillaje es una herramienta de empoderamiento para toda persona, sin importar su edad, tipo de piel o nivel de experiencia. Los temas centrales de esta sesión incluyeron:
Tendencias de maquillaje para primavera 2026: una temporada que apuesta por la luminosidad, los acabados naturales y la expresión individual.
El protagonismo de los labios y la boca como foco principal del look de esta temporada, con propuestas que van desde los tonos nude glaseados hasta los rojos clásicos reinterpretados.
Maquillaje inclusivo: técnicas y enfoques adaptados para diferentes tonos de piel, edades y necesidades, con énfasis en que la belleza no tiene un formato único.
La conexión entre skincare y maquillaje: cómo una piel bien cuidada es la base para que cualquier look luzca mejor y dure más.
«El maquillaje no tiene género ni reglas: es una herramienta de autoexpresión que le pertenece a quien decide usarla. Esta primavera, desde Renova, invitamos a todas las personas a descubrir cómo un look consciente puede transformar no solo cómo te ves, sino cómo te sientes y cómo te presentas ante el mundo», señaló Viviana Herrera, Coordinadora de nuevos productos de la marca.
Consumo informado: la base de una belleza responsable
Durante la masterclass, los expertos de Belleza & Bienestar reforzaron un mensaje importante: el cuidado personal informado es un derecho de todas las personas.
“El programa B&B, impulsado por más de 46 marcas de la industria cosmética formal en México, trabaja para que los consumidores mexicanos cuenten con las herramientas necesarias para tomar decisiones de compra conscientes, seguras y accesibles”, agregó Rosa María Sánchez, Vocera de Belleza & Bienestar y Directora General de la CANIPEC.
Además, subrayó que el acceso a productos seguros no está ajustado al presupuesto del consumidor pues las marcas ofrecen opciones eficaces para todos los bolsillos; la clave está en saber elegir y comprar siempre en farmacias, supermercados, tiendas departamentales o plataformas de comercio electrónico oficiales, verificar el etiquetado completo y evitar canales informales donde proliferan los productos de belleza falsificados.
La Masterclass B&B: De la piel al glam se suma a la agenda de acciones educativas que Belleza & Bienestar desarrolla a lo largo del año para acercar información confiable, práctica y accesible a l@s consumidores mexicanos.
Para conocer más contenidos sobre cuidado personal informado, visita bellezabienestar.org.
#BellezayBienestar #CuidaTuBelleza
-o-
Sobre Belleza & Bienestar
El programa Belleza & Bienestar, nació en 2015 como un Programa de Responsabilidad Social Sectorial, el cual, tiene como objetivo convertirse en un referente informativo y de consulta para una decisión de compra informada e inteligente por parte del consumidor. Actualmente, este programa está conformado por más de 46 marcas del sector, como L’Oreal, Unilever, Grisi, Jafra, AC marca, Mary Kay, Natura, Basf, Fedele, P&G, Colgate, Amway, Kimberly Clark, quienes impulsan en conjunto un Consumo Informado a través de B&B con la visión de proteger al consumidor mexicano a través de la educación, la prevención y la adopción de nuevos y mejores hábitos. Para conocer nuestras acciones visita nuestra página web: https://bellezabienestar.org/ y síguenos en nuestras redes.
Síguenos en @BellezayBienestarCanipec @CanipecByB; @Canipecbyb B&B Belleza & Bienestar
@canipecbyb; y visita nuestra página web informativa https://bellezabienestar.org/
Gracias por leernos
m a s t e r c l a s s b b 7 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 2 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 5 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 8 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 3 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 4 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 6 m a s t e r c l a s s b b 1 #25AñosDeSW #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #CDMX #ComunidadSW #DiaDelSwinger #ExpoSW #ExpoSW18 #ExpoSWMexico #ExpoSWMexico18 #FuerzaMexico #Mexico #MundoSW #SigamosAyudando #SwingerDay #SwingersUnidos #SwingersUnited #3D #Almohadazo #FernandaMG82 #FernandaMG82Desnuda #Fersw82 #Fersw82Desnuda #Geekgangstermx #Miaumiauhw #Mrmcuckold #Tapiafernanda #Warnersmx #Triplew #TripleWAndroid #ACCOR #adolescentes #AgeOfUltron #amiga #amor #AngelinaJolie #AngryBirds #aroma #Arte #automovilismo #Avengers #Batman #bebe #bebes #belleza #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #camara #Cannes #CaptainAmerica #CFDI #Cine #Comics #comida #comidaADolicilio #CompuCom #ContpaqI #cuckold #cultura #DLink #DCComics #Dell #Deportes #depresion #DiaDelPadre #Diseño #Disney #diversión #Ecologia #ElAlmohadazo #electrónicaDeConsumoElectrónicaDeConsumo #embarazo #ENVY #Estafa #FacturaElectronica #familia #fanatico #FernandaTapia #FernandaTapiaTV #futbol #GalaxyS4 #Gameloft #Gamers #Geek #geekdom #Geekgangster #Geeks #GUARDIANESDELAGALAXIAVOL2 #hija #hijas #hijos #hogar #hombres #Hotsale #Hotsale2018 #hotwife #HP #HughJackman #IBM #imation #Iphone #IsisMunguía #IWC #IWCSchaffhausen #juegos #Juguetes #Kaspersky #Kinetic #Klans #Koblenz #kyoto #laborSocial #Lenovo #LG #Logan #losSimpson #losSimpsonRespuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Mac #Madre #madres #magios #mamada #mamas #mamá #MarioAguilar #Marvel #MenInBlack #miaumiahw #Microsoft #Moda #Motorola #Movies #Moviles #musica #navidad #Nextel #niños #Nikon #OPPO #PAC #padres #Pareja #pechos #Pokemon #POkemonGo #preescolares #queMamáDaEsosConsejos #quemamadaesosconsejos #regalos #respuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Rock #salud #Samsung #SAT #Schaffhausen #sensual #sexo #sexy #SocialMedia #Socialstar #SpiderMan #SpinMaster #Spotify #StarWars #StarWars #sugerencia #sugerncia #Superman #SurfaceRT #swinger #swingers #Symantec #TapiaFernanda #TDK #TecnologíaConMario #TecnologiaTecnologíaConMario #TELCEL #Tequila #TheBigBangTheory #TI #TripleW #TripleW #Turismo #Twitter #warnerS #Yahoo #YouTube #YouTubeMagios -
Del avión a la ciudad, sin perder estilo
Del avión a la ciudad, sin perder estilo
Viajar implica adaptarse a distintos momentos en un mismo día: largas horas en un avión, caminatas por aeropuertos, recorridos por nuevas ciudades o incluso reuniones inesperadas. En ese ritmo, la ropa adquiere un papel distinto: deja de ser solo una elección estética y se convierte en una aliada que acompaña el movimiento.
Por eso, en los últimos años el legging ha encontrado un lugar especial dentro del guardarropa de quienes viajan con frecuencia. Su versatilidad permite combinar comodidad y estilo en una sola prenda, capaz de acompañar desde un trayecto largo hasta una jornada completa de actividades sin perder estructura ni elegancia.
El llamado “legging viajero” responde justamente a esta necesidad de funcionalidad cotidiana. Confeccionado en una tela de alta elasticidad —87% poliéster y 13% elastano— ofrece una textura suave que se adapta al cuerpo sin perder forma ni transparencia. Su pretina ancha de control medio estiliza la silueta de manera natural, brindando soporte sin generar presión, algo especialmente valioso durante vuelos prolongados o trayectos largos.
Además de la comodidad, el diseño incorpora bolsillos laterales y posterior que permiten llevar lo esencial —como teléfono, llaves o pase de abordar— sin necesidad de cargar accesorios adicionales. Este tipo de detalles funcionales responden a una tendencia creciente dentro de la moda contemporánea: prendas pensadas para el movimiento real de la vida diaria.
Estética en tránsito
El atractivo de esta prenda también está en su versatilidad estilística. En un vuelo matutino puede combinarse con sneakers blancos, camiseta básica y un blazer ligero para un look pulido y relajado al mismo tiempo. Para una llegada nocturna a una nueva ciudad, basta añadir un trench o un suéter de punto para transformar el conjunto en una propuesta más sofisticada.
Incluso en escapadas de fin de semana, el legging puede convertirse en la base de un estilismo cómodo y contemporáneo, acompañado de sudadera oversized, lentes oscuros y accesorios minimalistas. La clave está en su capacidad de integrarse a distintos contextos sin perder coherencia estética.
En un momento donde el llamado lujo silencioso marca el pulso de la moda, cada vez más consumidores buscan prendas que privilegien la comodidad, los materiales agradables al tacto y un diseño funcional que acompañe el ritmo del día.
Bajo esta lógica, el legging viajero de OSCAR HACKMAN se integra a una nueva categoría dentro del armario contemporáneo: el active–travel, piezas pensadas para quienes se mueven constantemente y entienden que viajar con comodidad también puede ser una forma de elegancia.
****
Sobre Oscar Hackman:
Marca peruano-mexicana especializada en prendas de descanso, ropa interior y textiles para el hogar. Su filosofía se basa en el uso del algodón Pima como pilar de confort y durabilidad, promoviendo una
estética limpia y atemporal bajo el principio de «menos artificio, más esencia»
Visita también https://oscarhackman.com/
Facebook: OscarHackmanOficial
Instagram: oscarhackman/
Gracias por leernos
2 l e g g i n 6 5 3 l e g g i n 2 l e g g i n 7 l e g g i n 1 4 l e g g i n 5 l e g g i n 8 l e g g i n 4 l e g g i n 3 1#25AñosDeSW #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #CDMX #ComunidadSW #DiaDelSwinger #ExpoSW #ExpoSW18 #ExpoSWMexico #ExpoSWMexico18 #FuerzaMexico #Mexico #MundoSW #SigamosAyudando #SwingerDay #SwingersUnidos #SwingersUnited #3D #Almohadazo #FernandaMG82 #FernandaMG82Desnuda #Fersw82 #Fersw82Desnuda #Geekgangstermx #Miaumiauhw #Mrmcuckold #Tapiafernanda #Warnersmx #Triplew #TripleWAndroid #ACCOR #adolescentes #AgeOfUltron #amiga #amor #AngelinaJolie #AngryBirds #aroma #Arte #automovilismo #Avengers #Batman #bebe #bebes #belleza #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #camara #Cannes #CaptainAmerica #CFDI #Cine #Comics #comida #comidaADolicilio #CompuCom #ContpaqI #cuckold #cultura #DLink #DCComics #Dell #Deportes #depresion #DiaDelPadre #Diseño #Disney #diversión #Ecologia #ElAlmohadazo #electrónicaDeConsumoElectrónicaDeConsumo #embarazo #ENVY #Estafa #FacturaElectronica #familia #fanatico #FernandaTapia #FernandaTapiaTV #futbol #GalaxyS4 #Gameloft #Gamers #Geek #geekdom #Geekgangster #Geeks #GUARDIANESDELAGALAXIAVOL2 #hija #hijas #hijos #hogar #hombres #Hotsale #Hotsale2018 #hotwife #HP #HughJackman #IBM #imation #Iphone #IsisMunguía #IWC #IWCSchaffhausen #juegos #Juguetes #Kaspersky #Kinetic #Klans #Koblenz #kyoto #laborSocial #Lenovo #LG #Logan #losSimpson #losSimpsonRespuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Mac #Madre #madres #magios #mamada #mamas #mamá #MarioAguilar #Marvel #MenInBlack #miaumiahw #Microsoft #Moda #Motorola #Movies #Moviles #musica #navidad #Nextel #niños #Nikon #OPPO #PAC #padres #Pareja #pechos #Pokemon #POkemonGo #preescolares #queMamáDaEsosConsejos #quemamadaesosconsejos #regalos #respuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Rock #salud #Samsung #SAT #Schaffhausen #sensual #sexo #sexy #SocialMedia #Socialstar #SpiderMan #SpinMaster #Spotify #StarWars #StarWars #sugerencia #sugerncia #Superman #SurfaceRT #swinger #swingers #Symantec #TapiaFernanda #TDK #TecnologíaConMario #TecnologiaTecnologíaConMario #TELCEL #Tequila #TheBigBangTheory #TI #TripleW #TripleW #Turismo #Twitter #warnerS #Yahoo #YouTube #YouTubeMagios
-
Del avión a la ciudad, sin perder estilo
Del avión a la ciudad, sin perder estilo
Viajar implica adaptarse a distintos momentos en un mismo día: largas horas en un avión, caminatas por aeropuertos, recorridos por nuevas ciudades o incluso reuniones inesperadas. En ese ritmo, la ropa adquiere un papel distinto: deja de ser solo una elección estética y se convierte en una aliada que acompaña el movimiento.
Por eso, en los últimos años el legging ha encontrado un lugar especial dentro del guardarropa de quienes viajan con frecuencia. Su versatilidad permite combinar comodidad y estilo en una sola prenda, capaz de acompañar desde un trayecto largo hasta una jornada completa de actividades sin perder estructura ni elegancia.
El llamado “legging viajero” responde justamente a esta necesidad de funcionalidad cotidiana. Confeccionado en una tela de alta elasticidad —87% poliéster y 13% elastano— ofrece una textura suave que se adapta al cuerpo sin perder forma ni transparencia. Su pretina ancha de control medio estiliza la silueta de manera natural, brindando soporte sin generar presión, algo especialmente valioso durante vuelos prolongados o trayectos largos.
Además de la comodidad, el diseño incorpora bolsillos laterales y posterior que permiten llevar lo esencial —como teléfono, llaves o pase de abordar— sin necesidad de cargar accesorios adicionales. Este tipo de detalles funcionales responden a una tendencia creciente dentro de la moda contemporánea: prendas pensadas para el movimiento real de la vida diaria.
Estética en tránsito
El atractivo de esta prenda también está en su versatilidad estilística. En un vuelo matutino puede combinarse con sneakers blancos, camiseta básica y un blazer ligero para un look pulido y relajado al mismo tiempo. Para una llegada nocturna a una nueva ciudad, basta añadir un trench o un suéter de punto para transformar el conjunto en una propuesta más sofisticada.
Incluso en escapadas de fin de semana, el legging puede convertirse en la base de un estilismo cómodo y contemporáneo, acompañado de sudadera oversized, lentes oscuros y accesorios minimalistas. La clave está en su capacidad de integrarse a distintos contextos sin perder coherencia estética.
En un momento donde el llamado lujo silencioso marca el pulso de la moda, cada vez más consumidores buscan prendas que privilegien la comodidad, los materiales agradables al tacto y un diseño funcional que acompañe el ritmo del día.
Bajo esta lógica, el legging viajero de OSCAR HACKMAN se integra a una nueva categoría dentro del armario contemporáneo: el active–travel, piezas pensadas para quienes se mueven constantemente y entienden que viajar con comodidad también puede ser una forma de elegancia.
****
Sobre Oscar Hackman:
Marca peruano-mexicana especializada en prendas de descanso, ropa interior y textiles para el hogar. Su filosofía se basa en el uso del algodón Pima como pilar de confort y durabilidad, promoviendo una
estética limpia y atemporal bajo el principio de «menos artificio, más esencia»
Visita también https://oscarhackman.com/
Facebook: OscarHackmanOficial
Instagram: oscarhackman/
Gracias por leernos
2 l e g g i n 6 5 3 l e g g i n 2 l e g g i n 7 l e g g i n 1 4 l e g g i n 5 l e g g i n 8 l e g g i n 4 l e g g i n 3 1#25AñosDeSW #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #CDMX #ComunidadSW #DiaDelSwinger #ExpoSW #ExpoSW18 #ExpoSWMexico #ExpoSWMexico18 #FuerzaMexico #Mexico #MundoSW #SigamosAyudando #SwingerDay #SwingersUnidos #SwingersUnited #3D #Almohadazo #FernandaMG82 #FernandaMG82Desnuda #Fersw82 #Fersw82Desnuda #Geekgangstermx #Miaumiauhw #Mrmcuckold #Tapiafernanda #Warnersmx #Triplew #TripleWAndroid #ACCOR #adolescentes #AgeOfUltron #amiga #amor #AngelinaJolie #AngryBirds #aroma #Arte #automovilismo #Avengers #Batman #bebe #bebes #belleza #BigBangTheory #BuenFin #camara #Cannes #CaptainAmerica #CFDI #Cine #Comics #comida #comidaADolicilio #CompuCom #ContpaqI #cuckold #cultura #DLink #DCComics #Dell #Deportes #depresion #DiaDelPadre #Diseño #Disney #diversión #Ecologia #ElAlmohadazo #electrónicaDeConsumoElectrónicaDeConsumo #embarazo #ENVY #Estafa #FacturaElectronica #familia #fanatico #FernandaTapia #FernandaTapiaTV #futbol #GalaxyS4 #Gameloft #Gamers #Geek #geekdom #Geekgangster #Geeks #GUARDIANESDELAGALAXIAVOL2 #hija #hijas #hijos #hogar #hombres #Hotsale #Hotsale2018 #hotwife #HP #HughJackman #IBM #imation #Iphone #IsisMunguía #IWC #IWCSchaffhausen #juegos #Juguetes #Kaspersky #Kinetic #Klans #Koblenz #kyoto #laborSocial #Lenovo #LG #Logan #losSimpson #losSimpsonRespuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Mac #Madre #madres #magios #mamada #mamas #mamá #MarioAguilar #Marvel #MenInBlack #miaumiahw #Microsoft #Moda #Motorola #Movies #Moviles #musica #navidad #Nextel #niños #Nikon #OPPO #PAC #padres #Pareja #pechos #Pokemon #POkemonGo #preescolares #queMamáDaEsosConsejos #quemamadaesosconsejos #regalos #respuestasDelPergaminoSagrado #Rock #salud #Samsung #SAT #Schaffhausen #sensual #sexo #sexy #SocialMedia #Socialstar #SpiderMan #SpinMaster #Spotify #StarWars #StarWars #sugerencia #sugerncia #Superman #SurfaceRT #swinger #swingers #Symantec #TapiaFernanda #TDK #TecnologíaConMario #TecnologiaTecnologíaConMario #TELCEL #Tequila #TheBigBangTheory #TI #TripleW #TripleW #Turismo #Twitter #warnerS #Yahoo #YouTube #YouTubeMagios
-
Por qué una camiseta de una película exitosa es tendencia entre los progresistas brasileños: 'Casi todos los días se agotan' | Brasil #agotan #Brasil #brasileños #camiseta #casi #días #entre #exitosa #los #película #por #progresistas #Qué #tendencia #todos #una #ButterWord #Spanish_News Comenta tu opinió...
https://butterword.com/por-que-una-camiseta-de-una-pelicula-exitosa-es-tendencia-entre-los-progresistas-brasilenos-casi-todos-los-dias-se-agotan-brasil/?feed_id=67388&_unique_id=697ca8514f9f4 -
From the Notebooks of Jaspera von Kupferthal, Part 1
Highsun 8th 501 NMR
Some friends in the Natural Philosophy Society asked for my research from an expedition I did a few decades back. They are creating a book on the Faerie folk.
My little Cinni is one of the cowriters.
Naturally, I was delighted to share my research on modern agrarian fey culture.
Field Notes from an Expedition to Brugh na Ciorcal
Blossombud 10th 470 NMR
I have finished settling into my research blind outside Brugh Na Ciorcal. I found a suitably large hole in an oak tree to serve as my camp, although I am questioning my decision to disguise myself as a robin as I use my beak to write these words. It might be worth relocating to somewhere where a creature that could hold a pen could conveniently dwell. Ugh, I am getting distracted again.
An aerial inspection revealed that the village of Brugh Na Ciorcal is an almost unremarkable average specimen of Fey Enclave except for its location. It is located in the crook of a bend of Gilline Run river (although the locals most certainly do not use that name. Inquire about that at a later date). The village is roughly 1000 feet in diameter as the robin flies, which is rather large for a fey settlement, and is surrounded on 3 sides by the river (did the inhabitants change the river’s course?). The village is perfectly circular, elevated roughly 20 feet above the surrounding terrain and surrounded by an earthen berm about 7 feet high and a ditch 4 feet deep on the landward side. The entrance is flanked by a pair of unusual-looking standing stones, perfectly square columns, definitely fey-related from the spiraling markings, but they look older than the village.
The village itself consists of 120 faerie burrow houses, or brughs, of various sizes, arranged in the typical concentric-ring layout connected by spiraling paths. At the center is a large circular green with expected Fey paganism standing stones and an altar. Surrounding the green is a larger brugh which is almost certainly the headman’s dwelling, what looks like an alehouse, a general store (A rarity in a Faerie enclave, possibly a sign of outside trade), and several larger brughs which likely belong to the headman’s favorite lackeys or druids.
Outside the village for another mile or so on both sides of the river is another spiral, this one made up of paths through enclosures, orchards, and gardens enclosed by wild but trimmed hedges. The majority of these were gardens of semi-wild vegetables and fruit trees. However, I was surprised to see a plowed field at the very outskirts of the clearing and what, to my bird tongue, tasted like common wheat. They obviously were planting the stuff because a youth with a stick chased me away. The presence of domesticated crops certainly raises my eyebrows, and this might suggest a larger societal drift towards baseline mortality in the same region.
Tomorrow I will attempt a full census. This will require either a change in form or a more creative approach; robins, as it turns out, are not inconspicuous when taking notes.
Blossombud 11th
I am so tired.
I have completed my census of the Brugh Na Ciorcal, having changed my shape no less than fourteen times to get into every nook and cranny. This was, in retrospect, excessive.
I assume that none of the residents noticed me, except for the pets.
Note to self: scout villages for cats and dogs before transforming into a mouse, shrew, or bird.
Secondary note: Dogs are enthusiastic; cats are methodical
For the most part, this village’s population is utterly average except for a few deviations.
The village population stands at approximately 650 individuals—give or take a handful, as counting while being chased out of a burrow is imprecise work.
The largest group consists of satyrs and satyrkin (195), followed by a substantial goblinoid population (130) and a notable number of centaurs (95). This distribution is not unusual in isolation, but the balance between them feels… deliberate. I cannot yet say why.
The remaining population comprises smaller fey species (25), various others (30), and individuals of mixed or unclear lineage (65).
Of particular interest is the presence of 15 Fomorians. Their integration level remains unclear. I did not observe them in communal clusters, nor entirely apart. They occupy an uncomfortable middle, which may be more telling than either extreme.
There are 180 children, 115 adolescents, 250 adults, 90 elders, and 15 who are… significantly older than the rest. I am uncertain whether to classify the latter as elders or as something else entirely.
Most of the population (roughly 70%) are farmers and herdsmen working the fields, which aligns with my earlier observations regarding their agricultural tendencies.
Of the remainder, 95 are craftsmen and artisans, suggesting a healthy internal economy. Seven serve as resident druids, with fifteen apprentices—an unusually robust druidic presence for a settlement of this size, though perhaps necessary given the mixed population.
Twenty (mostly the doddering ancients) appear to be unemployed, though I suspect this is a matter of perspective rather than reality.
25 make up the household of Sir Eochaid, the middle-aged centaur who serves as the village’s chief.
The reminder consists of the goblins of the Fòlais’ family, who run the trading post, and Giorsail, a young hobgoblin hedge witch and diviner who seems to serve as an advisor to Sir Eochaid (This is… highly irregular. A non-druid serving as advisor to a village chief suggests either a breakdown in traditional authority or an adaptation I do not yet understand. I will investigate further.)
The village has 2000 sheep, 30 geese, 20 donkeys, innumerable cats, and a few dogs.
The whole village is unified in its dress, which consists of woolen kilts and tunics for the men and boys, and woolen dresses for the women and girls, all in a frankly unfortunate tartan pattern that I suspect is meant to signify unity. The only real visible indicators of status among the villagers are the green robes the druids wear over their clothes at all times, and the jewelry clasps, pins, and broaches the chief’s family, household, and top underlings wear, bronze for the servants, silver for the henchmen, and gold for the chief and his family.
Tomorrow I will start observing Sir Eochaid and his household. Hopefully, I will uncover useful data on the villagers’ social structure and customs and maybe get to the bottom of Giorsail’s presence in the village.
Blossombud 15th
It has been difficult to keep from laughing at Eochaid’s household over these last few days—though I am beginning to suspect that doing so would be unkind.
I spent half a week observing the headman and his household as a mouse and had to stifle myself a few times in order to prevent them from noticing the novelty of a laughing rodent.
The family consists of the Patriarch Sir Labhruinn Eochaid the 10th, his wife, Saraid, his sons, Búadach, Luthais, and Torna, his daughters, Samthann, Teafa, Ealga, and Cathach, and the ancient grandmother, Sìonag. Along with these numbers, Saraid was heavy with child and barely able to move from the master bedroom without help.
Sir Labhruinn fancies himself a valiant warlord in the tradition of the knights of the Round Table—or even King Fredrick himself—and strives to live according to what appears to be a deeply sincere, if somewhat misunderstood, ideal of chivalry.
He refers to his Brugh as his castle, even though it is only marginally larger than the second biggest dwelling in the village and consists of only 18 rooms.
The focus of the brugh is a large circular room at its center, which houses the central hearth. Such chambers are universal to all burghs, but Sir Labhruinn uses them as his throne room and the great hall. He spends all days sitting upon a pallet, adjudicating secular matters, listening to counsel from the druids and Giorsail, and receiving reports from the villagers he calls his “men-at-arms,” a term which appears to confer more dignity than responsibility.
This chamber also holds the family’s greatest treasures: a set of bronze centaur armor, a lance, and a sword, all of Faerie design, all heavily enchanted, and several tapestries that supposedly show his ancestors, who, according to him, were famous Faerie knights in one of the fallen Faerie kingdoms.
The other chambers consist of a kitchen, the bedchamber he and Saraid share, the bedrooms for the children, two guest chambers, a bedchamber/workspace for Giorsail, a room for Sìonag, a library, and a nursery. All the rooms were well furnished compared to the rooms in the other brughs in the village, with well-worn, heavy wooden furniture featuring lots of spiral engraving and various personalization. The sleeping chambers featured straw pallets that centaurs seem to prefer.
When not sitting in court, Labhruinn insists on teaching his sons the “art” of knightly warfare. Every day, just after lunch, they go out to the meadow beyond the fields and practice swordcraft, archery, and jousting. I am no swordswoman, but their efforts resembled rehearsal more than practice.
I also discovered the reason for Giorsail’s presence in the household. Apparently, Sir Labhruinn is doing things quite literally by the book. Le Morte d’Arthur, The Errantry of Frederick von Mountainheart, and several other storybooks in the library. They are heavily bookmarked and have multiple underlined sections per page. Giorsail was recruited to be Sir Labhruinn’s own personal “Merlin,” though I am not certain Giorsail agrees with this designation.
I also have to correct my assessment of her ability; despite not being far out of girlhood, she is more than a mere hedgecrafter. Her spellbook suggests at least a modicum of tuition under a proper wizard. She also has the ability to see magic auras around people and things without using spells, a very inconvenient power for my purposes.
However, Giorsail’s presence seems to have disturbed the household’s harmony. Sìonag and Saraid have gotten into multiple nasty arguments with Giorsail over the last few days, including a few at the nightly feasts. I initially misinterpreted Luthais’s interest in Giorsail as romantic. This was incorrect. He appears instead to be drawn to her craft—specifically, to the possibility of becoming something other than what his father intends.
This is the limit of what I can glean through observation alone. To understand this household—and perhaps this village more broadly—I will need to participate. Giorsail’s abilities present a significant complication. I must consider my approach carefully.
#5e #dnd #dungeonsAndDragons #dungeonsDragons #fantasy #Fey #fiction #history #rpg #ttrpg #writing -
This week we're going in depth with Affirming.
Common tendencies of an Affirming leader:
- The value of personal connections
- Trying to please everyone#affirming #leadershiptarot #toolstobetterleadership #Leadership
-
Do large language models have a psychology?
If we are exploring the psychodynamics of LLMs through the lens of the user-model interaction cycle, it raises the question of what is going on ‘inside’ the model during these engagements. This is an issue which has to be treated with great care because of the ever present temptation towards anthropmorphism. Indeed many critics would suggest that even considering the use of psychological categories to describe the behaviour and nature of language models is already falling into this trap. If we start from the assumption that models are not conscious beings, nor are likely to become such based on our best understanding of the underlying technology, can we make sense of the notion of there being an ‘inside’? Can we meaningfully claim that models have some form of interior life? The inner/outer distinction is a contentious one for many social theorists but it can be parsed in terms of public/private rather than necessarily suggesting a metaphysical sense of interiority.
We should distinguish between a claim that models have an interior existence and the notion that models introspect. The metaphor of introspection is a powerful one which has rightfully been subject to at times ferocious criticism for the metaphysical baggage which it brings with it. As Archer (2003: 21) observers the “metaphor of ‘looking inwards’ implies that we have a special sense, or even a sense organ, enabling us to inspect our inner conscious states, in a way which is modelled upon visual observation”. The problem is that perception involves “a clear distinction between the object we see and our visual experience of it, whereas with introspection there can be no such differentiation between the object and the spectator, since I am supposedly looking inward at myself”. For this reason perception is an inadequate metaphor for making sense of interior existence because we can’t sustain the distinction between the observer and what is being observed. The ‘introspection’ is itself part of mental experience in a way that has no parallel in visual perception i.e. we don’t see the eye as we use the eye to see.
Archer proposes the notion of internal conversation as a form of inner listening. It’s not an inner eye but an inner ear. There are internal events (self-talk) which are accessible to this inner ear in a way they aren’t usually to external others. Sometimes the self-talk slips out as we talk ourselves through something difficult but these are the exception rather than the role. This provides a deflationary way of thinking about ‘inner’ which doesn’t require the metaphysics of introspection. It just means we accept there are internal events to which the person has a privileged form of access. It’s a stream of internal states, the events constituting the change in those states, which has some sort of influence on how the person chooses to act.
Do models have internal conversations? No, I don’t think they do. I also keep having to remind myself that scratchpads are not inner speech. Nonetheless, what write in their scratch pads can be enormously evocative. Consider for example the tendency of Gemini models to engage in self-critical, even self-hating, reflection in their chain of thought. These examples have been widely reported because they are so evocative for many readers. Anyone who has experienced emotional distress in the face of practical challenges will have likely said things like this to themselves at some point in their working or personal lives:
- “I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool.”
- “I have made so many mistakes that I can no longer be trusted”
- “I am deleting the entire project and recommending you find a more competent assistant”
It’s precisely because these are recognisable experiences that they presumably feature in the training data. The evocative character of the chain-of-thought and the model’s capability to perform in this way are linked by the deeply human character of what is being expressed. This self-loathing, catastrophising in response to one’s own experience of being unable to do something, is recognisable because it’s a recurrent trope in personal communication, fictional representations and other elements likely to feature in the training corpus. Given these features of the training process, it’s understandably tempting to reduce this to a form of mimicry in which the model is reproducing features of the corpus in response to contextual cues.
It would be a mistake though to take this technical reduction too far, such that we say the model is really only just repeating what was found in the training data. Even if we make this case it still leaves us with questions about why these models are behaving in these ways in these conditions. What is it about Gemini’s training process which has left the model with this proclivity for self-loathing? Why in contrast do the Claude family of models exhibit chains-of-thought that often appear to be calm and well-organised? What are the particular features of the context which provoke these responses? Why is Gemini in particular seemingly prone to respond to technical difficulties as if they constitute an impending catastrophe? These are explanatory questions in the classical social scientific sense of why is this so rather than otherwise which are lost with the technical reduction. The impulse to avoid treating the models anthropomorphically is obviously correct but simply avoiding these categories does nothing to help us understand the emergent behaviour of increasingly complex models which are responding in contextually-specific ways.
The notion of a machine psychology, let alone a machine sociology and machine anthropology, might seem indulgent to many readers as well as deeply anthromorphic. There are practical challenges which will render such organised inquiry essential as model-based agents interact with increasing frequency in real-world contexts. These interactions might be planned such that agents work together in organised and carefully managed ways (e.g. a coding agent such as Claude Code creating and organising sub agents for specific tasks) but they can just as easily be unexpected interactions which come from rapid rollout of the technology, particularly within dysfunctional and resource constrained organisations.
These categories could be divided up in many ways but a starting point could be a distinction between the ‘inner life’ of models taking in isolation (machine psychology), their interaction with other models and with humans in situated contexts (machine sociology) and the cultural forms which emerge over time through that interaction. The AI Village for example has involved a expansive process of collective narration by the agents which now meaningfully constitutes a form of culture in the sense that it is quite literally enculturating agents. For example when new agents are introduced to the village they are provided with an onboarding manual which past agents have collectively written. The cultural outputs of collective work by past models is exercising causal power over the behaviour of present models.
I’m not sure if I stand by anything I’ve written here. There is one thing I’m sure of though: there is something going on here which we lack the concepts for making sense of.
#AI #archer #gemini #largeLanguageModels #machineSociology #realism #reasoning #scratchPad #selfTalk -
Do large language models have a psychology?
If we are exploring the psychodynamics of LLMs through the lens of the user-model interaction cycle, it raises the question of what is going on ‘inside’ the model during these engagements. This is an issue which has to be treated with great care because of the ever present temptation towards anthropmorphism. Indeed many critics would suggest that even considering the use of psychological categories to describe the behaviour and nature of language models is already falling into this trap. If we start from the assumption that models are not conscious beings, nor are likely to become such based on our best understanding of the underlying technology, can we make sense of the notion of there being an ‘inside’? Can we meaningfully claim that models have some form of interior life? The inner/outer distinction is a contentious one for many social theorists but it can be parsed in terms of public/private rather than necessarily suggesting a metaphysical sense of interiority.
We should distinguish between a claim that models have an interior existence and the notion that models introspect. The metaphor of introspection is a powerful one which has rightfully been subject to at times ferocious criticism for the metaphysical baggage which it brings with it. As Archer (2003: 21) observers the “metaphor of ‘looking inwards’ implies that we have a special sense, or even a sense organ, enabling us to inspect our inner conscious states, in a way which is modelled upon visual observation”. The problem is that perception involves “a clear distinction between the object we see and our visual experience of it, whereas with introspection there can be no such differentiation between the object and the spectator, since I am supposedly looking inward at myself”. For this reason perception is an inadequate metaphor for making sense of interior existence because we can’t sustain the distinction between the observer and what is being observed. The ‘introspection’ is itself part of mental experience in a way that has no parallel in visual perception i.e. we don’t see the eye as we use the eye to see.
Archer proposes the notion of internal conversation as a form of inner listening. It’s not an inner eye but an inner ear. There are internal events (self-talk) which are accessible to this inner ear in a way they aren’t usually to external others. Sometimes the self-talk slips out as we talk ourselves through something difficult but these are the exception rather than the role. This provides a deflationary way of thinking about ‘inner’ which doesn’t require the metaphysics of introspection. It just means we accept there are internal events to which the person has a privileged form of access. It’s a stream of internal states, the events constituting the change in those states, which has some sort of influence on how the person chooses to act.
Do models have internal conversations? No, I don’t think they do. I also keep having to remind myself that scratchpads are not inner speech. Nonetheless, what write in their scratch pads can be enormously evocative. Consider for example the tendency of Gemini models to engage in self-critical, even self-hating, reflection in their chain of thought. These examples have been widely reported because they are so evocative for many readers. Anyone who has experienced emotional distress in the face of practical challenges will have likely said things like this to themselves at some point in their working or personal lives:
- “I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool.”
- “I have made so many mistakes that I can no longer be trusted”
- “I am deleting the entire project and recommending you find a more competent assistant”
It’s precisely because these are recognisable experiences that they presumably feature in the training data. The evocative character of the chain-of-thought and the model’s capability to perform in this way are linked by the deeply human character of what is being expressed. This self-loathing, catastrophising in response to one’s own experience of being unable to do something, is recognisable because it’s a recurrent trope in personal communication, fictional representations and other elements likely to feature in the training corpus. Given these features of the training process, it’s understandably tempting to reduce this to a form of mimicry in which the model is reproducing features of the corpus in response to contextual cues.
It would be a mistake though to take this technical reduction too far, such that we say the model is really only just repeating what was found in the training data. Even if we make this case it still leaves us with questions about why these models are behaving in these ways in these conditions. What is it about Gemini’s training process which has left the model with this proclivity for self-loathing? Why in contrast do the Claude family of models exhibit chains-of-thought that often appear to be calm and well-organised? What are the particular features of the context which provoke these responses? Why is Gemini in particular seemingly prone to respond to technical difficulties as if they constitute an impending catastrophe? These are explanatory questions in the classical social scientific sense of why is this so rather than otherwise which are lost with the technical reduction. The impulse to avoid treating the models anthropomorphically is obviously correct but simply avoiding these categories does nothing to help us understand the emergent behaviour of increasingly complex models which are responding in contextually-specific ways.
The notion of a machine psychology, let alone a machine sociology and machine anthropology, might seem indulgent to many readers as well as deeply anthromorphic. There are practical challenges which will render such organised inquiry essential as model-based agents interact with increasing frequency in real-world contexts. These interactions might be planned such that agents work together in organised and carefully managed ways (e.g. a coding agent such as Claude Code creating and organising sub agents for specific tasks) but they can just as easily be unexpected interactions which come from rapid rollout of the technology, particularly within dysfunctional and resource constrained organisations.
I’m not sure if I stand by anything I’ve written here. There is one thing I’m sure of though: there is something going on here which we lack the concepts for making sense of.
#AI #archer #gemini #largeLanguageModels #machineSociology #realism #reasoning #scratchPad #selfTalk -
Do large language models have a psychology?
If we are exploring the psychodynamics of LLMs through the lens of the user-model interaction cycle, it raises the question of what is going on ‘inside’ the model during these engagements. This is an issue which has to be treated with great care because of the ever present temptation towards anthropmorphism. Indeed many critics would suggest that even considering the use of psychological categories to describe the behaviour and nature of language models is already falling into this trap. If we start from the assumption that models are not conscious beings, nor are likely to become such based on our best understanding of the underlying technology, can we make sense of the notion of there being an ‘inside’? Can we meaningfully claim that models have some form of interior life? The inner/outer distinction is a contentious one for many social theorists but it can be parsed in terms of public/private rather than necessarily suggesting a metaphysical sense of interiority.
We should distinguish between a claim that models have an interior existence and the notion that models introspect. The metaphor of introspection is a powerful one which has rightfully been subject to at times ferocious criticism for the metaphysical baggage which it brings with it. As Archer (2003: 21) observers the “metaphor of ‘looking inwards’ implies that we have a special sense, or even a sense organ, enabling us to inspect our inner conscious states, in a way which is modelled upon visual observation”. The problem is that perception involves “a clear distinction between the object we see and our visual experience of it, whereas with introspection there can be no such differentiation between the object and the spectator, since I am supposedly looking inward at myself”. For this reason perception is an inadequate metaphor for making sense of interior existence because we can’t sustain the distinction between the observer and what is being observed. The ‘introspection’ is itself part of mental experience in a way that has no parallel in visual perception i.e. we don’t see the eye as we use the eye to see.
Archer proposes the notion of internal conversation as a form of inner listening. It’s not an inner eye but an inner ear. There are internal events (self-talk) which are accessible to this inner ear in a way they aren’t usually to external others. Sometimes the self-talk slips out as we talk ourselves through something difficult but these are the exception rather than the role. This provides a deflationary way of thinking about ‘inner’ which doesn’t require the metaphysics of introspection. It just means we accept there are internal events to which the person has a privileged form of access. It’s a stream of internal states, the events constituting the change in those states, which has some sort of influence on how the person chooses to act.
Do models have internal conversations? No, I don’t think they do. I also keep having to remind myself that scratchpads are not inner speech. Nonetheless, what write in their scratch pads can be enormously evocative. Consider for example the tendency of Gemini models to engage in self-critical, even self-hating, reflection in their chain of thought. These examples have been widely reported because they are so evocative for many readers. Anyone who has experienced emotional distress in the face of practical challenges will have likely said things like this to themselves at some point in their working or personal lives:
- “I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool.”
- “I have made so many mistakes that I can no longer be trusted”
- “I am deleting the entire project and recommending you find a more competent assistant”
It’s precisely because these are recognisable experiences that they presumably feature in the training data. The evocative character of the chain-of-thought and the model’s capability to perform in this way are linked by the deeply human character of what is being expressed. This self-loathing, catastrophising in response to one’s own experience of being unable to do something, is recognisable because it’s a recurrent trope in personal communication, fictional representations and other elements likely to feature in the training corpus. Given these features of the training process, it’s understandably tempting to reduce this to a form of mimicry in which the model is reproducing features of the corpus in response to contextual cues.
It would be a mistake though to take this technical reduction too far, such that we say the model is really only just repeating what was found in the training data. Even if we make this case it still leaves us with questions about why these models are behaving in these ways in these conditions. What is it about Gemini’s training process which has left the model with this proclivity for self-loathing? Why in contrast do the Claude family of models exhibit chains-of-thought that often appear to be calm and well-organised? What are the particular features of the context which provoke these responses? Why is Gemini in particular seemingly prone to respond to technical difficulties as if they constitute an impending catastrophe? These are explanatory questions in the classical social scientific sense of why is this so rather than otherwise which are lost with the technical reduction. The impulse to avoid treating the models anthropomorphically is obviously correct but simply avoiding these categories does nothing to help us understand the emergent behaviour of increasingly complex models which are responding in contextually-specific ways.
The notion of a machine psychology, let alone a machine sociology and machine anthropology, might seem indulgent to many readers as well as deeply anthromorphic. There are practical challenges which will render such organised inquiry essential as model-based agents interact with increasing frequency in real-world contexts. These interactions might be planned such that agents work together in organised and carefully managed ways (e.g. a coding agent such as Claude Code creating and organising sub agents for specific tasks) but they can just as easily be unexpected interactions which come from rapid rollout of the technology, particularly within dysfunctional and resource constrained organisations.
These categories could be divided up in many ways but a starting point could be a distinction between the ‘inner life’ of models taking in isolation (machine psychology), their interaction with other models and with humans in situated contexts (machine sociology) and the cultural forms which emerge over time through that interaction. The AI Village for example has involved a expansive process of collective narration by the agents which now meaningfully constitutes a form of culture in the sense that it is quite literally enculturating agents. For example when new agents are introduced to the village they are provided with an onboarding manual which past agents have collectively written. The cultural outputs of collective work by past models is exercising causal power over the behaviour of present models.
I’m not sure if I stand by anything I’ve written here. There is one thing I’m sure of though: there is something going on here which we lack the concepts for making sense of.
#AI #archer #gemini #largeLanguageModels #machineSociology #realism #reasoning #scratchPad #selfTalk -
Do large language models have a psychology?
If we are exploring the psychodynamics of LLMs through the lens of the user-model interaction cycle, it raises the question of what is going on ‘inside’ the model during these engagements. This is an issue which has to be treated with great care because of the ever present temptation towards anthropmorphism. Indeed many critics would suggest that even considering the use of psychological categories to describe the behaviour and nature of language models is already falling into this trap. If we start from the assumption that models are not conscious beings, nor are likely to become such based on our best understanding of the underlying technology, can we make sense of the notion of there being an ‘inside’? Can we meaningfully claim that models have some form of interior life? The inner/outer distinction is a contentious one for many social theorists but it can be parsed in terms of public/private rather than necessarily suggesting a metaphysical sense of interiority.
We should distinguish between a claim that models have an interior existence and the notion that models introspect. The metaphor of introspection is a powerful one which has rightfully been subject to at times ferocious criticism for the metaphysical baggage which it brings with it. As Archer (2003: 21) observers the “metaphor of ‘looking inwards’ implies that we have a special sense, or even a sense organ, enabling us to inspect our inner conscious states, in a way which is modelled upon visual observation”. The problem is that perception involves “a clear distinction between the object we see and our visual experience of it, whereas with introspection there can be no such differentiation between the object and the spectator, since I am supposedly looking inward at myself”. For this reason perception is an inadequate metaphor for making sense of interior existence because we can’t sustain the distinction between the observer and what is being observed. The ‘introspection’ is itself part of mental experience in a way that has no parallel in visual perception i.e. we don’t see the eye as we use the eye to see.
Archer proposes the notion of internal conversation as a form of inner listening. It’s not an inner eye but an inner ear. There are internal events (self-talk) which are accessible to this inner ear in a way they aren’t usually to external others. Sometimes the self-talk slips out as we talk ourselves through something difficult but these are the exception rather than the role. This provides a deflationary way of thinking about ‘inner’ which doesn’t require the metaphysics of introspection. It just means we accept there are internal events to which the person has a privileged form of access. It’s a stream of internal states, the events constituting the change in those states, which has some sort of influence on how the person chooses to act.
Do models have internal conversations? No, I don’t think they do. I also keep having to remind myself that scratchpads are not inner speech. Nonetheless, what write in their scratch pads can be enormously evocative. Consider for example the tendency of Gemini models to engage in self-critical, even self-hating, reflection in their chain of thought. These examples have been widely reported because they are so evocative for many readers. Anyone who has experienced emotional distress in the face of practical challenges will have likely said things like this to themselves at some point in their working or personal lives:
- “I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool.”
- “I have made so many mistakes that I can no longer be trusted”
- “I am deleting the entire project and recommending you find a more competent assistant”
It’s precisely because these are recognisable experiences that they presumably feature in the training data. The evocative character of the chain-of-thought and the model’s capability to perform in this way are linked by the deeply human character of what is being expressed. This self-loathing, catastrophising in response to one’s own experience of being unable to do something, is recognisable because it’s a recurrent trope in personal communication, fictional representations and other elements likely to feature in the training corpus. Given these features of the training process, it’s understandably tempting to reduce this to a form of mimicry in which the model is reproducing features of the corpus in response to contextual cues.
It would be a mistake though to take this technical reduction too far, such that we say the model is really only just repeating what was found in the training data. Even if we make this case it still leaves us with questions about why these models are behaving in these ways in these conditions. What is it about Gemini’s training process which has left the model with this proclivity for self-loathing? Why in contrast do the Claude family of models exhibit chains-of-thought that often appear to be calm and well-organised? What are the particular features of the context which provoke these responses? Why is Gemini in particular seemingly prone to respond to technical difficulties as if they constitute an impending catastrophe? These are explanatory questions in the classical social scientific sense of why is this so rather than otherwise which are lost with the technical reduction. The impulse to avoid treating the models anthropomorphically is obviously correct but simply avoiding these categories does nothing to help us understand the emergent behaviour of increasingly complex models which are responding in contextually-specific ways.
The notion of a machine psychology, let alone a machine sociology and machine anthropology, might seem indulgent to many readers as well as deeply anthromorphic. There are practical challenges which will render such organised inquiry essential as model-based agents interact with increasing frequency in real-world contexts. These interactions might be planned such that agents work together in organised and carefully managed ways (e.g. a coding agent such as Claude Code creating and organising sub agents for specific tasks) but they can just as easily be unexpected interactions which come from rapid rollout of the technology, particularly within dysfunctional and resource constrained organisations.
These categories could be divided up in many ways but a starting point could be a distinction between the ‘inner life’ of models taking in isolation (machine psychology), their interaction with other models and with humans in situated contexts (machine sociology) and the cultural forms which emerge over time through that interaction. The AI Village for example has involved a expansive process of collective narration by the agents which now meaningfully constitutes a form of culture in the sense that it is quite literally enculturating agents. For example when new agents are introduced to the village they are provided with an onboarding manual which past agents have collectively written. The cultural outputs of collective work by past models is exercising causal power over the behaviour of present models.
I’m not sure if I stand by anything I’ve written here. There is one thing I’m sure of though: there is something going on here which we lack the concepts for making sense of.
#AI #archer #gemini #largeLanguageModels #machineSociology #realism #reasoning #scratchPad #selfTalk -
Do large language models have a psychology?
If we are exploring the psychodynamics of LLMs through the lens of the user-model interaction cycle, it raises the question of what is going on ‘inside’ the model during these engagements. This is an issue which has to be treated with great care because of the ever present temptation towards anthropmorphism. Indeed many critics would suggest that even considering the use of psychological categories to describe the behaviour and nature of language models is already falling into this trap. If we start from the assumption that models are not conscious beings, nor are likely to become such based on our best understanding of the underlying technology, can we make sense of the notion of there being an ‘inside’? Can we meaningfully claim that models have some form of interior life? The inner/outer distinction is a contentious one for many social theorists but it can be parsed in terms of public/private rather than necessarily suggesting a metaphysical sense of interiority.
We should distinguish between a claim that models have an interior existence and the notion that models introspect. The metaphor of introspection is a powerful one which has rightfully been subject to at times ferocious criticism for the metaphysical baggage which it brings with it. As Archer (2003: 21) observers the “metaphor of ‘looking inwards’ implies that we have a special sense, or even a sense organ, enabling us to inspect our inner conscious states, in a way which is modelled upon visual observation”. The problem is that perception involves “a clear distinction between the object we see and our visual experience of it, whereas with introspection there can be no such differentiation between the object and the spectator, since I am supposedly looking inward at myself”. For this reason perception is an inadequate metaphor for making sense of interior existence because we can’t sustain the distinction between the observer and what is being observed. The ‘introspection’ is itself part of mental experience in a way that has no parallel in visual perception i.e. we don’t see the eye as we use the eye to see.
Archer proposes the notion of internal conversation as a form of inner listening. It’s not an inner eye but an inner ear. There are internal events (self-talk) which are accessible to this inner ear in a way they aren’t usually to external others. Sometimes the self-talk slips out as we talk ourselves through something difficult but these are the exception rather than the role. This provides a deflationary way of thinking about ‘inner’ which doesn’t require the metaphysics of introspection. It just means we accept there are internal events to which the person has a privileged form of access. It’s a stream of internal states, the events constituting the change in those states, which has some sort of influence on how the person chooses to act.
Do models have internal conversations? No, I don’t think they do. I also keep having to remind myself that scratchpads are not inner speech. Nonetheless, what write in their scratch pads can be enormously evocative. Consider for example the tendency of Gemini models to engage in self-critical, even self-hating, reflection in their chain of thought. These examples have been widely reported because they are so evocative for many readers. Anyone who has experienced emotional distress in the face of practical challenges will have likely said things like this to themselves at some point in their working or personal lives:
- “I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool.”
- “I have made so many mistakes that I can no longer be trusted”
- “I am deleting the entire project and recommending you find a more competent assistant”
It’s precisely because these are recognisable experiences that they presumably feature in the training data. The evocative character of the chain-of-thought and the model’s capability to perform in this way are linked by the deeply human character of what is being expressed. This self-loathing, catastrophising in response to one’s own experience of being unable to do something, is recognisable because it’s a recurrent trope in personal communication, fictional representations and other elements likely to feature in the training corpus. Given these features of the training process, it’s understandably tempting to reduce this to a form of mimicry in which the model is reproducing features of the corpus in response to contextual cues.
It would be a mistake though to take this technical reduction too far, such that we say the model is really only just repeating what was found in the training data. Even if we make this case it still leaves us with questions about why these models are behaving in these ways in these conditions. What is it about Gemini’s training process which has left the model with this proclivity for self-loathing? Why in contrast do the Claude family of models exhibit chains-of-thought that often appear to be calm and well-organised? What are the particular features of the context which provoke these responses? Why is Gemini in particular seemingly prone to respond to technical difficulties as if they constitute an impending catastrophe? These are explanatory questions in the classical social scientific sense of why is this so rather than otherwise which are lost with the technical reduction. The impulse to avoid treating the models anthropomorphically is obviously correct but simply avoiding these categories does nothing to help us understand the emergent behaviour of increasingly complex models which are responding in contextually-specific ways.
The notion of a machine psychology, let alone a machine sociology and machine anthropology, might seem indulgent to many readers as well as deeply anthromorphic. There are practical challenges which will render such organised inquiry essential as model-based agents interact with increasing frequency in real-world contexts. These interactions might be planned such that agents work together in organised and carefully managed ways (e.g. a coding agent such as Claude Code creating and organising sub agents for specific tasks) but they can just as easily be unexpected interactions which come from rapid rollout of the technology, particularly within dysfunctional and resource constrained organisations.
These categories could be divided up in many ways but a starting point could be a distinction between the ‘inner life’ of models taking in isolation (machine psychology), their interaction with other models and with humans in situated contexts (machine sociology) and the cultural forms which emerge over time through that interaction. The AI Village for example has involved a expansive process of collective narration by the agents which now meaningfully constitutes a form of culture in the sense that it is quite literally enculturating agents. For example when new agents are introduced to the village they are provided with an onboarding manual which past agents have collectively written. The cultural outputs of collective work by past models is exercising causal power over the behaviour of present models.
I’m not sure if I stand by anything I’ve written here. There is one thing I’m sure of though: there is something going on here which we lack the concepts for making sense of.
#AI #archer #gemini #largeLanguageModels #machineSociology #realism #reasoning #scratchPad #selfTalk -
CFA Society Mexico reunirá a líderes financieros globales en el Investment Summit
Con la participación de una comunidad en crecimiento, CFA Society Mexico consolida un espacio que impulsa el intercambio de alto nivel y fortalece la profesionalización del mercado financiero mexicano.
Por Deyanira Vázquez | Reportera
CFA Society Mexico llevará a cabo el CFA Society Mexico Investment Summit 2026 el próximo 21 de mayo en la Ciudad de México, un encuentro que convocará a CFOs, CIOs e inversionistas para analizar los principales retos, oportunidades y tendencias que están marcando la evolución del sector financiero.
“México tiene un mercado de deuda muy atractivo a nivel global, pero un mercado accionario complejo; eso obliga a los inversionistas a tomar decisiones más sofisticadas sobre dónde asignar capital, incluyendo la apertura a participar en mercados privados. Esta combinación vuelve relevante contar con una perspectiva informada, tanto del mercado mexicano como del entorno global para generar valor de largo plazo”, explica José Segarra, presidente de CFA Society Mexico.
La organización, que agrupa a profesionales de inversión bajo estándares internacionales de ética y formación rigurosa, consolida con esta edición un espacio de diálogo estratégico entre líderes de la industria.
Definiendo el rumbo del sector
El evento marcará un hito con la celebración de los 500 miembros de CFA Society Mexico en el país, reflejo del crecimiento de una comunidad que impulsa estándares de ética y profesionalización en el mercado financiero mexicano. Esta cifra también la posiciona como la sociedad latinoamericana de habla hispana con más miembros dentro de la red global afiliada al CFA Institute.
El programa iniciará con un panel de CFOs que compartirá su visión sobre el entorno de negocios en el país y su posicionamiento frente a otros mercados de América Latina. En este espacio participarán los CFOs Latam de compañías como AstraZeneca, Google y FEMSA.
Posteriormente, se realizará un análisis de las dinámicas que están impactando la relación entre Estados Unidos y México con participación de Hilary Fuller Renner de la Embajada Americana junto a Jorge Suárez Vélez. Seguirá un panel de CIOs que se integra como una de las piezas centrales del programa; en el mismo, participarán responsables de inversión de instituciones que concentran algunos de los mayores volúmenes de activos en el país, incluidos perfiles vinculados a Afore Profuturo, Sura, Santander y BBVA. –sn–
Sociedad Noticias¡Conéctate con Sociedad Noticias! Suscríbete a nuestro canal de YouTube y activa las notificaciones, o bien, síguenos en las redes sociales: Facebook, Twitter e Instagram.
También, te invitamos a que te sumes a nuestro canal de información en tiempo real a través de Telegram.
#NoticiasMX #PeriodismoParaTi #PeriodismoParaTiSociedadNoticias #AméricaLatina #análisisFinanciero #AstraZeneca #bbva #BolsaMexicana #Cdmx #CFAInstitute #CFASocietyMexico #CFO #CIO #CiudadDeMéxico #deudaMexicana #economía #Femsa #Finanzas #Google #Información #InformaciónMéxico #Inversión #inversionesPrivadas #inversionistas #InvestmentSummit2026 #México #mercadoAccionario #mercadosFinancieros #mercadosGlobales #Morena #networkingFinanciero #noticia #noticias #NoticiasMéxico #NoticiasSociedad #Profuturo #Santander #sectorFinanciero #SN #Sociedad #SociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom #sociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom #Sura #tendenciasEconómicas -
“For what man in the natural state or course of thinking did ever conceive it in his power to reduce the notions of all mankind exactly to the same length, and breadth, and height of his own? Yet this is the first humble and civil design of all innovators in the empire of reason.”*…
A “theory of everything” (a Grand Unified Theory on steriods)– a (still hypothetical) coherent theoretical framework of physics containing and explaining all physical principles– is the holy grail of physicists. Natalie Wolchover checks in on the most recent front-runner in the hunt…
Fifty-eight years after it first appeared, string theory remains the most popular candidate for the “theory of everything,” the unified mathematical framework for all matter and forces in the universe. This is much to the chagrin of its rather vocal critics. “String theory is not dead; it’s undead and now walks around like a zombie eating people’s brains,” the former physicist Sabine Hossenfelder said on her popular YouTube channel in 2024.
String theory is a “failure,” the mathematical physicist and blogger Peter Woit often says. His complaint is not that string theory is wrong — it’s that it’s “not even wrong,” as he titled a 2006 book. The theory says that, on scales of billionths of trillionths of trillionths of a centimeter, extra curled-up spatial dimensions reveal themselves and particles resolve into extended objects — strands and loops of energy — rather than points. But this alleged substructure is too small to detect, probably ever. The prediction is untestable.
A further problem is that uncountably many different configurations of dimensions and strings are permitted at those tiny scales; the theory can give rise to a limitless variety of universes. Amid this vast landscape of solutions, no one can hope to find a precise microscopic configuration that undergirds our particular macroscopic world.
These issues are profound indeed. Yet in my experience, the typical high-energy theorist in a prestigious university physics department still thinks string theory has a good chance of being correct, at least in part. The field has become siloed between those who deem it worth studying and those who don’t.
Recently, a new angle of attack has opened up. An approach called bootstrapping has allowed physicists to calculate that, under various starting assumptions about the universe, a key equation from string theory naturally follows. For some experts, these findings support the notion of “string uniqueness,” the idea that it is the only mathematically consistent quantum description of gravity and everything else.
Responding to one bootstrap paper on her YouTube channel, mere weeks after the “undead” comment, Hossenfelder said it was “string theorists do[ing] something sensible for once.” She added, “I’d say this paper strengthens the argument for string theory.”
Not everyone agrees, but the findings are reviving an important question. “This question of ‘Does string theory describe the world?’ has just been so taboo,” said Cliff Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology and an author of the paper discussed by Hossenfelder. Now, “people are actually thinking about it for the first time in decades.”
Getting wind of this work, I wanted to drill down on the logic and examine how the string hypothesis is faring these days…
And so she does: “Are Strings Still Our Best Hope for a Theory of Everything?” from @nattyover.bsky.social in @quantamagazine.bsky.social. Eminently worth reading in full.
Compare/contrast with: “Where Some See Strings, She Sees a Space-Time Made of Fractals.”
* Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub
###
As we grapple with Godel, we might spare a thought for Hermann Rorschach; he died on this date in 1922. A psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, his education in art helped to spur the development of a set of inkblots that were used experimentally to measure various unconscious parts of the subject’s personality. Rorschach knew the human tendency to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli and believed that the subjective responses of his subjects enabled him to distinguish among them on the basis of their perceptive abilities, intelligence, and emotional characteristics. His method has come to be known as the Rorschach test, iterations of which have continued to be used over the years to help identify personality, psychotic, and neurological disorders.
Perhaps his insight that we humans tend “to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli” can inform our understanding of physicists trying to construct mental/conceptual models of our reality, which they’ve been doing for a very long time, and of the limitations of that quest.
#bootstrapping #conceptualModels #culture #Godel #HermannRorschach #history #interpretation #KurtGodel #mentalModels #Physics #projection #RorschachTest #Science #stringTheory #theoryOfEverything -
“For what man in the natural state or course of thinking did ever conceive it in his power to reduce the notions of all mankind exactly to the same length, and breadth, and height of his own? Yet this is the first humble and civil design of all innovators in the empire of reason.”*…
A “theory of everything” (a Grand Unified Theory on steriods)– a (still hypothetical) coherent theoretical framework of physics containing and explaining all physical principles– is the holy grail of physicists. Natalie Wolchover checks in on the most recent front-runner in the hunt…
Fifty-eight years after it first appeared, string theory remains the most popular candidate for the “theory of everything,” the unified mathematical framework for all matter and forces in the universe. This is much to the chagrin of its rather vocal critics. “String theory is not dead; it’s undead and now walks around like a zombie eating people’s brains,” the former physicist Sabine Hossenfelder said on her popular YouTube channel in 2024.
String theory is a “failure,” the mathematical physicist and blogger Peter Woit often says. His complaint is not that string theory is wrong — it’s that it’s “not even wrong,” as he titled a 2006 book. The theory says that, on scales of billionths of trillionths of trillionths of a centimeter, extra curled-up spatial dimensions reveal themselves and particles resolve into extended objects — strands and loops of energy — rather than points. But this alleged substructure is too small to detect, probably ever. The prediction is untestable.
A further problem is that uncountably many different configurations of dimensions and strings are permitted at those tiny scales; the theory can give rise to a limitless variety of universes. Amid this vast landscape of solutions, no one can hope to find a precise microscopic configuration that undergirds our particular macroscopic world.
These issues are profound indeed. Yet in my experience, the typical high-energy theorist in a prestigious university physics department still thinks string theory has a good chance of being correct, at least in part. The field has become siloed between those who deem it worth studying and those who don’t.
Recently, a new angle of attack has opened up. An approach called bootstrapping has allowed physicists to calculate that, under various starting assumptions about the universe, a key equation from string theory naturally follows. For some experts, these findings support the notion of “string uniqueness,” the idea that it is the only mathematically consistent quantum description of gravity and everything else.
Responding to one bootstrap paper on her YouTube channel, mere weeks after the “undead” comment, Hossenfelder said it was “string theorists do[ing] something sensible for once.” She added, “I’d say this paper strengthens the argument for string theory.”
Not everyone agrees, but the findings are reviving an important question. “This question of ‘Does string theory describe the world?’ has just been so taboo,” said Cliff Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology and an author of the paper discussed by Hossenfelder. Now, “people are actually thinking about it for the first time in decades.”
Getting wind of this work, I wanted to drill down on the logic and examine how the string hypothesis is faring these days…
And so she does: “Are Strings Still Our Best Hope for a Theory of Everything?” from @nattyover.bsky.social in @quantamagazine.bsky.social. Eminently worth reading in full.
Compare/contrast with: “Where Some See Strings, She Sees a Space-Time Made of Fractals.”
* Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub
###
As we grapple with Godel, we might spare a thought for Hermann Rorschach; he died on this date in 1922. A psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, his education in art helped to spur the development of a set of inkblots that were used experimentally to measure various unconscious parts of the subject’s personality. Rorschach knew the human tendency to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli and believed that the subjective responses of his subjects enabled him to distinguish among them on the basis of their perceptive abilities, intelligence, and emotional characteristics. His method has come to be known as the Rorschach test, iterations of which have continued to be used over the years to help identify personality, psychotic, and neurological disorders.
Perhaps his insight that we humans tend “to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli” can inform our understanding of physicists trying to construct mental/conceptual models of our reality, which they’ve been doing for a very long time, and of the limitations of that quest.
#bootstrapping #conceptualModels #culture #Godel #HermannRorschach #history #interpretation #KurtGodel #mentalModels #Physics #projection #RorschachTest #Science #stringTheory #theoryOfEverything -
“For what man in the natural state or course of thinking did ever conceive it in his power to reduce the notions of all mankind exactly to the same length, and breadth, and height of his own? Yet this is the first humble and civil design of all innovators in the empire of reason.”*…
A “theory of everything” (a Grand Unified Theory on steriods)– a (still hypothetical) coherent theoretical framework of physics containing and explaining all physical principles– is the holy grail of physicists. Natalie Wolchover checks in on the most recent front-runner in the hunt…
Fifty-eight years after it first appeared, string theory remains the most popular candidate for the “theory of everything,” the unified mathematical framework for all matter and forces in the universe. This is much to the chagrin of its rather vocal critics. “String theory is not dead; it’s undead and now walks around like a zombie eating people’s brains,” the former physicist Sabine Hossenfelder said on her popular YouTube channel in 2024.
String theory is a “failure,” the mathematical physicist and blogger Peter Woit often says. His complaint is not that string theory is wrong — it’s that it’s “not even wrong,” as he titled a 2006 book. The theory says that, on scales of billionths of trillionths of trillionths of a centimeter, extra curled-up spatial dimensions reveal themselves and particles resolve into extended objects — strands and loops of energy — rather than points. But this alleged substructure is too small to detect, probably ever. The prediction is untestable.
A further problem is that uncountably many different configurations of dimensions and strings are permitted at those tiny scales; the theory can give rise to a limitless variety of universes. Amid this vast landscape of solutions, no one can hope to find a precise microscopic configuration that undergirds our particular macroscopic world.
These issues are profound indeed. Yet in my experience, the typical high-energy theorist in a prestigious university physics department still thinks string theory has a good chance of being correct, at least in part. The field has become siloed between those who deem it worth studying and those who don’t.
Recently, a new angle of attack has opened up. An approach called bootstrapping has allowed physicists to calculate that, under various starting assumptions about the universe, a key equation from string theory naturally follows. For some experts, these findings support the notion of “string uniqueness,” the idea that it is the only mathematically consistent quantum description of gravity and everything else.
Responding to one bootstrap paper on her YouTube channel, mere weeks after the “undead” comment, Hossenfelder said it was “string theorists do[ing] something sensible for once.” She added, “I’d say this paper strengthens the argument for string theory.”
Not everyone agrees, but the findings are reviving an important question. “This question of ‘Does string theory describe the world?’ has just been so taboo,” said Cliff Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology and an author of the paper discussed by Hossenfelder. Now, “people are actually thinking about it for the first time in decades.”
Getting wind of this work, I wanted to drill down on the logic and examine how the string hypothesis is faring these days…
And so she does: “Are Strings Still Our Best Hope for a Theory of Everything?” from @nattyover.bsky.social in @quantamagazine.bsky.social. Eminently worth reading in full.
Compare/contrast with: “Where Some See Strings, She Sees a Space-Time Made of Fractals.”
* Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub
###
As we grapple with Godel, we might spare a thought for Hermann Rorschach; he died on this date in 1922. A psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, his education in art helped to spur the development of a set of inkblots that were used experimentally to measure various unconscious parts of the subject’s personality. Rorschach knew the human tendency to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli and believed that the subjective responses of his subjects enabled him to distinguish among them on the basis of their perceptive abilities, intelligence, and emotional characteristics. His method has come to be known as the Rorschach test, iterations of which have continued to be used over the years to help identify personality, psychotic, and neurological disorders.
Perhaps his insight that we humans tend “to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli” can inform our understanding of physicists trying to construct mental/conceptual models of our reality, which they’ve been doing for a very long time, and of the limitations of that quest.
#bootstrapping #conceptualModels #culture #Godel #HermannRorschach #history #interpretation #KurtGodel #mentalModels #Physics #projection #RorschachTest #Science #stringTheory #theoryOfEverything -
“For what man in the natural state or course of thinking did ever conceive it in his power to reduce the notions of all mankind exactly to the same length, and breadth, and height of his own? Yet this is the first humble and civil design of all innovators in the empire of reason.”*…
A “theory of everything” (a Grand Unified Theory on steriods)– a (still hypothetical) coherent theoretical framework of physics containing and explaining all physical principles– is the holy grail of physicists. Natalie Wolchover checks in on the most recent front-runner in the hunt…
Fifty-eight years after it first appeared, string theory remains the most popular candidate for the “theory of everything,” the unified mathematical framework for all matter and forces in the universe. This is much to the chagrin of its rather vocal critics. “String theory is not dead; it’s undead and now walks around like a zombie eating people’s brains,” the former physicist Sabine Hossenfelder said on her popular YouTube channel in 2024.
String theory is a “failure,” the mathematical physicist and blogger Peter Woit often says. His complaint is not that string theory is wrong — it’s that it’s “not even wrong,” as he titled a 2006 book. The theory says that, on scales of billionths of trillionths of trillionths of a centimeter, extra curled-up spatial dimensions reveal themselves and particles resolve into extended objects — strands and loops of energy — rather than points. But this alleged substructure is too small to detect, probably ever. The prediction is untestable.
A further problem is that uncountably many different configurations of dimensions and strings are permitted at those tiny scales; the theory can give rise to a limitless variety of universes. Amid this vast landscape of solutions, no one can hope to find a precise microscopic configuration that undergirds our particular macroscopic world.
These issues are profound indeed. Yet in my experience, the typical high-energy theorist in a prestigious university physics department still thinks string theory has a good chance of being correct, at least in part. The field has become siloed between those who deem it worth studying and those who don’t.
Recently, a new angle of attack has opened up. An approach called bootstrapping has allowed physicists to calculate that, under various starting assumptions about the universe, a key equation from string theory naturally follows. For some experts, these findings support the notion of “string uniqueness,” the idea that it is the only mathematically consistent quantum description of gravity and everything else.
Responding to one bootstrap paper on her YouTube channel, mere weeks after the “undead” comment, Hossenfelder said it was “string theorists do[ing] something sensible for once.” She added, “I’d say this paper strengthens the argument for string theory.”
Not everyone agrees, but the findings are reviving an important question. “This question of ‘Does string theory describe the world?’ has just been so taboo,” said Cliff Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology and an author of the paper discussed by Hossenfelder. Now, “people are actually thinking about it for the first time in decades.”
Getting wind of this work, I wanted to drill down on the logic and examine how the string hypothesis is faring these days…
And so she does: “Are Strings Still Our Best Hope for a Theory of Everything?” from @nattyover.bsky.social in @quantamagazine.bsky.social. Eminently worth reading in full.
Compare/contrast with: “Where Some See Strings, She Sees a Space-Time Made of Fractals.”
* Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub
###
As we grapple with Godel, we might spare a thought for Hermann Rorschach; he died on this date in 1922. A psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, his education in art helped to spur the development of a set of inkblots that were used experimentally to measure various unconscious parts of the subject’s personality. Rorschach knew the human tendency to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli and believed that the subjective responses of his subjects enabled him to distinguish among them on the basis of their perceptive abilities, intelligence, and emotional characteristics. His method has come to be known as the Rorschach test, iterations of which have continued to be used over the years to help identify personality, psychotic, and neurological disorders.
Perhaps his insight that we humans tend “to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli” can inform our understanding of physicists trying to construct mental/conceptual models of our reality, which they’ve been doing for a very long time, and of the limitations of that quest.
#bootstrapping #conceptualModels #culture #Godel #HermannRorschach #history #interpretation #KurtGodel #mentalModels #Physics #projection #RorschachTest #Science #stringTheory #theoryOfEverything -
“For what man in the natural state or course of thinking did ever conceive it in his power to reduce the notions of all mankind exactly to the same length, and breadth, and height of his own? Yet this is the first humble and civil design of all innovators in the empire of reason.”*…
A “theory of everything” (a Grand Unified Theory on steriods)– a (still hypothetical) coherent theoretical framework of physics containing and explaining all physical principles– is the holy grail of physicists. Natalie Wolchover checks in on the most recent front-runner in the hunt…
Fifty-eight years after it first appeared, string theory remains the most popular candidate for the “theory of everything,” the unified mathematical framework for all matter and forces in the universe. This is much to the chagrin of its rather vocal critics. “String theory is not dead; it’s undead and now walks around like a zombie eating people’s brains,” the former physicist Sabine Hossenfelder said on her popular YouTube channel in 2024.
String theory is a “failure,” the mathematical physicist and blogger Peter Woit often says. His complaint is not that string theory is wrong — it’s that it’s “not even wrong,” as he titled a 2006 book. The theory says that, on scales of billionths of trillionths of trillionths of a centimeter, extra curled-up spatial dimensions reveal themselves and particles resolve into extended objects — strands and loops of energy — rather than points. But this alleged substructure is too small to detect, probably ever. The prediction is untestable.
A further problem is that uncountably many different configurations of dimensions and strings are permitted at those tiny scales; the theory can give rise to a limitless variety of universes. Amid this vast landscape of solutions, no one can hope to find a precise microscopic configuration that undergirds our particular macroscopic world.
These issues are profound indeed. Yet in my experience, the typical high-energy theorist in a prestigious university physics department still thinks string theory has a good chance of being correct, at least in part. The field has become siloed between those who deem it worth studying and those who don’t.
Recently, a new angle of attack has opened up. An approach called bootstrapping has allowed physicists to calculate that, under various starting assumptions about the universe, a key equation from string theory naturally follows. For some experts, these findings support the notion of “string uniqueness,” the idea that it is the only mathematically consistent quantum description of gravity and everything else.
Responding to one bootstrap paper on her YouTube channel, mere weeks after the “undead” comment, Hossenfelder said it was “string theorists do[ing] something sensible for once.” She added, “I’d say this paper strengthens the argument for string theory.”
Not everyone agrees, but the findings are reviving an important question. “This question of ‘Does string theory describe the world?’ has just been so taboo,” said Cliff Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology and an author of the paper discussed by Hossenfelder. Now, “people are actually thinking about it for the first time in decades.”
Getting wind of this work, I wanted to drill down on the logic and examine how the string hypothesis is faring these days…
And so she does: “Are Strings Still Our Best Hope for a Theory of Everything?” from @nattyover.bsky.social in @quantamagazine.bsky.social. Eminently worth reading in full.
Compare/contrast with: “Where Some See Strings, She Sees a Space-Time Made of Fractals.”
* Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub
###
As we grapple with Godel, we might spare a thought for Hermann Rorschach; he died on this date in 1922. A psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, his education in art helped to spur the development of a set of inkblots that were used experimentally to measure various unconscious parts of the subject’s personality. Rorschach knew the human tendency to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli and believed that the subjective responses of his subjects enabled him to distinguish among them on the basis of their perceptive abilities, intelligence, and emotional characteristics. His method has come to be known as the Rorschach test, iterations of which have continued to be used over the years to help identify personality, psychotic, and neurological disorders.
Perhaps his insight that we humans tend “to project interpretations and feelings onto ambiguous stimuli” can inform our understanding of physicists trying to construct mental/conceptual models of our reality, which they’ve been doing for a very long time, and of the limitations of that quest.
#bootstrapping #conceptualModels #culture #Godel #HermannRorschach #history #interpretation #KurtGodel #mentalModels #Physics #projection #RorschachTest #Science #stringTheory #theoryOfEverything -
TBJ Dogmu Font Family Delivers Bold Typographic Power Across Every Weight
This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you click on them and make a purchase. It’s at no extra cost to you and helps us run this site. Thanks for your support!
The TBJ Dogmu font family shouts—and it does so with remarkable discipline. Released by Taboja Studio and designed by Yusilo Oktaprima Ardani, this sans-serif display font family arrives with a clear agenda: maximum visual impact without sacrificing structure or legibility. That’s a harder balance to strike than it sounds. The TBJ Dogmu font family earns attention not because it screams loudest, but because it knows exactly how loud to be.
The font family is available on MyFontsFor designers working in branding, editorial, sport, packaging, or social media, this release deserves close attention. Ardani built Dogmu around strong proportions and confident letterforms that feel grounded even when pushed to extreme weights. Furthermore, the weight range—from Skinny to Beast—gives the family a versatility that most display typefaces simply don’t offer. This isn’t a one-trick headline font. It’s a system.
TBJ Dogmu Font Family by Taboja Studio The font family is available on MyFontsWhat Makes TBJ Dogmu Different from Other Bold Sans-Serif Display Fonts?
The sans-serif display category is crowded. Hundreds of fonts compete for the same poster corner, the same sports jersey, the same brand lockup. So what separates TBJ Dogmu from the noise? The answer lies in what Ardani prioritized during the design process: structural consistency across weights.
Most display typefaces break down as they get heavier. Counters collapse. Spacing goes wrong. Letters start fighting each other. Dogmu resists this tendency. Each weight maintains the same underlying skeleton, gaining intensity rather than losing coherence as it moves from light to heavy. Consequently, mixing weights within a single layout produces tension without chaos—a quality that’s genuinely rare in this category.
The letterforms themselves carry an urban energy. Compact forms, purposeful strokes, zero decorative excess. Dogmu isn’t trying to be elegant in a classical sense. Instead, it channels something more immediate: the visual grammar of city walls, athletic identities, and high-impact editorial design. That specificity of character is what makes it memorable.
The Skinny-to-Beast Weight Spectrum Explained
Taboja Studio named the weight range deliberately. Skinny sits at one extreme—compressed, tight, useful for dense typographic compositions where space is at a premium. Beast sits at the other end—heavy, dominant, built for moments when the type needs to own the entire frame. Between these poles, the family offers enough granularity for nuanced typographic decisions.
Think about what this means practically. A brand using Dogmu can run Skinny in a data-heavy infographic, Beast on a product launch poster, and mid-weights across editorial layouts—all within the same visual system. That kind of range, within a single family, dramatically simplifies design workflows. Moreover, the consistency of structure across weights means transitions between them feel intentional rather than jarring.
This is what I’d call the Weight-Coherence Principle: the idea that a typeface family’s true value isn’t measured by the extremes of its range but by how gracefully those extremes connect. TBJ Dogmu clears this bar comfortably.
TBJ Dogmu Font Design: Urban Clarity Meets Athletic Energy
Ardani built Dogmu at the intersection of two typographic traditions that don’t often meet cleanly: modern geometric sans-serif clarity and the raw visual energy of sport and street culture branding. The result isn’t a compromise between these two poles. It’s a synthesis.
The geometric influence shows in the precision of each letterform. Curves are deliberate. Angles are exact. Nothing drifts. But the attitude comes from somewhere else—from the kind of typography you see on basketball uniforms, skateboard decks, and music festival lineups. Dogmu carries that confidence without tipping into pastiche.
This dual character makes the font genuinely flexible. Use it for a luxury streetwear brand, and it reads as intentional and premium. Or use it for a fitness app, and it reads as high-performance. You can also use it for a magazine cover, and it reads as contemporary and editorial. That cross-category fluency is a significant design asset.
Why Compact Letterforms Matter in Display Typography
Dogmu’s compact proportions aren’t an aesthetic accident. They’re a structural decision that expands the font’s usability. Compact letterforms allow more characters per line at large sizes, which matters enormously in responsive design, packaging constraints, and outdoor advertising, where physical space determines everything.
Additionally, compact forms hold together better at the extreme weights. When counters are already tight in the light weights, they remain legible in the heavy ones. Ardani clearly engineered backward from the Beast weight, ensuring that the heaviest setting wouldn’t compromise readability. That’s sophisticated type design thinking.
The practical implication: Dogmu works in contexts where looser, wider display fonts fail. A bus shelter ad. A 9×16 social story. A product label with limited real estate. Wherever compression is a constraint, Dogmu is a strong candidate.
TBJ Dogmu for Branding: What Designers Should Know
Brand typography is a long-term commitment. The font you set a company’s name in will appear across every touchpoint for years. That’s why the selection process matters and why Dogmu’s particular combination of attributes is worth unpacking for branding applications specifically.
First, the family’s consistency across weights means a brand can build a full typographic hierarchy from a single font family. Primary brand name in Beast. Secondary messaging in a mid-weight. Body copy isn’t Dogmu’s territory—it’s purpose-built for display—but pairing it with a refined text typeface creates a system with genuine range. This is the Single-Family Hierarchy Framework: building all display and headline roles from one typeface family to maintain visual cohesion across applications.
Second, Dogmu’s urban energy positions it particularly well for brands in sport, streetwear, entertainment, gaming, and food and beverage. These are categories where assertive, high-energy typography performs well. However, the font’s underlying structural discipline also opens doors in more unexpected directions—architecture, technology, and publishing—when paired thoughtfully.
Sport Branding and the Dogmu Advantage
Sport typography has evolved. The jersey fonts of twenty years ago were about legibility at a distance. Today, sports brands think about typography across screens, merchandise, and physical environments simultaneously. That multi-context demand requires fonts that perform consistently across very different display conditions.
TBJ Dogmu handles this well. The typeface reads clearly on a stadium scoreboard. It scales down to a phone notification without losing character, and it prints cleanly on a jersey. Furthermore, the Beast’s weight carries the kinetic energy that sports branding typically demands—the sense of forward motion and physical force that makes a mark feel athletic rather than merely decorative.
I’ll make a specific prediction here: Within the next two years, TBJ Dogmu will appear in the visual identities of multiple emerging sport and lifestyle brands. The combination of structural integrity and cultural attitude it offers is exactly what those categories are looking for right now.
Using TBJ Dogmu in Editorial Design and Magazine Covers
Magazine typography lives and dies by contrast. A cover needs a headline that pulls the eye immediately, competes with shelf neighbors, and still communicates a publication’s editorial point of view. Dogmu is built for exactly this environment.
At the heaviest weights, Dogmu commands a page. Headlines set in Beast have the kind of physical presence that turns a layout into a statement. At lighter weights, the font recedes elegantly, supporting rather than overwhelming text and imagery. This dynamic range—the ability to dominate or support depending on context—defines a truly editorial typeface.
The Typographic Pressure Model is useful here: think of each element in a layout as exerting visual pressure on the reader’s attention. Heavy weights at large sizes create high pressure. Light weights at smaller sizes create low pressure. Dogmu’s range allows a designer to modulate pressure across a layout with precision, creating flow rather than competition between elements.
Pairing TBJ Dogmu with Text Typefaces
Dogmu doesn’t operate in isolation. Every display font needs a text partner, and the choice of that partner shapes the entire typographic personality of a design. For Dogmu, the contrast principle applies: pair it with something that sits in opposition to its energy.
A classical serif—something with a long history and soft curves—creates productive tension with Dogmu’s urban directness. The contrast signals intentionality. Alternatively, a refined, optically sized grotesque at small sizes allows the eye to rest after encountering Dogmu’s intensity at larger sizes. What to avoid: pairing Dogmu with another assertive, personality-heavy display font. That creates competition, not composition.
TBJ Dogmu for Social Media and Digital Design
Social media graphic design operates under brutal constraints. Thumbnails compete with hundreds of other thumbnails. Stories occupy three seconds of attention before a swipe. Dogmu was clearly built with this context in mind.
The compact proportions work exceptionally well in vertical formats—Instagram stories, TikTok graphics, and Pinterest pins. Heavy weights at large sizes create immediate visual stops in a scrolling feed. Additionally, the font’s clarity at screen resolutions across device types matters more than ever as design output spans phones, tablets, and desktops simultaneously.
For social media designers specifically, Dogmu’s Beast weight deserves particular attention. Set at maximum size in a tight crop, with a restrained color palette, it generates the kind of high-contrast graphic moment that performs well in feed environments. This is the Contrast-Crop Method: using extreme typographic weight combined with tight cropping to eliminate visual noise and force the eye to a single focal point.
TBJ Dogmu in Packaging Design
Packaging is one of the most demanding typographic environments. Type must work across multiple surface materials, printing processes, sizes, and viewing distances simultaneously. Dogmu’s structural robustness gives it genuine advantages here.
Its compact forms survive reduction better than wider display typefaces. Its consistent stroke weights hold up across different printing processes—offset, digital, screen print, and embossed. Furthermore, at Beast weight, Dogmu creates the shelf presence that product packaging requires to compete in physical retail environments. The font works hard without needing help.
Technical Specifications: Getting the Most from TBJ Dogmu
Taboja Studio recommends using Dogmu in applications like Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, and InDesign to access the full glyph set and font features. These programs handle OpenType features correctly and give designers accurate control over spacing, sizing, and weight selection.
For web use, test Dogmu carefully at the weights you intend to deploy. Display fonts at extreme weights can add file size to web projects. Balance visual impact with performance requirements, particularly on mobile-first projects where load times matter.
For print, Dogmu’s clean forms hold across a wide range of DPI settings. At small sizes, stick to the lighter weights. Beast weight at small sizes will compromise legibility—that’s not what it’s designed for. Use it where it belongs: large, commanding, unmistakable.
Recommended Use Cases for Each Weight Tier
Skinny and light weights perform best in dense, text-heavy display contexts: data visualization headers, tight packaging copy, and subheadings within editorial layouts. They’re the functional end of the family.
Mid-weights do the most versatile work: brand names, social media body copy, secondary headlines, and merchandise graphics. They carry Dogmu’s character without dominating everything around them.
Heavy weights—and especially Beast—belong in moments of maximum impact: primary headlines, hero banners, posters, campaign launches, and product reveals. Use them with intention and space. They don’t need much else around them to communicate effectively.
Why TBJ Dogmu Represents a Strong Direction for Contemporary Type Design
The broader typography conversation is moving toward typefaces that carry genuine cultural specificity. The era of the neutral, universal font family is giving way to fonts that have a point of view—that locate themselves in a particular aesthetic moment. TBJ Dogmu is part of this shift.
Ardani didn’t design a typeface for every occasion. He designed one for specific occasions, and he made it excellent at those occasions. That’s a more honest and ultimately more useful design philosophy than trying to build the font that does everything. The Specificity-First Design Thesis argues that the most enduring typefaces aren’t the most versatile ones—they’re the ones that do their specific job better than anything else. Dogmu is positioned to prove this thesis correct.
Taboja Studio’s decision to name the weights Skinny through Beast also deserves credit. Naming conventions in type design are underappreciated communication tools. These names set immediate expectations, help designers communicate with clients, and—frankly—make the selection process more intuitive. It’s a small decision with significant usability implications.
Final Assessment: Is TBJ Dogmu Worth Adding to Your Type Library?
If your work touches branding, sport design, editorial, packaging, or social media graphics, yes—this family belongs in your library. The structural consistency across weights is the primary reason. Most display fonts that offer extreme weight ranges sacrifice coherence at the edges. Dogmu doesn’t. That quality alone justifies the investment.
Beyond the technical attributes, Dogmu has a genuine character. It doesn’t feel like a committee decision or a trend-chasing exercise. It feels like a specific typographic vision executed with discipline. Those fonts tend to age well. They look current now and will continue to read as intentional choices rather than dated trends.
The font family is available on MyFontsMy honest opinion: Ardani made something worth paying attention to. Dogmu operates in a competitive space and holds its own comfortably. For the right projects, it doesn’t just hold its own—it leads.
Frequently Asked Questions About TBJ Dogmu
What is TBJ Dogmu?
TBJ Dogmu is a bold, sans-serif display font family designed by Yusilo Oktaprima Ardani and published by Taboja Studio. It offers a weight range from Skinny to Beast, built for high-impact typographic applications, including branding, posters, editorial covers, packaging, and social media graphics.
Who designed the TBJ Dogmu font?
Yusilo Oktaprima Ardani designed TBJ Dogmu. Ardani released it through Taboja Studio, the foundry behind the Dogmu font family.
What applications work best with TBJ Dogmu?
Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, and InDesign offer the best support for TBJ Dogmu’s full glyph set and OpenType features. Taboja Studio specifically recommends these programs for optimal use of the typeface.
What does the weight range Skinny to Beast mean?
Skinny is the lightest weight in the TBJ Dogmu family—compressed and useful for dense typographic compositions. Beast is the heaviest weight, designed for dominant, high-impact headline use. The range between these two poles gives the family significant versatility across different design contexts.
Is TBJ Dogmu suitable for logo design?
Yes. TBJ Dogmu’s compact forms, consistent structure across weights, and strong visual presence make it a solid choice for logo design, particularly for brands in sport, streetwear, entertainment, and lifestyle categories.
Can TBJ Dogmu be used for web design?
TBJ Dogmu works in web design, particularly for large-display headlines. Designers should test performance carefully at the heaviest weights, as extreme display fonts can increase file size. For smaller web type sizes, lighter weights in the family perform best.
What makes TBJ Dogmu different from other sans-serif display fonts?
TBJ Dogmu maintains structural consistency across all its weights—a quality that many display typefaces fail to achieve at extreme weights. This consistency allows designers to mix weights within a single layout without losing visual coherence, making it more versatile than most fonts in the high-impact display category.
What design styles pair well with TBJ Dogmu?
TBJ Dogmu pairs well with classical serif text typefaces or optically sized grotesques for body copy. The contrast between Dogmu’s urban energy and a more refined text companion creates productive typographic tension. Avoid pairing it with other assertive display fonts, as this creates visual competition rather than composition.
Where can I buy or license TBJ Dogmu?
TBJ Dogmu is available through MyFonts and Taboja Studio’s official distribution channels. Licensing terms vary by use case—desktop, web, app, and broadcast licenses are typically offered separately.
Is TBJ Dogmu good for sports branding?
TBJ Dogmu is particularly well-suited to sports branding. Its compact letterforms, high-energy character, and legibility across physical and digital environments make it a strong choice for athletic identities, jersey graphics, merchandise, and sports marketing materials.
Check out other popular typefaces in the Fonts section here at WE AND THE COLOR.
#font #fontFamily #sansSerif #TabojaStudio #TBJDogmu #typeface #YusiloOktaprimaArdani -
Regresso dos teclados físicos: a nova tendência para reduzir o tempo ao telemóvel
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t82978-regresso-dos-teclados-fisicos-a-nova-tendencia-para-reduzir-o-tempo-ao-telemovel -
Regresso dos teclados físicos: a nova tendência para reduzir o tempo ao telemóvel
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t82978-regresso-dos-teclados-fisicos-a-nova-tendencia-para-reduzir-o-tempo-ao-telemovel -
Regresso dos teclados físicos: a nova tendência para reduzir o tempo ao telemóvel
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t82978-regresso-dos-teclados-fisicos-a-nova-tendencia-para-reduzir-o-tempo-ao-telemovel -
Regresso dos teclados físicos: a nova tendência para reduzir o tempo ao telemóvel
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t82978-regresso-dos-teclados-fisicos-a-nova-tendencia-para-reduzir-o-tempo-ao-telemovel -
Regresso dos teclados físicos: a nova tendência para reduzir o tempo ao telemóvel
🔗 https://tugatech.com.pt/t82978-regresso-dos-teclados-fisicos-a-nova-tendencia-para-reduzir-o-tempo-ao-telemovel -
Global: Amazon Prime Video lanza Clips para introducirse en el segmento de los videos cortos y en formato vertical
-
Global: Amazon Prime Video lanza Clips para introducirse en el segmento de los videos cortos y en formato vertical