#vaginoplasty — Public Fediverse posts

Hey folks

Been trying and failing to write this post for a few days now.

Mood, health, energy, time, chores, obligations, and responsibilities kept getting in the way.

So, we're gonna summarise everything as much as we can, and try and limit our emotional response to it.

Important context

• We have been trying to get meaningful gender-affirming healthcare through the NHS since April 2021.
• We had tried to get clear information on surgery options, particularly genital reconfiguration surgery (GRS) options, for years, but never got clear options: only vague wording.
• We were almost certain sure that no form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty would be available, so we narrowed our choices to peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty or a bilateral orchidectomy.
  • We didn't and don't want penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) or vulvoplasty (aka zero-depth vaginoplasty).
• We finally passed all hurdles through an NHS pilot scheme (East Of England Gender Service; EOEGS) in late 2024.
  • This is under the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health (NCTH).
• Our surgery referral was only sent over to a private hospital by the NHS Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service (GDNRSS) in late 2025.
• We had an initial assessment meeting with that private hospital this week.

Information from meeting

• The NHS will not fund PPT vaginoplasty unless there's medically no other option (i.e., last resort).
  • Basically only if you've got "inadequate donor site skin" for other methods.
• Despite offering PPT privately, the hospital considers PIV the "gold standard", and was heavily biased against PPT, advising that PPT:
  • "is not self-lubricating";
  • has "more granulation tissue" and "more complications associated with it";
  • typically has a "worse surgical outcome";
  • "turns into skin" in the long run;
  • is more likely to "stenose" and "scar".
• No form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty is available (as we thought).
• The NHS will not fund the hospital to do standalone bilateral orchidectomies for any referrals sent to them via GDNRSS.
• The specific (and only surgeon) we had asked to be referred to did not pick up our referral.
  • Worse, a surgeon we absolutely do not want to go anywhere near picked up our case!!!
• We discovered that NHS gender clinics sit in on their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings to discuss patients' surgery requests!!!

Outcomes for us

After considering options and offers, we resignedly sent an email to the private hospital, requesting that they refer us back to GDNRSS, advising that:

• The GRS options were explained to us, but we did not find them suitable.
• The surgeon who offered to take our case was not suitable.
• We wish to discuss next steps with the GDNRSS.

Sadly, an individual funding request (IFR) will almost-certainly be required, but the gender clinic has previously refused to submit any IFRs for us, so we're kinda very likely to be screwed here.

For anybody not aware, IFRs get submitted to your local integrated care board / system (ICB/ICS) in England. They'll only agree to fund something if:

• There are "exceptional clinical circumstances" to support the request.
• The IFR clearly demonstrates "clinical exceptionality".

Although technically an NHS GP can submit an IFR, unless it comes from the NHS gender clinic with a detailed explanation of why they can't / won't fund the surgery and why it's necessary, the local ICB funding team will just reject the request.

This is sadly a major issue for us, as we've raised multiple complaints against our gender clinic for their awful service (or rather lack thereof) and they've stopped responding to any of our emails now, so there's little to no chance of them even agreeing to submit an IFR for us, let alone doing one with a decent chance of being accepted.

We don't know what the current price is for a bilateral orchidectomy, but it was up to about £6k a year or two back, so it's probably more like £7K to £8K now :Sighing_Face:

In other words, nothing we could afford privately any time in the next decade.

So... yeah 🙃

If you wondered why our posts have been a little bit more bleak the last few days, this is among the reasons 😅 (There are sadly many other things contributing too.)

It's our own fault really for even trying to go through the NHS route and thinking that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't continually fuck us around.

Anyway, that's the toot.

#NHS #NHSEngland #EOEGS #NCTH #trans #transgender #NonBinary #enby #FemEnby #GRS #GAS #vaginoplasty #orchidectomy #GenderAffirmingHealthcare #IFR #ICB #ICS #FuckTheNHS #FuckTheUK #DesegregateTransHealthcare #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

Hey folks

Been trying and failing to write this post for a few days now.

Mood, health, energy, time, chores, obligations, and responsibilities kept getting in the way.

So, we're gonna summarise everything as much as we can, and try and limit our emotional response to it.

Important context

• We have been trying to get meaningful gender-affirming healthcare through the NHS since April 2021.
• We had tried to get clear information on surgery options, particularly genital reconfiguration surgery (GRS) options, for years, but never got clear options: only vague wording.
• We were almost certain sure that no form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty would be available, so we narrowed our choices to peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty or a bilateral orchidectomy.
  • We didn't and don't want penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) or vulvoplasty (aka zero-depth vaginoplasty).
• We finally passed all hurdles through an NHS pilot scheme (East Of England Gender Service; EOEGS) in late 2024.
  • This is under the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health (NCTH).
• Our surgery referral was only sent over to a private hospital by the NHS Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service (GDNRSS) in late 2025.
• We had an initial assessment meeting with that private hospital this week.

Information from meeting

• The NHS will not fund PPT vaginoplasty unless there's medically no other option (i.e., last resort).
  • Basically only if you've got "inadequate donor site skin" for other methods.
• Despite offering PPT privately, the hospital considers PIV the "gold standard", and was heavily biased against PPT, advising that PPT:
  • "is not self-lubricating";
  • has "more granulation tissue" and "more complications associated with it";
  • typically has a "worse surgical outcome";
  • "turns into skin" in the long run;
  • is more likely to "stenose" and "scar".
• No form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty is available (as we thought).
• The NHS will not fund the hospital to do standalone bilateral orchidectomies for any referrals sent to them via GDNRSS.
• The specific (and only surgeon) we had asked to be referred to did not pick up our referral.
  • Worse, a surgeon we absolutely do not want to go anywhere near picked up our case!!!
• We discovered that NHS gender clinics sit in on their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings to discuss patients' surgery requests!!!

Outcomes for us

After considering options and offers, we resignedly sent an email to the private hospital, requesting that they refer us back to GDNRSS, advising that:

• The GRS options were explained to us, but we did not find them suitable.
• The surgeon who offered to take our case was not suitable.
• We wish to discuss next steps with the GDNRSS.

Sadly, an individual funding request (IFR) will almost-certainly be required, but the gender clinic has previously refused to submit any IFRs for us, so we're kinda very likely to be screwed here.

For anybody not aware, IFRs get submitted to your local integrated care board / system (ICB/ICS) in England. They'll only agree to fund something if:

• There are "exceptional clinical circumstances" to support the request.
• The IFR clearly demonstrates "clinical exceptionality".

Although technically an NHS GP can submit an IFR, unless it comes from the NHS gender clinic with a detailed explanation of why they can't / won't fund the surgery and why it's necessary, the local ICB funding team will just reject the request.

This is sadly a major issue for us, as we've raised multiple complaints against our gender clinic for their awful service (or rather lack thereof) and they've stopped responding to any of our emails now, so there's little to no chance of them even agreeing to submit an IFR for us, let alone doing one with a decent chance of being accepted.

We don't know what the current price is for a bilateral orchidectomy, but it was up to about £6k a year or two back, so it's probably more like £7K to £8K now :Sighing_Face:

In other words, nothing we could afford privately any time in the next decade.

So... yeah 🙃

If you wondered why our posts have been a little bit more bleak the last few days, this is among the reasons 😅 (There are sadly many other things contributing too.)

It's our own fault really for even trying to go through the NHS route and thinking that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't continually fuck us around.

Anyway, that's the toot.

#NHS #NHSEngland #EOEGS #NCTH #trans #transgender #NonBinary #enby #FemEnby #GRS #GAS #vaginoplasty #orchidectomy #GenderAffirmingHealthcare #IFR #ICB #ICS #FuckTheNHS #FuckTheUK #DesegregateTransHealthcare #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

Hey folks

Been trying and failing to write this post for a few days now.

Mood, health, energy, time, chores, obligations, and responsibilities kept getting in the way.

So, we're gonna summarise everything as much as we can, and try and limit our emotional response to it.

Important context

• We have been trying to get meaningful gender-affirming healthcare through the NHS since April 2021.
• We had tried to get clear information on surgery options, particularly genital reconfiguration surgery (GRS) options, for years, but never got clear options: only vague wording.
• We were almost certain sure that no form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty would be available, so we narrowed our choices to peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty or a bilateral orchidectomy.
  • We didn't and don't want penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) or vulvoplasty (aka zero-depth vaginoplasty).
• We finally passed all hurdles through an NHS pilot scheme (East Of England Gender Service; EOEGS) in late 2024.
  • This is under the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health (NCTH).
• Our surgery referral was only sent over to a private hospital by the NHS Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service (GDNRSS) in late 2025.
• We had an initial assessment meeting with that private hospital this week.

Information from meeting

• The NHS will not fund PPT vaginoplasty unless there's medically no other option (i.e., last resort).
  • Basically only if you've got "inadequate donor site skin" for other methods.
• Despite offering PPT privately, the hospital considers PIV the "gold standard", and was heavily biased against PPT, advising that PPT:
  • "is not self-lubricating";
  • has "more granulation tissue" and "more complications associated with it";
  • typically has a "worse surgical outcome";
  • "turns into skin" in the long run;
  • is more likely to "stenose" and "scar".
• No form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty is available (as we thought).
• The NHS will not fund the hospital to do standalone bilateral orchidectomies for any referrals sent to them via GDNRSS.
• The specific (and only surgeon) we had asked to be referred to did not pick up our referral.
  • Worse, a surgeon we absolutely do not want to go anywhere near picked up our case!!!
• We discovered that NHS gender clinics sit in on their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings to discuss patients' surgery requests!!!

Outcomes for us

After considering options and offers, we resignedly sent an email to the private hospital, requesting that they refer us back to GDNRSS, advising that:

• The GRS options were explained to us, but we did not find them suitable.
• The surgeon who offered to take our case was not suitable.
• We wish to discuss next steps with the GDNRSS.

Sadly, an individual funding request (IFR) will almost-certainly be required, but the gender clinic has previously refused to submit any IFRs for us, so we're kinda very likely to be screwed here.

For anybody not aware, IFRs get submitted to your local integrated care board / system (ICB/ICS) in England. They'll only agree to fund something if:

• There are "exceptional clinical circumstances" to support the request.
• The IFR clearly demonstrates "clinical exceptionality".

Although technically an NHS GP can submit an IFR, unless it comes from the NHS gender clinic with a detailed explanation of why they can't / won't fund the surgery and why it's necessary, the local ICB funding team will just reject the request.

This is sadly a major issue for us, as we've raised multiple complaints against our gender clinic for their awful service (or rather lack thereof) and they've stopped responding to any of our emails now, so there's little to no chance of them even agreeing to submit an IFR for us, let alone doing one with a decent chance of being accepted.

We don't know what the current price is for a bilateral orchidectomy, but it was up to about £6k a year or two back, so it's probably more like £7K to £8K now :Sighing_Face:

In other words, nothing we could afford privately any time in the next decade.

So... yeah 🙃

If you wondered why our posts have been a little bit more bleak the last few days, this is among the reasons 😅 (There are sadly many other things contributing too.)

It's our own fault really for even trying to go through the NHS route and thinking that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't continually fuck us around.

Anyway, that's the toot.

#NHS #NHSEngland #EOEGS #NCTH #trans #transgender #NonBinary #enby #FemEnby #GRS #GAS #vaginoplasty #orchidectomy #GenderAffirmingHealthcare #IFR #ICB #ICS #FuckTheNHS #FuckTheUK #DesegregateTransHealthcare #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

Hey folks

Been trying and failing to write this post for a few days now.

Mood, health, energy, time, chores, obligations, and responsibilities kept getting in the way.

So, we're gonna summarise everything as much as we can, and try and limit our emotional response to it.

Important context

• We have been trying to get meaningful gender-affirming healthcare through the NHS since April 2021.
• We had tried to get clear information on surgery options, particularly genital reconfiguration surgery (GRS) options, for years, but never got clear options: only vague wording.
• We were almost certain sure that no form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty would be available, so we narrowed our choices to peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty or a bilateral orchidectomy.
  • We didn't and don't want penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) or vulvoplasty (aka zero-depth vaginoplasty).
• We finally passed all hurdles through an NHS pilot scheme (East Of England Gender Service; EOEGS) in late 2024.
  • This is under the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health (NCTH).
• Our surgery referral was only sent over to a private hospital by the NHS Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service (GDNRSS) in late 2025.
• We had an initial assessment meeting with that private hospital this week.

Information from meeting

• The NHS will not fund PPT vaginoplasty unless there's medically no other option (i.e., last resort).
  • Basically only if you've got "inadequate donor site skin" for other methods.
• Despite offering PPT privately, the hospital considers PIV the "gold standard", and was heavily biased against PPT, advising that PPT:
  • "is not self-lubricating";
  • has "more granulation tissue" and "more complications associated with it";
  • typically has a "worse surgical outcome";
  • "turns into skin" in the long run;
  • is more likely to "stenose" and "scar".
• No form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty is available (as we thought).
• The NHS will not fund the hospital to do standalone bilateral orchidectomies for any referrals sent to them via GDNRSS.
• The specific (and only surgeon) we had asked to be referred to did not pick up our referral.
  • Worse, a surgeon we absolutely do not want to go anywhere near picked up our case!!!
• We discovered that NHS gender clinics sit in on their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings to discuss patients' surgery requests!!!

Outcomes for us

After considering options and offers, we resignedly sent an email to the private hospital, requesting that they refer us back to GDNRSS, advising that:

• The GRS options were explained to us, but we did not find them suitable.
• The surgeon who offered to take our case was not suitable.
• We wish to discuss next steps with the GDNRSS.

Sadly, an individual funding request (IFR) will almost-certainly be required, but the gender clinic has previously refused to submit any IFRs for us, so we're kinda very likely to be screwed here.

For anybody not aware, IFRs get submitted to your local integrated care board / system (ICB/ICS) in England. They'll only agree to fund something if:

• There are "exceptional clinical circumstances" to support the request.
• The IFR clearly demonstrates "clinical exceptionality".

Although technically an NHS GP can submit an IFR, unless it comes from the NHS gender clinic with a detailed explanation of why they can't / won't fund the surgery and why it's necessary, the local ICB funding team will just reject the request.

This is sadly a major issue for us, as we've raised multiple complaints against our gender clinic for their awful service (or rather lack thereof) and they've stopped responding to any of our emails now, so there's little to no chance of them even agreeing to submit an IFR for us, let alone doing one with a decent chance of being accepted.

We don't know what the current price is for a bilateral orchidectomy, but it was up to about £6k a year or two back, so it's probably more like £7K to £8K now :Sighing_Face:

In other words, nothing we could afford privately any time in the next decade.

So... yeah 🙃

If you wondered why our posts have been a little bit more bleak the last few days, this is among the reasons 😅 (There are sadly many other things contributing too.)

It's our own fault really for even trying to go through the NHS route and thinking that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't continually fuck us around.

Anyway, that's the toot.

#NHS #NHSEngland #EOEGS #NCTH #trans #transgender #NonBinary #enby #FemEnby #GRS #GAS #vaginoplasty #orchidectomy #GenderAffirmingHealthcare #IFR #ICB #ICS #FuckTheNHS #FuckTheUK #DesegregateTransHealthcare #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

Hey folks

Been trying and failing to write this post for a few days now.

Mood, health, energy, time, chores, obligations, and responsibilities kept getting in the way.

So, we're gonna summarise everything as much as we can, and try and limit our emotional response to it.

Important context

• We have been trying to get meaningful gender-affirming healthcare through the NHS since April 2021.
• We had tried to get clear information on surgery options, particularly genital reconfiguration surgery (GRS) options, for years, but never got clear options: only vague wording.
• We were almost certain sure that no form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty would be available, so we narrowed our choices to peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty or a bilateral orchidectomy.
  • We didn't and don't want penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) or vulvoplasty (aka zero-depth vaginoplasty).
• We finally passed all hurdles through an NHS pilot scheme (East Of England Gender Service; EOEGS) in late 2024.
  • This is under the Nottingham Centre for Transgender Health (NCTH).
• Our surgery referral was only sent over to a private hospital by the NHS Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service (GDNRSS) in late 2025.
• We had an initial assessment meeting with that private hospital this week.

Information from meeting

• The NHS will not fund PPT vaginoplasty unless there's medically no other option (i.e., last resort).
  • Basically only if you've got "inadequate donor site skin" for other methods.
• Despite offering PPT privately, the hospital considers PIV the "gold standard", and was heavily biased against PPT, advising that PPT:
  • "is not self-lubricating";
  • has "more granulation tissue" and "more complications associated with it";
  • typically has a "worse surgical outcome";
  • "turns into skin" in the long run;
  • is more likely to "stenose" and "scar".
• No form of penile-preserving vaginoplasty is available (as we thought).
• The NHS will not fund the hospital to do standalone bilateral orchidectomies for any referrals sent to them via GDNRSS.
• The specific (and only surgeon) we had asked to be referred to did not pick up our referral.
  • Worse, a surgeon we absolutely do not want to go anywhere near picked up our case!!!
• We discovered that NHS gender clinics sit in on their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings to discuss patients' surgery requests!!!

Outcomes for us

After considering options and offers, we resignedly sent an email to the private hospital, requesting that they refer us back to GDNRSS, advising that:

• The GRS options were explained to us, but we did not find them suitable.
• The surgeon who offered to take our case was not suitable.
• We wish to discuss next steps with the GDNRSS.

Sadly, an individual funding request (IFR) will almost-certainly be required, but the gender clinic has previously refused to submit any IFRs for us, so we're kinda very likely to be screwed here.

For anybody not aware, IFRs get submitted to your local integrated care board / system (ICB/ICS) in England. They'll only agree to fund something if:

• There are "exceptional clinical circumstances" to support the request.
• The IFR clearly demonstrates "clinical exceptionality".

Although technically an NHS GP can submit an IFR, unless it comes from the NHS gender clinic with a detailed explanation of why they can't / won't fund the surgery and why it's necessary, the local ICB funding team will just reject the request.

This is sadly a major issue for us, as we've raised multiple complaints against our gender clinic for their awful service (or rather lack thereof) and they've stopped responding to any of our emails now, so there's little to no chance of them even agreeing to submit an IFR for us, let alone doing one with a decent chance of being accepted.

We don't know what the current price is for a bilateral orchidectomy, but it was up to about £6k a year or two back, so it's probably more like £7K to £8K now :Sighing_Face:

In other words, nothing we could afford privately any time in the next decade.

So... yeah 🙃

If you wondered why our posts have been a little bit more bleak the last few days, this is among the reasons 😅 (There are sadly many other things contributing too.)

It's our own fault really for even trying to go through the NHS route and thinking that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't continually fuck us around.

Anyway, that's the toot.

#NHS #NHSEngland #EOEGS #NCTH #trans #transgender #NonBinary #enby #FemEnby #GRS #GAS #vaginoplasty #orchidectomy #GenderAffirmingHealthcare #IFR #ICB #ICS #FuckTheNHS #FuckTheUK #DesegregateTransHealthcare #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

Hey folks :FediverseSymbol:

Per the details of this earlier post, we had our 4th appointment with the NHS East of England Gender Service (EOEGS) today.

The worst thing about that appointment was that it was at 13:30-14:30, which put us into a kind of neurodivergent purgatory / paralysis, where we felt like we really couldn't get on with the day until the appointment, as it was all we could think about pretty much.

We did manage to distract ourselves for a while by passing feedback to Union Medico over the syringe holders they provide for their 90° Super Grip auto-injector. We're planning to do a full review of that for everyone this week.

Anyway, the appointment went well. The doctor (cis guy, he/him) pretty much made it clear that he just needed to gather more info for the referral, and that he didn't expect there to be any issues. He asked whether it would be okay for a trainee colleague to sit in on the call, which we were fine with, especially as we're pretty sure she was trans herself. At the very least, she gave off good vibes.

Despite being anxious AF the whole time, and having to play the good-little-trans-patient to pass through the gatekeeping, it was just a serious of questions about medical history, what we were after, the risks, the reasons for wanting this, whether we had stored gametes etc.

Despite the many risks (e.g., fistula; granulation tissue; prolapse; etc), long recovery time, and the need for very regular dilation for ages, we agree that the benefits are worth it.

The doctor seemed suitably impressed by our knowledge and sources (e.g., Gender Construction Kit; TransActual), as well as the limited options on the figurative #NHS menu for trans gender-affirming surgeries.

If you're trans fem, your options via the NHS are:

• Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).
  • Creates a neovagina using material from the penis turned inside out ("inverted").
• Penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty.
  • Creates the vagina using material from both the penis and scrotum.
  • Typically done if you've not got much material to work with 😅
• Cosmetic vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a vulva and labia (labiaplasty), and a clitoris (clitoroplasty) from the penis (and scrotum if needed), but without a neovagina.
  • Aka vulvoplasty or zero-depth.

Please note the lack of:

• Peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty.
  • A newer technique that involves several incisions into the abdomen and using internal peritoneal tissue to create the neovagina.
• Penile-preserving vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a neovagina using peritoneal tissue, without removing the penis.
  • Aka penile preservation vaginoplasty, phallus-preserving vulvovaginoplasty, etc.
• Standalone bilateral orchidectomy.
  • Removes the testes and scrotum.
  • Sometimes known as a bofa-ectomy.

The NHS, as standard, also does not offer:

• Facial feminisation surgery (FFS) of any kind.
• Voice feminisation surgery (VFS).
  • We're seeking an endoscopic modified Wendler glottoplasty by Chadwan Al Yaghchi at the London Voice & Swallowing Clinic in London.
• Breast augmentation (BA).
• Full facial hair removal.
  • It varies by nation, but England offers 8 laser sessions, 16 hours of electrolysis, or a combination thereof.
  • For context, we've had over 40 hours of electrolysis (thermolysis) thus far on our face and neck with a highly-experienced (and fast) electrologist, and there are still a few stragglers.

There is a mere sliver of a fraction of a chance that we might get the NHS to fund some of our additional needs, which they don't currently provide: Individual Funding Requests (IFRs).

We're not going to sugarcoat it: the IFR route is highly likely to fail for us :FaceExhaling: Your "clinical circumstances" must be "exceptional" and the benefit clear in order to "receive benefit from a treatment or service that isn’t routinely offered by the NHS".

Even getting the EOEGS to accept that it was their responsibility to fill in any IFRs required us to contact NHS England's dedicated team for IFRs. They were not particularly happy about this.

Despite making them aware of their IFR responsibilities in March 2024, they have seemingly still not put any procedure in place for IFRs.

The doctor made notes about this during our appointment, along with our bespoke requests, and advised that he would follow this up with the first doctor involved, as well as the person in charge. (Can't remember the precise term. Service lead? Clinical lead?)

Anyway, once we've got them to fill out the bleeping IFRs, those will then be submitted to our local Integrated Care Board (ICB).

They used to be called Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), but suddenly changed the name and structure back in July 2022.

To make the structure even less clear, each ICB sits under a broader Integrated Care System (ICS).

We'll continue to share info on how it all goes, but realistically we expect all our requests to be denied, as they likely won't want to set a precedent or cough up the funding.

However, at least we'll then know that we've tried every official route we could before setting up any kind of crowdfunding campaign(s).

#NHS #NHSEngland #trans #transgender #TransFem #healthcare #TransHealthcare #EOEGS #UnionMedico #gatekeeping #vaginoplasty #PIV #PPT #orchidectomy #BofaEctomy #FFS #VFS #FacialFeminisationSurgery #VoiceFeminisationSurgery #glottoplasty #HairRemoval #ICB #ICS #IFR #IndividualFundingRequest #IntegratedCareSystem #IntegratedCareBoard #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LaserHairRemoval #LaserHairReduction #electrolysis #thermolysis #neurodivergent #neurodivergence

Hey folks :FediverseSymbol:

Per the details of this earlier post, we had our 4th appointment with the NHS East of England Gender Service (EOEGS) today.

The worst thing about that appointment was that it was at 13:30-14:30, which put us into a kind of neurodivergent purgatory / paralysis, where we felt like we really couldn't get on with the day until the appointment, as it was all we could think about pretty much.

We did manage to distract ourselves for a while by passing feedback to Union Medico over the syringe holders they provide for their 90° Super Grip auto-injector. We're planning to do a full review of that for everyone this week.

Anyway, the appointment went well. The doctor (cis guy, he/him) pretty much made it clear that he just needed to gather more info for the referral, and that he didn't expect there to be any issues. He asked whether it would be okay for a trainee colleague to sit in on the call, which we were fine with, especially as we're pretty sure she was trans herself. At the very least, she gave off good vibes.

Despite being anxious AF the whole time, and having to play the good-little-trans-patient to pass through the gatekeeping, it was just a serious of questions about medical history, what we were after, the risks, the reasons for wanting this, whether we had stored gametes etc.

Despite the many risks (e.g., fistula; granulation tissue; prolapse; etc), long recovery time, and the need for very regular dilation for ages, we agree that the benefits are worth it.

The doctor seemed suitably impressed by our knowledge and sources (e.g., Gender Construction Kit; TransActual), as well as the limited options on the figurative #NHS menu for trans gender-affirming surgeries.

If you're trans fem, your options via the NHS are:

• Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).
  • Creates a neovagina using material from the penis turned inside out ("inverted").
• Penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty.
  • Creates the vagina using material from both the penis and scrotum.
  • Typically done if you've not got much material to work with 😅
• Cosmetic vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a vulva and labia (labiaplasty), and a clitoris (clitoroplasty) from the penis (and scrotum if needed), but without a neovagina.
  • Aka vulvoplasty or zero-depth.

Please note the lack of:

• Peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty.
  • A newer technique that involves several incisions into the abdomen and using internal peritoneal tissue to create the neovagina.
• Penile-preserving vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a neovagina using peritoneal tissue, without removing the penis.
  • Aka penile preservation vaginoplasty, phallus-preserving vulvovaginoplasty, etc.
• Standalone bilateral orchidectomy.
  • Removes the testes and scrotum.
  • Sometimes known as a bofa-ectomy.

The NHS, as standard, also does not offer:

• Facial feminisation surgery (FFS) of any kind.
• Voice feminisation surgery (VFS).
  • We're seeking an endoscopic modified Wendler glottoplasty by Chadwan Al Yaghchi at the London Voice & Swallowing Clinic in London.
• Breast augmentation (BA).
• Full facial hair removal.
  • It varies by nation, but England offers 8 laser sessions, 16 hours of electrolysis, or a combination thereof.
  • For context, we've had over 40 hours of electrolysis (thermolysis) thus far on our face and neck with a highly-experienced (and fast) electrologist, and there are still a few stragglers.

There is a mere sliver of a fraction of a chance that we might get the NHS to fund some of our additional needs, which they don't currently provide: Individual Funding Requests (IFRs).

We're not going to sugarcoat it: the IFR route is highly likely to fail for us :FaceExhaling: Your "clinical circumstances" must be "exceptional" and the benefit clear in order to "receive benefit from a treatment or service that isn’t routinely offered by the NHS".

Even getting the EOEGS to accept that it was their responsibility to fill in any IFRs required us to contact NHS England's dedicated team for IFRs. They were not particularly happy about this.

Despite making them aware of their IFR responsibilities in March 2024, they have seemingly still not put any procedure in place for IFRs.

The doctor made notes about this during our appointment, along with our bespoke requests, and advised that he would follow this up with the first doctor involved, as well as the person in charge. (Can't remember the precise term. Service lead? Clinical lead?)

Anyway, once we've got them to fill out the bleeping IFRs, those will then be submitted to our local Integrated Care Board (ICB).

They used to be called Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), but suddenly changed the name and structure back in July 2022.

To make the structure even less clear, each ICB sits under a broader Integrated Care System (ICS).

We'll continue to share info on how it all goes, but realistically we expect all our requests to be denied, as they likely won't want to set a precedent or cough up the funding.

However, at least we'll then know that we've tried every official route we could before setting up any kind of crowdfunding campaign(s).

#NHS #NHSEngland #trans #transgender #TransFem #healthcare #TransHealthcare #EOEGS #UnionMedico #gatekeeping #vaginoplasty #PIV #PPT #orchidectomy #BofaEctomy #FFS #VFS #FacialFeminisationSurgery #VoiceFeminisationSurgery #glottoplasty #HairRemoval #ICB #ICS #IFR #IndividualFundingRequest #IntegratedCareSystem #IntegratedCareBoard #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LaserHairRemoval #LaserHairReduction #electrolysis #thermolysis #neurodivergent #neurodivergence

Hey folks :FediverseSymbol:

Per the details of this earlier post, we had our 4th appointment with the NHS East of England Gender Service (EOEGS) today.

The worst thing about that appointment was that it was at 13:30-14:30, which put us into a kind of neurodivergent purgatory / paralysis, where we felt like we really couldn't get on with the day until the appointment, as it was all we could think about pretty much.

We did manage to distract ourselves for a while by passing feedback to Union Medico over the syringe holders they provide for their 90° Super Grip auto-injector. We're planning to do a full review of that for everyone this week.

Anyway, the appointment went well. The doctor (cis guy, he/him) pretty much made it clear that he just needed to gather more info for the referral, and that he didn't expect there to be any issues. He asked whether it would be okay for a trainee colleague to sit in on the call, which we were fine with, especially as we're pretty sure she was trans herself. At the very least, she gave off good vibes.

Despite being anxious AF the whole time, and having to play the good-little-trans-patient to pass through the gatekeeping, it was just a serious of questions about medical history, what we were after, the risks, the reasons for wanting this, whether we had stored gametes etc.

Despite the many risks (e.g., fistula; granulation tissue; prolapse; etc), long recovery time, and the need for very regular dilation for ages, we agree that the benefits are worth it.

The doctor seemed suitably impressed by our knowledge and sources (e.g., Gender Construction Kit; TransActual), as well as the limited options on the figurative #NHS menu for trans gender-affirming surgeries.

If you're trans fem, your options via the NHS are:

• Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).
  • Creates a neovagina using material from the penis turned inside out ("inverted").
• Penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty.
  • Creates the vagina using material from both the penis and scrotum.
  • Typically done if you've not got much material to work with 😅
• Cosmetic vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a vulva and labia (labiaplasty), and a clitoris (clitoroplasty) from the penis (and scrotum if needed), but without a neovagina.
  • Aka vulvoplasty or zero-depth.

Please note the lack of:

• Peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty.
  • A newer technique that involves several incisions into the abdomen and using internal peritoneal tissue to create the neovagina.
• Penile-preserving vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a neovagina using peritoneal tissue, without removing the penis.
  • Aka penile preservation vaginoplasty, phallus-preserving vulvovaginoplasty, etc.
• Standalone bilateral orchidectomy.
  • Removes the testes and scrotum.
  • Sometimes known as a bofa-ectomy.

The NHS, as standard, also does not offer:

• Facial feminisation surgery (FFS) of any kind.
• Voice feminisation surgery (VFS).
  • We're seeking an endoscopic modified Wendler glottoplasty by Chadwan Al Yaghchi at the London Voice & Swallowing Clinic in London.
• Breast augmentation (BA).
• Full facial hair removal.
  • It varies by nation, but England offers 8 laser sessions, 16 hours of electrolysis, or a combination thereof.
  • For context, we've had over 40 hours of electrolysis (thermolysis) thus far on our face and neck with a highly-experienced (and fast) electrologist, and there are still a few stragglers.

There is a mere sliver of a fraction of a chance that we might get the NHS to fund some of our additional needs, which they don't currently provide: Individual Funding Requests (IFRs).

We're not going to sugarcoat it: the IFR route is highly likely to fail for us :FaceExhaling: Your "clinical circumstances" must be "exceptional" and the benefit clear in order to "receive benefit from a treatment or service that isn’t routinely offered by the NHS".

Even getting the EOEGS to accept that it was their responsibility to fill in any IFRs required us to contact NHS England's dedicated team for IFRs. They were not particularly happy about this.

Despite making them aware of their IFR responsibilities in March 2024, they have seemingly still not put any procedure in place for IFRs.

The doctor made notes about this during our appointment, along with our bespoke requests, and advised that he would follow this up with the first doctor involved, as well as the person in charge. (Can't remember the precise term. Service lead? Clinical lead?)

Anyway, once we've got them to fill out the bleeping IFRs, those will then be submitted to our local Integrated Care Board (ICB).

They used to be called Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), but suddenly changed the name and structure back in July 2022.

To make the structure even less clear, each ICB sits under a broader Integrated Care System (ICS).

We'll continue to share info on how it all goes, but realistically we expect all our requests to be denied, as they likely won't want to set a precedent or cough up the funding.

However, at least we'll then know that we've tried every official route we could before setting up any kind of crowdfunding campaign(s).

#NHS #NHSEngland #trans #transgender #TransFem #healthcare #TransHealthcare #EOEGS #UnionMedico #gatekeeping #vaginoplasty #PIV #PPT #orchidectomy #BofaEctomy #FFS #VFS #FacialFeminisationSurgery #VoiceFeminisationSurgery #glottoplasty #HairRemoval #ICB #ICS #IFR #IndividualFundingRequest #IntegratedCareSystem #IntegratedCareBoard #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LaserHairRemoval #LaserHairReduction #electrolysis #thermolysis #neurodivergent #neurodivergence

Hey folks :FediverseSymbol:

Per the details of this earlier post, we had our 4th appointment with the NHS East of England Gender Service (EOEGS) today.

The worst thing about that appointment was that it was at 13:30-14:30, which put us into a kind of neurodivergent purgatory / paralysis, where we felt like we really couldn't get on with the day until the appointment, as it was all we could think about pretty much.

We did manage to distract ourselves for a while by passing feedback to Union Medico over the syringe holders they provide for their 90° Super Grip auto-injector. We're planning to do a full review of that for everyone this week.

Anyway, the appointment went well. The doctor (cis guy, he/him) pretty much made it clear that he just needed to gather more info for the referral, and that he didn't expect there to be any issues. He asked whether it would be okay for a trainee colleague to sit in on the call, which we were fine with, especially as we're pretty sure she was trans herself. At the very least, she gave off good vibes.

Despite being anxious AF the whole time, and having to play the good-little-trans-patient to pass through the gatekeeping, it was just a serious of questions about medical history, what we were after, the risks, the reasons for wanting this, whether we had stored gametes etc.

Despite the many risks (e.g., fistula; granulation tissue; prolapse; etc), long recovery time, and the need for very regular dilation for ages, we agree that the benefits are worth it.

The doctor seemed suitably impressed by our knowledge and sources (e.g., Gender Construction Kit; TransActual), as well as the limited options on the figurative #NHS menu for trans gender-affirming surgeries.

If you're trans fem, your options via the NHS are:

• Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).
  • Creates a neovagina using material from the penis turned inside out ("inverted").
• Penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty.
  • Creates the vagina using material from both the penis and scrotum.
  • Typically done if you've not got much material to work with 😅
• Cosmetic vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a vulva and labia (labiaplasty), and a clitoris (clitoroplasty) from the penis (and scrotum if needed), but without a neovagina.
  • Aka vulvoplasty or zero-depth.

Please note the lack of:

• Peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty.
  • A newer technique that involves several incisions into the abdomen and using internal peritoneal tissue to create the neovagina.
• Penile-preserving vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a neovagina using peritoneal tissue, without removing the penis.
  • Aka penile preservation vaginoplasty, phallus-preserving vulvovaginoplasty, etc.
• Standalone bilateral orchidectomy.
  • Removes the testes and scrotum.
  • Sometimes known as a bofa-ectomy.

The NHS, as standard, also does not offer:

• Facial feminisation surgery (FFS) of any kind.
• Voice feminisation surgery (VFS).
  • We're seeking an endoscopic modified Wendler glottoplasty by Chadwan Al Yaghchi at the London Voice & Swallowing Clinic in London.
• Breast augmentation (BA).
• Full facial hair removal.
  • It varies by nation, but England offers 8 laser sessions, 16 hours of electrolysis, or a combination thereof.
  • For context, we've had over 40 hours of electrolysis (thermolysis) thus far on our face and neck with a highly-experienced (and fast) electrologist, and there are still a few stragglers.

There is a mere sliver of a fraction of a chance that we might get the NHS to fund some of our additional needs, which they don't currently provide: Individual Funding Requests (IFRs).

We're not going to sugarcoat it: the IFR route is highly likely to fail for us :FaceExhaling: Your "clinical circumstances" must be "exceptional" and the benefit clear in order to "receive benefit from a treatment or service that isn’t routinely offered by the NHS".

Even getting the EOEGS to accept that it was their responsibility to fill in any IFRs required us to contact NHS England's dedicated team for IFRs. They were not particularly happy about this.

Despite making them aware of their IFR responsibilities in March 2024, they have seemingly still not put any procedure in place for IFRs.

The doctor made notes about this during our appointment, along with our bespoke requests, and advised that he would follow this up with the first doctor involved, as well as the person in charge. (Can't remember the precise term. Service lead? Clinical lead?)

Anyway, once we've got them to fill out the bleeping IFRs, those will then be submitted to our local Integrated Care Board (ICB).

They used to be called Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), but suddenly changed the name and structure back in July 2022.

To make the structure even less clear, each ICB sits under a broader Integrated Care System (ICS).

We'll continue to share info on how it all goes, but realistically we expect all our requests to be denied, as they likely won't want to set a precedent or cough up the funding.

However, at least we'll then know that we've tried every official route we could before setting up any kind of crowdfunding campaign(s).

#NHS #NHSEngland #trans #transgender #TransFem #healthcare #TransHealthcare #EOEGS #UnionMedico #gatekeeping #vaginoplasty #PIV #PPT #orchidectomy #BofaEctomy #FFS #VFS #FacialFeminisationSurgery #VoiceFeminisationSurgery #glottoplasty #HairRemoval #ICB #ICS #IFR #IndividualFundingRequest #IntegratedCareSystem #IntegratedCareBoard #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LaserHairRemoval #LaserHairReduction #electrolysis #thermolysis #neurodivergent #neurodivergence

Hey folks :FediverseSymbol:

Per the details of this earlier post, we had our 4th appointment with the NHS East of England Gender Service (EOEGS) today.

The worst thing about that appointment was that it was at 13:30-14:30, which put us into a kind of neurodivergent purgatory / paralysis, where we felt like we really couldn't get on with the day until the appointment, as it was all we could think about pretty much.

We did manage to distract ourselves for a while by passing feedback to Union Medico over the syringe holders they provide for their 90° Super Grip auto-injector. We're planning to do a full review of that for everyone this week.

Anyway, the appointment went well. The doctor (cis guy, he/him) pretty much made it clear that he just needed to gather more info for the referral, and that he didn't expect there to be any issues. He asked whether it would be okay for a trainee colleague to sit in on the call, which we were fine with, especially as we're pretty sure she was trans herself. At the very least, she gave off good vibes.

Despite being anxious AF the whole time, and having to play the good-little-trans-patient to pass through the gatekeeping, it was just a serious of questions about medical history, what we were after, the risks, the reasons for wanting this, whether we had stored gametes etc.

Despite the many risks (e.g., fistula; granulation tissue; prolapse; etc), long recovery time, and the need for very regular dilation for ages, we agree that the benefits are worth it.

The doctor seemed suitably impressed by our knowledge and sources (e.g., Gender Construction Kit; TransActual), as well as the limited options on the figurative #NHS menu for trans gender-affirming surgeries.

If you're trans fem, your options via the NHS are:

• Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).
  • Creates a neovagina using material from the penis turned inside out ("inverted").
• Penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty.
  • Creates the vagina using material from both the penis and scrotum.
  • Typically done if you've not got much material to work with 😅
• Cosmetic vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a vulva and labia (labiaplasty), and a clitoris (clitoroplasty) from the penis (and scrotum if needed), but without a neovagina.
  • Aka vulvoplasty or zero-depth.

Please note the lack of:

• Peritoneal pull-through (PPT) vaginoplasty.
  • A newer technique that involves several incisions into the abdomen and using internal peritoneal tissue to create the neovagina.
• Penile-preserving vaginoplasty.
  • Creates a neovagina using peritoneal tissue, without removing the penis.
  • Aka penile preservation vaginoplasty, phallus-preserving vulvovaginoplasty, etc.
• Standalone bilateral orchidectomy.
  • Removes the testes and scrotum.
  • Sometimes known as a bofa-ectomy.

The NHS, as standard, also does not offer:

• Facial feminisation surgery (FFS) of any kind.
• Voice feminisation surgery (VFS).
  • We're seeking an endoscopic modified Wendler glottoplasty by Chadwan Al Yaghchi at the London Voice & Swallowing Clinic in London.
• Breast augmentation (BA).
• Full facial hair removal.
  • It varies by nation, but England offers 8 laser sessions, 16 hours of electrolysis, or a combination thereof.
  • For context, we've had over 40 hours of electrolysis (thermolysis) thus far on our face and neck with a highly-experienced (and fast) electrologist, and there are still a few stragglers.

There is a mere sliver of a fraction of a chance that we might get the NHS to fund some of our additional needs, which they don't currently provide: Individual Funding Requests (IFRs).

We're not going to sugarcoat it: the IFR route is highly likely to fail for us :FaceExhaling: Your "clinical circumstances" must be "exceptional" and the benefit clear in order to "receive benefit from a treatment or service that isn’t routinely offered by the NHS".

Even getting the EOEGS to accept that it was their responsibility to fill in any IFRs required us to contact NHS England's dedicated team for IFRs. They were not particularly happy about this.

Despite making them aware of their IFR responsibilities in March 2024, they have seemingly still not put any procedure in place for IFRs.

The doctor made notes about this during our appointment, along with our bespoke requests, and advised that he would follow this up with the first doctor involved, as well as the person in charge. (Can't remember the precise term. Service lead? Clinical lead?)

Anyway, once we've got them to fill out the bleeping IFRs, those will then be submitted to our local Integrated Care Board (ICB).

They used to be called Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), but suddenly changed the name and structure back in July 2022.

To make the structure even less clear, each ICB sits under a broader Integrated Care System (ICS).

We'll continue to share info on how it all goes, but realistically we expect all our requests to be denied, as they likely won't want to set a precedent or cough up the funding.

However, at least we'll then know that we've tried every official route we could before setting up any kind of crowdfunding campaign(s).

#NHS #NHSEngland #trans #transgender #TransFem #healthcare #TransHealthcare #EOEGS #UnionMedico #gatekeeping #vaginoplasty #PIV #PPT #orchidectomy #BofaEctomy #FFS #VFS #FacialFeminisationSurgery #VoiceFeminisationSurgery #glottoplasty #HairRemoval #ICB #ICS #IFR #IndividualFundingRequest #IntegratedCareSystem #IntegratedCareBoard #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LaserHairRemoval #LaserHairReduction #electrolysis #thermolysis #neurodivergent #neurodivergence

How can it be that this is not big news? Is it fake?

(I heard a joke on the Wider Lens Podcast, that led me to this, the only mention I can find on the web of Marci Bowers revealing her changed view of gender surgery at WPATH Lisbon, Sept 25-30, 2024.)

CW - this quote is expressed in gender critical language:

https://genspect.org/reflections-on-lisbon/
-----
That’s exactly what Marci Bowers did during the WPATH conference in Lisbon. Bowers, an AGP transwoman and president of WPATH, explained how he now recommends vulvaplasties instead of vaginoplasties as the preferred treatment option for gender dysphoric males as vaginoplasties are creating too many problems.
-----
Marci should know - she's done thousands of them.

Could this be connected? Marci is no longer WPATH president:

https://www.wpath.org/about/EC-BOD
-----
October 1, 2024
(New York City, New York) - The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) today announced that Asa Radix, MD, PhD, MPH, will begin serving as the organization's new president for a two-year term. Dr. Radix previously served as co-chair of WPATH's Standards of Care 8 working group and is a clinician and epidemiologist with expertise in transgender medicine.
-----

#vaginoplasty #vulvaplasty #MarciBowers #WPATH #Wpath_8 #Transgender #GenderPolitics

How can it be that this is not big news? Is it fake?

(I heard a joke on the Wider Lens Podcast, that led me to this, the only mention I can find on the web of Marci Bowers revealing her changed view of gender surgery at WPATH Lisbon, Sept 25-30, 2024.)

CW - this quote is expressed in gender critical language:

https://genspect.org/reflections-on-lisbon/
-----
That’s exactly what Marci Bowers did during the WPATH conference in Lisbon. Bowers, an AGP transwoman and president of WPATH, explained how he now recommends vulvaplasties instead of vaginoplasties as the preferred treatment option for gender dysphoric males as vaginoplasties are creating too many problems.
-----
Marci should know - she's done thousands of them.

Could this be connected? Marci is no longer WPATH president:

https://www.wpath.org/about/EC-BOD
-----
October 1, 2024
(New York City, New York) - The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) today announced that Asa Radix, MD, PhD, MPH, will begin serving as the organization's new president for a two-year term. Dr. Radix previously served as co-chair of WPATH's Standards of Care 8 working group and is a clinician and epidemiologist with expertise in transgender medicine.
-----

#vaginoplasty #vulvaplasty #MarciBowers #WPATH #Wpath_8 #Transgender #GenderPolitics

How can it be that this is not big news? Is it fake?

(I heard a joke on the Wider Lens Podcast, that led me to this, the only mention I can find on the web of Marci Bowers revealing her changed view of gender surgery at WPATH Lisbon, Sept 25-30, 2024.)

CW - this quote is expressed in gender critical language:

https://genspect.org/reflections-on-lisbon/
-----
That’s exactly what Marci Bowers did during the WPATH conference in Lisbon. Bowers, an AGP transwoman and president of WPATH, explained how he now recommends vulvaplasties instead of vaginoplasties as the preferred treatment option for gender dysphoric males as vaginoplasties are creating too many problems.
-----
Marci should know - she's done thousands of them.

Could this be connected? Marci is no longer WPATH president:

https://www.wpath.org/about/EC-BOD
-----
October 1, 2024
(New York City, New York) - The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) today announced that Asa Radix, MD, PhD, MPH, will begin serving as the organization's new president for a two-year term. Dr. Radix previously served as co-chair of WPATH's Standards of Care 8 working group and is a clinician and epidemiologist with expertise in transgender medicine.
-----

#vaginoplasty #vulvaplasty #MarciBowers #WPATH #Wpath_8 #Transgender #GenderPolitics

Hey folks

Although a number of trans folks, especially trans fems, do document their transitions, especially surgeries, we feel like we don't talk as much about our own individual reasons for wanting / needing vaginoplasty, whether or not we're able to get it.

We're acutely aware of the many issues surrounding vaginoplasty, including (but not limited to):

• the cost (especially where there's no socialised or nationalised healthcare systems);
• gatekeeping (such as BMI, despite it not being an indicator of positive outcomes for any gender-affirming surgeries or additional requirements not faced by cis folks);
• waiting times;
• availability of different methods / options;
• availability of expert surgeons;
• the hidden costs involved in the long recovery from surgery where you cannot work;

... and probably many more things besides.

Consequently, many who want / need surgery are unable to get it.

We'd like to ask folks who have had it already or who want / need to have it to let us know what your own personal reasons were / are :TransHeart:

Everyone's experience and feelings will be different, even if they overlap. And it's perfectly valid to not want or feel the need for vaginoplasty.

#trans #transgender #TransFem #TransWoman #TransGirl #NonBinary #enby #vaginoplasty #BottomSurgery #GenderAffirmingSurgery #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

So, we were already fortunate enough to have the senior partner at our NHS England GP surgery agree to prescribe us micronised progesterone (Utrogestan) 100 mg capsules (1 capsule daily).

Please note that NHS gender identity clinics (GICs) will typically refuse to prescribe micronised progesterone themselves to trans patients.

Anyways, we had a follow up call with the senior partner just before lunch. We asked him to up the dosage to 200 mg daily... and he agreed without any issues 😲

We asked him if, while we had him on the phone, we could quickly discuss another sensitive matter. He agreed without any hesitation.

In short, we don't actively use our "down below" stuff often, so it's all gradually shrinking. That'd be fine in theory, except that the main type of vaginoplasty available basically requires you to have a certain amount of material available 🥺

As such, we asked if there were any meds he could prescribe to help us with, erm, "maintenance" 😅😳 The common ones are sildenafil (Viagra) or tadalafil (Cialis).

Again, rather surprisingly, he agreed to prescribe us 4x 50 mg sildenafil monthly to help with this 🤯

This really goes to show how helpful it can be to go directly to the GP surgery's practice manager and ask them to discuss trans matters directly with the senior partner(s), rather than going through the lottery of individual GPs.

Hope that this info helps someone :TransHeart:​

#trans #transgender #TransJoy #HRT #GenderAffirmingCare #progesterone #vaginoplasty #TransFem #queer #LGBT+ #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+ #LGBTQIA2S+ #NHS #NHSEngland

Prior to today's appt., I'd pre-emptively got this info:

* Peritoneal pull-through (#PPT) #vaginoplasty is not currently commissioned by NHS England, but Tina Rashid does do it privately.
* Individual Funding Requests (IFRs) for gender-affirming surgeries not commissioned by NHS England should be submitted by the EOEGS to the local Integrated Care Board (#ICB).

It proved to be very useful for my appt., where GICs often get confused over their responsibilities.

2/

I got answers back from Tina Rashid's private secretary.

Including all fees, the private cost of PPT vaginoplasty is currently £37,120 GBP.

As far as they're aware, NHS England hasn't commissioned PPT, which is why it's not available yet via the NHS 🤦‍♀️

#PPT #vaginoplasty #surgery #NHS #GIC #trans #transgender #transition #TransFem #TinaRashid #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

I got answers back from Tina Rashid's private secretary.

Including all fees, the private cost of PPT vaginoplasty is currently £37,120 GBP.

As far as they're aware, NHS England hasn't commissioned PPT, which is why it's not available yet via the NHS 🤦‍♀️

#PPT #vaginoplasty #surgery #NHS #GIC #trans #transgender #transition #TransFem #TinaRashid #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+

I raised a query FAO Tina Rashid, a surgeon who performs PPT at Parkside Hospital (Nuffield Health), to confirm whether peritoneal pull-through (#PPT) #vaginoplasty is available for NHS patients referred via a gender identity clinic.

The answer?

"peritoneal pull-through is not currently available to patients who are seeking surgery through NHS pathways."

Sigh :FaceExhaling:

#NHS #GIC #trans #transgender #transition #TransFem #TinaRashid #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+