home.social

#geofence — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #geofence, aggregated by home.social.

  1. ‘Tower dump’ warrants ruled #unconstitutional
    A "tower dump" involves #cellphone companies providing #lawenforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to a cell tower
    "That is an unreasonable search under the #FourthAmendment," judge concluded
    The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that #geofence #warrants require constitutional #privacy protections
    thehill.com/regulation/court-b

  2. ‘Tower dump’ warrants ruled #unconstitutional
    A "tower dump" involves #cellphone companies providing #lawenforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to a cell tower
    "That is an unreasonable search under the #FourthAmendment," judge concluded
    The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that #geofence #warrants require constitutional #privacy protections
    thehill.com/regulation/court-b

  3. ‘Tower dump’ warrants ruled
    A "tower dump" involves companies providing with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to a cell tower
    "That is an unreasonable search under the ," judge concluded
    The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that require constitutional protections
    thehill.com/regulation/court-b

  4. ‘Tower dump’ warrants ruled #unconstitutional
    A "tower dump" involves #cellphone companies providing #lawenforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to a cell tower
    "That is an unreasonable search under the #FourthAmendment," judge concluded
    The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that #geofence #warrants require constitutional #privacy protections
    thehill.com/regulation/court-b

  5. In major #privacy win, #SupremeCourt rules #geofence #warrants are protected by privacy rights
    In the 6-3 ruling, #SCOTUS said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone #location information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. #4thAmendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
    techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-m

  6. In major #privacy win, #SupremeCourt rules #geofence #warrants are protected by privacy rights
    In the 6-3 ruling, #SCOTUS said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone #location information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. #4thAmendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
    techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-m

  7. In major win, rules are protected by privacy rights
    In the 6-3 ruling, said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
    techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-m

  8. In major #privacy win, #SupremeCourt rules #geofence #warrants are protected by privacy rights
    In the 6-3 ruling, #SCOTUS said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone #location information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. #4thAmendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
    techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-m

  9. #SupremeCourt ruling guts government’s use of #geofence #warrants

    The #FourthAmendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

    The same logic already applied to a cellphone’s #tracking , and the high court found “no good reason exists to reach a different result for Location History” collected by third parties like #Google.

    Split 6-3, the majority agreed that the government needs a #warrant and must show reasonable cause to turn a phone's location-tracking services into a government #surveillance tool.
    #privacy

    arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

  10. #SupremeCourt ruling guts government’s use of #geofence #warrants

    The #FourthAmendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

    The same logic already applied to a cellphone’s #tracking , and the high court found “no good reason exists to reach a different result for Location History” collected by third parties like #Google.

    Split 6-3, the majority agreed that the government needs a #warrant and must show reasonable cause to turn a phone's location-tracking services into a government #surveillance tool.
    #privacy

    arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

  11. #SupremeCourt ruling guts government’s use of #geofence #warrants

    The #FourthAmendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

    The same logic already applied to a cellphone’s #tracking , and the high court found “no good reason exists to reach a different result for Location History” collected by third parties like #Google.

    Split 6-3, the majority agreed that the government needs a #warrant and must show reasonable cause to turn a phone's location-tracking services into a government #surveillance tool.
    #privacy

    arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

  12. #SupremeCourt ruling guts government’s use of #geofence #warrants

    The #FourthAmendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

    The same logic already applied to a cellphone’s #tracking , and the high court found “no good reason exists to reach a different result for Location History” collected by third parties like #Google.

    Split 6-3, the majority agreed that the government needs a #warrant and must show reasonable cause to turn a phone's location-tracking services into a government #surveillance tool.
    #privacy

    arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20