#lxmf — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lxmf, aggregated by home.social.
-
continuing
.. https://youtu.be/lU5_SBdBkXY?si=y9yxhHgR7cY2-Q68 shows #sdr and #reticulum #lxmf messaging gui #dashboard with #RaspberryPiZero2W #raspberrypizero #lora -
If a #reticulum #meshchat instance with a #lxmf address on one computing device has 4 identical #lora #rnodes #rnode interfaces, each with same settings of frequency #spreadingfactor #sf, each rnode having a #directional #yagi #antenna in close vicinity, will transmission to a sender of a #deliveryconfirmation (#downlink) from 1 antenna to the sender's direction, be messed up due to local #collision at rnode 1 of different attempted #acknowledgement signals of the other 3 near rnodes?
-
Can one set the #lxmf #reticulum delivery limit in #reticulum #meshchat on a per #interface basis i.e. per connected #rnode interface? https://github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob/c426c93cc5d63a3dae18ad2264b1299a7ad9e46c/LXMF/LXMRouter.py#L38
#deliverylimit #DELIVERY_LIMIT
This might help stop #lora #radio channel blocking in case one #rnode of a set of #rnodes at one end-point device use a high #spreadingfactor #sf #lorachannelblocking -
Some interesting info about the effect of #spreadingfactor (#SF) in #lora #radio #mesh is in papers about SF https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8512894 SF12 in #lora & lora https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5038744
Can one influence the effectiveness of using multiple #rnode interfaces , in one single end-point location, with different SF by setting the #LXMF delivery limit #DELIVERY_LIMIT down https://github.com/markqvist/LXMF/blob/c426c93cc5d63a3dae18ad2264b1299a7ad9e46c/LXMF/LXMRouter.py#L38 from the default 1 MB for those #rnodes, of a set, with higher SF values?