home.social

#fourthamendment — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #fourthamendment, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Reuters: The Epstein Files and the risks of forensic image retention. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to experience blowback from how it handled the release of voluminous files from the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein. Overlooked in this debate is the Fourth Amendment question raised by the disclosures themselves: what the Constitution requires when the government makes […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/17/reuters-the-epstein-files-and-the-risks-of-forensic-image-retention/
  2. Reuters: The Epstein Files and the risks of forensic image retention. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to experience blowback from how it handled the release of voluminous files from the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein. Overlooked in this debate is the Fourth Amendment question raised by the disclosures themselves: what the Constitution requires when the government makes […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/17/reuters-the-epstein-files-and-the-risks-of-forensic-image-retention/
  3. Reuters: The Epstein Files and the risks of forensic image retention. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to experience blowback from how it handled the release of voluminous files from the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein. Overlooked in this debate is the Fourth Amendment question raised by the disclosures themselves: what the Constitution requires when the government makes […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/17/reuters-the-epstein-files-and-the-risks-of-forensic-image-retention/
  4. Reuters: The Epstein Files and the risks of forensic image retention. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to experience blowback from how it handled the release of voluminous files from the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein. Overlooked in this debate is the Fourth Amendment question raised by the disclosures themselves: what the Constitution requires when the government makes […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/17/reuters-the-epstein-files-and-the-risks-of-forensic-image-retention/
  5. Reuters: The Epstein Files and the risks of forensic image retention. “The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to experience blowback from how it handled the release of voluminous files from the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein. Overlooked in this debate is the Fourth Amendment question raised by the disclosures themselves: what the Constitution requires when the government makes […]

    https://rbfirehose.com/2026/05/17/reuters-the-epstein-files-and-the-risks-of-forensic-image-retention/
  6. English – The Conversation | Supreme Court geofencing case weighs constitutionality of digital dragnets – and how far your rights go in the data Big Tech collects on you by Anne Toomey McKenna, Affiliated Faculty Member, Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, Penn State

    AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.

    The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide whether law‑enforcement can use “geofence” warrants—orders that force tech companies such as Google to turn over the location data of every cellphone within a defined area and time frame—to investigate crimes, a practice at the heart of the case Chatrie v. United States. The dispute arose from a 2019 armed bank robbery in Midlothian, Virginia, where detectives obtained a warrant that compelled Google to identify all devices in a 17½‑acre zone for two hours, ultimately leading them to suspect Okello Chatrie. While the trial court and the Fourth Circuit upheld the warrant as lawful, the Fifth Circuit recently declared similar geofence warrants unconstitutional “general warrants” under the Fourth Amendment, creating a split that the Supreme Court must resolve. Critics argue that these warrants bypass the constitutional requirement of particularity, sweep up innocent users who never consented to be included, and lack adequate judicial oversight, whereas the government maintains that users voluntarily share location data and therefore have no reasonable expectation of privacy. The Court’s ruling will shape the future of digital surveillance, defining whether broad, reverse‑search warrants can be used to capture the digital trails that modern smartphones continuously generate.

    Read more: theconversation.com/supreme-co

    #SupremeCourt #Google #FourthAmendment #bigtech #OkelloChatrie

  7. Salon.com | US government ramps up mass surveillance with help of AI tech, your apps by Anne Toomey McKenna

    AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.

    The article explains that the U.S. government is dramatically expanding mass surveillance by buying enormous quantities of personal data from commercial brokers and by forging partnerships with private tech firms to collect information directly, then using artificial‑intelligence tools to analyze it at scale. Everyday devices—smartphones, car sensors, home‑door cameras, wearables, and payment apps—gather detailed biometric, location, health, and behavioral data that is sold on the data‑broker market, and recent federal funding (e.g., $165 billion to the Department of Homeland Security and $86 billion to Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is being funneled into AI‑driven systems for predictive policing, sentiment analysis, and geospatial heat‑mapping. This rapid expansion blurs the line between legitimate national‑security work and unlawful domestic spying, sidestepping Fourth‑Amendment safeguards and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, while oversight remains weak. The author, a privacy and tech‑law attorney, argues that restoring the original intent of the Wiretap Act, passing comprehensive data‑privacy legislation, and tightening regulation of AI‑enabled surveillance are essential to protect Americans’ privacy.

    Read more: salon.com/2026/04/23/us-govern

    #U.S.government #HomelandSecurity #FourthAmendment #ArtificialIntelligence #surveillance

    AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.

  8. State Level VPN Restriction Attempts Trigger Dangerous Constitutional Pressure

    State Level VPN Restrictions raise major First and Fourth Amendment risks while exposing how weak state internet enforcement can become.

    thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-

  9. New legislation aims to roll back the expanded definition of Electronic Communications Service Providers and tighten FBI wiretap rules. It would restore stricter warrant requirements under the Fourth Amendment and curb data‑broker access to Section 702 data. Could this shift protect privacy or hinder investigations? Read more to find out. #ECSProvider #Section702 #FBIwiretap #FourthAmendment

    🔗 aidailypost.com/news/bill-repe

  10. EFF to #SupremeCourt : Shut Down #Unconstitutional #Geofence Searches

    Digital #Dragnets Violate #FourthAmendment , Brief Argues

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union ( #ACLU ), the ACLU of #Virginia, and the Center on #Privacy & Technology at #GeorgetownLaw filed a brief Monday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that invasive geofence #warrants are unconstitutional.
    #scotus #privacy

    eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

  11. EFF to #SupremeCourt : Shut Down #Unconstitutional #Geofence Searches

    Digital #Dragnets Violate #FourthAmendment , Brief Argues

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union ( #ACLU ), the ACLU of #Virginia, and the Center on #Privacy & Technology at #GeorgetownLaw filed a brief Monday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that invasive geofence #warrants are unconstitutional.
    #scotus #privacy

    eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

  12. EFF to #SupremeCourt : Shut Down #Unconstitutional #Geofence Searches

    Digital #Dragnets Violate #FourthAmendment , Brief Argues

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union ( #ACLU ), the ACLU of #Virginia, and the Center on #Privacy & Technology at #GeorgetownLaw filed a brief Monday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that invasive geofence #warrants are unconstitutional.
    #scotus #privacy

    eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

  13. EFF to : Shut Down Searches

    Digital Violate , Brief Argues

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union ( ), the ACLU of , and the Center on & Technology at filed a brief Monday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that invasive geofence are unconstitutional.

    eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

  14. EFF to #SupremeCourt : Shut Down #Unconstitutional #Geofence Searches

    Digital #Dragnets Violate #FourthAmendment , Brief Argues

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union ( #ACLU ), the ACLU of #Virginia, and the Center on #Privacy & Technology at #GeorgetownLaw filed a brief Monday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that invasive geofence #warrants are unconstitutional.
    #scotus #privacy

    eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

  15. #SamAltman says #OpenAI will tweak its #Pentagon deal after #surveillance backlash
    "Consistent with applicable laws, including the #FourthAmendment to the #UnitedStates Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of #US persons and nationals," Altman wrote on X.
    businessinsider.com/openai-ame
    archive.ph/CLRm9

    Is this a real change or placating the masses after backlash over AI use and surveillance fears?

  16. 🎉BREAKING: Apparently, the Tenth Circuit just discovered the Fourth Amendment 📜 exists! Who knew? Meanwhile, protesters everywhere breathe a sigh of relief 😅 as they can finally stop worrying about their devices being treated like piñatas at a surveillance birthday party. 🎈🔍
    eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02/vict #FourthAmendment #TenthCircuit #PrivacyRights #SurveillanceProtests #DigitalFreedom #HackerNews #ngated

  17. Victory! #TenthCircuit Finds #FourthAmendment Doesn’t Support Broad #Search of Protesters’ Devices and Digital Data

    In a big win for protesters’ #rights , the U.S. #CourtofAppeals for the Tenth Circuit overturned a lower court’s dismissal of a challenge to sweeping #warrants to search a protester’s devices and digital data and a nonprofit’s social media data.
    #protester #privacy

    eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02/vict