#emotionalprocessing — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #emotionalprocessing, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: August 12, 2026 at 06:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Dogs can distinguish between specific negative human facial expressions, brain scans show
New research provides evidence that the canine brain not only separates human facial expressions by positive or negative emotion but also distinguishes between specific negative expressions. These distinct patterns of brain activity suggest that dogs have a nuanced neural representation of human emotions. The findings were recently published in the journal iScience.
Behavioral studies have documented that dogs observe and react to human emotional cues. Canines can distinguish between a smiling face and a neutral one. They often modify their behavior based on the emotional states of the humans around them.
Despite this observed flexibility, the exact brain processes supporting these abilities are not fully understood. Previous neuroimaging work mostly tested positive versus negative emotions or relied on images of the dogs’ caregivers. Because of this, it was not known if canine brains simply register a positive or negative state or if they can process the differences between distinct emotional expressions of the same valence.
To rule out the effect of familiarity, scientists designed a new experiment using only photographs of unfamiliar human faces. They aimed to map the specific neural mechanisms underlying how dogs process happy expressions. They also wanted to observe if the canine brain exhibits unique patterns of activity for different negative facial expressions.
In the first part of the study, the researchers recruited eight awake pet dogs, primarily border collies. The animals were trained to lie completely still inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. This device measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. During the brain scans, the dogs viewed alternating blocks of photographs showing strangers with either happy or neutral facial expressions.
The researchers matched the images for low-level visual properties like brightness and contrast to ensure the dogs were reacting to the emotions rather than simple lighting differences. The scans indicated that happy faces elicited stronger brain activity than neutral faces. This increased activity occurred in a large cluster located in the right temporal cortex that extended into the caudate nucleus.
The temporal cortex is an area associated with processing visual and social information. The caudate nucleus is a brain region typically linked to the processing of rewards. This pattern suggests that happy human faces, even those of strangers, function as rewarding social stimuli for dogs.
Next, the authors conducted a second experiment to test whether this specific brain region responds uniquely to happiness or just to emotional faces in general. They scanned twelve dogs, including some from the first group. This time, they showed the animals images of unfamiliar humans expressing happiness, anger, fear, and sadness.
The scientists used a machine learning computer model to analyze the brain data, restricting their focus only to the temporal-caudate region identified in the first experiment. The model analyzed the data and successfully distinguished the brain activity patterns of happiness from those of anger, fear, and sadness. The model performed better than chance only when happiness was one of the two emotions being compared.
When the model tried to distinguish between two negative expressions using only this brain region, the results were not statistically significant. This indicates that the right temporal-caudate network has a preferential responsiveness to happy human faces. It does not simply react to any emotional facial expression.
To find out if dogs can differentiate between the negative emotions, the researchers expanded their analysis to the entire brain. They looked for distributed patterns of activity that generalized across different images of the same emotion but varied between different emotions. They also used computational models of the early visual cortex to ensure that subtle visual shapes did not skew the data.
This whole-brain analysis provided evidence that dog brains distinguish between certain negative facial expressions. The researchers found that activity patterns in a region called the right rostral suprasylvian gyrus differentiated sadness from fear. A different set of regions, including the right mid ectosylvian gyrus and left splenial gyrus, differentiated anger from fear.
The scientists did not find distinct brain patterns that could separate sadness from anger. Distinguishing between these two negative emotions may require additional sensory information, such as body language or vocal cues. Overall, the distinct neural patterns related to fearful faces suggest that fear might hold a particular biological relevance for dogs compared to other negative emotions.
Reading these findings requires some caution regarding how canine perception is interpreted. The ability of the canine brain to separate these expressions neurologically does not mean that dogs experience or categorize emotions exactly as humans do. The labels of happiness, fear, anger, and sadness are human descriptions of the stimuli. They do not necessarily reflect a human-like semantic understanding of those feelings in the dogs’ minds.
The study sample also consisted largely of border collies, a breed known for its intense focus on human social cues. This high level of social tuning suggests that the findings might not apply equally to all canine breeds. Free-ranging dogs or breeds less oriented toward human interaction might process facial expressions differently.
The research relied on static photographs rather than real-world emotional events. In everyday life, dogs interpret dynamic facial movements paired with human body language, vocal tone, and scent. Future research plans to use more naturalistic, moving, and multisensory stimuli to observe how dogs integrate all of these social signals.
The study, “Dog brain representations of human facial expressions: Encoding happiness and differentiating specific negative expressions,” was authored by Raúl Hernández-Pérez, Luis Concha, Attila Andics, Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa, and Laura V. Cuaya.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DogBrain #CanineCognition #HumanFaces #EmotionalProcessing #HappyFace #NegativeExpressions #Neuroscience #fMRI #DogBehavior #PetResearch
-
DATE: August 12, 2026 at 06:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Dogs can distinguish between specific negative human facial expressions, brain scans show
New research provides evidence that the canine brain not only separates human facial expressions by positive or negative emotion but also distinguishes between specific negative expressions. These distinct patterns of brain activity suggest that dogs have a nuanced neural representation of human emotions. The findings were recently published in the journal iScience.
Behavioral studies have documented that dogs observe and react to human emotional cues. Canines can distinguish between a smiling face and a neutral one. They often modify their behavior based on the emotional states of the humans around them.
Despite this observed flexibility, the exact brain processes supporting these abilities are not fully understood. Previous neuroimaging work mostly tested positive versus negative emotions or relied on images of the dogs’ caregivers. Because of this, it was not known if canine brains simply register a positive or negative state or if they can process the differences between distinct emotional expressions of the same valence.
To rule out the effect of familiarity, scientists designed a new experiment using only photographs of unfamiliar human faces. They aimed to map the specific neural mechanisms underlying how dogs process happy expressions. They also wanted to observe if the canine brain exhibits unique patterns of activity for different negative facial expressions.
In the first part of the study, the researchers recruited eight awake pet dogs, primarily border collies. The animals were trained to lie completely still inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. This device measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. During the brain scans, the dogs viewed alternating blocks of photographs showing strangers with either happy or neutral facial expressions.
The researchers matched the images for low-level visual properties like brightness and contrast to ensure the dogs were reacting to the emotions rather than simple lighting differences. The scans indicated that happy faces elicited stronger brain activity than neutral faces. This increased activity occurred in a large cluster located in the right temporal cortex that extended into the caudate nucleus.
The temporal cortex is an area associated with processing visual and social information. The caudate nucleus is a brain region typically linked to the processing of rewards. This pattern suggests that happy human faces, even those of strangers, function as rewarding social stimuli for dogs.
Next, the authors conducted a second experiment to test whether this specific brain region responds uniquely to happiness or just to emotional faces in general. They scanned twelve dogs, including some from the first group. This time, they showed the animals images of unfamiliar humans expressing happiness, anger, fear, and sadness.
The scientists used a machine learning computer model to analyze the brain data, restricting their focus only to the temporal-caudate region identified in the first experiment. The model analyzed the data and successfully distinguished the brain activity patterns of happiness from those of anger, fear, and sadness. The model performed better than chance only when happiness was one of the two emotions being compared.
When the model tried to distinguish between two negative expressions using only this brain region, the results were not statistically significant. This indicates that the right temporal-caudate network has a preferential responsiveness to happy human faces. It does not simply react to any emotional facial expression.
To find out if dogs can differentiate between the negative emotions, the researchers expanded their analysis to the entire brain. They looked for distributed patterns of activity that generalized across different images of the same emotion but varied between different emotions. They also used computational models of the early visual cortex to ensure that subtle visual shapes did not skew the data.
This whole-brain analysis provided evidence that dog brains distinguish between certain negative facial expressions. The researchers found that activity patterns in a region called the right rostral suprasylvian gyrus differentiated sadness from fear. A different set of regions, including the right mid ectosylvian gyrus and left splenial gyrus, differentiated anger from fear.
The scientists did not find distinct brain patterns that could separate sadness from anger. Distinguishing between these two negative emotions may require additional sensory information, such as body language or vocal cues. Overall, the distinct neural patterns related to fearful faces suggest that fear might hold a particular biological relevance for dogs compared to other negative emotions.
Reading these findings requires some caution regarding how canine perception is interpreted. The ability of the canine brain to separate these expressions neurologically does not mean that dogs experience or categorize emotions exactly as humans do. The labels of happiness, fear, anger, and sadness are human descriptions of the stimuli. They do not necessarily reflect a human-like semantic understanding of those feelings in the dogs’ minds.
The study sample also consisted largely of border collies, a breed known for its intense focus on human social cues. This high level of social tuning suggests that the findings might not apply equally to all canine breeds. Free-ranging dogs or breeds less oriented toward human interaction might process facial expressions differently.
The research relied on static photographs rather than real-world emotional events. In everyday life, dogs interpret dynamic facial movements paired with human body language, vocal tone, and scent. Future research plans to use more naturalistic, moving, and multisensory stimuli to observe how dogs integrate all of these social signals.
The study, “Dog brain representations of human facial expressions: Encoding happiness and differentiating specific negative expressions,” was authored by Raúl Hernández-Pérez, Luis Concha, Attila Andics, Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa, and Laura V. Cuaya.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #DogBrain #CanineCognition #HumanFaces #EmotionalProcessing #HappyFace #NegativeExpressions #Neuroscience #fMRI #DogBehavior #PetResearch
-
DATE: July 28, 2026 at 12:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Trauma survivors process angry expressions differently on a subconscious level
Individuals who experienced childhood abuse might automatically pay more attention to expressions of anger, even when they are not trying to judge a person’s mood. A small study published in the journal Biological Psychology reveals that this heightened sensitivity to threatening facial cues occurs primarily during automatic brain processing. These distinct neural patterns could help explain why some survivors remain exceptionally vigilant in everyday social situations.
Lead author Tae Kyoung Lee and researcher Young Youn Kim, both based at the Department of Forensic Psychology at Kyonggi University in South Korea, designed the research to better understand how early adversity alters the nervous system. The researchers focused specifically on how the human brain processes facial expressions in real time. Facial expressions act as primary social signals, and reading them accurately serves as an essential part of navigating human relationships.
Child maltreatment includes physical violence, emotional manipulation, sexual assault, and neglect. Experiencing these stressful events during formative development frequently leads to chronic distress. In response to unpredictable or hostile environments, a child’s developing brain often adapts by becoming highly attuned to danger. This heightened sensitivity likely acts as a protective mechanism, allowing children to anticipate harm and attempt to avoid threatening situations.
While heightened vigilance serves a protective purpose in a hostile home, the same mental habit can cause problems in safe environments later in life. People with histories of early abuse often focus heavily on threat-related cues, such as angry expressions, long after the immediate danger has passed. Over time, this intense focus can contribute to anxiety, elevated stress, and difficulties in interpreting everyday social interactions.
Researchers distinguish between two ways the mind handles incoming emotional information. Explicit processing happens when a person actively thinks about a situation and evaluates it, such as consciously deciding if a coworker looks sad. Implicit processing occurs beneath the surface, when the brain registers emotional cues automatically while the person is focusing on something else entirely.
Previous research produced mixed results regarding how abused individuals process emotions at the neural level. Some experiments suggested that childhood trauma alters automatic emotional responses, while others found no differences when participants were asked to intentionally rate feelings. Lee and Kim noticed that most past experiments only tested one type of mental task at a time. The pair designed their study to monitor both automatic and intentional emotional evaluations in the exact same group of people.
To measure brain activity, the research team used electroencephalography, a tool that records electrical signals through tiny sensors placed on the scalp. The scientists focused on a specific pattern of brain activity known as the late positive potential. This electrical spike emerges roughly 300 milliseconds after a person sees a highly stimulating image. The late positive potential acts as an indicator of sustained attention, showing how long and how intensely the brain continues to devote mental resources to a piece of information.
The researchers began by screening 470 undergraduate students at their university using a standardized questionnaire about childhood trauma. From this large pool, they selected 23 individuals who reported moderate to severe experiences of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. They then matched this group with 23 control participants who reported no history of childhood maltreatment. With a total of 46 participants, this qualifies as a small study, categorized as an extreme-group design to highlight potential physiological differences.
Participants sat in front of a computer screen while the researchers recorded their brain waves. The students viewed a standardized series of facial photographs showing angry, happy, and neutral expressions. The experiment was divided into two distinct tasks to test the different ways the brain handles social data. Half of the experiment tested automatic mental processes, while the other half tested deliberate emotional judgments.
During the first portion, participants were solely asked to identify the gender of the faces on the screen. They pressed one key for a male face and another for a female face. In this scenario, the emotion shown on the face was irrelevant to the objective. This setup allowed the researchers to measure implicit emotional processing, capturing how the brain reacts to anger or happiness when attention is directed elsewhere.
The second task required participants to actively evaluate the emotions displayed on the screen. Instead of noting gender, the students had to press specific keys to categorize each face as either emotional or neutral. This explicit processing task forced participants to consciously analyze the expressions. By comparing the brain waves across both tasks, the team could identify exactly when past trauma influences visual attention.
The experiment generated two distinct types of data for the team to analyze. The behavioral results included the accuracy of the participants’ button presses and their physical reaction speeds. The neural results came from the continuous electrical brain wave recordings gathered throughout the trials. The team looked for patterns showing increased or decreased attentional engagement when viewing the different feelings.
On a behavioral level, the two groups performed similarly. Both the abused participants and the controls made few errors and responded at comparable speeds. Across the board, participants took slightly longer to categorize angry and neutral faces than happy ones during the explicit task. Because behavioral actions were nearly identical between the groups, the electrical recordings were needed to reveal what was happening below the surface.
Marked differences emerged in the brain wave data during the implicit task. When individuals in the childhood abuse group evaluated the gender of an angry face, their brain waves showed a large spike in the late positive potential. This electrical surge was noticeably larger than the response recorded in the control group. The abused participants did not exhibit this heightened pattern when looking at happy or neutral faces.
This localized surge of electrical activity suggests that the abused participants’ brains automatically locked onto the angry expressions. Even though their assigned goal was just to identify the gender of the photograph, their attention systems were still hijacked by the threat-related cue. The control participants processed the angry faces without dedicating extra sustained attention to them. The researchers propose that childhood abuse trains the brain to remain on the lookout for aggressive emotions at an automatic level.
The brain wave patterns shifted entirely during the explicit task. When participants actively judged the emotional state of the faces, the strong divide between the abused group and the control group disappeared. Both groups displayed similar late positive potential amplitudes during this deliberate evaluation. The findings from this section of the experiment were not statistically significant regarding group differences.
An unexpected detail emerged during the explicit emotion-recognition task. Both groups actually showed the highest levels of sustained attention when viewing neutral faces, rather than angry or happy ones. The researchers suggest that neutral expressions can be ambiguous. When forced to categorize ambiguous social cues, the human brain likely works harder and recruits more cognitive resources to figure out what the expression really means.
The contrast between the two tasks provides a new lens for understanding trauma survivors’ social experiences. The data imply that a history of abuse does not necessarily alter a person’s ability to consciously evaluate emotions. Instead, the differences lie in how their brains automatically filter the environment. Traces of past trauma seem to manifest as an involuntary reflex that rapidly prioritizes signs of hostility.
The researchers noted a few caveats regarding their methodology. The relatively small sample size limits the ability to generalize the conclusions to the broader population. Because the participants were exclusively university students, they might not represent the neural patterns of individuals who suffer from severe clinical distress. Replicating the experiment with a larger and more medically diverse group would help verify the patterns seen in this initial data.
Relying on retrospective self-reports for trauma histories also presents a common challenge in this field. Participants might underreport or misremember the severity of the abuse they endured during childhood. The researchers grouped instances of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse together. Looking into specific categories of trauma in the future might reveal distinct neurological adaptations tied to different types of childhood adversity.
Despite these limitations, the findings paint a detailed picture of the brain’s protective adaptations. An automatic sensitivity to anger might have kept a child safe in a chaotic home environment. By understanding how these hidden attentional habits persist into adulthood, medical professionals can eventually design better therapies to help people reset their nervous systems for a safer reality.
The study, “Enhanced LPP responses to the angry faces in individuals with a history of childhood abuse during the implicit emotion categorization task,” was authored by Tae Kyoung Lee and Young Youn Kim.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #trauma #childhoodabuse #emotionalprocessing #angerrecognition #implicitprocessing #latepositivepotential #neuroscience #anxiety #socialcognition #psychologyresearch
-
DATE: July 28, 2026 at 12:00PM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Trauma survivors process angry expressions differently on a subconscious level
Individuals who experienced childhood abuse might automatically pay more attention to expressions of anger, even when they are not trying to judge a person’s mood. A small study published in the journal Biological Psychology reveals that this heightened sensitivity to threatening facial cues occurs primarily during automatic brain processing. These distinct neural patterns could help explain why some survivors remain exceptionally vigilant in everyday social situations.
Lead author Tae Kyoung Lee and researcher Young Youn Kim, both based at the Department of Forensic Psychology at Kyonggi University in South Korea, designed the research to better understand how early adversity alters the nervous system. The researchers focused specifically on how the human brain processes facial expressions in real time. Facial expressions act as primary social signals, and reading them accurately serves as an essential part of navigating human relationships.
Child maltreatment includes physical violence, emotional manipulation, sexual assault, and neglect. Experiencing these stressful events during formative development frequently leads to chronic distress. In response to unpredictable or hostile environments, a child’s developing brain often adapts by becoming highly attuned to danger. This heightened sensitivity likely acts as a protective mechanism, allowing children to anticipate harm and attempt to avoid threatening situations.
While heightened vigilance serves a protective purpose in a hostile home, the same mental habit can cause problems in safe environments later in life. People with histories of early abuse often focus heavily on threat-related cues, such as angry expressions, long after the immediate danger has passed. Over time, this intense focus can contribute to anxiety, elevated stress, and difficulties in interpreting everyday social interactions.
Researchers distinguish between two ways the mind handles incoming emotional information. Explicit processing happens when a person actively thinks about a situation and evaluates it, such as consciously deciding if a coworker looks sad. Implicit processing occurs beneath the surface, when the brain registers emotional cues automatically while the person is focusing on something else entirely.
Previous research produced mixed results regarding how abused individuals process emotions at the neural level. Some experiments suggested that childhood trauma alters automatic emotional responses, while others found no differences when participants were asked to intentionally rate feelings. Lee and Kim noticed that most past experiments only tested one type of mental task at a time. The pair designed their study to monitor both automatic and intentional emotional evaluations in the exact same group of people.
To measure brain activity, the research team used electroencephalography, a tool that records electrical signals through tiny sensors placed on the scalp. The scientists focused on a specific pattern of brain activity known as the late positive potential. This electrical spike emerges roughly 300 milliseconds after a person sees a highly stimulating image. The late positive potential acts as an indicator of sustained attention, showing how long and how intensely the brain continues to devote mental resources to a piece of information.
The researchers began by screening 470 undergraduate students at their university using a standardized questionnaire about childhood trauma. From this large pool, they selected 23 individuals who reported moderate to severe experiences of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. They then matched this group with 23 control participants who reported no history of childhood maltreatment. With a total of 46 participants, this qualifies as a small study, categorized as an extreme-group design to highlight potential physiological differences.
Participants sat in front of a computer screen while the researchers recorded their brain waves. The students viewed a standardized series of facial photographs showing angry, happy, and neutral expressions. The experiment was divided into two distinct tasks to test the different ways the brain handles social data. Half of the experiment tested automatic mental processes, while the other half tested deliberate emotional judgments.
During the first portion, participants were solely asked to identify the gender of the faces on the screen. They pressed one key for a male face and another for a female face. In this scenario, the emotion shown on the face was irrelevant to the objective. This setup allowed the researchers to measure implicit emotional processing, capturing how the brain reacts to anger or happiness when attention is directed elsewhere.
The second task required participants to actively evaluate the emotions displayed on the screen. Instead of noting gender, the students had to press specific keys to categorize each face as either emotional or neutral. This explicit processing task forced participants to consciously analyze the expressions. By comparing the brain waves across both tasks, the team could identify exactly when past trauma influences visual attention.
The experiment generated two distinct types of data for the team to analyze. The behavioral results included the accuracy of the participants’ button presses and their physical reaction speeds. The neural results came from the continuous electrical brain wave recordings gathered throughout the trials. The team looked for patterns showing increased or decreased attentional engagement when viewing the different feelings.
On a behavioral level, the two groups performed similarly. Both the abused participants and the controls made few errors and responded at comparable speeds. Across the board, participants took slightly longer to categorize angry and neutral faces than happy ones during the explicit task. Because behavioral actions were nearly identical between the groups, the electrical recordings were needed to reveal what was happening below the surface.
Marked differences emerged in the brain wave data during the implicit task. When individuals in the childhood abuse group evaluated the gender of an angry face, their brain waves showed a large spike in the late positive potential. This electrical surge was noticeably larger than the response recorded in the control group. The abused participants did not exhibit this heightened pattern when looking at happy or neutral faces.
This localized surge of electrical activity suggests that the abused participants’ brains automatically locked onto the angry expressions. Even though their assigned goal was just to identify the gender of the photograph, their attention systems were still hijacked by the threat-related cue. The control participants processed the angry faces without dedicating extra sustained attention to them. The researchers propose that childhood abuse trains the brain to remain on the lookout for aggressive emotions at an automatic level.
The brain wave patterns shifted entirely during the explicit task. When participants actively judged the emotional state of the faces, the strong divide between the abused group and the control group disappeared. Both groups displayed similar late positive potential amplitudes during this deliberate evaluation. The findings from this section of the experiment were not statistically significant regarding group differences.
An unexpected detail emerged during the explicit emotion-recognition task. Both groups actually showed the highest levels of sustained attention when viewing neutral faces, rather than angry or happy ones. The researchers suggest that neutral expressions can be ambiguous. When forced to categorize ambiguous social cues, the human brain likely works harder and recruits more cognitive resources to figure out what the expression really means.
The contrast between the two tasks provides a new lens for understanding trauma survivors’ social experiences. The data imply that a history of abuse does not necessarily alter a person’s ability to consciously evaluate emotions. Instead, the differences lie in how their brains automatically filter the environment. Traces of past trauma seem to manifest as an involuntary reflex that rapidly prioritizes signs of hostility.
The researchers noted a few caveats regarding their methodology. The relatively small sample size limits the ability to generalize the conclusions to the broader population. Because the participants were exclusively university students, they might not represent the neural patterns of individuals who suffer from severe clinical distress. Replicating the experiment with a larger and more medically diverse group would help verify the patterns seen in this initial data.
Relying on retrospective self-reports for trauma histories also presents a common challenge in this field. Participants might underreport or misremember the severity of the abuse they endured during childhood. The researchers grouped instances of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse together. Looking into specific categories of trauma in the future might reveal distinct neurological adaptations tied to different types of childhood adversity.
Despite these limitations, the findings paint a detailed picture of the brain’s protective adaptations. An automatic sensitivity to anger might have kept a child safe in a chaotic home environment. By understanding how these hidden attentional habits persist into adulthood, medical professionals can eventually design better therapies to help people reset their nervous systems for a safer reality.
The study, “Enhanced LPP responses to the angry faces in individuals with a history of childhood abuse during the implicit emotion categorization task,” was authored by Tae Kyoung Lee and Young Youn Kim.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #trauma #childhoodabuse #emotionalprocessing #angerrecognition #implicitprocessing #latepositivepotential #neuroscience #anxiety #socialcognition #psychologyresearch
-
Do you ever sit with an emotion so enormous it feels like it could swallow you whole? I’ve learned to let it spill onto the page—lines, colors, textures. Somehow, making it visible makes it less heavy. If this resonates, you can find more of this over at the site if you're curious. 🌿
-
Unraveling Consciousness: Neurophysiology, Brainwaves, and Interoception
#Neuroscience #BrainScience #EmotionalProcessing #MindAndBody #Neurophysiology #BrainWaves #Interoception #Consciousness #Neurochemistry #MentalHealth
-
The Neural Blueprint of Social Life: Insights from Animal Models and Human Research
#SocialNeuroscience #BrainResearch #NeuralNetworks #EmotionalProcessing #Neuroplasticity #BrainScience #NeuroscienceExplained #MentalHealth #Neuroethics #BrainAndBehavior
-
Unlocking the Secrets of the Mind: Neuro-Philosophy and Emotional Processing
#NeuroPhilosophy #EmotionalProcessing #BrainScience #PrefrontalCortex #Amygdala #CulturalPsychology #Neuroscience #MindMatters #EmotionsExplained #BrainFacts #Psychology #EmotionalIntelligence #CognitiveScience #ScienceOfEmotion #MentalHealth
-
Long-term practitioners of Orgasmic Meditation show unique brain activity patterns https://www.psypost.org/long-term-practitioners-of-orgasmic-meditation-show-unique-brain-activity-patterns/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #OrgasmicMeditation #Mindfulness #BrainActivity #SensoryAwareness #EmotionalProcessing
-
Antidepressant escitalopram boosts amygdala activity https://www.psypost.org/antidepressant-escitalopram-boosts-amygdala-activity/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #antidepressant #escitalopram #amygdala #emotionalprocessing #mentalhealth
-
Researchers identify brain activity patterns linked to movie genre preferences https://www.psypost.org/researchers-identify-brain-activity-patterns-linked-to-movie-genre-preferences/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #MovieGenre #BrainActivityPatterns #Research #EmotionalProcessing #GenreEnjoyment
-
My siblings in Dionysus, you must make jokes.
-
My siblings in Dionysus, you must make jokes.
-
One thing that has been weighing on me lately is how much other people’s perception of mediffers from how I view myself. I believe I’m a very compassionate, caring, generous person who usually puts other people’s needs above my own. Maybe some of this is a personality developed from trauma, but I believe who I am at my core is also very generous and loving. I feel emotions very deeply, but I am also logical. In cases where I’m unable to externally process around people, my rational and logical thoughts may not be apparent. My internal experience isn’t necessarily obvious to those around me. It’s weird, though, feeling like other people don’t really see the real me. I don’t claim to know exactly how others perceive me, but some things I’ve heard are that I am intimidating, demanding, judgmental, a confident person who takes charge and goes for what she wants, but also overly sensitive, and a drama queen.
If others feel I hold them to high standards, they should know my standards for myself are even higher. Being a good, honest, compassionate person is very important to me. This likely stems from a belief that I’m not allowed to have needs, that my value is only found in what I can do for other people. Growing up, I was always very aware of how much of a burden I was, for things beyond my control. When my parents got divorced, I was the person my mom talked to about everything. I felt responsible for her wellbeing, and I wanted to do anything I could to please both her and my father. This still affects me to this day, both in how I treat myself and how I treat others. I couldn’t make my parents happy, and I can’t make my friends happy either.
It’s always such a shock to the system to learn that despite my good intentions, I am the villain in other people’s story. They don’t see me for me. When things fall apart, I’m blamed for everything that went wrong, and they’re just a victim who fell into some supposed trap. They don’t see their flaws as easily as they see mine; they don’t notice how their actions influenced the negative outcome. Regardless of how much I did for them, it’s never enough. And yet, who I am is always too much: too much anxiety, too much trauma, too many “expectations.” The saying, “If I’m too much, go find less” applies, but how do I learn to not care? How do I avoid internalizing things that are said about me?
I’ve taken many people into my home over the years, believing I was helping them. Most people ended their stay here hating me, seeing me as crazy, or even as just a bad person. In most cases, allowing people to stay here was not what I wanted and did not benefit me. I prioritized their needs and comfort; they chose to come here; yet, I’m still the villain in their story.
People say not to let other people tell you who you are, but I’ve been told many times throughout my life that my perception of events is wrong. When others’ version of reality clashes with mine, and their perception of me conflicts with who I am, how do I learn to trust myself? If I try to put good intentions out into the world, yet it’s perceived differently, then haven’t I failed? Why even try with people if it gets me nowhere?
Someone I attempted to help years ago is actively telling people I’m a horrible person. I apparently hurt a friend years ago and had no idea until she came back into my life recently. Someone else avoided talking to me about issues she was having, and ultimately ended up ghosting me. I recently discovered someone I considered a close friend blocked me, because she blames me for a situation that didn’t involve me. Even though I tried to support her and do right by her at every turn, she still doesn’t want me in her life. It’s heartbreaking.
All I want is to live a peaceful life with a few people who love me, in an environment where we all support each other and make each other’s lives easier. Yet, I can’t seem to avoid hurting people, and ultimately losing them. I feel like my pure intentions should be obvious to anyone who interacts with me, but they don’t notice and it hurts. Even people who have known me for years don’t value what I have to offer. I don’t know how to bridge this gap, to be the person other people need me to be. It would seem I can’t, so I’ll just be grateful for the people I have right now. I have to let people come and go as they please, even when it hurts. I have to accept that I will be the villain in people’s story when they refuse to take accountability, develop self-awareness, and work on themselves. All I can do is continue trying to be a good person, try to avoid putting myself into bad situations for other people’s benefit, and just give myself compassion for the grief I feel for the people I’ve lost. Everything happens for a reason, and every situation has taught me something. I am grateful for every lesson I’ve learned, for every person who has come into my life and left footprints on my heart.
To those I’ve hurt, I’m truly sorry. No one is perfect, and I’m certainly no exception. I’ve made many mistakes, been horrible at communication, shut down from stress when others needed me to spring into action. I’m sorry I couldn’t be the support you needed when you needed, but I hope you know my intentions were always pure. I would never intentionally hurt anyone. I love you and wish you nothing but the best in life. Thank you for everything you taught me, thank you for allowing me into your life for a short time. My hope is that healing finds its way to you, each and every one of you who I’ve hurt. Thank you for reading this.
#community #emotionalProcessing #friendship #growth #healing #HealingJourney #mentalHealth #support
-
“Once you lose the person you love to most…
…it changes you.”
Thanks to #KnowledgeBlindness, I memoryholed this movie on #Netflix.
-
“Once you lose the person you love to most…
…it changes you.”
Thanks to #KnowledgeBlindness, I memoryholed this movie on #Netflix.
-
"Vengeance is the laziest form of grief."
-
"Vengeance is the laziest form of grief."
-
“I altered my spiel to include a sentence about not wanting to hear about different losses: ‘I don’t give a shit about your favorite cat who died, or your grandma who died, or your uncle who had a heart attack at 60.’ I have a dark, blunt sense of humor, so this part of the spiel invariably got some much-needed laughs. But it was also effective.”
-
Another day, another #wip inching closer to completion.
A lot of emotions and energy tied up in this one, as I found myself considering perceptions of relationships and living situations I find myself in... Heavy work where words sometimes fail.
-
Another day, another #wip inching closer to completion.
A lot of emotions and energy tied up in this one, as I found myself considering perceptions of relationships and living situations I find myself in... Heavy work where words sometimes fail.
-
Autistic emotional processing in a pandemic and the importance of guilt-free decompression.
https://soniaboue.wordpress.com/2020/07/11/autistic-emotional-processing-in-a-pandemic-and-the-importance-of-guilt-free-decompression/
#EmotionalProcessing #Easinglockdown #Uncategorized #Lockdown #COVID19 #Autism #Art