home.social

#unsc — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #unsc, aggregated by home.social.

  1. theguardian.com/world/2026/jul. The #Israeli #Government think they can carry on doing this in violation of the 4th #Geneva #Convention & #UNSC Resolution 242 because no-one is going to stop them, & because there'll be no #punishment for any of them - & they are right! International #law? WHAT #international law?

  2. theguardian.com/world/2026/jul. The #Israeli #Government think they can carry on doing this in violation of the 4th #Geneva #Convention & #UNSC Resolution 242 because no-one is going to stop them, & because there'll be no #punishment for any of them - & they are right! International #law? WHAT #international law?

  3. An explosion 81 years ago created 5 power passes still in use today

    81 years ago, a desert explosion quietly shaped who holds veto power at the UN today.

    #history #trinitytest #unsc

  4. An explosion 81 years ago created 5 power passes still in use today

    81 years ago, a desert explosion quietly shaped who holds veto power at the UN today.

    #history #trinitytest #unsc

  5. From the article: "Israel rejects allegations it carried out a genocide in Gaza or that it institutes an apartheid regime in the West Bank, which has a population of about 3 million Palestinians and around 500,000 Jewish settlers."

    #IsraeLies * -- and needs to be BROUGHT TO JUSTICE, not just defunded. Cutting off aid might have sufficed when they were 'just' an #apartheid state committing #EthnicCleansing, but their #CrimesAgainstHumanity and #genocide targeting Gaza's civilian population--after Hamas' operation against IDF & police garrisons along the border (augmented by ITS OWN deliberate terrorist atrocities) exposed the futility of their decades-long strategy of securitization, at insulating the Israeli population from Palestinian resistance to occupation and illegal theft of their land--require a stronger response.

    Had it been ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, we would have demanded #UNSC action and regime change by now (and more than likely just DONE IT OURSELVES if we didn't get it).

    * When SOUTH AFRICA declares you an apartheid state (not JUST in the West Bank, btw, but also in Israel itself), and THE WORLD'S FOREMOST GENOCIDE SCHOLARS (many for obvious reasons THEMSEVES JEWISH!) confirm you're committing genocide, it's pretty clear you're an apartheid state committing genocide, and not just the victim of more antisemitism.

    reuters.com/world/us/us-democr

  6. From the article: "Israel rejects allegations it carried out a genocide in Gaza or that it institutes an apartheid regime in the West Bank, which has a population of about 3 million Palestinians and around 500,000 Jewish settlers."

    #IsraeLies * -- and needs to be BROUGHT TO JUSTICE, not just defunded. Cutting off aid might have sufficed when they were 'just' an #apartheid state committing #EthnicCleansing, but their #CrimesAgainstHumanity and #genocide targeting Gaza's civilian population--after Hamas' operation against IDF & police garrisons along the border (augmented by ITS OWN deliberate terrorist atrocities) exposed the futility of their decades-long strategy of securitization, at insulating the Israeli population from Palestinian resistance to occupation and illegal theft of their land--require a stronger response.

    Had it been ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, we would have demanded #UNSC action and regime change by now (and more than likely just DONE IT OURSELVES if we didn't get it).

    * When SOUTH AFRICA declares you an apartheid state (not JUST in the West Bank, btw, but also in Israel itself), and THE WORLD'S FOREMOST GENOCIDE SCHOLARS (many for obvious reasons THEMSEVES JEWISH!) confirm you're committing genocide, it's pretty clear you're an apartheid state committing genocide, and not just the victim of more antisemitism.

    reuters.com/world/us/us-democr

  7. « … China delivered one of its strongest stances yet on Palestine, insisting that "there can be no resolution to the Palestinian struggle without the establishment of a Palestinian state"… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=AUZ1TWNkKLE

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇨🇳 🇺🇳

  8. « … China delivered one of its strongest stances yet on Palestine, insisting that "there can be no resolution to the Palestinian struggle without the establishment of a Palestinian state"… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=AUZ1TWNkKLE

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇨🇳 🇺🇳

  9. Jury Equity, Contempt Of Court & Lawfare! When Protest Meets the Courtroom; Re Rajiv Menon KC and the Limits of Defence Advocacy!

    A contempt referral in a protest trial shows how firmly the courts now police advocacy, jury messaging, and courtroom protest.

    Editor’s note: This post is written from both an activist and legal-analytic perspective, but it stays anchored to the judgment and later appellate reporting. The point is not to soften the ruling’s force, but to state it accurately.

    Alongside the political headline of prime minister Keir Starmer announcing his resignation yesterday, on 22 June 2026 Mr Justice Johnson found that there is a case to answer for contempt arising from Rajiv Menon KC’s closing speech in the “Filton Six” proceedings and referred the matter onward for consideration of whether formal contempt proceedings should be brought.1 That is a serious step. It means the court considered there was enough to move beyond complaint and into possible contempt action, though not yet a final finding of guilt.2 3

    The judgment matters because it does not treat the issue as a technical slip. It records that Mr Menon was held to have informed the jury of “jury equity”, invited them to apply it, repeatedly told them the judge could not direct a conviction, and pushed the jury toward Gaza- and Elbit-related material the judge had already ruled inadmissible.3 4 The court’s analysis is that such conduct may amount to deliberate defiance of express rulings, creating a real risk of impeding the administration of justice.5 6 7

    That is the legal import, and it should not be softened. The judgment says the speech may have subverted the jury’s role and forced the judge to give further directions to stabilise the trial process.11 12 In plain terms, the court is warning that advocacy can cross the line from forceful defence into contempt if it knowingly ignores rulings the jury has been told to follow.

    For activists, the lesson is blunt. The courtroom is not a protest stage, and a political cause does not give counsel a licence to reintroduce excluded arguments through closing speech.11 12 If a judge bars contextual evidence or limits the route to verdict, the lawful response is to challenge that ruling by proper procedure, preserve objections, and build an appealable record — not to bypass the ruling by appealing directly to conscience.

    The judgment also sharpens the warning around “jury equity” tactics. The court had already prohibited counsel from inviting the jury to disregard legal directions, juror oaths, or the court’s route to verdict, and had expressly forbidden informing the jury of the principle described as jury equity.10 That means the old instinct to invoke jury conscience can now trigger contempt risk where the judge has clearly marked the boundary.

    None of this removes the court’s obligation to weigh fairness, freedom of expression, and the role of defence counsel. The judgment expressly recognises the pressure on advocates and the chilling effect contempt proceedings can have.28 29 30 But that recognition does not neutralise conduct the court considers deliberate non-compliance. The court’s position is that activist defence must still remain lawful advocacy.

    The institutional message is sharper still. The court says it must be able to enforce its directions, particularly where further trials are pending and the same issues may recur.32 That makes this judgment about more than one barrister. It is about how the courts will manage protest trials, how tightly they will police advocacy, and how far they will go to stop criminal proceedings becoming a vehicle for importing excluded political argument into the jury box.8 17

    Later reporting on the appeal confirms that the central dispute was also procedural jurisdiction, including who should properly have been asked to act first on any contempt referral.14 21 That does not erase the underlying warning: it means the route to contempt matters as much as the allegation itself.

    The key lesson is simple: if you want to fight the law, do it by challenging the law, not by disobeying the judge’s rulings in front of the jury. Once a court has ruled a line off-limits, turning that line into the centrepiece of your closing speech may look, to the court, less like fearless advocacy and more like contempt.

    What activists should note

    • If a judge excludes contextual material, challenge it procedurally and preserve the point for appeal.
    • Do not use closing speeches to smuggle back in arguments the court has ruled off-limits.
    • Do not invite the jury to apply “jury equity” or conscience-based nullification where the judge has prohibited it.
    • Keep political messaging separate from courtroom advocacy.
    • Remember that contempt risk can arise even where the courtroom strategy is framed as fearless or morally urgent.

    Transcript extracts and findings

    Transcript excerptJuSTICE JOHNSON’s findingLines 3–14; 32–59Invited the jury to put aside judicial directions and consider Middle East context; this contradicted pre-trial rulings that such material was inadmissible.9Lines 118–146Suggested the prosecution had accepted defence evidence on excluded points; the judge found this misleading and incompatible with prior rulings.4Lines 166–172Gave an inaccurate account of the court’s answer to a jury question; the judge found the account incompatible with the ruling actually given.4 15Lines 213–245; 239–240; 244–245; 308–309On six occasions told the jury a judge could not direct a conviction; the judge held repetition of this point was an invitation to disregard the legal route to verdict.4 10Lines 246–280; 281–289Informed the jury of “jury equity” and invited them to apply it; the judge had previously directed counsel not to inform the jury of, or invite them to apply, jury equity.3 10 15Lines 68–108; 148–152Suggested the court was protecting Elbit Systems; the judge found this may have been an improper suggestion of partiality amounting to contempt if proved.4 20

    Footnotes

    1. Re Rajiv Menon KC, Approved Judgment, Mr Justice Johnson, Royal Courts of Justice, 22 June 2026, para 1. ↩ Link to actual judgment here.
    2. Ibid., paras 2–4. ↩
    3. Ibid., paras 3(10) and 4(1)–(2). ↩
    4. Ibid., paras 4(1)–(7), 18–20, 24–26. ↩
    5. Ibid., paras 17–19. ↩
    6. Ibid., paras 18–19. ↩
    7. Ibid., paras 24–26. ↩
    8. Ibid., paras 33–36. ↩
    9. Ibid., paras 3(2)–(6), 4(4), 18–19. ↩
    10. Ibid., para 3(10) and paras 4(1)–(2), 4(1), 10. ↩
    11. Ibid., paras 32–36. ↩
    12. Ibid., paras 28–31. ↩
    13. Ibid., paras 1, 34–36. ↩
    14. Later reporting on the appellate history confirms the jurisdictional dispute and the route through the Attorney General or other proper authority. ↩
    15. Ibid., transcript lines 246–289, Appendix 1. ↩
    16. Nikula v Finland (2004) 38 EHRR 45, para 49. Open authority. ↩
    17. Ibid., paras 33–36. ↩
    18. Ibid., paras 22–25. ↩
    19. Ibid., paras 18–19, 24–26. ↩
    20. Ibid., para 20. ↩
    21. Ibid., para 9. ↩
    22. Ibid., para 19. ↩
    23. Ibid., para 19. ↩
    24. Ibid., paras 22–23. ↩
    25. Ibid., para 24. ↩
    26. Ibid., para 25. ↩
    27. Ibid., para 27. ↩
    28. Ibid., para 28. ↩
    29. Ibid., para 29. ↩
    30. Ibid., para 31. ↩
    31. Ibid., para 31. ↩
    32. Ibid., paras 32–36. ↩
    #complicity #directAction #freedom #genocide #History #ICC #ICJ #impunity #Ireland #justice #lawfare #liberation #news #Palestine #undueInfluence #unga #unsc #warCrimes #warfare #welfare #Zionism
  10. Jury Equity, Contempt Of Court & Lawfare! When Protest Meets the Courtroom; Re Rajiv Menon KC and the Limits of Defence Advocacy!

    A contempt referral in a protest trial shows how firmly the courts now police advocacy, jury messaging, and courtroom protest.

    Editor’s note: This post is written from both an activist and legal-analytic perspective, but it stays anchored to the judgment and later appellate reporting. The point is not to soften the ruling’s force, but to state it accurately.

    Alongside the political headline of prime minister Keir Starmer announcing his resignation, on 22 June 2026 Mr Justice Johnson found that there is a case to answer for contempt arising from Rajiv Menon KC’s closing speech in the “Filton Six” proceedings and referred the matter onward for consideration of whether formal contempt proceedings should be brought.1 That is a serious step. It means the court considered there was enough to move beyond complaint and into possible contempt action, though not yet a final finding of guilt.2 3

    The judgment matters because it does not treat the issue as a technical slip. It records that Mr Menon was held to have informed the jury of “jury equity”, invited them to apply it, repeatedly told them the judge could not direct a conviction, and pushed the jury toward Gaza- and Elbit-related material the judge had already ruled inadmissible.3 4 The court’s analysis is that such conduct may amount to deliberate defiance of express rulings, creating a real risk of impeding the administration of justice.5 6 7

    That is the legal import, and it should not be softened. The judgment says the speech may have subverted the jury’s role and forced the judge to give further directions to stabilise the trial process.11 12 In plain terms, the court is warning that advocacy can cross the line from forceful defence into contempt if it knowingly ignores rulings the jury has been told to follow.

    For activists, the lesson is blunt. The courtroom is not a protest stage, and a political cause does not give counsel a licence to reintroduce excluded arguments through closing speech.11 12 If a judge bars contextual evidence or limits the route to verdict, the lawful response is to challenge that ruling by proper procedure, preserve objections, and build an appealable record — not to bypass the ruling by appealing directly to conscience.

    The judgment also sharpens the warning around “jury equity” tactics. The court had already prohibited counsel from inviting the jury to disregard legal directions, juror oaths, or the court’s route to verdict, and had expressly forbidden informing the jury of the principle described as jury equity.10 That means the old instinct to invoke jury conscience can now trigger contempt risk where the judge has clearly marked the boundary.

    None of this removes the court’s obligation to weigh fairness, freedom of expression, and the role of defence counsel. The judgment expressly recognises the pressure on advocates and the chilling effect contempt proceedings can have.28 29 30 But that recognition does not neutralise conduct the court considers deliberate non-compliance. The court’s position is that activist defence must still remain lawful advocacy.

    The institutional message is sharper still. The court says it must be able to enforce its directions, particularly where further trials are pending and the same issues may recur.32 That makes this judgment about more than one barrister. It is about how the courts will manage protest trials, how tightly they will police advocacy, and how far they will go to stop criminal proceedings becoming a vehicle for importing excluded political argument into the jury box.8 17

    Later reporting on the appeal confirms that the central dispute was also procedural jurisdiction, including who should properly have been asked to act first on any contempt referral.14 21 That does not erase the underlying warning: it means the route to contempt matters as much as the allegation itself.

    The key lesson is simple: if you want to fight the law, do it by challenging the law, not by disobeying the judge’s rulings in front of the jury. Once a court has ruled a line off-limits, turning that line into the centrepiece of your closing speech may look, to the court, less like fearless advocacy and more like contempt.

    What activists should note

    • If a judge excludes contextual material, challenge it procedurally and preserve the point for appeal.
    • Do not use closing speeches to smuggle back in arguments the court has ruled off-limits.
    • Do not invite the jury to apply “jury equity” or conscience-based nullification where the judge has prohibited it.
    • Keep political messaging separate from courtroom advocacy.
    • Remember that contempt risk can arise even where the courtroom strategy is framed as fearless or morally urgent.

    Transcript extracts and findings

    Transcript excerptJudge’s findingLines 3–14; 32–59Invited the jury to put aside judicial directions and consider Middle East context; this contradicted pre-trial rulings that such material was inadmissible.9Lines 118–146Suggested the prosecution had accepted defence evidence on excluded points; the judge found this misleading and incompatible with prior rulings.4Lines 166–172Gave an inaccurate account of the court’s answer to a jury question; the judge found the account incompatible with the ruling actually given.4 15Lines 213–245; 239–240; 244–245; 308–309On six occasions told the jury a judge could not direct a conviction; the judge held repetition of this point was an invitation to disregard the legal route to verdict.4 10Lines 246–280; 281–289Informed the jury of “jury equity” and invited them to apply it; the judge had previously directed counsel not to inform the jury of, or invite them to apply, jury equity.3 10 15Lines 68–108; 148–152Suggested the court was protecting Elbit Systems; the judge found this may have been an improper suggestion of partiality amounting to contempt if proved.4 20

    Footnotes

    1. Re Rajiv Menon KC, Approved Judgment, Mr Justice Johnson, Royal Courts of Justice, 22 June 2026, para 1. ↩
    2. Ibid., paras 2–4. ↩
    3. Ibid., paras 3(10) and 4(1)–(2). ↩
    4. Ibid., paras 4(1)–(7), 18–20, 24–26. ↩
    5. Ibid., paras 17–19. ↩
    6. Ibid., paras 18–19. ↩
    7. Ibid., paras 24–26. ↩
    8. Ibid., paras 33–36. ↩
    9. Ibid., paras 3(2)–(6), 4(4), 18–19. ↩
    10. Ibid., para 3(10) and paras 4(1)–(2), 4(1), 10. ↩
    11. Ibid., paras 32–36. ↩
    12. Ibid., paras 28–31. ↩
    13. Ibid., paras 1, 34–36. ↩
    14. Later reporting on the appellate history confirms the jurisdictional dispute and the route through the Attorney General or other proper authority. ↩
    15. Ibid., transcript lines 246–289, Appendix 1. ↩
    16. Nikula v Finland (2004) 38 EHRR 45, para 49. Open authority. ↩
    17. Ibid., paras 33–36. ↩
    18. Ibid., paras 22–25. ↩
    19. Ibid., paras 18–19, 24–26. ↩
    20. Ibid., para 20. ↩
    21. Ibid., para 9. ↩
    22. Ibid., para 19. ↩
    23. Ibid., para 19. ↩
    24. Ibid., paras 22–23. ↩
    25. Ibid., para 24. ↩
    26. Ibid., para 25. ↩
    27. Ibid., para 27. ↩
    28. Ibid., para 28. ↩
    29. Ibid., para 29. ↩
    30. Ibid., para 31. ↩
    31. Ibid., para 31. ↩
    32. Ibid., paras 32–36. ↩
    #complicity #directAction #freedom #genocide #History #ICC #ICJ #impunity #Ireland #justice #lawfare #liberation #news #Palestine #undueInfluence #unga #unsc #warCrimes #warfare #welfare #Zionism
  11. RT by @EU_UNGeneva: Kremlin’s war has lasted longer than WWI. Russia doesn’t care that all #UNSC members call for an end. Doesn’t care that it’s killing 🇺🇦 civilians & even ~1000 Russian soldiers a day. It just keeps bombing. Enough is enough. Time for a ceasefire is now.➡️eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-
    ---
    nitter.net/EUatUN/status/20691

  12. Kremlin’s war has lasted longer than WWI. Russia doesn’t care that all #UNSC members call for an end. Doesn’t care that it’s killing 🇺🇦 civilians & even ~1000 Russian soldiers a day. It just keeps bombing. Enough is enough. Time for a ceasefire is now.➡️eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-
    ---
    nitter.net/EUatUN/status/20691

  13. « … Gaza is being held together by humanitarian workarounds and Palestinian perseverance… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=M1Z7UPd3eLM

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC #OCHA 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳

  14. « … Gaza is being held together by humanitarian workarounds and Palestinian perseverance… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=M1Z7UPd3eLM

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC #OCHA 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳

  15. « … said that the people of the Gaza Strip deserve to regain their "dignity" and not merely to survive on the bare minimum… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=cXuQIjnX2YY

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC #OCHA 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳

  16. « … said that the people of the Gaza Strip deserve to regain their "dignity" and not merely to survive on the bare minimum… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=cXuQIjnX2YY

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC #OCHA 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳

  17. #israel #palestine #gaza #genocide #truce #humanitariancrisis #unsc #uno

    2/2

    … provide immediate humanitarian help to a population that can ill afford to wait.“

    See also:

    „Gaza in the spotlight as dire conditions continue“
    news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1

  18. #israel #palestine #gaza #genocide #truce #humanitariancrisis #unsc #uno

    2/2

    … provide immediate humanitarian help to a population that can ill afford to wait.“

    See also:

    „Gaza in the spotlight as dire conditions continue“
    news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1

  19. #israel #palestine : #gaza / #genocide / #truce / #humanitariancrisis / #unsc / #uno

    „Despite Ceasefire Gains, Gazans Trapped in Humanitarian Nightmare, Briefers Warn, as Security Council Speakers Demand Unhindered Aid Access, Respect for Peace Plan

    While a limited ceasefire has improved life in Gaza somewhat, millions of its residents still face tremendous daily difficulties, the Security Council heard today, as speakers underscored the need to …

    press.un.org/en/2026/sc16390.d

    1/2

  20. #israel #palestine : #gaza / #genocide / #truce / #humanitariancrisis / #unsc / #uno

    „Despite Ceasefire Gains, Gazans Trapped in Humanitarian Nightmare, Briefers Warn, as Security Council Speakers Demand Unhindered Aid Access, Respect for Peace Plan

    While a limited ceasefire has improved life in Gaza somewhat, millions of its residents still face tremendous daily difficulties, the Security Council heard today, as speakers underscored the need to …

    press.un.org/en/2026/sc16390.d

    1/2

  21. youtu.be/dlLb9CYa2gc
    ⚠️🇰🇵Have Trump and Republicans left South Korea, Japan, and the Asian region in the cold? North Korea is being allowed to rise into a regional military superpower with revenge geared towards the USA (Kyiv Independent VIDEO) #Ukraine #Press #UnitedNations #Seoul #Busan #Incheon #Daegu #SouthKorea #Korea #USA #UNSC #NATO #Japan #Tokyo #US #America #America #Brussels #CoE #PACE #Media #News #Headlines #russiaUkraineWar
    #12yrInvasionOfUkraine #RussiansAreBabyKillers

  22. youtu.be/dlLb9CYa2gc
    ⚠️🇰🇵Have Trump and Republicans left South Korea, Japan, and the Asian region in the cold? North Korea is being allowed to rise into a regional military superpower with revenge geared towards the USA (Kyiv Independent VIDEO) #Ukraine #Press #UnitedNations #Seoul #Busan #Incheon #Daegu #SouthKorea #Korea #USA #UNSC #NATO #Japan #Tokyo #US #America #America #Brussels #CoE #PACE #Media #News #Headlines #russiaUkraineWar
    #12yrInvasionOfUkraine #RussiansAreBabyKillers

  23. youtu.be/N7T-s2_YvUA
    ⚡️🇬🇧Ukraine: The Latest | Russian terrorists put two more collaborative nations onto UN-Security Council, again proving UN needs dissolution, defunding as it becomes a propaganda outlet for Putin (The Telegraph VIDEO) #Ukraine #WarCrime #Press #Brussels #Media #ICC #London #UK #Hague #PACE #UK #OSCE #CoE #News #UN #US #Zimbabwean #Kyrgyzstan #UNSC #Headlines #russiaUkraineWar
    #12yrInvasionOfUkraine #RussiansAreBabyKillers

  24. youtu.be/N7T-s2_YvUA
    ⚡️🇬🇧Ukraine: The Latest | Russian terrorists put two more collaborative nations onto UN-Security Council, again proving UN needs dissolution, defunding as it becomes a propaganda outlet for Putin (The Telegraph VIDEO) #Ukraine #WarCrime #Press #Brussels #Media #ICC #London #UK #Hague #PACE #UK #OSCE #CoE #News #UN #US #Zimbabwean #Kyrgyzstan #UNSC #Headlines #russiaUkraineWar
    #12yrInvasionOfUkraine #RussiansAreBabyKillers

  25. 📢 Erstmals scheiterte Deutschland bei einer Kandidatur für den UN-Sicherheitsrat. Frederik Schissler argumentiert auf #PRIFblog: Diese Niederlage offenbart eine Dissonanz zwischen dem deutschen Selbstbild und wie Deutschlands Außenpolitik wirklich in der Welt wahrgenommen wird.

    ➡️ Jetzt lesen: blog.prif.org/2026/06/08/zwisc

    #UNSC #UNGA80 #Außenpolitik #Deutschland

  26. 📢 Erstmals scheiterte Deutschland bei einer Kandidatur für den UN-Sicherheitsrat. Frederik Schissler argumentiert auf #PRIFblog: Diese Niederlage offenbart eine Dissonanz zwischen dem deutschen Selbstbild und wie Deutschlands Außenpolitik wirklich in der Welt wahrgenommen wird.

    ➡️ Jetzt lesen: blog.prif.org/2026/06/08/zwisc

    #UNSC #UNGA80 #Außenpolitik #Deutschland

  27. « … Germany's foreign policy towards Israel and its support of the Israeli government during the war in Gaza has been quite contested… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=GlfHGDH9Q1E

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳 🇩🇪

  28. « … Germany's foreign policy towards Israel and its support of the Israeli government during the war in Gaza has been quite contested… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=GlfHGDH9Q1E

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳 🇩🇪

  29. #Germany lost a vote past Wednesday for a temporary seat on the United Nations Security Council #UNSC

    Something tells me, and reassures me, that their foreign policy, with its shameless support and cheerleading for the genocide in #Gaza, the silence on the Israeli occupation, and the selective application of #internationallaw when it comes to #Iran, will ensure that other countries do not simply let them get away with it..even as 2nd biggest financial #UN contributor.

    dw.com/en/un-security-council-

  30. #Germany lost a vote past Wednesday for a temporary seat on the United Nations Security Council #UNSC

    Something tells me, and reassures me, that their foreign policy, with its shameless support and cheerleading for the genocide in #Gaza, the silence on the Israeli occupation, and the selective application of #internationallaw when it comes to #Iran, will ensure that other countries do not simply let them get away with it..even as 2nd biggest financial #UN contributor.

    dw.com/en/un-security-council-

  31. « … for the first time, Germany has failed to win a non-permanent seat on the UNSC… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=vkb-SV_Fie8

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳 🇩🇪

  32. « … for the first time, Germany has failed to win a non-permanent seat on the UNSC… »⁣⁣⁣

    🔗 · youtube.com/watch?v=vkb-SV_Fie8

    #Palestine #ceasefire #FreePalestine #UNSC 

    @[email protected]⁣⁣
    @[email protected]
    @[email protected]

    🕊️ 🇵🇸 🍉 🙏🏻 ✌️ ☮️ 🇺🇳 🇩🇪

  33. #israel #lebanon : #conflict / #uno / #unsc / #peacekeeping / #proposals

    „All of the options presented to the U.N. Security Council by Secretary-General Antonio Guterres would continue U.N. military monitoring of the boundary between Israel and Lebanon, support Lebanese forces in deploying throughout the country and strengthen political efforts to end the fighting, which has persisted despite a nominal ceasefire.“
    mainichi.jp/english/articles/2

  34. INDIA LAYS GENOCIDE CHARGES AGAINST PAKISTAN AT UNSC

    India tells the UN Security Council Pakistan has a history of genocidal acts. This raises tensions between the two countries.

    #IndiaPakistan, #UNSC, #Genocide, #Kashmir, #Diplomacy

    newsletter.tf/india-accuses-pa