#arstechnica — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #arstechnica, aggregated by home.social.
-
🔴 Les enjeux des lunettes intelligentes du point de vue de la confidentialité
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/meta-ai-glasses-may-get-creepier-and-apps-that-detect-them-arent-perfect/
#tech #arstechnica #lunettes #IA #AI #Meta #confidentialité #vieprivée #législation #Zuckoff #apps #iOS #Apple #Microsoft #Android #EFF #LED #caméra #Bluetooth #AirTags #Google -
Oh dear 🥵
> While the overall trend in hot weather is well known, the hourly details matter. They highlight that the number of hot hours is increasing even faster than the number of hot days, for example. But the details also help us better represent what this means for human health.
The researchers write, “As heat risks continue to intensify, hourly-scale assessments will become essential for anticipating health impacts, informing equitable adaptation strategies and designing responsive early warning systems that reflect the new reality of round-the-clock heat exposure.”
#arstechnica #globalwarming
#heatwave #heatwaves
#heatexposure #heatresearch
#globalheating #globalnews
#environmentalconcerns -
Ars Technica: Editor’s Note: Retraction of article containing fabricated quotations. “That this happened at Ars is especially distressing. We have covered the risks of overreliance on AI tools for years, and our written policy reflects those concerns. In this case, fabricated quotations were published in a manner inconsistent with that policy. We have reviewed recent work and have not […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/16/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations-ars-technica/ -
You may have seen the story this week about an "AI" (LLM) bot that opened a pull request against the Python #matplotlib library. When the request was closed, the story was that the #bot posted aggressive condemnations of the maintainer(s) in the thread, particularly Scott Shambaugh, and then posted an article to a blog attacking him.
There's a lot of speculation about how much of that action was driven algorithmically vs manually instructed by the bot operator.
Anyway, so far so interesting. Lots of online media coverage of it, because it was novel.
But then, Ars Technica published an article about it. And Shambaugh read it, and posted that the second half of the article contained alleged quotes from him that he never said. The article appears to have been "AI"-generated, without any acknowledgement of that fact, which is not good for Ars' credibility.
Worse, Ars then quickly pulled the #article - silently. No mention of it left, no #apology to Shambaugh, no note to the readers of what they'd done.
That is absolutely #unethical in #journalism. It is unforgivable.
Ars was once a technical site with additional coverage of science and other geek-adjacent topics. Then it went commercial, was bought by a huge publishing conglomerate, and became a lot less technical.
But this is a slide too far. Unless they fix this, quick, I won't renew my subscription.
Mirror of yanked article:
https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie