#p92 — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #p92, aggregated by home.social.
-
🗓️03/11/25 au 09/11/25 (1/3) : Accident survenu au @tecnam #P92 identifié 86SN le 04/11/2025 à #Poitiers / Collision avec le sol, lors de la montée initiale. Enquête @BEA_Aero
https://bea.aero/les-enquetes/evenements-notifies/detail/accident-survenu-au-tecnam-p92-identifie-86sn-le-04-11-2025-a-ad-poitiers-biard-86/ -
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-1/
Since #Facebook/#Meta is apparently going to start testing #Fediverse/#Mastodon integration for their #P92/#Barcelona/#Threads “platform” soon, let's do another round of reminders of what this entails and why their instance and IPs should be blocked *now* with extreme prejudice.
#fediblock #defederateMeta #defederateBarcelona #defederateThreads
-
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-1/
Since #Facebook/#Meta is apparently going to start testing #Fediverse/#Mastodon integration for their #P92/#Barcelona/#Threads “platform” soon, let's do another round of reminders of what this entails and why their instance and IPs should be blocked *now* with extreme prejudice.
#fediblock #defederateMeta #defederateBarcelona #defederateThreads
-
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-1/
Since #Facebook/#Meta is apparently going to start testing #Fediverse/#Mastodon integration for their #P92/#Barcelona/#Threads “platform” soon, let's do another round of reminders of what this entails and why their instance and IPs should be blocked *now* with extreme prejudice.
#fediblock #defederateMeta #defederateBarcelona #defederateThreads
-
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-1/
Since #Facebook/#Meta is apparently going to start testing #Fediverse/#Mastodon integration for their #P92/#Barcelona/#Threads “platform” soon, let's do another round of reminders of what this entails and why their instance and IPs should be blocked *now* with extreme prejudice.
#fediblock #defederateMeta #defederateBarcelona #defederateThreads
-
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/credible-threat-1/
Since #Facebook/#Meta is apparently going to start testing #Fediverse/#Mastodon integration for their #P92/#Barcelona/#Threads “platform” soon, let's do another round of reminders of what this entails and why their instance and IPs should be blocked *now* with extreme prejudice.
#fediblock #defederateMeta #defederateBarcelona #defederateThreads
-
After more than 2 weeks of work, the official #lemmy instance of utopify.org is online: https://lemmy.utopify.org/
It took way to much time, but I wanted to be sure it is the right thing and that everything works even better than before in the old utopify.org guild chat on #habitica And after a lots of struggles, it looks like it is usable, now.
The new lemmy instance covers topics like #selfdevelopment and #sustainability and everything what is connected to it. I will create a lot of communities the next weeks and almost every #challenge I provided on Habitica will be accessible publicly there, too. (And I will announce them on Mastodon).
It should be a safe space to focus on important topics and define fulfilling goals, create a habit to work on them and to reach them in an efficient way, even if the "All Feed" is activated, which can be distracting very fast, because it shows federated posts. I recommend to stay in the "Local Feed".
I've put so much energy, time and money in a self-hosted Lemmy instance, because what happened on Habitica was the last time that a company will be able to destroy the utopify community.
We had a healthy routine to set goals, have a sustainable mindset, motivate and inspire others and all was gone within a short time. This time the plan is, that it will stay for much much longer and that all experience will be saved and can be shared by everyone :)
The Lemmy instance is free of GAFAM spyware (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft) or any trackers/ads and it runs on a private server and WE DON'T FEDERATE WITH #META (#threads, #project92, #p92)
If you want to support utopify.org, you can do this over liberapay: https://liberapay.com/utopify.org
Every cent is appreciated and helps to keep everything running :)
-
-
DE: "Eine Teenagerin aus Nebraska, die mit Hilfe ihrer Mutter #Abtreibungspille|n besorgte und damit gegen staatliches #Recht verstieß, wurde zu 90 Tagen #Gefängnis verurteilt." (Rolling Stone, 2023-07-21)
Leider erwähnt dieses Abstract nicht deutlich genug, dass #Facebook / #Meta an den Ermittlungen maßgeblich beteiligt war.
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #GOP #Nebraska #Denunziantentum
-
DE: "Eine Teenagerin aus Nebraska, die mit Hilfe ihrer Mutter #Abtreibungspille|n besorgte und damit gegen staatliches #Recht verstieß, wurde zu 90 Tagen #Gefängnis verurteilt." (Rolling Stone, 2023-07-21)
Leider erwähnt dieses Abstract nicht deutlich genug, dass #Facebook / #Meta an den Ermittlungen maßgeblich beteiligt war.
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #GOP #Nebraska #Denunziantentum
-
DE: "Eine Teenagerin aus Nebraska, die mit Hilfe ihrer Mutter #Abtreibungspille|n besorgte und damit gegen staatliches #Recht verstieß, wurde zu 90 Tagen #Gefängnis verurteilt." (Rolling Stone, 2023-07-21)
Leider erwähnt dieses Abstract nicht deutlich genug, dass #Facebook / #Meta an den Ermittlungen maßgeblich beteiligt war.
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #GOP #Nebraska #Denunziantentum
-
DE: "Eine Teenagerin aus Nebraska, die mit Hilfe ihrer Mutter #Abtreibungspille|n besorgte und damit gegen staatliches #Recht verstieß, wurde zu 90 Tagen #Gefängnis verurteilt." (Rolling Stone, 2023-07-21)
Leider erwähnt dieses Abstract nicht deutlich genug, dass #Facebook / #Meta an den Ermittlungen maßgeblich beteiligt war.
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #GOP #Nebraska #Denunziantentum
-
And even more confirmations.
https://www.threads.net/@threadsapp/post/Cu2TLZHLvA4
https://creators.instagram.com/blog/introducing-threads
It’s basically the same slides but on a website.
#meta #threadsapp #project92 #p92 #barcelona #instagram #blockmeta #threads -
I didn’t see anyone report on this, but a 13 slides deck about #meta #threadApp ’s future plans has leaked.
And guess what you can find at the slide 11.... Mastodon compatibility confirmed again.
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-instagram-threads-document-shows-upcoming-features-2023-7 (Pay walled)
(this post contains 13 webp pictures, open the post on calckey.social if you can’t view all pictures on your instance)
#project92 #p92 #barcelona #instagram #blockmeta #threads -
CW: Threads meta, hot take, politics, sarcasm
Politicians, quick! Get your institutions to onboard on communication systems designed by monsters* who've literally designed previous products to target and abuse working class teenagers! The masses could get a free internet, so don't waste a second, and create your free account now!!
- Analysing power relationships, it makes more sense to assume billionaires to only have one value, which is to amass as much economic capital as possible, making any humanization contrary to trivial sociological common sense. (Ask me about sociological modelling!)
-
CW: What'll happen when Threads introduces ActivityPub? And will it even do so in the first place? A rant
@Fediverse News
The hottest topic in the #Fediverse right now has to be #Threads, formerly known as #P92 or #Barcelona, the alleged #Twitter killer by #Meta, and what'll happen when it federates with the rest of the Fediverse. So without further ado, here are my thoughts about this.
So why did Meta announce Threads to include #ActivityPub?
Well, it certainly wasn't because they needed a ready-to-use federation protocol. Threads itself will remain a centralised, proprietary, corporate silo with exactly one instance. I mean, when #Tumblr announced to include ActivityPub, this didn't come with the announcement that everyone will be able to run their own Tumblr instance, remember? It just meant that their silo will be able to connect to Mastodon & Co. and quit being a walled garden.
It's more likely that Threads was planned to get ActivityPub support because at least the EU is going to force online services to become interoperable in some ways. And some big corporations are growing cautious of the expected "or else!" So if Meta wants to offer Threads in the EU, Threads will have to be able to connect to something not owned by Meta. So they've decided to include ActivityPub because a) it's ready-to-use, b) it's free-to-use, c) it already has lots of projects and instances and users to connect to, d) it's something Meta has heard of, and e) it isn't Dorsey's #ATproto.
I mean, they could also have played it safe and included #OStatus just to have something they'd theoretically be able to connect to without running into nearly as many renitent netizens opposed to Meta. It'd still pass the #DigitalServicesAct. But they probably don't even know that OStatus exists.
That said, I currently wouldn't be so certain that Threads will actually add ActivityPub. It has never been Threads' unique selling-point. That'd rather be Twitter-like microblogging without Elon Musk or Jack Dorsey at the helm plus one-click registration for Instagram users. Marc Zuckerberg has never wanted to have his own Mastodon. He has always wanted to have his own Twitter. And now that the real deal is on its deathbed, he finally can.
If ActivityPub integration was actually only planned as appeasement towards the EU, it has become completely unnecessary when Threads blew a raspberry and flipped two birds at the #GDPR with its iOS app that phones all your most private data home to Threads and Instagram and Facebook to be sold to the highest bidder. Because of that, Meta is banned from offering Threads in the EU altogether. Why appease to the EU when you're banned there anyway?
So there wouldn't be any reason to be surprised if ActivityPub never came to Threads. After all, #Bluesky has talked big about decentralisation and federation and even the "invention" of #NomadicIdentity (which was actually invented in 2011 and first implemented in 2012 on Red Matrix, known as #Hubzilla today). Bluesky was announced long before Threads. Bluesky was launched long before Threads. And just like Threads, it has yet to deliver. As of now, it's just another centralised, monolithic silo, and third-party developments are the only reason why it isn't entirely a walled garden.
I guess even Jack Dorsey had to realise that it's complete non-sense to create a technological platform for decentralised social networking that's only compatible to itself, save for connectors developed by third parties without his consent. I guess he must have realised just how big and wide-spread the ActivityPub-based Fediverse is and how rapidly it's growing. Decentralising Bluesky now would be like introducing a replacement for e-mail that's completely incompatible with e-mail itself.
In fact, I think that Dorsey had launched the Bluesky project and placed high bets on it before he even knew that the Fediverse existed. And when he found out about the Fediverse, there was no way back anymore. Not without being punished by his investors.
Marc Zuckerberg, on the other hand, knew about the Fediverse when he greenlit Project 92, now known as Threads, for one of its earliest announced features was interoperability with the Fediverse via ActivityPub. That's another difference: He didn't want to compete with the Fediverse, he wanted to connect to it. Whether he actually will, now that one of the main perks of doing so has vanished due to Meta being Meta and the EU reacting accordingly, remains to be seen.
But even if ActivityPub came to Threads, that wouldn't mean that Zuck embraces the Fediverse. He won't. Even if they all used ActivityPub, the Fediverse as we know it now would be direct competition for Threads.
Threads won't tell its users about Mastodon, Akkoma, The Project Still Known As CalcKey, Pixelfed, Lemmy etc. That'd be like Microsoft officially acknowledging that Linux-based operating systems are nice, too, if installed stand-alone instead of Windows. That'd be like Apple officially publishing a list of the top five greatest Android phones with Samsung on #1.
Threads won't tell its users how to migrate to another Fediverse instance. That'd be like Microsoft officially publishing a tutorial on how to wipe your hard drive and replace the Windows on your computer with Ubuntu.
And Threads won't add migration functionality to elsewhere in the Fediverse either. That'd be like Microsoft installing an exporter for personal data on everyone's Windows machines on the next patch day that makes it easier for you to keep your data when replacing Windows with GNU/Linux on your machine.
For a while after ActivityPub has been activated, practically nobody on Threads would make use of it, especially not to connect with users in the rest of the Fediverse. They simply won't know that this rest of the Fediverse exists, much less who exists there. If any connections will be established, they'll be in-bound.
Even these first connections won't come to pass by someone discovering a cool Threads account in their Mastodon timeline. Instead, someone will stumble upon Threads accounts either because they're on Threads themselves or because the addresses of these Threads accounts are published somewhere on the Web, e.g. someone adding their Threads ID to their blog or their website. They'd end up connecting by copy-pasting that someone's Threads ID into their search field.
After these first connections have been established, it will still take very very long for the Threads users to discover that there's a Fediverse beyond Threads. No, really.
For comparison: Many of you came into the Fediverse through mastodon.social. And I dare say that a great deal of those of you did not know anything about decentralisation and instances and all that stuff at that point and instead believed that they had joined another centralised walled garden like Twitter. Someone has told me a while ago that some people who came in through mastodon.social took three months to even notice that Mastodon is decentralised, that many of the toots in their timelines come from someplace else than mastodon.social.
It takes new Mastodon users even longer to discover that there's a Fediverse beyond Mastodon. From my experience, that's often three to six months. There are three major ways for Mastodon users to find that out.
One, you stumble upon a post that mentions Fediverse projects that aren't Mastodon, and that mentions that they're Fediverse projects and connected to Mastodon.
Two, you post something that implies or out-right claims that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, and someone comes and tells you otherwise in the comments.
Three, you discover weird-looking posts in your timeline that can't possibly come from Mastodon with way over 500 characters, strange-looking mentions, strange-looking hashtags etc. If you inquire whoever wrote that post about it, they'll tell you they aren't on Mastodon, but on an instance of another project which is nonetheless connected to Mastodon.
It'll be very similar on Threads, but on a much greater scale with a much bigger timeframe. I guess many Threads users may spend years without even encountering a post from outside. Most will spend many months. And I'm not talking about actually noticing that the post in question did not originate on Threads.
Unless Threads will actually slam account IDs with non-Threads domains on them into its users' faces, I think one element that Threads users will notice will be hashtags which Threads doesn't have, but which I don't expect Threads to strip out entirely like Mastodon strips out any and all text formatting. Thread user: "Hey dumbass, this ain't Twitter, Threads doesn't have hashtags!" External user: "But Mastodon has them. I'm on Mastodon and not on Threads." Thread user: "What's Mastodon, and WTF are you doing on my timeline then?!" External user: "[Fediverse explanation noises]" And even this will only lead to one more Threads user knowing about the rest of the Fediverse. Out of hundreds of millions.
The difference between mastodon.social and Threads is that new arrivals on mastodon.social are left uninformed about what Mastodon is and how it works to make on-boarding easier than if they were educated about decentralisation and instances and other Fediverse projects and then left to choose the project and the instance themselves. Threads users, on the other hand, are left believing that, beyond being a centralised silo, Threads is a walled garden with no connections to the outside world whatsoever. To be fair, it is one right now and will remain one for the foreseeable future. mastodon.social doesn't try to pretend to be a walled garden. And Mastodon itself only does so a little by hardly, if ever, acknowledging the rest of the Fediverse.
If Threads users should actually set out to discover the rest of the Fediverse and make connections to there, the impression they get from the Fediverse won't be too positive. That's because two out of three Fediverse instances will be inaccessible to them due to having blocked Threads altogether. From the point-of-view of a Threads user who has always put full trust and faith into all Facebook/Meta products and never used anything decentralised before, believing that even e-mail is a Microsoft or Google or Yahoo! product, the Fediverse will appear as nothing but a bunch of entitled arseholes.
It certainly won't help that the [Fediverse explanation noises] won't include, "This is all just hackish amateur stuff rather than professional corporate software development, and we're lightyears from your features, but it does its job." Instead, users from other Fediverse projects will mention ("brag about") the features that these other Fediverse projects have that Threads lacks. Hashtags, for example. Let me show you them.
It gets even worse if someone on Threads happens upon someone on something else than Mastodon. In comparison with Akkoma, Threads pales more. In comparison with what's-still-but-not-for-much-longer-called-CalcKey, it pales even more. And now imagine what'd happen if someone on Threads met someone on Hubzilla. Or /kbin. "Whaddaya mean, you're talkin' to me from a Reddit clone?! How's that even possible?"
Okay, so those Fediverse people aren't just entitled, they're also snooty braggarts who claim that their stuff that was developed with a budget of zero is allegedly better than Threads that was developed with a several-billion-dollar budget.
Let's just say that even if the Threads users discovered the Fediverse beyond Threads by-and-by, they wouldn't be too keen on connecting to what's left of it that they can actually connect to. The biggest chances will be if it'll be possible on Threads to share Follow Friday posts from Mastodon in such a way that it isn't too obvious that they come from Mastodon. Since Mastodon mentions don't include domains, they might pretty well pass for mentioning Threads users, and the Threads community will believe that Follow Friday was invented on Threads. Also, out-right celebrities on George Takei's level of fame if they reside on instances that don't block Threads. But otherwise, no chance. -
Another thing that I think #Threads did well is that — they let you follow people BEFORE they (also) joined Threads.
They did it by identifying these people by their #Instagram ID.
But you could imagine this working with other IDs, too.
-
@Ciantic The fact that #threads was released explicitly WITHOUT the ability for EU citizens to sign up says everything you need to know about #meta and their abhorrent user #privacy track record.
That they decided it was easier to exclude nearly half a billion people rather than face the consequences is rather wild.
-
I started muting every brand and influencer #Threads has put in my home-feed (that I am not following).
It somewhat improved the home-feed.
-
One thing that I think #Threads did well is that — they were able to bring over large chunks of communities over from #Instagram to Threads.
(They did it by pulling in users from Instagram to Threads https://mastodon.social/@reiver/110665875303226142 )
I think that this is one challenges the Fediverse has had, that affects retention.
One of the draws of a social-media network is the individuals and the communities that are there.
-
Yes, according to The Guardian, #regulations in the EU were the main issue: "Sources at #Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, said regulations were behind the postponement of an EU launch, amid a series of clashes between the social media group and the bloc." #Threads #P92 #Project92
-
The home feed of #Meta 's / #Facebook 's / #Instagram 's new social-media network #Threads seems to only be showing me posts from accounts I do NOT follow.
I wonder if it is because the accounts I do follow there aren't posting (or aren't posting enough).
Or their #RecommendationEngine (which so many people wrongly call the #Algorithm ) doesn't seem good at figuring out what I'm interested in. Maybe it doesn't have enough data — although they do have data on me from Instagram.
#project92 #p92 -
I'm confused, hoping someone can explain:
One of the "defederate with Threads" arguments being advanced is that "Threads is about harvesting user's data"
Which, ok, sure - Threads is about harvesting *Threads users* data, that part I get.
What part of this setup, though, allows Threads to harvest *other* people's data (ie, the fediverse in general), in a way that can be genuinely blocked by defederating with them?
-
@asjmcguire Honestly my stance is that I cannot prevent #P92 from using my contents to hurt their users; if they want to interact with us, they need to do so on our own terms.
I'm really pondering federating with #Threads on my own, self-hosted @bonfire instance, and I'm leaning towards not federating by default, for this reason and also because if I defederate from their instance later on they'll assimilate the Fediverse with drama, especially because social media provide affordances to seem and not to be, not to write ideas as affordances, enabling action, but rather to give a picture-perfect representation of yourself.
By the way, if we federate with Threads there might be strong economic incentives for creators to play this game instead of being more authentic. I could pull half a dozen of other reasons I've found from the top of my head, but I really don't want to reject Threads users, they will be free to read me by joining any free server implementation of ActivityPub.
-
Of all things about #Threads, what puzzles me the most is why they codenamed it #P92 or project #Barcelona.
I can only think of the Barcelona Olympic competition of 1992. But why would #Meta use that? Do they code name all their projects with Olympic cities?
It can't be random. Anyone knows or has a good guess?
-
@dausacker Recentemente, na discussão que referenciei agora, uma pessoa compartilhou uma outra publicação que pode servir de contexto histórico: https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/110629552225370551
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker Exemplo da estratégia de abraçar, estender e extinguir foi o que #Google / #Alphabet e #Facebook / #Meta / #WhatsApp fizeram contra o #XMPP: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/XMPP.pt
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Threads #Twitter #Instagram #Project92 #P92 #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker Há algumas discussões que eu mesmo tenho participado brevemente sobre isso no #ActivityPub, uma delas está em https://atomicpoet.org/objects/ed0a6a5d-f860-4c22-9eda-5f3ed8dfbdf7
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker O autor da publicação, Rodrigo Ghedin, parece esquecer da estratégia adotada pelos proponentes da #IdeologiaCaliforniana para degradar padrões internacionais que envolve o ato de abraçar, estender e extinguir.
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker O autor da publicação, Rodrigo Ghedin, parece esquecer da estratégia adotada pelos proponentes da #IdeologiaCaliforniana para degradar padrões internacionais que envolve o ato de abraçar, estender e extinguir.
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker O autor da publicação, Rodrigo Ghedin, parece esquecer da estratégia adotada pelos proponentes da #IdeologiaCaliforniana para degradar padrões internacionais que envolve o ato de abraçar, estender e extinguir.
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
@dausacker O autor da publicação, Rodrigo Ghedin, parece esquecer da estratégia adotada pelos proponentes da #IdeologiaCaliforniana para degradar padrões internacionais que envolve o ato de abraçar, estender e extinguir.
#Padrões #Padrão #PadrãoDeMercado #Standard #Standards #OpenStandard #OpenStandards #CalifornianIdeology #Meta #Threads #Facebook #Twitter #Instagram #WhatsApp #Google #Alphabet #Project92 #P92 #XMPP #ActivityPub #Mastodon #Federação #Federation #Fediverse #Fediverso
-
Viele machen sich Sorgen wegen des angekündigten Einstiegs des #Facebook-Konzerns #Meta ins Fediverse. Es geht um die App #Threads. Was wir darüber wissen, steht hier: https://digitalcourage.de/blog/2023/fediverse-teilen-und-herrschen
Bei @digitalcourage haben wir noch nicht entschieden, ob wir Metas Fediverse-Instanz(en) aus unseren Instanzen aussperren werden. Noch funktioniert bei threads.net das Föderieren nicht. Das kann sich aber jederzeit ändern.
Wer vorbeugend ausschließen will, dass die eigenen Tröts zu Meta/Threads gelangen, kann sich mit folgender Anleitung abschotten:
1. Die CSV-Datei von https://gitlab.digitalcourage.de/fediverse/lists/-/raw/main/blocked_domains.csv herunterladen.
2. In den persönlichen Mastodon-Einstellungen auf „Importieren und Exportieren“ gehen, dann auf „Importieren“, also hierhin: https://digitalcourage.social/settings/imports
3. In der Auswahlbox „Domain-Sperrliste“ auswählen
4. Die zuvor heruntergeladene CSV-Datei dort hochladen
5. Wenn das geklappt hat, müssten Einträge mit „threads“ auf https://digitalcourage.social/domain_blocks zu sehen sein
Vielen Dank an @ordnung für die Vorlage!
-
AFAICT, #Meta / #Facebook grew their new social-media network #Threads by mostly bringing over users from their old social-media network #Instagram .
Online video games use this technique, too.
They try to get people who play their old video game to play their new video game.It tends to make the customer acquisition cost a lot less expensive.
-
I've got a funny little story for you. So, a while back, someone was all like, "Hey, #Mastodon and #ActivityPub are totally done for because Bluesky is this massive gorilla with loads of cash!" And you know what? I've been saying for ages that if Bluesky is a gorilla, then #P92 (or #Threads, as the kids now call it) is a ginormous whale! And guess what? Tonight, my friend, I've been proven right!
Hold on to your hats because Threads has gone from zero to millions of users in less than a day! -
Reminds me of MongoDB vs RethinkDB
"RethinkDB: why we failed"
https://web.archive.org/web/20170119021049/http://defstartup.org/2017/01/18/why-rethinkdb-failed.html#meta #facebook #threads #project92 #p92
https://mstdn.binarytango.com/@binarytango/110665558368417733
-
@Bloonface Zuckerberg pleasuring himself while reading my unencrypted DMs though. Can’t stop thinking about it #P92
-
CW: Long post - FediPact, Meta, P92 - No, Mark Zuckerberg won't meet you in the lobby Chris Trottier
No, Mark Zuckerberg won't meet you in the lobby Chris Trottier.
Recently one of the fediverse's most ardent proponents of collaboration with Meta produced a long thread in which he details his argument for embracing the P92 gambit with open arms. This post is a response.
If you're wondering why he is not tagged or addressed directly in his thread, that's because Chris is want to block anyone who offers up even the most polite of substantive counterpoints. We'll just toodle along over here thanks. The intent is not actually to debate him, but to provide food for thought to those who might have been persuaded by his relentless advocacy to federate.
The original thread is here: https://atomicpoet.org/notice/AX9zOBSSW6gg06h9t2
Trottier seems to believe that ActivityPub possesses extraordinary powers: "ActivityPub means that whatever of Meta’s userbase that’s exposed to federation will diversify into other platforms […] This diversification reduces the dependence of users on a single platform, giving them more choices and potentially drawing them away from Meta."
But he never acknowledges that Meta platforms comprise an algorithmically-governed censorship regime which repress information of many kinds - for example, the #joinpixelfed hashtag, which was banned on Instagram along with the Pixelfed account itself. Why would this entity allow pied pipers of the fediverse to frolic freely on P92 and evangelize escape from its enclosure?
For that matter, why does he think that would work at all? The userbase of Instagram will be prompted to join Threads. That means something of the existing network effect of that longstanding service will be transplanted in; and rest assured, there will be no account migration functionality provided.
In fact, the number of teen-dream travel-snap influencers who will, upon exposure to a single post by Chris Trottier on the magic of W3C protocol development, leap to wrench themselves away from the highly addictive and even financially-incentivized dependency on their established social graph and plunge themselves into the X11-Wayland religious war waged among the beloved catgirls of the fediverse is statistically very close to zero.
There is also an unsettling absence of agency in Chris's characterization of the lost souls of Meta, as if they're just sheep waiting for the good shepherds of decentralization to lead them to greener pastures. Instagram account holders are free to sign up for a fediverse account right now, and many have already done so - and by the way, the reverse flow is also quite possible for anyone here who wishes to connect to friends and family on Meta networks.
To open this "revelatory" "Pandora's Box" (his words) of the ActivityPub Rapture, Trottier proposes, with great bloviation, something called "lobby servers". As he describes: "Lobby servers can bridge communities. They act as intermediaries that connect different social media platforms, including Meta-owned ones, with non-Meta platforms. […] By federating with Meta, lobby servers can pull content from Meta’s network and redistribute it to other federated platforms. This syndication allows users on non-Meta platforms to access and engage with Meta users’ content, thereby exposing them to different perspectives and encouraging cross-platform interactions…"
The flowery language continues on, but he is not actually proposing some novel new technical development. There is nothing described which is not already part and parcel of ActivityPub federation. The "lobby server" is simply a rebrand of "an instance federating with Meta".
This Hotel California doublespeak is indicative of the most problematic aspects of the communications of pro-Meta luminaries. In a ploy more typical of the contemporary reactionary right, the values and intentions of the opposing fediverse opinions on Meta are inverted. Trottier's post begins: "Federation with Meta actually hurts Meta."
He continues, referencing the FediPact community: "… it’s not everyone’s objective to fight Meta, and there should be spaces where fighting Meta isn’t top of mind. Not everyone wants to be part and parcel of a fight, and that’s okay." So, in this new upside-down reality, the anticapitalists trying to save at least part of the fediverse from colonization by one of the most destructive corporations in the world "don't want to fight Meta"; the true revolutionaries are those eager to collaborate with that corporation.
The Orwellian trolling degenerates from there. He claims that turning away from P92 - a single vertical silo which may comprise tens or even hundreds of millions of users - will paradoxically harm decentralization, because all those little servers federated with each other somehow result in "fragmentation" instead. And the anarchists and marginalized communities in the FediPact? They're actually pro-police authoritarians! "To enforce total defederation will require whitelisting, and policing of that whitelist." The term "whitelist" is repeated over and over in this paragraph, which is a subtle dig in the direction of a general and very nasty propensity among pro-Zuck advocates to associate the FediPact with the "HOA" and the *absence* of diversity.
On the whole, the most visible proponents for Meta collaboration have been big-instance admins who have done neither themselves or their cause any good over the last couple of weeks. Chris Trottier is something of an exception. We have repeatedly noted people explaining that they were on the fence over the Meta issue, until convinced by Trottier's arguments. He may fancy himself as fighting Meta, but by relentlessly arguing in favor of federating with them, he is actually serving as their most useful and effective asset in the fediverse.
#DefederateMeta #FediblockMeta #FediPact #Meta #P92 #Threads
-
Anyone else see that #MarkTheVirus is getting set up, yet again, for failure, with this whole #P92 #Twitter venture but with waaaaaaay less text than 280 chars?
( P92 is 60 Chars btw.)
-
CW: Meta meta, Eternal November, simple explanation
Alex Norris made this entry of Webcomic Name that perfectly describes Fedi right now.
Fedi grew out of groups forced out of places like Twitter and Facebook. It is a space built specifically to protect everyone here from the systems that did it.
When we talk about #P92, #Facebook, #Meta, #Bluesky, and newcomers who immediately want changes to make Fedi more like other spaces, this is exactly that in 3 panels.
-
@samsteiner @chm @micha Habt ihr euch über das #Projekt92 von #Meta schon Gedanken gemacht? Was ist eure Meinung dazu?
Should the #Fediverse welcome its new surveillance-capitalism overlords? Opinions differ!
Block Meta or "trust but verify"?
#activitypub #theantimetapact #thepact #fedipact #fediverse #surveillance #capitalism #project92 #p92
https://privacy.thenexus.today/should-the-fediverse-welcome-surveillance-capitalism
-
“When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” – Maya Angelou
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/09/20/the-face-of-facebook
#dumbFucks #MarkZuckerberg #meta #facebook #instagram #p92 #fediverse #mastodon #BigTech #SurveillanceCapitalism #PeopleFarming
-
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #fuckThreads #threadsNet
DSC00089-I-don't-wanna-be-u're-friend-on-facebook_-_reLater-2011.png, Neukölln, Berlin
Nothing has changed since then! Leave me alone!
#illovolovesartefacts -
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #fuckThreads #threadsNet
DSC00089-I-don't-wanna-be-u're-friend-on-facebook_-_reLater-2011.png, Neukölln, Berlin
Nothing has changed since then! Leave me alone!
#illovolovesartefacts -
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #fuckThreads #threadsNet
DSC00089-I-don't-wanna-be-u're-friend-on-facebook_-_reLater-2011.png, Neukölln, Berlin
Nothing has changed since then! Leave me alone!
#illovolovesartefacts -
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #fuckThreads #threadsNet
DSC00089-I-don't-wanna-be-u're-friend-on-facebook_-_reLater-2011.png, Neukölln, Berlin
Nothing has changed since then! Leave me alone!
#illovolovesartefacts -
#FuckMeta #Fuckerberg #FuckFacebook #Meta #Facebook #Zuckerberg #FuckZuckerberg #Project92 #P92 #FuckP92 #fuckThreads #threadsNet
DSC00089-I-don't-wanna-be-u're-friend-on-facebook_-_reLater-2011.png, Neukölln, Berlin
Nothing has changed since then! Leave me alone!
#illovolovesartefacts