home.social

#starliner — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #starliner, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. @NASASpaceflight

    Things are starting to feel a bit more positive about Starliner which is set for a potential 2026 cargo run to the ISS.

    Written by Martijn Luinstra & Chris Bergin

    nasaspaceflight.com/2026/08/bo

    #Starliner #NASA

  2. @NASASpaceflight

    Things are starting to feel a bit more positive about Starliner which is set for a potential 2026 cargo run to the ISS.

    Written by Martijn Luinstra & Chris Bergin

    nasaspaceflight.com/2026/08/bo

    #Starliner #NASA

  3. @NASASpaceflight

    Things are starting to feel a bit more positive about Starliner which is set for a potential 2026 cargo run to the ISS.

    Written by Martijn Luinstra & Chris Bergin

    nasaspaceflight.com/2026/08/bo

    #NASA #Boeing #Starliner live as an alternative to Starship whenever Elon kill Dragon

    7/21/26

    #SpaceX #ISS2.0

  4. @NASASpaceflight

    Things are starting to feel a bit more positive about Starliner which is set for a potential 2026 cargo run to the ISS.

    Written by Martijn Luinstra & Chris Bergin

    nasaspaceflight.com/2026/08/bo

    #NASA #Boeing #Starliner live as an alternative to Starship whenever Elon kill Dragon

    7/21/26

    #SpaceX #ISS2.0

  5. "Starliner might fly into space this year" by @arstechnica / @sciguyspace - #Boeing CEO answered media questions about #Starliner at quarterly results call. They say they've fixed the propulsion problem and are working with #NASA to schedule the next launch, which will be an uncrewed cargo delivery to/from #ISS. Scheduling of station docking ports and astronaut time to unload/load the craft are the current bottlenecks. arstechnica.com/space/2026/07/ #CommercialCrew #space

  6. "Starliner might fly into space this year" by @arstechnica / @sciguyspace - #Boeing CEO answered media questions about #Starliner at quarterly results call. They say they've fixed the propulsion problem and are working with #NASA to schedule the next launch, which will be an uncrewed cargo delivery to/from #ISS. Scheduling of station docking ports and astronaut time to unload/load the craft are the current bottlenecks. arstechnica.com/space/2026/07/ #CommercialCrew #space

  7. Starliner's Return to Flight Slips to Late 2026 as Boeing and NASA Continue Scheduling Talks

    Our best stories, delivered daily. Follow us.

    1ban.news/boeing-starliner-nex

    #1ban #boeing #starliner #next #flight #space

  8. Hate Elon Musk as much as you want, but SpaceX denial still isn’t a good look

    Last week’s catastrophic explosion of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket didn’t just incinerate that heavy-lift launch system and much of its support infrastructure at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station’s Launch Complex 36; it also sparked a new round of Space Billionaire Schadenfreude.

    Which is understandable. Blue Origin CEO Jeff Bezos may not have groveled for President Trump’s favor as obsequiously as such fellow tech CEOs as Apple’s Tim Cook or Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, but he seems more than content to be seen in Trump’s corner. And around my city, Bezos has richly earned D.C.’s contempt for his incompetent lackeys’ wanton dismantling of the Washington Post.

    But Bezos is nowhere near the worst space billionaire. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to convince voters to return the worst president to office, oversaw the DOGE ransacking of large parts of the federal government, and continues to exploit his overlordship of X to broadcast racist, misogynistic, transphobic, antisemitic and Islamophobic garbage while amplifying some of the stupidest people on the Internet.

    Musk’s accumulation and abuse of economic and political power far exceeds Bezos’s and strikes me as much more dangerous. So my first reaction to Blue’s bad day, after sympathy for engineers who saw years of work go up in a fiery mushroom cloud, was that it represents an unfortunate setback to competition for Musk’s space company on multiple levels, from inflight WiFi to landing astronauts on the Moon. I wrote as much at PCMag and, in compressed form, on Bluesky.

    I should have known the reaction that post would get: people bashing not only Blue Origin but also SpaceX and the entire concept of NASA inking commercial contracts to send astronauts to space. Each mishap of SpaceX’s Starship rocket–I have written up every launch of that heavy-lift vehicle in my unofficial role as a PCMag space scribe–reliably generates comments along those lines, suggesting that not only is Starship a doomed design but that SpaceX is a failing exercise in crony capitalism.

    That sentiment seems to be widely felt. And it’s nonsense.

    Fact: SpaceX’s partly reusable Falcon 9–the core of its launch business, the vehicle on which customers from NASA to would-be rivals to SpaceX’s Starlink keep buying rides–is one of the most reliable rockets ever made.

    Per the count at Wikipedia, out of 644 Falcon 9 launches through Thursday, only three have failed to deliver a payload to the right orbit; just one has ended with the loss of a rocket and payload. Only United Launch Alliance’s soon-to-be-retired Atlas V can beat that among launch vehicles with more than 100 liftoffs. The Space Shuttle, as much as I loved seeing it fly, was nowhere near that safe.

    SpaceX also deserves credit for terminating a Russian monopoly on crew transport to and from the International Space Station with the Falcon 9-launched Crew Dragon capsule. NASA privatizing that role, years after SpaceX successfully took on delivering supplies to the ISS with the cargo version of Dragon pictured above, stands as an extraordinary accomplishment for the agency.

    And yet the Obama administration struggled to sell that notion to Congress 14 years ago; many legislators, leery of a startup proposing to fly even cargo to the ISS, wanted NASA to give all that business to Boeing. Instead, that aerospace giant won one of two commercial-crew awards, and now Boeing’s Starliner capsule has yet be certified for crewed missions six years after Crew Dragon’s debut with astronauts strapped in.

    To opine as if this history didn’t happen in public view–or to suggest that NASA could have procured itself an ISS crew system using the traditional contracting processes that yielded the Space Launch System’s years of delay and billions of dollars in cost overruns–is to exhibit a MAGA level of denial.

    That doesn’t mean I have the same confidence in SpaceX developing a version of Starship’s upper stage as a Human Landing System for NASA’s Artemis missions to the Moon. More than three years after Starship’s failed debut–followed by 11 more launches that have yet to reach orbit–Starship looks a little star-crossed. I imagine that people at NASA now wonder where we might be if SpaceX had proposed a simpler, smaller lander that could fly on the Falcon 9-derived Falcon Heavy system that NASA already trusts for some of its most important robotic planetary missions.

    And yet with New Glenn grounded until at least the end of this year, probably longer, NASA now needs the complex Starship HLS concept to work more than ever. If you would rather not have the next words spoken from the lunar surface be in Mandarin, this should not be a confidence-inducing scenario.

    But asking nuanced questions–about whether SpaceX is aiming too high with Starship, if Musk has lost his focus from spending too much time engaging with sycophantic superfans on X, or if recent minor issues with Falcon 9 launches suggest SpaceX is nearing its speed limit for aggressive iteration–clearly can’t be as exciting as posting hot takes on social media.

    #AmazonLeo #Artemis #BlueOrigin #Boeing #ElonMusk #Falcon9 #hotTakes #InternationalSpaceStation #ISS #JeffBezos #nasa #NewGlenn #newSpace #SpaceX #Starliner #Starlink #Starship
  9. Hate Elon Musk as much as you want, but SpaceX denial still isn’t a good look

    Last week’s catastrophic explosion of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket didn’t just incinerate that heavy-lift launch system and much of its support infrastructure at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station’s Launch Complex 36; it also sparked a new round of Space Billionaire Schadenfreude.

    Which is understandable. Blue Origin CEO Jeff Bezos may not have groveled for President Trump’s favor as obsequiously as such fellow tech CEOs as Apple’s Tim Cook or Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, but he seems more than content to be seen in Trump’s corner. And around my city, Bezos has richly earned D.C.’s contempt for his incompetent lackeys’ wanton dismantling of the Washington Post.

    But Bezos is nowhere near the worst space billionaire. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to convince voters to return the worst president to office, oversaw the DOGE ransacking of large parts of the federal government, and continues to exploit his overlordship of X to broadcast racist, misogynistic, transphobic, antisemitic and Islamophobic garbage while amplifying some of the stupidest people on the Internet.

    Musk’s accumulation and abuse of economic and political power far exceeds Bezos’s and strikes me as much more dangerous. So my first reaction to Blue’s bad day, after sympathy for engineers who saw years of work go up in a fiery mushroom cloud, was that it represents an unfortunate setback to competition for Musk’s space company on multiple levels, from inflight WiFi to landing astronauts on the Moon. I wrote as much at PCMag and, in compressed form, on Bluesky.

    I should have known the reaction that post would get: people bashing not only Blue Origin but also SpaceX and the entire concept of NASA inking commercial contracts to send astronauts to space. Each mishap of SpaceX’s Starship rocket–I have written up every launch of that heavy-lift vehicle in my unofficial role as a PCMag space scribe–reliably generates comments along those lines, suggesting that not only is Starship a doomed design but that SpaceX is a failing exercise in crony capitalism.

    That sentiment seems to be widely felt. And it’s nonsense.

    Fact: SpaceX’s partly reusable Falcon 9–the core of its launch business, the vehicle on which customers from NASA to would-be rivals to SpaceX’s Starlink keep buying rides–is one of the most reliable rockets ever made.

    Per the count at Wikipedia, out of 644 Falcon 9 launches through Thursday, only three have failed to deliver a payload to the right orbit; just one has ended with the loss of a rocket and payload. Only United Launch Alliance’s soon-to-be-retired Atlas V can beat that among launch vehicles with more than 100 liftoffs. The Space Shuttle, as much as I loved seeing it fly, was nowhere near that safe.

    SpaceX also deserves credit for terminating a Russian monopoly on crew transport to and from the International Space Station with the Falcon 9-launched Crew Dragon capsule. NASA privatizing that role, years after SpaceX successfully took on delivering supplies to the ISS with the cargo version of Dragon pictured above, stands as an extraordinary accomplishment for the agency.

    And yet the Obama administration struggled to sell that notion to Congress 14 years ago; many legislators, leery of a startup proposing to fly even cargo to the ISS, wanted NASA to give all that business to Boeing. Instead, that aerospace giant won one of two commercial-crew awards, and now Boeing’s Starliner capsule has yet be certified for crewed missions six years after Crew Dragon’s debut with astronauts strapped in.

    To opine as if this history didn’t happen in public view–or to suggest that NASA could have procured itself an ISS crew system using the traditional contracting processes that yielded the Space Launch System’s years of delay and billions of dollars in cost overruns–is to exhibit a MAGA level of denial.

    That doesn’t mean I have the same confidence in SpaceX developing a version of Starship’s upper stage as a Human Landing System for NASA’s Artemis missions to the Moon. More than three years after Starship’s failed debut–followed by 11 more launches that have yet to reach orbit–Starship looks a little star-crossed. I imagine that people at NASA now wonder where we might be if SpaceX had proposed a simpler, smaller lander that could fly on the Falcon 9-derived Falcon Heavy system that NASA already trusts for some of its most important robotic planetary missions.

    And yet with New Glenn grounded until at least the end of this year, probably longer, NASA now needs the complex Starship HLS concept to work more than ever. If you would rather not have the next words spoken from the lunar surface be in Mandarin, this should not be a confidence-inducing scenario.

    But asking nuanced questions–about whether SpaceX is aiming too high with Starship, if Musk has lost his focus from spending too much time engaging with sycophantic superfans on X, or if recent minor issues with Falcon 9 launches suggest SpaceX is nearing its speed limit for aggressive iteration–clearly can’t be as exciting as posting hot takes on social media.

    #AmazonLeo #Artemis #BlueOrigin #Boeing #ElonMusk #Falcon9 #hotTakes #InternationalSpaceStation #ISS #JeffBezos #nasa #NewGlenn #newSpace #SpaceX #Starliner #Starlink #Starship
  10. 🛰️ La NASA a reporté la mission #Starliner-1, nouveau vol de démonstration sans équipage du vaisseau de Boeing, de juin 2026 à « en cours d'examen » dans son calendrier interne.
    Cela pourrait présager un report à 2027.

  11. 🛰️ La NASA a reporté la mission #Starliner-1, nouveau vol de démonstration sans équipage du vaisseau de Boeing, de juin 2026 à « en cours d'examen » dans son calendrier interne.
    Cela pourrait présager un report à 2027.

  12. #space #starliner

    Boeing Starliner : Butch Wilmore Shares Exactly What Happened As He Piloted Starliner

    youtube.com/watch?v=7EUk2WdxSSk

  13. #space #starliner

    Boeing Starliner : Butch Wilmore Shares Exactly What Happened As He Piloted Starliner

    youtube.com/watch?v=7EUk2WdxSSk

  14. @spaceincnews.com

    Starliner and Artemis: commercial label vs. commercial discipline

    #NASA’s Commercial Crew Program was supposed to be the template: services-based procurement, private ownership of hardware and competition between providers. Yet NASA has now formally designated Boeing’s 2024 #Starliner crewed test…

    spacenews.com/impulse-space-ex

  15. @spaceincnews.com

    Starliner and Artemis: commercial label vs. commercial discipline

    #NASA’s Commercial Crew Program was supposed to be the template: services-based procurement, private ownership of hardware and competition between providers. Yet NASA has now formally designated Boeing’s 2024 #Starliner crewed test…

    spacenews.com/impulse-space-ex

  16. also from #TheCrux - "NASA released the Starliner Propulsion System Anomalies during the Crewed Flight Test - investigation report last week. It has redactions, but there’s a lot left in.

    As reported in #SpaceNews, #NASA Administrator Jared #Isaacman had some blunt words to share during a press conference:

    #Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware. It’s decision-making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.”

    Politely phrased, but big oof.
    agreed @daedalus

    spacenews.com/starliner-invest

  17. also from #TheCrux - "NASA released the Starliner Propulsion System Anomalies during the Crewed Flight Test - investigation report last week. It has redactions, but there’s a lot left in.

    As reported in #SpaceNews, #NASA Administrator Jared #Isaacman had some blunt words to share during a press conference:

    #Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware. It’s decision-making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.”

    Politely phrased, but big oof.
    agreed @daedalus

    spacenews.com/starliner-invest

  18. 👩‍🚀 NASA says Boeing, leadership to blame for Starliner

    「 Organizationally, NASA concluded, it was too hands-off on Starliner's development, Boeing was too reliant on subcontractors and had inadequate systems engineering, and the CCP was more focused on Starliner's success than ensuring that the craft was safe 」

    theregister.com/2026/02/19/nas

    #nasa #starliner #boeing #space

  19. 👩‍🚀 NASA says Boeing, leadership to blame for Starliner

    「 Organizationally, NASA concluded, it was too hands-off on Starliner's development, Boeing was too reliant on subcontractors and had inadequate systems engineering, and the CCP was more focused on Starliner's success than ensuring that the craft was safe 」

    theregister.com/2026/02/19/nas

    #nasa #starliner #boeing #space

  20. Weekly output: social-media cleanup, Verizon’s phone-unlock waiting period, NASA’s Starliner report

    This will be a travel-abbreviated workweek: Friday afternoon, I head to Dulles to start my journey to Spain for MWC Barcelona, still one of my favorite reasons to get on a plane for business. I’ll be there until March 5, so the next few days would be an excellent time to hit me up with any questions you have about the future of the wireless industry.

    Meanwhile, Patreon readers got a bonus post from me this week about my continued struggles with my home WiFi, in which trying to pick out a good mesh-network option has required wrestling with unexpected national-security concerns.

    2/17/2026: Social-media cleanses, Al Jazeera

    The Arabic-language news channel had me in studio to offer some perspective about people implicated in the Epstein files trying to cleanse their social-media history. I said that if you’re sufficiently prominent, the Internet doesn’t forget things.

    2/18/2026: Paid Off Your Phone Early? Verizon to Ease 35-Day Hold to Unlock It, PCMag

    Four days after Ars Technica’s Jon Brodkin reported that Verizon had begun requiring a 35-day waiting period to complete unlocking a phone paid off early (unless you made that payment in one of Verizon’s own stores with cash or a credit card’s chip or tap-to-pay options), I asked Verizon for comment. Hours later, I got a statement that the company was working to allow online payments to qualify for an immediate unlock–and then Verizon didn’t give Brodkin the same statement.

    2/20/2026: Unpacking Starliner Failures, NASA Chief Delivers Scathing Assessment, PCMag

    While I was at a space-industry conference in Tysons Thursday, NASA announced the findings of an investigation into everything that went wrong with Boeing’s Starliner crew capsule after its first and still only launch with astronauts aboard. So instead of writing up one of the panels at this event, I started reading the agency’s 311-page report, hit up Boeing PR for a comment and got in a call with a longtime observer and critic of NASA. Then I spent more of Friday than I’d planned on writing this post.

    #ArsTechnica #Barcelona #Boeing #EpsteinFiles #JaredIsaacman #JonBrodkin #MWC #nasa #phoneUnlocking #rightToBeForgotten #socialMediaPosts #Starliner #verizon
  21. Weekly output: social-media cleanup, Verizon’s phone-unlock waiting period, NASA’s Starliner report

    This will be a travel-abbreviated workweek: Friday afternoon, I head to Dulles to start my journey to Spain for MWC Barcelona, still one of my favorite reasons to get on a plane for business. I’ll be there until March 5, so the next few days would be an excellent time to hit me up with any questions you have about the future of the wireless industry.

    Meanwhile, Patreon readers got a bonus post from me this week about my continued struggles with my home WiFi, in which trying to pick out a good mesh-network option has required wrestling with unexpected national-security concerns.

    2/17/2026: Social-media cleanses, Al Jazeera

    The Arabic-language news channel had me in studio to offer some perspective about people implicated in the Epstein files trying to cleanse their social-media history. I said that if you’re sufficiently prominent, the Internet doesn’t forget things.

    2/18/2026: Paid Off Your Phone Early? Verizon to Ease 35-Day Hold to Unlock It, PCMag

    Four days after Ars Technica’s Jon Brodkin reported that Verizon had begun requiring a 35-day waiting period to complete unlocking a phone paid off early (unless you made that payment in one of Verizon’s own stores with cash or a credit card’s chip or tap-to-pay options), I asked Verizon for comment. Hours later, I got a statement that the company was working to allow online payments to qualify for an immediate unlock–and then Verizon didn’t give Brodkin the same statement.

    2/20/2026: Unpacking Starliner Failures, NASA Chief Delivers Scathing Assessment, PCMag

    While I was at a space-industry conference in Tysons Thursday, NASA announced the findings of an investigation into everything that went wrong with Boeing’s Starliner crew capsule after its first and still only launch with astronauts aboard. So instead of writing up one of the panels at this event, I started reading the agency’s 311-page report, hit up Boeing PR for a comment and got in a call with a longtime observer and critic of NASA. Then I spent more of Friday than I’d planned on writing this post.

    #ArsTechnica #Barcelona #Boeing #EpsteinFiles #JaredIsaacman #JonBrodkin #MWC #nasa #phoneUnlocking #rightToBeForgotten #socialMediaPosts #Starliner #verizon
  22. Report der Untersuchung des bemannten Starliner Testflugs von NASA veröffentlicht
    Auf einer Pressekonferenz am Donnerstag veröffentlichte die NASA einen Bericht mit den Ergebnissen des Program Investigation Teams, das den bemannten Testflug des Boeing CST-100 Starliner im Rahmen des Commercial Crew Program der Behörde untersucht hatte. Pressemitteilung NASA. #Starliner
    raumfahrer.net/report-der-unte

  23. Report der Untersuchung des bemannten Starliner Testflugs von NASA veröffentlicht
    Auf einer Pressekonferenz am Donnerstag veröffentlichte die NASA einen Bericht mit den Ergebnissen des Program Investigation Teams, das den bemannten Testflug des Boeing CST-100 Starliner im Rahmen des Commercial Crew Program der Behörde untersucht hatte. Pressemitteilung NASA. #Starliner
    raumfahrer.net/report-der-unte

  24. NASA Reports Serious Safety Issues in Starliner CFT Crewed Mission

    📰 Original title: Misión Starliner CFT: un grave Incidente de Tipo A

    🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
    👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

    View full AI summary: killbait.com/en/nasa-reports-s

    #astronomy #starliner #nasa #boeing

  25. NASA Reports Serious Safety Issues in Starliner CFT Crewed Mission

    📰 Original title: Misión Starliner CFT: un grave Incidente de Tipo A

    🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
    👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

    View full AI summary: killbait.com/en/nasa-reports-s

    #astronomy #starliner #nasa #boeing

  26. El informe de la NASA señala graves fallos de gestión y seguridad en la misión tripulada Starliner CFT

    📰 Título original: Misión Starliner CFT: un grave Incidente de Tipo A

    🤖 IA: No es clickbait ✅
    👥 Usuarios: No es clickbait ✅

    Ver resumen IA completo: killbait.com/es/el-informe-de-

    #astronomía #starliner

  27. @NASAAdmin

    Below is the note that I sent to the #NASA workforce today as we release the report on the #Starliner Crew Flight Test Investigation.

    We will achieve success through extreme ownership, immense competence, and decisive action.

    x.com/nasaadmin/status/2024558

    2/19/26

  28. @NASAAdmin

    Below is the note that I sent to the #NASA workforce today as we release the report on the #Starliner Crew Flight Test Investigation.

    We will achieve success through extreme ownership, immense competence, and decisive action.

    x.com/nasaadmin/status/2024558

    2/19/26

  29. "There was yelling in meetings. It was emotionally charged and #unproductive". Agency officials' concerns that #Boeing could drop out of #NASA's Commercial Crew Program influenced officials' decision-making on #critical mission issues. If previous Admins had done same, #safety & public #trust would be higher," #LoriGarver said of #Isaacman's decision to release the report reuters.com/business/aerospace

    #Starliner

  30. "There was yelling in meetings. It was emotionally charged and #unproductive". Agency officials' concerns that #Boeing could drop out of #NASA's Commercial Crew Program influenced officials' decision-making on #critical mission issues. If previous Admins had done same, #safety & public #trust would be higher," #LoriGarver said of #Isaacman's decision to release the report reuters.com/business/aerospace

    #Starliner

  31. 🛰️✨ Le 19 février, la NASA a publié un rapport concernant l'investigation menée par un comité indépendant après le premier vol habité du vaisseau #Starliner vers l'ISS en 2024. Et ce rapport critique vivement la direction de la NASA et de Boeing.

    La suite : reves-d-espace.com/echec-du-pr

  32. 🛰️✨ Le 19 février, la NASA a publié un rapport concernant l'investigation menée par un comité indépendant après le premier vol habité du vaisseau #Starliner vers l'ISS en 2024. Et ce rapport critique vivement la direction de la NASA et de Boeing.

    La suite : reves-d-espace.com/echec-du-pr

  33. RE: social.heise.de/@heiseonlineen

    #Wilmore had already admitted that the problems were more massive than previously known. He stated that he could no longer control 🕹️ the spacecraft properly before the docking attempt.

    #Starliner #Boeing #NASA #ISS #HumanSpaceflightSecurity

  34. RE: social.heise.de/@heiseonlineen

    #Wilmore had already admitted that the problems were more massive than previously known. He stated that he could no longer control 🕹️ the spacecraft properly before the docking attempt.

    #Starliner #Boeing #NASA #ISS #HumanSpaceflightSecurity

  35. @NASASpaceflight

    Join us 🔴LIVE🔴 today, February 20th, at 5:00 p.m. EST / 22:00 UTC in The Flame Trench, our weekly show, where we discuss all the recent space news, and developments in the space industry!
    youtube.com/watch?v=pMavRmCADs0

    #nasa #spacex #boeing #artemis2 #wdr2 #starliner 🙄 #otd 2/20

  36. @NASASpaceflight

    Join us 🔴LIVE🔴 today, February 20th, at 5:00 p.m. EST / 22:00 UTC in The Flame Trench, our weekly show, where we discuss all the recent space news, and developments in the space industry!
    youtube.com/watch?v=pMavRmCADs0

    #nasa #spacex #boeing #artemis2 #wdr2 #starliner 🙄 #otd 2/20

  37. @WinFuture Es macht überhaupt keinen Sinn, reflexartig (nur) auf Boeing zu zeigen. Die NASA war durchaus ... beteiligt ...

    #Boeing #NASA #Raumfahrt #SpaceFlight #Starliner

  38. @WinFuture Es macht überhaupt keinen Sinn, reflexartig (nur) auf Boeing zu zeigen. Die NASA war durchaus ... beteiligt ...

    #Boeing #NASA #Raumfahrt #SpaceFlight #Starliner

  39. Die #NASA stuft #Starliner-Flug als "Typ-A-Zwischenfall" ein - die höchste Gefahrenstufe, wie bei den Shuttle-Tragödien. Der Abschlussbericht zeichnet ein vernichtendes Bild von Boeings Unternehmenskultur. winfuture.de/news,156989.html?

  40. Die #NASA stuft #Starliner-Flug als "Typ-A-Zwischenfall" ein - die höchste Gefahrenstufe, wie bei den Shuttle-Tragödien. Der Abschlussbericht zeichnet ein vernichtendes Bild von Boeings Unternehmenskultur. winfuture.de/news,156989.html?

  41. #UniverseToday:
    "
    Report blames NASA and Boeing for Starliner screw-ups
    "
    "Nearly two years after Boeing’s botched Starliner mission to the International Space Station, NASA put the mishap in the same category as the Challenger and Columbia space shuttle disasters — and said the spacecraft wouldn’t carry another crew until dozens of corrective actions are taken."

    cosmiclog.com/2026/02/19/nasa-

    19.2.2026

    #Boeing #NASA #Raumfahrt #SpaceFlight #Starliner

  42. #UniverseToday:
    "
    Report blames NASA and Boeing for Starliner screw-ups
    "
    "Nearly two years after Boeing’s botched Starliner mission to the International Space Station, NASA put the mishap in the same category as the Challenger and Columbia space shuttle disasters — and said the spacecraft wouldn’t carry another crew until dozens of corrective actions are taken."

    cosmiclog.com/2026/02/19/nasa-

    19.2.2026

    #Boeing #NASA #Raumfahrt #SpaceFlight #Starliner

  43. #NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman responds to an independent panel's report on 2024's troubled #Starliner mission by putting the event in the agency's most serious category of anomalies - and declaring that astronauts won't ride on Starliners until corrective actions are taken. The report faults NASA as well as #Boeing ... cosmiclog.com/2026/02/19/nasa- #Space #ISS

  44. #NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman responds to an independent panel's report on 2024's troubled #Starliner mission by putting the event in the agency's most serious category of anomalies - and declaring that astronauts won't ride on Starliners until corrective actions are taken. The report faults NASA as well as #Boeing ... cosmiclog.com/2026/02/19/nasa- #Space #ISS

  45. NASA chief slams Boeing, agency failures in Starliner mission

    NASA chief Jared Isaacman ripped into Boeing and agency leadership for their handling of the botched Starliner spacecraft mission that left two astronauts stuck on the International Space Station for nearly a year. #nasa #starliner #space #internationalspacestation #iss #News #Reuters #Newsfeed Read the story here: 👉 Subscribe: Keep up with the latest news from around the world: Follow Reuters on Facebook:…

    fllics.com/en/video/nasa-chief