home.social

#rnodes — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #rnodes, aggregated by home.social.


  1. It seems that it is important for all in a given based to update to the latest version to ensure all rnodes can function as intended.
    newreleases.io/project/github/

  2. Has anyone managed to make a message between different using : either using the same single computer and two different radios (on the same frequency), or using two rnode radios on 2 different computers connected by ? I seem to get this not working "out of the box" because of of lora packets of the two rnodes. Has anyone managed to bridge lora rnodes by putting in a transmission delay in e.g. ?

  3. Has anyone managed to make a message #bridge between different #spreadingfactor #sf #lora #rnodes using #reticulum #rns : either using the same single computer and two different #rnode radios (on the same frequency), or using two rnode radios on 2 different computers connected by #wifi? I seem to get this not working "out of the box" because of #collisions of lora packets of the two rnodes. Has anyone managed to bridge lora rnodes by putting in a transmission delay in #reticulum e.g. #meshchat ?

  4. Has anyone managed to make a message #bridge between different #spreadingfactor #sf #lora #rnodes using #reticulum #rns : either using the same single computer and two different #rnode radios (on the same frequency), or using two rnode radios on 2 different computers connected by #wifi? I seem to get this not working "out of the box" because of #collisions of lora packets of the two rnodes. Has anyone managed to bridge lora rnodes by putting in a transmission delay in #reticulum e.g. #meshchat ?

  5. Has anyone managed to make a message #bridge between different #spreadingfactor #sf #lora #rnodes using #reticulum #rns : either using the same single computer and two different #rnode radios (on the same frequency), or using two rnode radios on 2 different computers connected by #wifi? I seem to get this not working "out of the box" because of #collisions of lora packets of the two rnodes. Has anyone managed to bridge lora rnodes by putting in a transmission delay in #reticulum e.g. #meshchat ?

  6. Has anyone managed to make a message #bridge between different #spreadingfactor #sf #lora #rnodes using #reticulum #rns : either using the same single computer and two different #rnode radios (on the same frequency), or using two rnode radios on 2 different computers connected by #wifi? I seem to get this not working "out of the box" because of #collisions of lora packets of the two rnodes. Has anyone managed to bridge lora rnodes by putting in a transmission delay in #reticulum e.g. #meshchat ?

  7. If a instance with a address on one computing device has 4 identical interfaces, each with same settings of frequency , each rnode having a in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a () from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local at rnode 1 of different attempted signals of the other 3 near rnodes?

  8. If a #reticulum #meshchat instance with a #lxmf address on one computing device has 4 identical #lora #rnodes #rnode interfaces, each with same settings of frequency #spreadingfactor #sf, each rnode having a #directional #yagi #antenna in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a #deliveryconfirmation (#downlink) from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local #collision at rnode 1 of different attempted #acknowledgement signals of the other 3 near rnodes?

  9. If a #reticulum #meshchat instance with a #lxmf address on one computing device has 4 identical #lora #rnodes #rnode interfaces, each with same settings of frequency #spreadingfactor #sf, each rnode having a #directional #yagi #antenna in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a #deliveryconfirmation (#downlink) from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local #collision at rnode 1 of different attempted #acknowledgement signals of the other 3 near rnodes?

  10. If a #reticulum #meshchat instance with a #lxmf address on one computing device has 4 identical #lora #rnodes #rnode interfaces, each with same settings of frequency #spreadingfactor #sf, each rnode having a #directional #yagi #antenna in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a #deliveryconfirmation (#downlink) from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local #collision at rnode 1 of different attempted #acknowledgement signals of the other 3 near rnodes?

  11. If a #reticulum #meshchat instance with a #lxmf address on one computing device has 4 identical #lora #rnodes #rnode interfaces, each with same settings of frequency #spreadingfactor #sf, each rnode having a #directional #yagi #antenna in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a #deliveryconfirmation (#downlink) from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local #collision at rnode 1 of different attempted #acknowledgement signals of the other 3 near rnodes?

  12. Does a continue trying all alternative routes so long as a delivery is not confirmed, even for operating under ( ) ?

  13. Does a #rns #reticulum #mesh continue trying all alternative routes so long as a delivery is not confirmed, even for #radio #rnodes operating under #lora ( #ismband #869decimal525mhz ) ?
    #reticulumnetwork

  14. Does a #rns #reticulum #mesh continue trying all alternative routes so long as a delivery is not confirmed, even for #radio #rnodes operating under #lora ( #ismband #869decimal525mhz ) ?
    #reticulumnetwork

  15. Does a #rns #reticulum #mesh continue trying all alternative routes so long as a delivery is not confirmed, even for #radio #rnodes operating under #lora ( #ismband #869decimal525mhz ) ?
    #reticulumnetwork

  16. Is there a of a used with different numbers of for given ( ) & given payload size? Am interested to know what happens to the routing, & likelyhood of for small LoRa packets (max 2 blocks), for longest transmission times i.e. spreading factor 12 . Would like to know if my impressions, that SF 12 is very tricky under LoRa as compared with , have a clear explanation.

  17. Is there a #simulation of a #lora #reticulum #radio #mesh used with different numbers of #rnode #radio #nodes #rnodes for given #spreadingfactor ( #sf ) & given payload size? Am interested to know what happens to the routing, & likelyhood of #deliveryconfirmation for small LoRa packets (max 2 blocks), for longest transmission times i.e. spreading factor 12 #SF12 . Would like to know if my impressions, that SF 12 is very tricky under #RNS LoRa as compared with #SF10, have a clear explanation.

  18. Is there a #simulation of a #lora #reticulum #radio #mesh used with different numbers of #rnode #radio #nodes #rnodes for given #spreadingfactor ( #sf ) & given payload size? Am interested to know what happens to the routing, & likelyhood of #deliveryconfirmation for small LoRa packets (max 2 blocks), for longest transmission times i.e. spreading factor 12 #SF12 . Would like to know if my impressions, that SF 12 is very tricky under #RNS LoRa as compared with #SF10, have a clear explanation.

  19. Is there a #simulation of a #lora #reticulum #radio #mesh used with different numbers of #rnode #radio #nodes #rnodes for given #spreadingfactor ( #sf ) & given payload size? Am interested to know what happens to the routing, & likelyhood of #deliveryconfirmation for small LoRa packets (max 2 blocks), for longest transmission times i.e. spreading factor 12 #SF12 . Would like to know if my impressions, that SF 12 is very tricky under #RNS LoRa as compared with #SF10, have a clear explanation.

  20. Is there a #simulation of a #lora #reticulum #radio #mesh used with different numbers of #rnode #radio #nodes #rnodes for given #spreadingfactor ( #sf ) & given payload size? Am interested to know what happens to the routing, & likelyhood of #deliveryconfirmation for small LoRa packets (max 2 blocks), for longest transmission times i.e. spreading factor 12 #SF12 . Would like to know if my impressions, that SF 12 is very tricky under #RNS LoRa as compared with #SF10, have a clear explanation.

  21. With a & waveshare.com/wiki/USB_HUB_HAT possible to use 4 at same interface. Can use 4 different sets of radio parameters at one interface. Can use 1 radio with low for short transmissions at high data rate for large payloads like images or accessing and 1 with larger SF for longer range. No need to choose between presets meshtastic.org/docs/overview/r ! just use them all ! Magic

  22. With a #RaspberryPiZero2W & #usbhub waveshare.com/wiki/USB_HUB_HAT possible to use 4 #lora #radio #rnodes at same #reticulum #meshchat interface. Can use 4 different sets of radio parameters at one #LoRa #radio interface. Can use 1 radio with low #spreadingfactor #sf for short transmissions at high data rate for large payloads like images or accessing #nomadnet #pages and 1 with larger SF for longer range. No need to choose between #meshtasic presets meshtastic.org/docs/overview/r ! just use them all ! Magic

  23. With a #RaspberryPiZero2W & #usbhub waveshare.com/wiki/USB_HUB_HAT possible to use 4 #lora #radio #rnodes at same #reticulum #meshchat interface. Can use 4 different sets of radio parameters at one #LoRa #radio interface. Can use 1 radio with low #spreadingfactor #sf for short transmissions at high data rate for large payloads like images or accessing #nomadnet #pages and 1 with larger SF for longer range. No need to choose between #meshtasic presets meshtastic.org/docs/overview/r ! just use them all ! Magic

  24. With a #RaspberryPiZero2W & #usbhub waveshare.com/wiki/USB_HUB_HAT possible to use 4 #lora #radio #rnodes at same #reticulum #meshchat interface. Can use 4 different sets of radio parameters at one #LoRa #radio interface. Can use 1 radio with low #spreadingfactor #sf for short transmissions at high data rate for large payloads like images or accessing #nomadnet #pages and 1 with larger SF for longer range. No need to choose between #meshtasic presets meshtastic.org/docs/overview/r ! just use them all ! Magic

  25. With a #RaspberryPiZero2W & #usbhub waveshare.com/wiki/USB_HUB_HAT possible to use 4 #lora #radio #rnodes at same #reticulum #meshchat interface. Can use 4 different sets of radio parameters at one #LoRa #radio interface. Can use 1 radio with low #spreadingfactor #sf for short transmissions at high data rate for large payloads like images or accessing #nomadnet #pages and 1 with larger SF for longer range. No need to choose between #meshtasic presets meshtastic.org/docs/overview/r ! just use them all ! Magic

  26. Some interesting info about the effect of () in is in papers about SF pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ SF12 in & lora pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

    Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the delivery limit down github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob from the default 1 MB for those , of a set, with higher SF values?

  27. Some interesting info about the effect of #spreadingfactor (#SF) in #lora #radio #mesh is in papers about SF pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ SF12 in #lora & lora pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

    Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple #rnode interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the #LXMF delivery limit #DELIVERY_LIMIT down github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob from the default 1 MB for those #rnodes, of a set, with higher SF values?

  28. Some interesting info about the effect of #spreadingfactor (#SF) in #lora #radio #mesh is in papers about SF pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ SF12 in #lora & lora pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

    Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple #rnode interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the #LXMF delivery limit #DELIVERY_LIMIT down github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob from the default 1 MB for those #rnodes, of a set, with higher SF values?

  29. Some interesting info about the effect of #spreadingfactor (#SF) in #lora #radio #mesh is in papers about SF pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ SF12 in #lora & lora pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

    Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple #rnode interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the #LXMF delivery limit #DELIVERY_LIMIT down github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob from the default 1 MB for those #rnodes, of a set, with higher SF values?

  30. Some interesting info about the effect of #spreadingfactor (#SF) in #lora #radio #mesh is in papers about SF pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ SF12 in #lora & lora pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

    Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple #rnode interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the #LXMF delivery limit #DELIVERY_LIMIT down github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob from the default 1 MB for those #rnodes, of a set, with higher SF values?