home.social

#newpaper — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #newpaper, aggregated by home.social.

  1. This week LTG Oslo members will be attending #LREC2026 in Mallorca to present several new papers . #NLProc
    Come chat with us and check out our papers now available from the conference proceedings (lrec.elra.info/conference/2026)👇🧵

    #conference #NewPaper

  2. This week LTG Oslo members will be attending #LREC2026 in Mallorca to present several new papers . #NLProc
    Come chat with us and check out our papers now available from the conference proceedings (lrec.elra.info/conference/2026)👇🧵

    #conference #NewPaper

  3. This week LTG Oslo members will be attending #LREC2026 in Mallorca to present several new papers . #NLProc
    Come chat with us and check out our papers now available from the conference proceedings (lrec.elra.info/conference/2026)👇🧵

    #conference #NewPaper

  4. This week LTG Oslo members will be attending #LREC2026 in Mallorca to present several new papers . #NLProc
    Come chat with us and check out our papers now available from the conference proceedings (lrec.elra.info/conference/2026)👇🧵

    #conference #NewPaper

  5. This week LTG Oslo members will be attending #LREC2026 in Mallorca to present several new papers . #NLProc
    Come chat with us and check out our papers now available from the conference proceedings (lrec.elra.info/conference/2026)👇🧵

    #conference #NewPaper

  6. #NewPaper out: Twenty-five years of Neobiota: building a community for invasion science in Europe and beyond by Ingo Kowarik and many great colleagues @TheresaHenke

    #alienspecies #biologicalinvasions #neobiota

    neobiota.pensoft.net/article/1

  7. #NewPaper out: Twenty-five years of Neobiota: building a community for invasion science in Europe and beyond by Ingo Kowarik and many great colleagues @TheresaHenke

    #alienspecies #biologicalinvasions #neobiota

    neobiota.pensoft.net/article/1

  8. #NewPaper out: Twenty-five years of Neobiota: building a community for invasion science in Europe and beyond by Ingo Kowarik and many great colleagues @TheresaHenke

    #alienspecies #biologicalinvasions #neobiota

    neobiota.pensoft.net/article/1

  9. #NewPaper out: Twenty-five years of Neobiota: building a community for invasion science in Europe and beyond by Ingo Kowarik and many great colleagues @TheresaHenke

    #alienspecies #biologicalinvasions #neobiota

    neobiota.pensoft.net/article/1

  10. #NewPaper out: Twenty-five years of Neobiota: building a community for invasion science in Europe and beyond by Ingo Kowarik and many great colleagues @TheresaHenke

    #alienspecies #biologicalinvasions #neobiota

    neobiota.pensoft.net/article/1

  11. I came across this excellent paper on the philosophical underpinnings of Machine Learning (as a discipline). It's well worth a read.

    arxiv.org/abs/2604.06754

    The summary (from the paper) is:

    Machine learning is a style of reasoning, and is as rhetorical as any other. It

    • Takes data as fact (not a core object of enquiry)
    • Presumes the data is “random” (as an omnibus sanitisation protocol)
    • Purports to learn representations of the world (from the “intrinsic structure of data”)
    • Presumes that knowing the world suffices to control it
    • Takes categories as features of the world (to avoid grappling with the hard choice)
    • Avoids grappling with the tension between the individual and the aggregate
    • Confuses and conflates data and information
    • Valorises method above all
    • Judges methods solely via canned “benchmarks”
    • Makes black boxes, without providing the associated data-sheets.
    • Construes its products as fully autonomous, when it is mere partial delegation.

    It has honed its style of reasoning so that the style is invisible. It has thus successfully turned itself into a self-perpetuating thought-style — in other words, a “discipline”.

    #ML #MachineLearning #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #assumptions #philosophy #rhetoric #NewPaper

  12. I came across this excellent paper on the philosophical underpinnings of Machine Learning (as a discipline). It's well worth a read.

    arxiv.org/abs/2604.06754

    The summary (from the paper) is:

    Machine learning is a style of reasoning, and is as rhetorical as any other. It

    • Takes data as fact (not a core object of enquiry)
    • Presumes the data is “random” (as an omnibus sanitisation protocol)
    • Purports to learn representations of the world (from the “intrinsic structure of data”)
    • Presumes that knowing the world suffices to control it
    • Takes categories as features of the world (to avoid grappling with the hard choice)
    • Avoids grappling with the tension between the individual and the aggregate
    • Confuses and conflates data and information
    • Valorises method above all
    • Judges methods solely via canned “benchmarks”
    • Makes black boxes, without providing the associated data-sheets.
    • Construes its products as fully autonomous, when it is mere partial delegation.

    It has honed its style of reasoning so that the style is invisible. It has thus successfully turned itself into a self-perpetuating thought-style — in other words, a “discipline”.

    #ML #MachineLearning #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #assumptions #philosophy #rhetoric #NewPaper

  13. I came across this excellent paper on the philosophical underpinnings of Machine Learning (as a discipline). It's well worth a read.

    arxiv.org/abs/2604.06754

    The summary (from the paper) is:

    Machine learning is a style of reasoning, and is as rhetorical as any other. It

    • Takes data as fact (not a core object of enquiry)
    • Presumes the data is “random” (as an omnibus sanitisation protocol)
    • Purports to learn representations of the world (from the “intrinsic structure of data”)
    • Presumes that knowing the world suffices to control it
    • Takes categories as features of the world (to avoid grappling with the hard choice)
    • Avoids grappling with the tension between the individual and the aggregate
    • Confuses and conflates data and information
    • Valorises method above all
    • Judges methods solely via canned “benchmarks”
    • Makes black boxes, without providing the associated data-sheets.
    • Construes its products as fully autonomous, when it is mere partial delegation.

    It has honed its style of reasoning so that the style is invisible. It has thus successfully turned itself into a self-perpetuating thought-style — in other words, a “discipline”.

    #ML #MachineLearning #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #assumptions #philosophy #rhetoric #NewPaper

  14. I came across this excellent paper on the philosophical underpinnings of Machine Learning (as a discipline). It's well worth a read.

    arxiv.org/abs/2604.06754

    The summary (from the paper) is:

    Machine learning is a style of reasoning, and is as rhetorical as any other. It

    • Takes data as fact (not a core object of enquiry)
    • Presumes the data is “random” (as an omnibus sanitisation protocol)
    • Purports to learn representations of the world (from the “intrinsic structure of data”)
    • Presumes that knowing the world suffices to control it
    • Takes categories as features of the world (to avoid grappling with the hard choice)
    • Avoids grappling with the tension between the individual and the aggregate
    • Confuses and conflates data and information
    • Valorises method above all
    • Judges methods solely via canned “benchmarks”
    • Makes black boxes, without providing the associated data-sheets.
    • Construes its products as fully autonomous, when it is mere partial delegation.

    It has honed its style of reasoning so that the style is invisible. It has thus successfully turned itself into a self-perpetuating thought-style — in other words, a “discipline”.

    #ML #MachineLearning #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #assumptions #philosophy #rhetoric #NewPaper

  15. I came across this excellent paper on the philosophical underpinnings of Machine Learning (as a discipline). It's well worth a read.

    arxiv.org/abs/2604.06754

    The summary (from the paper) is:

    Machine learning is a style of reasoning, and is as rhetorical as any other. It

    • Takes data as fact (not a core object of enquiry)
    • Presumes the data is “random” (as an omnibus sanitisation protocol)
    • Purports to learn representations of the world (from the “intrinsic structure of data”)
    • Presumes that knowing the world suffices to control it
    • Takes categories as features of the world (to avoid grappling with the hard choice)
    • Avoids grappling with the tension between the individual and the aggregate
    • Confuses and conflates data and information
    • Valorises method above all
    • Judges methods solely via canned “benchmarks”
    • Makes black boxes, without providing the associated data-sheets.
    • Construes its products as fully autonomous, when it is mere partial delegation.

    It has honed its style of reasoning so that the style is invisible. It has thus successfully turned itself into a self-perpetuating thought-style — in other words, a “discipline”.

    #ML #MachineLearning #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #assumptions #philosophy #rhetoric #NewPaper

  16. Thrilled to finally share the paper @deepseek and I cooked up: a formal framework where the Special Orthogonal Group of Existentialism determines whether you’re ↑ or ↓.

    Yes, there’s a Dasein Potential. Yes, the math checks out. 😎

    👉 johnmackay.net/grand-unified-t

    #AcademicHumor #NewPaper #HermeneuticMechanics #Philosophy

  17. Thrilled to finally share the paper @deepseek and I cooked up: a formal framework where the Special Orthogonal Group of Existentialism determines whether you’re ↑ or ↓.

    Yes, there’s a Dasein Potential. Yes, the math checks out. 😎

    👉 johnmackay.net/grand-unified-t

    #AcademicHumor #NewPaper #HermeneuticMechanics #Philosophy

  18. Thrilled to finally share the paper @deepseek and I cooked up: a formal framework where the Special Orthogonal Group of Existentialism determines whether you’re ↑ or ↓.

    Yes, there’s a Dasein Potential. Yes, the math checks out. 😎

    👉 johnmackay.net/grand-unified-t

    #AcademicHumor #NewPaper #HermeneuticMechanics #Philosophy

  19. Thrilled to finally share the paper @deepseek and I cooked up: a formal framework where the Special Orthogonal Group of Existentialism determines whether you’re ↑ or ↓.

    Yes, there’s a Dasein Potential. Yes, the math checks out. 😎

    👉 johnmackay.net/grand-unified-t

    #AcademicHumor #NewPaper #HermeneuticMechanics #Philosophy

  20. Thrilled to finally share the paper @deepseek and I cooked up: a formal framework where the Special Orthogonal Group of Existentialism determines whether you’re ↑ or ↓.

    Yes, there’s a Dasein Potential. Yes, the math checks out. 😎

    👉 johnmackay.net/grand-unified-t

    #AcademicHumor #NewPaper #HermeneuticMechanics #Philosophy

  21. New paper out:
    Daniel Kissling, Henrique Pereira and many nice colleagues: Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring.

    nature.com/articles/s44358-026

    #biodiversity #monitoring #Europe #newpaper #newpublication
    #xp

  22. New paper out:
    Daniel Kissling, Henrique Pereira and many nice colleagues: Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring.

    nature.com/articles/s44358-026

    #biodiversity #monitoring #Europe #newpaper #newpublication
    #xp

  23. New paper out:
    Daniel Kissling, Henrique Pereira and many nice colleagues: Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring.

    nature.com/articles/s44358-026

    #biodiversity #monitoring #Europe #newpaper #newpublication
    #xp

  24. New paper out:
    Daniel Kissling, Henrique Pereira and many nice colleagues: Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring.

    nature.com/articles/s44358-026

    #biodiversity #monitoring #Europe #newpaper #newpublication
    #xp

  25. New paper out:
    Daniel Kissling, Henrique Pereira and many nice colleagues: Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring.

    nature.com/articles/s44358-026

    #biodiversity #monitoring #Europe #newpaper #newpublication
    #xp

  26. Anyone interested in ocean skin temperatures derived from microwave imagers? #NewPaper

    This is the last in the series where we look at the uncoupled system - it's all or nothing from here on!

    rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

  27. Anyone interested in ocean skin temperatures derived from microwave imagers? #NewPaper

    This is the last in the series where we look at the uncoupled system - it's all or nothing from here on!

    rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

  28. Anyone interested in ocean skin temperatures derived from microwave imagers? #NewPaper

    This is the last in the series where we look at the uncoupled system - it's all or nothing from here on!

    rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

  29. Anyone interested in ocean skin temperatures derived from microwave imagers? #NewPaper

    This is the last in the series where we look at the uncoupled system - it's all or nothing from here on!

    rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

  30. Anyone interested in ocean skin temperatures derived from microwave imagers? #NewPaper

    This is the last in the series where we look at the uncoupled system - it's all or nothing from here on!

    rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

  31. #NewPaper #Mammalogy #InnerEar #Evolution #Ruminants

    Mennecart, B., Dziomber, L., Aiglstorfer, M. et al. Ruminant inner ear shape records 35 million years of neutral evolution. Nat Commun 13, 7222 (2022). doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-346

  32. #NewPaper #Mammalogy #InnerEar #Evolution #Ruminants

    Mennecart, B., Dziomber, L., Aiglstorfer, M. et al. Ruminant inner ear shape records 35 million years of neutral evolution. Nat Commun 13, 7222 (2022). doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-346

  33. #NewPaper #Mammalogy #InnerEar #Evolution #Ruminants

    Mennecart, B., Dziomber, L., Aiglstorfer, M. et al. Ruminant inner ear shape records 35 million years of neutral evolution. Nat Commun 13, 7222 (2022). doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-346

  34. GeoAdapt: Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaption in LiDAR Place Recognition Using Geometric Priors

    LiDAR place recognition with domain adaptation/transfer using target pseudo-labels generated by a discriminator (trained on source domain).

    Summary: huggingface.co/papers/2308.046
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.04638

    #arXiv #NewPaper #VPR

  35. GeoAdapt: Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaption in LiDAR Place Recognition Using Geometric Priors

    LiDAR place recognition with domain adaptation/transfer using target pseudo-labels generated by a discriminator (trained on source domain).

    Summary: huggingface.co/papers/2308.046
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.04638

    #arXiv #NewPaper #VPR

  36. GeoAdapt: Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaption in LiDAR Place Recognition Using Geometric Priors

    LiDAR place recognition with domain adaptation/transfer using target pseudo-labels generated by a discriminator (trained on source domain).

    Summary: huggingface.co/papers/2308.046
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.04638

    #arXiv #NewPaper #VPR

  37. GeoAdapt: Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaption in LiDAR Place Recognition Using Geometric Priors

    LiDAR place recognition with domain adaptation/transfer using target pseudo-labels generated by a discriminator (trained on source domain).

    Summary: huggingface.co/papers/2308.046
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.04638

    #arXiv #NewPaper #VPR

  38. Visual Geo-localization with Self-supervised Representation Learning

    SSL losses can be used for Visual Geo-localization/representation learning for VPR.

    My summary on HFPapers: huggingface.co/papers/2308.000
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.00090

    #arxiv #newpaper #vpr #ssl

  39. Visual Geo-localization with Self-supervised Representation Learning

    SSL losses can be used for Visual Geo-localization/representation learning for VPR.

    My summary on HFPapers: huggingface.co/papers/2308.000
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.00090

    #arxiv #newpaper #vpr #ssl

  40. Visual Geo-localization with Self-supervised Representation Learning

    SSL losses can be used for Visual Geo-localization/representation learning for VPR.

    My summary on HFPapers: huggingface.co/papers/2308.000
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.00090

    #arxiv #newpaper #vpr #ssl

  41. Visual Geo-localization with Self-supervised Representation Learning

    SSL losses can be used for Visual Geo-localization/representation learning for VPR.

    My summary on HFPapers: huggingface.co/papers/2308.000
    arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2308.00090

    #arxiv #newpaper #vpr #ssl

  42. #NewPaper #Paleontology #MassExtinctions

    Thomas J Algeo, Jun Shen, Theory and classification of mass extinction causation, National Science Review, 2023;, nwad237, doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad237

  43. #NewPaper #Paleontology #MassExtinctions

    Thomas J Algeo, Jun Shen, Theory and classification of mass extinction causation, National Science Review, 2023;, nwad237, doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad237

  44. #NewPaper #Paleontology #MassExtinctions

    Thomas J Algeo, Jun Shen, Theory and classification of mass extinction causation, National Science Review, 2023;, nwad237, doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad237

  45. #NewPaper #Paleontology #MassExtinctions

    Thomas J Algeo, Jun Shen, Theory and classification of mass extinction causation, National Science Review, 2023;, nwad237, doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad237

  46. #NewPaper #Paleontology #MassExtinctions

    Thomas J Algeo, Jun Shen, Theory and classification of mass extinction causation, National Science Review, 2023;, nwad237, doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad237

  47. #NewPaper by Jonathan Lee:
    Lok, C., Lee, J. H. N., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. Responses to Cantonese A-not-A questions by Cantonese-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism. (Online first) doi.org/10.1177/13670069251405

  48. #NewPaper by Jonathan Lee:
    Lok, C., Lee, J. H. N., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. Responses to Cantonese A-not-A questions by Cantonese-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism. (Online first) doi.org/10.1177/13670069251405

  49. #NewPaper by Jonathan Lee:
    Lok, C., Lee, J. H. N., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. Responses to Cantonese A-not-A questions by Cantonese-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism. (Online first) doi.org/10.1177/13670069251405

  50. #NewPaper by Jonathan Lee:
    Lok, C., Lee, J. H. N., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. Responses to Cantonese A-not-A questions by Cantonese-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism. (Online first) doi.org/10.1177/13670069251405