Search
316 results for “resplendent606”
-
When the world is ugly outside and on the internet, just download a Linux ISO and learn something new. At least, that is how I distract myself sometimes.
Today I am messing with Parabola GNU/Linux-Libre in virt-manager.
-
I believe Senator Mark Kelly is one of the most patriotic people in the existence of this country. Not only did he serve 25 years in the Navy (in combat) and NASA, his wife took a bullet to the head while meeting with her constituents. This is Senator John McCain levels of patriotism.
His biggest critic, a mandarin colored pedophile sex pest rapist sociopath who never served in any office or service until he was 70 and only out of personal gain.
-
I figured I'd share my hyfetch for all of my systems, as I usually only post one at a time.
Everything is the way I want it set. It has taken a lot of time and work to get it exactly the way I want it. I am happy.
Top left: My desktop (gaming pc) running Debian 13 stable with Cinnamon DE.
Top right: My laptop, a Thinkpad T14 Gen 1, also running Debian 13 stable with Cinnamon DE.
Bottom left: My Homelab server, a HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF, running Proxmox 9 (headless).
Bottom right: VM in the Proxmox server running Debian 13 stable (headless). This system runs the majority of my Docker services.
There is another VM for Home Assistant OS in the Proxmox server, too. I also maintain other computers that are not mine.
#Debian #Debian13 #Proxmox #Hyfetch #Lenovo #Thinkpad #T14 #GNULinux #GNU #Linux #HomeAssistant #selfhost
-
The turkey caught up to Sophia.
-
The turkey caught up to Sophia.
-
The turkey caught up to Sophia.
-
Happy Thanksgiving! I am thankful for my friends on Mastodon. Thank you!
-
This was well done:
Cultural Appropriation in Pop Culture: Ep 23 of Crash Course Native American History
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Tg2mCKP6tY
#CrashCourse #NorthAmericanIndian #NativeAmerican #NativeAmericanHistory #AmericanHistory #CulturalAppropriation
#IndigenousVoices #NativeRepresentation #HollywoodStereotypes #IndigenousCulture #DecolonizeHollywood #NativeAmericanArt #FilmHistory #MediaRepresentation -
The worst part of watching Pluribus is having to wait for the next episode. Its really good!
-
New Moon Man video dropped.
Premonition | Retro Poland Original by Maromaro1337
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ69JHfn2-0
#maromaro1337 #retro #Poland #1990s #YouTube #video #music #guitar
-
Sophia (top) hanging out with Cotton (bottom) on this nice Thursday afternoon.
-
Sophia (top) hanging out with Cotton (bottom) on this nice Thursday afternoon.
-
Sophia (top) hanging out with Cotton (bottom) on this nice Thursday afternoon.
-
Its a work in progress, but this is how my new (to me) Thinkpad T14 Gen 1 looks like at the moment. Debian sticker added to front, a few stickers on the back.
-
-
We are told our nation is "broke." We are told we can't afford to solve our most basic human crises. But this is a lie of priorities, not of scarcity.
Wouldn't it be better to redistribute the wealth by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and healing the sick? You know, because it is the right thing to do.
Estimates show it would cost around $20 billion per year to provide the permanent supportive housing needed to effectively end chronic homelessness in the U.S.
Making the national school lunch program universally free for every child, ending "lunch debt" and child hunger at school, would cost approximately $5.6 billion per year in addition to current funding.
These are not astronomical sums. They are a rounding error for the ultra-wealthy. We could solve these profound social failures for a fraction of the annual gains on the stock portfolios of the top 1%.
Instead, we are told to worry... "Oh no, Bezos might move away! If we tax the ultra rich they will all move away!" Cool, we'd be so much better off!
First, that threat is mostly a bluff. The "irreplaceable founder" is a myth. If Bezos leaves, he doesn't get to take the Amazon warehouses, the distribution network, or the thousands of U.S. employees with him. The assets, infrastructure, and markets that generate the wealth stay right here.
Plus, academic studies and historical tax data show "tax flight" is not a real phenomenon. One of the most thorough studies on the topic was by Stanford sociologist Cristobal Young who analyzed 13 years of tax returns for every millionaire in the U.S.
He found that millionaires are the least likely group to move. They are more rooted in their communities, businesses, and social networks than the general population. The idea that they will all flee to a low-tax country is a political scare tactic, not an economic reality.
When I say we'd be "better off," I'm not just being facetious. Their departure would be a "corruption drain."
Extreme, concentrated wealth doesn't just sit there; it is used to buy political influence. It is funneled into an army of lobbyists, Super PACs, and media organizations, all designed to do one thing: skew policy, kill regulations, and lower their own taxes.
The massive financial influence strangles our democracy. It ensures that the needs of the wealthy are heard in the halls of Congress, while the needs of the people are ignored. Getting that corrupting money out of our political system is a massive net gain for a functioning society.
Finally, the redistributed money is simply better for the economy.
Wealth hoarded at the top is "low-velocity." It sits in passive stock portfolios and hedge funds inflating asset bubbles but doing nothing for the real economy.
Money given to the poor and middle class (through programs like universal school lunch or housing) is "high-velocity." It gets spent immediately on rent, groceries, car repairs, and local services. This directly stimulates Main Street, creates jobs, and builds a more stable, resilient economy from the ground up.
Taxing the rich to feed the hungry isn't just charity; it's a powerful and efficient economic stimulus.
This "high-velocity" principle doesn't just apply to one-off programs. It’s the logic that underpins the biggest progressive goals: Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal Healthcare (UHC).
Universal Basic Income is the ultimate economic stimulant. It's a direct, recurring cash injection to the bottom 90%, creating a stable consumer base that fuels local economies. Roosevelt Institute found that a UBI, by increasing demand, would grow the economy by 12.5% over eight years. It’s not a "handout"; it's a permanent investment in the Main Street businesses that are starved for customers.
Universal Healthcare acts as a massive economic liberation. It frees tens of millions of Americans from medical debt, which is still a top cause of personal bankruptcy. That money would be "high-velocity," but is instead is siphoned off by collection agencies and a the parasitic insurance industry.
By separating insurance from employment, UHC would finally break the "job lock" that traps millions in jobs they hate. Studies repeatedly show "job lock" suppresses entrepreneurship. The act of freeing people to take risks, start their own businesses or move to a better-fitting job would unleash a wave of innovation and economic dynamism that our current system smothers.
The choice is clear. The "lie of scarcity" is a tool used by the wealthy to protect their hoarded wealth at the expense of our society.
Sources and further reading:
American Progress - https://www.americanprogress.org/article/faith-in-values-resolve-to-end-homelessness-in-2013/
American Inequality - https://www.americaninequality.io/homelessness
Jacobin - https://jacobin.com/2023/03/universal-free-school-lunch-means-testing-education-fees
Cristobal Young - https://cristobalyoung.com/research/taxing-the-rich-millionaire-migration/
UBI (Roosevelt Institute): https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-ubi/
#longrant #rant #EattheRich #Equality #economy #homelessness #hungry #SNAP #universalhealthcare #schoollunch #universalbasicincome
-
We are told our nation is "broke." We are told we can't afford to solve our most basic human crises. But this is a lie of priorities, not of scarcity.
Wouldn't it be better to redistribute the wealth by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and healing the sick? You know, because it is the right thing to do.
Estimates show it would cost around $20 billion per year to provide the permanent supportive housing needed to effectively end chronic homelessness in the U.S.
Making the national school lunch program universally free for every child, ending "lunch debt" and child hunger at school, would cost approximately $5.6 billion per year in addition to current funding.
These are not astronomical sums. They are a rounding error for the ultra-wealthy. We could solve these profound social failures for a fraction of the annual gains on the stock portfolios of the top 1%.
Instead, we are told to worry... "Oh no, Bezos might move away! If we tax the ultra rich they will all move away!" Cool, we'd be so much better off!
First, that threat is mostly a bluff. The "irreplaceable founder" is a myth. If Bezos leaves, he doesn't get to take the Amazon warehouses, the distribution network, or the thousands of U.S. employees with him. The assets, infrastructure, and markets that generate the wealth stay right here.
Plus, academic studies and historical tax data show "tax flight" is not a real phenomenon. One of the most thorough studies on the topic was by Stanford sociologist Cristobal Young who analyzed 13 years of tax returns for every millionaire in the U.S.
He found that millionaires are the least likely group to move. They are more rooted in their communities, businesses, and social networks than the general population. The idea that they will all flee to a low-tax country is a political scare tactic, not an economic reality.
When I say we'd be "better off," I'm not just being facetious. Their departure would be a "corruption drain."
Extreme, concentrated wealth doesn't just sit there; it is used to buy political influence. It is funneled into an army of lobbyists, Super PACs, and media organizations, all designed to do one thing: skew policy, kill regulations, and lower their own taxes.
The massive financial influence strangles our democracy. It ensures that the needs of the wealthy are heard in the halls of Congress, while the needs of the people are ignored. Getting that corrupting money out of our political system is a massive net gain for a functioning society.
Finally, the redistributed money is simply better for the economy.
Wealth hoarded at the top is "low-velocity." It sits in passive stock portfolios and hedge funds inflating asset bubbles but doing nothing for the real economy.
Money given to the poor and middle class (through programs like universal school lunch or housing) is "high-velocity." It gets spent immediately on rent, groceries, car repairs, and local services. This directly stimulates Main Street, creates jobs, and builds a more stable, resilient economy from the ground up.
Taxing the rich to feed the hungry isn't just charity; it's a powerful and efficient economic stimulus.
This "high-velocity" principle doesn't just apply to one-off programs. It’s the logic that underpins the biggest progressive goals: Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal Healthcare (UHC).
Universal Basic Income is the ultimate economic stimulant. It's a direct, recurring cash injection to the bottom 90%, creating a stable consumer base that fuels local economies. Roosevelt Institute found that a UBI, by increasing demand, would grow the economy by 12.5% over eight years. It’s not a "handout"; it's a permanent investment in the Main Street businesses that are starved for customers.
Universal Healthcare acts as a massive economic liberation. It frees tens of millions of Americans from medical debt, which is still a top cause of personal bankruptcy. That money would be "high-velocity," but is instead is siphoned off by collection agencies and a the parasitic insurance industry.
By separating insurance from employment, UHC would finally break the "job lock" that traps millions in jobs they hate. Studies repeatedly show "job lock" suppresses entrepreneurship. The act of freeing people to take risks, start their own businesses or move to a better-fitting job would unleash a wave of innovation and economic dynamism that our current system smothers.
The choice is clear. The "lie of scarcity" is a tool used by the wealthy to protect their hoarded wealth at the expense of our society.
Sources and further reading:
American Progress - https://www.americanprogress.org/article/faith-in-values-resolve-to-end-homelessness-in-2013/
American Inequality - https://www.americaninequality.io/homelessness
Jacobin - https://jacobin.com/2023/03/universal-free-school-lunch-means-testing-education-fees
Cristobal Young - https://cristobalyoung.com/research/taxing-the-rich-millionaire-migration/
UBI (Roosevelt Institute): https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-ubi/
#longrant #rant #EattheRich #Equality #economy #homelessness #hungry #SNAP #universalhealthcare #schoollunch #universalbasicincome
-
We are told our nation is "broke." We are told we can't afford to solve our most basic human crises. But this is a lie of priorities, not of scarcity.
Wouldn't it be better to redistribute the wealth by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and healing the sick? You know, because it is the right thing to do.
Estimates show it would cost around $20 billion per year to provide the permanent supportive housing needed to effectively end chronic homelessness in the U.S.
Making the national school lunch program universally free for every child, ending "lunch debt" and child hunger at school, would cost approximately $5.6 billion per year in addition to current funding.
These are not astronomical sums. They are a rounding error for the ultra-wealthy. We could solve these profound social failures for a fraction of the annual gains on the stock portfolios of the top 1%.
Instead, we are told to worry... "Oh no, Bezos might move away! If we tax the ultra rich they will all move away!" Cool, we'd be so much better off!
First, that threat is mostly a bluff. The "irreplaceable founder" is a myth. If Bezos leaves, he doesn't get to take the Amazon warehouses, the distribution network, or the thousands of U.S. employees with him. The assets, infrastructure, and markets that generate the wealth stay right here.
Plus, academic studies and historical tax data show "tax flight" is not a real phenomenon. One of the most thorough studies on the topic was by Stanford sociologist Cristobal Young who analyzed 13 years of tax returns for every millionaire in the U.S.
He found that millionaires are the least likely group to move. They are more rooted in their communities, businesses, and social networks than the general population. The idea that they will all flee to a low-tax country is a political scare tactic, not an economic reality.
When I say we'd be "better off," I'm not just being facetious. Their departure would be a "corruption drain."
Extreme, concentrated wealth doesn't just sit there; it is used to buy political influence. It is funneled into an army of lobbyists, Super PACs, and media organizations, all designed to do one thing: skew policy, kill regulations, and lower their own taxes.
The massive financial influence strangles our democracy. It ensures that the needs of the wealthy are heard in the halls of Congress, while the needs of the people are ignored. Getting that corrupting money out of our political system is a massive net gain for a functioning society.
Finally, the redistributed money is simply better for the economy.
Wealth hoarded at the top is "low-velocity." It sits in passive stock portfolios and hedge funds inflating asset bubbles but doing nothing for the real economy.
Money given to the poor and middle class (through programs like universal school lunch or housing) is "high-velocity." It gets spent immediately on rent, groceries, car repairs, and local services. This directly stimulates Main Street, creates jobs, and builds a more stable, resilient economy from the ground up.
Taxing the rich to feed the hungry isn't just charity; it's a powerful and efficient economic stimulus.
This "high-velocity" principle doesn't just apply to one-off programs. It’s the logic that underpins the biggest progressive goals: Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal Healthcare (UHC).
Universal Basic Income is the ultimate economic stimulant. It's a direct, recurring cash injection to the bottom 90%, creating a stable consumer base that fuels local economies. Roosevelt Institute found that a UBI, by increasing demand, would grow the economy by 12.5% over eight years. It’s not a "handout"; it's a permanent investment in the Main Street businesses that are starved for customers.
Universal Healthcare acts as a massive economic liberation. It frees tens of millions of Americans from medical debt, which is still a top cause of personal bankruptcy. That money would be "high-velocity," but is instead is siphoned off by collection agencies and a the parasitic insurance industry.
By separating insurance from employment, UHC would finally break the "job lock" that traps millions in jobs they hate. Studies repeatedly show "job lock" suppresses entrepreneurship. The act of freeing people to take risks, start their own businesses or move to a better-fitting job would unleash a wave of innovation and economic dynamism that our current system smothers.
The choice is clear. The "lie of scarcity" is a tool used by the wealthy to protect their hoarded wealth at the expense of our society.
Sources and further reading:
American Progress - https://www.americanprogress.org/article/faith-in-values-resolve-to-end-homelessness-in-2013/
American Inequality - https://www.americaninequality.io/homelessness
Jacobin - https://jacobin.com/2023/03/universal-free-school-lunch-means-testing-education-fees
Cristobal Young - https://cristobalyoung.com/research/taxing-the-rich-millionaire-migration/
UBI (Roosevelt Institute): https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-ubi/
#longrant #rant #EattheRich #Equality #economy #homelessness #hungry #SNAP #universalhealthcare #schoollunch #universalbasicincome
-
We are told our nation is "broke." We are told we can't afford to solve our most basic human crises. But this is a lie of priorities, not of scarcity.
Wouldn't it be better to redistribute the wealth by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and healing the sick? You know, because it is the right thing to do.
Estimates show it would cost around $20 billion per year to provide the permanent supportive housing needed to effectively end chronic homelessness in the U.S.
Making the national school lunch program universally free for every child, ending "lunch debt" and child hunger at school, would cost approximately $5.6 billion per year in addition to current funding.
These are not astronomical sums. They are a rounding error for the ultra-wealthy. We could solve these profound social failures for a fraction of the annual gains on the stock portfolios of the top 1%.
Instead, we are told to worry... "Oh no, Bezos might move away! If we tax the ultra rich they will all move away!" Cool, we'd be so much better off!
First, that threat is mostly a bluff. The "irreplaceable founder" is a myth. If Bezos leaves, he doesn't get to take the Amazon warehouses, the distribution network, or the thousands of U.S. employees with him. The assets, infrastructure, and markets that generate the wealth stay right here.
Plus, academic studies and historical tax data show "tax flight" is not a real phenomenon. One of the most thorough studies on the topic was by Stanford sociologist Cristobal Young who analyzed 13 years of tax returns for every millionaire in the U.S.
He found that millionaires are the least likely group to move. They are more rooted in their communities, businesses, and social networks than the general population. The idea that they will all flee to a low-tax country is a political scare tactic, not an economic reality.
When I say we'd be "better off," I'm not just being facetious. Their departure would be a "corruption drain."
Extreme, concentrated wealth doesn't just sit there; it is used to buy political influence. It is funneled into an army of lobbyists, Super PACs, and media organizations, all designed to do one thing: skew policy, kill regulations, and lower their own taxes.
The massive financial influence strangles our democracy. It ensures that the needs of the wealthy are heard in the halls of Congress, while the needs of the people are ignored. Getting that corrupting money out of our political system is a massive net gain for a functioning society.
Finally, the redistributed money is simply better for the economy.
Wealth hoarded at the top is "low-velocity." It sits in passive stock portfolios and hedge funds inflating asset bubbles but doing nothing for the real economy.
Money given to the poor and middle class (through programs like universal school lunch or housing) is "high-velocity." It gets spent immediately on rent, groceries, car repairs, and local services. This directly stimulates Main Street, creates jobs, and builds a more stable, resilient economy from the ground up.
Taxing the rich to feed the hungry isn't just charity; it's a powerful and efficient economic stimulus.
This "high-velocity" principle doesn't just apply to one-off programs. It’s the logic that underpins the biggest progressive goals: Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal Healthcare (UHC).
Universal Basic Income is the ultimate economic stimulant. It's a direct, recurring cash injection to the bottom 90%, creating a stable consumer base that fuels local economies. Roosevelt Institute found that a UBI, by increasing demand, would grow the economy by 12.5% over eight years. It’s not a "handout"; it's a permanent investment in the Main Street businesses that are starved for customers.
Universal Healthcare acts as a massive economic liberation. It frees tens of millions of Americans from medical debt, which is still a top cause of personal bankruptcy. That money would be "high-velocity," but is instead is siphoned off by collection agencies and a the parasitic insurance industry.
By separating insurance from employment, UHC would finally break the "job lock" that traps millions in jobs they hate. Studies repeatedly show "job lock" suppresses entrepreneurship. The act of freeing people to take risks, start their own businesses or move to a better-fitting job would unleash a wave of innovation and economic dynamism that our current system smothers.
The choice is clear. The "lie of scarcity" is a tool used by the wealthy to protect their hoarded wealth at the expense of our society.
Sources and further reading:
American Progress - https://www.americanprogress.org/article/faith-in-values-resolve-to-end-homelessness-in-2013/
American Inequality - https://www.americaninequality.io/homelessness
Jacobin - https://jacobin.com/2023/03/universal-free-school-lunch-means-testing-education-fees
Cristobal Young - https://cristobalyoung.com/research/taxing-the-rich-millionaire-migration/
UBI (Roosevelt Institute): https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-ubi/
#longrant #rant #EattheRich #Equality #economy #homelessness #hungry #SNAP #universalhealthcare #schoollunch #universalbasicincome
-
We are told our nation is "broke." We are told we can't afford to solve our most basic human crises. But this is a lie of priorities, not of scarcity.
Wouldn't it be better to redistribute the wealth by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and healing the sick? You know, because it is the right thing to do.
Estimates show it would cost around $20 billion per year to provide the permanent supportive housing needed to effectively end chronic homelessness in the U.S.
Making the national school lunch program universally free for every child, ending "lunch debt" and child hunger at school, would cost approximately $5.6 billion per year in addition to current funding.
These are not astronomical sums. They are a rounding error for the ultra-wealthy. We could solve these profound social failures for a fraction of the annual gains on the stock portfolios of the top 1%.
Instead, we are told to worry... "Oh no, Bezos might move away! If we tax the ultra rich they will all move away!" Cool, we'd be so much better off!
First, that threat is mostly a bluff. The "irreplaceable founder" is a myth. If Bezos leaves, he doesn't get to take the Amazon warehouses, the distribution network, or the thousands of U.S. employees with him. The assets, infrastructure, and markets that generate the wealth stay right here.
Plus, academic studies and historical tax data show "tax flight" is not a real phenomenon. One of the most thorough studies on the topic was by Stanford sociologist Cristobal Young who analyzed 13 years of tax returns for every millionaire in the U.S.
He found that millionaires are the least likely group to move. They are more rooted in their communities, businesses, and social networks than the general population. The idea that they will all flee to a low-tax country is a political scare tactic, not an economic reality.
When I say we'd be "better off," I'm not just being facetious. Their departure would be a "corruption drain."
Extreme, concentrated wealth doesn't just sit there; it is used to buy political influence. It is funneled into an army of lobbyists, Super PACs, and media organizations, all designed to do one thing: skew policy, kill regulations, and lower their own taxes.
The massive financial influence strangles our democracy. It ensures that the needs of the wealthy are heard in the halls of Congress, while the needs of the people are ignored. Getting that corrupting money out of our political system is a massive net gain for a functioning society.
Finally, the redistributed money is simply better for the economy.
Wealth hoarded at the top is "low-velocity." It sits in passive stock portfolios and hedge funds inflating asset bubbles but doing nothing for the real economy.
Money given to the poor and middle class (through programs like universal school lunch or housing) is "high-velocity." It gets spent immediately on rent, groceries, car repairs, and local services. This directly stimulates Main Street, creates jobs, and builds a more stable, resilient economy from the ground up.
Taxing the rich to feed the hungry isn't just charity; it's a powerful and efficient economic stimulus.
This "high-velocity" principle doesn't just apply to one-off programs. It’s the logic that underpins the biggest progressive goals: Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal Healthcare (UHC).
Universal Basic Income is the ultimate economic stimulant. It's a direct, recurring cash injection to the bottom 90%, creating a stable consumer base that fuels local economies. Roosevelt Institute found that a UBI, by increasing demand, would grow the economy by 12.5% over eight years. It’s not a "handout"; it's a permanent investment in the Main Street businesses that are starved for customers.
Universal Healthcare acts as a massive economic liberation. It frees tens of millions of Americans from medical debt, which is still a top cause of personal bankruptcy. That money would be "high-velocity," but is instead is siphoned off by collection agencies and a the parasitic insurance industry.
By separating insurance from employment, UHC would finally break the "job lock" that traps millions in jobs they hate. Studies repeatedly show "job lock" suppresses entrepreneurship. The act of freeing people to take risks, start their own businesses or move to a better-fitting job would unleash a wave of innovation and economic dynamism that our current system smothers.
The choice is clear. The "lie of scarcity" is a tool used by the wealthy to protect their hoarded wealth at the expense of our society.
Sources and further reading:
American Progress - https://www.americanprogress.org/article/faith-in-values-resolve-to-end-homelessness-in-2013/
American Inequality - https://www.americaninequality.io/homelessness
Jacobin - https://jacobin.com/2023/03/universal-free-school-lunch-means-testing-education-fees
Cristobal Young - https://cristobalyoung.com/research/taxing-the-rich-millionaire-migration/
UBI (Roosevelt Institute): https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/macroeconomic-effects-universal-basic-income-ubi/
#longrant #rant #EattheRich #Equality #economy #homelessness #hungry #SNAP #universalhealthcare #schoollunch #universalbasicincome
-
I got my blood work back from visiting the new doctor. For the first time in my life since being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, I might have it in remission. I went from 11.2 to 5.2 in 7 months. The only medication I take for diabetes is Mounjaro (not to be confused with Manjaro), which has also helped with the 50 lbs I have lost this year. Besides the medication, I also associate the improvement with eating better, drinking a lot of water (over 120 oz/day) and moving more.
-
This was pretty cool.
John Stamos Hears Papa Roach for the First Time
-
CW: I am going to use bad words to express my frustration with terrible people. This one involves: the mayor of Denver, Flock, and big fat huge lies.
What a piece of shit sorry excuse of a human being to make up shit about marginalized people in order to manipulate his constituents in an attempt to take away their 4th Amendment rights. He is no different from Donald Trump or any other lifeless cretin who regularly lies to get their way. He is more proof that Democrats are just as bad as Republicans and will do anything they can to get their way.
The mayor's office issued an apology but still claimed Flock "played a role in the investigation," which the victim's mother and Denver Police (who said it was only used to rule out leads) seem to contradict.
The article also notes the mayor has previously been called out for making unverified, misleading claims about Flock's use in detaining migrants.
He should resign from his post in shame. What a terrible apology. Pathological lying piece of shit.
#JaxGratton #Denver #MikeJohnston #Mayor #Democrats #politics #Flock
-
The customer service with Mint Mobile has been terrible up to this point. I'm entering my third month with them and I guess I've learned my lesson that a lot of time you get what you pay for.