home.social

#warrants — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #warrants, aggregated by home.social.

  1. europesays.com/ch-fr/303056/ Les rendements obligataires avoisinent leurs plus hauts niveaux depuis plusieurs années, Wall Street s’envole alors que l’inflation s’accélère aux États-Unis – 11/09/2026 à 16:22 #ActionCAC40 #BourseDeParis #Boursorama #Business #cotations #Économie #Economy #IndicesDevises #investir #investissement #MarchéBoursier #Sicav #Suisse #trackers #warrants

  2. europesays.com/ch-fr/301755/ Golf – LIV Golf obtient l’autorisation provisoire du tribunal pour accéder à un financement de 14 millions de dollars dans le cadre de la procédure de faillite – 11/09/2026 à 02:45 #ActionCAC40 #BourseDeParis #Boursorama #cotations #IndicesDevises #investir #investissement #MarchéBoursier #Sicav #Sports #Suisse #trackers #warrants

  3. 'Tower Dump' #Warrants Ruled #Unconstitutional

    The Hill: A federal judge in #Mississippi ruled Wednesday that "tower dump" warrants are unconstitutional, declining to reverse a lower court decision refusing the government's request to obtain the search warrants in a series of violent crime investigations. A "tower dump" involves #cellphone companies providing law enforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to specific cell towers during a designated time window.
    #towerdump #privacy #4thamendment

    yro.slashdot.org/story/26/08/0

  4. ‘Tower dump’ warrants ruled #unconstitutional
    A "tower dump" involves #cellphone companies providing #lawenforcement with access to the time and location data of all mobile devices connected to a cell tower
    "That is an unreasonable search under the #FourthAmendment," judge concluded
    The order repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision in Chatrie v United States, in which the majority held that #geofence #warrants require constitutional #privacy protections
    thehill.com/regulation/court-b

  5. #US #SupremeCourt appears split over controversial use of '#geofence' search #warrants
    The case, Chatrie v. United States, centers on the government’s controversial use of so-called “geofence” #searchwarrants. #Lawenforcement and federal agents use these warrants to compel tech companies, like Google, to turn over information about which of its billions of users were in a certain place and time based on their #phone’s location.
    techcrunch.com/2026/04/28/scot #privacy #surveillance

  6. 2nd, & much more dramatically, the #FifthCircuit rules that bc the database of #geofence records is so large, & bc the whole database must be scanned through to find matches, the #FourthAmendment does not allow courts to issue #warrants to collect those records. In #legal terms, it is impossible to have a warrant particular enough to authorize the #surveillance. IOW, the govt can't gather these kinds of online records at all, even w/a #warrant based on #ProbableCause.

    #law #InfoSec #privacy

  7. Once in a while there is a court ruling on the #FourthAmendment that just makes my jaw drop. [The #ExtremistCourt] The #FifthCircuit had such a ruling last Friday, United States v. Jamarr Smith.…

    The new case is about the Fourth Amendment limits of #geofence #warrants, which are warrants to access #location #information for users who have opted into having Internet providers retain location history. 

    - Orin Kerr
    @lawfare
    #law #InfoSec #privacy
    mastodon.social/@lawfare/11296

  8. In a major decision federal #FifthCircuit #CourtofAppeals held that #geofence #warrants are “categorically prohibited by the #FourthAmendment.”
    Court determined under Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Carpenter v. United States, individuals have reasonable expectation of #privacy in #location data implicated by #geofencewarrants.
    Second, court found that even though investigators seek warrants for geofence location data, these searches are inherently #unconstitutional.
    eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/fede