home.social

#sciencepublishing — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #sciencepublishing, aggregated by home.social.

  1. How Corporations Control Scientific Knowledge

    As a biologist, I’ve watched firsthand as “Science™” replaced genuine discovery in various fields, turning once-vibrant laboratories into echo chambers of conformity. This shift isn’t merely an academic problem; it’s a public safety crisis that affects everyone, from policymakers to everyday citizens who rely on accurate, unbiased scientific information for informed decisions about their health and environment. The consequences of prioritizing brand over substance have led to policy decisions that disregard true scientific inquiry, often with devastating effects. It’s essential that we re-embrace the core principles of curiosity and critical thinking, ensuring that genuine discovery can flourish once again in the pursuit of knowledge and safety for all.

    We are living in a system where:

    • Scientists provide free labor for massive corporate publishers.
    • Corporations own the results, gatekeeping knowledge behind paywalls.
    • Everyday policies from the food we eat to the medicines we are prescribed are based on research funneled through this profit-first filter.

    What many people, including scientists, may not realize is that Robert Maxwell (father of Ghislaine Maxwell and friend of Jeffrey Epstein) perfected a parasitic model decades ago. He understood that by controlling academic journals, you control the “truth” that lawmakers and the public depend on, shaping opinions and driving agendas for personal benefit instead of genuine scientific research. This manipulation goes beyond just publications; it affects funding, favors certain studies, and can even hide important findings that could challenge the existing norms.

    We need to address the harmful impact of the “Magic Money Tree” on science and how it influences our lives by hiding important truths under financial interests that distort research results. This flawed system questions the reliability of scientific studies and misleads the public on crucial issues. By promoting stories that favor powerful financial backers, we allow important alternative views to be ignored. It’s essential to examine how these financial motives shape the information we receive and to push for a more open discussion that values diverse perspectives and bold ideas.

    👉 Read the full investigation on my Substack

    Science Unfiltered: Keeping Truth Accessible

    Independent Work Requires Independent Support

    As a scientist who has moved outside the traditional establishment to escape the “Maxwell Blueprint” and the corruption of mainstream publishing, my research is now driven by truth—not gatekeepers. I have made it my mission to keep this work public and accessible to everyone, but being a truly independent voice means I no longer have the safety net of the system I left behind.

    Currently, this project relies on a tiny, dedicated fraction of its readers. If you believe that rigorous, honest science should exist in a world that would prefer it stayed hidden, I am asking you to stand with me.

    How you can fuel this independent research:

    Make a one-time donation

    Your contribution is appreciated.

    Donate

    Make a monthly donation

    Your contribution is appreciated.

    Donate monthly

    Make a yearly donation

    Your contribution is appreciated.

    Donate yearly

    👉 Be the Algorithm: Share my articles. When you share, you help bypass the systems designed to keep this information out of sight.

  2. Another great article by @[email protected] on the current #SciencePublishing system. Don't publish with for-profit publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, et al. It's really simple. There are so many cool #PlantScience society journals. #SciPub See also: bsky.app/profile/soms...

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:c4ovrfqv6g2kwzgdkiibwrj3/post/3k52ufjtsf22z


    The one science reform we can ...

  3. In many ways this is a wasted opportunity and also a colossal loss of funds that could have been put to support far better models of #sciencepublishing #openresearch #DiamondOpenAccessPublishing cut APC costs and wean people away from commercial scientific publishers...
    #openscience

    #India takes out giant nationwide subscription to 13,000 journals | Science | AAAS science.org/content/article/in

  4. Warum wir den Hirsch-Index (#HIndex) für die vergleichende #Evaluation von Publikationsleistungen nicht mitberücksichtigen – und noch einiges mehr zu den Hintergründen unserer Publikationsvergleiche: laborjournal.de/editorials/299 #Bibliometrics #SciencePublishing #Citations