#managment — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #managment, aggregated by home.social.
-
#canape #sofa
#fuck #capitalism #toxicmanagment #managmentNot allowed to rest in coffee corner sofa.
....lol. -
Когда «просто проведи кастдев» — худший совет
Нет клиентов, времени или денег — а стратегия нужна вчера? Бывают ситуации, когда полноценное дискавери просто невозможно. Кейс о том, как я из этого выбрался, и все промпты внутри.
-
Ты делегируешь не задачу, а надежду
Использую AI каждый день и устал от одной штуки — результат непредсказуемый. Час итераций, простыня на полстраницы с ролями, со «step by step», с «think carefully», и в итоге сидишь и переписываешь сам. Длина не лечит, магические слова не лечат. Промпт — не молитва. Проблема в том, что ты не подумал, что вообще хочешь получить. После часа итераций сидишь и думаешь: я что вообще делегировал — задачу или надежду на то, что само сложится?
https://habr.com/ru/articles/1029824/
#skill #ai #promt #claude #marketing #product #managment #it
-
Постбеки на языке бизнеса: чек-лист для переговоров с партнёром
Привет, Хабр! Я работаю аналитиком в телекоме и занимаюсь лидогенерацией. В последнее время всё чаще ловлю себя на одной и той же картине: заказчик хочет подключить постбеки, между нами стоят коллеги из бизнеса, и пока требования доходят от одной стороны до другой — успевают трижды исказиться. Классический сломанный телефон. Решил написать эту статью, чтобы один раз объяснить тему на языке бизнеса. Не для того, чтобы читатель сам пошёл настраивать интеграцию — а чтобы он мог внятно передать требования дальше, задать правильные вопросы подрядчику и понять, на что смотреть в отчётах. Если вы продакт, BA, маркетолог или руководитель направления, которому приходится иметь дело с CPA-партнёрами и трекерами — это для вас. В статье не будет протоколов, методов запросов и тонкостей авторизации. Зато будут схемы, картинки и аналогии с обычной жизнью — потому что объяснять постбеки без картинок — это как объяснять устройство автомобиля на пальцах. Можно, но зачем?
-
What the shit. #cariad insights
#softwaredevelopment #managment shitshow
-
What the shit. #cariad insights
#softwaredevelopment #managment shitshow
-
Почему я больше никогда не буду Team-Lead и тебе не советую
Я расскажу вам о своем опыте тимлида командой разработки в крупном банке, где старые управленческие привычки иногда брали верх над здравым смыслом. Это субъективная точка зрения на реальную ситуацию, где я — Д«Артаньян, а все остальные — редиски.
-
Ein bisschen mag ich ihn ja. Immer gerade raus, ein Typ mit Character. Sowas gibts heutzutage wenig.
In der Sache hat er natürlich recht. ;)
-
So, turns out Orwell predicted #generativeAI in #music production. What he didn't predict was that it would be produced by "free enterprise." It is the #musicindustry and the need for unmittigated #growth in #revenue and #profit . Easy and #costeffective #surveilance and #managment of the masses is merely a welcomed side-effect.
https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jul/6/nineteen-eighty-four/#atom-everything
-
So, turns out Orwell predicted #generativeAI in #music production. What he didn't predict was that it would be produced by "free enterprise." It is the #musicindustry and the need for unmittigated #growth in #revenue and #profit . Easy and #costeffective #surveilance and #managment of the masses is merely a welcomed side-effect.
https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jul/6/nineteen-eighty-four/#atom-everything
-
Today's #Blog post is a discussion on using #knowledge by #DoTadda This is a #portfolio #managment and #financial #analyst tool that helps you #research #earnings #calls Post: www.spsanderson.com/steveondata/... #GenAI #LLM #Finance #Research Reach out to @fatmnn.bsky.social for more.
-
Фасилитация: превращаем разговоры в решения
Или почему я считаю, что про фасилитацию нужно знать всем. Курс по фасилитации я прошла еще в далеком 2020 году благодаря тому, что мой менеджер убедила меня в том, что это точно пригодится. Валя, если ты это читаешь, спасибо тебе! Фасилитация — это процесс, в ходе которого нейтральный или не найтральный фасилитатор помогает группе работать эффективно, обсуждать идеи и принимать решения. Фасилитатор не участвует в обсуждениях и не высказывает своего мнения, но управляет процессом общения. Он помогает участникам сосредоточиться на цели встречи, направляет обсуждения, обеспечивает, чтобы каждый мог высказаться и предотвращает отклонение от темы. Роль фасилитатора — создать конструктивную атмосферу и помочь группе прийти к общему результату, будь то решение проблемы или принятие важного решения. В нашем неидеальном мире фасилитатор может участвовать во встречах, но это, конечно, не всегда просто. Я предлагаю взять полезные практики и сразу же начать использовать их в работе. Фасилитация значительно упростила мою работу сначала как QA, затем как QA Lead и Engineering Manager. Давайте сразу перейдем от теории к практике, где я использую фасилитацию.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/883744/
#managment #managment_it #meeting #facility_management #qa_lead #engineering_management #agile
-
Фасилитация: превращаем разговоры в решения
Или почему я считаю, что про фасилитацию нужно знать всем. Курс по фасилитации я прошла еще в далеком 2020 году благодаря тому, что мой менеджер убедила меня в том, что это точно пригодится. Валя, если ты это читаешь, спасибо тебе! Фасилитация — это процесс, в ходе которого нейтральный или не найтральный фасилитатор помогает группе работать эффективно, обсуждать идеи и принимать решения. Фасилитатор не участвует в обсуждениях и не высказывает своего мнения, но управляет процессом общения. Он помогает участникам сосредоточиться на цели встречи, направляет обсуждения, обеспечивает, чтобы каждый мог высказаться и предотвращает отклонение от темы. Роль фасилитатора — создать конструктивную атмосферу и помочь группе прийти к общему результату, будь то решение проблемы или принятие важного решения. В нашем неидеальном мире фасилитатор может участвовать во встречах, но это, конечно, не всегда просто. Я предлагаю взять полезные практики и сразу же начать использовать их в работе. Фасилитация значительно упростила мою работу сначала как QA, затем как QA Lead и Engineering Manager. Давайте сразу перейдем от теории к практике, где я использую фасилитацию.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/883742/
#managment #managment_it #meeting #facility_management #qa_lead #engineering_management #agile
-
Reading … A Field Guide to Team Dynamics and Conflict by Andy Cleff. Lot’s of good stuff and right ideas here. Lot’s of good tips and tricks. One to file away. #software #managment - https://www.andycleff.com/2024/12/a-field-guide-to-team-dynamics-and-conflict/
-
"Najlepsi specjaliści znacznie częściej informują przełożonych o swoich działaniach i postępach niż pozostali.
Nie dlatego, że muszą. Po prostu rozumieją coś, czego inni nie dostrzegają - jak ważny dla managerów jest obieg informacji. I jak dobrze wpływa to na ich wizerunek w zespole.
Najlepsi projektują ten proces z wyprzedzeniem, zamiast czekać na pytania szefa. Sami ustalają format i częstotliwość aktualizacji. Dostosowują je do charakteru projektu i stylu pracy przełożonego. "Tu wrzucę krótki update", "Po tym spotkaniu przekażę ustalenia", "W piątek zrobię mini-podsumowanie". Proste, ale przemyślane.To zmienia całą dynamikę. Przełożony przestaje dopytywać, bo ma już potrzebne informacje we właściwym momencie. A to buduje poczucie, że sprawy są pod kontrolą - doinformowany manager to zadowolony manager 🙂
Co ciekawe, gdy zapytasz takiego pracownika o czas poświęcony na komunikację w górę, odpowie że to kwestia minut. Powiedziałbym, że nawet bardziej wyrobienia odpowiedniego nawyku. "
Znalezione na profilu: https://www.facebook.com/arturjablonskicom
wrzucam to, bo mi sie to mega sprawdza... prawie ;) prawie, bo o ile mam spokoj od przelozonych / klientow to szlag mnie trafia, kiedy nie dostaje informacji od zespolu, nawet kiedy sam dopytuje... 😆
-
"Najlepsi specjaliści znacznie częściej informują przełożonych o swoich działaniach i postępach niż pozostali.
Nie dlatego, że muszą. Po prostu rozumieją coś, czego inni nie dostrzegają - jak ważny dla managerów jest obieg informacji. I jak dobrze wpływa to na ich wizerunek w zespole.
Najlepsi projektują ten proces z wyprzedzeniem, zamiast czekać na pytania szefa. Sami ustalają format i częstotliwość aktualizacji. Dostosowują je do charakteru projektu i stylu pracy przełożonego. "Tu wrzucę krótki update", "Po tym spotkaniu przekażę ustalenia", "W piątek zrobię mini-podsumowanie". Proste, ale przemyślane.To zmienia całą dynamikę. Przełożony przestaje dopytywać, bo ma już potrzebne informacje we właściwym momencie. A to buduje poczucie, że sprawy są pod kontrolą - doinformowany manager to zadowolony manager 🙂
Co ciekawe, gdy zapytasz takiego pracownika o czas poświęcony na komunikację w górę, odpowie że to kwestia minut. Powiedziałbym, że nawet bardziej wyrobienia odpowiedniego nawyku. "
Znalezione na profilu: https://www.facebook.com/arturjablonskicom
wrzucam to, bo mi sie to mega sprawdza... prawie ;) prawie, bo o ile mam spokoj od przelozonych / klientow to szlag mnie trafia, kiedy nie dostaje informacji od zespolu, nawet kiedy sam dopytuje... 😆
-
Curtis Gedak, the creator of GParted (GNOME Partition Editor), is a Canadian software engineer and open-source advocate. He is well-known in the Linux and open-source communities for his contributions to disk partitioning tools and his work on GParted, one of the most widely used open-source partition editors.
Read More: https://machaddr.substack.com/p/curtis-gedak-advocate-for-open-source
#Disk #Managment #OpenSource #Linux #UNIX #File #Systems #Computer #Science
-
Curtis Gedak, the creator of GParted (GNOME Partition Editor), is a Canadian software engineer and open-source advocate. He is well-known in the Linux and open-source communities for his contributions to disk partitioning tools and his work on GParted, one of the most widely used open-source partition editors.
Read More: https://machaddr.substack.com/p/curtis-gedak-advocate-for-open-source
#Disk #Managment #OpenSource #Linux #UNIX #File #Systems #Computer #Science
-
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X - @daveleebbg #Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-05/the-moral-case-for-no-longer-engaging-with-elon-musk-s-xA long opinion article on why not to engage any more on Twitter. But it all comes down to this conclusion:
⬇️ It starts and ends with the top.
-
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X - @daveleebbg #Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-05/the-moral-case-for-no-longer-engaging-with-elon-musk-s-xA long opinion article on why not to engage any more on Twitter. But it all comes down to this conclusion:
⬇️ It starts and ends with the top.
-
https://lateefjackson.com/posts/spectical-vs-impactful-ai/
#softwaredevelopment #ai #managment #softwareengineering #ml
I wrote some of the lessons learned developing software using AI / ML tools based on conversations and questions with other software engineers. Specific shout out to Ben Weintraub and Ryan Broughan for the discussion.
-
Question for
#managment
types... How much of your day is spent defending your actions? -
Espechally since I've yet to see #OpenBMC-powered #Servers or #Workstations [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBMC ] on the market since manfacturers are too busy pushing their own #BMC-based #managment solutions and sell #DLC's aka. #Licenses to nickel and dime customers for already implemented and installed features like a proper #iKVM [at least #Dell does so with their #iDRAC9] ....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Platform_Management_Interface#Baseboard_management_controller -
Loyal workers are selectively and ironically targeted for exploitation - because… of course they are. #Labor #Work #Managment #WorkerExploitation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103122001615
-
Loyal workers are selectively and ironically targeted for exploitation - because… of course they are. #Labor #Work #Managment #WorkerExploitation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103122001615
-
Representative Peltola advocates for changes to National Standards for NOAA fisheries management
[the_ad id="30587"]Gillnet with salmon. Image-NOAA Fisheries
Washington, D.C. – On September 12th, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) completed the public comment period for its notice of...
https://alaska-native-news.com/representative-peltola-advocates-for-changes-to-national-standards-for-noaa-fisheries-management/69918/
#comments #managment #noaa #peltola #rulemaking -
Gibt sicherlich genügend inkompetente Chefs (m/w/d). Aber eigentlich erwarte ich an der Entscheidungsspitze nicht einen Spezialisten, sondern einen Generalisten. Der/die also mehrere Ziele gleichermaßen im Blick behält und bei Entscheidungen gleichermaßen umsichtig und mutig ist. Wenn dann noch Empathie und Fairness dazu kommen, kann das einE richtig guteR ChefIn sein.
-
ICYMI:
I've been recently worrying about the state of the UK's #managment; in this recent article for @NWBylines I conclude:
'blaming workers for the stagnation in #productivity & thinking there will be a simple technical fix, is certainly not going to resolve the more insidious problem of bad management'!
The UK's accidental & bullying managers are a problem that is eating away at our prosperity & economic potential - don't blame the #workers they miss-manage!
https://northwestbylines.co.uk/business/whos-responsible-for-reduced-productivity/
-
ICYMI:
I've been recently worrying about the state of the UK's #managment; in this recent article for @NWBylines I conclude:
'blaming workers for the stagnation in #productivity & thinking there will be a simple technical fix, is certainly not going to resolve the more insidious problem of bad management'!
The UK's accidental & bullying managers are a problem that is eating away at our prosperity & economic potential - don't blame the #workers they miss-manage!
https://northwestbylines.co.uk/business/whos-responsible-for-reduced-productivity/
-
Kannst du gut Entscheidungen treffen?
Manchmal fällt es einem schwer, wichtige Entscheidungen zu treffen – in den eigenen Lebensbereichen, aber auch im beruflichen Kontext.
Im Interview sprechen wir mit dem Managementforscher Philip Meissner über gute und schlechte Entscheidungen – wie wichtig dabei Kritiker:innen sind, erfährst du hier: 👉 https://t3n.de/news/management-entscheidungen-talent-interview-philip-meissner-1150666/
#managment #entscheidung #ratgeber #interview #karriere #beruf
-
Kannst du gut Entscheidungen treffen?
Manchmal fällt es einem schwer, wichtige Entscheidungen zu treffen – in den eigenen Lebensbereichen, aber auch im beruflichen Kontext.
Im Interview sprechen wir mit dem Managementforscher Philip Meissner über gute und schlechte Entscheidungen – wie wichtig dabei Kritiker:innen sind, erfährst du hier: 👉 https://t3n.de/news/management-entscheidungen-talent-interview-philip-meissner-1150666/
#managment #entscheidung #ratgeber #interview #karriere #beruf
-
Getting started as a technology or team lead is challenging. This post lists a few books and resources that helped (and still help) me: https://www.alexanderjunge.net/blog/lead-books/
As a bonus, I list two books for people interested in the staff engineer career path.
#managment #engineering #tech -
Management is the most in-demand skill. ChatGPT can't do it
https://www.fastcompany.com/90851293/most-in-demand-skills-2023-linkedin-management-chatgpt-cant-do #chatgpt Computers and #AI can’t be human and that’s what we still need. #managment #skills @edtech @edchat @edutooters @edutooter We might need to teach students how to be managers. #linkedin #chatgpt #machinelearning
-
@kwf the problem is that #TechIlliterates and #ignorant morons in #managment make decisions, not the people who actually know shit and have to keep stuff maintained and online.
And even if they want dedicaded layered security: Get them some #pfSense/#OPNsense in front of it or DIY some #iptables if you feel frisky...
-
Book Review: Turn the Ship Around - L. David Marquet
https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2019/10/book-review-turn-the-ship-around-l-david-marquet/
-
7 Management Myths That Need To Be Busted
https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/09/6-management-myths-that-need-to-be-busted/
There are many aspects of modern business management which bother me. More than anything though, is the relentless invasion of idiotic myths which seems to pass for "inspirational leadership".
I've sat in many classrooms - with many different employers - and I keep seeing the same lies being told to students. HR and training teams seem to incessantly buy into the slick and convincing pre-packaged nonsense of "gurus".
I want to make this abundantly clear - there is a difference between facts and opinions. There is a difference between science and superstition. There is a difference between truth and lies.
There are things we can prove, things we can disprove, things which sound convincing, and things which we just feel must be right.
It's important that leaders are convincing speakers, have well thought through plans, and know what they are talking about. Yet too much of modern leadership science seems to be taken up with myths rather than facts. No one can be expected to lead if the foundation of their knowledge is built on a bed of naked falsehoods.
I'd like to tackle some of the more common tropes which find their way into business leadership lessons around the globe. These are easily debunked factoids which sneak their way into classrooms under the pretence of being good science. As I hope to demonstrate, there are merely a series of poorly understood pieces of trivia which have no place in a modern organisation.
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
I'm sure you've been in a meeting where someone in a very expensive suit has thrown up this image:Occasionally, they'll alter it to put their product in there - what laughs!
Maslow's Hierachy of Needs (MHN) looks, superficially, to be good science. It was created by a respected scientist who properly understood the limitations of the scope of his work, and has been used for over 80 years. Sadly, it has severe deficiencies - which leads to it frequently being misapplied.
- Culture Specific. Maslow was looking at "Western" people. Does every culture place such a high value on individualism? No.
- Age specific. How important is sex to you when you're a teenager? How about when you're in old age? How does the need for security change throughout your lifetime?
- Where is spiritual satisfaction on the list?
- Can you not be a poor, hungry person who is happily solving problems?
- What happens in hostile environments, like war? Do your needs change?
- Several studies have shown that Maslow's ordering is simply incorrect for a large number of people.
In short, it's poor form to overstate the importance in a management context.
So, why is this still being taught in businesses around the world as a suitable tool for managing people?
55% of Communication is through Body Language!
Oh dear! How many times has some "motivational speaker" told you to get up off your arse and jump around like a lunatic because "the majority of communication is non-verbal"?
I'll admit it - I'm one of those people. I get people moving around to help warm them up, to motivate them, to get their heart pumping. But that's because I think it makes people more confident - not because their body language has a such a large impact on their presentation.
Before we get in to the origin of this zombie statistic, let's ask a simple question: How do you quantify such an exact percentage which is true for all forms of communication?
Anyway, the 55% rule comes from Albert Mehrabian - a professor at UCLA. His actual findings look at people* discussing feelings and emotions. He discovered that in ambiguous situations, meaning was derived in the following ratios.7% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is in the words that are spoken.38% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is paralinguistic (the way that the words are said).55% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is in facial expression.
He specifically says
"Please note that this and other equations regarding relative importance of verbal and nonverbal messages were derived from experiments dealing with communications of feelings and attitudes (i.e., like-dislike). Unless a communicator is talking about their feelings or attitudes, these equations are not applicable."
This isn't to say that facial expressions aren't important - they are - but businesses should not be fooled into thinking that simply improving the body language of their staff will result in better communication.
*The final kicker is that this ratio doesn't apply to all people - just women. Yes, that's right, Mehrabian's experiment was only conducted on women! The women listened to single words recorded on to tape. No men were involved, and no face-to-face communication took place.
Is this really the foundation upon which businesses are basing their beliefs?
We Only Use 10% of Our Brains
I've sat in seminars where some motivational speaker has tried to enthuse the crowd by telling us about our limitless potential. "Did you know," they squeal with glee, "that you only use 10 percent of your brain? You have vast, untapped depth which will allow you to conquer any situation."
The polite response in such situations is to ask the presenter which bits of their brain they would like scooped out.
This 10% "fact" is a complete myth. It's so barely plausible that it's easy enough to demonstrate to small children that it's wrong.
There's no doubt the human brain is a remarkable organ. It contains many facets which we still don't completely understand. With hard work, it's possible to expand our knowledge, and alter our neuroplasticity.
Our brain is always in use - all of it. Not everyone uses it to their full potential, not everyone works as hard as they can, and - if people engaged their brain a little more - this pernicious 10% myth would finally die off.
NLP™
Neuro-Linguistic Programming™. All three of those words sound very scientific. I mean wow!
The first thing to say about NLP™, is that it is a product to be packaged and sold. Hence the ™. It is not scientific term - it is a marketing term.
The second thing to say about NLP™, is that it doesn't work. I don't mean that some people find it unhelpful, I mean that every piece of scientific research into it has conclusively shown that it doesn't work.
So why, in the 21st century are HR departments still wasting vast sums of money on this?
Myers Briggs
I've already blogged about how Myers Briggs is little better than astrology.In short, MBTI was specifically designed to get British women from the 1940s into jobs which are suitable to their temperament. Neither Myers nor Briggs had any psychological or statistical training.
Despite repeated testing, there has never been any evidence that MBTI is accurate or useful.
The fact that this nonsense has stayed around so long is a dark stain on modern business.
...And Yet...
Perhaps you have violently disagreed with my categorisation of your favourite management fad. What I'd like you to understand is that what seems sensible to you seems downright bizarre to other people.
Have a read of these next two examples and tell me if you think that they are sensible ways to manage people.
Blood Type
Should you manage people differently depending on their temperament? Probably; different people have different needs.
Should you attempt to determine your employee's attitude via their blood type?Wait? What?
It sounds weird - yet it's fairly common practice in Japan.
Take a look at the chart. Doesn't it seem familiar? Much the same traits which are "measured" by MBTI and other associated quackery. There's no science in it, of course, yet individuals are encouraged to marry "compatible" blood types and bosses are actively recruiting people based on their blood type.
Essentially, it's a horoscope with scientific pretensions.
It has all the appearance of a real science - yet there is no genuine research to back it up. Take a look at MBTI, NLP, or any other management technique which sounds like it has a scientific basis. How is it any different from the superstition of blood types?
Handwriting Analysis
I'm sure you remember having to submit a handwritten application for a job. It was probably many years ago - before computers were widespread. Unless, of course, you live in France! In some parts of France, Graphology - the "science" of interpreting handwriting - is alive and well.
I'm not sure what an analysis of my handwriting would show, other than I never hand write anything longer than my signature on official forms...
Curiously, some 50% of French companies use handwriting analysis. What would your reaction be if your HR team insisted that every employee had to submit themselves to such nonsense? That team assignments and pay rises would be based on some witch-doctor's reading of your penmanship
Unthinkable - surely?
Well, it works for me!
"Ah, but it works for me..." is usually the response I get when I bring this up.
Personally, that sounds a lot like an elephant stone to me. You see, I have this stone that I keep in my pocket to keep the elephants away. It's working splendidly - I haven't been attacked by an elephant ever since I started carrying it around.
Aspirin is a great example of this. If you take 100 people with headaches and give them aspirin, 60% of them will report a reduction in pain. After 2 hours, 30% of them will be pain free.
If you perform the same experiment with a placebo - that is a pill with no medicinal properties - after 2 hours 6% of people will report being pain free.
So, 6% of people will swear that a tic-tac cured their headache. Is that a sound basis on which to refuse aspirin next time your head hurts?
There is an excellent and easily readable paper from The Journal of Headache and Pain which explains the placebo effect on headaches.
What Next?
It's easy to point out on a blog that someone is talking rubbish. It's a lot harder to do so in real life. The next time someone tries to impress you with one of these grand sounding systems, you should have the courage to stick your hand up and ask for proof.
Speaking truth to power is rarely popular. But I think it's important that the people who lead us understand that they cannot build on a foundation of lies.
Because, at their heart, that's what these systems are - lies. Clever lies we tell people in order to manipulate them. And that's no way to build trust between management and employees.