home.social

#gunownership — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #gunownership, aggregated by home.social.

  1. I have to say (because Tom McIlroy’s article is not a well written opinion piece — perhaps due to space limitations, still…) I am supportive of strict #GunLaws but even more so on the ability of the #Police to enforce them.

    Taking a helicopter view, what is urgently required is $$$ to fund both a #NationalBuyBack and sufficiently staffed #FirearmsRegistries to enable better control and oversight of #GunOwnership. Anything else is fiddling on the margins and largely political in intent. BTW, in so far as a national registry is concerned, Tom is happy to leave it at ‘speedier progress’ is being made. It’s been progresing since #PortArthur mate. Do you think you could mention that? Apparently, according to Tom, ‘Smart public service minds’ have been totally incompetent and unable to find the right Consultancy to get it done. My take? It’s about #Power, #Control and $$$$ throughout the federation govts.

    To be clear, Gun Laws in Australia are up to the job, especially if periodically reviewed to close loopholes and include new firearms technology (E.g. Slide-loaders, grey guns and printing) BUT they should be nationally consistent (Currently they are not, not by a long shot — pun intended)

    McIlroy tosses a lot of numbers around but they mean nothing unless they can be shown to correlate with criminality and terrorism data (such data correlations ought to be done anyway). Similarly, he dismisses the QLD Police Minister (see article) without further comment. Tom obvioulsy thought it irrelevant to his argument. — which is what exactly? Not sure from this piece which concludes that nothing so far has been done to keep the community safe. Gee what an insight, thanks for that.

    Here is the link to the article if you wish to read it, but really, there’s nothing much in there to take in. It’s a rehash of what’s already been written many times already. Oh, and a whole lot of frightening gun numbers if you not anxious enough.

    This toot is an Opinion piece of my one.

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #AusPol #Bondi

  2. I have to say (because Tom McIlroy’s article is not a well written opinion piece — perhaps due to space limitations, still…) I am supportive of strict #GunLaws but even more so on the ability of the #Police to enforce them.

    Taking a helicopter view, what is urgently required is $$$ to fund both a #NationalBuyBack and sufficiently staffed #FirearmsRegistries to enable better control and oversight of #GunOwnership. Anything else is fiddling on the margins and largely political in intent. BTW, in so far as a national registry is concerned, Tom is happy to leave it at ‘speedier progress’ is being made. It’s been progresing since #PortArthur mate. Do you think you could mention that? Apparently, according to Tom, ‘Smart public service minds’ have been totally incompetent and unable to find the right Consultancy to get it done. My take? It’s about #Power, #Control and $$$$ throughout the federation govts.

    To be clear, Gun Laws in Australia are up to the job, especially if periodically reviewed to close loopholes and include new firearms technology (E.g. Slide-loaders, grey guns and printing) BUT they should be nationally consistent (Currently they are not, not by a long shot — pun intended)

    McIlroy tosses a lot of numbers around but they mean nothing unless they can be shown to correlate with criminality and terrorism data (such data correlations ought to be done anyway). Similarly, he dismisses the QLD Police Minister (see article) without further comment. Tom obvioulsy thought it irrelevant to his argument. — which is what exactly? Not sure from this piece which concludes that nothing so far has been done to keep the community safe. Gee what an insight, thanks for that.

    Here is the link to the article if you wish to read it, but really, there’s nothing much in there to take in. It’s a rehash of what’s already been written many times already. Oh, and a whole lot of frightening gun numbers if you not anxious enough.

    This toot is an Opinion piece of my one.

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #AusPol #Bondi

  3. I have to say (because Tom McIlroy’s article is not a well written opinion piece — perhaps due to space limitations, still…) I am supportive of strict #GunLaws but even more so on the ability of the #Police to enforce them.

    Taking a helicopter view, what is urgently required is $$$ to fund both a #NationalBuyBack and sufficiently staffed #FirearmsRegistries to enable better control and oversight of #GunOwnership. Anything else is fiddling on the margins and largely political in intent. BTW, in so far as a national registry is concerned, Tom is happy to leave it at ‘speedier progress’ is being made. It’s been progresing since #PortArthur mate. Do you think you could mention that? Apparently, according to Tom, ‘Smart public service minds’ have been totally incompetent and unable to find the right Consultancy to get it done. My take? It’s about #Power, #Control and $$$$ throughout the federation govts.

    To be clear, Gun Laws in Australia are up to the job, especially if periodically reviewed to close loopholes and include new firearms technology (E.g. Slide-loaders, grey guns and printing) BUT they should be nationally consistent (Currently they are not, not by a long shot — pun intended)

    McIlroy tosses a lot of numbers around but they mean nothing unless they can be shown to correlate with criminality and terrorism data (such data correlations ought to be done anyway). Similarly, he dismisses the QLD Police Minister (see article) without further comment. Tom obvioulsy thought it irrelevant to his argument. — which is what exactly? Not sure from this piece which concludes that nothing so far has been done to keep the community safe. Gee what an insight, thanks for that.

    Here is the link to the article if you wish to read it, but really, there’s nothing much in there to take in. It’s a rehash of what’s already been written many times already. Oh, and a whole lot of frightening gun numbers if you not anxious enough.

    This toot is an Opinion piece of my one.

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #AusPol #Bondi

  4. I have to say (because Tom McIlroy’s article is not a well written opinion piece — perhaps due to space limitations, still…) I am supportive of strict #GunLaws but even more so on the ability of the #Police to enforce them.

    Taking a helicopter view, what is urgently required is $$$ to fund both a #NationalBuyBack and sufficiently staffed #FirearmsRegistries to enable better control and oversight of #GunOwnership. Anything else is fiddling on the margins and largely political in intent. BTW, in so far as a national registry is concerned, Tom is happy to leave it at ‘speedier progress’ is being made. It’s been progresing since #PortArthur mate. Do you think you could mention that? Apparently, according to Tom, ‘Smart public service minds’ have been totally incompetent and unable to find the right Consultancy to get it done. My take? It’s about #Power, #Control and $$$$ throughout the federation govts.

    To be clear, Gun Laws in Australia are up to the job, especially if periodically reviewed to close loopholes and include new firearms technology (E.g. Slide-loaders, grey guns and printing) BUT they should be nationally consistent (Currently they are not, not by a long shot — pun intended)

    McIlroy tosses a lot of numbers around but they mean nothing unless they can be shown to correlate with criminality and terrorism data (such data correlations ought to be done anyway). Similarly, he dismisses the QLD Police Minister (see article) without further comment. Tom obvioulsy thought it irrelevant to his argument. — which is what exactly? Not sure from this piece which concludes that nothing so far has been done to keep the community safe. Gee what an insight, thanks for that.

    Here is the link to the article if you wish to read it, but really, there’s nothing much in there to take in. It’s a rehash of what’s already been written many times already. Oh, and a whole lot of frightening gun numbers if you not anxious enough.

    This toot is an Opinion piece of my one.

    theguardian.com/australia-news

    #AusPol #Bondi

  5. Comparison of the 2023 and 2025 results of the U.S. National Survey of Gun Policy reveals that an increasing fraction of gun owners (mostly Republicans) valued gun ownership for protection against political violence, but a decreasing fraction thought gun ownership was important to advance political objectives.

    Summary: psypost.org/rising-number-of-a

    Original paper: link.springer.com/article/10.1

    #Guns #GunOwnership

  6. So I am a gun owner. I am not a NRA member because I think we can preserve our 2A rights while keeping people safe (Think the Swiss model) and it is amazing that the hard core, typically ultra conservative , you can take my gun from my cold dead hand types are not more up in arms.

    Walk back or not they are testing this to see how it goes and the gun nutters should be very very worried. #gun #gunownership #guncontrol #2A #secondamendment

    nbcnews.com/politics/justice-d

  7. "For all the legitimate reasons fueling progressive gun ownership, this trend also points to a perilous trajectory for the country. When citizens on both sides of the spectrum feel compelled to take up arms, it suggests that America is sliding toward a form of “militant democracy,” one in which political conflicts are increasingly defined by shows of force and the looming threat of violence. The more that Americans come to see guns as essential tools of political expression or self-preservation, the more our civic life becomes a powder keg, where every culture-shaking event may be met with talk of outright civil war. In such an environment, we risk our democratic norms giving way to fear, intimidation, and the ever-present possibility of confrontation.

    History offers a warning. Societies where opposing factions armed themselves — Weimar Germany in the 1930s, for example — often saw democracy deteriorate into street clashes and authoritarian crackdowns. Even in modern stable democracies abroad, it’s virtually unheard of for mainstream political groups to organize armed wings for “self-defense” in peacetime. The United States is entering an uncomfortable new territory: Rather than relying solely on institutions to resolve political disputes, people are preparing to defend their worldview with weapons in hand. It’s a dynamic that might deter some aggressors in the short term, but it also raises the stakes of every conflict and increases the risk that a spark could ignite something far worse."

    theintercept.com/2025/11/01/le

    #USA #Militarism #SecondAmendment #GunOwnership #Polarization

  8. NJ Gun Ownership for Veterans with Mental Health Disabilities: To purchase a firearm in New Jersey, residents must apply for a firearm purchaser identification card and, if seeking to purchase a…

    Continue reading on Medium » medium.com/@jeanmosquea/nj-gun #GunOwnership #Veterans #MentalHealth #NewJersey #Firearms

  9. @allynkhine @benroyce @jhavok @Catvalente

    #GunOwnership in the United States is significantly higher than in Russia.

    In the U.S., about 32% of adults personally own a gun, with over 393 million civilian-owned firearms, equating to 120.5 guns per 100 people.

    In contrast, only about 9% of Russians own firearms, with an estimated 13-17.6 million civilian guns, including many illegal ones, resulting in roughly 12.3 guns per 100 people.

    worldpopulationreview.com/coun

  10. @jcrabapple The most obvious things that will be of concern to leftist #Dems are that #Walz is a #GunOwner, a #Hunter & once received an "A" rating from the #NRA for his support of #GunOwnership .

    The NRA lowered its rating of Walz to "F" after he changed his position to allow more restrictions on #GunOwnership following the #Parkland shooting in #Florida (including as was just pointed out to me) that, as govenor, Walz implemented background checks to prevent "mentally unstable people" from purchasing guns in #Minnesota .

    So, while I do not believe that Walz will ever support a complete ban on gun ownership (other than for #AssaultWeapons ), he has already shown that he's willing to a support "common sense" restrictions on gun ownership that will lessen (but certainly not quell) the concerns of leftist Dems in this regard.

  11. #trump #shooting #guns #gunviolence #america #usa #armscontrol #guncontrol #assassination #nra #gunownership #weapons #election #unitedstates #donaldtrump So we have a controversial and aggressive political figure who supports the NRA, polarises a nation of gun owners, yet people are surprised when something happens?
    I’ve just seen an interview with a republican girl from “Women For Trump” who blamed the Democrats and still believes in gun ownership.
    Is there any wonder the USA’s in such a mess.

  12. #trump #shooting #guns #gunviolence #america #usa #armscontrol #guncontrol #assassination #nra #gunownership #weapons #election #unitedstates #donaldtrump
    I’m not sure if anyone remembers the ending to the book “The Dead Zone” by Stephen King, but it keeps coming into my mind tonight…

  13. Ukraine is one of few countries where the issue of firearms for citizens is not yet regulated by law. The team at @timkmak’s Counteroffensive have written about ongoing efforts to legislate around the ownership of guns, and the debate over whether Ukrainians would have been better able to resist the occupation with free access to weapons.

    counteroffensive.news/p/does-u

    #Guns #GunOwnership #Ukraine #UkraineWar #Newstodon #NewstodonFriday #FollowFriday

  14. Does Size Matter? Penis Dissatisfaction And Gun Ownership In America | University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas A&M University, Florida State University, pub'd by American Journal of Men's Health

    by @grrlscientist

    #GunOwnership #PenisSize #Men #Sociology #SciComm🧪 forbes.com/sites/grrlscientist

  15. Does Size Matter? Penis Dissatisfaction And Gun Ownership In America | University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas A&M University, Florida State University, pub'd by American Journal of Men's Health

    by @GrrlScientist

    #GunOwnership #PenisSize #Men #Sociology #SciComm🧪 forbes.com/sites/grrlscientist

  16. Both status-related threats and victimization-related fears shape why individuals own guns, and how they use guns. #NICHDImpact #GunViolence #GunOwnership #Firearms
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/367781

  17. CW: Gun Violence

    Dear America,

    You’re not exactly showing us that you can be trusted with #GunOwnership.

    standard.co.uk/news/world/ralp

    Please, do better, maybe let’s stop the #NRA and make guns a license you have to renew and be assessed for.

    - The Rest of the World

  18. Both status-related threats and victimization-related fears shape why individuals own guns, and how they use guns.

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/367781

    #NICHDImpact #GunOwnership #Crime #Victimization #Self-defense

  19. A well regulated militia means REGULATION!
    #UniversalBackgroundChecks
    Longer wait times & close loopholes
    Required training, license, & liability insurance for #gunownership
    Raise legal age to 21 yrs (25 wld be better)
    Criminalize leaving #firearms where a minor can reach it
    Remove the taxes on #gunsafety eqt
    #RedFlagLaws to remove #guns from those who are danger to self or others, incl #domesticviolence
    Ban on assault rifles & high capacity magazines
    #politics #factcheck #gunsafety #guncontrol